Inhibin binding sites and proteins in pituitary, gonadal, adrenal and bone cells

TGFBR3L is an inhibin B co-receptor that regulates female fertility

Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), a key regulator of ovarian function, is often used in infertility treatment. Gonadal inhibins suppress FSH synthesis by pituitary gonadotrope cells. The TGFβ type III receptor, betaglycan, is required for inhibin A suppression of FSH. The inhibin B co-receptor was previously unknown. Here, we report that the gonadotrope-restricted transmembrane protein, TGFBR3L, is the elusive inhibin B co-receptor. TGFBR3L binds inhibin B but not other TGFβ family ligands. TGFBR3L knockdown or overexpression abrogates or confers inhibin B activity in cells. Female Tgfbr3l knockout mice exhibit increased FSH levels, ovarian follicle development, and litter sizes. In contrast, female mice lacking both TGFBR3L and betaglycan are infertile. TGFBR3L’s function and cell-specific expression make it an attractive new target for the regulation of FSH and fertility.

Betaglycan (TGFBR3) Functions as an Inhibin A, but Not Inhibin B, Coreceptor in Pituitary Gonadotrope Cells in Mice

Inhibins are gonadal hormones that act on pituitary gonadotrope cells to suppress FSH synthesis and secretion. Inhibin A and B are heterodimers of the inhibin ⍺-subunit disulfide-linked to one of two inhibin β-subunits. Homodimers or heterodimers of the inhibin β-subunits form the activins, which stimulate FSH production. Activins signal through complexes of type I and II receptor serine/threonine kinases to increase transcription of the FSHβ subunit gene. According to in vitro observations, inhibins impair FSH synthesis by competitively binding to activin type II receptors, particularly in the presence of the TGFβ type III receptor (TGFBR3, or betaglycan). The role of TGFBR3 in inhibin action in vivo has not been determined. Here, we ablated Tgfbr3 specifically in murine gonadotropes. Conditional knockout females were supra-fertile, exhibiting enhanced folliculogenesis, numbers of ovulated eggs per cycle, and litter sizes relative to control mice. Despite these phenotypes, FSH levels appeared to be unaltered in knockout mice, and the mechanisms underlying their enhanced fertility remain unexplained. Inhibin B is the predominant form of the hormone in males and in females during most stages of the estrous cycle. Remarkably, inhibin A, but not inhibin B, suppression of FSH synthesis was impaired in cultured pituitaries of knockout mice, which may explain the absence of discernible changes in FSH levels in vivo. Collectively, these data challenge current dogma by demonstrating that TGFBR3 (betaglycan) functions as an inhibin A, but not an inhibin B, coreceptor in gonadotrope cells in vivo. Mechanisms of inhibin B action merit further investigation.

Inhibin Is a Novel Paracrine Factor for Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis

Inhibin is a heterodimeric TGFβ family ligand that is expressed in many cancers and is a selective biomarker for ovarian cancers; however, its tumor-specific functions remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the α subunit of inhibin (INHA), which is critical for the functionality of dimeric inhibin A/B, correlates with microvessel density in human ovarian tissues and is predictive of poor clinical outcomes in multiple cancers. We demonstrate that inhibin-regulated angiogenesis is necessary for metastasis. Although inhibin had no direct impact on tumor cell signaling, both tumor cell-derived and recombinant inhibin elicit a strong paracrine response from endothelial cells by triggering SMAD1/5 activation and angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo Inhibin-induced angiogenesis was abrogated via anti-inhibin α antibodies. The endothelial-specific TGFβ receptor complex comprising ALK1 and endoglin was a crucial mediator of inhibin signaling, offering a molecular mechanism for inhibin-mediated angiogenesis. These results are the first to define a role for inhibin in tumor metastasis and vascularization and offer an antibody-based approach for targeting inhibin therapeutically.Significance: Inhibin is a predictor of poor patient survival in multiple cancers and is a potential target for antiangiogenic therapies. Cancer Res; 78(11); 2978-89. ©2018 AACR.

