1
|
Acute coronary syndromes in diabetic patients, outcome, revascularization, and antithrombotic therapy. Biomed Pharmacother 2022; 148:112772. [PMID: 35245735 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetes exacerbates the progression of atherosclerosis and is associated with increased risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Approximatively 25-30% of patients admitted for ACS have diabetes. ACS occurs earlier in diabetics and is associated with increased mortality and a higher risk of recurrent ischemic events. An increased proinflammatory and prothrombotic state is involved in the poorer outcomes of diabetic patients. In the past decade advancement in both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) techniques and more potent antiplatelet drugs like prasugrel and ticagrelor improved outcomes of diabetic patients with ACS, but this population still experiences worse outcomes compared to non-diabetic patients. While in ST elevation myocardial infarction urgent PCI is the method of choice for revascularization, in patients with non-ST elevation ACS an early invasive approach is suggested by the guidelines, but in the setting of multivessel (MV) or complex coronary artery disease (CAD) the revascularization strategy is less clear. This review describes the accumulating evidence regarding factors involved in promoting increased incidence and poor prognosis of ACS in patients with diabetes, the evolution over time of prognosis and outcomes, revascularization strategies and antithrombotic therapy studied until now.
Collapse
|
2
|
Biswas S, Dinh D, Andrianopoulos N, Lefkovits J, Ajani A, Duffy SJ, Chan W, Walton A, Brennan A, Clark DJ, Hiew C, Oqueli E, Reid CM, Stub D, Eccleston D. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated Versus Non-Insulin Treated Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2021; 148:36-43. [PMID: 33667454 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
There are conflicting data on whether patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) have poorer outcomes compared with non-insulin treated diabetic (non-ITDM) patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore compared clinical outcomes following PCI in ITDM versus non-ITDM patients. We prospectively collected data on 4,579 patients with diabetes underwent PCI between 2005 and 2014 in a large multicenter registry and dichotomized them as having ITDM (n = 1,111) or non-ITDM (n = 3,468). The non-ITDM group was further divided into diet control only (diet-DM; n = 786) and those taking oral hypoglycemic agents (OHG-DM; n = 2,639), and clinical outcomes were compared with ITDM patients. Median follow-up for long-term mortality was 4.2 years (IQR 2.0 to 6.6 years). ITDM patients were more likely to be female, obese, and have severe renal impairment (all p <0.001). Procedural characteristics were similar other than a greater use of drug-eluting stents in ITDM patients. On multivariable analysis, ITDM was an independent predictor of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to1.55, p = 0.03). Dividing the non-ITDM group further by treatment, a progressively higher rate of 12-month MACCE across the 3 groups was observed (13.5% vs 17.9% vs 21.8%; p <0.001). Long-term mortality was similar in the diet-DM and OHG-DM groups, but significantly higher in the ITDM group on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p <0.001). In conclusion, there is a clear gradient of adverse outcomes with escalation of therapy from diet control to OHGs to insulin.
Collapse
|
3
|
Factors Associated With the Use of Bare Metal Stents in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2020; 21:1489-1492. [PMID: 32448777 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug eluting stents (DES) are used in the majority of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Factors associated with the use of bare metal stents (BMS) for patients undergoing primary PCI for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not been adequately explored. The objective of this study was to evaluate factors associated with BMS use in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. METHODS Patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI between January 2008 and February 2015 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received both a DES and BMS were included in the DES group and patients receiving balloon angioplasty only were excluded. Baseline demographics, angiographic variables, procedure related variables and in-hospital events were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with BMS use. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty-five patients underwent primary PCI for STEMI during the study period. Seventy-two patients (8.3%) received balloon angioplasty only and were excluded, yielding 793 patients for the study cohort. Three hundred fifty-two patients (44%) received BMS and 441 patients (56%) received DES. Patients receiving DES had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, prior PCI, left anterior descending artery culprit location and Medicaid Insurance compared to those receiving BMS. Patients receiving BMS had a higher prevalence of cardiogenic shock and right coronary artery culprit location. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was significantly higher for patients receiving BMS compared to patients receiving DES, 11.1% vs 3.2%, respectively, p < 0.0001. Multivariate predictors of BMS use were cardiogenic shock (OR 30.3; 95% CI 11.25 to 81.73) and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.04 to 8.64). CONCLUSION In a contemporary series of patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI, BMS were used in 44% of patients and independent factors associated with BMS use were cardiogenic shock and diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chandiramani R, Mehran R. Examining the role of diabetes mellitus in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 94:926-927. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Chandiramani
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
| | - Roxana Mehran
