Ability of the glucocorticoid modulatory element to modify glucocorticoid receptor transactivation indicates parallel pathways for the expression of glucocorticoid modulatory element and glucocorticoid response element activities

GMEB2 Promotes the Growth of Colorectal Cancer by Activating ADRM1 Transcription and NF-κB Signalling and Is Positively Regulated by the m6A Reader YTHDF1

Transcription factors are frequently aberrantly reactivated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, as a transcription factor, the role of GMEB2 in cancer is still unclear, and further studies are needed. Here, we aimed to identify the function and mechanism of GMEB2 in regulating the malignant progression of CRC. GMEB2 was found to be highly expressed in online data analyses. We demonstrated that GMEB2 was markedly upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in CRC cells and tissues. GMEB2 knockdown inhibited CRC cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, as a transcription factor, GMEB2 transactivated the ADRM1 promoter to increase its transcription. Rescue experiments showed that ADRM1 downregulation partially reversed the promoting effects of GMEB2 on CRC growth in vitro. Moreover, the GMEB2/ADRM1 axis induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB, thus activating NF-κB signalling. Finally, we further revealed that YTHDF1 recognized and bound to the m⁶A site on GMEB2 mRNA, which enhanced its stability. Taken together, our findings reveal the crucial role and regulatory mechanism of GMEB2 in CRC for the first time and provide a novel potential therapeutic target for CRC therapy.

Differential modulation of glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor transactivation

The determinants of the different biological activities of progesterone receptors (PRs) vs. glucocorticoid receptors (GRs), which bind to the same DNA sequences, remain poorly understood. The mechanisms by which differential expression of a common target gene can be achieved by PR and GR include unequal agonist steroid concentrations for half maximal induction (EC50) and dissimilar amounts of residual partial agonist activity for antisteroids in addition to the more common changes in total gene induction, or Vmax. Several factors are known to alter some or all of these three parameters for GR-regulated gene induction and some (i.e., the corepressors NCoR and SMRT) modulate the EC50 and partial agonist activity for GR and PR induction of the same gene in opposite directions. The current study demonstrates that other factors known to modulate GR properties (GME, GMEB-2, Ubc9, and STAMP) can also differentially interact with PRs or alter several of the above induction parameters under otherwise identical conditions. These results support the hypothesis that the modulation of EC50, partial agonist activity, and Vmax by a given factor is not limited to one receptor in a specific cell line. Furthermore, the number of factors that unequally modulate PR and GR induction parameters is now greatly expanded, thereby increasing the possible mechanisms for differential gene regulation by PRs vs. GRs.

STAMP, a novel predicted factor assisting TIF2 actions in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated induction and repression

The coactivator TIF2 was predicted to interact with an unknown factor to modify both the relative inhibition in glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-mediated gene repression and several parameters of agonists and antisteroids in GR-regulated induction. Here, we describe the isolation and characterization of the predicted factor as a new 1,277-amino-acid endogenous protein (STAMP). STAMP associates with coactivators (TIF2 and SRC-1) and is selective for a subset of the steroid/nuclear receptors including GRs. Transfected STAMP increases the effects of TIF2 in GR-mediated repression and induction. Conversely, the levels of both induction and repression of endogenous genes are reduced when STAMP small interfering RNAs are used to lower the level of endogenous STAMP. Endogenous STAMP colocalizes with GR in intact cells and is recruited to the promoters of endogenous GR-induced and -repressed genes. We suggest that STAMP is an important new, downstream component of GR action in both gene activation and gene repression.