From Consternation to Revelation: Discovery of a Role for IGSF1 in Pituitary Control of Thyroid Function

Immunoglobulin superfamily, member 1 (IGSF1) is a transmembrane glycoprotein highly expressed in the mammalian pituitary gland. Shortly after its discovery in 1998, the protein was proposed to function as a coreceptor for inhibins (and was even temporarily renamed inhibin binding protein). However, subsequent investigations, both in vitro and in vivo, failed to support a role for IGSF1 in inhibin action. Research on IGSF1 nearly ground to a halt until 2011, when next-generation sequencing identified mutations in the X-linked IGSF1 gene in boys and men with congenital central hypothyroidism. IGSF1 was localized to thyrotrope cells, implicating the protein in pituitary control of the thyroid. Investigations in two Igsf1 knockout mouse models converged to show that IGSF1 deficiency leads to reduced expression of the receptor for thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and impaired TRH stimulation of thyrotropin secretion, providing a candidate mechanism for the central hypothyroidism observed in patients. Nevertheless, the normal functions of IGSF1 in thyrotropes and other cells remain unresolved. Moreover, IGSF1 mutations are also commonly associated with other clinical phenotypes, including prolactin and growth hormone dysregulation, and macroorchidism. How the loss of IGSF1 produces these characteristics is unknown. Although early studies of IGSF1 ran into roadblocks and blind alleys, armed with the results of detailed clinical investigations, powerful mouse models, and new reagents, the field is now poised to discover IGSF1’s function in endocrine tissues, including the pituitary and testes.

Endogenous inhibins regulate steroidogenesis in mouse TM3 Leydig cells by altering SMAD2 signalling

This study tested the hypothesis that inhibins act in an autocrine manner on Leydig cells using a pre-pubertal Leydig cell line, TM3, as a model of immature Leydig cells. The expression of Inha, Inhba, and Inhbb in TM3 cells was determined by RT-PCR and the production of the inhibin-alpha subunit was confirmed by western blot. Knockdown of Inha expression resulted in significant decreases in the expression of Leydig cell markers Cyp17a1, Cyp11a1, Nr5a1, and Insl3. Western blot showed that activin A, TGFβ1 and TGFβ2 activated SMAD2, and that knockdown of Inha expression in TM3 cells enhanced both activin A- and TGFβ-induced SMAD2 activation. SB431542, a chemical inhibitor of the TGFβ/activin type I receptors, blocked ligand-induced SMAD2 activation and the downregulation of Cyp17a1 expression. Our findings demonstrate that TGFβs and activin A negatively regulate steroidogenic gene expression in TM3 cells via ALK4/5 and SMAD2 and endogenous inhibins can counter this regulation.

RNAi-mediated knockdown of INHBB increases apoptosis and inhibits steroidogenesis in mouse granulosa cells

Inhibins are members of the TGFβ superfamily and act as suppressors of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion from pituitary glands via a negative feedback mechanism to regulate folliculogenesis. In this study, the INHBB gene was knocked down by three RNAi-Ready pSIREN-RetroQ-ZsGreen vector- mediated recombinant plasmids to explore the effects of INHBB silencing on granulosa cell (GC) cell cycle, apoptosis and steroid production in vitro. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, flow cytometry and ELISA were performed to evaluate the role of INHBB in the mouse GC cell cycle, apoptosis and steroid production in vitro. The results showed that the relative mRNA and protein expression of INHBB in mouse GCs can be significantly reduced by RNAi with pshRNA-B1, pshRNA-B2 and pshRNA-B3 plasmids, with pshRNA-B3 having the best knockdown efficiency. Downregulation of the expression of INHBB significantly arrests cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and increases the apoptosis rate in GCs. This was further confirmed by downregulation of the protein expressions of Cyclin D1, Cyclin E and Bcl2, while the protein expression of Bax was upregulated. In addition, specific downregulation of INHBB markedly decreased the concentration of estradiol and progesterone, which was further validated by the decrease in the mRNA levels of CYP19A1and CYP11A1. These findings suggest that inhibin βB is important in the regulation of apoptosis and cell cycle progression in granulosa cells. Furthermore, the inhibin βB subunit has a role in the regulation of steroid hormone biosynthesis. Evidence is accumulating to support the concept that inhibin βB is physiologically essential for early folliculogenesis in the mouse.

