Abstract
There is evidence that the yearly incidence rate of hydatid disease may be increasing in endemic areas and in regions of the world hitherto free of the infection. The availability of an accurate method of detection in both man and other animals would facilitate understanding of the global epidemiology. The diagnostic procedures in use in human hydatidosis have often given inconclusive results in animal infections. The following tests are discussed and their usefulness appraised: intradermal, complement fixation, haemagglutination, latex agglutination, indirect fluorescent antibody, immunoelectrophoresis, counter immunoelectrophoresis, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, radio-immuno assay and lymphocyte transformation.
Collapse