Clinical and biochemical characteristics of type 2 diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: relationships with insulin requirement

Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation and the discriminative ability of the C-peptide measurement pretransplant among type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies reporting outcomes after pancreas transplantation have included a combination of C-peptide cutoffs and clinical criteria to classify type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, because the kidney is the major site for C-peptide catabolism, C-peptide is unreliable to discriminate the type of diabetes in patients with kidney disease.

METHODS

To improve the discriminative power and better classify the type of diabetes, we used a composite definition to identify T2DM: presence of C-peptide, negative glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody, absence of diabetic ketoacidosis, and use of oral hypoglycemics. Additionally among T2DM patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), body mass index of <30 kg/m(2) and use of <1 u/kg of insulin per day were selection criteria for suitablity for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT). We compared graft and patient survival between T1DM and T2DM after SPKT.

RESULTS

Our study cohort consisted of 80 patients, 10 of whom were assigned as T2DM based on our study criteria. Approximately 15% of patients with T1DM had detectable C-peptide. Cox regression survival analyses found no significant differences in allograft (pancreas and kidney) or patient survival between the 2 groups. The mean creatinine clearance at 1 year estimated by the modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Among those with 1 year of follow-up, all patients with T2DM had glycosylate hemoglobin of <6.0 at 1 year versus 92% of those with T1DM.

CONCLUSION

SPKT should be considered in the therapeutic armamentarium for renal replacement in selected patients with T2DM and ESRD. Use of C-peptide measurements for ESRD patients can be misleading as the sole criterion to determine the type of diabetes.

Icodextrin: an alternative peritoneal dialysis fluid

Peritoneal dialysis is a home dialysis therapy in which a fluid known as dialysate is placed into the patient's peritoneal cavity. The standard dialysate consists of a concentrated dextrose solution. Icodextrin is a glucose polymer that can be substituted for dextrose with avoidance of some of the glucose-dependant effects. The efficacy and safety of this compound was evaluated and compared with the standard dialysate solutions. It seems to be well-tolerated overall and may offer benefits in select populations of patients with kidney failure. This seems to be especially relevant in patients with more permeable peritoneal membranes who are known as 'high-transporters'.

Rosiglitazone Reduces Insulin Requirement and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control is important in determining the outcome of patients with diabetes on dialysis therapy. However, the choice of oral hypoglycemia agent is limited in these patients. Very often, a high dose of insulin is required because of the uremia-associated insulin-resistant state. Rosiglitazone (RSG), a thiazolidinedione, can improve insulin resistance, and its excretion does not rely on renal function. Moreover, it has an anti-inflammatory effect that might be beneficial in patients with renal failure.

METHODS

An open-label randomized study was performed in which 52 patients with type 2 diabetes on peritoneal dialysis therapy administered a constant dosage of subcutaneous insulin with stable glycemic control were randomly assigned to the administration of either RSG (fixed dose, 4 mg) plus insulin or insulin alone. Insulin was titrated to maintain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood glucose at pretreatment levels. Study duration was 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics, HbA1c and glucose levels, insulin requirement, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Insulin requirement was decreased significantly in the RSG group (27.88 +/- 17.6 to 22.4 +/- 15.21 U/d; P < 0.001). There was a significantly greater decrease in insulin dosage in the RSG than control group (-21.5% versus +0.5%; P = 0.03), whereas glycemic control was similar between groups. At the end of the study, the RSG group also had significantly lower CRP levels than the control group (2.21 versus 8.59 mg/L; P = 0.03). No significant increase in such adverse effects as hypoglycemia, liver impairment, and fluid overload was observed in the RSG group. However, the RSG group was associated with more weight gain. Multivariate regression analysis (using decrease in HbA1c and lipid levels, change in insulin dosage, and treatment with RSG, with lipid-lowering agents) showed that only treatment with RSG was an independent predictor for posttreatment CRP level (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

RSG in combination with insulin is well tolerated and beneficial in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes on peritoneal dialysis therapy by improving insulin sensitivity and decreasing inflammatory response.

Prognostic role of serum ACE activity on outcome of type 2 diabetic patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Overexpression of the renin-angiotensin system is important in the pathogenesis of macroangiopathy (MA). Patients with diabetes with end-stage renal failure have elevated serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity compared with their nonuremic counterparts. Because their major cause of death is MA, the significance of serum ACE activity on outcome of this group of patients is studied. We performed a prospective cohort study of 49 patients with type 2 diabetes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) therapy. Baseline serum ACE activity was determined by a modified spectrophotometric method and followed up at a median of 34 months. The prevalence of MA (defined as ischemic heart disease, sudden cardiac arrest, stroke, or peripheral vascular disease) and all-cause mortality rates were studied. Risk for MA is associated with serum ACE activity (median with MA, 69.0 U/L [range, 46.0 to 100.1 U/L] versus without MA, 57.2 U/L [range, 36.3 to 81.0 U/L]; P = 0.02). At the end of follow-up, 48% of patients (24 of 49 patients) died, 70% of MA. The group that died had increased baseline serum ACE activity (nonsurvivors, 65.0 U/L [range, 33.5 to 100.0 U/L] versus survivors, 49.4 U/L [range, 36.4 to 86.5 U/L]; P < 0.05) and MA rates (nonsurvivors, 77% versus survivors, 36%; P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis performed with age, sex, mean blood pressure, body mass index, metabolic control, Kt/V, residual renal function, serum albumin level, and ACE activity showed that baseline serum ACE activity (P = 0.033) is an independent predictor for mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes on CAPD therapy. Among patients with type 2 diabetes on CAPD therapy, serum ACE activity is associated with risk for MA and is an independent predictor for mortality. Whether ACE inhibition will have a beneficial effect on the outcome of these patients needs further investigation.