Inhibin at 90: from discovery to clinical application, a historical review

When it was initially discovered in 1923, inhibin was characterized as a hypophysiotropic hormone that acts on pituitary cells to regulate pituitary hormone secretion. Ninety years later, what we know about inhibin stretches far beyond its well-established capacity to inhibit activin signaling and suppress pituitary FSH production. Inhibin is one of the major reproductive hormones involved in the regulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis. Although the physiological role of inhibin as an activin antagonist in other organ systems is not as well defined as it is in the pituitary-gonadal axis, inhibin also modulates biological processes in other organs through paracrine, autocrine, and/or endocrine mechanisms. Inhibin and components of its signaling pathway are expressed in many organs. Diagnostically, inhibin is used for prenatal screening of Down syndrome as part of the quadruple test and as a biochemical marker in the assessment of ovarian reserve. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of our current understanding of the biological role of inhibin, its relationship with activin, its signaling mechanisms, and its potential value as a diagnostic marker for reproductive function and pregnancy-associated conditions.

New insights into the mechanisms of activin action and inhibition

Like other members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily, activins are synthesised as precursor molecules comprising an N-terminal prodomain and C-terminal mature region. During synthesis, the prodomain interacts non-covalently with mature activin, maintaining the molecule in a conformation competent for dimerisation. Dimeric precursors are cleaved by proprotein convertases and activin is secreted from the cell non-covalently associated with its propeptide. Extracellularly, the propeptide interacts with heparan sulfate proteoglycans to regulate activin localization within tissues. The mature activin dimer exhibits the classic 'open-hand' structure of TGF-β ligands with 'finger-like' domains projecting outward from the cysteine knot core of the molecule. These finger domains form the binding epitopes for type I and II serine/threonine kinase receptors. Activins ability to access its signalling receptors is regulated by the extracellular binding proteins, follistatin, follistatin-like-3, and by inhibins, which, in the presence of betaglycan, sequester type II receptors.

Cell-type specific modulation of pituitary cells by activin, inhibin and follistatin

Activins are multifunctional proteins and members of the TGF-β superfamily. Activins are expressed locally in most tissues and, analogous to the actions of other members of this large family of pleiotropic factors, play prominent roles in the regulation of diverse biological processes in both differentiated and embryonic stem cells. They have an essential role in maintaining tissue homeostasis in the adult and are known to contribute to the developmental programs in the embryo. Activins are further implicated in the growth and metastasis of tumor cells. Through distinct modes of action, inhibins and follistatins function as antagonists of activin and several other TGF-β family members, including a subset of BMPs/GDFs, and modulate cellular responses and the signaling cascades downstream of these ligands. In the pituitary, the activin pathway is known to regulate key aspects of gonadotrope functions and also exert effects on other pituitary cell types. As in other tissues, activin is produced locally by pituitary cells and acts locally by exerting cell-type specific actions on gonadotropes. These local actions of activin on gonadotropes are modulated by the autocrine/paracrine actions of locally secreted follistatin and by the feedback actions of gonadal inhibin. Knowledge about the mechanism of activin, inhibin and follistatin actions is providing information about their importance for pituitary function as well as their contribution to the pathophysiology of pituitary adenomas. The aim of this review is to highlight recent findings and summarize the evidence that supports the important functions of activin, inhibin and follistatin in the pituitary.

