Evidence for an important functional role of intracellular loop II of the lutropin receptor

Role of the Extracellular and Intracellular Loops of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Its Function

Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) is a leucine-rich repeat containing class A G-protein coupled receptor belonging to the subfamily of glycoprotein hormone receptors (GPHRs), which includes luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LH/CGR) and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor. Its cognate ligand, follicle-stimulating hormone binds to, and activates FSHR expressed on the surface of granulosa cells of the ovary, in females, and Sertoli cells of the testis, in males, to bring about folliculogenesis and spermatogenesis, respectively. FSHR contains a large extracellular domain (ECD) consisting of leucine-rich repeats at the N-terminal end and a hinge region at the C-terminus that connects the ECD to the membrane spanning transmembrane domain (TMD). The TMD consists of seven α-helices that are connected to each other by means of three extracellular loops (ELs) and three intracellular loops (ILs) and ends in a short-cytoplasmic tail. It is well established that the ECD is the primary hormone binding domain, whereas the TMD is the signal transducing domain. However, several studies on the ELs and ILs employing site directed mutagenesis, generation of chimeric receptors and in vitro characterization of naturally occurring mutations have proven their indispensable role in FSHR function. Their role in every phase of the life cycle of the receptor like post translational modifications, cell surface trafficking, hormone binding, activation of downstream signaling, receptor phosphorylation, hormone-receptor internalization, and recycling of hormone-receptor complex have been documented. Mutations in the loops causing dysregulation of these processes lead to pathophysiological conditions. In other GPHRs as well, the loops have been convincingly shown to contribute to various aspects of receptor function. This review article attempts to summarize the extensive contributions of FSHR loops and C-terminal tail to its function.

Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions

BACKGROUND

The details of the functional interaction between G proteins and the G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been subjected to extensive investigations with structural and functional assays and a large number of computational studies.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

The nature and sites of interaction in the G-protein/GPCR complexes, and the specificities of these interactions selecting coupling partners among the large number of families of GPCRs and G protein forms, are still poorly defined.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

Many of the contact sites between the two proteins in specific complexes have been identified, but the three dimensional molecular architecture of a receptor-Gα interface is only known for one pair. Consequently, many fundamental questions regarding this macromolecular assembly and its mechanism remain unanswered.

GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE

In the context of current structural data we review the structural details of the interfaces and recognition sites in complexes of sub-family A GPCRs with cognate G-proteins, with special emphasis on the consequences of activation on GPCR structure, the prevalence of preassembled GPCR/G-protein complexes, the key structural determinants for selective coupling and the possible involvement of GPCR oligomerization in this process.

The second intracellular loop of the human cannabinoid CB2 receptor governs G protein coupling in coordination with the carboxyl terminal domain

The major effects of cannabinoids and endocannabinoids are mediated via two G protein-coupled receptors, CB1 and CB2, elucidation of the mechanism and structural determinants of the CB2 receptor coupling with G proteins will have a significant impact on drug discovery. In the present study, we systematically investigated the role of the intracellular loops in the interaction of the CB2 receptor with G proteins using chimeric receptors alongside the characterization of cAMP accumulation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. We provided evidence that ICL2 was significantly involved in G protein coupling in coordination with the C-terminal end. Moreover, a single alanine substitution of the Pro-139 in the CB2 receptor that corresponds to Leu-222 in the CB1 receptor resulted in a moderate impairment in the inhibition of cAMP accumulation, whereas mutants P139F, P139M and P139L were able to couple to the Gs protein in a CRE-driven luciferase assay. With the ERK activation experiments, we further found that P139L has the ability to activate ERK through both Gi- and Gs-mediated pathways. Our findings defined an essential role of the second intracellular loop of the CB2 receptor in coordination with the C-terminal tail in G protein coupling and receptor activation.

Principles and determinants of G-protein coupling by the rhodopsin-like thyrotropin receptor

In this study we wanted to gain insights into selectivity mechanisms between G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and different subtypes of G-proteins. The thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) binds G-proteins promiscuously and activates both Gs (cAMP) and Gq (IP). Our goal was to dissect selectivity patterns for both pathways in the intracellular region of this receptor. We were particularly interested in the participation of poorly investigated receptor parts.