Effects of acetylation, polymerase phosphorylation, and DNA unwinding in glucocorticoid receptor transactivation

Varying the concentration of selected factors alters the induction properties of steroid receptors by changing the position of the dose-response curve (or the value for half-maximal induction=EC(50)) and the amount of partial agonist activity of antisteroids. We now describe a rudimentary mathematical model that predicts a simple Michaelis-Menten curve for the multi-step process of steroid-regulated gene induction. This model suggests that steps far downstream from receptor binding to steroid can influence the EC(50) of agonist-complexes and partial agonist activity of antagonist-complexes. We therefore asked whether inhibitors of three possible downstream steps can reverse the effects of increased concentrations of two factors: glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and Ubc9. The downstream steps (with inhibitors in parentheses) are protein deacetylation (TSA and VPA), DNA unwinding (CPT), and CTD phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II (DRB and H8). None of the inhibitors mimic or prevent the effects of added GRs. However, inhibitors of DNA unwinding and CTD phosphorylation do reverse the effects of Ubc9 with high GR concentrations. These results support our earlier conclusion that different rate-limiting steps operate at low and high GR concentrations versus high GR with Ubc9. The present data also suggest that downstream steps can modulate the EC(50) of GR-mediated induction, thus both supporting the utility of our mathematical model and widening the field of biochemical processes that can modify the EC(50).

Mercury influences rat liver tyrosine aminotransferase activity and induction by dexamethasone

The effects of mercury (Hg) on basal and dexamethasone-induced tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) activity in rat liver were studied. Comparison of TAT activity after in vitro and in vivo mercury application revealed the influence of the metal only when applied in vivo, suggesting that the effects are expressed at the level of TAT gene transcription. Intraperitoneal administration of mercury at 1, 2 or 3 mg Hg kg(-1) b.w. 4 h before decapitation was shown to stimulate the basal activity of TAT. The most prominent increase was observed 4 h after the metal administration. When applied at 1 and 2 mg Hg kg(-1) b.w. mercury was also shown to reduce partially the extent of the enzyme induction by dexamethasone, which was injected intraperitoneally at 5 mg kg(-1) b.w. 5 h before death. The highest dose of mercury (3 mg Hg kg(-1) b.w.) almost completely abolished the dexamethasone effect. The finding that mercury increases basal activity of the enzyme while decreasing its induction by dexamethasone suggests that stimulatory effects of this metal on TAT activity are probably mediated by factors other than glucocorticoids.

Corepressor binding to progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors involves the activation function-1 domain and is inhibited by molybdate

Corepressors are known to interact via their receptor interaction domains (RIDs) with the ligand binding domain in the carboxyl terminal half of steroid/nuclear receptors. We now report that a portion of the activation function-1 domain of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), which is the major transactivation sequence, is necessary but not sufficient for corepressor [nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT)] RID binding to GRs and PRs in both mammalian two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation assays. Importantly, these two receptor sequences are functionally interchangeable in the context of GR for transactivation, corepressor binding, and corepressor modulatory activity assays. This suggests that corepressors may act in part by physically blocking portions of receptor activation function-1 domains. However, differences exist in corepressor binding to GRs and PRs. The C-terminal domain of PRs has a higher affinity for corepressor than that of GRs. The ability of some segments of the coactivator TIF2 to competitively inhibit corepressor binding to receptors is different for GRs and PRs. With each receptor, the cell-free binding of corepressors to ligand-free receptor is prevented by sodium molybdate, which is a well-known inhibitor of receptor activation to the DNA-binding state. This suggests that receptor activation precedes binding to corepressors. Collectively, these results indicate that corepressor binding to GRs and PRs involve both N- and C-terminal sequences of activated receptors but differ in ways that may contribute to the unique biological responses of each receptor in intact cells.

Glucocorticoid Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Is Sufficient for the Modulation of Glucocorticoid Induction Properties by Homologous Receptors, Coactivator Transcription Intermediary Factor 2, and Ubc9

Several factors modulate the position of the dose-response curve of steroid receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of antagonist complexes, thereby causing differential gene activation by circulating hormones and unequal gene repression during endocrine therapies with antisteroids. We now ask whether the modulatory activity of three factors (homologous receptor, coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2, and Ubc9) requires the same or different domains of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). In all cases, we find that neither the amino terminal half of the receptor, which contains the activation function-1 activation domain, nor the DNA binding domain is required. This contrasts with the major role of activation function-1 in determining the amount of gene expression and partial agonist activity of antisteroids with most steroid receptors. However, the situation is more complicated with Ubc9, where GR N-terminal sequences prevent the actions of Ubc9, but not added GR or transcription intermediary factor 2, at low GR concentrations. Inhibition is relieved by deletion of these sequences or by replacement with the comparable region of progesterone receptors but not by overexpression of the repressive sequences. These results plus the binding of C-terminal GR sequences to the suppressive N-terminal domain implicate an intramolecular mechanism for the inhibition of Ubc9 actions at low GR concentrations. A shift from noncooperative to cooperative steroid binding at high GR concentrations suggests that conformational changes reposition the inhibitory N-terminal sequence to allow Ubc9 interaction with elements of the ligand binding domain. Collectively, these results indicate a dominant role of GR C-terminal sequences in the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes. They also reveal mechanistic differences both among individual modulators and between the ability of the same factors to regulate the total amount of gene expression.

