1
|
Al-Shalchy A, Ali Al-Wassiti AS, Elboraay T, Mutar MT, Hashim MAB, Al-Khazaali YM, Muthana A, Bani Saad M, Al-Taie RH, Ismail M. Orbital Rhabdomyosarcoma: Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Staging, and Treatment Outcomes. World Neurosurg 2024; 190:386-398.e2. [PMID: 39047866 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.07.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common primary malignant orbital tumor in childhood, presents unique challenges in management due to its genetic basis and abnormal cellular proliferation. Management has evolved from surgical excision to multimodal approaches, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. This review explores trends in epidemiology, pathophysiological insights, and treatment evolution to delineate optimal therapeutic strategies. METHODS A literature search was conducted across PubMed and Scopus databases up to March 4, 2024, using keywords related to orbital RMS. Studies were selected based on predefined criteria, focusing on clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, management strategies, and outcomes. Data extraction and analysis were performed independently by 2 reviewers, with quality assessment based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. RESULTS The review synthesized data from 17 studies, highlighting demographic patterns, clinical characteristics, staging, and treatment approaches. Most patients were male and white, with a higher proportion of early-stages diagnoses. The embryonal subtype was the most common, and treatment has shifted toward radiation therapy and combined modalities. In orbital RMS, several modalities are applied in treatment. There are radiotherapy, surgical interventions, and chemotherapy. Recent studies put more emphasis on the long-term outcome of the disease about orbital bone development and facial symmetry. CONCLUSIONS Management of orbital RMS has evolved significantly, with a current emphasis on multimodal treatment strategies. Future research should focus on optimizing therapeutic approaches to balance effective tumor control with the preservation of orbital function and esthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Al-Shalchy
- Department of Surgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | | | - Toka Elboraay
- Faculty of Medicine Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Tareq Mutar
- Department of Surgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Mohammed A B Hashim
- Department of Surgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Younus M Al-Khazaali
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Ahmed Muthana
- Department of Surgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Mohammed Bani Saad
- Department of Surgery, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Rania H Al-Taie
- Department of Surgery, Univeristy of Mustansiriyah, College of Medicine, Baghdad, Iraq
| | - Mustafa Ismail
- Department of Surgery, Baghdad Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Routh J, Buchanan AF. Pediatric Urologic Oncology Series-Paratesticular Rhabdomyosarcoma. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00742-8. [PMID: 39208939 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
|
3
|
Gabrielson AT, Buchanan AF, Passoni N, Granberg C, Romao R, Routh JC. Pediatric Urologic Oncology Series-Bladder/Prostate Rhabdomyosarcoma. Urology 2024:S0090-4295(24)00722-2. [PMID: 39208941 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Niccolo Passoni
- Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Rodrigo Romao
- University of Toronto and SickKids Hospital, Toronto, ON
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chisholm J, Mandeville H, Adams M, Minard-Collin V, Rogers T, Kelsey A, Shipley J, van Rijn RR, de Vries I, van Ewijk R, de Keizer B, Gatz SA, Casanova M, Hjalgrim LL, Firth C, Wheatley K, Kearns P, Liu W, Kirkham A, Rees H, Bisogno G, Wasti A, Wakeling S, Heenen D, Tweddle DA, Merks JHM, Jenney M. Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FAR-RMS) Clinical Trial: A Report from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:998. [PMID: 38473359 PMCID: PMC10931395 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS) clinical trial is an overarching, multinational study for children and adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The trial, developed by the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), incorporates multiple different research questions within a multistage design with a focus on (i) novel regimens for poor prognostic subgroups, (ii) optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and (iii) optimal use of radiotherapy for local control and widespread metastatic disease. Additional sub-studies focusing on biological risk stratification, use of imaging modalities, including [18F]FDG PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as prognostic markers, and impact of therapy on quality of life are described. This paper forms part of a Special Issue on rhabdomyosarcoma and outlines the study background, rationale for randomisations and sub-studies, design, and plans for utilisation and dissemination of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Chisholm
- Children and Young People’s Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK;
| | - Henry Mandeville
- Children and Young People’s Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK;
| | - Madeleine Adams
- Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK; (M.A.); (M.J.)