Expression of inhibin/activin proteins and receptors in the human hypothalamus and basal forebrain

The inhibin/activin family of proteins is known to have a broad distribution of synthesis and expression in many species, as well as a variety of functions in reproductive and other physiological systems. Yet, our knowledge regarding the production and function of inhibin and activin in the central nervous system is relatively limited, especially in humans. The present study aimed to explore the distribution of inhibin/activin protein subunits and receptors in the adult human brain. The human hypothalamus and surrounding basal forebrain was examined using post-mortem tissues from 29 adults. Immunocytochemical studies were conducted with antibodies directed against the inhibin/activin α, βA, and βB subunits, betaglycan and the activin type IIA and IIB receptors. An immunoassay was also utilised to measure dimeric inhibin A and B levels in tissue homogenates of the infundibulum of the hypothalamus. Robust βA subunit immunoreactivity was present in the paraventricular, supraoptic, lateral hypothalamic, infundibular, dorsomedial and suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus, in the basal ganglia, and in the nucleus basalis of Meynert. A similar staining distribution was noted for the βB subunit, betaglycan and the type II receptor antibodies, whereas α subunit staining was not detected in any of the major anatomical regions of the human brain. Inhibin B immunoreactivity was present in all tissues, whereas inhibin A levels were below detectable limits. These studies show for the first time that the inhibin/activin protein subunits and receptors can be co-localised in the human brain, implicating potential, diverse neural functions.

The Local Control of the Pituitary by Activin Signaling and Modulation

The pituitary gland plays a prominent role in the control of many physiological processes. This control is achieved through the actions and interactions of hormones and growth factors that are produced and secreted by the endocrine cell types and the non-endocrine constituents that collectively and functionally define this complex organ. The five endocrine cell types of the anterior lobe of the pituitary, somatotropes, lactotropes, corticotropes, thyrotropes and gonadotropes, are defined by their primary product, growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)/luteinizing hormone (LH). They are further distinguishable by the presence of cell surface receptors that display high affinity and selectivity for specific hypothalamic hormones and couple to appropriate downstream signaling pathways involved in the control of cell type specific responses, including the release and/or synthesis of pituitary hormones. Central control of the pituitary via the hypothalamus is further fine-tuned by the positive or negative actions of peripheral feedback signals and of a variety of factors that originate from sources within the pituitary. The focus of this review is the latter category of intrinsic factors that exert local control. Special emphasis is given to the TGF-β family of growth factors, in particular activin effects on the gonadotrope population, because a considerable body of evidence supports their contribution to the local modulation of the embryonic and postnatal pituitary as well as pituitary pathogenesis. A number of other substances, including members of the cytokine and FGF families, VEGF, IGF1, PACAP, Ghrelin, adenosine and nitric oxide have also been shown or implicated to function as autocrine/paracrine factors, though, definitive proof remains lacking in some cases. The ever-growing list of putative autocrine/paracrine factors of the pituitary nevertheless has highlighted the complexity of the local network and its impact on pituitary functions.

Endogenous betaglycan is essential for high-potency inhibin antagonism in gonadotropes

Inhibins are endocrine hormones that regulate gametogenesis and reproduction through a negative feedback loop with FSH. Inhibin action involves antagonism of signaling by activin or other TGFbeta family ligands. In transfection assays, antagonism by inhibin can be potentiated by betaglycan, a coreceptor for selected TGFbeta family ligands. We tested whether betaglycan is an obligate inhibin coreceptor through disruption of betaglycan function by RNA interference-mediated knockdown and immunoneutralization. Betaglycan knockdown and anti-betaglycan IgG each independently prevented inhibin-A binding to betaglycan and reversed functional effects of transfected betaglycan. Neither betaglycan immunoneutralization nor knockdown affected activin responsiveness in cell lines or in rat anterior pituitary cultures. Betaglycan knockdown decreased the potency of inhibin antagonism of activin-induced FSH secretion in primary gonadotropes. Similarly, anti-betaglycan IgG decreased the potency of inhibin antagonism in primary gonadotropes in a dose-dependent manner, with a reduction in the sensitivity to inhibin-A of greater than 1000-fold. These data establish that betaglycan is an endogenous inhibin coreceptor required for high-sensitivity inhibin antagonism of activin signaling in rat anterior pituitary gonadotropes.