We systematically investigated the amino acids of intracellular loop (ICL) 1 and helix 8 using site-directed mutagenesis alongside characterization of cAMP and IP accumulation. This approach was guided by a homology model of activated TSHR in complex with heterotrimeric Gq, using the X-ray structure of opsin with a bound G-protein peptide as a structural template.

We provide evidence that ICL1 is significantly involved in G-protein activation and our model suggests potential interactions with subunits Gα as well as Gβγ. Several amino acid substitutions impaired both IP and cAMP accumulation. Moreover, we found a few residues in ICL1 (L440, T441, H443) and helix 8 (R687) that are sensitive for Gq but not for Gs activation. Conversely, not even one residue was found that selectively affects cAMP accumulation only.

Together with our previous mutagenesis data on ICL2 and ICL3 we provide here the first systematically completed map of potential interfaces between TSHR and heterotrimeric G-protein. The TSHR/Gq-heterotrimer complex is characterized by more selective interactions than the TSHR/Gs complex. In fact the receptor interface for binding Gs is a subset of that for Gq and we postulate that this may be true for other GPCRs coupling these G-proteins. Our findings support that G-protein coupling and preference is dominated by specific structural features at the intracellular region of the activated GPCR but is completed by additional complementary recognition patterns between receptor and G-protein subtypes.

Contributions of intracellular loops 2 and 3 of the lutropin receptor in Gs coupling

A number of amino acids essential for Gs coupling, i.e. hot spots, were identified after in vitro Ala-scanning mutagenesis of the cytosolic extensions of helices 3, 5, and 6 and of intracellular loops 2 and 3 (IL2 and IL3) of the human LH receptor (LHR). Consistent with the results of in vitro experiments involving ligand binding and ligand-mediated signaling in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells, computational modeling of the isolated receptor and of the receptor-G protein complexes suggests an important role of the cytosolic extension of helix 3 and the N-terminal portion of the IL2 in Gs(alpha) interaction, whereas the contribution of IL3 is marginal. Mapping the hot spots into the computational models of LHR and the LHR-Gs complexes allowed for a distinction between receptor sites required for intramolecular structural changes (i.e. I460, T461, H466, and I549) and receptor sites more likely involved in G protein recognition (i.e. R464, T467, I468, Y470, Y550, and D564). The latter sites include the highly conserved arginine of the (E/D)R(Y/W) motif, which is therefore likely to be a receptor recognition point for Gs rather than a switch of receptor activation. The results of in vitro and in silico experiments carried out in this study represent the first comprehensive delineation of functionality of the individual residues in the intracellular domains of LHR and establish potential switches of receptor activation as well as a map of the primary receptor recognition sites for Gs. A novel way to consider constitutively active mutants was inferred from this study, i.e. receptor states with improved complementarity for the G protein compared to the wild-type receptor.

A functional transmembrane complex: the luteinizing hormone receptor with bound ligand and G protein

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is one of eight members in a cluster of the rhodopsin family of the large G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily that contains some 800-900 genes in the human genome. LHR, along with its paralogons, follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor, form one of the three classes in this cluster; the two other classes contain the relaxin-binding GPCRs and orphan GPCRs. These GPCRs are characterized by a relatively large ectodomain (ECD) containing leucine-rich-repeats (LRRs); in the class of glycoprotein hormone receptors, the LRR region is capped by N-terminal and C-terminal cysteine-rich regions. Binding of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or luteinizing hormone to the LHR-ECD triggers a conformational change of the transmembrane region of the receptor facilitating binding and activation of Gs, followed by effector enzyme activation and subsequent intracellular signaling. Viewing LHR as a transmembrane anchoring protein that sequentially binds hCG and Gs to give the hCG-LHR-Gs complex, numerous interactions and conformational changes must be considered. There is, unfortunately, a paucity of structural data on LHR, but crystal structures exist for hCG, the homologous FSH-FSHR-ECD (N-terminal fragment) complex, rhodopsin (in the inactive state), an active form of Galphas (transducin), and the betagamma heterodimer. Using a combined experimental (site-directed mutagenesis followed by characterization in transfected cells) and computational (homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations) approach, good working models are being developed for the protein-protein interaction faces and, in some cases, the ensuing conformational changes induced by complex formation. hCG binding to the LHR-ECD appears to involve several LRRs; LHR activation can be described in terms of disrupting a network of H-bonds in the cytosolic halves of helices 1-3, 6, and 7; and binding of LHR to Gs involves, in large part, intracellular loop 2 binding, presumably to Gsalpha at its C-terminus. Major gaps exist in our understanding at the molecular level of the six-polypeptide chain complex, hCG-LHR-Gs, but considerable progress has been made in the past few years.

