Can patients with chronic neuropathic pain be cured by acute administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine?

Evaluation of the Therapeutic Potential of Amantadine in a Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Model in Rats

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of amantadine in a vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy model in rats. Forty-eight male Wistar rats were used. The treated groups received oral amantadine at doses of 2, 5, 12, 25 and 50 mg/kg, with daily applications for 14 days. The mechanical paw withdrawal threshold was measured using a digital analgesimeter. Immunohistochemical analysis of IL-6, TNFα, MIP1α, IL-10, CX3CR1, CXCR4, SOD, CAT and GPx, and enzymatic activity analysis of CAT, SOD and GPx were performed, in addition to quantitative PCR of Grp78, Chop, Ho1, Perk, Bax, Bcl-xL, Casp 3, Casp 9, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18 and IL-1β. The results showed an increase in nociceptive thresholds in animals that received 25 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg amantadine. Immunohistochemistry showed a decrease in the immunostaining of IL-6, TNFα, MIP1α and CX3CR1, and an increase in IL-10. CAT and SOD showed an increase in both immunochemistry and enzymatic analysis. qPCR revealed a reduced expression of genes related to endoplasmic reticulum stress and regulation in the expression of immunological and apoptotic markers. Amantadine demonstrated antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in the vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy model in rats, suggesting that amantadine may be considered an alternative approach for the treatment of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

The physiopathology and neurotransmission of pain are of an owe inspiring complexity. Our ability to satisfactorily suppress neuropathic or other forms of chronic pain is limited. The number of pharmacodynamically distinct and clinically available medications is low and the successes achieved modest. Pain Medicine practitioners are confronted with the ethical dichotomy imposed by Hippocrates: On one hand the mandate of primum non nocere, on the other hand, the promise of heavenly joys if successful divinum est opus sedare dolorem. We briefly summarize the concepts associated with nociceptive pain from nociceptive input (afferents from periphery), modulatory output [descending noradrenergic (NE) and serotoninergic (5-HT) fibers] to local control. The local control is comprised of the "inflammatory soup" at the site of pain origin and synaptic relay stations, with an ATP-rich environment promoting inflammation and nociception while an adenosine-rich environment having the opposite effect. Subsequently, we address the transition from nociceptor pain to neuropathic pain (independent of nociceptor activation) and the process of sensitization and pain chronification (transient pain progressing into persistent pain). Having sketched a model of pain perception and processing we attempt to identify the sites and modes of action of clinically available drugs used in chronic pain treatment, focusing on adjuvant (co-analgesic) medication.

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 5th Edition

There have been some modest recent advancements in the research of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, yet the amount and quality of the work in this complicated multifactorial disease remains low (with some notable exceptions; e.g., the recent work on the dorsal root ganglion stimulation). The semi-systematic (though in some cases narrative) approach to review is necessary so that we might treat our patients while waiting for "better research." This semi-systematic review was conducted by experts in the field, (deliberately) some of whom are promising young researchers supplemented by the experience of "elder statesman" researchers, who all mention the system they have used to examine the literature. What we found is generally low- to medium-quality research with small numbers of subjects; however, there are some recent exceptions to this. The primary reason for this paucity of research is the fact that this is a rare disease, and it is very difficult to acquire a sufficient sample size for statistical significance using traditional statistical approaches. Several larger trials have failed, probably due to using the broad general diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest" criteria) in a multifactorial/multi-mechanism disease. Responsive subsets can often be identified in these larger trials, but not sufficient to achieve statistically significant results in the general diagnostic grouping. This being the case the authors have necessarily included data from less compelling protocols, including trials such as case series and even in some instances case reports/empirical information. In the humanitarian spirit of treating our often desperate patients with this rare syndrome, without great evidence, we must take what data we can find (as in this work) and tailor a treatment regime for each patient.

Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 4th edition

OBJECTIVE

This is the fourth edition of diagnostic and treatment guidelines for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS; aka reflex sympathetic dystrophy).

METHODS

Expert practitioners in each discipline traditionally utilized in the treatment of CRPS systematically reviewed the available and relevant literature; due to the paucity of levels 1 and 2 studies, less rigorous, preliminary research reports were included. The literature review was supplemented with knowledge gained from extensive empirical clinical experience, particularly in areas where high-quality evidence to guide therapy is lacking.