| | | | - Timothy Rogers
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK;
| | - Anna Kelsey
- Department of Paediatric Histopathology, Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK;
| | - Janet Shipley
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK; (J.S.); (A.W.)
| | - Rick R. van Rijn
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Isabelle de Vries
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.d.V.); (R.v.E.); (B.d.K.); (J.H.M.M.)
| | - Roelof van Ewijk
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.d.V.); (R.v.E.); (B.d.K.); (J.H.M.M.)
| | - Bart de Keizer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.d.V.); (R.v.E.); (B.d.K.); (J.H.M.M.)
| | - Susanne A. Gatz
- Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK;
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | | | | | - Charlotte Firth
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | - Pamela Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | - Wenyu Liu
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | - Amanda Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (C.F.); (K.W.); (P.K.); (W.L.); (A.K.)
| | - Helen Rees
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK;
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy;
| | - Ajla Wasti
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK; (J.S.); (A.W.)
| | | | | | - Deborah A. Tweddle
- Vivo Biobank, Translational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;
| | - Johannes H. M. Merks
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (I.d.V.); (R.v.E.); (B.d.K.); (J.H.M.M.)
| | - Meriel Jenney
- Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK; (M.A.); (M.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koscielniak E, Timmermann B, Münter M, Weclawek-Tompol J, Ladenstein R, Niggli F, Ljungman G, Brecht IB, Blank B, Hallmen E, Scheer M, Fuchs J, Seitz G, Blattmann C, Sparber-Sauer M, Klingebiel T. Which Patients With Rhabdomyosarcoma Need Radiotherapy? Analysis of the Radiotherapy Strategies of the CWS-96 and CWS-2002P Studies and SoTiSaR Registry. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4916-4926. [PMID: 37725766 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze and compare the indications, doses, and application methods of radiotherapy (RT) and their influence on prognosis of patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS One thousand four hundred seventy patients with localized RMS 21 years and younger entered on CWS-96, CWS-2002P, and SoTiSaR were eligible for the analysis. The median follow-up was 6.5 years (IQR, 3.3-9.5). RESULTS The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and local control survival (LCS) for 910 (62%) irradiated versus nonirradiated patients were 71% versus 69% and 78% versus 73% (P = .03), respectively. Ninety-five percent of patients in IRS I (90% embryonal RMS [eRMS]) were nonirradiated (EFS, 87%). Irradiated patients with IRS II had improved LCS (91% v 80%; P = .01) and EFS (not significant). In IRS III, EFS and LCS were significantly better for RT patients: 71% versus 56% (P = 3.1e-06) and 76% versus 61% (P = 4.1e-07). Patients with tumors in the head and neck region (orbita, parameningeal, and nonparameningeal) and in other sites had significantly better EFS and LCS and in parameningeal also overall survival (OS). The efficacy of low RT doses of 32 Gy (hyperfractionated, accelerated RT [HART]) and 36 and 41.4 Gy (conventional fractionated RT [CFRT]) in the favorable groups and higher doses of 44.8 Gy (HART) and 50.4 and 55.4 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups was comparable. Proton RT was used predominantly in head/neck-parameningeal (HN-PM) tumors, with similar EFS and LCS to photon RT. CONCLUSION RT can be omitted in patients with IRS I eRMS. RT improves LCS and EFS in IRS II and III. RT improves OS in patients with HN-PM, with proton RT comparable with photon RT. Doses of 32 Gy (HART) or 36 and 41.4 Gy (CFRT) had comparable efficacy in patients with favorable risk profiles and 44.8 Gy (HART) or 50.4 and 55.8 Gy (CFRT) in the unfavorable groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewa Koscielniak
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marc Münter
- Hospital for Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | | - Felix Niggli
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gustaf Ljungman
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ines B Brecht
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernd Blank
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Erika Hallmen
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Monika Scheer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joerg Fuchs
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Guido Seitz
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Blattmann
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Monika Sparber-Sauer
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Klinikum Stuttgart, Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Klingebiel
- Department for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
de Traux de Wardin H, Xu B, Dermawan JK, Smith MH, Wolden SL, Antonescu CR, Wexler LH. Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma-An Integrated Clinicopathologic and Genomic Study to Improve Risk Stratification. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200705. [PMID: 37315267 PMCID: PMC10309566 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Extremity rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is associated with a very poor outcome compared with other sites, mainly because of its high incidence of alveolar histology and regional lymph node involvement. To better define prognostic markers in this clinical subset, we investigated our experience of 61 patients with extremity RMS treated at our tertiary cancer center for the past 2 decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS The patients had a median age of 8 years at diagnosis, equal gender distribution, and two-thirds occurred in the lower extremity. Most (85%) patients had FOXO1 fusion-positive alveolar RMS (ARMS), with 70% having a PAX3::FOXO1 transcript. Remaining were seven patients with fusion-negative embryonal RMS (ERMS) and two with MYOD1-mutant spindle cell/sclerosing RMS (SRMS). In 40% of the patients, material was available for DNA-based targeted sequencing using MSK-IMPACT cancer gene panel. RESULTS One-third of patients presented with localized disease at diagnosis while the remaining had regional nodal (18%) or distant metastases (51%). Metastatic disease, high-risk group, and age 10 years or older significantly affected the overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 2.68 [P = .004], 2.78 [P = .010] and 2.26 [P = .034], respectively). Although the presence of metastatic disease had a dismal impact on 5-year EFS and OS (19% and 29%, respectively), nodal involvement had a comparatively lower impact on 5-year EFS and 5-year OS (43% and 66%, respectively). PAX3::FOXO1 ARMS had worse prognosis and afflicted older children compared with PAX7::FOXO1 (HR = 3.45, P = .016). The most common events in the ARMS group included MED12 alterations, CDK4 amplifications, and CDKN2A deletions (8%-17%). The latter two abnormalities were mutually exclusive, enriched for acral and high-risk lesions, and correlated with poor outcome on OS (P = .02). CONCLUSION Our data provide rationale for considering the integration of molecular abnormalities to refine risk stratification in extremity RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Mariel H. Smith
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA
| | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Leonard H. Wexler
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaze MN, Smeulders N, Ackwerh R, Allen C, Bal N, Boutros M, Cho A, Eminowicz G, Gill E, Fittall MW, Humphries PD, Lim P, Mushtaq I, Nguyen T, Peet C, Pendse D, Polhill S, Rees H, Sands G, Shankar A, Slater O, Sullivan T, Hoskin PJ. A National Referral Service for Paediatric Brachytherapy: An Evolving Practice and Outcomes Over 13 Years. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:237-244. [PMID: 36588012 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Most children requiring radiotherapy receive external beam treatment and few have tumours suitable for brachytherapy. No paediatric radiotherapy centre will treat enough patients from its own normal catchment population for expertise in brachytherapy to be developed and sustained. Following discussion and agreement in the national paediatric radiotherapy group, a service for paediatric brachytherapy in the UK has been developed. We report the process that has evolved over more than 10 years, with survival and functional outcome results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 2009, potential patients have been referred to the central paediatric oncology multidisciplinary team meeting, where imaging, pathology and treatment options are discussed. Since 2013, the National Soft Tissue Sarcoma Advisory Panel has also reviewed most patients, with the principal aim of advising on the most suitable primary tumour management for complex patients. Clinical assessment and examination under anaesthetic with biopsies may be undertaken to confirm the appropriateness of brachytherapy, either alone or following conservative surgery. Fractionated high dose rate brachytherapy was delivered to a computed tomography planned volume after implantation of catheters under ultrasound imaging guidance. Since 2019, follow-up has been in a dedicated multidisciplinary clinic. RESULTS From 2009 to 2021 inclusive, 35 patients (16 female, 19 male, aged 8 months to 17 years 6 months) have been treated. Histology was soft-tissue sarcoma in 33 patients and carcinoma in two. The treated site was pelvic in 31 patients and head and neck in four. With a median follow-up of 5 years, the local control and overall survival rates are 100%. Complications have been few, and functional outcome is good. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy is effective for selected paediatric patients, resulting in excellent tumour control and good functional results. It is feasible to deliver paediatric brachytherapy at a single centre within a national referral service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M N Gaze
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - N Smeulders
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Ackwerh
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Allen
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Bal
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Boutros
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Cho
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Eminowicz
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - E Gill
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Fittall
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P D Humphries
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Lim
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - I Mushtaq
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Nguyen
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Peet
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Pendse
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Polhill
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Rees
- University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - G Sands
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Shankar
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - O Slater
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Sullivan
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P J Hoskin
