Mutation of the class I beta-tubulin gene does not predict response to paclitaxel for breast cancer

Long Noncoding RNAs in Taxane Resistance of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a common cancer in women and a leading cause of mortality. With the early diagnosis and development of therapeutic drugs, the prognosis of breast cancer has markedly improved. Chemotherapy is one of the predominant strategies for the treatment of breast cancer. Taxanes, including paclitaxel and docetaxel, are widely used in the treatment of breast cancer and remarkably decrease the risk of death and recurrence. However, taxane resistance caused by multiple factors significantly impacts the effect of the drug and leads to poor prognosis. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to play a significant role in critical cellular processes, and a number of studies have illustrated that lncRNAs play vital roles in taxane resistance. In this review, we systematically summarize the mechanisms of taxane resistance in breast cancer and the functions of lncRNAs in taxane resistance in breast cancer. The findings provide insight into the role of lncRNAs in taxane resistance and suggest that lncRNAs may be used to develop therapeutic targets to prevent or reverse taxane resistance in patients with breast cancer.

Therapeutic strategies to overcome taxane resistance in cancer

One of the primary causes of attenuated or loss of efficacy of cancer chemotherapy is the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR). Numerous studies have been published regarding potential approaches to reverse resistance to taxanes, including paclitaxel (PTX) and docetaxel, which represent one of the most important classes of anticancer drugs. Since 1984, following the FDA approval of paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma, taxanes have been extensively used as drugs that target tumor microtubules. Taxanes, have been shown to affect an array of oncogenic signaling pathways and have potent cytotoxic efficacy. However, the clinical success of these drugs has been restricted by the emergence of cancer cell resistance, primarily caused by the overexpression of MDR efflux transporters or by microtubule alterations. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that the mechanisms underlying the resistance to PTX and docetaxel are primarily due to alterations in α-tubulin and β-tubulin. Moreover, resistance to PTX and docetaxel results from: 1) alterations in microtubule-protein interactions, including microtubule-associated protein 4, stathmin, centriole, cilia, spindle-associated protein, and kinesins; 2) alterations in the expression and activity of multidrug efflux transporters of the ABC superfamily including P-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1); 3) overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins or inhibition of apoptotic proteins and tumor-suppressor proteins, as well as 4) modulation of signal transduction pathways associated with the activity of several cytokines, chemokines and transcription factors. In this review, we discuss the abovementioned molecular mechanisms and their role in mediating cancer chemoresistance to PTX and docetaxel. We provide a detailed analysis of both in vitro and in vivo experimental data and describe the application of these findings to therapeutic practice. The current review also discusses the efficacy of different pharmacological modulations to achieve reversal of PTX resistance. The therapeutic roles of several novel compounds, as well as herbal formulations, are also discussed. Among them, many structural derivatives had efficacy against the MDR phenotype by either suppressing MDR or increasing the cytotoxic efficacy compared to the parental drugs, or both. Natural products functioning as MDR chemosensitizers offer novel treatment strategies in patients with chemoresistant cancers by attenuating MDR and increasing chemotherapy efficacy. We broadly discuss the roles of inhibitors of P-gp and other efflux pumps, in the reversal of PTX and docetaxel resistance in cancer cells and the significance of using a nanomedicine delivery system in this context. Thus, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating the reversal of drug resistance, combined with drug efficacy and the application of target-based inhibition or specific drug delivery, could signal a new era in modern medicine that would limit the pathological consequences of MDR in cancer patients.

The Roles of β-Tubulin Mutations and Isotype Expression in Acquired Drug Resistance