Structure-function relationships of the luteinizing hormone receptor

Of the 800-900 genes in the human genome that appear to encode G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), two are known to encode receptors that bind the three heterodimeric human gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH), chorionic gonadotropin (CG), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). LH and CG bind to a common receptor, LHR, and FSH binds to a paralogous receptor. These GPCRs contain a relatively large ectodomain (ECD), responsible for high-affinity ligand binding, and a transmembrane portion, as in the other GPCRs. The ECD contains nine leucine-rich repeats capped by N-terminal and C-terminal cysteine-rich regions. The overall goal of this research is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which CG and LH bind to and activate LHR and the latter, in turn, activates Gs alpha. A combination of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis, coupled with binding and signaling studies in transiently transfected HEK 293 cells expressing wild-type and mutant forms of LHR, has been used to develop and test models for the LHR ECD, the CG-LHR ECD complex, and the structural changes in the transmembrane helices and intracellular loops, particularly loop 2, that accompany receptor activation. In addition, a single-chain CG-LHR complex was designed in which a fusion protein of the two subunits of human CG was linked to full-length LHR. This ligand-receptor complex was shown to be constitutively active in cellular models and in transgenic mice, the latter of which exhibit precocious puberty. From a combination of molecular modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, genetic/protein engineering, and receptor characterization in cellular and animal models, considerable insight is being developed on the mechanisms of normal and aberrant activation of LHR.

Structural determinants for g protein activation and selectivity in the second intracellular loop of the thyrotropin receptor

The TSH receptor (TSHR) activates mainly two signal transduction pathways, cAMP production and phosphoinositide turnover, mediated by Gs and Gq coupling, respectively. Several activating deletion and point mutations within intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) and the adjacent portion of transmembrane domain 6 (TM6) support a direct G protein activation by this receptor domain. The ICL3, however, is predicted by modeling to interact with other receptor domains, primarily ICL2, to form a pocket for G protein binding and to allow optimum interaction. Systematic mutagenesis was used to identify important sites within ICL2 and potential interactions between ICL2 and ICL3 of the TSHR required for G protein coupling. Deletions of four or five residues and their corresponding multiple alanine substitutions were introduced into ICL2. Residues I523-D530, comprising mainly the N-terminal half of ICL2, appeared to be critical for Gs- and Gq-mediated signaling. A single alanine substitution screening within ICL2 revealed hydrophobic residue M527 in particular and, to lesser extents, F525, R528, L529, and D530 as residues that selectively abolished or strongly impaired Gq activation. Molecular modeling suggests that F525 interacts with ICL3. To test this hypothesis, ICL2/ICL3 double mutants introducing strong complementary properties were constructed and tested for functional rescue of Gq-mediated signaling. Our results indicate that ICL2 interacts with ICL3 in close vicinity to F525 and T607, suggesting a conformational cooperation between ICL2 and ICL3 during Gq activation by TSHR.

Functional significance of the BBXXB motif reversed present in the cytoplasmic domains of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

