Optimal Response to Cardiac Arrest study: defibrillation waveform effects

2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Advanced Life Support. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence and devise clinical recommendations on advanced life support (ALS) in dogs and cats and to identify critical knowledge gaps.

DESIGN

Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to ALS following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by ALS Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.

SETTING

Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.

RESULTS

Seventeen questions pertaining to vascular access, vasopressors in shockable and nonshockable rhythms, anticholinergics, defibrillation, antiarrhythmics, and adjunct drug therapy as well as open-chest CPR were reviewed. Of the 33 treatment recommendations formulated, 6 recommendations addressed the management of patients with nonshockable arrest rhythms, 10 addressed shockable rhythms, and 6 provided guidance on open-chest CPR. We recommend against high-dose epinephrine even after prolonged CPR and suggest that atropine, when indicated, is used only once. In animals with a shockable rhythm in which initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, we recommend doubling the defibrillator dose once and suggest vasopressin (or epinephrine if vasopressin is not available), esmolol, lidocaine in dogs, and/or amiodarone in cats.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated RECOVER ALS guidelines clarify the approach to refractory shockable rhythms and prolonged CPR. Very low quality of evidence due to absence of clinical data in dogs and cats continues to compromise the certainty with which recommendations can be made.

Amplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation success at low energy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

The optimal energy for defibrillation has not yet been identified and very often the maximum energy is delivered. We sought to assess whether amplitude spectral area (AMSA) of ventricular fibrillation (VF) could predict low energy level defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. This is a multicentre international study based on retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We included all OHCAs with at least one manual defibrillation. AMSA values were calculated by analyzing the data collected by the monitors/defibrillators used in the field (Corpuls 3 and Lifepak 12/15) and using a 2-s-pre-shock electrocardiogram interval. We run two different analyses dividing the shocks into three tertiles (T1, T2, T3) based on AMSA values. 629 OHCAs were included and 2095 shocks delivered (energy ranging from 100 to 360 J; median 200 J). Both in the "extremes analysis" and in the "by site analysis", the AMSA values of the effective shocks at low energy were significantly higher than those at high energy (p = 0.01). The likelihood of shock success increased significantly from the lowest to the highest tertile. After correction for age, call to shock time, use of mechanical CPR, presence of bystander CPR, sex and energy level, high AMSA value was directly associated with the probability of shock success [T2 vs T1 OR 3.8 (95% CI 2.5-6) p < 0.001; T3 vs T1 OR 12.7 (95% CI 8.2-19.2), p < 0.001]. AMSA values are associated with the probability of low-energy shock success so that they could guide energy optimization in shockable cardiac arrest patients.

A national survey of clubs medical provision and facilities in BUCS American Football 2019-2020

BACKGROUND

British American Football (BAF) is a developing sport in the UK, with keen growth in the British Universities and Colleges Sport (BUCS) league. Participation in BAF carries risks and so to facilitate safe participation medical care services must be evaluated.

AIMS

To evaluate medical provision in BUCS American Football in the 2019-2020 season.

METHODS

An online survey tool was used to collect data from BUCS BAF teams in the 2019-2020 season. Thirty-one teams (from across England, Wales and Scotland) responded to questions on facilities, provision and procedures.

RESULTS

Almost 42% of teams had a regular team first aider who attended home games each week. Only 61.5% attended away games and 7.7% attended team training. Access to a first aider was not dependent upon division. Home games were more likely to be risk assessed and have an emergency action plan compared to away games. The majority of teams had access to automated external defibrillator (AED) within 100 m of the pitch, yet only 29% of staff were trained to use them. Almost 84% of teams reported carrying a designated fully charged phone (with signal). Prominent qualitative themes indicated were cost/funding as barriers to hiring qualified medical staff, lack of institutional support, unreliability of medical provision and inadequate facilities/preparation for games.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide key information on the status of medical provision, facilities and protocols in BUCS BAF. Data reveals a lack of consistent medical personnel, particularly at training and away games, and training in emergency care.

