Atypical antipsychotics in the EPS-vulnerable patient

What drugs modify the risk of iatrogenic impulse-control disorders in Parkinson's disease? A preliminary pharmacoepidemiologic study

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with pramipexole (PPX) and ropinirole (ROP) exhibit a higher risk of developing impulse control disorders (ICDs), including gambling disorder, compulsive shopping, and hypersexuality. The management of ICDs in PD is challenging, due to the limited availability of effective therapeutic alternatives or counteractive strategies. Here, we used a pharmacoepidemiological approach to verify whether the risk for PPX/ROP-associated ICDs in PD patients was reduced by drugs that have been posited to exert therapeutic effects on idiopathic ICDs-including atypical antipsychotics (AAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and glutamatergic modulators (GMs).

METHODS

To quantify the strength of the associations between PPX/ROP and other medications with respect to ICD risk, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, gender, marital status race, psychiatric comorbidities, and use of cabergoline and levodopa.

RESULTS

A total of 935 patients were included in the analysis. Use of GMs, SSRIs, and AAs was not associated with a decreased ICD risk in PD patients treated with PPX/ROP; conversely, ICD risk was significantly increased in patients treated with either GMs (Adjusted Odds Ratio, ORa: 14.00 [3.58-54.44]) or SSRIs (ORa: 3.67 [1.07-12.59]). Results were inconclusive for AAs, as available data were insufficient to compute a reliable ORa.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that some of the key pharmacological strategies used to treat idiopathic ICD may not be effective for ICDs associated with PPX and ROP in PD patients. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm, validate, and extend these findings.

[Antipsychotic-induced tardive syndromes]

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) remains a relevant clinical problem despite the increasing use of new-generation antipsychotics. Antipsychotic-induced tardive syndromes are difficult to treat and have a low tendency of remission. Therefore, prophylaxis is of utmost importance, with the responsible use of antipsychotics as a prime desideratum. With respect to managing tardive dyskinesia, discontinuing the antipsychotic, if possible, albeit not backed up by unequivocal evidence, is still the main recommendation. If this is not possible, the switch to an antipsychotic with a lower TD risk is the next-preferred option. Other symptomatic treatments have been explored, but clinical trials have provided inhomogeneous results and only very few compounds are approved for the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. This manuscript summarizes the current evidence with respect to the phenomenology, course, prevention and treatment of tardive syndromes.

Drug-Induced Movement Disorders

Drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs) pose a significant burden to patients, often resulting in nonadherence, disease relapse, and decreased quality of life. Dopamine-receptor blocking agents such as conventional antipsychotics (eg, haloperidol and chlorpromazine) and antiemetics (eg, metoclopramide and prochlorperazine) are most commonly implicated. DIMDs can be categorized by the onset of symptoms: acute reactions occurring hours to days after exposure, subacute DIMDs appearing within weeks, and tardive occurring months to years after drug exposure. The DIMDs of akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, dystonia, and parkinsonism are reviewed. Their epidemiology, mechanism, clinical presentation and differential diagnosis, risk factors, morbidity and mortality, and prevention and management are discussed. For many of these disorders, treatment inconsistently provides benefit, and therefore, primary prevention is essential. Clinicians and other healthcare professionals play a key role in the identification of patients with DIMDs, or those at risk, and in implementing prevention and treatment plans.

Drug-induced movement disorders

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced movement disorders (DIMDs) can be elicited by several kinds of pharmaceutical agents. The major groups of offending drugs include antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, antimicrobials, antiarrhythmics, mood stabilisers and gastrointestinal drugs among others.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews literature covering each movement disorder induced by commercially available pharmaceuticals. Considering the magnitude of the topic, only the most prominent examples of offending agents were reported in each paragraph paying a special attention to the brief description of the pathomechanism and therapeutic options if available.

EXPERT OPINION

As the treatment of some DIMDs is quite challenging, a preventive approach is preferable. Accordingly, the use of the offending agents should be strictly limited to appropriate indications and they should be applied in as low doses and as short duration as the patient's condition allows. As most of DIMDs are related to an unspecific adverse action of medications in the basal ganglia and the cerebellum, future research should focus on better characterisation of the neurochemical profile of the affected functional systems, in addition to the development of drugs with higher selectivity and better side-effect profile.

