Accuracy of frozen section examination of testicular tumors of uncertain origin

Regionalization of Testis Cancer Care-Is It Necessary?

Testicular germ cell tumors are rare genitourinary malignancies, but they represent the most common malignancies in men aged 15 to 30 years. Whereas the initial steps of management such as staging imaging studies, inguinal orchiectomy, and tumor marker can be performed elsewhere, the surgical and cytotoxic therapy needs to be done at reference centers. Regionalization of testis care has been shown to result in superior oncological outcome.

Diagnosis and management of indeterminate testicular lesions

The sophistication and accessibility of modern-day imaging result in frequent detection of small or equivocal lesions of the testes. Traditionally, diagnosis of a testicular lesion with any possibility of malignancy would usually prompt radical orchidectomy. However, awareness is growing that a substantial proportion of these lesions might be benign and that universal application of radical orchidectomy risks frequent overtreatment. Given the potentially profound effects of radical orchidectomy on fertility, endocrine function and psychosexual well-being, particularly in scenarios of an abnormal contralateral testis or bilateral lesions, organ-preserving strategies for equivocal lesions should be considered. Image-based active surveillance can be applied for indeterminate lesions measuring ≤15 mm with a low conversion rate to surgical treatment. However, these outcomes are early and from relatively small, selected cohorts, and concerns prevail regarding the metastatic potential of even small undiagnosed germ cell tumours. No consensus exists on optimal surveillance (short interval (<3 months) ultrasonography is generally adopted); histological sampling is a widespread alternative, involving inguinal delivery of the testis and excisional biopsy of the lesion, with preoperative marking or intraoperative ultrasonographic localization when necessary. Frozen section analysis in this context demonstrates excellent diagnostic accuracy. Histological results support that approximately two-thirds of marker-negative indeterminate solitary testicular lesions measuring ≤25 mm overall are benign. In summary, modern imaging detects many small indeterminate testicular lesions, of which the majority are benign. Awareness is growing of surveillance and organ-sparing diagnostic and treatment strategies with the aim of minimizing rates of overtreatment with radical orchidectomy.

The Safe Surgical Margin for the Testis Sparing Surgery in Testicular Cancer

BACKGROUND

Testis sparing surgery (TSS) has an important role in preserving the functional capacity of testicular cancer (TC). Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) lesions in the remaining testis have a significant risk for local recurrence.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the presence of satellite GCNIS lesions around the primary tumor and to measure the distance of the furthest GCNIS lesion to the primary tumor.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

The radical orchiectomy specimens of patients (n = 37) with a tumor size of ≤3 cm were reevaluated by the same pathologist. The satellite GCNIS lesions located around the primary tumor were detected, and the furthest GCNIS lesion distance to the primary tumor was measured under light microscopy.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size was 1,9 ± 0,6 cm. The mean furthest GCNIS distance to the primary tumor was 5,08 ± 2,77 mm. A total of 19 (51,4%) patients had the furthest GCNIS lesions <5 mm, and 28 (75,6%) patients had the furthest GCNIS lesions <7 mm away from the primary lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Leaving a 5 mm safety margin during TSS would lead to excise the satellite GCNIS lesions in half of the patients. Increasing the safety margin to 7 mm would lead to excise the satellite GCNIS lesions at 75% of the patients.

Critical elements of pediatric testicular germ cell tumors surgery

Children, adolescents and young adults with testicular germ cell tumors require appropriate surgical care to insure excellent outcomes. This article presents the most critical elements, and their basis in evidence, for surgery in this population. Specifically, the importance of inguinal radical orchiectomy for malignant tumors, partial orchiectomy for prepubertal tumors and normal serum tumor markers, and the appropriate use of post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in those with residual retroperitoneal masses.

Surgical management of prepubertal testicular tumors: A 30-year study in our institution

OBJECTIVES

The 2021 European Association of Urology-European Society for Paediatric Urology guidelines on Pediatric Urology recommended testis-sparing surgery (TSS) as the primary approach to treat prepubertal testicular tumors exhibiting favorable preoperative ultrasound diagnoses. However, prepubertal testicular tumors are rare and clinical data regarding them is limited. Here, we analyzed the surgical management of prepubertal testicular tumors based on cases observed over approximately 30 years.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively reviewed from medical records of consecutive patients aged <14 years with testicular tumors who received treatment at our institution between 1987 and 2020. We compared patients by their clinical characteristics, namely, those who underwent TSS versus radical orchiectomy (RO) and those who received surgery in 2005 onward versus prior to 2005.

RESULTS

We identified 17 patients, with a median age at surgery of 3.2 years (range 0.6-14.0) and a median tumor size of 15 mm (range 6-67). The tumor size was significantly smaller in patients who underwent TSS than in those who underwent RO (p = 0.007). Patients treated in 2005 onward were more likely to undergo TSS than those treated prior to 2005 (71% vs. 10%, respectively), without significant differences in tumor size or the rate of preoperative ultrasound. No TSS cases required conversion to RO.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent improvements in ultrasound imaging technology allow for more accurate clinical diagnosis. Therefore, the indications of TSS for prepubertal testicular tumors can be judged based not only on the tumor size but also on the diagnosis of benign tumors by preoperative ultrasound.

Radiological features characterising indeterminate testes masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The use of scrotal ultrasonography (SUS) has increased the detection rate of indeterminate testicular masses. Defining radiological characteristics that identify malignancy may reduce the number of men undergoing unnecessary radical orchidectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To define which SUS or scrotal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics can predict benign or malignant disease in pre- or post-pubertal males with indeterminate testicular masses.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidance. Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trials and systematic reviews databases were searched from (1970 to 26 March 2021). Benign and malignant masses were classified using the reported reference test: i.e., histopathology, or 12 months progression-free radiological surveillance. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 32 studies were identified, including 1692 masses of which 28 studies and 1550 masses reported SUS features, four studies and 142 masses reported MRI features. Meta-analysis of different SUS (B-mode) values in post-pubertal men demonstrated that a size of ≤0.5 cm had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of malignancy compared to masses of >0.5 cm (P < 0.001). Comparison of masses of 0.6-1.0 cm and masses of >1.5 cm also demonstrated a significantly lower OR of malignancy (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference between masses of 0.6-1.0 and 1.1-1.5 cm. SUS in post-pubertal men also had a statistically significantly lower OR of malignancy for heterogenous masses vs homogenous masses (P = 0.04), hyperechogenic vs hypoechogenic masses (P < 0.01), normal vs increased enhancement (P < 0.01), and peripheral vs central vascularity (P < 0.01), respectively. There were limited data on pre-pubertal SUS, pre-pubertal MRI and post-pubertal MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis identifies radiological characteristics that have a lower OR of malignancy and may be of value in the management of the indeterminate testis mass.

