Renal transplantation in adults with autosomal recessive inheritance of hemolytic uremic syndrome

A newly identified mutation in the complement factor I gene not associated with early post-transplant recurrence of atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a case report

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), which can recur after renal transplantation, is associated with poor graft outcomes. The underlying genetic defect, namely, mutations in genes coding for the complement factor H, I (CFI), or membrane cofactor protein, greatly impacts the risk of aHUS recurrence. We report here the case of a patient with chronic renal failure due to aHUS in which screening for complement mutations, performed before wait-listing for kidney transplantation, showed a never described previously heterozygous mutation in the exon II of the CFI gene. Specifically, this mutation leads to a substitution of cytosine for guanosine at nucleotide 148, resulting in the change at amino acid 50 from arginine to proline. Subsequently, he received a renal allograft from deceased donor. Good graft function was established immediately, without clinical features of aHUS. Due to a lack of data on this mutation, we avoided prophylactic treatment for aHUS but closely monitored biochemical markers of aHUS to treat a possible recurrence. Immunosuppressive treatment was based on basiliximab, tacrolimus, steroids, and mycophenolic acid. At the time of discharge the serum creatinine was 1.4 mg/dL. Ten months after transplantation the patient is doing well without evidence of aHUS. Our case suggested that a heterozygous mutation in exon II of the CFI gene was not associated with a risk of early post-transplant aHUs recurrence adding new knowledge on complement mutations implicated in aHUS post-transplant recurrences.

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal failure. The atypical form of HUS is a disease characterized by complement overactivation. Inherited defects in complement genes and acquired autoantibodies against complement regulatory proteins have been described. Incomplete penetrance of mutations in all predisposing genes is reported, suggesting that a precipitating event or trigger is required to unmask the complement regulatory deficiency. The underlying genetic defect predicts the prognosis both in native kidneys and after renal transplantation. The successful trials of the complement inhibitor eculizumab in the treatment of atypical HUS will revolutionize disease management.

Variant-specific quantification of factor H in plasma identifies null alleles associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is associated with complement alternative pathway defects in over half the cases. Point mutations that affect complement surface regulation are common in factor H (CFH); however, sometimes individuals have null mutations in heterozygosis. The latter are difficult to identify, although a consistently low plasma factor H (fH) concentration is suggestive; definitive proof requires demonstration that the mutant sequence is not expressed in vitro. Here, novel reagents and assays that distinguish and individually quantify the common factor H-Y402H polymorphic variants were used to identify alleles of the CFH gene, resulting in low or null expression of full-length fH and also normal or increased expression of the alternative splice product factor H-like-1 (FHL-1). Our assay identified three Y402H heterozygotes with low or absent fH-H402 but normal or increased FHL-1-H402 levels in a cohort of affected patients. Novel mutations explained the null phenotype in two cases, which was confirmed by family studies in one. In the third case, family studies showed that a known mutation was present on the Y allele. The cause of reduced expression of the H allele was not found, although the data suggested altered splicing. In each family, inheritance of low expression or null alleles for fH strongly associated with aHUS. Thus, our assays provide a rapid means to identify fH expression defects without resorting to gene sequencing or expression analysis.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome recurrence after renal transplantation

About 60% of non-Stx-associated aHUS are due to the defect of protection of endothelial cells from complement activation, secondary to mutations in the genes of CFH, MCP, IF, BF, or C3. In addition, 10% of patients have anti-CFH antibodies. While the risk of post-transplant recurrence is less than 1% in Stx-HUS patients, it is approximately 80% in CFH or IF-mutated patients, 20% in MCP-mutated patients, and 30% in patients with no mutation. Patients with anti-CFH antibodies probably also are at risk of recurrence. While MCP-mutated patients can reasonably go to transplantation, recent reports suggest that plasmatherapy started before surgery and maintained life-long may prevent recurrence in CFH-mutated patients. Four successful liver-kidney transplantation utilizing plasmatherapy in CFH-mutated children have been reported recently. In summary, the risk of post-transplant recurrence can now be approached according to genotype. Therefore, aHUS patients should undergo complement determination, screening for anti-CFH antibodies, and genotyping before transplantation. Kidney or kidney + liver transplantation with concomitant plasmatherapy need to be evaluated by prospective trials in patients with hereditary complement abnormalities.