Muscle ring finger protein-1 inhibits PKC{epsilon} activation and prevents cardiomyocyte hypertrophy

Much effort has focused on characterizing the signal transduction cascades that are associated with cardiac hypertrophy. In spite of this, we still know little about the mechanisms that inhibit hypertrophic growth. We define a novel anti-hypertrophic signaling pathway regulated by muscle ring finger protein-1 (MURF1) that inhibits the agonist-stimulated PKC-mediated signaling response in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. MURF1 interacts with receptor for activated protein kinase C (RACK1) and colocalizes with RACK1 after activation with phenylephrine or PMA. Coincident with this agonist-stimulated interaction, MURF1 blocks PKCε translocation to focal adhesions, which is a critical event in the hypertrophic signaling cascade. MURF1 inhibits focal adhesion formation, and the activity of downstream effector ERK1/2 is also inhibited in the presence of MURF1. MURF1 inhibits phenylephrine-induced (but not IGF-1–induced) increases in cell size. These findings establish that MURF1 is a key regulator of the PKC-dependent hypertrophic response and can blunt cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, which may have important implications in the pathophysiology of clinical cardiac hypertrophy.

Modulation of transcriptional sensitivity of mineralocorticoid and estrogen receptors

Recent reports describe the ability of factors to modulate the position of the dose-response curve of receptor-agonist complexes, and the amount of partial agonist activity of receptor-antagonist complexes, of androgen, glucocorticoid (GRs), and progesterone receptors (PRs). We now ask whether this modulation extends to the two remaining steroid receptors: mineralocorticoid (MRs) and estrogen receptors (ERs). These studies of MR were facilitated by our discovery that the antiglucocorticoid dexamethasone 21-mesylate (Dex-Mes) is a new antimineralocorticoid with significant amounts of partial agonist activity. Elevated levels of MR, the co-activators TIF2 and SRC-1, and the co-repressor SMRT do modulate the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of MR complexes. Interestingly, the precise responses are indistinguishable from those seen with GRs in the same cells. Thus, the unequal transactivation of common genes by MRs versus GRs probably cannot be explained by differential responses to changing cellular concentrations of homologous receptor, co-activators, or co-repressors. We also find that the dose-response curve of ER-estradiol complexes is left-shifted to lower steroid concentrations by higher amounts of exogenous ER. Therefore, the modulation of either the dose-response curve of agonists or the partial agonist activity of antisteroid, and in many cases the modulation of both properties, is a common phenomenon for all of the classical steroid receptors.

Phenotypic alterations in breast cancer cells overexpressing the nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1

BACKGROUND

Estrogen signaling plays a critical role in a number of normal physiological processes and has important implications in the treatment of breast cancer. The p160 nuclear receptor coactivator, AIB1 (amplified in breast cancer 1), is frequently amplified and overexpressed in human breast cancer and has been shown to enhance estrogen-dependent transactivation.

METHODS

To better understand the molecular and physiological consequences of AIB1 overexpression in breast cancer cells, an AIB1 cDNA was transfected into the low AIB1 expressing, estrogen-receptor (ER) negative breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-436. The features of a derivative cell line, designated 436.1, which expresses high levels of AIB1, are described and compared with the parental cell line.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the levels of CREB binding protein (CBP) was observed in 436.1 cells and immunofluorescent staining revealed altered AIB1 and CBP staining patterns compared to the parental cells. Further, transient transfection assays demonstrated that the overall estrogen-dependent transactivation in 436.1 cells is approximately 20-fold higher than the parental cells and the estrogen dose-response curve is repositioned to the right. Finally, cDNA microarray analysis of approximately 7,100 cDNAs identified a number of differentially expressed genes in the 436.1 cells.

