5-HT3 receptor ligands lack discriminative stimulus properties

Synergistic effect between citalopram and muscimol upon induction of anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects in male mice: An isobologram analysis

Background

There is evidence that both the GABAergic system and serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) such as citalopram are involved in the modulation of anxiety and depression processes. In this research, we examined the effects of GABAA receptor agents and citalopram on anxiety- and depression-related behaviors and their interaction in male mice.

Methods

For intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion, a guide cannula was implanted in the left lateral ventricle. Anxiety and depression behaviors were evaluated using the elevated plus-maze (EPM) and forced swimming test (FST).

Results

The results revealed that i.c.v. microinjection of muscimol (1 µg/mouse) enhanced % OAT (open arm time) and % OAE (open arm entries) in the EPM test and decreased immobility time in the FST without affecting locomotor activity, presenting anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like behaviors in the EPM and FST, respectively. On the other hand, i.c.v. microinjection of bicuculline (1 µg/mouse) reduced % OAT and % OAE without affecting locomotor activity and immobility time, presenting an anxiogenic-like effect. Moreover, i.p. administration of citalopram (8 mg/kg) increased %OAT and %OAE and reduced immobility time with no effect on locomotor activity, showing anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like responses in male mice. Furthermore, i.c.v. infusion of an ineffective dosage of muscimol potentiated the anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like responses induced by i.p. injection of citalopram in male mice. When citalopram and bicuculline were co-injected, a non-significant dose of bicuculline reversed the anxiolytic-like effect of citalopram in male mice. Also, the data revealed synergistic anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like behaviors between citalopram and muscimol in male mice.

Conclusions

The results suggested an interaction between citalopram and GABAergic agents on the modulation of anxiety and depression behaviors in male mice.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antidepressant, mirtazapine, in rats: a pharmacological characterization

RATIONALE

Though interoceptive properties of antidepressants have been described, discriminative stimulus (DS) properties of mirtazapine, which does not affect monoamine reuptake, remain uncharacterized.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study are to train rats to recognize a mirtazapine DS, then perform substitution studies with other antidepressants and drugs acting at sites occupied by mirtazapine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule, rats were trained to discriminate mirtazapine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline.

RESULTS

Sessions, 63 +/- 8, were necessary to reach the criterion for 14 rats that all subsequently recognized (100%) mirtazapine at the training dose. Mirtazapine blocks serotonin (5-HT)(2C) receptors, and the 5-HT(2C) antagonists, SB242,084, SB243,213 and S32006, revealed dose-dependent and full (> or =80%) substitution at doses of 2.5, 2.5, and 0.63 mg/kg, respectively. By contrast, the 5-HT(2A) antagonists, MDL100,907 and SR46349-B, the 5-HT(2B) antagonist, SB204,741, and the 5-HT(3) antagonist, ondansetron, showed no significant substitution. Though mirtazapine indirectly recruits 5-HT(1A) receptors, the 5-HT(1A) agonists, buspirone and 8-OH-DPAT, did not substitute. Mirtazapine blocks alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, but several alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists (yohimbine, RX821,002 and atipamezole) failed to substitute. Despite blockade by mirtazapine of histamine H(1) receptors, no substitution was seen with the selective H(1) antagonist, pyrilamine. Finally, the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, reboxetine (0.16), fully substituted for mirtazapine, whereas the 5-HT/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, duloxetine and S33005, several 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine) and the dopamine reuptake inhibitors, bupropion and GBR12,935, did not substitute.

CONCLUSION

Mirtazapine elicits a DS in rats for which selective antagonists at 5-HT(2C) receptors display dose-dependent substitution, whereas drugs acting at other sites recognized by mirtazapine are ineffective.

The role of 5-HT3 receptors in drug abuse and as a target for pharmacotherapy

Alcohol and drug abuse continue to be a major public health problem in the United States and other industrialized nations. Extensive preclinical research indicates the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway and associated regions mediate the rewarding and reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse and natural rewards, such as food and sex. The serotonergic (5-HT) system, in concert with others neurotransmitter systems, plays a key role in modulating neuronal systems within the mesolimbic pathway. A substantial portion of this modulation is mediated by activity at the 5-HT3 receptor. The 5-HT3 receptor is unique among the 5-HT receptors in that it directly gates an ion channel inducing rapid depolarization that, in turn, causes the release of neurotransmitters and/or peptides. Preclinical findings indicate that antagonism of the 5-HT3 receptor in the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens or amygdala reduces alcohol self-administration and/or alcohol-associated effects. Less is known about the effects of 5-HT3 receptor activity on the self-administration of other drugs of abuse or their associated effects. Clinical findings parallel the preclinical findings such that antagonism of the 5-HT3 receptor reduces alcohol consumption and some of its subjective effects. This review provides an overview of the structure, function, and pharmacology of 5-HT3 receptors, the role of these receptors in regulating DA neurotransmission in mesolimbic brain areas, and discusses data from animal and human studies implicating 5-HT3 receptors as targets for the development of new pharmacological agents to treat addictions.