[Adult advanced life support]

These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support

These European Resuscitation Council Advanced Life Support guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the prevention of and ALS treatments for both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Using Nanosecond Shocks for Cardiac Defibrillation

The purpose of this review article is to summarize our current understanding of the efficacy and safety of cardiac defibrillation with nanosecond shocks. Experiments in isolated hearts, using optical mapping of the electrical activity, have demonstrated that nanosecond shocks can defibrillate with lower energies than conventional millisecond shocks. Single defibrillation strength nanosecond shocks do not cause obvious damage, but repeated stimulation leads to deterioration of the hearts. In isolated myocytes, nanosecond pulses can also stimulate at lower energies than at longer pulses and cause less electroporation (propidium uptake). The mechanism is likely electroporation of the plasma membrane. Repeated stimulation leads to distorted calcium gradients.

Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks

Intense electric shocks of nanosecond (ns) duration can become a new modality for more efficient but safer defibrillation. We extended strength-duration curves for excitation of cardiomyocytes down to 200 ns, and compared electroporative damage by proportionally more intense shocks of different duration. Enzymatically isolated murine, rabbit, and swine adult ventricular cardiomyocytes (VCM) were loaded with a Ca²⁺ indicator Fluo-4 or Fluo-5N and subjected to shocks of increasing amplitude until a Ca²⁺ transient was optically detected. Then, the voltage was increased 5-fold, and the electric cell injury was quantified by the uptake of a membrane permeability marker dye, propidium iodide. We established that: (1) Stimuli down to 200-ns duration can elicit Ca²⁺ transients, although repeated ns shocks often evoke abnormal responses, (2) Stimulation thresholds expectedly increase as the shock duration decreases, similarly for VCMs from different species, (3) Stimulation threshold energy is minimal for the shortest shocks, (4) VCM orientation with respect to the electric field does not affect the threshold for ns shocks, and (5) The shortest shocks cause the least electroporation injury. These findings support further exploration of ns defibrillation, although abnormal response patterns to repetitive ns stimuli are of a concern and require mechanistic analysis.

Return of spontaneous circulation and long-term survival according to feedback provided by automated external defibrillators

Background

We aimed to investigate the effect of automated external defibrillator (AED) feedback mechanisms on survival in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims. In addition, we investigated converting rates in patients with shockable rhythms according to AED shock waveforms and energy levels.

Methods

We collected data on OHCA occurring between 2011 and 2014 in the Capital Region of Denmark where an AED was applied prior to ambulance arrival. Patient data were obtained from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and medical records. AED data were retrieved from the Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC) and information on feedback mechanisms, energy waveform and energy level was downloaded from the applied AEDs.

Results

A total of 196 OHCAs had an AED applied prior to ambulance arrival; 62 of these (32%) provided audio visual (AV) feedback while no feedback was provided in 134 (68%). We found no difference in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital arrival according to AV‐feedback; 34 (55%, 95% confidence interval (CI) [13–67]) vs. 72 (54%, 95% CI [45–62]), P = 1 (odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% CI [0.6–1.9]) or 30‐day survival; 24 (39%, 95% CI [28–51]) vs. 53 (40%, 95% CI [32–49]), P = 0.88 (OR 1.1 (95% CI [0.6–2.0])). Moreover, we found no difference in converting rates among patients with initial shockable rhythm receiving one or more shocks according to AED energy waveform and energy level.

Conclusions

No difference in survival after OHCA according to AED feedback mechanisms, nor any difference in converting rates according to AED waveform or energy levels was detected.

Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic defibrillation is a potentially life-saving treatment for people with ventricular fibrillation (VF) and haemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT). In recent years, biphasic waveforms have become more commonly used for defibrillation than monophasic waveforms. Clinical trials of internal defibrillation and transthoracic defibrillation of short-duration arrhythmias of up to 30 seconds have demonstrated the superiority of biphasic waveforms over monophasic waveforms. However, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) involves a duration of VF/VT of several minutes before defibrillation is attempted.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of biphasic defibrillation waveforms, compared to monophasic, for resuscitation of people experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases for potentially relevant studies up to 10 September 2014: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE. Also we checked the bibliographies of relevant studies and review articles, contacted authors of published reviews and reviewed webpages (including those of device manufacturers) relevant to the review topic. We handsearched the abstracts of conference proceedings for the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, European Society of Cardiology, European Resuscitation Council, Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Regarding language restrictions, we did not apply any.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation in adults with OHCA. Two review authors independently screened the literature search results.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data from the included trials and performed 'Risk of bias' assessments. We resolved any disagreements by discussion and consensus. The primary outcome was the risk of failure to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes included risk of failure to revert VF to an organised rhythm following the first shock or up to three shocks, survival to hospital admission and survival to discharge.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials (552 participants) that compared biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation in people with OHCA. Based on the assessment of five quality domains, we identified two trials that were at high risk of bias, one trial at unclear risk of bias and one trial at low risk of bias. The risk ratio (RR) for failure to achieve ROSC after biphasic compared to monophasic waveform defibrillation was 0.86 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.20; four trials, 552 participants). The RR for failure to defibrillate on the first shock following biphasic defibrillation compared to monophasic was 0.84 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.01; three trials, 450 participants); and 0.81 (95% CI 0.61 to 1.09; two trials, 317 participants) for one to three stacked shocks. The RR for failure to achieve ROSC after the first shock was 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.04; two trials, 285 participants). Biphasic waveforms did not reduce the risk of death before hospital admission (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.23; three trials, 383 participants) or before hospital discharge (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.42; four trials, 550 participants). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity in any of the pooled analyses. None of the included trials reported adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is uncertain whether biphasic defibrillators have an important effect on defibrillation success in people with OHCA. Further large studies are needed to provide adequate statistical power.

Advantage of four-electrode over two-electrode defibrillators

Defibrillation is the standard clinical treatment used to stop ventricular fibrillation. An electrical device delivers a controlled amount of electrical energy via a pair of electrodes in order to reestablish a normal heart rate. We propose a technique that is a combination of biphasic shocks applied with a four-electrode system rather than the standard two-electrode system. We use a numerical model of a one-dimensional ring of cardiac tissue in order to test and evaluate the benefit of this technique. We compare three different shock protocols, namely a monophasic and two types of biphasic shocks. The results obtained by using a four-electrode system are compared quantitatively with those obtained with the standard two-electrode system. We find that a huge reduction in defibrillation threshold is achieved with the four-electrode system. For the most efficient protocol (asymmetric biphasic), we obtain a reduction in excess of 80% in the energy required for a defibrillation success rate of 90%. The mechanisms of successful defibrillation are also analyzed. This reveals that the advantage of asymmetric biphasic shocks with four electrodes lies in the duration of the cathodal and anodal phase of the shock.

Perishock Pause Intervals and Rearrest after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

The loss of pulses after successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is known as rearrest (RA). The causes of RA are not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between shock pause intervals and RA.

METHODS

Data from treated OHCA with ROSC and one or more defibrillation attempts were obtained from one site of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. All analyses were conducted internally. Data available for analysis included cases spanning 2006-2008 and 2010-2011. Defibrillator tracings were used to calculate both components of the perishock pause (PSP) interval: the pre- (preSP) and the postshock pauses (postSP). RA and no-RA shock pauses were compared and independent associations between shock pause intervals, patient characteristics, and RA were assessed with the appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Analysis included 241 shocks from 101 cases. Forty-one cases (41%) had RA. RA vs. no-RA median (interquartile range) shock pauses in seconds were: preSP 13.5 (6.0-18.0) vs. 15.0 (10.9-21.5) (p = 0.121); postSP 6.0 (3.5-8.2) vs. 8.7 (4.5-13.9) (p = 0.053); and PSP 18.0 (12.3-24.0) vs. 24.0 (16.7-30.2) (p = 0.022). Considering all possible shock pause durations, shock pause lengths and various patient characteristics were not associated with RA. If 30 s or shorter, the preSP (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 955 confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.98) and postSP (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-0.99) were related to RA.