A common biosynthetic pathway governs the dimerization and secretion of inhibin and related transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) ligands

The assembly and secretion of transforming growth factor beta superfamily ligands is dependent upon non-covalent interactions between their pro- and mature domains. Despite the importance of this interaction, little is known regarding the underlying regulatory mechanisms. In this study, the binding interface between the pro- and mature domains of the inhibin alpha-subunit was characterized using in vitro mutagenesis. Three hydrophobic residues near the N terminus of the prodomain (Leu(30), Phe(37), Leu(41)) were identified that, when mutated to alanine, disrupted heterodimer assembly and secretion. It is postulated that these residues mediate dimerization by interacting non-covalently with hydrophobic residues (Phe(271), Ile(280), Pro(283), Leu(338), and Val(340)) on the outer convex surface of the mature alpha-subunit. Homology modeling indicated that these mature residues are located at the interface between two beta-sheets of the alpha-subunit and that their side chains form a hydrophobic packing core. Mutation of these residues likely disturbs the conformation of this region, thereby disrupting non-covalent interactions with the prodomain. A similar hydrophobic interface was identified spanning the pro- and mature domains of the inhibin beta(A)-subunit. Mutation of key residues, including Ile(62), Leu(66), Phe(329), and Pro(341), across this interface was disruptive for the production of both inhibin A and activin A. In addition, mutation of Ile(62) and Leu(66) in the beta(A)-propeptide reduced its ability to bind, or inhibit the activity of, activin A. Conservation of the identified hydrophobic motifs in the pro- and mature domains of other transforming growth factor beta superfamily ligands suggests that we have identified a common biosynthetic pathway governing dimer assembly.

Transforming growth factor-beta blocks inhibin binding to different target cell types in a context-dependent manner through dual mechanisms involving betaglycan

Inhibin antagonizes activin and bone morphogenetic protein actions by sequestering their type II receptors in high-affinity complexes with betaglycan, a coreceptor that inhibin shares with TGF-beta. To clarify the nature and extent of interactions between inhibin and TGF-beta, we therefore examined 1) the mutual competition between these ligands for binding, 2) the regulation of endogenous betaglycan expression by inhibin and TGF-beta isoforms, and 3) the consequences of such betaglycan regulation for subsequent inhibin binding in mouse Leydig (TM3), Sertoli (TM4), adrenocortical cancer (AC), and gonadotroph (LbetaT2) cell lines, chosen to model cellular targets for local and endocrine actions of inhibin. Recognized inhibin, activin, and TGF-beta binding proteins and TGF-beta/activin signaling components were expressed by all four cell types, but AC and LbetaT2 cells notably lacked the type II receptor for TGF-beta, TbetaRII. Overnight treatment of TM3 and TM4 cells with TGF-beta1 suppressed the levels of betaglycan mRNA by 73 and 46% of control and subsequent [(125)I]inhibin A binding by 64 and 41% of control (IC(50) of 54 and 92 pm), respectively. TGF-beta2 acted similarly. TGF-beta pretreatments commensurately decreased the [(125)I]inhibin A affinity labeling of betaglycan on TM3 and TM4 cells. TGF-beta isoforms as direct competitors blocked up to 60% of specific inhibin A binding sites on TM3 and TM4 cells but with 9- to 17-fold lower potency than when acting indirectly via regulation of betaglycan. Only the competitive action of TGF-beta was observed with TbetaRII-deficient AC and LbetaT2 cells. Neither inhibin A nor inhibin B regulated betaglycan mRNA or competed for binding of [(125)I]TGF-beta1 or -beta2. Thus, inhibin binding to its target cell types is controlled by TGF-beta through dual mechanisms of antagonism, the operation of which vary with cell context and display different sensitivities to TGF-beta. In contrast, TGF-beta binding is relatively insensitive to the presence of either inhibin A or inhibin B.