The anxiolytic CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 fails to function as a discriminative stimulus and does not substitute for chlordiazepoxide in rats

RATIONALE

Compounds with a mechanism of action different from benzodiazepines may retain the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines with fewer side effects. CRF(1) antagonists have anxiolytic-like effects but may have different discriminative stimulus (DS) effects compared with benzodiazepines.

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluated the similarity of DS effects of a CRF(1) antagonist DMP696 to the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide and the ability of DMP696 to produce DS effects on its own using drug discrimination procedures, as well as its anxiolytic-like effects after acute or chronic administration.

METHODS

Rats were trained to discriminate chlordiazepoxide (5.0 mg/kg, IP, 30 min prior to session) from vehicle under a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement and drug- or vehicle-lever selection following administration of DMP696 was determined. The effects of DMP696 on latency to exit a dark chamber (defensive withdrawal model of anxiety) were used as an index of anxiolytic-like activity.

RESULTS

In chlordiazepoxide-trained rats, DMP696 (1.0-100 mg/kg, PO) resulted in most of the animals selecting the vehicle lever, as did another anxiolytic, the 5-HT(1A) partial agonist buspirone (0.3-10 mg/kg, IP). DMP696 reduced exit latency in defensive withdrawal at 10 mg/kg administered either acutely or chronically for 14 days. Thus, the doses of DMP696 studied in drug discrimination were up to 10-fold higher than those active in the anxiety model. In addition, DMP696 (10-60 mg/kg, PO) could not be established as a DS under the conditions used in this study. In a subsequent study, chlordiazepoxide was established as a DS in these same animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of substitution of DMP696 for the chlordiazepoxide DS in rats and its inability to acquire DS properties suggest that the DS effects of DMP696 differ from those of benzodiazepines.

Conformationally-restricted analogues and partition coefficients of the 5-HT3 serotonin receptor ligands meta-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG) and meta-chlorophenylguanidine (mCPG)

The present investigation examined two features of arylbiguanide and arylguanidine 5-HT(3) ligands: conformation and partition coefficients. Several conformationally-constrained analogues of mCPBG (2) and mCPG (11; K(i)=32 nM) were prepared and of these only 2-amino-5-chloro-3,4-dihydroquinazoline (14; K(i)=34 nM) retained high affinity. The partition coefficient of compound 11 (LogP(app)=-0.64) was less than that of its corresponding arylbiguanide 2 (LogP(app)=-0.38). The quinazoline structure may represent a pharmacologically-active conformation of these agents, and the arylbiguanides were found more lipid soluble than their arylguanidine counterparts at physiological pH.

Full substitution of the discriminative cue of a 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonist with the combined administration of a 5-HT(1B/2C) and a 5-HT(1A) agonist

The present study examined whether animals attend to the individual components of the cue produced by a drug that stimulates different 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor populations, using a drug discrimination task based on the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. The training drug was indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate) (INDO) that has been described as a 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) agonist able to exert discriminative control in both operant and CTA procedures. The principal objective was to examine generalization with the combined administration of agonists for the different receptor sites that may mimic the mechanism of action of the training drug. Male Wistar rats, deprived of water, were trained to discriminate INDO from saline; during the drug trials, the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-LiCl pairings, while, during the saline trials, the administration of saline preceded the saccharin-saline pairings. In generalization tests, INDO, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, a 5-HT(1A) agonist), 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP, a 5-HT(1B) agonist), alpha-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(2C) agonist) or 2-methyl-5-HT (a 5-HT(3) agonist), were administered alone or in combination. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT, TFMPP and alpha-methyl-5-HT produced dose-dependent generalization, up to 88% in the case of 8-OH-DPAT. The combined administration of the following pairs of drugs, 8-OH-DPAT+TFMPP or 8-OH-DPAT+ alpha-methyl-5-HT, at doses that produced only 15-55% generalization when administered alone, produced greater than 80% generalization to INDO. However, the single administration of 2-methyl-5-HT produced only saline-like responding and its combined administration with 8-OH-DPAT did not modify the generalization produced by the single administration of 8-OH-DPAT. These results suggest that animals attend to the individual components of the drug cue; in the case of INDO, which has three elements, each mediated by a different receptor subpopulation (5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2C) ), the separate stimulation of at least two receptor subpopulations was 'interpreted' by the subject as the presence of the training drug.