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morris CD, Tunn PU, Rodeberg DA, Terwisscha van Scheltinga S, Binitie O, Godzinski J, Dall'Igna P, Million L, Hawkins DS, Koscielniak E, Bisogno G, Rogers TN. Surgical management of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: A consensus opinion from the Children's Oncology Group, the European Pediatric Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e28608. [PMID: 32776456 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma remains a challenge due to several adverse prognostic factors frequently associated with this tumor site. The International Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) is a collaboration of the Children's Oncology Group Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European Pediatric Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe. The INSTRuCT surgical committee developed an internationally applicable consensus opinion document for the surgical treatment of extremity rhabdomyosarcoma. This document addresses surgical management, including biopsy, nodal staging, timing of therapy, resection and reexcision, reconstruction, and surgical approach at relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol D Morris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Per-Ulf Tunn
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
| | - David A Rodeberg
- Division Pediatric Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | | | - Odion Binitie
- Sarcoma Department, Adolescent and Young Adult Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jan Godzinski
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Marciniak Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland and Department of Pediatric Traumatology and Emergency Medicine, Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Patrizia Dall'Igna
- Pediatric Surgery Division, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Lynn Million
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ewa Koscielniak
- Klinikum Stuttgart, Zentrum für Kinder, Jugendund Frauenmedizin, Olga Hospital, Pediatrics 5 (Pediatric Oncology Hematology and Immunology), Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Hematology and Oncology Division, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - Timothy N Rogers
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pomella S, Porrazzo A, Cassandri M, Camero S, Codenotti S, Milazzo L, Vulcano F, Barillari G, Cenci G, Marchese C, Fanzani A, Megiorni F, Rota R, Marampon F. Translational Implications for Radiosensitizing Strategies in Rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:13281. [PMID: 36362070 PMCID: PMC9656983 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood and adolescence that includes FP-RMS, harboring the fusion oncoprotein PAX3/7-FOXO1 and FN-RMS, often mutant in the RAS pathway. Risk stratifications of RMS patients determine different prognostic groups and related therapeutic treatment. Current multimodal therapeutic strategies involve surgery, chemotherapy (CHT) and radiotherapy (RT), but despite the deeper knowledge of response mechanisms underpinning CHT treatment and the technological improvements that characterize RT, local failures and recurrence frequently occur. This review sums up the RMS classification and the management of RMS patients, with special attention to RT treatment and possible radiosensitizing strategies for RMS tumors. Indeed, RMS radioresistance is a clinical problem and further studies aimed at dissecting radioresistant molecular mechanisms are needed to identify specific targets to hit, thus improving RT-induced cytotoxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Pomella
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00146 Rome, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Porrazzo
- Units of Molecular Genetics of Complex Phenotypes, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00146 Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Cassandri
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00146 Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Camero
- Department of Maternal, Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Codenotti
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Division of Biotechnology, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Luisa Milazzo
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Vulcano
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Barillari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cenci
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology “C. Darwin”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Cinzia Marchese
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fanzani
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Division of Biotechnology, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Megiorni
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Rota
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00146 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Camero S, Cassandri M, Pomella S, Milazzo L, Vulcano F, Porrazzo A, Barillari G, Marchese C, Codenotti S, Tomaciello M, Rota R, Fanzani A, Megiorni F, Marampon F. Radioresistance in rhabdomyosarcomas: Much more than a question of dose. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1016894. [PMID: 36248991 PMCID: PMC9559533 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1016894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children, frequently accounting the genitourinary tract is complex and requires a multimodal therapy. In particular, as a consequence of the advancement in dose conformity technology, radiation therapy (RT) has now become the standard therapeutic option for patients with RMS. In the clinical practice, dose and timing of RT are adjusted on the basis of patients' risk stratification to reduce late toxicity and side effects on normal tissues. However, despite the substantial improvement in cure rates, local failure and recurrence frequently occur. In this review, we summarize the general principles of the treatment of RMS, focusing on RT, and the main molecular pathways and specific proteins involved into radioresistance in RMS tumors. Specifically, we focused on DNA damage/repair, reactive oxygen species, cancer stem cells, and epigenetic modifications that have been reported in the context of RMS neoplasia in both in vitro and in vivo studies. The precise elucidation of the radioresistance-related molecular mechanisms is of pivotal importance to set up new more effective and tolerable combined therapeutic approaches that can radiosensitize cancer cells to finally ameliorate the overall survival of patients with RMS, especially for the most aggressive subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Camero