The minimal structural motif, BBXXB (where B represents a basic amino acid residue and X a non-basic residue), located in particular regions of the intracellular domains of cell surface membrane receptors is involved in the G protein-activating activity of a number of G protein-coupled receptors. The human FSH receptor (hFSHR) exhibits a reversed BBXXB motif (BXXBB) in the juxtamembrane region of the third intracellular loop (IL3) and the carboxyl terminus (Ctail) of the receptor; however the importance of this sequence on receptor function remains unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the effects of mutations in this structural motif on hFSHR expression, receptor-mediated effector activation and agonist-provoked receptor internalization. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids containing the cDNA of the wild-type (Wt) hFSHR or several hFSHR mutants in which basic amino acids of the minimal structural motif at the IL3 and Ctail were replaced with alanine (i.e. AXXAA, AXXBB, BXXAB and BXXBA mutants). Alanine substitution of the three basic residues present in the IL3-BXXBB (IL3-AXXAA mutant) yielded a < or =60 kDa possibly under-glycosylated form of the FSHR, whereas the same substitutions in the Ctail resulted in the immature >62 kDa form of the receptor; both AXXAA hFSHR mutants completely failed to bind agonist and activate effector. Individual substitutions resulted in different cAMP responses to agonist stimulation: the IL3-AXXBB and IL3-BXXBA mutant hFSHRs failed to evoke Gs protein activation, whereas agonist-stimulated cAMP production was completely normal when the IL3-BXXAB mutant was expressed. All three IL3 mutants bound [125I]-labelled FSH in a similar fashion to the Wt hFSHR. Ligand-binding, cell surface membrane receptor expression and agonist-provoked effector activation were significantly affected by the individual substitutions at the Ctail-BXXBB motif: the Ctail-AXXBB variant exhibited reduced (approximately 50%) maximal cAMP response and ability to bind ligand, whereas both ligand binding and effector activation was severely reduced or abolished by expression of the Ctail-BXXBA and -BXXAB hFSHR mutants; the expression levels of the 80 kDa form of the receptor correlated with the magnitude of ligand-provoked cAMP production and binding capability of the mutant receptors. Upon stimulation by agonist, all mutants with detectable ligand-binding activity internalized following the pattern exhibited by the Wt hFSHR species. These results indicate that the BXXBB motif at the IL3 of the hFSHR is essential for coupling the activated receptor to the Gs protein, whereas the same motif in the Ctail is apparently more important for membrane expression.

Structural determinants in the second intracellular loop of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor are involved in G(s) protein activation

In the present study, we analyzed the structural determinants present in the second intracellular loop (IL-2) of the human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor (R) involved in G(s) protein-mediated signal transduction. Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells, stably expressing wild-type (Wt) human FSHR (HEK-293((+))), were transiently transfected with plasmids containing cDNAs encoding the entire IL-2 or several IL-2 sequences mutated in R467 (a residue located at the center of the conserved ERW motif in the glycoprotein hormone receptors), T470 (a potential site for phosphorylation by protein kinase-A and -C) or L477 (a residue conserved in all glycoprotein hormone receptors). Expression of the IL-2 Wt in HEK-293((+)) cells reduced the maximum FSH-stimulated cAMP production significantly by approximately 40%; similar results were observed with the R467A and R467K IL-2 mutants. The IL-2(R467H), IL-2(T470A), the triple R467A/T470A/L477A IL-2 mutant and the IL-2 of the oxytocin receptor (G(q/11)-coupled) had no effects on Wt FSHR-mediated intracellular signaling whereas the L477A mutation provoked a higher ( approximately 55%) inhibition of FSH-stimulated cAMP than the free, Wt IL-2. These results suggested a specific role of IL-2 residues in FSHR function. Site directed mutagenesis of the FSHR and the expression of resulting mutants in HEK-293 cells were performed in order to corroborate the effects of these substitutions. Expression of FSHR(R467H), FSHR(R467A) and FSHR(T470A) failed to mediate ligand-provoked G(s) protein activation, whereas the R467K mutant behaved as the Wt receptor. Interestingly, the expression of L477A, L477D and L477P FSHR mutants conferred elevated basal cAMP levels to HEK-293 cells. This study indicates that the IL-2 of the human FSHR possesses amino acid residues that are important for both coupling the receptor to the G(s) protein (R467 and T470) and maintaining the receptor molecule in an inactive conformation (L477). It appears that this particular intracellular domain may act as a conformational switch to produce the activation of G proteins as has been reported for the IL-2 of other G protein-coupled receptors.

Histamine H2 receptor mediated dual signaling: mapping of structural requirements using beta2 adrenergic chimeric receptors