CONCLUSION

These observations lend insight into downstream signaling pathways that are influenced by AIB1.

The interplay between the glucocorticoid receptor and nuclear factor-kappaB or activator protein-1: molecular mechanisms for gene repression

The inflammatory response is a highly regulated physiological process that is critically important for homeostasis. A precise physiological control of inflammation allows a timely reaction to invading pathogens or to other insults without causing overreaction liable to damage the host. The cellular signaling pathways identified as important regulators of inflammation are the signal transduction cascades mediated by the nuclear factor-kappaB and the activator protein-1, which can both be modulated by glucocorticoids. Their use in the clinic includes treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, allograft rejection, and allergic skin diseases. Although glucocorticoids have been widely used since the late 1940s, the molecular mechanisms responsible for their antiinflammatory activity are still under investigation. The various molecular pathways proposed so far are discussed in more detail.

The importance of being varied in steroid receptor transactivation

A major response of steroid receptors to steroid hormones is the induction of gene transcription. Two relevant, albeit less studied, properties of these receptors are the EC(50) values of the receptor-agonist complexes and the partial agonist activity of the receptor-antagonist complexes. Contrary to earlier expectations, neither the EC(50) value nor the partial agonist activity is constant for a given receptor-steroid complex. This variation is, however, beneficial to cells and organisms because it provides a mechanism both for differential control of gene expression by a single concentration of circulating hormone and for limiting side-effects during endocrine therapies. In this article, the factors and proposed mechanisms for the modulation of the EC(50) value and partial agonist activity of receptor-steroid complexes are discussed.

A second pathway for modulating glucocorticoid receptor transactivation properties

We recently reported that three factors (a cis-acting element and changing concentrations of receptor or coactivator TIF2) act at a common rate-limiting step to modulate the position of the dose-response curve and the partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). The ability of saturating levels of GR, and added inhibitors, to prevent the actions of the three modulators (cis-acting element, GR, and TIF2) but not the currently investigated C-terminal fragment of E1A-13S (E1A-133C) indicates that E1A-133C alters GR properties via a second pathway that is downstream of the common step for the original three modulators. hSur2 binds to E1A-133C. We find that hSur2 modulates GR transactivation properties, thus suggesting that the effects of E1A-133C are due to the recruitment of hSur2. hSur2 also modifies GR activities in the presence of saturating GR concentrations, which is consistent with hSur2 acting downstream of the common step for the original three modulators. The H160Y mutation, which eliminates hSur2 binding to E1A, blocks most of the activity of E1A-133C. This suggests that the modulatory activity of E1A-133C is largely due to the binding of hSur2, which is a component of the Mediator complex. Collectively, these data support the existence of a new pathway for modulating GR transactivation processes, thereby increasing the number of cellular mechanisms that permit differential control of gene expression by endogenous levels of glucocorticoid hormones.

Modulation of induction properties of glucocorticoid receptor-agonist and -antagonist complexes by coactivators involves binding to receptors but is independent of ability of coactivators to augment transactivation