Drug-induced parkinsonism

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is the second most common cause of parkinsonism after idiopathic Parkinson's disease (iPD). Initially reported as a complication of antipsychotics, it was later recognized as a common complication of antidepressants, calcium channel antagonists, gastrointestinal prokinetics, antiepileptic drugs and many other compounds. Despite being a major health problem in certain populations, it seems to be frequently overlooked by the medical community.

AREAS COVERED

This paper approaches the concept of DIP, reviews its epidemiology, clinical features and ancillary tests recommended for a correct diagnosis. The authors discuss the different drugs and its pathogenic mechanisms. The relevance of an early recognition and recommendations for a correct management are commented.

EXPERT OPINION

Prescribers need to remain vigilant for DIP, particularly in the elderly, patients taking multiple drugs and those with genetic risk factors involved in iPD. Cessation of the causing agent is the main treatment and there is no evidence of benefit for the use of anticholinergics or levodopa. If the medication cannot be withdrawn, it should be switched to agents with a lower risk of DIP.

Pimavanserin tartrate: a 5-HT2A inverse agonist with potential for treating various neuropsychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND

Pimavanserin tartrate is the first 5-HT(2A) inverse agonist to enter clinical trials as a treatment for L-dopa-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease and for augmentation of low-dose risperidone treatment in schizophrenia. Pimavanserin is also being evaluated as a possible anti-insomnia drug.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the potential of pimavanserin to fill multiple therapeutic needs.

METHODS

The problems with currently approved antipsychotics and sleep agents are explored to highlight how pimavanserin might address some longstanding issues in the treatment of psychosis and insomnia.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

In Phase II clinical trials, pimavanserin seemed to be safe, well-tolerated and efficacious in treating L-dopa-induced psychosis without worsening motor symptoms. Pimavanserin also potentiated the therapeutic effects of low-dose risperidone, reduced haloperidol-induced akathisia, and increased slow-wave sleep in older individuals.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with typical antipsychotics has limitations: 25 to 33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine compared with typical antipsychotic drugs in people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the current update of this review (March 2006) we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We have included 42 trials (3950 participants) in this review. Twenty-eight of the included studies are less than 13 weeks in duration, and, overall, trials were at significant risk of bias. We found no significant difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at the end of the study. Clinical improvements were seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (n=1119, 14 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.7 to 0.8, NNT 6 CI 5 to 8). Also, participants given clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (n=1303, RR 0.62 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 21 CI 15 to 49). BPRS scores showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients, (n=1145, 16 RCTs, WMD -4.22 CI -5.4 to -3.1), although the data were heterogeneous (Chi(2) 0.0001, I(2) 66%). Short-term data from the SANS negative symptom scores favoured clozapine (n=196, 5 RCTs, WMD -5.92 CI -7.8 to -4.1). We found clozapine to be more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=982, 16 RCTs, RR 0.60 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 15 CI 12 to 20). Blood problems occurred more frequently in participants receiving clozapine (3.2%) compared with those given typical antipsychotics (0%) (n=1031, 13 RCTs, RR 7.09 CI 2.0 to 25.6). Clozapine participants experienced more drowsiness, hypersalivation, or temperature increase, than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experienced fewer motor adverse effects (n=1433, 18 RCTs, RR 0.58 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 5 CI 4 to 6).The clinical effects of clozapine were more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (n=370, 4 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.6 to 0.8, NNT 4 CI 3 to 6) and symptom reduction. Thirty-four per cent of treatment-resistant participants had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine may be more effective in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse, than typical antipsychotic drugs - but data are weak and prone to bias. Participants were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. The clinical effect of clozapine, however, is, at least in the short term, not reflected in measures of global functioning such as ability to leave the hospital and maintain an occupation. The short-term benefits of clozapine have to be weighed against the risk of adverse effects. Within the context of trials, the potentially dangerous white blood cell decline seems to be more frequent in children and adolescents and in the elderly than in young adults or people of middle-age.The existing trials have largely neglected to assess the views of participants and their families on clozapine. More community-based long-term randomised trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of clozapine on global and social functioning as trials in special groups such as people with learning disabilities.