Intratesticular Leiomyoma: Lessons Learned From a Case Report and Another Contribution to Enlarge a Small World Series

Leiomyomas are benign, slow-growing, mesenchymal neoplasms that originate from smooth muscle. We report a case of a 44-year-old man presented with an asymptomatic left scrotal mass. Scrotal ultrasonography (US) showed a 3.9 cm well-limited, hypoechoic intratesticular mass. The patient underwent a radical left orchiectomy and histologic findings revealed an intratesticular leiomyoma. To our best knowledge, so far, this is the 19^th case of intratesticular leiomyoma to be reported in the literature. Furthermore, intraoperative frozen section examination should have been part of the management armamentarium in this case, leading to enhanced testicular preservation.

Testis-sparing Surgery in Adult Patients with Germ Cell Tumors: Systematic Search of the Literature and Focused Review

Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is a guideline-recommended treatment option for men with synchronous or metachronous bilateral testicular germ-cell tumor (GCT) or GCT in a solitary testicle. The tumor volume should not exceed 50% of the total testicular volume and serum concentrations of both testosterone and luteinizing hormone should be within the normal ranges. After tumor enucleation, patients should undergo adjuvant radiation of the testicle in case of germ cell neoplasia in situ. The local relapse rate is approximately 4% if TSS is performed properly. Physiological serum testosterone concentrations are achieved in more than 85% of patients, and approximately 50% of men with intact spermatogenesis can achieve paternity. The risk of systemic metastases is not increased by TSS. PATIENT SUMMARY: Testis-sparing surgery is the treatment of choice for men with testicular cancer in both testes or in men who have just one testis. In more than 85% of patients this approach results in maintenance of normal testosterone levels.

The Diagnostic Value of the Added MR Imaging of the Scrotum in the Preoperative Workup of Sonographically Indeterminate Testicular Lesions—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

Background: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of the scrotum in comparison with standard ultrasound (US) and histopathology. Methods: A retrospective multi-center analysis of MRI examinations of the scrotum performed between 06/2008 and 04/2021 was conducted. Results: A total of n = 113 patients were included. A total of 53 histopathologies were available, with 52.8% malignant and 50.9% benign findings. Related to histopathology, imaging was true negative, false negative, false positive, and true positive in 4.1%, 2.1%, 25.0% and 37.5% for standard ultrasound (US) and 9.1%, 1.8%, 25.5% and 43.6% for MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 94.7%, 20.0%, 36.0% and 88.9% for US and 85.7%, 72.8%, 52.1% and 93.7% for MRI, respectively. Benign lesions were significantly smaller than malignant ones in standard US (p = 0.001), histopathology (p = 0.001) and MRI (p = 0.004). The size of malignant tumors did not differ significantly between histopathology and standard US (0.72) and between histopathology and MRI (p = 0.88). Conclusions: MRI shows good sensitivity and specificity for the estimation of testicular tumors in this collective. Benign lesions are significantly smaller than malignant ones. Both MRI and US can estimate the size of malignant tumors adequately.

Testicular Lesions in Infertile Men

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of incidental testicular tumors are diagnosed in patients during infertility workup. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of frozen section examination (FSE) for the management of these tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a series of 46 testicular tumors diagnosed during exploration for infertility from 2000 to 2019 and submitted for FSE.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of malignancy was made in 23 cases on both gross examination (yellow-white or cream-colored nodules for seminomas) and FSE, then confirmed on final diagnosis in 22 of the cases. One seminoma reported on FSE was revised as being a Leydig cell tumor. The 23 other lesions were diagnosed as benign on FSE, including 11 Leydig cell tumors (yellow-brown nodules), 2 Leydig cell hyperplasias, and 10 whitish fibrous lesions. All Leydig cell lesions were confirmed except 1, which was reclassified as a Sertoli cell tumor. Of the 10 cases of fibrous lesions, 6 were associated with malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of Leydig cell tumors and the accuracy of FSE for these lesions demonstrate the interest in FSE. In contrast, FSE is not reliable for fibrous lesions, and surgeons should be aware that a fibrosis result often corresponds with regressed tumors.

Frozen-section examination in the management of paediatric testicular lesions

PURPOSE

Paediatric testicular and para-testicular lesions have traditionally been managed according to adult protocols. Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) has gained popularity as it has become apparent benign lesions predominate in childhood. Frozen-section examination (FSE) for intra-operative diagnosis has been extensively utilised in adults, though its use in paediatric practice remains limited. We reviewed our experience of FSE in paediatric patients with an aim to identify the utility and efficacy of this tool in the management of testicular and para-testicular pathology.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-centre review of paediatric patients who underwent intra-operative FSE for a range of testicular and para-testicular lesions was performed. FSE results were compared to final pathology. TSS was performed if appropriate, and was utilised in adolescent patients, and in lesions with a diameter greater than 20 mm.

RESULTS

Nine males underwent FSE from 2013 to 2020. Median age at surgery was 9 years (range 1-15). Eight (89%) patients had benign pathology. FSE result correlated with the final pathological examination in 100% of cases. FSE facilitated TSS in 7/9 cases.

CONCLUSION

FSE has 100% diagnostic accuracy for paediatric testicular and para-testicular pathology. We would recommend all lesions be evaluated by FSE to guide intra-operative decision making and facilitate TSS in appropriate cases.

Oncological and functional outcomes of testis sparing surgery in small testicular mass: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of testicular tumor is constantly increasing, with an estimated incidence rate of about 3-10 new cases per 100,000 males/per year. Radical orchiectomy or testis sparing surgery (TSS) are recognized therapeutic approaches in these cases. However, the risk for hypogonadism and infertility is higher with the former compared with the latter. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the oncological outcome and testicular function (endocrine and reproductive aspects) in patients who had undergone TSS for small testicular lesions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

To accomplish this, 684 articles were retrieved and screened; 24 retrospective and two prospective studies were selected and finally included in this systematic review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall the TSS attempts were 1096 but TSS was definitively performed in 603 cases (55%). Frozen section examination was performed in 996 TSS attempts (22 out of the 26 studies selected) and showed a benign histology in 37-100% of cases, a malignant histology in 0-63%, and an inconclusive result in 0-16%, respectively. Five studies reported that a total of 22 patients were able to father after conservative surgery. None of these studies reported cases of hypotestosteronemia after surgery and a low prevalence (1.66%) of complications was associated with this type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, TSS showed to be safe and practicable if used according to the specific guidelines. It can be safely performed to treat recurrence eventually associated to local adjuvant radiotherapy when an intra-tubular neoplasia is present. Urologists can therefore consider TSS as an important means against testicular tumor in selected and well-informed patients.