Inhibin A and B in vitro bioactivities are modified by their degree of glycosylation and their affinities to betaglycan

Inhibin A and B, important regulators of normal function in tissues of the reproductive axis, are glycosylated at either Asn(268) or Asn(268) and Asn(302) in the alpha-subunit to produce 31- and 34-kDa isoforms, respectively. In this study, glycosylated isoforms of recombinant human inhibin A and B were purified from conditioned medium using immunoaffinity chromatography and reversed-phase HPLC. The masses of the purified inhibin preparations were determined by several inhibin immunoassays, and their in vitro bioactivities were based on suppression of FSH release by rat pituitary cells in culture. Based on a ratio of in vitro bioactivity to immunoactivity (B:I ratio), the monoglycosylated 31-kDa inhibin A was 5-fold more potent than the diglycosylated 34-kDa inhibin A (B:I ratio, 1.22 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.05; P < 0.001, respectively). The 31-kDa inhibin B was significantly (P < 0.001) more potent (1.75 +/- 0.29) than the 34-kDa form (1.08 +/- 0.20). Because inhibin biological activity is dependent upon interactions with the coreceptor betaglycan, the effect of inhibin glycosylation on betaglycan binding was assessed. Analogous to the pattern of in vitro bioactivity, 31-kDa inhibin A was 12-fold more active (IC(50), 0.68 nM) than the 34-kDa isoform (IC(50), 8.2 nM) at displacing [(125)I]inhibin A from COS7 cells expressing betaglycan. However, the 1.6-fold difference in bioactivity of the inhibin B isoforms was not matched by differences in their affinities for betaglycan. It is concluded that glycosylation of Asn(302) of the alpha-subunit of inhibin A and B results in a decrease in bioactivity, and the effect on inhibin A, at least, is explained by its reduced affinity to betaglycan.

Endocrine signaling in ovarian surface epithelium and cancer

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death among women in developed countries. Greater than 85% of human ovarian cancer arises within the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE), with the remainder derived from granulosa cells or, rarely, stroma or germ cells. The pathophysiology of ovarian cancer is the least understood among all major human malignancies because of a poor understanding of the aetiological factors and mechanisms of ovarian cancer progression. There is increasing evidence suggesting that several key reproductive hormones, such as GnRH, gonadotrophins and sex steroids, regulate the growth of normal OSE and ovarian cancer cells. The objective of this review was to highlight the effects of these endocrine factors on ovarian cancer cell growth and to summarize the signalling mechanisms involved in normal human OSE and its neoplastic counterparts.

On allosteric control model of bone turnover cycle containing osteocyte regulation loop

One approach to developing a mathematical model that predicts osteoactivity both in bio-scaffolds, as well as the in bone tissue in vivo, is based on a bio-cybernetic vision of basic multicellular unit (BMU) action. In the case of the model presented in this paper, some of the loops of regulation have been modified to reflect the range of allosteric control mechanisms: Michaelis-Menten, Hill, Adair, Koshland-Nemethy-Filmer (KNF), Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC). This approach has resulted in a four-dimensional system that shows steady cyclic behaviour using a range of constants with clear biological meaning. The initial findings suggesting that a steady state appears as a cycle in multidimensional phase space and this is discussed in this paper. The existence of this cycle in the osteoclasts-osteoblasts-osteocytes-bone subspace indicates that there is a conservative value along steady trajectories for this dynamic system. Biophysical interpretation of this conservative value has been proposed as a kind of substrate-energy regenerative potential of the bone remodelling system with a similarity to the classical physical value-energy. Such a recovery "potential" is directed against both mechanical and biomechanical damage to the bone. The current model has credibility when compared to the normal bone remodelling process. In the framework of widely recognised Michaelis-Menten mechanisms of allosteric regulation the cyclic attractor, described formerly for a pure cellular model, prevails for different forms of feedback control. This finding demonstrates the viability of the suggestion of the subsistence of conservative value (analogous to energy) that characterises the recovery potential of the bone remodelling cycle. The results indicate that the robust behaviour of the model is maintained from the simple cellular level to the molecular biochemical level of regulation.