- The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jimenez-Quevedo P, Brugaletta S, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Mainar V, Campo G, Tespili M, Nombela-Franco L, Del Trigo M, Gonzalo N, Escaned J, Salinas P, Nuñez-Gil I, Fernandez-Perez C, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Serruys PW, Sabate Tenas M. Long-term impact of diabetes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from the EXAMINATION randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 94:917-925. [PMID: 30895706 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes of diabetic patients suffering from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with second-generation drug-eluting stent have been scarcely evaluated. The aim of this posthoc subanalysis of the EXAMINATION trial was to compare 5-year outcomes according to the presence of diabetes mellitus. METHODS From a total of 1,497 patients included in the trial, 258 were diabetics (n = 137, received everolimus-eluting stent (EES) and n = 121 bare-metal stent (BMS); whereas 1,239 were nondiabetics (n = 613 treated with EES and n = 626 with BMS). Patient-oriented combined endpoint (POCE) defined as all-cause death, any MI or any revascularization, and other clinical parameters were collected up to 5-years. All results were adjusted for various potential confounders. RESULTS At 5-years, patients with diabetes showed similar rates of POCE between diabetics treated with EES and those treated with BMS (32.8% vs. 32.2%; p = 0.88). However, rates of TLR were significantly lower in the EES group (4.4% vs. 9.9%; HR 0.52 (0.29-0.94); P = 0.03). In non-diabetics, the use of EES was associated with a significant improvement in all-clinical parameters except for MI rate: POCE: [10.0% vs. 12.6%; HR 0.78(0.62-0.98); P = 0.038], all cause death: [7.0% vs. 12.1%; HR 0.62(0.42-0.90); P = 0.014], and [TLR: 4.2 vs. 6.7; HR 0.60 (0.37-0.98); P = 0.04]. Overall, diabetics showed higher rate of POCE at 5-years (32.6% vs. 21.5% in nondiabetics HR1.45[1.03-2.04];p = 0.03) driven by increased rates of MI and the need for revascularization that occurred in coronary segments remote from target lesions [2.7% vs. 1.1%; HR: 2.27 (1.12-5.23); P = 0.02 and 14% vs. 6.2%; HR: 2.11 (1.38-3.22); P = 0.001, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS Diabetics had worse clinical outcomes than nondiabetics after STEMI mainly due to atherosclerosis progression. At 5-years, the treatment with EES did not reduce the rate of POCE in diabetics but reduced the need for revascularization compared with BMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Salvatore Brugaletta
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angel Cequier
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Iñiguez
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital do Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain
| | - Antonio Serra
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vicente Mainar
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Hospital General of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Maurizio Tespili
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital Bolognini Seriate, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Luis Nombela-Franco
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Del Trigo
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nieves Gonzalo
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Escaned
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Salinas
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan Nuñez-Gil
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Fernandez-Perez
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Fernández-Ortiz
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Macaya
- Interventional Cardiology Department, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- Interventional Cardiology Department, International Centre of Circulatory Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Manel Sabate Tenas
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kroschwald LM, Tauer JT, Kroschwald SI, Suttorp M, Wiedenfeld A, Beissert S, Bauer A, Rauner M. Imatinib mesylate and nilotinib decrease synthesis of bone matrix in vitro. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:2102-2108. [PMID: 31423283 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as imatinib (IMA) and nilotinib (NIL), are the cornerstone of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment via the blockade of the oncogenic BCR-ABL1 fusion protein. However, skeletal side effects are commonly observed in pediatric patients receiving long-term treatment with IMA. Additionally, in vitro studies have shown that IMA and NIL alter vitamin D metabolism, which may further impair bone metabolism. To determine whether TKIs directly affect bone cell function, the present study treated the human osteoblastic cell line SaOS-2 with IMA or NIL and assessed effects on their mineralization capacity as well as mRNA expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two cytokines that regulate osteoclastogenesis. Both TKIs significantly inhibited mineralization and downregulated osteoblast marker genes, including alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, osterix, as well as genes associated with the pro-osteogenic Wnt signaling pathway; NIL was more potent than IMA. In addition, both TKIs increased the RANKL/OPG ratio, which is known to stimulate osteoclastogenesis. The present results suggested that the TKIs IMA and NIL directly inhibited osteoblast differentiation and directly promoted a pro-osteoclastogenic environment through the RANKL-OPG signaling axis. Thus, we propose that future work is required to determine whether the bone health of CML patients undergoing TKI-treatment should be routinely monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lysann Michaela Kroschwald
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.,Centre for Translational Bone, Joint and Soft Tissue Research, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Josephine Tabea Tauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Shriners Hospital for Children, McGill University, Montreal QC H4A 0A9, Canada