Zero-ischemia testis-sparing surgery for probably benign pediatric testicular tumors

Permanent ischemia-induced testicular damage may occur as early as 30 min in prepupertal rats. With the goal of potentially enhancing testicular function and fertility preservation, we performed testis-sparing surgery (TSS) without ischemia for testicular lesions in select children with negative markers and high likelihood of benignity on ultrasonography. Preliminary experience suggests that off-clamp TSS should be more liberally encouraged, especially in infants and prepubertal children, given their particularly vulnerable spermatic cord elements.

Testis Sparing Surgery in Pediatric Testicular Tumors

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of testis sparing surgery (TSS) and to investigate under which circumstances TSS can be considered a safe treatment option in pediatric patients with testicular tumors.

METHODS

A database search was performed in Cochrane, Pubmed, and Embase for studies that focused on TSS as treatment for testicular tumors in the pediatric population, excluding reviews and single case reports.

RESULTS

Twenty studies, describing the surgical treatment of 777 patients with testicular tumors, were included in the analysis. The majority of pediatric patients with benign germ cell tumors (GCTs) (mean age: 3.7 years) and sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) (mean age: 6.6 years) were treated with TSS, 61.9% and 61.2%, respectively. No cases of testicular atrophy occurred. Four of the benign GCTs, i.e., three teratomas and one epidermoid cyst, recurred. No cases of recurrence were reported in patients with SCSTs. Of the 243 malignant GCTs (mean age: 4.2 years), only one patient had TSS (0.4%).

CONCLUSION

TSS is a safe treatment option for prepubertal patients less than 12 years of age with benign GCTs and low grade SCSTs.

Partial orchiectomy vs. radical orchiectomy for pediatric testis tumors

While radical orchiectomy remains the gold standard for testicular cancer, partial orchiectomy has become a well-accepted organ-sparing approach for benign testicular tumors in pre-pubertal patients. The aims of testicular-sparing surgery include prevention of over-treatment, preservation of future hormonal and reproductive function, and provision of a durable cure. For pre-pubertal patients, who have a high likelihood of benign lesions, partial orchiectomy provides effective treatment, owing to the high reliability of scrotal ultrasound (US) and intraoperative frozen section. In adolescent and young adult patients, who are more likely to harbor malignant pathology, the role of partial orchiectomy is less clear. Testis-sparing surgery is being reported with greater frequency in the adult literature for small testicular masses and for situations in which radical orchiectomy would result in an anorchia. More recently, a testis-sparing approach has also been described for carefully-selected post-pubertal pediatric patients. This review will highlight the role of partial orchiectomy in pediatric patients (<18 years old).

Organ-Sparing Surgery in Testicular Tumor: Is This the Right Approach for Lesions ≤ 20 mm?

Background: This study was conducted in order to analyze factors predicting malignancy in patients undergoing organ-sparing surgery (OSS) for small testicular lesions. Methods: Patients with small (≤20 mm) marker-negative clinical stage I testicular tumors were managed by OSS with tumor enucleation and frozen section examination (FSE) for the past 15 years at our institution. Benign and malignant cases were compared, focusing on preoperative and postoperative lesion sizes. Results: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Ten (11.2%) of them were treated for synchronous bilateral tumors. Sixty-seven (67.7%) of ninety-nine lesions were benign, confirming a high concordance rate (98%) between FSE and final histology. Patients with benign tumors were significantly older than patients with malignant tumors (p = 0.026), and benign tumors were detected more frequently during urologic work-up of hormone disorders (p = 0.001). Preoperative tumor size was a strong predictor of malignancy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.726; p < 0.001). According to the Youden index, the best cutoff to predict tumor dignity was 13.5 mm, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of 53% and 85%, respectively. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis were confirmed after a median follow-up of 42 months. Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with previous reports, supporting an OSS approach in small testicular tumors whenever possible. Most tumors ≤ 20 mm were benign, and in the case of malignancy, OSS with FSE and consecutive orchiectomy is oncologically safe due to the high concordance rate of FSE and final histology, thus preventing a two-stage procedure.

Clinical presentation, management and follow-up of 83 patients with Leydig cell tumors of the testis: a prospective case-cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

When should ‘not so rare’ Leydig cell tumors (LCTs) of the testis be suspected, diagnosed, and treated?

SUMMARY ANSWER

LCTs are more frequent than generally believed, are associated with male infertility, cryptorchidism and gynecomastia, and should be treated conservatively (in compliant patients) with active surveillance, which appears to be a safe alternative to surgical enucleation.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Increasing referrals for testicular imaging have led to an increase in findings of LCTs. The features and natural history of these tumors remain largely unknown, as the available studies are small and heterogeneous. LCTs were previously treated aggressively and follow-up data are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A case-cohort study of consecutive patients diagnosed with LCTs over a 10-year period was prospectively enrolled from 2009 to 2018 and compared to matched cohorts of patients with seminomas or no testicular lesions screened in the same timeframe.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Of the 9949 inpatients and outpatients referred for scrotal ultrasound, a total of 83 men with LCTs were included. Enrolled subjects underwent medical history and clinical examination and were asked to undergo routine blood tests, hormone investigations (FSH, LH, total testosterone, estradiol, inhibin B, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), prolactin), and semen analysis. Patients who consented also underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, gadolinium-enhanced scrotal magnetic resonance imaging, and hCG stimulation test (5000 IU i.m.) with serum total testosterone and estradiol measured at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 83 patients diagnosed with LCTs were compared against 90 patients diagnosed with seminoma and 2683 patients without testicular lesions (NoL). LCTs were diagnosed by enucleation (48.2%), orchiectomy (13.3%), or clinical surveillance (38.5%). Testicular volume, sperm concentration, and morphology were lower (P = 0.001, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively) in patients with LCTs than in the NoL group. FSH, LH, and SHBG were higher and the testosterone/LH ratio was lower in LCTs than in the NoL group (P < 0.001). The LCT group showed higher SHBG (P = 0.018), lower sperm concentration (P = 0.029), and lower motility (P = 0.049) than the seminoma group. Risk factors for LCTs were cryptorchidism (χ² = 28.27, P < 0.001), gynecomastia (χ² = 54.22, P < 0.001), and low testicular volume (χ² = 11.13, P = 0.001). Five cases were recurrences or bilateral lesions; none developed metastases during follow-up (median, 66 months).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study has some limitations. First, hCG and second-line diagnostic investigations were not available for all tumor patients. Second, ours is a referral center for infertility, thus a selection bias may have altered the baseline features of the LCT population. However, given that the comparison cohorts were also from the same center and had been managed with a similar protocol, we do not expect a significant effect.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

LCTs are strongly associated with male infertility, cryptorchidism, and gynecomastia, supporting the hypothesis that testicular dysgenesis syndrome plays a role in their development. Patients with LCTs are at a greater risk of endocrine and spermatogenesis abnormalities even when the tumor is resected, and thus require long-term follow-up and prompt efforts to preserve fertility after diagnosis.