RESULTS

The research quality, clinical relevance, and "state of the art" of diagnostic criteria or treatment modalities are discussed, sometimes in considerable detail with an eye to the expert practitioner in each therapeutic area. Levels of evidence are mentioned when available, so that the practitioner can better assess and analyze the modality under discussion, and if desired, to personally consider the citations. Tables provide details on characteristics of studies in different subject domains described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

In the humanitarian spirit of making the most of all current thinking in the area, balanced by a careful case-by-case analysis of the risk/cost vs benefit analysis, the authors offer these "practical" guidelines.

Chronic pain and opiates: a call for moderation

The prescription of opioid analgesics for chronic, nonterminal conditions continues as one of the most controversial and contentious issues in medicine. We have witnessed a full pendulum swing from the complete nihilism of the 1960s and 1970s to the careless zealotry of the 1990s. Neither extreme is good practice, and one hopes we are witnessing the dawn of a more moderate time of a sane and balanced appraisal of risk versus benefit in using these important tools.

OVERALL ARTICLE OBJECTIVE

To present the case for thoughtful attention and moderation in prescribing opioids to treat chronic pain conditions.

Low dose ketamine: a therapeutic and research tool to explore N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated plasticity in pain pathways

Ketamine is a dissociative anaesthetic that has been used in the clinic for many years. At low, sub-anaesthetic doses, it is a relatively selective and potent antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. It belongs to the class of uncompetitive antagonists and blocks the receptor by binding to a specific site within the NMDA receptor channel when it is open. Like other compounds of this class, ketamine can cause hallucinations or other untoward central effects which limit its use in the clinic. Nevertheless, because of the evidence on the importance of NMDA receptor-mediated pLasticity in chronic pain, low doses of ketamine have been explored in a wide range of pain conditions. The majority of studies with ketamine have shown efficacy; however, it has not been possible to separate safely the pain relief from the side effects of the drug. Hence, clinical use of ketamine as a pain treatment is very limited. Nevertheless, ketamine has served as a useful tool to provide a compelling rationale for developing other NMDA antagonists. Some of the new compounds of this class, particularly those acting at the NR2B subtype of the NMDA receptor, have shown promise in preclinical and clinical studies.

The antiallodynic effect of NMDA antagonists in neuropathic pain outlasts the duration of the in vivo NMDA antagonism

Clinical reports have described a long-lasting relief in neuropathic pain patients treated with NMDA receptor antagonists; it is unclear, however, what mediates this effect. In this work, we have used two NMDA antagonists of different class to investigate if the antiallodynic effects in a rat neuropathy model can outlast their in vivo NMDA antagonism. Both the uncompetitive NMDA antagonist ketamine and the glycine(B) antagonist MRZ 2/576 inhibited neuronal responses to iontophoretic NMDA in anaesthetised rats with the time course consistent with their known pharmacokinetics (t(1/2) approximately 10-12min, similar in control and nerve-injured rats). Surprisingly, the antiallodynic effects of the same doses of the NMDA antagonists in the neuropathic pain model were long-lasting (>3h with ketamine, >24h with MRZ 2/576). The effect of ketamine was further prolonged (>24h) when combined with a short-acting opioid, fentanyl, which only produced a short effect ( approximately 40min) when given alone. The duration of centrally mediated side effects of ketamine and MRZ 2/576 was short, similar to the in vivo NMDA antagonism. We speculate that NMDA receptor blockade may down-regulate the central sensitisation triggered by nerve injury, resulting in a long-lasting antiallodynic effect. Development of short-acting NMDA antagonists could represent a strategy for improving their tolerability.

Adjuvant Analgesics in Cancer Pain Management

Adjuvant analgesics are defined as drugs with a primary indication other than pain that have analgesic properties in some painful conditions. The group includes numerous drugs in diverse classes. Although the widespread use of these drugs as first-line agents in chronic nonmalignant pain syndromes suggests that the term "adjuvant" is a misnomer, they usually are combined with a less-than-satisfactory opioid regimen when administered for cancer pain. Some adjuvant analgesics are useful in several painful conditions and are described as multipurpose adjuvant analgesics (antidepressants, corticosteroids, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists, neuroleptics), whereas others are specific for neuropathic pain (anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists), bone pain (calcitonin, bisphosphonates, radiopharmaceuticals), musculoskeletal pain (muscle relaxants), or pain from bowel obstruction (octreotide, anticholinergics). This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of each class of adjuvant analgesic for the treatment of pain in cancer patients and provides a comprehensive outline of dosing recommendations, side effects, and drug interactions.