CONCLUSION

Shock pause length was inversely associated with RA when shock pause intervals were limited to 30 s or less. Shock pauses and RA were not associated when all durations of shock pauses were considered.

Incidence and outcomes of rearrest following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

INTRODUCTION

Rearrest occurs when a patient experiences cardiac arrest after successful resuscitation. The incidence and outcomes of rearrest following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have been estimated in limited local studies. We sought provide a large-scale estimate of rearrest incidence and its effect on survival.

METHODS

We obtained case data from emergency medical services-treated, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a multi-site clinical research network with clinical centers in 11 regions in the US and Canada. The cohort comprised all cases captured between 2006 and 2008 at 10 of 11 regions with prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. We used three methods to ascertain rearrest via direct signal analysis, indirect signal analysis, and emergency department arrival vital status. Rearrest incidence was estimated as the proportion of cases with return of spontaneous circulation that experience rearrest. Regional rearrest incidence estimates were compared with the χ(2)-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between rearrest and survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Out of 18,937 emergency medical services-assessed cases captured between 2006 and 2008, 11,456 (60.5%) cases were treated by emergency medical services and 4396 (38.4%) had prehospital return of spontaneous circulation. Of these, rearrest ascertainment data was available in 3253 cases, with 568 (17.5%) experiencing rearrest. Rearrest differed by region (10.2% to 21.2%, p < 0.001). Rearrest was inversely associated with survival (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.14-0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Rearrest was found to occur frequently after resuscitation and was inversely related to survival.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a common health problem associated with high levels of mortality. Cardiac arrest is caused by three groups of dysrhythmias: ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), pulseless electric activity (PEA) and asystole. The most common dysrhythmia found in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is VF. During VF or VT, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provides perfusion and oxygenation to the tissues, whilst defibrillation restores a viable cardiac rhythm. Early successful defibrillation is known to improve outcomes in VF/VT. However, it has been hypothesized that a period of CPR before defibrillation creates a more conducive physiological environment, increasing the likelihood of successful defibrillation. The order of priority of CPR versus defibrillation therefore remains in contention. As previous studies have remained inconclusive, we conducted a systematic review of available evidence in an attempt to draw conclusions on whether CPR plus delayed defibrillation or immediate defibrillation resulted in better outcomes in OHCA.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether an initial one and one-half to three minutes of CPR administered by paramedics before defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation on arrival influenced survival rates, neurological outcomes or rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in OHCA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 6); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1948 to May 2013); EMBASE (1980 to May 2013); the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science (1980 to May 2013) and the China Academic Journal Network Publishing Database (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), 1980 to May 2013). We included studies published in all languages. We also searched the Current Controlled Trials and Clinical Trials databases for ongoing trials. We screened the references lists of studies included in our review against the reference lists of relevant International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) evidence worksheets.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Our participant group consisted of adults over 18 years of age presenting with OHCA who were in VF or pulseless VT at the time of emergency medical service (EMS) paramedic arrival. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of one and one-half to three minutes of CPR versus defibrillation as initial therapy on survival and neurological outcomes of these participants. We excluded observational and cross-over design studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data. We contacted study authors to ask for additional data when required. The risk ratio (RR) for each outcome was calculated and summarized in the meta-analysis after heterogeneity was considered. We used Review Manager software for all analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four RCTs with a total of 3090 enrolled participants (one study used a cluster-randomized design). Three trials were considered to have a relatively low risk of bias, and one trial was considered to have a relatively high risk. When survival to hospital discharge was compared, 38 of 320 (11.88%) participants survived to discharge in the initial CPR plus delayed defibrillation group compared with 39 of 338 participants (11.54%) in the immediate defibrillation group (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.20, Chi(2) = 10.78, degrees of freedom (df) = 5, P value 0.06, I(2) = 54%, low-quality evidence).When we compared the neurological outcome at hospital discharge (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.93, low-quality evidence), the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.15,low-quality evidence) and survival at one year (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.49, low-quality evidence), we could not rule out the superiority of either treatment.Adverse effects were not associated with either treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the low quality of available evidence, we have been unable to determine conclusively whether immediate defibrillation and one and one-half to three minutes of CPR as initial therapy before defibrillation have similar effects on rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival to discharge or neurological insult.We have also been unable to conclude whether either treatment approach provides a degree of superiority in OHCA.We propose that this is an area that needs further rigorous research through additional high-quality RCTs, including larger sample sizes and proper subgroup analysis.