LCTs have a good oncological prognosis when recognized early, as tissue-sparing enucleation is curative and should replace orchiectomy. Conservative surgery and, in compliant patients, active surveillance through clinical and radiological follow-up are safe options, but require monitoring of testicular failure and recurrence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The project was funded by the Ministry of University and Research Grant MIUR 2015ZTT5KB. There are no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ALCeP trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206270).

The role of partial orchidectomy in the management of small testicular tumours: Fertility and endocrine function

BACKGROUND

Radical orchidectomy in patients who are subsequently diagnosed with benign testicular tumours represents an overtreatment due to the deleterious effects on endogenous testosterone, fertility and body image. For these reasons, the option of partial orchidectomy (PO) should be considered in certain groups of patients. Patients with bilateral tumours (synchronous or metachronous) or a solitary testis where the lesion is no greater than 30% of the volume of the testis could be considered for a PO. Evidence has shown that PO is effective for small testicular masses with excellent survival and recurrence rates.

OBJECTIVES

Highlight the feasibility of maintaining post-operative fertility or normal semen parameters and endocrine function following PO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for this review were obtained through a search of the PubMed database. Papers were required to be in English and focus on adult human males.

RESULTS

Eligible and relevant papers were assessed for data regarding fertility, semen parameters and endocrine function following PO for a small testicular mass (STM).

CONCLUSION

It is possible to preserve both fertility and endocrine function after PO. Although patients may still require adjuvant radiotherapy for concomitant intratubular germ cell neoplasia (ITGCN) which results in subfertility, endocrine function is still conserved. However, it is possible to postpone radiotherapy and continue with clinical surveillance for the purposes of fertility preservation.

Partial orchiectomy: The Princess Margaret cancer centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Radical orchiectomy (RO) is the standard treatment for a testis cancer. Organ sparing surgery can be considered in the setting of a solitary functioning testis or bilateral tumors. It has also been suggested as an alternative to RO for small lesions. In this study we report our partial orchiectomy (PO) experience.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review using our prospectively maintained database analyzing PO.

RESULTS

Between 1983 and 2018, 77 patients underwent PO. Mean age was 31.3 years (range 17-56). A lesion was palpable in 70 (90.9%) and median lesion size 14.1 mm (range 3-35 mm). Reasons for PO included ``small lesion" in 39 (50.6%); solitary functioning testis in 30 (39%); bilateral lesions in 6 (7.8%); or assumed benign lesion in 1 (1.3%). Median follow-up was 43.5 months (range 1-258). Lesion histology was benign in 25 (32.5%). A positive surgical margin was noted in 6 (7.8%) with none developing local or distant recurrence. Sixteen (20.8%) patients underwent salvage ipsilateral RO at a median of 3 months (range 0-46). Reasons for salvage RO included a radiologically detected lesion in 7, palpable lesion in 4, positive surgical margin in 3 and adverse pathology in 2 patients. Malignant histology was present in 12 (75%) of the salvage RO specimens. There were no reported Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 to 5 complications.

CONCLUSION

Organ sparing surgery is a safe and feasible approach to small testis lesions. For the third with benign disease, and even those with malignant histology, a RO can be avoided in carefully selected patients.

Bilateral Synchronous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors in Children: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Bilateral testicular tumors are very rare in pediatric patients and only a few case reports have been reported. These patients have a high risk of sterility due to bilateral orchiectomy and subsequent gonadotoxic treatments. Therefore, if possible, testis-sparing surgery should be performed in patients with benign masses and testicular tissue preservation may be recommended in order to maintain fertility in later life. We present a 23 months old boy with synchronous bilateral testicular tumor managed with unilateral orchiectomy and testis-sparing surgery and testicular tissue cryopreservation performed to the controlateral side. We also review the literature on bilateral testis tumors in children.

Testis-preserving strategies in testicular germ cell tumors and germ cell neoplasia in situ

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) are rare malignancies which affect young adults and adolescents between the ages of 15 and 40 years. In suspected malignant TGCT, the treatment of choice is radical orchiectomy. However, in specific cases this routine surgical approach has been challenged in favor of an organ-preserving approach with comparable oncological outcome. Thus, testis-preserving strategies should be considered in unilateral or bilateral synchronous or metachronous TGCT as well as incidentally found small testicular masses, which are mostly benign lesions including Sertoli cell tumors, Leydig cell tumors, adenomatoid tumors or epidermoid cysts. In case of a testis-preserving surgery, adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy (20 Gy) is recommended. The rational for this approach is that the remaining parenchyma harbors germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), which might lead to locally recurrent TGCT in 50% in the next following 5 years. However, testicular radiotherapy might result in infertility and 'Sertoli-cell only' syndrome because of radiation-induced destruction of germ cells as well as Leydig cell insufficiency in 20% of all patients leading to life-long androgen substitution. Therefore, radiation therapy should be delay or sperm banking be should performed in fertile patients wish to have children. This review provides an overview on literature regarding testis-preserving strategies in TGCT as well as GCNIS.

Therapeutic strategies for uncommon testis cancer histologies: teratoma with malignant transformation and malignant testicular sex cord stromal tumors

Testicular cancer is the most common solid malignancy in male adolescents and young adults, with germ cell derived seminomas and non-seminomas being by far the most common histologies. Teratoma with somatic-type malignancy is a rare chemo-resistant phenotype of testis cancer associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced stage disease. Malignant gonadal-stromal tumors comprise 5% of testicular neoplasms and approximately 10% are malignant and considered chemo-radiation resistant. Prognostic factors and treatment strategies for these uncommon histologies are lacking.

Management of Primary Testicular Tumor

In any man with a solid testicular mass, cancer should be considered until proven otherwise. Radical inguinal orchiectomy is the treatment of choice in patients with testis mass. Placement of a testicular prosthesis is safe with a very low complication rate and should be offered to all patients undergoing radical orchiectomy. In patients with widespread or life-threatening advanced disease, delayed orchiectomy following chemotherapy is recommended. Testis-sparing surgery can be performed in highly selected patients with solitary testicle mass, bilateral testicular tumors, or strong suspicion of a benign lesion.

Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 2-organ-sparing procedures in testicular and penile tumors

PURPOSE

Organ-sparing surgery (OSS) is recommended in selected patients with testicular tumors and penile cancer (PC). The functional and psychological impacts of organ excision for these genital tumors are profound. In this review, we summarize the indications, techniques and outcomes of OSS for these two tumors.

METHODS

PubMed^® was searched for relevant articles up to December 2018. For Testicular sparing surgery (TSS) search, keywords used were; testicular tumors alone and in combination with "testicular sparing surgery", "partial orchiectomy" and outcomes. For penile conserving surgery (PCS), keywords used were: penile cancer alone and in combination with "penile conserving surgery", "partial penectomy" and outcomes. Because of the low quality of available evidence, a narrative rather that systematic review has been performed.

RESULTS

Indications of TSS are tumors ≤ 2 cm in solitary testis or bilateral tumors and no rete testis invasion. Prerequisites include normal testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels and patient compliance with follow-up. Indications for PCS are distal penile lesions with clinical stage ≤ T1. Adequate penile stump (3 cm) is required after surgery to maintain forward urine stream. Frozen section helps to reduce the risk of recurrence. Local recurrence after PCS is not associated with reduced survival and can be managed with another PCS in selected patients. The reported oncological and functional outcomes following TSS and PCS are adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

In properly selected patient OSS in testicular and penile tumors has a comparable oncological outcome to total organ excision with added advantages of preserving organ function and psychological well-being.

Germ Cell Neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) in Testis-Sparing Surgery (TSS) for Small Testicular Masses (STMs)

Purpose: The testis-sparing surgery (TSS) is surgical technique accepted for small testicular masses (STMs). Frozen section examination (FSE) is an essential assessment at the time of TSS. The aim of this study is to measure the maximum distance of the foci of ITGCN from STMs. Methods: In our hospital between June 2010 and October 2017 a total of 68 patients with STM underwent a TSS. All the testis specimens were totally embedded and processed via the whole-mount method and a diagnosis of germ cell tumor with GCNIS were made. The distance between STMs and GCNIS were calculated by two pathologists directly on the slides considering for the third dimension the number of the paraffin blocks in which the foci of GCNIS were found. Results: The STMs were classic seminoma in 62 out 68 cases, embryonal carcinoma in 4 cases, while in 2 case a diagnose of mixed germ cell tumor were made. The size of the STMs was between 0.5 and 2 cm and the foci of GCNIS were observed in seminiferous tubules very closed to SMTs or as skip lesions in the surrounding testicular parenchyma, dispersed in normal testis. In 48 out of 68 cases (70.5%) foci of GCNIS were at the distance from SMTS of 1.5 cm or below and in 60 out of 68 cases (88%) at the distance of 2 cm or below The distance of GCNIS from the STMs was not related to the histological subtype of the germ cell tumor, while there is a linear correlation between size of the STMs and the distance of foci of GCNIS (p = 0.0105; r = 0.9167). Conclusion: Our data showed that foci of ITGCN were not observed beyond 2.5 cm from the STM. In particular we demonstrated that exist a linear correlation between size of STMs and distance of the foci of GCNIS from STMs (p = 0.0105; r = 0.9167). In conclusion mapping the tissue around the tumor not randomly but in targeted areas could reduce the false negative biopsies of the testis with GCNIS, increasing the radicality of the TSS procedure.

Testis sparing surgery for small testicular masses and frozen section assessment

Introduction

We present our experience with patients who had suspected testicular masses, managed by a frozen section assessment and testicular sparing surgery.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective review of all patients over the last 5 years, who underwent a frozen section assessment and testicular sparing surgery for small testicular lesions. The frozen section assessment was compared with the final histology.

Results

Twelve patients were identified. The mean age of patients was 40 years (22–58 years). The mean lesion size was 9.8 mm (3–18 mm). Presentations varied: a testicular lump was palpable in 7 patients and 3 patients were referred due to infertility with a subsequent ultrasound, which showed incidental testicular lesions. Two patients presented with testicular pain. Tumour marker levels were within the normal limits in all patients.

The frozen section assessment correctly determined 10 out of 12 (83%) lesions, showing 1 (8%) lymphoma, 2 (17%) seminomas, 3 (25%) fibrosis, 3 (25%) low-grade Leydig cell tumours and 1 (8%) adenomatous tumour. The frozen section reported a benign epidermal cyst in 1 case, whilst the final histology showed a pre-pubertal type teratoma, a rare and low risk tumour. One patient (8%) had an indeterminate lesion, which proved to be a benign adenomatous tumour on final histology. All malignant cases were correctly identified.

There was no malignancy in 9 out of 12 (75%) patients therefore they had testicular sparing surgery. Three patients had orchidectomy, two due to a seminoma and one due to an indeterminate lesion. One patient developed a postoperative haematoma requiring antibiotics but there were no other complications.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that partial orchidectomy with a frozen section assessment is useful in small testicular masses and testicular sparing surgery can be considered in order to prevent a radical orchidectomy in selected patients.

Testis Sparing Surgery for Benign Testicular Masses: Diagnostics and Therapeutic Approaches

PURPOSE

Small benign testicular masses are often misinterpreted as germ cell tumors and immediate inguinal orchiectomy is performed. We analyzed the diagnostic and therapeutic workup of testicular masses to improve preoperative stratification algorithms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single center analysis of the records of 522 patients diagnosed with primary testicular masses of unknown malignant potential.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (5%) showed a primary benign tumor after resection, including Leydig cell tumors in 9 (32%), epidermoid cysts in 9 (32%), adenomatoid tumors in 8 (29%) and Sertoli cell tumors in 2 (7%). The median volume of benign tumors was significantly less than that of malignant tumors (0.75 cm³, range 0.1 to 2.1 vs 15, range 4.5-39.9, p ≤0.001). At a cutoff of 2.8 cm³ tumor volume most accurately differentiated between benign and malignant disease, and it was a predictor of malignancy with 83% sensitivity and 89% specificity (OR 1.389, 95% CI 1.035-1.864, p = 0.029). Symptom duration in patients with benign tumors was significantly longer (365 days, range 25.5 to 365 vs 20, range 7 to 42, p ≤0.001). Also, tumor markers were unaltered in benign lesions. In patients with benign tumors significantly more fertility disorders or cryptorchidism were found (p ≤0.001) as well as a tendency toward lower testosterone (3.9 μg/l, range 0.9 to 4.9 vs 5.3, range 3.5 to 6.8, p = 0.084). Testis sparing surgery was performed in 22 of all patients (79%) with benign tumors. There was no case of relapse during followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Nongerm cell tumors should be considered when small testicular masses have a volume of less than 2.8 cm³ and there are hormone disorders or normal tumor markers. Immediate orchiectomy should be avoided, favoring testis sparing surgery.