Plasma therapy in atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome: lessons from a family with a factor H mutation

Whilst randomised control trials are undoubtedly the best way to demonstrate whether plasma exchange or infusion alone is the best first-line treatment for patients with atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), individual case reports can provide valuable information. To that effect, we have had the unique opportunity to follow over a 10-year period three sisters with aHUS associated with a factor H mutation (CFH). Two of the sisters are monozygotic twins. A similar natural evolution and response to treatment would be expected for the three patients, as they all presented with the same at-risk polymorphisms for CFH and CD46 and no identifiable mutation in either CD46 or CFI. Our report of different modalities of treatment of the initial episode and of three transplantations and relapses in the transplant in two of them, strongly suggest that intensive plasma exchange, both acutely and prophylactically, can maintain the long-term function of both native kidneys and allografts. In our experience, the success of plasma therapy is dependent on the use of plasma exchange as opposed to plasma infusion alone, the prolongation of daily plasma exchange after normalisation of haematological parameters followed by prophylactic plasma exchange, the use of prophylactic plasma exchange prior to transplantation and the use of prophylactic plasma exchange at least once a week posttransplant with immediate intensification of treatment if there are any signs of recurrence.

Implications of the initial mutations in membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) leading to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

The hemolytic uremic syndrome is characterized by the triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure. There are two general types. One occurs in epidemic form and is diarrheal associated (D+HUS). It has a good prognosis. The second is a rare form known as atypical (aHUS), which may be familial or sporadic, and has a poor prognosis. aHUS is increasingly recognized to be a disease of defective complement regulation, particularly cofactor activity. Mutations in membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) that predispose to the development of aHUS were first identified in 2003. MCP is a membrane-bound complement regulator that acts as a cofactor for the factor I-mediated cleavage of C3b and C4b deposited on host cells. More than 20 different mutations in MCP have now been identified in patients with aHUS. Many of these mutants have been functionally characterized and have helped to define the pathogenic mechanisms leading to aHUS development. Over 75% of the reported mutations cause a reduction in MCP expression, due to homozygous, compound heterozygous or heterozygous mutations. This deficiency of MCP leads to inadequate control of complement activation on endothelial cells after an initiating injury. The remaining MCP mutants are expressed, but demonstrate reduced ligand (C3b/C4b) binding capacity and cofactor activity of MCP. MCP mutations in aHUS demonstrate incomplete penetrance, indicating that additional genetic and environmental factors are required to manifest disease. MCP mutants as a cause of aHUS have a favorable clinical outcome in comparison to patients with factor H (CFH) or factor I (IF) mutations. In 90% of the renal transplants performed in patients with MCP-HUS, there has been no recurrence of the primary disease, whilst >50% of factor I or factor H deficient patients have had a prompt recurrence. This highlights the importance of defining and characterizing the underlying genetic defects in patients with aHUS.

Outcome of renal transplantation in patients with non-Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: prognostic significance of genetic background

More than 50% of patients with non-Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (non-Stx-HUS) progress to ESRD. Kidney transplant failure for disease recurrence is common; hence, whether renal transplantation is appropriate in this clinical setting remains a debated issue. The aim of this study was to identify possible prognostic factors for renal transplant outcome by focusing on specific genetic abnormalities associated with the disease. All articles in literature that describe renal transplant outcome in patients with ESRD secondary to non-Stx-HUS, genotyped for CFH, MCP, and IF mutations, were reviewed, and data of patients who were referred to the International Registry of Recurrent and Familial HUS/TTP and data from the Newcastle cohort were examined. This study confirmed that the overall outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with non-Stx-HUS is poor, with disease recurring in 60% of patients, 91.6% of whom developed graft failure. No clinical prognostic factor that could identify patients who were at high risk for graft failure was found. The presence of a factor H (CFH) mutation was associated with a high incidence of graft failure (77.8 versus 54.9% in patients without CFH mutation). Similar results were seen in patients with a factor I (IF) mutation. In contrast, graft outcome was favorable in all patients who carried a membrane co-factor protein (MCP) mutation. Patients with non-Stx-HUS should undergo genotyping before renal transplantation to help predict the risk for graft failure. It is debatable whether a kidney transplant should be recommended for patients with CFH or IF mutation. Reasonably, patients with an MCP mutation can undergo a kidney transplant without risk for recurrence.

Posttransplantation cytomegalovirus-induced recurrence of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome associated with a factor H mutation: successful treatment with intensive plasma exchanges and ganciclovir

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) can recur after renal transplantation and often leads to graft loss. In some series of familial HUS, the risk of early graft loss due to recurrence of HUS approaches 100% despite any therapy. This led some authors to claim that kidney transplantation is contraindicated in those patients. The authors describe an 8-year-old girl with end-stage renal failure owing to familial atypical HUS with a factor H mutation who underwent successful transplantation using continuous prophylactic plasma exchange (PE). Twenty-four months after transplantation, plasma creatinine level is 1.2 mg/dL (106 micromol/L) despite 2 recurrences of HUS contemporaneous to 2 cytomegalovirus infections, which resolved with PE intensification and ganciclovir. This strongly suggests that cytomegalovirus infection may trigger posttransplant recurrent HUS. The feasibility of kidney transplantation in case of atypical HUS related to factor H mutation using continuous prophylactic PE intensified during relapses should be confirmed in prospective studies.

