1
|
A computational microscope focused on the sense of smell. Biochimie 2014; 107 Pt A:3-10. [PMID: 24952349 DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 06/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we review studies of the protagonists of the perception of smell focusing on Odorant-Binding Proteins and Olfactory Receptors. We notably put forward studies performed by means of molecular modeling, generally combined with experimental data. Those works clearly emphasize that computational approaches are now a force to reckon with. In the future, they will certainly be more and more used, notably in the framework of a computational microscope meant to observe how the laws of physics govern the biomolecular systems originating our sense of smell.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshioka T, Sakakibara M. Physical aspects of sensory transduction on seeing, hearing and smelling. Biophysics (Nagoya-shi) 2013; 9:183-91. [PMID: 27493557 PMCID: PMC4629681 DOI: 10.2142/biophysics.9.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
What is the general principle of sensory transduction? Sensory transduction is defined as energy transformation from the external world to the internal world. The energy of the external world, such as thermal energy (heat), electro-magnetic energy (light), mechanical energy (sound) and the energy from molecules (chemicals), is converted into electrochemical events in the animal nervous system. The following five classes of special sense receptors are utilized for energy conversion: vision (photo); audition (sound); taste and smell (chemo); and tactile (mechano). There are also other special sense receptors, including thermo and noxious receptors. The focus of this study is on photoreceptors, sound-receptors and odorant-receptors because the transduction mechanisms of these receptors are explained biochemically and understood by a common physical principle; these biochemical models are well known in neuroscience. The following notable problems are inherent in these biochemical models: the cGMP ionophore model of the vertebrate photoreceptor cannot explain the fast photo-response (∼msec); the tip links connection model of stereocilia in the basilar membrane for opening the K(+) channel on the tip of a hair has difficulty explaining the high frequency vibration of hair cells without a damping of the oscillation, and the odorant shape-specific receptor model for olfactory transduction has difficulty in discriminating the minute differences among similar fragrant smells of essential oils with different molecular shapes. These difficulties might arise from a lack of the physical sense when the transduction models were proposed. This article will reconsider these problems and propose rational models for visual, olfactory and auditory transduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tohru Yoshioka
- Waseda University, Professor Emeritus, Graduate Institute of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Manabu Sakakibara
- Tokai University, School of High-Technology for Human Welfare, 317 Nishino, Numazu, Shizuoka 410-0321, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Anselmi C, Buonocore A, Centini M, Facino RM, Hatt H. The human olfactory receptor 17-40: requisites for fitting into the binding pocket. Comput Biol Chem 2011; 35:159-68. [PMID: 21704262 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2011.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2011] [Accepted: 04/26/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
To gain structural insight on the interactions between odorants and the human olfactory receptor, we did homology modelling of the receptor structure, followed by molecular docking simulation with ligands. Molecular dynamics simulation on the structures resulting from docking served to estimate the binding free energy of the various odorant families. A correlation with the odorous properties of the ligands is proposed. We also investigated which residues were involved in the binding of a set of properly synthesised ligands and which were required for fitting inside the binding pocket. Olfactive stimulation of the olfactory receptor with odorous molecules was also investigated, using calcium imaging or electrophysiological recordings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Anselmi
- Dipartimento Farmaco Chimico Tecnologico - Centro Interdipartimentale di Scienza e Tecnologia Cosmetiche, University of Siena, Via della Diana 2, 53100 Siena, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomez-Marin A, Duistermars BJ, Frye MA, Louis M. Mechanisms of odor-tracking: multiple sensors for enhanced perception and behavior. Front Cell Neurosci 2010; 4:6. [PMID: 20407585 PMCID: PMC2854573 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2010.00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2010] [Accepted: 03/10/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Early in evolution, the ability to sense and respond to changing environments must have provided a critical survival advantage to living organisms. From bacteria and worms to flies and vertebrates, sophisticated mechanisms have evolved to enhance odor detection and localization. Here, we review several modes of chemotaxis. We further consider the relevance of a striking and recurrent motif in the organization of invertebrate and vertebrate sensory systems, namely the existence of two symmetrical olfactory sensors. By combining our current knowledge about the olfactory circuits of larval and adult Drosophila, we examine the molecular and neural mechanisms underlying robust olfactory perception and extend these analyses to recent behavioral studies addressing the relevance and function of bilateral olfactory input for gradient detection. Finally, using a comparative theoretical approach based on Braitenberg's vehicles, we speculate about the relationships between anatomy, circuit architecture and stereotypical orientation behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Gomez-Marin