Combination therapy with amisulpride and antidepressants: clinical observations in case series of elderly patients with psychotic depression

Psychotic depression is classified as a clinical subtype of major depressive disorder. The combination of an antidepressant with an antipsychotic agent has been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of psychotic depression. However, in elderly patients with psychotic depression, little information is available on the efficacy of such combinations. Therefore, we have evaluated combination treatment for 5 weeks with amisulpride and antidepressants in non-demented elderly patients with psychotic depression. Eleven patients were treated with either citalopram 20-40 mg/day (n=5) or mirtazapine 30-60 mg/day (n=6), and amisulpride 75-100 mg/day for 5 weeks. Clinical status was evaluated at baseline and after 3 and 5 weeks using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale--17 items (HDRS) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-S). In 5 of the 11 patients there was remission of depression, while in another 5 patients there was partial remission of depression and in one patient there was no remission. Finally, there was resolution of psychotic symptoms in all the patients involved. One patient developed tremor and rigidity but insisted on continuing with the drug since her psychopathology has improved considerably after the addition of amisulpride to antidepressant treatment. In conclusion, some of the elderly patients with psychotic depression may benefit from the combination of amisulpride and antidepressant pharmacotherapy.

Safety profile of iloperidone: a pooled analysis of 6-week acute-phase pivotal trials

Iloperidone, a mixed D2/5-HT2 antagonist, is currently in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia. This article assesses the short-term safety of iloperidone using a pooled analysis of 3 phase 2, short-term acute schizophrenia studies conducted between 1998 and 2002 (N = 1943). Patients exposed to 3 dose ranges of iloperidone, another antipsychotic, or placebo were compared on rates of serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, prolactin, weight and metabolic parameters, QTc, and other standard safety parameters. The most common treatment-related AEs observed with iloperidone were dizziness, headache, dry mouth, nausea, and insomnia. Discontinuation due to AEs was 4.8% for iloperidone, 7.6% for haloperidol, 6.2% for risperidone, and 4.8% for placebo. Iloperidone groups showed better overall performance on the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale and Barnes Akathisia Scale than risperidone or haloperidol groups. Patients taking iloperidone experienced a mild weight increase (range, 1.5-2.1 kg) similar to that of risperidone (1.5 kg), whereas those on haloperidol and placebo showed mean weight loss (-0.1 kg and -0.3 kg, respectively). QTc interval significantly increased across all iloperidone groups (least squares mean change from baseline to end point, 2.9-9.1 msec) and for haloperidol (5.0 msec). No significant QTc changes occurred in the risperidone or placebo groups. Iloperidone was associated with no change from baseline in total cholesterol, mild elevation in serum glucose, and slight decrease in triglycerides. Prolactin levels decreased with iloperidone and increased significantly with risperidone and haloperidol. These short-term trials suggest that iloperidone has a reassuring safety profile in many of the areas that are of potential concern, including relatively low dropout rates because of AEs, low extrapyramidal symptoms, akathisia, and prolactin elevation, and a modest short-term effect on weight gain.

Use of clozapine in Brazilian patients with Parkinson's disease

Clozapine has been used as an attempt to manage levodopa complications in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). To investigate the use of clozapine in this context in a Brazilian sample, a retrospective chart review was carried out at the Movement Disorders Clinic from the Federal University of Minas Gerais. This study enrolled 43 PD patients who used or were in use of clozapine. Patients had a mean age of 64 years and a mean UPDRS score of 55. Clozapine was indicated for dyskinesias in 17 patients, for psychosis in 15 and for both reasons in 11. The average maximum dose was 70 mg/day. Twenty six patients used it for a mean of 3.5 years. Twenty nine presented an improvement of their condition, 9 remained clinically stable. Twenty subjects interrupted the use of clozapine, being 9 due to adverse effects. Clozapine may play a role in the management of motor and psychiatric complications in PD, but it is associated with low tolerability.