Year in review 2012: Critical Care--Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and trauma

In 2012 Critical Care published many articles pertaining to the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and trauma. In this review, we summarize several of these articles, including those regarding advances in resuscitation techniques and methods. We examine articles pertaining to prehospital endotracheal intubation, the use of specialized devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and policies regarding transport destinations for both cardiac arrest and trauma patients. Articles on the predictors of outcome in both pediatric and adult populations are evaluated, including articles on the effects of obesity on survival from hemorrhage and pediatric outcomes from traumatic cardiac arrest. The effects of the type and volume of resuscitation fluids for both adult and pediatric patients are discussed, as are the factors contributing to hypothermia in trauma patients.

Biphasic versus monophasic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Biphasic defibrillation is more effective than monophasic one in controlled in-hospital conditions. The present review evaluated the performance of both waveforms in the defibrillation of patients of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with initial ventricular fibrillation (Vf) rhythm under the context of current recommendations for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

METHODS

From inception to June 2012, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched systemically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies that compared the effects of biphasic and monophasic shocks on Vf termination, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to hospital discharge in OHCA patients with initial Vf rhythm. No restrictions were applied regarding language, population, or publication year.

RESULTS

Four RCTs including 572 patients were identified from 131 potentially relevant references for meta-analysis. The synthesis of these RCTs yielded fixed-effect pooled risk ratios (RRs) for biphasic and monophasic waveforms on Vf termination survival to hospital discharge (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, [0.84-1.54]).

CONCLUSION

Biphasic waveforms did not seem superior to monophasic ones with respect to Vf termination, ROSC, or survival to hospital discharge in OHCA patients with initial Vf rhythm under the context of current guidelines. However, most trials were conducted in accordance with previous guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Therefore, further trials are needed to clarify this issue.

Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation and stabilization

Cardiopulmonary arrest refers to cessation of clinically detectable cardiac activity. In children, it usually results from progression of shock, respiratory failure or cardiac dysrhythmia. Early recognition and timely interventions in above group of patients is the key to prevent progression to cardiac arrest. The goal of resuscitation is to urgently re-establish oxygenation of vital organs by attention to Airway, Breathing and Circulation. Measures to restore airway patency include positioning, suctioning, continuous positive airway pressure, relieving a foreign-body airway obstruction and, endotracheal intubation, tracheotomy or laryngeal mask airway. Breathing is supported with O(2) and if needed, bag-mask ventilation, or endotracheal intubation and ventilation. Patients with absent or feeble central pulse are given cardiac compressions (CPR) at a rate of 100/ min synchronized with ventilation. In sudden witnessed collapse, immediate defibrillation is warranted, followed by CPR and administration of drugs. In unwitnessed collapse, CPR is performed for five cycles or 2 min before defibrillation. In patients with shock, a venous or an intraosseous access is rapidly established to administer 20 ml/kg saline bolus. Supraventricular tachycardia is treated with vagal maneuvers and adenosine, if the patient is stable and with synchronized cardioversion, if unstable. Ventricular tachycardia is treated with amiodarone or lidocaine, if stable, and cardioversion if unstable or if drugs fail. Ventricular fibrillation needs defibrillation. Aggressive supportive care is needed during the post-resuscitation phase. There is no definite marker to determine futility of CPR. Short duration of arrest, early initiation of CPR, hypothermia as the cause of arrest, and in-hospital arrest have better prognosis.