Dopamine and NMDA systems modulate long-term nociception in the rat anterior cingulate cortex

The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a key role in pain processing. It has been reported that increased activity of glutamatergic projections into the ACC intensifies nociception; whereas dopaminergic projections inhibit it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of dopaminergic and NMDA systems of the ACC in the modulation of long-term nociception elicited by sciatic denervation in the rat. Score, onset and incidence of long-term nociception were measured by the autotomy behavior. The effects of a single microinjection into the ACC of different doses of dopamine (100 nM, 100 microM and 100 mM), a NMDA receptor antagonist (MK801 200 nM and 9.34 mM) and amantadine, a dopamine agonist and NMDA receptor antagonist (10, 100 and 1000 microM) were tested on long-term nociception. Dopamine diminished autotomy behavior in an inverse dose-dependent manner, with dopamine 100 nM as most effective concentration. MK801 and amantadine elicited a significant reduction on autotomy score. Prior injections of D1 and D2 receptor antagonists blocked the antinociceptive effects of amantadine on long-term nociceptive behavior. The present study suggests an interaction between dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems within the ACC in the genesis and maintenance of long-term nociception.

Attenuation of mechanical allodynia by clinically utilized drugs in a rat chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain model

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common, dose-limiting side effect of cancer chemotherapeutic agents, including the vinca alkaloids such as vincristine. The resulting symptoms, which frequently include moderate to severe pain, can often be disabling. The current study utilized a vincristine-induced neuropathic pain animal model [Pain 93 (2001) 69], in which rats were surgically implanted with mini-osmotic pumps set to deliver vincristine sulfate (30 microg kg(-1)day(-1), i.v.), to examine the time course of progression of various pain modalities and to compare the dose-response effects of clinically utilized drugs on mechanical allodynia to further validate the relevance of this model to clinical pathology. Vincristine infusion resulted in significant cold allodynia after 1 week post-infusion, however mechanical and thermal nociception showed little to no effect. In contrast, marked mechanical allodynia occurred by 1 week of vincristine infusion and returned nearly to pre-infusion levels by the 4th week after infusion pump implantation. ED(50) values (micromol/kg, p.o.) were determined in the mechanical allodynia assay for lamotrigine (82), dextromethorphan (94), gabapentin (400), acetaminophen (1100) and carbamazepine (3600); however, aspirin and ibuprofen had no effects up to 300 and 1000 micromol/kg, respectively. Additionally, ED(50) values (micromol/kg, i.p.) were determined in the mechanical allodynia assay for clonidine (0.35) and morphine (0.62), but desipramine and celecoxib had no effects up to 66 and 260 micromol/kg, respectively. Findings from the current, preclinical study further validate this model as clinically relevant for chemotherapy-induced pain. The surprisingly good effects observed with acetaminophen warrant further investigation of its mechanism(s) of action in neuropathic pain.

Agmatine attenuates neuropathic pain in rats: possible mediation of nitric oxide and noradrenergic activity in the brainstem and cerebellum

Effect of agmatine (10-400 mg/kg) on neuropathic pain in a rat model produced by loose ligatures around the common sciatic nerve was studied. The involvement of possible alterations in nitric oxide (NO) levels [measured as its stable metabolites nitrate + nitrite] and in noradrenergic activity [measured as norepinephrine and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethylene glycol (MHPG) levels] in this effect was also investigated biochemically in the brainstem and cerebellum. Agmatine increased the neuropathic pain threshold at 300 and 400 mg/kg. There was almost a twofold increase in nitrate + nitrite levels in the brainstem and cerebellum of the rats with neuropathic pain and agmatine decreased the high nitrate + nitrite levels only in the brainstem at 300 mg/kg and both in the brainstem and cerebellum at 400 mg/kg. Ligation of sciatic nerve resulted in almost twofold increase in norepinephrine and MHPG levels only in the brainstem of the rats. Agmatine decreased MHPG levels at 300 and 400 mg/kg, however it decreased norepinephrine levels only at the higher dose. These findings indicate that agmatine decreases neuropathic pain, an effect which may involve the reduction of NO levels and noradrenergic activity in the brain.