- Department of Maternal, Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Cassandri
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Pomella
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Milazzo
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Vulcano
- Department of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Porrazzo
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Units of Molecular Genetics of Complex Phenotypes, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCSS), Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Barillari
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Cinzia Marchese
- Department of Experimental Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Codenotti
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Miriam Tomaciello
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Rota
- Department of Oncohematology, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fanzani
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Megiorni
- Department of Experimental Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Casey DL, Mandeville H, Bradley JA, Ter Horst SAJ, Sheyn A, Timmermann B, Wolden SL. Local control of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma: An expert consensus guideline from the International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Consortium (INSTRuCT). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29751. [PMID: 35484997 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The International Soft Tissue Sarcoma Database Consortium (INSTRuCT) consists of a collaboration between the Children's Oncology Group (COG) Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee, the European pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS). As part of the larger initiative of INSTRuCT to provide consensus expert opinions for clinical treatment of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma, we sought to provide updated, evidenced-based consensus guidelines for local treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma using both existing literature as well as recommendations from the relevant cooperative group clinical trials. Overall, parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma represents a distinctly challenging disease to treat, given its location near many critical structures in the head and neck, frequently advanced local presentation, and predilection for local failure. Definitive chemoradiation remains the standard treatment approach for parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma, with surgery often limited to biopsy or salvage therapy for recurrent disease. In this consensus paper, we specifically discuss consensus guidelines and evidence for definitive local management with radiotherapy, with a focus on imaging for radiotherapy planning, dose and timing of radiation, approach for nodal irradiation, various radiation techniques, including proton therapy, and the limited role of surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Henry Mandeville
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Simone A J Ter Horst
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anthony Sheyn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haduong JH, Heske CM, Rhoades WA, Xue W, Teot LA, Rodeberg DA, Donaldson SS, Weiss A, Hawkins DS, Venkatramani R. An update on rhabdomyosarcoma risk stratification and the rationale for current and future Children's Oncology Group clinical trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29511. [PMID: 35129294 PMCID: PMC8976559 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) comprise a heterogeneous population with variable overall survival rates ranging between approximately 6% and 100% depending on defined risk factors. Although the risk stratification of patients has been refined across five decades of collaborative group studies, molecular prognostic biomarkers beyond FOXO1 fusion status have yet to be incorporated prospectively in upfront risk-based therapy assignments. This review describes the evolution of risk-based therapy and the current risk stratification, defines a new risk stratification incorporating novel biomarkers, and provides the rationale for the current and upcoming Children's Oncology Group RMS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine H. Haduong
- Hyundai Cancer Institute, Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital Orange County, 1201 West La Veta Ave, Orange, CA 92868, USA; T (714) 509-8699; F (714) 509-8636;
| | - Christine M. Heske
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Wei Xue
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Lisa A. Teot
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - David A. Rodeberg
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC USA
| | | | - Aaron Weiss
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rajkumar Venkatramani
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Spunt SL. Patients with nonmetastatic embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma arising in the biliary tract should be treated on low-risk clinical trials. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2022; 69:e29399. [PMID: 34613653 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sheri L Spunt
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aksoy R, Güler E, Karaali K, Aksu M, Gürer İ, Akbaş H, Özay M. Challenging treatment of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma with leptomeningeal metastasis: Case report and review of literature. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:1823-1826. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1491_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
15
|