The antitumor drug paclitaxel stabilizes microtubules and reduces their dynamicity, promoting mitotic arrest and eventually apoptosis. Upon assembly of the α/β-tubulin heterodimer, GTP becomes bound to both the α and β-tubulin monomers. During microtubule assembly, the GTP bound to β-tubulin is hydrolyzed to GDP, eventually reaching steady-state equilibrium between free tubulin dimers and those polymerized into microtubules. Tubulin-binding drugs such as paclitaxel interact with β-tubulin, resulting in the disruption of this equilibrium. In spite of several crystal structures of tubulin, there is little biochemical insight into the mechanism by which anti-tubulin drugs target microtubules and alter their normal behavior. The mechanism of drug action is further complicated, as the description of altered β-tubulin isotype expression and/or mutations in tubulin genes may lead to drug resistance as has been described in the literature. Because of the relationship between β-tubulin isotype expression and mutations within β-tubulin, both leading to resistance, we examined the properties of altered residues within the taxane, colchicine and Vinca binding sites. The amount of data now available, allows us to investigate common patterns that lead to microtubule disruption and may provide a guide to the rational design of novel compounds that can inhibit microtubule dynamics for specific tubulin isotypes or, indeed resistant cell lines. Because of the vast amount of data published to date, we will only provide a broad overview of the mutational results and how these correlate with differences between tubulin isotypes. We also note that clinical studies describe a number of predictive factors for the response to anti-tubulin drugs and attempt to develop an understanding of the features within tubulin that may help explain how they may affect both microtubule assembly and stability.

Taxanes with high potency inducing tubulin assembly overcome tumoural cell resistances

We have found that four taxanes with chemical modifications at positions C10 and C13 were active against all types of taxane resistant cell lines, resistant by P-gp overexpression, by mutations in the β-tubulin binding site or by overexpression of the highly dynamic βIII-tubulin isotype. We have characterized the interaction of taxanes with high activity on chemotherapy resistant tumoural cells with microtubules, and also studied their cellular effects. The biochemical property enhanced in comparison with other taxanes is their potency at inducing tubulin assembly, despite the fact that their interactions with the microtubule binding sites (pore and luminal) are similar as studied by NMR and SAXS. A differential interaction with the S7-S9 loop (M-loop) is responsible for their enhanced assembly induction properties. The chemical changes in the structure also induce changes in the thermodynamic properties of the interaction, indicating a higher hydrophilicity and also explaining their properties on P-gp and βIII overexpressing cells and on mutant cells. The effect of the compounds on the microtubular network is different from those observed with the classical (docetaxel and paclitaxel) taxanes, inducing different bundling in cells with microtubules being very short, indicating a very fast nucleation effect and reflecting their high assembly induction power.

Taxane resistance in breast cancer: mechanisms, predictive biomarkers and circumvention strategies

BACKGROUND

Taxanes are established in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and early breast cancer (EBC) as potent chemotherapy agents. However, their therapeutic usefulness is limited by de-novo refractoriness or acquired resistance, which are common drawbacks to most anti-cancer cytotoxics. Considering that the taxanes will remain principle chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of breast cancer, we reviewed known mechanisms of resistance in with an outlook of optimizing their clinical use.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles (from inception through to 9th January 2012; last search 10/01/2012) and journals known to publish information relevant to taxane chemotherapy. We imposed no language restrictions. Search terms included: cancer, breast cancer, response, resistance, taxane, paclitaxel, docetaxel, taxol. Due to the possibility of alternative mechanisms of resistance all combination chemotherapy treated data sets were removed from our overview.

RESULTS

Over-expression of the MDR-1 gene product Pgp was extensively studied in vitro in association with taxane resistance, but data are conflicting. Similarly, the target components microtubules, which are thought to mediate refractoriness through alterations of the expression pattern of tubulins or microtubule associated proteins and the expression of alternative tubulin isoforms, failed to confirm such associations. Little consensus has been generated for reported associations between taxane-sensitivity and mutated p53, or taxane-resistance and overexpression of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL or NFkB. In contrary sufficient in vitro data support an association of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) defects with resistance. Clinical data have been limited and inconsistent, which relate to the variety of methods used, lack of standardization of cut-offs for quantitation, differences in clinical endpoints measured and in methods of tissue collection preparation and storage, and study/patient heterogeneity. The most prominent finding is that pharmaceutical down-regulation of HER-2 appears to reverse the taxane resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently no valid practical biomarkers exist that can predict resistance to the taxanes in breast cancer supporting the principle of individualized cancer therapy. The incorporation of several biomarker analyses into prospectively designed studies in this setting are needed.