Testicle-sparing surgery versus radical orchiectomy in the management of Leydig cell tumors: results from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the oncological outcomes of testicle-sparing surgery (TSS) and radical orchiectomy (RO) in patients with Leydig cell tumor (LCT) of the testis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective clinical study was conducted in 12 centers in France. All the patients with histologically proven LCT were included and analyzed according to treatment (organ-sparing surgery or radical orchiectomy). Patients underwent preoperative clinical, biological and imaging assessment. Demographic, clinical, and pathological variables were collected at baseline and compared between groups according to surgical treatment. Follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimation and was updated at the end of 2015.

RESULTS

Between 1986 and 2014, 56 patients presented with LCT were identified and included in the study. Twenty-one patients (37.5%) underwent TSS and 35 (62.5%) RO. Demographics and tumor characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Median follow-up was 62 months after TSS, but only 35 months after RO. Two patients (9.5%) developed local recurrence 15 and 34 months after TSS and underwent secondary RO. No local recurrence or metastasis was observed after complementary treatment. No recurrence was observed after RO. Disease-free survival did not differ between the groups (95.2% in TSS versus 77.1% in the RO group, p = 0.23). No patient died in the TSS group, but three patients (8.6%) in the RO group died from other diseases without evidence of relapse. One patient (4.8%) in the TSS group versus five (14.3%) in the RO group were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Long-term follow-up suggests that testicle-sparing surgery does not compromise relapse-free survival in the treatment of Leydig cell tumor of the testis.

The natural history of Leydig cell testicular tumours: an analysis of the National Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Leydig cell tumour (LCT) of the testis is a rare histological subtype of stromal tumours, accounting for 1 to 3% of testicular neoplasms. The natural history of LCT is poorly understood.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and natural history of Leydig cell tumours (LCT) of the testes.

METHODS

A search of the National Cancer Registry of Ireland database was performed regarding Leydig cell testicular tumours. Recurrence free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analysed.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2013, 2755 new cases of testicular cancer were diagnosed in Ireland. Of these, 22 (0.79%) were Leydig cell tumours. Nineteen were invasive (stage T1) and three were in situ (stage Tis). One patient developed a local recurrence following an organ preserving procedure and underwent a completion orchidectomy 107 days after initial diagnosis. No further treatment was required. There have been no disease-specific deaths. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 95.5, 88.2 and 73.3%, respectively. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 100% and the 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 93.3%.

CONCLUSION

From the National Cancer Registry, LCT has been shown to be a rare subtype of testicular tumour. Due to the relatively favourable natural history, it may be possible to tailor less aggressive surveillance regimens in these patients.

Evaluation of the decision-making process in the conservative approach to small testicular masses

INTRODUCTION

We evaluate the clinical outcome of patients treated with conservative approach for small testicular masses (STMs). We analyzed the steps who brought to the selection of the therapeutic approach: starting from clinical presentation, through imaging and lab studies.

METHODS

We considered 18 patients who underwent an organ-sparing approach for STMs from 2005 until 2014. The selection criteria were dimension of the mass and absence of clinical, laboratory and/or radiological malignancy suspicion. Preoperative scrotal ultrasound (US) was carried out in all the patients by the same radiologist. The postoperative fertility profile was evaluated in patients younger than 40 years.

RESULTS

We performed 13 enucleations, one partial orchiectomy (PO) and four active surveillances. During surgery, a frozen section examination (FSE) was always requested and no discrepancies were noted between its results and the definitive histology. Only one seminomatous tumor was identified, while the remaining masses were four necrosis, four epidermoid cysts, three Leydig tumors, one Sertoli tumor and one chronic orchitis. After a mean follow-up of 41.6 ± 24.7 months, all the patients resulted free of disease and hypogonadism and five of them reached the fatherhood after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and instrumental evaluation consented an accurate selection of patients eligible for the organ-preserving approach. We believe that testis-sparing surgery leads good functional and aesthetic results in patients with benign lesions; it is a safe option for STMs with a reliable pathologist performing FSE and is an important goal in young patients with fatherhood desire.

Testis sparing surgery for Leydig cell pathologies in children

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to analyze testis-sparing surgical procedures in boys with Leydig cell pathologies.

STUDY DESIGN

The hospital records of four boys with Leydig cell hyperplasia who underwent testis-sparing surgery for testicular masses between 2000 and 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Tumor markers were evaluated and all boys underwent scrotal ultrasonography preoperatively. The hormonal profile was also analyzed for symptoms of precocious puberty. The testis was delivered through a high transverse inguinal incision and the tumor was excised by enucleation. After confirming the benign nature of the tumor with frozen-section examination, the testis was reinserted and fixed into the scrotum with absorbable sutures. All cases were followed-up with physical examination, scrotal ultrasonography, and measurement of β-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), α-fetoprotein, and hormone levels.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 9.4 years (1.5-15 years). Testicular mass and scrotal asymmetry were detected in all cases. Ultrasonography was the main initial diagnostic modality for detecting testicular masses (Table). β-HCG and α-fetoprotein levels were normal. Three cases had Leydig cell hyperplasia and one patient was diagnosed to have a Leydig cell tumor. Signs of precocious puberty were detected in the four patients. The mean follow-up period was 4.8 years (2-8 years). Neither recurrence nor testicular atrophy developed in the follow-up. Findings of precocious puberty continued in one patient with Leydig cell hyperplasia, in whom a 2-mm contralateral metachronous lesion was detected and enucleated successfully.

DISCUSSION

Testis-sparing surgery with its potential long-term psychological, cosmetic, and functional advantages should be used in pediatric patients in whom a benign Leydig cell pathology is confirmed histopathologically.

CONCLUSION

This intervention with good long-term results can easily be applied through a proper dissection plane in the testicle. Since testicular Leydig cell tumors in childhood have small rates of recurrence, this choice of treatment is efficient in patients with salvageable testicular tissues and normal levels of tumor markers.

Reliability of Frozen Section Examination in a Large Cohort of Testicular Masses: What Did We Learn?