Efficacy of the NMDA-receptor antagonist memantine in patients with chronic phantom limb pain--results of a randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Phantom limb pain (PLP) associated neuroplastic changes are partly mediated by excitatory amino acids at NMDA receptor sites. This study was undertaken to deduce if NMDA-receptor antagonists may be effective in patients with chronic PLP. Therefore a four week double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of 30 mg memantine/day, an orally administrable NMDA receptor antagonist.Thirty-six patients, 18 per group, with a history of at least 12 months PLP and an average pain of at least 4 on the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) were enrolled. The patients completed a standardized questionnaire before the trial. PLP intensity and the level of eight complaints were assessed during the trial. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated based on the average PLP during the 3rd week (steady state). In both groups, PLP declined significantly in comparison with the baseline (verum: 5.1 (+/-2.1) to 3,8 (+/-2,3), placebo from 5.1 (+/-2.0) to 3.2 (+/-1,46) NRS) without a re-rising of the PLP during the washout period. Mean pain relief was 47% in the memantine group (10 patients reported more than 50% relief), 40% in the placebo group (6>50%): NNT were 4.5 (KI: 2.1-10.6). Analysis of covariance demonstrated a significant impact only on the prior PLP intensity, but no treatment effect. Two patients have demonstrated long-term pain relief under memantine until now (16 months). The total number of slight adverse events were comparable in both groups, but the overall number of severe events was higher in the memantine group (P<0.05). This trial failed to demonstrate a significant clinical benefit of the NMDA-receptor antagonist memantine in chronic PLP. The administration of a higher dosage is probably not tolerable.

Dextromethorphan mitigates phantom pain in cancer amputees

BACKGROUND

Hyperexcitability of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors may play a role in the persistence of phantom pain. Dextromethorphan (DM) blocks NMDA receptors.

METHODS

Eight cancer and two noncancer amputees with established, disabling phantom pain received oral DM 60 or 90 mg twice daily (BID) in a three-period double-blind crossover placebo-controlled trial. This followed an open-phase trial in which either dose was given three times daily if pain relief during the double-blind phase was <50% of pretreatment intensity. Patients then underwent a 3-month phase of treatment with the best regimen and a subsequent 1-month posttreatment follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients reported a >50% decrease in pain intensity, better mood, and lower sedation in each treatment phase. Four individuals reported this level of pain relief with the 60-mg and one with the 90-mg BID regimen during the double-blind phase, whereas two amputees benefited from the 60-mg and three from the 90-mg thrice-daily regimen in the open-phase trial. One reported exacerbation of pain with the 90-mg BID regimen, and three reported pain rebound at the 1-month posttreatment follow-up phase. Three patients stopped all previous analgesic use during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent phantom pain probably involves NMDA receptor hyperexcitability because DM 120 to 270 mg/day mitigated the pain satisfactorily.

Rapid increase of morphine and benzodiazepine usage in the last three days of life in children with cancer is related to neuropathic pain

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that children with terminal cancer and neuropathic pain require rapid increases of opioids and benzodiazepines immediately before death, we compared drug usage in the last 72 hours of life in children with and without neuropathic pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Through the use of retrospective case analysis, pediatric patients with terminal cancer were divided into two groups: one with and one without neuropathic pain. Opioid and benzodiazepine dosages were recorded during the last 3 days of life.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were identified: 12 with neuropathic pain and 6 without neuropathic pain. In the neuropathic group, the average dose of morphine 72 hours before death was 231 mg/kg per day and increased to 380 mg/kg per day on the day of death (P =.009). The average benzodiazepine dosage 72 hours before death was 6.0 mg/kg per day and increased to 25.0 mg/kg per day on the day of death (P =.018). In the nonneuropathic pain group, the average dose of morphine and benzodiazepine 72 hours before death was 3.0 mg/kg per day and 0.08 mg/kg per day, respectively, and did not increase substantially on the day of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Dying children with cancer and neuropathic pain have higher baseline requirements of morphine and benzodiazepines and require rapid increases of both drugs in the last 72 hours of life than dying children without neuropathic pain.