βII-Tubulin and βIII-Tubulin Mediate Sensitivity to Peloruside A and Laulimalide, but not Paclitaxel or Vinblastine, in Human Ovarian Carcinoma Cells

Increased abundance of βII- and βIII-tubulin isotypes in cancer cells confers resistance to vinca and taxoid site drugs; however, the role of these isotypes in the acquired resistance of cancer cells to non-vinca or non-taxoid site binding agents has not been described. Peloruside A (PLA) and laulimalide are the only known non-taxoid site microtubule-stabilizing agents. A human ovarian cancer cell line, 1A9-L4 (L4), previously selected in high concentrations of laulimalide, has both a single point mutation in βI-tubulin and overexpression of βII- and βIII-tubulin. The cells are highly resistant to PLA as well as laulimalide but show no cross-resistance to taxoid site drugs or drugs that bind to the vinca site on β-tubulin. To understand the functional significance of the βII- and βIII-tubulin changes in this resistant cell line, isotype-specific short interfering RNA was used to knock down the expression of the βII and βIII isotypes, and the cellular effects of PLA and laulimalide were examined before and after silencing. It was found that inhibition of βII- and βIII-tubulin partially sensitized L4 cells to PLA and laulimalide, as seen by increased potency of PLA and laulimalide for inducing growth inhibition, cellular tubulin polymerization, microtubule aberrations, and G2-M arrest in the resistant cells. The sensitivity to paclitaxel, vinblastine, ixabepilone, and cisplatin was unaffected by the inhibition of isotype expression. It was concluded that the increased βII- and βIII-tubulin contributed significantly to the resistance phenotype, along with the tubulin structural mutation, and that the altered isotype effect was binding site specific. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(2); 393–404. ©2011 AACR.

Analysis of Beta-Tubulin Gene Exon 4 Mutations in Advanced Stage III or IV Gastric Cancer

The mechanisms that cause chemoresistance of gastric cancer have yet to be elucidated. Taxanes and promising agents that were recently approved for treatment of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Mutations of beta-tubulin, which is a target of taxianes, have been shown to confer chemoresistance against these agents. The aim of the present study is to investigate the presence of mutations of the beta-tubulin in gastric cancer tissues. Sixty-six patients with advanced stage III or IV gastric cancer patients enrolled in this study. Paired samples of gastric cancer tissue and normal mucosa were obtained by endoscopy. The guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP)-binding site in exon 4 of the beta-tubulin gene was examined by polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis, followed by sequencing of the products with abnormally shifted bands. SSCP analysis showed abnormal bands upstream of the GTP-binding site in 7 of the 66 patients, but sequence analysis found no nucleotide substitutions in these patients. Three variant bands were also detected down stream of the the GTP-binding site, but the sequences of the 3 products corresponded to those of two independent pseudogenes. Thus, none of the tumor samples showed mutation of the beta-tubulin exon 4 GTP-binding site. In conclusion, these findings suggest that mutations of the beta-tubulin gene are rare and are unlikely to be an important cause of taxane resistance to taxians.

New insights into mechanisms of resistance to microtubule inhibitors

Mechanisms to explain tumor cell resistance to drugs that target the microtubule cytoskeleton have relied on the assumption that the drugs act either to suppress microtubule dynamics or to perturb the balance between assembled and nonassembled tubulin. Recently, however, it was found that these drugs also alter the stability of microtubule attachment to centrosomes, and do so at the same concentrations that are needed to inhibit cell division. Based on this new information, a new model is presented that explains resistance resulting from a variety of molecular changes that have been reported in the literature. The improved understanding of drug action and resistance has important implications for chemotherapy with these agents.