| | - Sonja Ingrid Kroschwald
- Simon Alberti Group, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, D-01307 Dresden, Germany.,Institute for Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Meinolf Suttorp
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Anne Wiedenfeld
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Martina Rauner
- Department of Medicine III and Center for Healthy Aging, Medical Faculty, Technical University Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krackhardt F, Waliszewski M, Rischner J, Piot C, Pansieri M, Ruiz-Poveda FL, Boxberger M, Noutsias M, Ríos XF, Kherad B. Nine-month clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes treated with polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents and 6‑month vs. 12‑month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Herz 2018; 44:433-439. [PMID: 29356832 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-017-4675-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus is known to be associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). Defining the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after DES implantation is still under debate. The objective of this subgroup analysis of the all-comers ISAR 2000 registry was to assess the safety and efficacy of a short DAPT (<6 month) versus a longer DAPT (>6 month) in patients with diabetes electively treated with the polymer-free sirolimus-coated ultrathin strut drug-eluting stent (PF-SES). METHODS Patients who received the PF-SES were investigated in a multicenter all-comers observational study. The primary endpoint was the 9‑month target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, whereas secondary endpoints included the 9‑month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and procedural success rates. RESULTS In all, 167 patients were treated with DAPT for ≤6 months (S-DAPT group) and 350 patients underwent DAPT treatment for 12 months (L-DAPT group). There was no significant difference in the overall MACE rate (4.6% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.441), the 9‑month accumulated stent thrombosis rates (0.8% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.51), or the accumulated rate of bleeding complications (5.3% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.341). CONCLUSION PF-SES are safe and effective in daily clinical routine with low rates of TLR and MACE in patients with diabetes and stable disease. Our data suggest that extending the duration of DAPT beyond 6 months does not improve MACE or TLR at 9 months in patients with stable CAD (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02629575).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Krackhardt
- Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Waliszewski
- Medical Scientific Affairs, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Rischner
- Hôpital Albert Schweitzer Colmar, Colmar, France
| | - C Piot
- Clinique du Millénaire Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - M Pansieri
- Centre Hospitalier d'Avigon, Avignon, France
| | - F L Ruiz-Poveda
- Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - M Boxberger
- Medical Scientific Affairs, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Noutsias
- Midgerman Heart Center, Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Medical Care, University Hospital Halle, Martin-Luther-University Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - X F Ríos
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, Coruña, Spain
| | - B Kherad
- Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Baumbach A, Heg D, Räber L, Ostoijc M, Brugaletta S, Strange JW, Johnson TW, Juni P, Engstrøm T, Serruys PW, Sabate M, Windecker S. Selective use of contemporary drug-eluting stents in primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: pooled analysis of COMFORTABLE AMI and EXAMINATION. EUROINTERVENTION 2017; 12:1577-1586. [PMID: 27998831 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-15-00408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Selective use of DES only in patients at higher risk of MACE is common practice, particularly in healthcare systems with a large premium payable for DES. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients in which the use of BMS in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for STEMI can still be justified. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of COMFORTABLE AMI and EXAMINATION comparing contemporary DES with BMS in PPCI. A risk score was applied using three parameters: lesion length >15 mm, vessel size <3 mm, and diabetes mellitus. Individual data were available for 2,655 patients. The incidence of MACE at one year was incrementally higher in patients with risk scores of 1 or 2/3. MACE rates were lower in patients with a risk score 0 or 1 who were treated with DES (p=0.0073 and p=0.008). No difference in death or reinfarction was seen between DES and BMS in any group. There was a significant reduction in TLR with DES in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS A score comprising vessel size, lesion length, and diabetes did not identify patients at low risk with equivalent or better results from BMS use. The results suggest that the practice of only selective use of DES in primary PCI should be discouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Baumbach
- Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karjalainen PP, Airaksinen JKE, de Belder A, Romppanen H, Kervinen K, Sia J, Laine M, Nammas W. Long-term outcome of early percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BASE ACS trial. Ann Med 2016; 48:376-83. [PMID: 27238465 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1186829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BASE ACS trial demonstrated an outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents (BAS) that was non-inferior to everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We performed a post-hoc analysis of diabetic versus non-diabetic patients from the trial. METHODS We randomised 827 patients (1:1) with ACS to receive either BAS or EES. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) or ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Follow-up was planned yearly through 7 years. RESULTS Of 827 patients, 140 (16.9%) were diabetic; of these, 36 (25.7%) were insulin-treated. Mean follow-up duration was 4.2 ± 1.9 years. MACE was more frequent in diabetics versus non-diabetics (23.6% versus 13.7%, respectively, p = 0.003), mainly driven by more frequent cardiac death (7.9% versus 2.2%, respectively, p = 0.002). The rates of non-fatal MI, ischaemia-driven TLR were comparable (p > 0.05 for all). In diabetic patients, MACE was comparable between the two stent arms (18.5% versus 28.0%, for BAS versus EES, respectively, p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS Diabetic patients treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention for ACS had worse long-term outcome, compared with non-diabetics, mainly driven by more frequent cardiac death. The long-term outcome of BAS was comparable to EES in diabetics. Key Messages Diabetic patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome who were treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention had worse long-term clinical outcome, compared with non-diabetics, mainly driven by a high incidence of cardiac death. Age independently predicted both major adverse cardiac events and cardiac death in diabetic patients. The long-term clinical outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents was comparable to that of everolimus-eluting stents in the diabetic, as well as in the non-diabetic subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Adam de Belder
- c Department of Cardiology , Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust , Brighton , UK
| | - Hannu Romppanen
- d Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, and University of Oulu , Oulu , Finland
| | - Kari Kervinen
- d Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, and University of Oulu , Oulu , Finland
| | - Jussi Sia
- e Department of Cardiology , Kokkola Central Hospital , Kokkola , Finland
| | - Mika Laine
- f Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki , Finland
| | - Wail Nammas
- a Heart Center, Satakunta Central Hospital , Pori , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bundhun PK, Soogund MZS, Pursun M, Chen MH. Stent thrombosis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed between six months and five years with sirolimus-eluting stents and other drug-eluting stents in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4130. [PMID: 27399125 PMCID: PMC5058854 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare 6 months to 5 years stent thrombosis (ST) and adverse cardiovascular outcomes associated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and other drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing SES with other DES in patients with T2DM. Total ST, definite ST, probable ST, and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes reported between 6 months and 5 years were considered as the clinical end points in this study. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for categorical variables and the pooled analyses were performed with RevMan 5.3 software.Twenty-nine studies involving a total number of 25,729 patients with diabetes were included in this meta-analysis. SES were not associated with significantly higher total, definite, and probable STs with OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.77-1.17, P = 0.62; OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.65-1.37, P = 0.76; and OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.77-1.45, P = 0.74, respectively. SES were also noninferior to the other non-sirolimus eluting drug eluting stents (non-SE DES) in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke with OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.82-1.03, P = 0.16; OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.88-1.35, P = 0.44; OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80-1.06, P = 0.26; and OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.49-1.28, P = 0.43, respectively. Target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events were also similarly reported between SES and non-SE DES with OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.83-1.31, P = 0.72; OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.95-1.64, P = 0.11; and OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.90-1.25, P = 0.49, respectively.During this particular follow-up period, SES were not associated with any increase in ST among these patients with T2DM. Mortality and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes were also not significantly different between these 2 groups. Hence, SES should be considered neither superior nor inferior to other DES. They are expected to be equally effective and safe to use in patients with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manish Pursun
- Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China
| | - Meng-Hua Chen
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital
- Correspondence: Meng-Hua Chen, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530027, PR China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tuomainen PO, Sia J, Nammas W, Niemelä M, Airaksinen JK, Biancari F, Karjalainen PP. Análisis combinado de dos ensayos aleatorizados de comparación de stents con recubrimiento de titanio-óxido nítrico con stents liberadores de fármacos en el IAMCEST. Rev Esp Cardiol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2014.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Tuomainen PO, Sia J, Nammas W, Niemelä M, Airaksinen JKE, Biancari F, Karjalainen PP. Pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent versus drug-eluting stent in STEMI. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 67:531-7. [PMID: 24952392 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We performed a pooled analysis based on patient-level data from the TITAX-AMI and BASE-ACS trials to evaluate the outcome of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents vs drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at 2-year follow-up. METHODS The TITAX-AMI trial compared bioactive stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents in 425 patients with acute myocardial infarction. The BASE-ACS trial compared bioactive stents with everolimus-eluting stents in 827 patients with acute coronary syndrome. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was major adverse cardiac events: a composite of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS The pooled analysis included 501 patients; 245 received bioactive stents, and 256 received drug-eluting stents. The pooled bioactive stent group was associated with a risk ratio of 0.85 for major adverse cardiac events (95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.35; P=.49) compared to the pooled drug-eluting stent group. Similarly, the pooled bioactive stent group was associated with a risk ratio of 0.71 for cardiac death (95% confidence interval, 0.26-1.95; P=.51), 0.44 for recurrent myocardial infarction (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.97; P=.04), and 1.39 for ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.59; P=.30), compared to the pooled drug-eluting stent group. These results were confirmed by propensity-score adjusted analysis of the combined datasets. CONCLUSIONS In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, bioactive stents were associated with lower rates of recurrent myocardial infarction compared to drug-eluting stents at 2-year follow-up; yet, the rates of cardiac death and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petri O Tuomainen
- Department of Internal Medicine and Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Cardiology, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| | - Jussi Sia
- Department of Cardiology, Kokkola Central Hospital, Kokkola, Finland
| | - Wail Nammas
- Department of Cardiology, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| | - Matti Niemelä
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Fausto Biancari
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oulu, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hee L, Mussap CJ, Yang L, Dignan R, Kadappu KK, Juergens CP, Thomas L, French JK. Outcomes of coronary revascularization (percutaneous or bypass) in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110:643-8. [PMID: 22632829 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2012] [Revised: 04/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing coronary revascularization have not been extensively evaluated, we sought to examine outcomes in a diabetic cohort of 195 consecutive patients with MVD characterized by SYNTAX scores (SSs) undergoing nonrandomized revascularization, 102 (52%) by percutaneous intervention (PCI) and 93 (48%) by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at Liverpool Hospital (Sydney, Australia) from June 2006 to March 2010. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median term of 14 months. The overall median SS was 44, with significantly higher SSs in CABG- than PCI-treated patients (48 vs 39, p <0.0001). There was a similar incidence of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in PCI- and CABG-treated patients (6.1% vs 8.3%, p = 0.383; 12% vs 4.9%, p = 0.152; 3.1% vs 3.5%, p = 0.680 respectively). However, the rates of target vessel revascularization and major adverse coronary and cerebral event were significantly higher in PCI-treated patients than in those undergoing CABG (20% vs 1.2%, p <0.0001; 29% vs 15%, p = 0.034). Despite a much higher SS, patients who underwent PCI achieved comparable outcomes at 1 year to those with diabetes mellitus and a SS ≥ 33 as reported in the SYNTAX trial. In conclusion, in this single-center nonrandomized observational study, coronary revascularization by PCI is associated with increased major adverse coronary and cerebral events at 1-year follow-up, predominantly driven by a high rate of target vessel revascularization. Thus, CABG should remain the revascularization procedure of choice for diabetic patients with MVD and high SSs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jensen LO, Maeng M, Thayssen P, Tilsted HH, Terkelsen CJ, Kaltoft A, Lassen JF, Hansen KN, Ravkilde J, Christiansen EH, Madsen M, Sørensen HT, Thuesen L. Influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109:629-35. [PMID: 22152969 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2011] [Revised: 10/10/2011] [Accepted: 10/10/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a worse outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than nondiabetic patients. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and death in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with primary PCI for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) in Western Denmark. From January 2002 through June 2005, 3,655 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI and stent implantation (316 patients with DM, 8.6%; 3,339 patients without DM, 91.4%) were recorded in the Western Denmark Heart Registry. All patients were followed for 3 years. Cox regression analysis was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs), controlling for potential confounding. Three-year rates of definite stent thrombosis were 1.6% in the DM group and 1.5% in the non-DM group (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 2.67). The rate of MI was 12.3% in the DM group versus 5.6% in the non-DM group (adjusted HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.81 to 3.61). Rates of TLR were 12.1% in the DM group and 8.7% in the non-DM group (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.11). All-cause mortality was 23.7% in patients with DM versus 12.7% in patients without DM (adjusted HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.59). In conclusion, stent thrombosis rate was similar in patients with and without DM and STEMI treated with primary PCI, whereas the presence of DM increased the risk of MI, TLR, and death.