Defibrillation in children

Defibrillation is the only effective treatment for ventricular fibrillation (VF). Optimal methods for defibrillation in children are derived and extrapolated from adult data. VF occurs as the initial rhythm in 8-20% of pediatric cardiac arrests. This has fostered a new interest in determining the optimal technique for pediatric defibrillation. This review will provide a brief background of the history of defibrillation and a review of the current literature on pediatric defibrillation. The literature search was performed through PubMed, using the MeSH headings of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation and electric countershock. The authors’ personal bibliographic files were also searched. Only published articles were chosen. The recommended energy dose has been 2 J/kg for 30 years, but recent reports may indicate that higher dosages may be more effective and safe. In 2005, the European Resuscitation Council recommended 4 J/kg as the initial dose, without escalation for subsequent shocks. Automated external defibrillators are increasingly used for pediatric cardiac arrest, and available reports indicate high success rates. Additional research on pediatric defibrillation is critical in order to be able to provide an equivalent standard of care for children in cardiac arrest and improve outcomes.

Incidence of rearrest after return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) occurs in 35.0 to 61.0% of emergency medical services (EMS)-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs); however, not all patients achieving ROSC survive to hospital arrival or discharge. Previous studies have estimated the incidence of some types of rearrest(RA) at 61.0 to 79.0%, and the electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform characteristics of prehospital RA rhythms have not been previously described.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the incidence of RA in OHCA, to classify RA events by type, and to measure the time from ROSC to RA. We also conducted a preliminary analysis of the relationship between first EMS-detected rhythms and RA, as well as the effect of RA on survival.

METHODS

The Pittsburgh Regional Clinical Center of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) -sponsored Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) provided cases from a population-based cardiac arrest surveillance program, ROC Epistry. Only OHCA cases of nontraumatic etiology with available and adequate ECG files were included. We analyzed defibrillator-monitor ECG tracings (Philips MRX), patient care reports (PCRs), and defibrillator audio recordings from EMS-treated cases of OHCA spanning the period from October 2006 to December 2008. We identified ROSC and RA through interpretation of ECG tracings and audio recordings. Rearrest events were categorized as ventricular fibrillation (VF), pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), asystole, and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) based on ECG waveform characteristics. Proportions of RA rhythms were stratified by first EMS rhythm and compared using Pearson's chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to test the predictive relationship between RA and survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 329 of 1,199 patients (27.4% [95.0% confidence interval (CI): 25.0-30.0%]) treated for cardiac arrest. Of these, 113 had ECG tracings that were available and adequate for analysis. Rearrest occurred in 41 patients (36.0% [95.0% CI: 26.0-46.0%]), with a total of 69 RA events. Survival to hospital discharge in RA cases was 23.1% (95.0% CI: 11.1-39.3%), compared with 27.8% (95.0% CI: 17.9-39.6%) in cases without RA. Counts of RA events by type were as follows: 17 VF (24.6% [95% CI: 15.2-36.5%]), 20 pulseless VT (29.0% [95.0% CI: 18.7-41.2%]), 26 PEA (37.0% [95.0% CI: 26.3-50.2%]), and six asystole (8.8% [95.0% CI: 3.3-18.0%]). Rearrest was not predictive of survival to hospital discharge; however, initial EMS rhythm was predictive of RA shockability. The overall median (interquartile range) time from ROSC to RA among all events was 3.1 (1.6-6.3) minutes.