Peloruside- and laulimalide-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells have βI-tubulin mutations and altered expression of βII- and βIII-tubulin isotypes

Peloruside A and laulimalide are potent microtubule-stabilizing natural products with a mechanism of action similar to that of paclitaxel. However, the binding site of peloruside A and laulimalide on tubulin remains poorly understood. Drug resistance in anticancer treatment is a serious problem. We developed peloruside A- and laulimalide-resistant cell lines by selecting 1A9 human ovarian carcinoma cells that were able to grow in the presence of one of these agents. The 1A9-laulimalide resistant cells (L4) were 39-fold resistant to the selecting agent and 39-fold cross-resistant to peloruside A, whereas the 1A9-peloruside A resistant cells (R1) were 6-fold resistant to the selecting agent while they remained sensitive to laulimalide. Neither cell line showed resistance to paclitaxel or other drugs that bind to the taxoid site on β-tubulin nor was there resistance to microtubule-destabilizing drugs. The resistant cells exhibited impaired peloruside A/laulimalide-induced tubulin polymerization and impaired mitotic arrest. Tubulin mutations were found in the βI-tubulin isotype, R306H or R306C for L4 and A296T for R1 cells. This is the first cell-based evidence to support a β-tubulin-binding site for peloruside A and laulimalide. To determine whether the different resistance phenotypes of the cells were attributable to any other tubulin alterations, the β-tubulin isotype composition of the cells was examined. Increased expression of βII- and βIII-tubulin was observed in L4 cells only. These results provide insight into how alterations in tubulin lead to unique resistance profiles for two drugs, peloruside A and laulimalide, that have a similar mode of action.

Overcoming tumor multidrug resistance using drugs able to evade P-glycoprotein or to exploit its expression

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major obstacle to the effective treatment of cancer. Cellular overproduction of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), which acts as an efflux pump for various anticancer drugs (e.g. anthracyclines, Vinca alkaloids, taxanes, epipodophyllotoxins, and some of the newer antitumor drugs) is one of the more relevant mechanisms underlying MDR. P-gp belongs to the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette transporters and is encoded by the ABCB1 gene. Its overexpression in cancer cells has become a therapeutic target for circumventing MDR. As an alternative to the classical pharmacological strategy of the coadministration of pump inhibitors and cytotoxic substrates of P-gp and to other approaches applied in experimental tumor models (e.g. P-gp-targeting antibodies, ABCB1 gene silencing strategies, and transcriptional modulators) and in the clinical setting (e.g. incapsulation of P-gp substrate anticancer drugs into liposomes or nanoparticles), a more intriguing strategy for circumventing MDR is represented by the development of new anticancer drugs which are not substrates of P-gp (e.g. epothilones, second- and third-generation taxanes and other microtubule modulators, topoisomerase inhibitors). Some of these drugs have already been tested in clinical trials and, in most of cases, show relevant activity in patients previously treated with anticancer agents which are substrates of P-gp. Of these drugs, ixabepilone, an epothilone, was approved in the United States for the treatment of breast cancer patients pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Another innovative approach is the use of molecules whose activity takes advantage of the overexpression of P-gp. The possibility of overcoming MDR using the latter two approaches is reviewed herein. 

Human mutations that confer paclitaxel resistance

The involvement of tubulin mutations as a cause of clinical drug resistance has been intensely debated in recent years. In the studies described here, we used transfection to test whether beta1-tubulin mutations and polymorphisms found in cancer patients are able to confer resistance to drugs that target microtubules. Three of four mutations (A185T, A248V, R306C, but not G437S) that we tested caused paclitaxel resistance, as indicated by the following observations: (a) essentially 100% of cells selected in paclitaxel contained transfected mutant tubulin; (b) paclitaxel resistance could be turned off using tetracycline to turn off transgene expression; (c) paclitaxel resistance increased as mutant tubulin production increased. All the paclitaxel resistance mutations disrupted microtubule assembly, conferred increased sensitivity to microtubule-disruptive drugs, and produced defects in mitosis. The results are consistent with a mechanism in which tubulin mutations alter microtubule stability in a way that counteracts drug action. These studies show that human tumor cells can acquire spontaneous mutations in beta1-tubulin that cause resistance to paclitaxel, and suggest that patients with some polymorphisms in beta1-tubulin may require higher drug concentrations for effective therapy.

Pharmacogenomics of taxane/platinum therapy in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

Taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Despite an initial high response to therapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low. The identification of pharmacogenomic markers to identify patients unlikely to respond or at risk for severe toxicity will assist in the goal of individualizing ovarian cancer treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Most studies have assessed single nucleotide polymorphisms from genes involved in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs.