- EMBL-CRG Systems Biology Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Triller A, Boulden E, Churchill A, Hatt H, Englund J, Spehr M, Sell C. Odorant–Receptor Interactions and Odor Percept: A Chemical Perspective. Chem Biodivers 2008; 5:862-86. [DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.200890101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
Most animal species rely on odorant compounds to locate food, predators, or toxins. The sense of smell is also involved in animal communication, and revealing the underlying mechanisms will therefore facilitate a deeper understanding of animal behaviour. Since the 1940s different theories have speculated on the fundamental basis of olfaction. It was assumed that odorant molecules were recognized by selective protein receptors in the nose, triggering a nervous signal processed by the brain. The discovery of these receptors in the early 1990s allowed great progress in understanding the physiological and biochemical principles of olfaction. An overview of the different mechanisms involved in the coding of odour character as well as odour intensity is presented here, focusing on the biochemical basis of odorant recognition. Despite the enormous progress achieved in recent years, details of odorant-receptor interaction at the molecular level and the mechanisms of olfactory receptor activation are poorly understood. The likely role of metal ions in odorant recognition is discussed, and also the perireceptor events involved in odorant transport and biotransformation, with a view to providing a comprehensive overview of mammalian olfaction to guide future computational structural models and the design of functional experiments. Recent studies have analysed the olfactory genome of several species, providing information about the evolution of olfaction. The role of the olfactory system in animal communication is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Zarzo
- Department of Applied Statistics, Technical University of Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmiedeberg K, Shirokova E, Weber HP, Schilling B, Meyerhof W, Krautwurst D. Structural determinants of odorant recognition by the human olfactory receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. J Struct Biol 2007; 159:400-12. [PMID: 17601748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2007] [Revised: 04/20/2007] [Accepted: 04/23/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
An interaction of odorants with olfactory receptors is thought to be the initial step in odorant detection. However, ligands have been reported for only 6 out of 380 human olfactory receptors, with their structural determinants of odorant recognition just beginning to emerge. Guided by the notion that amino acid positions that interact with specific odorants would be conserved in orthologs, but variable in paralogs, and based on the prediction of a set of 22 of such amino acid positions, we have combined site-directed mutagenesis, rhodopsin-based homology modelling, and functional expression in HeLa/Olf cells of receptors OR1A1 and OR1A2. We found that (i) their odorant profiles are centred around citronellic terpenoid structures, (ii) two evolutionary conserved amino acid residues in transmembrane domain 3 are necessary for the responsiveness of OR1A1 and the mouse ortholog Olfr43 to (S)-(-)-citronellol, (iii) changes at these two positions are sufficient to account for the differential (S)-(-)-citronellol responsiveness of the paralogs OR1A1 and OR1A2, and (iv) the interaction sites for (S)-(-)-citronellal and (S)-(-)-citronellol differ in both human receptors. Our results show that the orientation of odorants within a homology modelling-derived binding pocket of olfactory receptor orthologs is defined by evolutionary conserved amino acid positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Schmiedeberg
- German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Department of Molecular Genetics, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khafizov K, Anselmi C, Menini A, Carloni P. Ligand specificity of odorant receptors. J Mol Model 2006; 13:401-9. [PMID: 17120078 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-006-0160-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2006] [Accepted: 09/12/2006] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Odorant receptors belong to class A of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and detect a large number of structurally diverse odorant molecules. A recent structural bioinformatic analysis suggests that structural features are conserved across class A of GPCRs in spite of their low sequence identity. Based on this work, we have aligned the sequences of 29 ORs for which ligand binding data are available. Recent site-directed mutagenesis experiments on one such receptor (MOR174-9) provide information that helped to identify nine amino-acid residues involved in ligand binding. Our modeling provides a rationale for amino acids in equivalent positions in most of the odorant receptors considered and helps to identify other amino acids that could be important for ligand binding. Our findings are consistent with most of the previous models and allow predictions for site-directed mutagenesis experiments, which could also validate our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Khafizov