Nishida Y, Kawai A. Surgical treatment for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: longitudinal national questionnaire survey in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 52:362-369. [PMID: 34963137 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extremity rhabdomyosarcoma differs from other soft tissue sarcomas, being highly sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy and having a high rate of metastasis to lymph nodes. Therefore, the treatment modality differs from that of other soft tissue sarcomas. The purpose of this study was to conduct a longitudinal questionnaire survey of orthopedic oncologists in charge of surgical treatment for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma in Japan to determine whether the treatment modality chosen here is in line with the international and national treatment ones. METHODS Questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2019 to orthopedic oncologists of Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. RESULTS Responses were obtained from 80 facilities and 76 facilities, respectively. Fewer than 50% of the facilities treated one or more patients a year in both years. Many facilities first performed diagnostic biopsy, but most did not perform pretreatment re-excision. The number of facilities that provided radiotherapy in addition to surgery increased significantly from 2012 to 2019 (P = 0.028), but it was still 21% in 2019. The number of facilities performing excision and lymph node dissection was 19% in both 2012 and 2019, which was a very low result without improvement. The departments responsible for follow-up have been changed to pediatrics and orthopedic oncology in tandem (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy and pathological evaluation of lymph nodes are important for improving the prognosis of patients with extremity rhabdomyosarcoma. It is necessary to continue and develop more efficient educational activities on the appropriate medical treatment modalities for extremity RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frankart AJ, Breneman JC, Pater LE. Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3567. [PMID: 34298780 PMCID: PMC8305800 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of radiation therapy is an important part of multimodality treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma. The specific doses, treatment volumes, and techniques used in radiation therapy can vary dramatically based upon a number of factors including location, tumor size, and molecular characteristics, resulting in complex decisions in treatment planning. This article reviews the principles of evaluation and management for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma including a summary of the historical studies upon which current management is based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luke E. Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; (A.J.F.); (J.C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yechieli RL, Mandeville HC, Hiniker SM, Bernier-Chastagner V, McGovern S, Scarzello G, Wolden S, Cameron A, Breneman J, Fajardo RD, Donaldson SS. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28254. [PMID: 33818882 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma is a heterogeneous disease both in presentation and histology. Improvements in a multimodality therapy resulted in the improved overall survival for patients with a low-risk and intermediate-risk disease but not for patients with a metastatic disease. We reviewed and contrasted the North American and European practice patterns, though ultimately the principles of staging, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are similar in both Children's Oncology Group and International Society of Paediatric Oncology treatment approaches. Efforts are underway to investigate improved local control rates in higher risk patients using radiation dose escalation strategies, and delayed primary excision in select cases. The prognostic significance of imaging-based chemotherapy response, proton therapy, novel biomarkers, and targeted drugs will be determined in upcoming clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Valerie Bernier-Chastagner
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - Susan McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Suzanne Wolden
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alison Cameron
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - John Breneman
- University of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Ohio
| | - Raquel Davila Fajardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sarah S Donaldson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sha X, Duan J, Lin X, Zhu J, Zhang R, Sun T, Wang H, Meng X, Yin Y. A New Proton Therapy Solution Provides Superior Cardiac Sparing Compared With Photon Therapy in Whole Lung Irradiation for Pediatric Tumor Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 10:611514. [PMID: 33604292 PMCID: PMC7884855 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.611514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Whole lung irradiation (WLI) plays a crucial role in local control in pediatric patients with lung metastases and improves patient survival. The intention of this research was to explore the advantage of cardiac sparing between photons and protons during WLI. We also propose a new solution for cardiac sparing with proton techniques. Methods Eleven patients with pediatric tumors and pulmonary metastasis treated with 12 Gy WLI (all received volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)) in our institute between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively selected. Each patient was replanned with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy (HT), and two intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) plans (IMPT-1 and IMPT-2). IMPT-1 considered the whole lung as the planning target volume (PTV), utilizing the anteroposterior technique (0/180°). IMPT-2 was a new proton solution that we proposed in this research. This approach considered the unilateral lung as the PTV, and 3 ipsilateral fields were designed for each lung. Then, IMPT-2 was generated by summing two unilateral lung plans. The primary objective was to obtain adequate coverage (95% of the prescription dose to the PTV) while maximally sparing the dose to the heart. The PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and dose–volume statistics of the heart and substructures were assessed by