RESULTS

Unfortunately, most markers identified have not been replicated in subsequent studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Other mechanisms of variability, including epigenetic control of gene expression and copy number variation, may play important roles. In addition, nongenetic influences such as concurrent medications, and physiological and environmental factors could also affect individual responses to taxane and platinum therapy.

Paclitaxel and docetaxel resistance: molecular mechanisms and development of new generation taxanes

Taxanes represent one of the most promising classes of anticancer agents. Unfortunately, their clinical success has been limited by the insurgence of cellular resistance, mainly mediated by the expression of the MDR phenotype or by microtubule alterations. However, the remarkable relevance of paclitaxel and docetaxel in clinical oncology stimulated intensive efforts in the last decade to identify new derivatives endowed with improved activities towards resistant tumor cells, resulting in a huge number of novel natural and synthetic taxanes. Among them, several structurally different derivatives were found to exhibit a promising behavior against the MDR phenotype in terms of either MDR inhibiting properties, or enhanced cytotoxicity compared to parental drugs, or both. On the other hand, only in more recent years have the first taxanes retaining activity against resistant cancer cells bearing alterations of the tubulin/microtubule system emerged. This review describes the main molecular mechanisms of resistance to paclitaxel and docetaxel identified so far, focusing on the advances achieved in the development of new taxanes potentially useful for the treatment of resistant tumors.

Cellular mechanisms of resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes in cancer: intrinsic and acquired

Taxanes and anthracyclines are two of the most potent and broadly effective classes of chemotherapeutic agents. However, resistance to these agents is common and significantly limits their potential. As such, there is a great need to understand the mechanisms underlying de novo and acquired resistance to these agents. Beyond the resistance barrier lies even greater potential to significantly alter the natural course of human cancer. This review discusses what we currently understand about the mechanisms of resistance to taxanes and anthracyclines. Preclinical models suggest a role for ATP-binding cassette transporters, tubulin isoforms, microtubule-associated proteins, tubulin gene mutations, and mitotic checkpoint signaling proteins in resistance to taxanes. Preclinical models also suggest that drug transport proteins, antioxidant defenses, apoptotic signaling, and topoisomerase modulation may mediate anthracycline resistance. Many of these hypotheses remain untested in appropriately designed clinical studies, but limited clinical evidence will be reviewed. Epothilones represent a novel class of non-taxane microtubule stabilizing agents with distinct drug-resistance profiles. Potential mechanisms behind these differences and their potential role in the treatment of both taxane- and anthracycline-refractory patients are discussed.

Resistance to chemotherapy in cancer: a complex and integrated cellular response

Inherent and acquired resistance pathways account for the high rate of failure in cancer chemotherapy. The mechanisms or pathways mediating resistance may be classified as pharmacokinetic (i.e. alter intratumour drug exposue) or pharmacodynamic (i.e. failure to elicit cytotoxicity). More often than not, the resistant phenotype is characterised by alterations in multiple pathways. Consequently, the pathways may act synergistically or generate a broad spectrum of resistance to anticancer drugs. There has been a great deal of systematic characterisation of drug resistance in vitro. However, translating this greater understanding into clinical efficacy has rarely been achieved. This review explores the phenomenon of drug resistance in cancer and highlights the gap between in vitro and in vivo observations. This gap presents a major obstacle in overcoming drug resistance and restoring sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Taxanes, microtubules and chemoresistant breast cancer

The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel are microtubule-stabilizing agents that function primarily by interfering with spindle microtubule dynamics causing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, the mechanisms underlying their action have yet to be fully elucidated. These agents have become widely recognized as active chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and early-stage breast cancer with benefits gained in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). However, even with response to taxane treatment the time to progression (TTP) is relatively short, prolonging life for a matter of months, with studies showing that patients treated with taxanes eventually relapse. This review focuses on chemoresistance to taxane treatment particularly in relation to the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and dysfunctional regulation of apoptotic signaling. Since spindle microtubules are the primary drug targets for taxanes, important SAC proteins such as MAD2, BUBR1, Synuclein-gamma and Aurora A have emerged as potentially important predictive markers of taxane resistance, as have specific checkpoint proteins such as BRCA1. Moreover, overexpression of the drug efflux pump MDR-1/P-gp, altered expression of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) including tau, stathmin and MAP4 may help to identify those patients who are most at risk of recurrence and those patients most likely to benefit from taxane treatment.