A pilot study of the beneficial effects of amantadine in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Current symptomatic treatments for painful peripheral neuropathy in diabetes have variable efficacy in individual patients. Amongst other chemical transmitters involved in pain reception, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of excitatory amino acid receptor is involved in nociception. Amantadine was recently shown to act as a non-competitive antagonist of NMDA and may be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. We have looked at the benefit of amantadine infusion in diabetic patients with painful peripheral neuropathy.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with diabetes (nine men) completed this double-blind randomized crossover placebo-controlled trial of intravenous amantadine. The average age was 58.4 (sd 11) years, with duration of diabetes of 21.1 (8.7) years and duration of painful peripheral neuropathy symptoms of 29.1 (24) months. All analgesics except paracetamol were stopped for 4 weeks prior to the study. Infusions were carried out on a weekly basis with amantadine being administered intravenously as a single 200-mg infusion. The Neuropathy Symptom Score (NSS), together with visual analogue scales, were used to assess current pain intensity (VAS-P) pre-therapy and 1 week later VAS-P was repeated together with a visual analogue scale used to assess relief in pain (VAS-R) and the Physicians Global Evaluation (PGE) score used to assess response to therapy.

RESULTS

Pre-therapy, the NSS was 6.8 (6.3-7.4) at baseline, remaining unchanged at 6.6 (5.8-7.4) after placebo (P = 0.33), but fell to 4.6 (3.4-5.8) after amantadine (P = 0.003 vs. baseline and P = 0.02 vs. placebo). The baseline perception of pain was scored as 7.8 cm (7.3-8.3), with no difference following placebo, at 8.2 cm (7.7-8.6) (P = 0.34), but following amantadine it fell to 6.2 cm (4.9-7.8) (P = 0.01 compared with pre-therapy, P = 0.003 compared with placebo). The perception of relief from pain following placebo was only 0.2 (-0.2 to +0.6) but following amantadine was 10-fold better at 1.9 (0.8-3.1) (P = 0.016). The PGE assessment of pain relief was -0.3 (-0.5 to 0) for placebo and following amantadine was 0.8 (0.1-1.5) (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that intravenous amantadine is beneficial in reducing the pain of painful peripheral neuropathy, with an effect sustained for at least 1 week after an infusion.

Modulation of defensive behavior by periaqueductal gray NMDA/glycine-B receptor

Glutamate (GLU) associated with glycine, act as co-transmitter at the N-methyl-D-aspartate/glycine-B (NMDA/GLY(B)) receptor. Dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) neurons express NMDA/GLY(B) receptors suggesting a GLU physiological role in mediating the responses elicited by stimulation of this area. Immunohistochemical data provided evidence of a possible correlation among elevated plus-maze (EPM), fear-like defensive behavior, and dPAG activity. The present data show that whereas the NMDA/GLY(B) receptor agonists increased the open-arm avoidance responses in the EPM, the antagonists had the opposite effects. Microinjection of NMDA/GLY(B) receptor agonists within the dPAG during test sessions in the EPM resulted in an enduring learned fear response detected in the retest. Therefore, in addition to the proposed role for the dPAG in panic attacks (escape), these findings suggest that the dPAG can also participate in more subtle anxiety-like behaviors.

How REM sleep deprivation and amantadine affects male rat sexual behavior

There are conflicting findings about the sexual effects of REM sleep deprivation (REMd). Otherwise, several studies show a dopaminergic hypersensitivity after REMd. The effect of REMd and amantadine (AMA) was studied for standard measures and temporal patterning in the first experiment, in four groups: normal with vehicle, normal with AMA (5.0 and 10 mg/kg), REMd with vehicle and REMd with AMA (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg). REMd reduced mount latency (ML), intromission latency (IL) and mount number (MN) and increased copulatory efficiency (CE) and hit rate factor. REMd also reduced the mount bout number (MBN) and increased the sexual interaction (mount bout time, MBT) among male and female during copula. AMA stimulates initiation and hit rate factors and accelerates the temporal patterning of sexual behavior, evoking fewer and quicker mount bouts. In the experiments with combination of REMd and AMA administration, AMA did not increase behavior effects evoked by REM deprivation, probably due to a top or a bottom effect, depending on the measures considered. A second experiment studied the effects of AMA (1.25 to 5.0 mg/kg) and REMd on the sexual reflexes of nonimmobilized male rats. REMd enhanced the AMA effects upon the seminal emission reflex, but inhibited the penile erection reflex elicited by 1.25 mg/kg of AMA. Curiously, our results showed that REMd, like AMA, a dopaminergic agonist, causes similar effects of sexual behavior in the male rat, particularly those related to arousal mechanism and hit rate factor. The results are discussed and the effects of REMd probably involve dopaminergic hypersensitivity and increased sexual motivational response.