means of the averages of each comparison parameter. Results All treatment techniques achieved the target volume coverage required by clinical practice. HT yielded the best coverage and homogeneity for the target structure compared with other techniques. The CI from IMRT was excellent. For photon radiation therapy, the HT plan afforded superior dose sparing for the V5, V6, V7, V8, and Dmean of the heart and Dmean of the right ventricle (RV). IMRT displayed the most notable dose reductions in the V9, V10, V11, and V12 of the heart and Dmean of the right atrium (RA). The VMAT plan was the least effective on the heart and substructures. However, compared with photon radiation therapy, IMPT-1 did not show an advantage for heart protection. Interestingly, IMPT-2 provided significant superiority in cardiac sparing, including maximum dose sparing for the V5, V6, V7, V8, V9 and Dmean of the heart and Dmean of the RA, RV, left atrium (LA) and left ventricle (LV) compared to all other techniques. Conclusions Considering the complex anatomical relation between target volumes and organs at risk (OARs), IMPT can provide a dose advantage for organs located outside of the target area rather than within or surrounding the area. It is hoped that advances in proton therapy (PT) plan design will lead to further improvements in radiotherapy approaches and provide the best treatment choice for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Sha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jinghao Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xiutong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Computer-Assisted Surgery, Qingdao, China
| | - Ruohui Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital, Qingdao, China
| | - Xiangjuan Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma is the commonest soft tissue sarcoma in children. Clinicians need vigilance to recognize the different signs and symptoms this tumor can present with because of variable sites of origin. Diagnosis requires a safe biopsy that obtains sufficient tissue for pathologic, genetic, and biological characterization of the tumor. Treatment depends on accurate staging with imaging and surgical sampling of draining lymph nodes. A multidisciplinary team assigns patients to risk-based therapy. Patients require chemotherapy and usually a combination of complex, site-specific surgery and/or radiotherapy. Outcomes for localized rhabdomyosarcoma continue to improve but new treatments are required for metastatic and relapsed disease.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Recent clinical trials have revealed several unanticipated complexities in the optimal management of genitourinary rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). Improvement in outcomes for low- and intermediate-risk RMS over the past several decades led to the design of clinical trials aimed at reducing acute and late toxicity from extirpative surgeries, conventional radiotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy. Results from these studies are mixed and have illuminated areas where historical risk stratification strategies need refining. Although radiotherapy has now become the standard for local control for most patients with genitourinary RMS, recent studies are demonstrating that there may be opportunities to minimize radiation toxicity while maintaining acceptable failure-free survival. A reduction in cyclophosphamide exposure may benefit select low-risk RMS patients but recent results illustrate that decreasing therapy intensity for most genitourinary RMS patients will require careful consideration in future prospective trials. Finally, recent studies highlight differences in perspective between European and North American investigators regarding the optimal balance of increased local failure rates but less toxicity versus improved event-free survival at a cost of higher toxicity. This review focuses on the results from the most recent RMS clinical trials and discusses their implications for the management of pediatric genitourinary RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Deel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barthère X, Guillerm S, Quero L, Le Maignan C, Torossian N, Verillaud B, Itti R, Hennequin C. Adult parameningial alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: Case report and literature review. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:870-875. [PMID: 33172776 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) represents the most common childhood soft tissue sarcoma, but they are rarely seen among adults. Most of the protocols for adults are adapted from pediatric protocols. Here we report a case of a 53-year-old woman diagnosed with a nasal alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, stage IV at diagnosis, treated by chemotherapy (a regimen inspired from the pediatric protocole pEpSSG RMS 2005) which led to partial response followed by chemo-radiotherapy. We performed a systematic review of adult head and neck ARMS and found 29 cases. Primary chemotherapy with different protocols (VAC, VAI or VIE) should be done followed by surgery and/or external beam radiotherapy (preferably with IMRT). EBRT seems beneficial to every ARMS with a dose around 50Gy in a conventional fractionation, eventually completed with a boost on residual tumor. The target volume must be defined on pre-chemotherapy imaging. Brachytherapy and proton therapy are under evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Barthère
- Radiation oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Sophie Guillerm
- Radiation oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Radiation oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Christine Le Maignan
- Medical oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Nourezza Torossian
- Medical oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Verillaud
- Head and neck surgery, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Ramona Itti
- Radiation oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Hennequin