The risk of recurrence of hemolytic uremic syndrome after renal transplantation in children

We reviewed the literature to analyze the risk of recurrence of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) after renal transplantation in children. Among 118 children transplanted after post-diarrheal (D+) HUS, 1 (0.8%) had recurrence with graft loss. Among 63 children transplanted after HUS not associated with a prodrome of diarrhea (D-) of unknown mechanism, 13 (21%) had recurrence with graft loss. Of 11 patients with HUS associated with factor H deficiency who were transplanted, 5 lost the graft because of recurrence. Of 7 patients with HUS associated with normal factor H concentration but mutations in factor H gene who were transplanted, probably 2 had recurrence. Three patients with HUS associated with low serum C3, but no factor H deficiency or mutation lost their graft because of recurrence. The risk of recurrence in the autosomal recessive forms of HUS of unknown mechanism is not documented in children, but is around 60% in adults. A similar risk has been reported in the autosomal dominant forms. The only transplant patient with a constitutional deficiency of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease had recurrence. Further efforts to document the post-transplant course of patients with D- HUS and progress in the understanding of the mechanisms and genetics of the disease are needed to allow more accurate prediction of the recurrence risk and to define therapeutic approaches.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome and mutations of the factor H gene: a registry-based study of German speaking countries

BACKGROUND

The aetiology of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is, in contrast to classical, Shiga-like toxin induced HUS in children, largely unknown. Deficiency of human complement factor H and familial occurrence led to identification of the factor H gene (FH1) as the susceptibility gene, but the frequency and relevance of FH1 mutations are unknown.

METHODS

We established a German registry for aHUS and analysed in all patients and 100 controls the complete FH1 gene by single strand confirmational polymorphism and DNA sequencing. In addition, complement C3 and factor H serum levels were assayed. Demographic data at onset of aHUS and follow up were compared for the mutation positive and negative groups.

RESULTS

Of 111 patients with aHUS (68 female, 43 male, mean age 33 years) 14% had FH1 germline mutations, including two of eight patients with familial aHUS. For each of these eight patients, both parents were tested, and we were able to trace the mutation for five cases. In the other three cases (one with the mutation 3749 C/T, one with 3200 T/C, and one with 3566+1 G/A), we could not detect the mutation in either parent, although paternity was proven by genetic fingerprinting, suggesting that these subjects have new mutations. C3 was decreased in five mutation carriers but also in two non-carriers, and factor H was decreased in none of the carriers, but elevated in six carriers and 15 non-carriers. Clinical parameters including associated medications and diseases, and outcome of aHUS and of post-aHUS kidney transplantation were similar in the mutation positive and negative groups.

CONCLUSION

FH1 germline mutations occur with considerable frequency in patients with aHUS. Hypocomplementaemia is not regularly associated with a germline mutation, and factor H serum levels can even be elevated. Screening for FH1 mutations contributes to the classification of aHUS.

Recurrence of hemolytic uremic syndrome after live related renal transplantation associated with subsequent de novo disease in the donor

There is a significant risk of disease recurrence in patients with nondiarrheal (D-) hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) undergoing renal transplantation. Recent studies have found that approximately 20% of sporadic cases of HUS have mutations in the gene for the complement regulatory protein factor H. The authors report on 2 families, in each of which a family member initially presented with sporadic HUS and subsequently received a live-related renal transplant, one from a sibling and the other from the father. Subsequently, both recipients suffered recurrent HUS in the allograft, and both donors had HUS within a year of the transplant. Neither family has a factor H mutation. This report underlines the risk of disease recurrence in recipients associated with live-related renal transplantation in HUS and also suggests that the donors may be at risk.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome. Recurrence after renal transplantation. Groupe Coopératif de l'Ile-de-France (GCIF)