- International School for Advanced Studies, via Beirut 4, I-34014, Trieste, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elsaesser R, Paysan J. Morituri te salutant? Olfactory signal transduction and the role of phosphoinositides. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 34:97-116. [PMID: 16374712 DOI: 10.1007/s11068-005-5050-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2005] [Revised: 08/11/2005] [Accepted: 08/11/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
During the past 150 years, researchers have investigated the cellular, physiological, and molecular mechanisms underlying the sense of smell. Based on these efforts, a conclusive model of olfactory signal transduction in the vertebrate's nose is now available, spanning from G-protein-mediated odorant receptors to ion channels, which are linked by a cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-mediated signal transduction cascade. Here we review some historical milestones in the chronology of olfactory research, particularly emphasising the role of cyclic nucleotides and inositol trisphosphate as alternative second messengers in olfactory cells. We will describe the functional anatomy of the nose, outline the cellular composition of the olfactory epithelium, and describe the discovery of the molecular backbone of the olfactory signal transduction cascade. We then summarize our current model, in which cyclic adenosine monophosphate is the sole excitatory second messenger in olfactory sensory neurons. Finally, a possible significance of microvillous olfactory epithelial cells and inositol trisphosphate in olfaction will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Elsaesser
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 725 N. Wolfe St., 408 WBSB, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Frauli M, Neuville P, Vol C, Pin JP, Prézeau L. Among the twenty classical L-amino acids, only glutamate directly activates metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropharmacology 2005; 50:245-53. [PMID: 16310227 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2005] [Revised: 09/09/2005] [Accepted: 09/26/2005] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Under pathophysiological conditions, cellular amino acids can be profusely released from cells into the cerebral interstitial space. Because several class-C G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) display a broad natural ligand spectrum, being sensitive to more than one endogenous ligand, we wondered whether the related metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors could be modulated by various types of L-amino acids, allowing them to sense large increase in extracellular amino acid concentration. Here, the agonist, antagonist and allosteric effects of the twenty classical L-amino acids were evaluated on the eight mGlu receptor subtypes. We show that, in addition to glutamate (Glu), cysteine, aspartate and asparagine also lead to the activation of mGlu3, 4 and 5. Interestingly, our data demonstrate that the effect of these three amino acids did not result from a direct activation of the receptors, but from an indirect action involving Glu-transporters/exchangers. These data first demonstrate that mGlu receptors, unlike other class-C GPCRs, display an extremely high selectivity towards one ligand. Moreover, our results also show that Glu transport systems allow mGlu receptors to sense large increase in the extracellular concentration of some amino acids. Such a system will certainly lead to a large increase in some mGlu receptor activity under pathological conditions, such as seizure, ischemia or other brain injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mélanie Frauli
- Faust Pharmaceuticals SA, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, F-67400, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Man O, Gilad Y, Lancet D. Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human-mouse comparisons. Protein Sci 2004; 13:240-54. [PMID: 14691239 PMCID: PMC2286516 DOI: 10.1110/ps.03296404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Olfactory receptors (ORs) are a large family of proteins involved in the recognition and discrimination of numerous odorants. These receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) hyperfamily, for which little structural data are available. In this study we predict the binding site residues of OR proteins by analyzing a set of 1441 OR protein sequences from mouse and human. The central insight utilized is that functional contact residues would be conserved among pairs of orthologous receptors, but considerably less conserved among paralogous pairs. Using judiciously selected subsets of 218 ortholog pairs and 518 paralog pairs, we have identified 22 sequence positions that are both highly conserved among the putative orthologs and variable among paralogs. These residues are disposed on transmembrane helices 2 to 7, and on the second extracellular loop of the receptor. Strikingly, although the prediction makes no assumption about the location of the binding site, these amino acid positions are clustered around a pocket in a structural homology model of ORs, mostly facing the inner lumen. We propose that the identified positions constitute the odorant binding site. This conclusion is supported by the observation that all but one of the predicted binding site residues correspond to ligand-contact positions in other rhodopsin-like GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orna Man