Glutamate receptors and nociception: implications for the drug treatment of pain

Evidence from the last several decades indicates that the excitatory amino acid glutamate plays a significant role in nociceptive processing. Glutamate and glutamate receptors are located in areas of the brain, spinal cord and periphery that are involved in pain sensation and transmission. Glutamate acts at several types of receptors, including ionotropic (directly coupled to ion channels) and metabotropic (directly coupled to intracellular second messengers). Ionotropic receptors include those selectively activated by N-methyl-D-aspartate, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid and kainate. Metabotropic glutamate receptors are classified into 3 groups based on sequence homology, signal transduction mechanisms and receptor pharmacology. Glutamate also interacts with the opioid system, and intrathecal or systemic coadministration of glutamate receptor antagonists with opioids may enhance analgesia while reducing the development of opioid tolerance and dependence. The actions of glutamate in the brain seem to be more complex. Activation of glutamate receptors in some brain areas seems to be pronociceptive (e.g. thalamus, trigeminal nucleus), although activation of glutamate receptors in other brain areas seems to be antinociceptive (e.g. periaqueductal grey, ventrolateral medulla). Application of glutamate, or agonists selective for one of the several types of glutamate receptor, to the spinal cord or periphery induces nociceptive behaviours. Inhibition of glutamate release, or of glutamate receptors, in the spinal cord or periphery attenuates both acute and chronic pain in animal models. Similar benefits have been seen in studies involving humans (both patients and volunteers); however, results have been inconsistent. More research is needed to clearly define the role of existing treatment options and explore the possibilities for future drug development.

The pharmacological basis of contemporary pain management

Pain management has become an increasingly well researched area in medicine over recent years, and there have been advances in a number of areas. While opioids remain an integral part of pain-management strategies, there is now an emphasis on the use of adjuvant drugs, such as paracetamol and anti-inflammatory agents, which through physiological or pharmacological synergism, both enhance pain control and reduce opioid use. The management of neuropathic pain continues to be a challenge. Anti-epileptics and antidepressants, together with clonidine and ketamine, provide the foundations for treatment. Another area of interest has been the widespread use of patient-controlled analgesia and the administration of some drugs, especially opioids, by means other than traditional oral and parenteral routes. The number of new drugs that have reached the stage of clinical trials has been small, yet they offer exciting possibilities. The epibatidine analogue ABT-594 and zinconitide both offer novel approaches to the management of neuropathic pain states, while selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and nitroaspirins may see advances in the management of nociceptive pain states.

Targeting the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for chronic pain management. Preclinical animal studies, recent clinical experience and future research directions

A 1967-1999 MEDLINE search of published reports evaluating the role of the glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in pain identified 378 animal studies and 132 human studies. There is convincing evidence in these studies that the NMDA receptor mediates prolonged nociceptive behaviors in animal models and various chronic pain symptoms in the clinical population. Administration of older compounds, such as ketamine, dextromethorphan, and amantadine, which are now known to act as NMDA receptor antagonists, have recently been shown to alleviate chronic pain. For years, the pharmaceutical industry has been attempting to produce novel compounds that modulate NMDA receptor activity; however, the adverse effects associated with this class of drugs have prevented their widespread clinical use. Collaborative studies between basic researchers, clinical scientists, and clinicians are needed to delineate characteristics of NMDA receptor antagonism that predict optimal analgesic activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with chronic pain.

The role of dextromethorphan in pain control

PURPOSE

To review the clinical benefits of dextromethorphan (DM) in pain management, describe its neuropharmacological properties.