Cytoskeleton and paclitaxel sensitivity in breast cancer: the role of beta-tubulins

The antineoplastic effect of paclitaxel is mainly related to its ability to bind the beta subunit of tubulin, thus preventing tubulin chain depolarization and inducing apoptosis. The relevance of the Class I beta-tubulin characteristics have also been confirmed in the clinical setting where mutations of paclitaxel-binding site of beta-tubulin Class I have been related to paclitaxel resistance in non small cell lung and ovarian cancers. In the present study, we verified the hypothesis of a relationship between molecular alterations of beta-tubulin Class I and paclitaxel sensitivity in a panel of breast cell lines with different drug IC(50). The Class I beta-tubulin gene cDNA has been sequenced detecting heterozygous missense mutations (exon 1 and 4) only in MCF-7 and SK-BR-3 lines. Furthermore, the expression (at both mRNA and protein level) of the different isotypes have been analyzed demonstrating an association between low cell sensitivity to paclitaxel and Class III beta-tubulin expression increasing. Antisense oligonucleotide (ODN) experiments confirmed that the inhibition of Class III beta-tubulin could at least partially increase paclitaxel-chemosensitivity. The hypothesis of a relationship between beta-tubulin tumor expression and paclitaxel clinical response has been finally verified in a series of 92 advanced breast cancer patients treated with a first line paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five percent (95% CI: 45-31) of patients with high Class III beta-tubulin expression showed a disease progression vs. only 7% of patients with low expression (35% vs. 7%, p < 0.002). Our study suggests that Class III beta-tubulin tumor expression could be considered a predictive biomarker of paclitaxel-clinical resistance for breast cancer patients.

Predictive factors for response to docetaxel in human breast cancers

Docetaxel has come into wide use recently for the treatment of breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic settings. Docetaxel binds to beta-tubulin and causes kinetic abnormalities in the dynamics of microtubules by increasing their polymerization and inhibiting their depolymerization, resulting in elevated levels of microtubule formation. During metaphase, defective spindle formation induced by docetaxel activates the mitotic checkpoint and leads to cell cycle arrest, culminating in apoptosis. However, docetaxel is not effective for all breast cancers. For example, in metastatic settings, the response rate to docetaxel reportedly ranges from 30 to 50%. It is therefore very important to develop a diagnostic method with high accuracy for the prediction of sensitivity to docetaxel in order to avoid unnecessary treatment. Currently it is impossible to identify, before the initiation of therapy, the patients for whom docetaxel will be effective. Various biological parameters have been studied clinically for their ability to predict response to docetaxel, such as parameters related to: (1) efflux (p-glycoprotein) and metabolism (CYP3A4); (2) beta-tubulin (somatic mutation of beta-tubulin and changes in beta-tubulin isotypes levels); (3) cell cycle (HER2, BRCA1 and Aurora-A); and (4) apoptosis (p53, BCL2 and thioredoxin). More recently, gene expression profiling techniques have been used for the development of a prediction model for response to docetaxel. In the present paper, clinical studies that have been conducted recently to identify predictive factors for response to docetaxel are reviewed together with a presentation of our recent work in this field.

Pharmacogenetics in the Management of Breast Cancer – Prospects for Individualised Treatment

Increased understanding of how variants in genes encoding metabolising enzymes, transporters and receptors affect drug efficacy and toxicity, in parallel with advances in genotyping technology means that clinical pharmacogenetics is drawing tantalisingly close to reality. This review considers some of the pharmacogenetic variants that have been described that are relevant to the management of women with breast cancer and how these may soon translate into clinical practice.