Contribution of gene polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin system to macroangiopathy in patients with diabetic nephropathy

The renin-angiotensin system is important in the control of hemodynamic status and pathogenesis of macrovascular disease, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy. Serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensinogen (Atg) levels are related to their respective gene polymorphisms. Seventy patients with type 2 diabetes with overt nephropathy (serum creatinine >/= 1.5 mg/dL) were studied. Serum ACE activity was measured by the spectrophotometric method. ACE deletion/insertion (D/I) and Atg M235T genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Patients with and without macroangiopathy were compared. Those with macroangiopathy had increased ACE activity (median, 60.9 U/L; range, 37.9 to 100 U/L versus without macroangiopathy, 47.9 U/L; range, 11.2 to 84.5 U/L; P = 0.01) and prevalence of ACE DD/DI genotypes (DD/DI:II: with macroangiopathy, 61%:39% versus without macroangiopathy, 34%:66%; P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis using age; sex; duration of diabetes; glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid level control; serum creatinine level; and presence of the ACE D allele showed that presence of the D allele (P = 0.03; odds ratio, 1.8; confidence interval, 1.1 to 3.1) and serum creatinine level (P = 0.0007) were independent risk factors for macroangiopathy. Association of the D allele became insignificant after serum ACE activity was included in the analysis in which only serum ACE activity (P = 0.004) and serum creatinine level (P = 0.01) were independent risk factors. Neither Atg M235T nor its synergistic effect with the ACE D allele showed an association with macroangiopathy. In conclusion, the ACE D allele is associated with macroangiopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy. The association is dependent on its effect on serum ACE activity, which is an independent risk factor for the development of macroangiopathy.

Serum C-peptide concentrations poorly phenotype type 2 diabetic end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

A homogeneous patient population is necessary to identify genetic factors that regulate complex disease pathogenesis. In this study, we evaluated clinical and biochemical phenotyping criteria for type 2 diabetes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) probands of families in which nephropathy is clustered. C-peptide concentrations accurately discriminate type 1 from type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function, but have not been extensively evaluated in ESRD patients. We hypothesized that C-peptide concentrations may not accurately reflect insulin synthesis in ESRD subjects, since the kidney is the major site of C-peptide catabolism and would poorly correlate with accepted clinical criteria used to classify diabetics as types 1 and 2.

METHODS

Consenting diabetic ESRD patients (N = 341) from northeastern Ohio were enrolled. Clinical history was obtained by questionnaire, and predialysis blood samples were collected for C-peptide levels from subjects with at least one living diabetic sibling (N = 127, 48% males, 59% African Americans).

RESULTS

Using clinical criteria, 79% of the study population were categorized as type 1 (10%) or type 2 diabetics (69%), while 21% of diabetic ESRD patients could not be classified. In contrast, 98% of the patients were classified as type 2 diabetics when stratified by C-peptide concentrations using criteria derived from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (DCCT) and UREMIDIAB studies. Categorization was concordant in only 70% of ESRD probands when C-peptide concentration and clinical classification algorithms were compared. Using clinical phenotyping criteria as the standard for comparison, C-peptide concentrations classified diabetic ESRD patients with 100% sensitivity, but only 5% specificity. The mean C-peptide concentrations were similar in diabetic ESRD patients (3.2 +/- 1.9 nmol/L) and nondiabetic ESRD subjects (3.5 +/- 1.7 nmol/L, N = 30, P = NS), but were 2.5-fold higher compared with diabetic siblings (1.3 +/- 0.7 nmol/L, N = 30, P < 0.05) with normal renal function and were indistinguishable between type 1 and type 2 diabetics. Although 10% of the diabetic ESRD study population was classified as type 1 diabetics using clinical criteria, only 1.5% of these patients had C-peptide levels less than 0.20 nmol/L, the standard cut-off used to discriminate type 1 from type 2 diabetes in patients with normal renal function. However, the criteria of C-peptide concentrations> 0.50 nmol/L and diabetes onset in patients who are more than 38 years old identify type 2 diabetes with a 97% positive predictive value in our ESRD population.

CONCLUSIONS

Accepted clinical criteria, used to discriminate type 1 and type 2 diabetes, failed to classify a significant proportion of diabetic ESRD patients. In contrast to previous reports, C-peptide levels were elevated in the majority of type 1 ESRD diabetic patients and did not improve the power of clinical parameters to separate them from type 2 diabetic or nondiabetic ESRD subjects. Accurate classification of diabetic ESRD patients for genetic epidemiological studies requires both clinical and biochemical criteria, which may differ from norms used in diabetic populations with normal renal function.