Previously we demonstrated that the histamine H2 receptor can activate both the adenylate cyclase and phosphoinositide/protein kinase (PKC) signaling pathways. Although dual coupling occurs via separate GTP-dependent mechanisms the structural components of the H2 receptor directing differential signaling have not been established. We explored this question by attempting to confer to the beta2-adrenergic receptor (betaAR), which is known to stimulate cAMP formation, the ability to activate PKC through the construction of beta2/H2 chimeric receptors. Intracytoplasmic domains of the human beta2 adrenergic receptor were substituted with the corresponding sequences of the human H2 receptor and stably expressed in HEK-293 cells. Binding of [(3)H]-CGP to chimeric wild type beta2 receptors was comparable. Substitution of the second intracellular loop (2i) of the betaAR led to a significant decrease in coupling to adenylate cyclase while leading to a 139.5 +/- 9.4% control increase in epinephrine mediated PKC activation. Introduction of the H2 receptor 3i also led to a decrease in betaAR mediated cAMP generation but provided the latter with the ability to stimulate PKC (182.2 +/- 8% of control). Concomitant expression of both 2i and 3i led to a substantial increase in epinephrine mediated PKC activation (201.8 +/- 10.5% of control). Addition of the carboxyl terminal tail did not facilitate stimulation of PKC. In summary, the third intracellular loop of the H2 receptor plays an essential role in activating PKC with maximal efficiency conferred by the second intracellular domain.

Human follicle stimulating hormone receptor trafficking and hormone binding sites in the amino terminus

Previous studies of the rat follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (rFSHR) demonstrated that the amino terminus is important in FSH binding and signal transduction. To define the structure-function correlates of this region, we prepared deletion and alanine scanning mutants of amino acids (a.a.) 9-30 in human FSHR (hFSHR). The deletion mutants DeltaS9-S18, DeltaK19-N30 and DeltaS9-N30 failed to bind 125I-hFSH. Alanine substitution in the mutants 2HHRI(5)/2AAAA(5), 7HCSNR(11)/7ACAAA(11), 16QES(18)/16AAA(18) and 19KVT(21)/19AAA(21) increased the affinity of hFSHR for hFSH with equilibrium dissociation constants two to fivefold lower than wild type (wt) values. Signal transduction in 2HHRI(5)/2AAAA(5) and 19KVT(21)/19AAA(21) was similar to wt values, whereas 7HCSNR(11)/7ACAAA(11) and 16QES(18)/16AAA(18) showed a twofold lower accumulation of cAMP in response to hFSH than wt. These results indicate that these regions play a role in hormone binding and signal transduction. In contrast, cells infected with mutants 12VFL(14)/12AAA(14), 22EIPS(25)/22AAPA(25) and 26DLPRN(30)/26AAPAA(30) were incapable of binding 125I-hFSH even when solubilized with nonionic detergent. Flow cytometry indicated that hFSHR in 12VFL(14)/12AAA(14), 22EIPS(25)/22AAPA(25) and 26DLPRN(30)/26AAPAA(30) was not present on the cell surface although the protein was expressed at high levels as determined by Western blotting. These results suggest that a discontinuous epitope in the N-terminus, likely stabilized by disulfide bonds and outside of the leucine-rich repeat domains, constitutes a hormone binding site, membrane localization signal or both.

Role of the third intracellular loop for the activation of gonadotropin receptors

Hyperfunctional endocrine thyroid and testicular disorders can frequently be traced back to gainof-function mutations in glycoprotein hormone receptor genes. Deletion mutations in the third intracellular (i3) loop of the TSH receptor have recently been identified as a cause of constitutive receptor activity. To examine whether the underlying mechanism of receptor activation applies to all glycoprotein hormone receptors, we created deletion mutations in the LH and FSH receptors. In analogy to the situation with the TSH receptor, a deletion of nine amino acids resulted in constitutive activity irrespective of the location of deletions within the i3 loop of the LH receptor. In contrast, only one (delta563-566) of four different 4-amino acid deletion mutants displayed agonist-independent activity. Systematic examination of the structural requirements for this effect in the delta563-566 mutant revealed that only deletions including D564 resulted in constitutive receptor activity. Replacement of D564 by G, K, and N led to agonist-independent cAMP formation while introduction of a negatively charged E silenced constitutive receptor activity, indicating that an anionic amino acid at this position may be required to maintain an inactive receptor conformation. Insertion of A residues up- and downstream of D564 did not perturb receptor quiescence, showing that a certain degree of spatial freedom of the negatively charged amino acid within the context of the i3 loop is well tolerated. In contrast to the results obtained with the LH receptor, deletion of the corresponding D567 from the i3 loop of the FSH receptor did not cause constitutive receptor activation, highlighting significant differences in the activation mechanism of gonadotropin receptors.