Adverse effects of atypical antipsychotics : differential risk and clinical implications

Antipsychotic drugs can be of great benefit in a range of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but all are associated with a wide range of potential adverse effects. These can impair quality of life, cause stigma, lead to poor adherence with medication, cause physical morbidity and, in extreme cases, be fatal. A comprehensive overview of tolerability requires a review of all available data, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies and postmarketing surveillance studies. Assessing the relative tolerability of atypical antipsychotics is hampered by the paucity of RCTs that compare these drugs head-to-head, and limited and inconsistent reporting of adverse effect data that makes cross-study comparisons difficult. Despite methodological problems in assessment and interpretation of tolerability data, important differences exist between the atypical antipsychotics in the relative risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms (highest risk: higher doses of risperidone), hyperglycaemia and dyslipidaemia (highest risk: clozapine and olanzapine), hyperprolactinaemia (highest risk: amisulpride and risperidone), prolongation of heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) [highest risk: ziprasidone and sertindole] and weight gain (highest risk: clozapine and olanzapine). Sedation, antimuscarinic symptoms, postural hypotension, agranulocytosis and seizures are more common with clozapine than with other atypical antipsychotics. The variation in their tolerability suggests that it is misleading to regard the atypical antipsychotics as a uniform drug class, and also means that the term 'atypical antipsychotic' has only limited usefulness. Differences between the atypical agents in terms of efficacy and pharmacodynamic profiles also support this view. As tolerability differs between specific conventional and atypical drugs, we conclude that broad statements comparing the relative risk of specific adverse effects between 'atypical' and 'conventional' antipsychotics are largely meaningless; rather, comparisons should be made between specific atypical and specific conventional drugs. Adverse effects are usually dose dependent and can be influenced by patient characteristics, including age and gender. These confounding factors should be considered in clinical practice and in the interpretation of research data. Selection of an antipsychotic should be on an individual patient basis. Patients should be involved in prescribing decisions and this should involve discussion about adverse effects.

Risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with Alzheimer's disease: preliminary findings from a naturalistic, retrospective study

The objectives of this retrospective, naturalistic study were to provide preliminary data on the effects of 6 months treatment with risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine on behavioral disturbances, within a sample of outpatients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, and on predictors of response. Between July 2005 and December 2005, data were collected from 58 consecutive outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with behavioral disturbances, who received a 6-month treatment with risperidone, olanzapine or quetiapine. Primary outcome measures were Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) total score and its items forming the basic core of behavioral disturbances in Alzheimer's disease: delusions, hallucinations and agitation/aggressiveness. Secondary outcome measures were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Activities of Daily Living, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Clinical Insight Rating scale. Correlations between baseline MMSE score and improvements in behavioral disturbances were investigated. At 6 months mean NPI total score had fallen 43.5% in the risperidone group, 45.6% in the olanzapine group and 33.3% in the quetiapine group, with no significant between-group differences. Global cognitive function showed no significant change from baseline to end-point. Incidence of adverse events was low. A significant correlation was found between MMSE score and NPI total score and NPI item agitation decreases. Risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine produced significant improvements in behavioral disturbances and were well tolerated. No significant differences emerged among treatments. The preliminary results also suggest that baseline cognitive function might influence treatment response.

Osteoporosis, schizophrenia and antipsychotics: the need for a comprehensive multifactorial evaluation

Osteoporosis is recognised as a major public health issue leading to bone fractures, pain and disability. Awareness of an elevated risk of osteoporosis in individuals with schizophrenia is increasing. An accelerated decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with schizophrenia may be disease related or drug induced. A drug-induced decrease in BMD has been attributed mostly to hyperprolactinaemia and its consequences. However, as demonstrated in this review, decreased BMD and osteoporosis are multifactorial processes, and abnormal bone structure and functions are not limited to BMD. Multiple dynamic processes may lead to impairment of bone homeostasis and eventually to bone abnormalities. Many of these processes may be abnormal in treated as well as untreated patients with schizophrenia. Despite many publications, the epidemiology of abnormal bone structure, mineralisation and dynamics in patients with schizophrenia is still not fully determined. Comprehensive studies of bone dynamics in individuals with first-episode schizophrenia, as well as in patients treated with various current medications, are needed in order to characterise the problem(s) and then to develop relevant treatment and prevention strategies.