SOURCE

A Medline search was made for experimental and clinical data on DM use from 1967 to date using keywords nociception, acute and chronic pain control, N-methyl-D-aspartate, antagonists, dextromethorphan.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

The 930 DM citations mostly described its antitussive, metabolic and toxicological aspects, animal studies and its possible role in minimizing post-brain ischemia complications in humans. The use of DM in acute pain revealed eight original studies involving 443 patients, as well as two preliminary reports and our own unpublished data on 513 patients. Most of the 956 patients had general anesthesia. Eight studies (154 patients) and one case report dealt with chronic pain management. This N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist binds to receptor sites in the spinal cord and central nervous system, thereby blocking the generation of central acute and chronic pain sensations arising from peripheral nociceptive stimuli and enabling reduction in the amount of analgesics required for pain control. DM attenuated the sensation of acute pain at doses of 30-90 mg, without major side effects, and reduced the amount of analgesics in 73% of the postoperative DM-treated patients. Studies in secondary pain models in healthy volunteers and in various types of chronic pain showed DM to be associated with unsatisfactory pain relief.

CONCLUSION

DM attenuates acute pain sensation with tolerable side effects. Its availability in oral form bestow advantages over other NMDA antagonists.

Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: an update

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a chronic pain syndrome that is often refractory to treatment and can last for years, causing physical and social disability, psychological distress, and increased use of the healthcare system. In this paper we provide an update on recent developments in the treatment of PHN. We emphasise the results of recent studies that provide an evidence-based approach for treating PHN that was not available until very recently. In randomised, controlled clinical trials, the topical lidocaine patch, gabapentin, and controlled release oxycodone have been shown to provide superior pain relief in patients with PHN when compared with placebo. It has also recently been demonstrated that the tricyclic antidepressant nortriptyline provides equivalent analgesic benefit when compared with amitriptyline, but is better tolerated. Based on these results, nortriptyline can now be considered the preferred antidepressant for the treatment of PHN, although desipramine may be used if the patient experiences unacceptable sedation from nortriptyline. The topical lidocaine patch, gabapentin and controlled release oxycodone all appear to be as effective as tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of patients with PHN, and the results of these recent studies suggest that each of these treatments should be considered early in the course of treatment. Additional controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of these 4 treatments- tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, the topical lidocaine patch and controlled release opioid analgesics--used singly and in various combinations in the treatment of patients with PHN.

Excitatory amino acid agonists and antagonists: pharmacology and therapeutic applications

Glutamic acid is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS). Specific receptors bind glutamate and some of these when activated open an integral ion channel and are thus known as ionotropic receptors. Within the ionotropic family of glutamate receptors, three major subtypes have been identified using classical specific agonist activation, selective competitive antagonists together with their structural heterogeneity. These receptors have thus been named N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) and kainate receptors. The NMDA receptor has sites in addition to its agonist-binding site and these seem to either positively or negatively modulate the agonist effect. The NMDA receptor also is unique in that another amino acid, glycine, acts as a co-agonist with glutamate. Changes in glutamate transmission have been associated with a number of CNS pathologies; these include, acute stroke, chronic neurodegeneration, chronic pain, depression, drug dependency, epilepsy, Parkinson's Disease and schizophrenia.

The NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine reduces surgical neuropathic pain in cancer patients: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial

Neuropathic pain is often severe, persistent, and responds poorly to analgesic medications. Recent evidence suggests that N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may be effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain. The present trial was designed to test the efficacy of acute administration of the NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine in relieving surgical neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. The study sample consisted of 15 cancer patients with the diagnosis of surgical neuropathic pain. Two 500 ml infusions of either 200 mg amantadine or placebo were administered over a 3 h period, in a randomized order, 1 week apart from each other. Spontaneous and evoked pain were measured for 48 h before treatment, during treatment, and for 48 h following treatment. An average pain reduction of 85% was recorded at the end of amantadine infusion vs. 45% following placebo administration. The difference in pain relief between the two treatments was statistically significant (P = 0.009). Mean pain intensity remained significantly lower during the 48 h following amantadine treatment as compared with the 48 h prior to treatment (31% reduction; P = 0.006), whereas no such effect was found with the placebo (6% reduction; P = 0.40). Amantadine, but not the placebo, also reduced 'wind up' like pain (caused by repeated pinpricking) in four patients. We conclude that amantadine infusion is a safe and effective acute treatment for surgical neuropathic pain in cancer patients. Further trials with long-term oral or parenteral amantadine treatment should be conducted.