- Department of Molecular Genetics and the Crown Human Genome Center, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Humans have a limited capacity to analyze odor mixtures with three to four being the maximum [Physiol Behav 46 (1989) 809.]. This study investigates the large loss of information about odor identity that occurs in mixtures and aims to determine the information on which identification and failure to identify is based. In Experiment 1, 14 subjects used a selective attention procedure to identify odorants in stimuli consisting of one to four components. As expected, substantial difficulties were encountered in identifying more than two odorants, and chance level scores were obtained for the group for each of the odorants in the quaternary mixture. In Experiment 2, 21 subjects used a profiling procedure consisting of 146 descriptors to describe the odor qualities perceived in the same stimuli used in Experiment 1. The results indicated that for some odorants, loss of a major characteristic quality occurred even in binary mixtures, but that many of the features of some odorants remained in the quaternary mixture. Comparison of the data from the two experiments indicated that identification of most of the prominent qualities of an odorant was not necessarily sufficient for identification of the odorant in a mixture. In contrast, the loss of some prominent features did not always result in non-identification. A configurational hypothesis of olfaction, analogous to that for facial and object recognition, is proposed to account for the data and the processes underlying odor identification in mixtures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Jinks
- Centre for Advanced Food Research, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury, Bourke Street, Richmond, New South Wales 2753, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Specificity and sensitivity of a human olfactory receptor functionally expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and Xenopus Laevis oocytes. J Neurosci 1999. [PMID: 10460249 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.19-17-07426.1999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we provide the first evidence for functional expression of a human olfactory receptor protein (OR17-40) and show that recombinant olfactory receptors can be functionally expressed in heterologous systems. A mixture of 100 different odorants (Henkel 100) elicited a transient increase in intracellular [Ca(2+)] in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells stably or transiently transfected with the plasmid pOR17-40. By subdividing the odorant mixture into progressively smaller groups, we identified a single component that represented the only effective substance: helional. Only the structurally closely related molecule heliotroplyacetone also activated the receptor. Other compounds, including piperonal, safrole, and vanillin, were completely ineffective. Mock-transfected cells and cells transfected with other receptors showed no change in intracellular [Ca(2+)] in response to odor stimulation. We were also able to functionally express OR17-40 in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Coexpression of a "reporter" channel allowed measurement of the response of oocytes injected with the cRNA of the human receptor to the odor mixture Henkel 100. The effective substances were the same (helional, heliotropylacetone) as those identified by functionally expressing the receptor in HEK293 cells and were active at the same, lower micromolar concentration. These findings open the possibility of now characterizing the sensitivity and specificity of many, if not all, of the hundreds of different human olfactory receptors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The accumulation of hundreds of olfactory receptor (OR) sequences, along with the recent availability of detailed models of other G-protein-coupled receptors, allows us to analyze the OR amino acid variability patterns in a structural context. A Fourier analysis of 197 multiply aligned olfactory receptor sequences showed an alpha-helical periodicity in the variability profile. This was particularly pronounced in the more variable transmembranal segments 3, 4, and 5. Rhodopsin-based homology modeling demonstrated that the inferred variable helical faces largely point to the interior of the receptor barrel. We propose that a set of 17 hypervariable residues, which point to the barrel interior and are more extracellularly disposed, constitute the odorant complementarity determining regions. While 12 of these residues coincide with established ligand-binding contact positions in other G-protein-coupled receptors, the rest are suggested to form an olfactory-unique aspect of the binding pocket. Highly conserved olfactory receptor-specific sequence motifs, found in the second and third intracellular loops, may comprise the G-protein recognition epitope. The prediction of olfactory receptor functional sites provides concrete suggestions of site-directed mutagenesis experiments for altering ligand and G-protein specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Pilpel
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Crown Human Genome Center, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|