BACKGROUND

Frozen section examination (FSE) for testicular masses is gaining popularity because of the possibility of performing testis-sparing surgery (TSS) on the basis of the FSE results. The aim of our study was to investigate the reliability of FSE in the diagnosis of testicular masses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1999 to 2016, 144 of 692 patients who underwent surgery in our tertiary center for testicular masses had FSE. The indications for FSE were: masses < 1 cm, nonpalpable, multiple, or with unusual presentation. Mean follow-up for patients was 25.5 months. The algorithm of surgery determined by FSE was: orchiectomy if malignant or nonconclusive pathology; TSS if benign or nontumor pathology. FSE data were analyzed retrospectively. Specificity and sensitivity of the method was calculated for benign, malignant, seminoma, and nonseminoma tumors.

RESULTS

Intraoperative FSE was conducted on 21% of candidates for surgery on testicular masses. The sensitivity and specificity of FSE were 93% and 98%, respectively, for malignant tumors, and 90% and 99%, respectively, for benign tumors. The κ agreement coefficient between FSE and final histopathology was statistically significant (0.76). TSS was performed in 57 (40%) patients, including 6 of 23 monorchid patients.

CONCLUSION

FSE correlates well with final histopathological diagnosis of testicular masses. Thus, it reliably identifies patients who might benefit from TSS. FSE should be considered always in small, nonpalpable, multiple, or uncommonly presenting masses in solitary testis or both testes.

Organ-sparing surgery for testicular tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Testicular cancer represents the majority of testicular masses, and radical orchiectomy is still considered the standard-of-care. Testis-sparing surgery (TSS) can be an alternative to radical surgery in patients with small testicular tumours, bilateral or solitary testis masses. The aim of this manuscript is to review the current indications, oncological and functional outcomes of TSS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our review confirmed that literature lacks studies with a high level of evidence on comparing TSS with radical surgery. Indications for TSS are controversial, specifically for patients with normal contralateral testis. For nonpalpable testicular masses less than 2 cm, bilateral tumours and solitary testis mass, TSS seems to be a viable treatment option. Frozen-section examination is a critical tool for assessment at the time of TSS that allows for diagnosis of benign from malignant tumours and evaluation of margin. TSS has been shown to be associated with less fertility alterations, hormonal deficit and potential lower impact on sexual and psychosocial aspects. Intermediate to long-term follow-up results have not revealed any significant risk of local and/or distant recurrences after TSS.

SUMMARY

TSS is well tolerated and feasible for selected patients with testicular mass without compromising oncological and functional outcomes. Further studies with a higher level of evidence are needed to confirm these findings.

Testis-Sparing Surgery in Small Testicular Masses Not Suspected to Be Malignant

Fifteen patients with small testicular masses not suspected to be malignant were included in the study, and permanent and frozen section analyses were evaluated. As a result frozen analysis, preoperative externalization of the suspected malignancy with a physical examination, ultrasonographic evaluation, and serum tumor marker analysis were concluded as key points for accurate decision making between TSS and radical orchiectomy.

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the safety, efficacy, and the concordance of permanent and frozen section analysis (FSA) of testis-sparing surgery (TSS) in patients who had small testicular masses that were not suspected to be malignant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients who underwent TSS were included in the study. TSS was performed for the patients who had testicular lesions <25 mm and testicular lesion volume <30% of the whole testis. All patients had normal serum tumor marker levels and ultrasonographic evaluation did not indicate malignancy. Surgery was performed via an inguinal approach with temporary cord occlusion and FSA of the lesions. Benign findings allowed for TSS, and cancer prompted total orchiectomy.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 25.33 (range, 20-36) years. The predominant complaint was swelling (9 patients). The mean lesion diameter was 16 mm (range, 5-26 mm). Fourteen of all cases (93%) had benign pathology and underwent TSS. Only 1 patient, whose FSA revealed malignant formation, underwent radical orchiectomy. Final pathology of this patient was seminoma. Complete histopathologic concordance was observed between the results of frozen and permanent sections. TSS was performed with no intra- or postoperative complications. After a mean follow-up of 23 months (range, 6-44 months) all patients, except 3 who were lost to follow-up, were free of disease.

CONCLUSION

The main key points for accurate decision-making between TSS and radical orchiectomy are intraoperative FSA and preoperative externalization of possible suspected malignancy with physical examination, ultrasonographic evaluation, and serum tumor marker analysis.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided testicle-sparing surgery for small testicular masses

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate evolution of conservative echo-guided surgery for testicular tumours ≤1.5 cm and to assess the safety of this surgical procedure.

METHODS

49 consecutive patients diagnosed with ultrasonography testicular lesions (mono or bilateral) ≤1.5 cm and treated with conservative echo-guided testicular surgery were examined. The parameters considered in this retrospective analysis included case history, physical examination, scrotal and abdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography scan, size of the nodule (maximum diameter), tumour markers, chest radiography, frozen section examination, histologic size of the tumour, overall survival (OS) and findings on follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 33 years (range 18-62). Patients who presented with a palpable testicular nodule were 32.7 %, gynecomastia 10.2 %, precocious pseudopuberty 4 %, and scrotal pain 12.2 %. Permanent section examination confirmed the FSE data in all cases of certainty malignant lesion and definitive histological types were: 22 seminoma, 13 non-seminomatous or mixed germ cell tumours, 4 Leydig tumours, 2 hamartoma, 1 epidermoid cyst, 2 sertoli cell tumours, and 5 fibrous pseudotumour. No complications intra- and postoperative were observed. Overall survival was 100 % and scrotal US showed evidence of local tumour recurrence in 6 patients (12.2 %) after a mean follow-up of 34.7 months.

CONCLUSION

The OS, the low rate of local recurrence, and absence of complications, tend to demonstrate the safety of the procedure. The benefits to testicular-sparing surgery include improving the patient's overall quality of life, fertility, endocrine function and negative cosmetic effects of radical orchiectomy.

The role of testis-sparing surgery in children and adolescents with testicular tumors

Organ-sparing approaches have been applied to the treatment of a variety of urologic tumors in both the realms of adult and pediatric urology, with the goals of minimizing overtreatment of benign lesions, preserving function, and providing durable cure. The predominance of benign tumors in prepubertal patients and the reliability of both ultrasound and intraoperative frozen sections have resulted in a marked shift toward testis-sparing approaches over the last few decades. The role of testis sparing in the adolescent population is presently unclear, although there have been increasing reports of successful organ-sparing surgery for testis tumors in the adult literature. This review presents recent trends in testis-sparing approaches for both pediatric and adolescent patients, the operative technique, and some of the controversies related to testis-sparing surgery.