CONCLUSION

In this sample, the incidence of RA was 38.0%. The most common type of RA was PEA. Shockability of first EMS rhythm was found to predict subsequent RA rhythm shockability.

Tachyarrhythmias and defibrillation

Although cardiac arrhythmias less commonly cause hemodynamic compromise in children than in adults, prompt recognition and treatment of arrhythmias remain an important part of pediatric resuscitation because of the availability of specific, effective therapies. This article summarizes the 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Pediatric Advanced Life Support regarding tachyarrhythmias, including treatment with antiarrhythmics and direct current countershock therapy, and provides an update of recent literature since the guidelines were published.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and pediatric advanced life support update for the emergency physician

Although pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest is uncommon, out-of-hospital survival is dismal. Through international consensus conferences, the American Heart Association develops new treatment recommendations for cardiopulmonary resuscitation every few years. The recent changes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and pediatric advanced life support, with some background information about these changes, will be reviewed.

Rescue shock outcomes during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

Questions remain about the optimal timing and method for treating ventricular fibrillation (VF) during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and a variety of treatment protocols are used. Detailed description of rescue shock outcomes during actual patient care under different protocols would allow rational comparison of treatment strategies. The purpose of this study is to describe rescue shock outcomes in a single system using a specific defibrillation protocol.

METHODS

Patient care records were examined for all adult (age> or =18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases treated by an urban paramedic system during a 52-month interval. The immediate outcomes of monophasic rescue shocks were determined from the record and were classified as asystole, VF, restoration of organized electrical activity (ROEA), or restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

RESULTS

Among 1496 cases of cardiac arrest, 654 received a median of 3 (IQR 1,5) rescue shocks. Of these cases, 408 (28%) had an initial rhythm of VF whereas VF developed later during resuscitation in the remainder. For an initial series of three escalating rescue shocks, most cases of ROSC (9%) and ROEA (12%) occurred after the first shock. The likelihood that a rescue shock would result in ROSC or ROEA increased with witnessed collapse, and rescue shock number. An initial rhythm of asystole was associated with a decreased likelihood that a rescue shock would result in ROEA.

CONCLUSIONS

Witnessed collapse and an initial rhythm other than asystole were associated with an increased likelihood of rescue shock success. There is a small but real incremental gain in ROSC and ROEA from delivering three rescue shocks in rapid succession. The greater incidence of rescue shock success with later rescue shocks suggests that VF responds favorably to ongoing resuscitation.

Porcine defibrillation thresholds with chopped biphasic truncated exponential waveforms

PURPOSE

Conventional biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveforms have been studied extensively but less is known about "chopping modulated" BTE shocks. Previous studies comparing chopped and unchopped waveforms have found conflicting results. This study compared the defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) of a variety of chopped and unchopped BTE waveforms.

METHODS

Six anesthetized pigs were defibrillated after 15s of electrically induced ventricular fibrillation (VF). Three waveform types were studied: unchopped BTE, "short" duration chopped, and "long" duration chopped waveforms. Each type included waveforms generated with 50, 100, and 200 microF capacitances, giving 9 total waveforms. Shocks were delivered in a standard up-down protocol and the order of the waveforms was randomized. Defibrillation thresholds were calculated using a Bayesian logistic regression model.

RESULTS

DFTs of the 50, 100, and 200 microF unchopped waveforms were 122+/-22, 124+/-22, and 126+/-22 J. Short chopped DFTs were at least 75+/-23 J higher than unchopped DFTs. Long chopped DFTs averaged 66+/-20 J more than short chopped DFTs. There is a 99.5% probability that the best of the chopped waveforms has a higher DFT than the worst of the unchopped waveforms, and a 95% probability that the difference is at least 37 J. DFT differences between capacitor values were less than 7 J for all waveform types.

CONCLUSIONS

When treating swine with short-duration VF, chopped waveforms require more energy to defibrillate than unchopped waveforms. More study is required to assess the performance of chopped waveforms when treating cardiac arrest patients.