Collapse
|
15
|
Sabaté M, Cequier A, Iñiguez A, Serra A, Hernández-Antolín R, Mainar V, Valgimigli M, Tespili M, den Heijer P, Bethencourt A, Vázquez N, Brugaletta S, Backx B, Serruys P. Rationale and design of the EXAMINATION trial: a randomised comparison between everolimus-eluting stents and cobalt-chromium bare-metal stents in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. EUROINTERVENTION 2011; 7:977-984. [DOI: 10.4244/eijv7i8a154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
16
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gjin Ndrepepa
- From the Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Lamin King
- From the Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Adnan Kastrati
- From the Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Witzenbichler B, Wöhrle J, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Kornowski R, Hartmann F, Hood KL, Parise H, Lansky AJ, Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Stone GW. Paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4:130-8. [PMID: 21364152 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.110.960245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the prospective, randomized Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) safely reduced the rates of ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with bare metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. Diabetes mellitus is a known predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous intervention in STEMI. We therefore sought to assess the impact of PES in diabetic patients with STEMI from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 478 patients with diabetes and 2527 without diabetes were randomly assigned to receive PES versus BMS. The 12-month rates of ischemic TLR were significantly reduced by PES compared with BMS in both diabetic (11.2% versus 5.2%; hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.45 [0.21 to 0.93]; P=0.03) and nondiabetic (6.8% versus 4.3%, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.63 [0.44 to 0.92]; P=0.02) patients. In patients with insulin-treated diabetes, PES compared with BMS reduced the 12-month TLR rate from 21.4% to 7.3% (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]=0.35 [0.12 to 1.03]; P=0.046). Angiographic late loss and binary restenosis at 13 months were also significantly reduced in PES-treated diabetic patients. There were no significant differences between the BMS and PES groups in the 12-month rates of death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis in either diabetic or nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS In the large-scale, prospective, randomized HORIZONS-AMI trial, implantation of PES compared with BMS in patients with STEMI and diabetes mellitus resulted in significant reductions in ischemia-driven TLR and angiographic restenosis at 1 year, with comparable safety outcomes, including stent thrombosis. These results suggest that PES can safely be used to reduce restenosis in high-risk diabetic patients presenting with STEMI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00433966.
Collapse
|
18
|
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011; 27:11-22. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462310001340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Recent concerns have been raised for the safety after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation compared with the use of bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study was to estimate the relative impact of DES versus BMS on mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis (ST) in STEMI patients by performing comprehensive meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.Methods: We performed an electronic search and manual search of studies presented through September 2009, without language restrictions. An approach of “using systematic reviews” was used. Two independent reviewers extracted prespecified data from each study. A random-effects model was used to combine trials and to perform stratified analyses based on study designs and the duration of follow-up.Results: Fourteen RCTs were identified (N = 7,654). Compared with BMS, DES significantly reduced TVR (risk ratio [RR], 0.48; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.56) and MI (RR, 0.77; 95 percent CI, 0.61–0.97), without increasing mortality (RR, 0.88; 95 percent CI, 0.70–1.10) and ST (RR, 0.93; 95 percent CI, 0.72–1.21). Among 35 observational studies (N = 44,849), the use of DES was associated with a significant reduction in mortality (RR, 0.85; 95 percent CI, 0.79–0.91) and TVR (RR, 0.61; 95 percent CI, 0.48–0.77). MI and ST were significantly lower in the DES group within 1-year follow-up, but there were no differences within 2 years of follow-up. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity and publication bias.Conclusions: These data in aggregate suggest that using DES in STEMI patients is safe and efficacious, but there are differences between RCT and observational data comparing DES and BMS.