Coactivators such as TIF2 and SRC-1 modulate the positioning of the dose-response curve for agonist-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoid complexes. These properties of coactivators differ from their initially defined activities of binding to, and increasing the total levels of transactivation by, agonist-bound steroid receptors. We now report that constructs of TIF2 and SRC-1 lacking the two activation domains (AD1 and AD2) have significantly less ability to increase transactivation but retain most of the activity for modulating the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity. Mammalian two-hybrid experiments show that the minimum TIF2 segment with modulatory activity (TIF2.4) does not interact with p300, CREB-binding protein, or PCAF, which also modulates GR activities. DRIP150 and DRIP205 have been implicated in coactivator actions but are unable to modulate GR activities. The absence of synergism by PCAF or DRIP150 with SRC-1 or TIF2, respectively, further suggests that these other factors are not involved. The ability of a TIF2.4 fragment (i.e. TIF2.37), which is not known to interact with proteins, to block the actions of TIF2.4 suggests that an unidentified binder mediates the modulatory activity of TIF2. Pull-down experiments with GST/TIF2.4 demonstrate a direct interaction of TIF2 with GR in a hormone-dependent fashion that requires the receptor interaction domains of TIF2 and is equally robust with agonists and most antiglucocorticoids. These observations, which are confirmed in mammalian two-hybrid assays, suggest that the capacity of coactivators such as TIF2 to modulate the partial agonist activity of antisteroids is mediated by the binding of coactivators to GR-antagonist complexes. In conclusion, the modulatory activity of coactivators with GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes is mechanistically distinct from the ability of coactivators to augment the total levels of transactivation and appears to involve the binding to both GR-steroid complexes and an unidentified TIF2-associated factor(s).

Structure/activity elements of the multifunctional protein, GMEB-1. Characterization of domains relevant for the modulation of glucocorticoid receptor transactivation properties

GMEB-1 was initially described as a component of a 550-kDa heteromeric DNA binding complex that is involved in the modulation of two properties of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) transactivation, the dose-response curve of agonists and the partial agonist activity of antagonists. Subsequently, GMEB-1 was also found to bind to hsp27, to associate with the coactivator TIF2 in yeast cells, and to participate in Parvovirus replication. To understand these multiple activities of GMEB-1 at a molecular level, we have now determined which regions are associated with the various activities associated with the modulation of GR transactivation properties. These activities include, homooligomerization, heterooligomerization, DNA binding, binding to GR and the transcriptional cofactor CBP, and GR modulation. Complex activities such as DNA binding and GR modulation, are found to require the physical combination of those domains that would be predicted from the involved biochemical processes. We have previously documented that GMEB-1 possesses both GR modulatory and intrinsic transactivation activity. However, the domains for these two activities of GMEB-1 are found not to overlap. This separation of activities provides a structural basis for our prior biological observations that the modulation of the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity of GR complexes is independent of the total levels of gene activation by the same GR complexes.

Ubc9 is a novel modulator of the induction properties of glucocorticoid receptors

The EC(50) of agonists and the partial agonist activity of antagonists are crucial parameters for steroid hormone control of gene expression and endocrine therapies. These parameters have been shown to be modulated by a naturally occurring cis-acting element, called the glucocorticoid modulatory element (GME) that binds two proteins, GMEB-1 and -2. We now present evidence that the GMEBs contact Ubc9, which is the mammalian homolog of a yeast E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Ubc9 also binds to glucocorticoid receptors (GRs). Ubc9 displays no intrinsic transactivation activity but modifies both the absolute amount of induced gene product and the fold induction by GR. With high concentrations of GR, added Ubc9 also reduces the EC(50) of agonists and increases the partial agonist activity of antagonists in a manner that is independent of the ability of Ubc9 to transfer SUMO-1 (small ubiquitin-like modifier-1) to proteins. This new activity of Ubc9 requires only the ligand binding domain of GR and part of the hinge region. Interestingly, Ubc9 modulation of full-length GR transcriptional properties can be seen in the absence of a GME. This, though, is consistent with the GME acting by increasing the local concentration of Ubc9, which then activates a previously unobserved target in the transcriptional machinery. With high concentrations of Ubc9 and GR, Ubc9 binding to GR appears to be sufficient to permit Ubc9 to act independently of the GME.

Muscle-specific RING finger-1 interacts with titin to regulate sarcomeric M-line and thick filament structure and may have nuclear functions via its interaction with glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein-1