Taxane pharmacogenetics

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel exert their anticancer activity by stabilizing microtubules during cell division. There is significant interindividual variability in response and toxicity between paclitaxel and docetaxel. Interpatient variability also exists for response and toxicity from each drug. Variability within genes involved in paclitaxel and/or docetaxel metabolism and transport exists. However, to date there is little evidence to suggest useful markers for the selection of individualized therapy. Epigenetic regulation of taxane pathway genes may play a large role in explaining the variability in toxicity and response.

GBP1 overexpression is associated with a paclitaxel resistance phenotype

In the search for novel genes involved in the paclitaxel resistance phenotype, prior studies of gene expression in paclitaxel-resistant cell lines and their paired drug-sensitive parental lines using high-density Affymetrix GeneChip arrays identified guanylate-binding protein 1 (GBP1) gene as an overexpressed transcript. The GBP1 gene encodes a large GTPase that is induced by interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) in a variety of eukaryotic cells. In this report we characterize GBP1 and demonstrate that GBP1 expression is consistently upregulated in 7 of 8 paclitaxel or doxorubicin-resistant human cancer cell lines as compared to its expression in the relevant drug-sensitive parental lines. Analysis of GBP1 expression using the Cancer Profiling Array showed that GBP1 is ubiquitously expressed with no significant difference in expression levels between normal and tumor tissue. Parallel analysis of the Cancer Cell Line Profiling Array determined that GBP1 expression in a majority of cell lines derived from human tumors of different tissue origin was induced to variable levels following exposure to multiple stress agents including paclitaxel and doxorubicin. Importantly, stable expression of a GBP1 transgene in the paclitaxel-sensitive ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR8 was sufficient to confer moderate paclitaxel resistance. Our data suggest that increased expression of the GBP1 gene may play an important role in the development of multi-drug resistance (MDR).

Pharmacogenetics for individualized cancer chemotherapy

The same doses of medication cause considerable heterogeneity in efficacy and toxicity across human populations. Genetic factors are thought to represent important determinants of drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenetics focuses on the prediction of the response of tumor and normal tissue to standard therapy by genetic profiling and, thereby, to select the most appropriate medication at optimal doses for each individual patient. In the present review, we discuss the relevance of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in genes, whose gene products act upstream of the actual drug target sites, that is, drug transporters and drug metabolizing phase I and II enzymes, or downstream of them, that is, apoptosis-regulating genes and chemokines. SNPs in relevant genes, which encode for proteins that interact with anticancer drugs, were also considered, that is, enzymes of DNA biosynthesis and metabolism, DNA repair enzymes, and proteins of the mitotic spindle. A significant body of evidence supports the concept of predicting drug efficacy and toxicity by SNP genotyping. As the efficacy of cancer chemotherapy, as well as the drug-related toxicity in normal tissues is multifactorial in nature, sophisticated approaches such as genome-wide linkage analyses and integrate drug pathway profiling may improve the predictive power compared with genotyping of single genes. The implementation of pharmacogenetics into clinical routine diagnostics including genotype-based recommendations for treatment decisions and risk assessment for practitioners represents a challenge for the future.

No significant role for beta tubulin mutations and mismatch repair defects in ovarian cancer resistance to paclitaxel/cisplatin

Background

The mechanisms of chemoresistance in ovarian cancer patients remain largely to be elucidated. Paclitaxel/cisplatin combination is the standard chemotherapeutic treatment for this disease, although some patients do not respond to therapy. Our goals were to investigate whether TUBB mutations and mismatch repair defects underlie paclitaxel and cisplatin resistance.

Methods

Thirty-four patients with primary ovarian carcinomas (26 serous and eight clear cell carcinomas) treated with paclitaxel/cisplatin were analysed. TUBB exon 4 was analysed by nested PCR after a first round PCR using intronic primers. Microsatellite analysis was performed with the quasimonomorphic markers BAT 26 and BAT 34.

Results

Twenty-two of the 34 ovarian cancers (64.7%) presented residual tumour after surgery, seven of which (7/22; 31.8%) were shown to be chemoresistant (five serous and two clear cell tumours). Sequence analysis did not find any mutation in TUBB exon 4. Microsatellite instability was not detected in any of the ovarian carcinomas.