Pituitary cell lines and their endocrine applications

The pituitary gland is an important component of the endocrine system, and together with the hypothalamus, exerts considerable influence over the functions of other endocrine glands. The hypothalamus either positively or negatively regulates hormonal productions in the pituitary through its release of various trophic hormones which act on specific cell types in the pituitary to secrete a variety of pituitary hormones that are important for growth and development, metabolism, reproductive and nervous system functions. The pituitary is divided into three sections-the anterior lobe which constitute the majority of the pituitary mass and is composed primarily of five hormone-producing cell types (thyrotropes, lactotropes, corticotropes, somatotropes and gonadotropes) each secreting thyrotropin, prolactin, ACTH, growth hormone and gonadotropins (FSH and LH) respectively. There is also a sixth cell type in the anterior lobe-the non-endocrine, agranular, folliculostellate cells. The intermediate lobe produces melanocyte-stimulating hormone and endorphins, whereas the posterior lobe secretes anti-diuretic hormone (vasopressin) and oxytocin. Representative cell lines of all the six cell types of the anterior pituitary have been established and have provided valuable information on genealogy of the various cell lineages, endocrine feedback control of hormone synthesis and secretions, intrapituitary interactions between the various cell types, as well as the role of specific transcription factors that determine each differentiated cell phenotype. In this review, we will discuss the morphology and function of the cell types that make up the anterior pituitary, and the characteristics of the various functional anterior pituitary cell systems that have been established to be representative of each anterior pituitary cell lineage.

Normal reproductive function in InhBP/p120-deficient mice

The inhibins are gonadal transforming growth factor beta superfamily protein hormones that suppress pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) synthesis. Recently, betaglycan and inhibin binding protein (InhBP/p120, also known as the product of immunoglobulin superfamily gene 1 [IGSF1]) were identified as candidate inhibin coreceptors, shedding light on the molecular basis of how inhibins may affect target cells. Activins, which are structurally related to the inhibins, act within the pituitary to stimulate FSH production. Betaglycan increases the affinity of inhibins for the activin type IIA (ACVR2) receptor, thereby blocking activin binding and signaling through this receptor. InhBP/p120 may not directly bind inhibins but may interact with the activin type IB receptor, ALK4, and participate in inhibin B's antagonism of activin signaling. To better understand the in vivo functions of InhBP/p120, we characterized the InhBP/p120 mRNAs and gene in mice and generated InhBP/p120 mutant mice by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. InhBP/p120 mutant male and female mice were viable and fertile. Moreover, they showed no alterations in FSH synthesis or secretion or in ovarian or testicular function. These data contribute to a growing body of evidence indicating that InhBP/p120 does not play an essential role in inhibin biology.

Properties of inhibin binding to betaglycan, InhBP/p120 and the activin type II receptors