The COOH-terminal A168-170 region of the giant sarcomeric protein titin interacts with muscle-specific RING finger-1 (MURF-1). To investigate the functional significance of this interaction, we expressed green fluorescent protein fusion constructs encoding defined fragments of titin's M-line region and MURF-1 in cardiac myocytes. Upon expression of MURF-1 or its central region (containing its titin-binding site), the integrity of titin's M-line region was dramatically disrupted. Disruption of titin's M-line region also resulted in a perturbation of thick filament components, but, surprisingly, not of the NH2-terminal or I-band regions of titin, the Z-lines, or the thin filaments. This specific phenotype also was caused by the expression of titin A168-170. These data suggest that the interaction of titin with MURF-1 is important for the stability of the sarcomeric M-line region.MURF-1 also binds to ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme-9 and isopeptidase T-3, enzymes involved in small ubiquitin-related modifier-mediated nuclear import, and with glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein-1 (GMEB-1), a transcriptional regulator. Consistent with our in vitro binding data implicating MURF-1 with nuclear functions, endogenous MURF-1 also was detected in the nuclei of some myocytes. The dual interactions of MURF-1 with titin and GMEB-1 may link myofibril signaling pathways (perhaps including titin's kinase domain) with muscle gene expression.

Evidence for a common step in three different processes for modulating the kinetic properties of glucocorticoid receptor-induced gene transcription

The dose-response curve of steroid hormones and the associated EC(50) value are critical parameters both in the development of new pharmacologically active compounds and in the endocrine therapy of various disease states. We have recently described three different variables that can reposition the dose-response curve of agonist-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GRs): a 21-base pair sequence of the rat tyrosine aminotransferase gene called a glucocorticoid modulatory element (GME), GR concentration, and coactivator concentration. At the same time, each of these three components was found to influence the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoids. In an effort to determine whether these three processes proceed via independent pathways or a common intermediate, we have examined several mechanistic details. The effects of increasing concentrations of both GR and the coactivator TIF2 are found to be saturable. Furthermore, saturating levels of either GR or TIF2 inhibit the ability of each protein, and the GME, to affect further changes in the dose-response curve or partial agonist activity of antisteroids. This competitive inhibition suggests that all three modulators proceed through a common step involving a titratable factor. Support for this hypothesis comes from the observation that a fragment of the coactivator TIF2 retaining intrinsic transactivation activity is a dominant negative inhibitor of each component (GME, GR, and coactivator). This inhibition was not due to nonspecific effects on the general transcription machinery as the VP16 transactivation domain was inactive. The viral protein E1A also prevented the action of each of the three components in a manner that was independent of E1A's ability to block the histone acetyltransferase activity of CBP. Collectively, these results suggest that three different inputs (GME, GR, and coactivator) for perturbing the dose-response curve, and partial agonist activity, of GR-steroid complexes act by converging at a single step that involves a limiting factor prior to transcription initiation.

Properties of the glucocorticoid modulatory element binding proteins GMEB-1 and -2: potential new modifiers of glucocorticoid receptor transactivation and members of the family of KDWK proteins

An important component of glucocorticoid steroid induction of tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT) gene expression is the glucocorticoid modulatory element (GME), which is located at -3.6 kb of the rat TAT gene. The GME both mediates a greater sensitivity to hormone, due to a left shift in the dose-response curve of agonists, and increases the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoids. These properties of the GME are intimately related to the binding of a heteromeric complex of two proteins (GMEB-1 and -2). We previously cloned the rat GMEB-2 as a 67-kDa protein. We now report the cloning of the other member of the GME binding complex, the 88-kDa human GMEB-1, and various properties of both proteins. GMEB-1 and -2 each possess an intrinsic transactivation activity in mammalian one-hybrid assays, consistent with our proposed model in which they modify glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-regulated gene induction. This hypothesis is supported by interactions between GR and both GMEB-1 and -2 in mammalian two-hybrid and in pull-down assays. Furthermore, overexpression of GMEB-1 and -2, either alone or in combination, results in a reversible right shift in the dose-response curve, and decreased agonist activity of antisteroids, as expected from the squelching of other limiting factors. Additional mechanistic details that are compatible with the model of GME action are suggested by the interactions in a two-hybrid assay of both GMEBs with CREB-binding protein (CBP) and the absence of histone acetyl transferase (HAT) activity in both proteins. GMEB-1 and -2 share a sequence of 90 amino acids that is 80% identical. This region also displays homology to several other proteins containing a core sequence of KDWK. Thus, the GMEBs may be members of a new family of factors with interesting transcriptional properties.