Conclusion

We conclude that TUBB exon 4 mutations and mismatch repair defects do not play a significant role in paclitaxel/cisplatin resistance.

Resistance to the Tubulin-Binding Agents in Renal Cell Carcinoma: No Mutations in the Class Iβ-TubulinGene but Changes in Tubulin Isotype Protein Expression

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether mutations of the class I beta-tubulin gene may be implicated in the inherent resistance to tubulin-binding agents (TBA) in renal cancer, with a small number of samples and cell lines also being examined for class I and III beta-tubulin isotype protein expression.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

DNA was extracted from 90 renal tumors and the class I beta-tubulin gene analyzed for mutations. For each sample, eight PCRs were used to cover the complete coding sequence with intronic primers ensuring highly homologous pseudogenes were not coamplified. Additionally, expression levels of class I and III beta-tubulin isotypes in 17 matched normal and malignant renal samples and a panel of renal cell carcinoma cell lines with differing intrinsic resistance to the TBAs was examined by Western blotting.

RESULTS

Four polymorphic sequence changes of the class I beta-tubulin gene were identified with no mutations. Class I protein expression levels were higher in tumor tissue versus normal tissue, whereas class III expression showed no consistent change. In renal cancer cell lines, a significant correlation between class III isotype expression and vinblastine sensitivity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support a role for mutations in the class I beta-tubulin gene in the intrinsic resistance of renal cancer to TBAs. Class III isotype expression may be implicated in resistance in vitro but in vivo, changes in class I isotype expression in renal cell carcinoma tissue may support a role in resistance to the TBAs and warrants further investigation.

Class III β-Tubulin Overexpression Is a Prominent Mechanism of Paclitaxel Resistance in Ovarian Cancer Patients

The vast majority of women with advanced ovarian cancer will ultimately relapse and develop a drug-resistant disease with an overall 5-year survival of &lt;50%. Unfortunately, the mechanisms of drug resistance actually operating in patients are still unknown. To address this issue, in 41 patients affected by advanced ovarian cancer the three main mechanisms of paclitaxel resistance were investigated: overexpression of MDR-1 gene, point mutations at prominently expressed α-tubulin and β-tubulin genes and selective alterations in the expression of β-tubulin isotypes. MDR-1 and the β-tubulin isotypes expression were evaluated by semiquantitative and real-time PCR. On the same specimens, quantitative immunohistochemistry was also done in the tumor area. No statistically significant changes of MDR-1 expression were noticed between the sensitive and resistant patients either at the mRNA or protein level. The tubulin mutations for the ubiquitous α-tubulin and β-tubulin genes were evaluated by automated DNA sequencing, and in all patients, no mutations were detected in both resistant and sensitive cases. With regard to the expression of tubulin isoforms, a statistically significant up-regulation of class III β-tubulin was found in the resistant subset. It is worth noting that this statistically significant increase of the expression of class III β-tubulin was detectable at the mRNA and protein level. By a direct comparison of the three main known mechanisms of paclitaxel resistance, this study indicates that overexpression of class III β-tubulin is the most prominent mechanism of paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer.

Microtubule-targeted anticancer agents and apoptosis

Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the biology of microtubule (MT) assembly into the mitotic spindle during mitosis and the molecular signaling and execution of the various pathways to apoptosis. In the same period, the microtubule-targeted tubulin-polymerizing agents (MTPAs), notably paclitaxel and taxotere, have come to occupy a central role in the treatment of a variety of human epithelial cancers. Following their binding to B-tubulin, MTPAs inhibit MT dynamic instability, cell cycle G2/M phase transition and mitotic arrest of cancer cells. MTPA-induced anti-MT and cell cycle effects trigger the molecular signaling for the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. This triggering is orchestrated through different molecular links and determined by the threshold for apoptosis that is set and controlled diversely in various cancer types. The complexity and regulatory potential of the links and the apoptosis threshold are integral to the transformed biology of the cancer cell. The emerging understanding of this biology and how it is influenced by treatment with MTPAs has highlighted novel strategies to further enhance the antitumor activity and overcome resistance to MTPA-induced apoptosis in cancer cells.