Fourteen-year experience with the intraoperative frozen section examination of testicular lesion in a tertiary university center

Most testicular tumors are germ cell neoplasias. The number of incidentally detected small-sized, nonpalpable testicular lesions is increasing with the use of high-frequency ultrasound for infertility or trauma. These lesions are benign in 80% of cases and can be treated by organ-sparing surgery on the basis of frozen section examination (FSE). We assess the reliability of FSE in testicular and paratesticular lesions and its possible impact on surgical management. We performed a retrospective review of intraoperative FSE in testicular/paratesticular lesions at Geneva University Hospital during a 14-year period. A total of 170 cases were identified, with 159 testicular and 11 paratesticular lesions. The FSE results, permanent sections, and orchiectomy slides were reviewed and compared. Frozen section examinations were reported to be benign in 9 paratesticular and in 43 testicular lesions, and malignant in 2 paratesticular and 105 testicular lesions. Comparing FSE and final diagnosis, FSE correctly identified all nontumor lesions. There was a failure rate of 3.5% to identify tumor. Specificity was 100%, sensitivity was 95%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 89%. Frozen section examination is a highly sensitive and specific intraoperative procedure, which allows to differentiate between benign and malignant testicular and paratesticular lesions, with a possibility of organ-sparing surgery when they are benign.

Overview of pediatric testicular tumors in Korea

Prepubertal testicular tumors are rare compared with postpubertal testicular tumors. The incidence of prepubertal testicular tumors peaks at 2 years of age, tapers off after 4 years of age, and then begins to rise again at puberty. Prepubertal and postpubertal testicular tumors show many differences, including the typical tumor histology, molecular biological differences, and the malignant potential of tumors at different ages. Pediatric testicular tumors are classified as benign or malignant on the basis of their clinical behavior and histologically are divided into germ cell and gonadal stromal (nongerm cell) tumors. Many histological and biological studies have further confirmed the distinct nature of prepubertal and postpubertal testicular tumors. These differences have led to various management strategies for prepubertal and postpubertal tumors. Because overall about 75% of prepubertal testicular tumors are benign, a testis-sparing approach is becoming more common in children. Orchiectomy and observation with very selective use of chemotherapy has become the standard approach when a malignant tumor is identified. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection and radiation therapy play very limited roles.

[Importance of pathology for therapy planning of testicular germ cell tumors]

Testicular tumors can be divided into germ cell tumors and sex cord stromal tumors. Malignant testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) represent about 90-95 % of all testicular tumors and are the most common solid neoplasms in young men aged 20-40 years with an increasing incidence in industrialized countries. Treatment of TGCT is performed by an individual and risk-adapted approach taking primary tumor histology, histopathlogical and molecular prognostic risk factors, tumor stage and for metastasized tumors the response to systemic chemotherapy into consideration. Knowledge of the specific histopathology of the primary tumor and the prognostic factors is of utmost importance for the treating urologist and oncologist in order to avoid undertreatment or overtreatment. Established risk factors which have been validated in retrospective and prospective studies for clinical stage I non-seminomatous TGCT are the presence of vascular invasion and the percentage of embryonal carcinoma. In clinical stage I seminomas tumor size (> 4 cm) and presence of rete testis infiltration have been identified as risk factors in retrospective but not in prospective studies. Quantitative histopathology of the primary tumor is also important for the management of small residual masses following chemotherapy: if the masses are ≤ 1 cm, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is only indicated if the primary tumor contains ≥ 50 % teratoma. Quantitative pathohistology of the resected residual masses is of importance for the decision-making process of a consolidating chemotherapy which is only of benefit if the amount of vital cancer tissue is > 10 %. Resection of residual hepatic and thoracic masses is indispensable. For gonadal stromal tumors knowledge of atypical nuclear forms, increased rate of mitosis and increased growth fractions are important for therapy planning.

Organ-sparing surgery is the treatment of choice in benign testicular tumors

PURPOSE

Ablation of the testis has been the reference standard for malignant and benign testicular tumors in the past. Nowadays, an organ-sparing surgery (OSS) can be attempted in special cases. Removal of a testis for a benign lesion should be avoided. In this retrospective survey, we analyze the results and long-term follow-up of OSS in benign testicular tumors.

METHODS

Charts of all patients that underwent OSS because of a benign testicular tumor between 1999 and 2011 at our department were searched and the data from patients were collected. Before surgery, all patients underwent ultrasound (US) and complete staging. Surgery was performed under US or palpation guidance. Frozen-section examination of the tumor and tumor bed biopsies was obtained. All patients underwent postoperative follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed surgical technique, histology, epidemiology, and outcome in all patients.

RESULTS

In the study period, 40 benign testicular tumors were surgically removed in 37 consecutive patients. Definitive histology did not report of any malignant histopathologic features in all patients. All patients are free of disease after a mean follow-up of 63 months (range 10-120). During this period, two patients developed a second leydig cell tumor (LCT) on the contralateral side; another patient had a second LCT within the same testicle, but on the opposite pole. All patients underwent a subsequent organ-sparing tumor resection.

CONCLUSIONS

An overtreatment for benign testicular tumors should be avoided. Our initial results indicate that OSS in benign tumors is a safe, feasible treatment for patients.

[Focal surgery in testis cancer: current state of the art]

Radical orchiectomy is the standard treatment of testicular neoplasia causing androgen insufficiency, infertility and psychological stress. Focal surgery allows the preservation of fertility, endocrine function and integrity of the genital anatomy, with preservation of the image of the male body. The EAU guidelines suggest focal surgery in case of synchronous bilateral tumors, metachronous contralateral tumours, tumour in solitary testis with normal pre-operative testosterone levels, when the tumor volume less than 30% of the testicular volume. There are two focal surgical techniques: tumorectomy and polar resection, followed by biopsies and frozen section of the resection bed. In case of benign tumours, the treatment is often curative. In case of malignancy, carcinoma in situ is frequently found in the surrounding tissues. Adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy is performed with a fair success rate. These adjuvant treatments reduce or delete the functional benefits achieved by conservative surgery. The evidence of the literature suggests that focal surgery is a valid option for all patients with testicular tumours that are not palpable and small sized, with the advantage of avoiding unnecessary radical orchiectomy in most cases. Therefore, the selection criteria for focal surgery are the mass size (less than 25 mm) and a safety distance of the tumor from the rete testis, in order to preserve testicular vascularization. A close follow-up with ultrasound, testicular markers and radiological examinations is mandatory in case of germ cell neoplasia treated conservatively in patients with indications for conservative surgery.