Collapse
|
19
|
Pan XH, Chen YX, Xiang MX, Xu G, Wang JA. A meta-analysis of randomized trials on clinical outcomes of paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2011; 11:754-61. [PMID: 20872982 DOI: 10.1631/jzus.b0900302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A meta-analysis was performed to address the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all randomized clinical trials in mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (rMI), repeat revascularization (RR), and stent thrombosis (ST). A total of 4190 STEMI patients were enrolled in six randomized trials comparing PES with bare-metal stent (BMS). The pooled repeat revascularization rate was 5.7% in PES group, significantly lower than 10.0% in BMS group with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.44, 0.72] (P<0.00001). No significant difference was found between PES and BMS groups in mortality at one year after the indexing procedure (3.9% vs. 5.1%, OR 0.88, 95% CI [0.63, 1.21], P=0.42). Similarly, rMI rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (3.4% vs. 4.1%, OR 0.80, 95% CI [0.56, 1.13], P=0.21). PES was also associated with the comparable pooled rate of definite stent thrombosis with BMS (2.3% vs. 2.4%, OR 0.81, 95% CI [0.52, 1.26], P=0.35). The results show that PES improved clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with a decreased need for repeat revascularization and no concerns for safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-hong Pan
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Waha A, Dibra A, Kufner S, Baumgart D, Sabate M, Maresta A, Schömig A, Kastrati A. Long-term outcome after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Res Cardiol 2011; 100:561-70. [PMID: 21221607 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-010-0278-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2010] [Accepted: 12/23/2010] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is widely believed that patients with diabetes mellitus obtain the greatest benefit from drug-eluting stents, convincing evidence on long-term efficacy and safety of these stents is lacking. METHODS We performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data from four randomized trials including 583 patients comparing sirolimus eluting with bare metal stents (median follow-up of 4.2 years). These were the only specific trials reporting on drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major cardiac events. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction as a safety endpoint and target lesion re-intervention as an efficacy endpoint. Stent thrombosis was also evaluated. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in the overall hazard of major cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.63, P < 0.001) with sirolimus-eluting stents. This was mostly due to a significant reduction in the overall hazard of repeat revascularization (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.41, P < 0.001) in favor of sirolimus-eluting stents. However, the overall hazard of death (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59-1.41, P = 0.68) as well as death or myocardial infarction (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54-1.09, P = 0.14) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were observed regarding stent thrombosis (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15-1.69, P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS Sirolimus-eluting stents are highly effective in reducing the risk for major cardiac events and safe in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette de Waha
- Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
In recent decades, the increased use of novel pharmacologic therapies and primary percutaneous coronary intervention has considerably improved survival in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Nevertheless, optimal management and care of particular subgroups of patients such as the elderly and individuals with diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, or cardiogenic shock are still debated. In fact, because of their clinically relevant comorbidities, these patients are often excluded from randomized trials; thus, data are largely limited to those from retrospective cohorts or subgroup analyses of large clinical studies. These particular subgroups of patients require special management during and after prompt mechanical reperfusion because of their high risk of both thrombotic and bleeding events. Therefore, cardiologists should accurately assess the risk-benefit equation before administrating and dosing currently available antithrombotic and antiplatelets agents in these high-risk populations.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients who present with acute myocardial infarction and are treated with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2010; 105:819-25. [PMID: 20211325 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2009] [Revised: 11/08/2009] [Accepted: 11/08/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at a greater risk of mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention than those without DM. We aimed to determine whether differences exist in the long-term mortality of patients with versus without DM who present with acute myocardial infarction and receive drug-eluting stents. Data were collected on 161 patients with and 395 without DM referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction and treated with drug-eluting stents. The patients with cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The 1-year major cardiac event (MACE) rates, defined as death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization, were compared between the 2 groups. The patients with DM were sicker at baseline. The MACE rates at 1 year were significantly increased in those with DM compared to those without DM. This was primarily driven by all-cause mortality. No differences in Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, type of drug-eluting stents used, or procedure-related renal failure were seen. No differences were found in death or MACE rates at 1 year after adjusting for age, gender, race, systemic hypertension, peripheral artery disease, and a history of chronic renal failure between the 2 groups (weighted log-rank statistic, p = 0.37 and p = 0.37, respectively). In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, those with DM were sicker than those without DM. In conclusion, after correction for co-morbid conditions, no difference was seen in the 1-year MACE or death rates between those with and without DM who presented with acute myocardial infarction and were treated with drug-eluting stents.
Collapse
|
24
|
Albarrán A, Mauri J, Pinar E, Baz JA. Actualización en cardiología intervencionista. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010; 63 Suppl 1:86-100. [DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(10)70143-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Ng VG, Stone GW. Diabetics and drug-eluting stents in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: confidence in numbers. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009; 62:343-6. [PMID: 19401117 DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)71659-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
26
|
Diabéticos y stents liberadores de fármacos en el infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST: confianza en las cifras. Rev Esp Cardiol 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(09)70889-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|