The safety of quetiapine: results of a post-marketing surveillance study on 1728 patients in England

The safety of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine as used in general practice in England was examined by prescription-event monitoring (PEM). Patients were identified from dispensed National Health Service (NHS) prescriptions issued by general practitioners (GPs) for quetiapine between October 1997 and July 1999. The outcome data were event reports obtained by sending questionnaires ('green forms') to the prescribing doctor at Least 6 months after the first prescription for an individual patient. Green forms with clinically useful information on 1728 patients (median age 39 years (IQR 30-56); 53% female) were received. The most frequently reported event during the first month of treatment was 'drowsiness/sedation' (47; 3% cohort). This was also the most frequently reported specified adverse drug reaction (ADR) to quetiapine (7; 11% of 65 reported ADRs) and the highest reported clinical reason for stopping quetiapine (51; 6% of the 734 reported reasons for stopping). There was a low incidence of extrapyramidal disease (21 during treatment, 1% of cohort) and hyperprolactinaemia (three during treatment, 0.2%) in this study. Three cases of diabetes mellitus in this cohort were reported to be a new diagnosis. Six pregnancies were reported during treatment with quetiapine, five of which were exposed during the first trimester only. There were four Live births with no reported congenital abnormaLities. Fifty-six deaths were reported during this study (3% cohort). The most frequently reported causes of death reLated to the cardiovascular (18) and respiratory (15) systems. The results of this post-marketing surveillance study demonstrated that quetiapine is generally well-tolerated when used in general practice.

Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

Behavioral symptoms start to appear in mild and moderate dementia and become increasingly severe with the progression of the disease. Agitation, aggressiveness, and psychosis can be seen in Alzheimer's disease, and in particular are common manifestations in Lewy body dementia. It is the behavioral disturbances rather than the cognitive disorders that are more often the cause of the institutionalization of these patients because of the heavy assistance and emotional burden they represent for caregivers. Traditionally, these kinds of symptoms were controlled by classical antipsychotic agents, which after long-term use cause severe extrapyramidal effects, late dyskinesia, sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and cognitive function impairment. More recently, atypical antipsychotic agents have shown a better tolerability profile, with a reduced incidence of extrapyramidal effects, orthostatic hypotension, sedation, and a reduced impact on cognitive function. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in a group of patients with a diagnosis of dementia and concomitant psychotic disorders. The response to treatment was evaluated by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD). The NPI and BEHAVE-AD were administered at baseline and after 4 weeks and 12 weeks of therapy. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of clinically evident side effects. The results show that quetiapine is effective in reducing behavioral symptoms, deliria and hallucinations, aggressiveness, and sleep disturbances. Quetiapine tolerability proved to be satisfactory. The only side effect of clinical significance was orthostatic hypotension, which was, however, partially preventable by a slower drug titration.

Drug-induced parkinsonism

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is the second cause of akinetic rigid syndrome in the Western world and its prevalence is increasing and approaching that of idiopathic Parkinson's disease due to the ageing of the population and to the rising of polypharmacotherapy. DIP was initially reported as a complication of neuroleptics in psychiatric patients, but it has also been described with a great diversity of compounds such as antiemetics, drugs used for the treatment of vertigo, antidepressants, calcium channel antagonists, antiarrythmics, antiepileptics, cholinomimetics and other drugs. Although traditionally considered reversible, DIP may persist after drug withdrawal. At least 10% of patients with DIP develop persistent and progressive parkinsonism in spite of the discontinuation of the causative drug. Irreversible or progressive DIP has been considered as an indication of presymptomatic parkinsonian deficit, unmasked but not caused by the offending drug, but it could be explained by persistent toxicity of the responsible pharmacological agents on the nigrostriatal dopamine pathway. The best treatment of DIP is prevention, including the avoidance of prescription of causative drugs whenever it is not strictly necessary. In patients who require potentially risky medication, it is necessary to perform adequate monitoring for early parkinsonian deficits and early discontinuation if these deficits appear. Atypical neuroleptics are associated with lower risk than first generation antipsychotic drugs. Special precautions are needed in elderly subjects, in patients treated with multiple drugs for prolonged periods of time and in those with familial risk factors including familial parkinsonism or tremor, or in those with genetic variants of genes involved in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