Activin-stimulated FSH synthesis and release by the pituitary gonadotrope is antagonized by gonadally derived inhibins. The two isoforms of inhibin, inhibin A and B, bind to the activin type II receptors, though at a lower affinity than the activins, but do not stimulate intracellular signaling. Theoretically, therefore, inhibins can prevent activin signaling through competitive binding if present at higher concentrations than the activins. In reality, the inhibins have been shown to antagonize activin signaling when the two ligand types are present at equimolar concentrations. These observations led to the hypothesis that inhibin binding proteins or co-receptors exist that either increase the affinity of the inhibins for the activin receptors or propagate inhibin-specific intracellular signals. Two candidate inhibin co-receptors, betaglycan and InhBP/p120, interact with activin receptors and augment inhibin antagonism of activin action. Here, we report the effect of betaglycan and InhBP/p120 on both inhibin A and inhibin B binding to the activin receptors ActRIIA and ActRIIB2. InhBP/p120 did not bind inhibin A or B when expressed alone or in combination with activin receptors, requiring a re-examination of the role of this protein in inhibin biology. Both inhibins bound the activin type II receptor, ActRIIB2. Inhibin B had a higher affinity for this receptor than inhibin A but an approximately 10-fold lower affinity than that of activin A. Inhibin A and B bound betaglycan with high affinity; however, only inhibin A binding to ActRIIB2 was significantly enhanced in the presence of betaglycan. Both inhibin isoforms showed slight but significant binding to ActRIIA, yet this binding was potentiated in the presence of betaglycan. Additionally, the complex formed between the inhibins, ActRIIA, and betaglycan was resistant to disruption by activin A, whereas activin A potently competed for inhibin binding to ActRIIB2 and betaglycan. Collectively, these data show that the inhibin isoforms have different affinities for the activin type II receptors but bind betaglycan with high affinity. A recently developed model of inhibin action proposes that inhibins form a high affinity, activin-resistant ternary complex with activin type II receptors and betaglycan, thereby providing a mechanism for inhibin antagonism of activin signaling. Importantly, the results presented here clearly show that this model does not apply equally to both forms of inhibin nor to the different activin type II receptor isoforms. Thus, it appears that the mechanisms of inhibin action may vary depending on the ligand and receptor types involved.

Expression of activin/inhibin receptor and binding protein genes and regulation of activin/inhibin peptide secretion in human adrenocortical cells

Activins and inhibins are glycoprotein hormones produced mainly in gonads but also in other organs. They are believed to be important para/autocrine regulators of various cell functions. We investigated activin/inhibin receptor and binding protein gene expression and the regulation of activin/inhibin secretion in human adrenal cells. RT-PCR revealed inhibin/activin alpha-, betaA/B-subunit, follistatin, activin type I/II receptor, and inhibin receptor (betaglycan and inhibin-binding protein) mRNA expression in fetal and adult adrenals and cultured adrenocortical cells. Cultured cells secreted activin A and inhibin A/B as determined by specific ELISAs. ACTH stimulated inhibin A/B secretion in fetal (1.8- and 1.8-fold of control, respectively) and in adult cells (3.4- and 1.7-fold of control, respectively) without significant effect on activin A. 8-bromoadenosine cAMP (protein kinase A activator) increased activin A and inhibin A/B secretion in the human adrenocortical NCI-H295R cell line (32-, 17-, and 3-fold of control, respectively). 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (protein kinase C activator) stimulated both activin A and inhibin A secretion (764- and 32-fold of control, respectively), and activin treatment increased inhibin B secretion in these cells (25-fold of control). In conclusion, human adrenocortical cells produce dimeric activins and inhibins. ACTH stimulates inhibin secretion and decreases activin/inhibin secretion ratio, probably via the protein kinase A signal transduction pathway. This, together with the adrenocortical activin/ inhibin receptor and binding protein expression, suggests a physiological role for activins and inhibins in the human adrenal gland.

Inhibin binding protein (InhBP/p120), betaglycan, and the continuing search for the inhibin receptor

Betaglycan (the TGFbeta type III receptor) and InhBP/p120 (a membrane-tethered proteoglycan) were recently identified as putative inhibin receptors. Here, we review the current state of knowledge regarding these two proteins with respect to their potential roles in inhibin biology. Importantly, neither protein appears to satisfy all of the criteria required for classification as a bona fide inhibin receptor. Betaglycan does not appear to be expressed in pituitary gonadotropes, the primary target of circulating inhibins, and InhBP/p120 does not bind inhibins in conventional receptor binding assays. While both proteins appear capable of promoting inhibin-mediated antagonism of activin signaling, neither appears to generate inhibin-specific intracellular signals. Recently, additional inhibin binding proteins were identified in inhibin target tissues, including pituitary and Leydig cells. Characterization of these proteins, coupled with ongoing investigations of betaglycan and InhBP/p120, will lead to a clearer understanding of mechanisms of inhibin action.