Resuscitation outcomes comparing year 2000 with year 2005 ALS guidelines in a pig model of cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Ventricular fibrillation remains the leading cause of death in western societies. International organizations publish guidelines to follow in case of cardiac arrest. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the newly published guidelines record similar resuscitation success with the 2000 Advanced Life Support Guidelines on Resuscitation in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nineteen landrace/large white pigs were used. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with the use of a transvenous pacing wire inserted into the right ventricle. The animals were randomized into two groups. In Group A, 10 animals were resuscitated using the 2000 guidelines, whereas in Group B, 9 animals were resuscitated using the 2005 guidelines. Both algorithms recorded similar successful resuscitation rates, as 60% of the animals in Group A and 44.5% in Group B were successfully resuscitated. However, animals in Group A restored a rhythm, compatible with a pulse, quicker than those in Group B (p=0.002). Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) was not adversely affected by three defibrillation attempts in Group A.

CONCLUSIONS

Both algorithms' resulted in comparable resuscitation success, however, guidelines 2000 resulted in faster resuscitation times. These preliminary results merit further investigation.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation algorithms, defibrillation and optimized ventilation during resuscitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2005, the American Heart Association released its Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. This article reviews the treatment algorithms for Advanced Cardiac Life Support, citing the evidence on which the Guidelines are based. Additional focus is placed on defibrillation and optimized ventilation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Major changes include a reorganization of the algorithms for cardiac arrest. Emphasis on effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation is placed as the key to improved survival. Single defibrillation shocks are recommended (compared with three 'stacked' shocks) with immediate provision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and minimal interruptions in chest compressions. The recommended chest compression : ventilation rate for single rescuers has been changed to 30:2.

SUMMARY

Despite advances in resuscitation science, basic life support remains the key to improving survival outcomes. Ultimately, as new knowledge is gained, we believe resuscitation therapies will be more individualized, on the basis of pathophysiology and etiology of the initial cardiac arrest.

Demystifying biphasic defibrillation

This technology is making defibrillators less likely to injure patients. Here's what you need to know.

The Department of Health National Defibrillator Programme: analysis of downloads from 250 deployments of public access defibrillators

From April 2000 to November 2002, the Department of Health (England) placed 681 automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in 110 public places for use by volunteer lay first responders. An audit has been undertaken of the first 250 deployments, of which 182 were for confirmed cardiac arrest. Of these, 177 were witnessed whilst 5 occurred in situations that were remote or initially inaccessible to the responders. The response interval between collapse and the initiation of CPR or AED placement was estimated to be 3-5 min in most cases. Ventricular fibrillation or rapid ventricular tachycardia (one case) was the first recorded rhythm in 146 cases (82%). In all, 44 of the 177 witnessed cases are known to have survived to hospital discharge (25%). Complete downloads are available for 173 witnessed cases and of these 140 were shocked: first-shock success, defined as termination of the fibrillatory waveform for 5 s or more, was achieved in 132 of them. When data quality permitted, the downloads were analysed with special reference to the numbers of compressions given and also to interruptions in compression sequences for ventilations, for rhythm analysis by the AED, for clinical checks, and for unexplained operator delays. The average rate of compressions during sequences was 120 min(-1), but because of interruptions, the actual number administered over a full minute from the first CPR prompt was a median of only 38. The speed of response by the lay first responders in relation to AED use was similar to that reported for healthcare professionals.

Automated external defibrillators: safety and efficacy in children and adolescents

Although children do not suffer from ventricular fibrillation (VF) as frequently as adults, it does occur in 10% to 20% of pediatric cardiac arrests. The technology is available to recognize and treat ventricular fibrillation in children as quickly as we can for adults. This article discusses the evidence to support automated external defibrillator use in young children. As this technology gains increased acceptance, resuscitation rates and outcomes for VF in children should approach those that are seen in adults.