EPS profiles: the atypical antipsychotics are not all the same

Within the first few years after chlorpromazine began to be used to treat psychosis, it was observed that it could cause many kinds of neurologic reactions that resembled those seen in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. These reactions were termed "extrapyramidal side effects" (EPS) because of their resemblance to the signs of Parkinson's disease, which were associated with degeneration of the dopamine nerve tracks located in the extrapyramidal region of the central nervous system. Eventually this association of dopamine loss, antipsychotics, and parkinsonism became a central part of the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Unfortunately, this association was also used to support the hypothesis that EPS were absolutely necessary for antipsychotic efficacy--hence the term "neuroleptic" rather than "antipsychotic." This theory, now discredited, was used to justify the practice of inducing EPS as a means to gauge whether an antipsychotic would be effective. The demonstration that clozapine, an antipsychotic virtually devoid of EPS, has better efficacy for psychosis than any other "neuroleptic" disproved the theory that EPS were fundamentally linked to efficacy. Because the idea of a relationship between EPS and efficacy was so ingrained in clinical practice, clozapine was called "atypical." Our understanding of the relationship between EPS and antipsychotic response has come full circle. With the introduction of clozapine and other newer antipsychotics, it has become clear that EPS are harmful and serve no beneficial purpose. The availability of newer antipsychotics with a lower EPS burden means that, at least in theory, it is now possible to treat psychosis without EPS in the vast majority of patients. In practice, however, EPS remain a significant problem even in the era of atypical or second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). One limitation is that the concept of "atypicality," when used to denote antipsychotic efficacy without EPS, is a relative not an absolute concept. Because all of the post-clozapine SGAs still affect the dopamine D2 receptor, it may be more accurate to say these medications have lower EPS liabilities that the earlier "neuroleptic" antipsychotics; i.e., relatively fewer patients will get EPS at therapeutic doses of one of the newer medications and, when EPS do occur, they tend to be less severe. Nonetheless, reduced EPS are not the same as no EPS, and most of the newer antipsychotics can still cause EPS in some patients. The incidence of EPS differs among the SGAs, with risperidone associated with the most and clozapine and quetiapine with the fewest EPS. The likelihood of developing EPS with a first-line SGA depends not only on the specific agent, but also on the rapidity of dose escalation, the target dose, and the patient's intrinsic vulnerability to EPS. Even with the SGAs, clinicians should not be lulled into believing EPS cannot happen, but need to be able to recognize and manage both overt and subtle manifestations of EPS. This review discusses differences among the SGAs in EPS liability, relationships between dosing and type of EPS, and situations in which differences in EPS liability among the SGAs are clinically relevant.

Quetiapine vs. risperidone in treating psychosis in neurosyphilis: a case report

OBJECTIVE

A 44-year-old male patient presented with agitation, auditory hallucinations, and delusions of persecution was diagnosed as having neurosyphilis.

METHODS

He was treated with penicillin G 24 million units/day, risperidone 6 mg/day, and memantine 20 mg/day with partial response to psychotic symptoms and significant extrapyramidal symptoms.

RESULTS

On his follow-up, after 5 months, his cognitive status and serological tests remained the same, and his cell count was increased. A second therapy of penicillin was administered without any clinical improvement. On his second hospitalization for severe psychotic agitation after approximately 1 year, quetiapine 1200 mg/day was introduced and the psychiatric state improved immediately without significant side effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Quetiapine, which has a low potential for producing extrapyramidal side effects, should be considered in the treatment of psychotic symptoms of neurosyphilis.

Antipsychotic medication for elderly people with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

A large and growing number of older people across the world suffer from schizophrenia. Recommendations for their treatment are largely based on data extrapolated from studies of the use of antipsychotic medications in younger populations. In addition most manufacturers of such medications recommend prescription of reduced doses to the elderly. The evidence base for these assumptions is unclear and raises obvious questions regarding the appropriateness of such prescribing practice.