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is an uncommon cause of end-stage renal failure in adults, and few data are available concerning the outcome of renal transplantation in these patients. We conducted this retrospective multicentric study to appreciate the outcome of adult renal transplant recipients whose primary disease was HUS. Sixteen patients, transplanted between 1975 and 1995, were included in the study. In each case, initial diagnosis of HUS was documented by a kidney biopsy. These 16 patients received a total of 25 allografts: 1 graft for 9 patients, 2 grafts for 5 patients, and 3 grafts for 2 patients. Nine patients (56%) developed definite clinical and pathologic evidence of recurrence on at least 1 graft. Four additional patients (25%) demonstrated only some clinical or pathologic evidence of recurrence which could not be distinguished from acute vascular rejection. Three patients had no sign of recurrence of the initial disease. The 1-year graft survival rate was 63% and the 5-year graft survival rate was 18.5%. In the group of patients with proven or possible recurrence (n = 13), the 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates were 49% and less than 10%, respectively. The recurrence was an early event, occurring before the end of the first month after transplantation in half the cases. The recurrence rate was 92% in non-nephrectomized patients and 50% in patients with bilateral nephrectomy. In the literature, 71 adult patients with primary HUS had received a total of 90 kidney grafts. Among them, 54% had a recurrence on their graft, which was diagnosed in 52% of the kidney transplants. It is note-worthy that when data from the literature are pooled with our results, the rate of recurrence appears to be significantly lower in binephrectomized patients than in patients with their native kidneys at the time of transplantation (5 of 14 versus 27 of 35 patients, respectively, p = 0.0155). By univariate analysis, no other risk factor for recurrence could be identified. Treatment with cyclosporine A did not influence the recurrence rate. We conclude that recurrence of HUS after renal transplantation is a frequent, early, and severe complication, leading rapidly to graft loss. Prospective studies are needed to confirm that bilateral nephrectomy prior to transplantation decreases the rate of recurrence.

A review of hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients treated with gemcitabine therapy

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare condition that occasionally is reported in cancer patients. Recently it has been observed that gemcitabine rarely may be associated with this condition.

METHODS

The manufacturer's safety database and literature were reviewed for any report regarding gemcitabine associated with renal and hematologic abnormalities. Descriptive analysis was used to examine each case for an association between gemcitabine therapy and HUS and to identify its incidence and risk factors.

RESULTS

Through December 31, 1997, 12 cases were identified that fit either the clinical (uremia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia) or pathologic (renal biopsy) criteria for HUS. There were 7 males (58%) and 5 females (42%) with a median age of 55.5 years (range, 37-73 years). The median duration of gemcitabine therapy was 5.8 months (range, 3.8-13.1 months). Six patients died, five improved, and one patient's outcome was unknown. Among the six deaths, three patients died of cancer progression, one patient died of an unrelated myocardial infarction, and two patients died of HUS or HUS-related complications. For the five patients who improved, treatment was comprised of dialysis, plasmapheresis, splenectomy, or a combination. Attempts to correlate patient demographics, primary malignancy, and cumulative gemcitabine dose failed to identify consistent risk factors in predisposing patients to HUS. Confounding factors were common, including mitomycin-C and/or 5-fluorouracil exposure, advanced stage tumors, or preexisting renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a patient exposure of 78,800, a crude overall incidence rate of 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) was determined, showing that HUS associated with gemcitabine treatment appears to be rare. Nonetheless, as with other cancer treatments, clinicians should weigh the appropriate risk/benefit ratio in using gemcitabine to treat their patients.

A review of hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients treated with gemcitabine therapy

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare condition that occasionally is reported in cancer patients. Recently it has been observed that gemcitabine rarely may be associated with this condition.

METHODS

The manufacturer's safety database and literature were reviewed for any report regarding gemcitabine associated with renal and hematologic abnormalities. Descriptive analysis was used to examine each case for an association between gemcitabine therapy and HUS and to identify its incidence and risk factors.

RESULTS

Through December 31, 1997, 12 cases were identified that fit either the clinical (uremia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia) or pathologic (renal biopsy) criteria for HUS. There were 7 males (58%) and 5 females (42%) with a median age of 55.5 years (range, 37-73 years). The median duration of gemcitabine therapy was 5.8 months (range, 3.8-13.1 months). Six patients died, five improved, and one patient's outcome was unknown. Among the six deaths, three patients died of cancer progression, one patient died of an unrelated myocardial infarction, and two patients died of HUS or HUS-related complications. For the five patients who improved, treatment was comprised of dialysis, plasmapheresis, splenectomy, or a combination. Attempts to correlate patient demographics, primary malignancy, and cumulative gemcitabine dose failed to identify consistent risk factors in predisposing patients to HUS. Confounding factors were common, including mitomycin-C and/or 5-fluorouracil exposure, advanced stage tumors, or preexisting renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a patient exposure of 78,800, a crude overall incidence rate of 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) was determined, showing that HUS associated with gemcitabine treatment appears to be rare. Nonetheless, as with other cancer treatments, clinicians should weigh the appropriate risk/benefit ratio in using gemcitabine to treat their patients.