OBJECTIVES

To find and assimilate good evidence of the effects of antipsychotic medication for treatment of schizophrenia in people over 65 years of age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (May 2003). We inspected references of all included studies for further trials and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All clinical randomised trials evaluating antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses in older people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data, the random effects, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty two elderly people with schizophrenia participated in three relevant randomised controlled studies. We were unable to extract usable data on quality of life, satisfaction, service use, or economic outcomes. One small study (n=18) compared thioridazine with remoxipride (RR leaving the study early 1.0 CI 0.07 to 13.6). A second study (n=175) compared risperidone with olanzapine. Global state 'not improved/worse' was not significantly different between treatments (n= 171, RR 1.26 CI 0.8 to 1.9); mental state PANSS total endpoint scores were also equivocal (n=171, RR 0.98 CI 0.76 to 1.26) as were all cognitive function tests. The third study (subset n=59) compared olanzapine with haloperidol and mental state change scores (BPRS WMD -3.60 CI -10.8 to 3.6; PANSS WMD -6.00 CI -18.3 to 6.3) were equivocal.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotics may be widely used in the treatment of elderly people with schizophrenia, however, based on this systematic review, there are little robust data available to guide the clinician with respect to the most appropriate drug to prescribe. Clearly reported large short, medium and long-term randomised controlled trials with participants, interventions and primary outcomes that are familiar to those wishing to help elderly people with schizophrenia are long overdue.

Focus on lower risk of tardive dyskinesia with atypical antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is one of the most serious iatrogenic neurological complications of the first-generation antipsychotics. Identifying the risk factors for TD is important to minimize the risk of this potentially irreversible movement disorder in susceptible populations.

METHODS

A Medline search was conducted for the literature on risk factors for TD with the first-generation antipsychotics, as well as the emerging literature of the lower risk of TD with the second-generation antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Several demographic, phenomenological, comorbidities and treatment variables have been reported to be associated with higher risk of TD. On the other hand, significantly lower rates of TD have been reported with the second-generation atypical antipsychotics, even in high risk groups such as the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the second-generation antipsychotics as first-line treatment of psychosis appears to have lowered the overall prevalence of acute movement disorders as well as TD, and have led them to become the standard of care in part because of their safer extrapyramidal profiles.

Hemiballismus

Hemiballismus is the most dramatic movement disorder seen in clinical practice. Its emergence points to a structural lesion or metabolic dysfunction in the region of the subthalamic nucleus, its afferent or efferent pathways, or interconnected deep brain nuclei, usually on the side contralateral to the movements. Any focal process may be to blame, but elderly sufferers generally have had vascular events, whereas the etiology is infectious or inflammatory in younger patients. Severe nonketotic hyperglycemia is another important cause of hemiballismus in the elderly. Hemiballismus patients require treatment both for the underlying etiology of the movement and for the movements themselves. There are no large controlled clinical trials to guide anti-ballismus therapy. However, dopamine receptor blocking agents have an established track record in suppressing choreic and ballistic movements, and are first-line agents for acute treatment. Standard neuroleptics such as haloperidol and perphenazine are started at low doses and titrated as tolerated until the movements are controlled. Atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone and clozapine have been used in small series and may have a reduced risk of extrapyramidal side effects. Catecholamine-depleting agents such as reserpine and tetrabenazine may be considered when long-term therapy is required. Other pharmacologic agents have met with varying success. The course of hemiballismus may be complicated by exhaustion, injury, or metabolic disorders, but with good supportive care, acute survival is good, and long-term survival reflects the prognosis of the underlying etiology. In time, the ballistic movements themselves tend to subside allowing withdrawal of drugs in many cases. When movements persist, stereotactic functional neurosurgical procedures may be considered in good surgical candidates.

Olanzapine vs. other antipsychotics in actual out-patient settings: six months tolerability results from the European Schizophrenia Out-patient Health Outcomes study

OBJECTIVE

The European Schizophrenia Out-patient Health Outcomes study is an observational study investigating treatment in schizophrenia. We report treatment-emergent adverse events during the first 6 months of treatment.

METHOD

The rate of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), anticholinergic use, weight gain and sexual related dysfunctions were assessed in 8,400 out-patients.

RESULTS

Patients typical antipsychotics and risperidone experienced significantly more EPS and anticholinergic use than patients in the clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine cohorts. Patients treated with amisulpride, typical antipsychotics and risperidone were significantly more likely to have sexual related dysfunctions and/or amenorrhea. Increases in weight and body mass index occurred in all cohorts, but were significantly greater in the olanzapine and clozapine cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine and clozapine had better tolerability outcomes regarding EPS and sexual related dysfunctions compared with patients receiving risperidone, amisulpride and typicals. Patients treated with olanzapine and clozapine had higher weight increases than patients treated with risperidone, quetiapine and typicals.