- Radiation oncology department, groupe hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, université Paris-VII, AP-HP, 75475 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dombrowski ND, Wolter NE, Robson CD, Kawai K, Irace AL, Vargas SO, Marcus KJ, Mack JW, Collins NB, Rahbar R. Role of Surgery in Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Head and Neck in Children. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:E984-E992. [PMID: 33107076 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. The goal of this research is to analyze the role of surgery in the management of pediatric parameningeal (PM) and non-PM head and neck RMS (HNRMS). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. METHODS Retrospective chart review of patients <20 years of age treated for HNRMS between 1970 and 2015. Clinical presentation, tumor characteristics, treatment, recurrence, follow-up, and outcome data were collected. RESULTS Of 97 patients with HNRMS, 56% were male. Overall median (IQR: interquartile range) age at diagnosis was 5.8 (3.3-9.8) years. Sixty-five patients (67%) had PM tumors. Of 75 patients with histologic subtype identified, 51 (53%) had embryonal and 20 (21%) alveolar RMS. Almost all patients received chemotherapy (99%) and radiotherapy (95%). Forty-four patients (45%) underwent surgery. Surgery was more likely to be conducted in patients with lesions of a non-PM site. Median follow-up time was 3.4 years (IQR: 1.1-10.8). In 5 years of follow-up, 20% (17 of 85) died and 29% (20 of 70) had recurrence. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 72% (95% CI, 57.8, 81.5%). Surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality after accounting for TNM stage 4 and tumor site (adjusted HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07, 0.79; P = .02). The association between surgery and risk of mortality was similar in PM and non-PM tumors. CONCLUSION A multimodal protocol for treatment including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy is the mainstay for management of children with HNRMS. While surgery is more commonly used to treat non-PM HNRMS, patients who are able to undergo surgery have significantly higher 5-year survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E984-E992, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha D Dombrowski
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Nikolaus E Wolter
- Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caroline D Robson
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Kosuke Kawai
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Alexandria L Irace
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Sara O Vargas
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Natalie B Collins
- Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Reza Rahbar
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Aye JM, Chi YY, Tian J, Rudzinski ER, Binitie OT, Dasgupta R, Wolden SL, Hawkins DS, Gupta AA. Do children and adolescents with completely resected alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma require adjuvant radiation? A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28243. [PMID: 32124549 PMCID: PMC7325864 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains unclear in patients with localized, completely resected (group I) alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS). PROCEDURE Patients with group I ARMS enrolled on any one of three prior Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials (D9602, D9803, or ARST0531) were analyzed. All patients received systemic chemotherapy and 36 Gy adjuvant RT (if given) to the primary site at week 12 or week 4 for D9602/D9803 and ARST0531, respectively. RESULTS Thirty-six patients with group I ARMS were treated on D9602 (n = 6), D9803 (n = 17), or ARST0531 (n = 13), of whom 24 (67%) were male. The median age was 4.1 years (range, 0.8-45.8). Twenty (56%) patients had an unfavorable primary site, and 10 (28%) had tumors > 5 cm. FOXO1-fusion status was negative, positive, and unknown in 10 (28%), 15 (42%), and 11 (30%) tumors, respectively. Twenty-two (61%) patients received RT. Overall, the four-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 70.8% and 88.3%, respectively. Patients with FOXO1 positivity who received RT had superior EFS compared with those who did not (77.8% vs 16.7%; P = 0.03). Among 10 patients who were FOXO1 negative, the outcome was similar with or without RT. CONCLUSIONS Although limited by a small sample size, data from this study support the routine use of adjuvant RT in patients with FOXO1-positive disease even after complete resection. Additionally, omitting adjuvant RT is rational for patients with FOXO1-negative ARMS and will be prospectively investigated in the current COG trial ARST1431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie M. Aye
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Yueh-yun Chi
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jing Tian
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Erin R. Rudzinski
- Department of Pathology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Odion T. Binitie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida
| | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Abha A. Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas of childhood are a heterogenous group of tumors with a wide spectrum of presentations and outcomes. Most patients require multimodal therapy with chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiation. Improved outcomes in recent decades have been achieved through improvements in the comprehensive care of these children through large cooperative group studies, even as little progress has been made in the standard chemotherapy backbone. A thorough understanding of the nuances of surgical therapy for these children is required to minimize both the risk of local failure and the possibility of loss of vital form or function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy B Lautz
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University, 225 E Chicago Ave, Box 63, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
| | - Andrea Hayes-Jordan
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, G196 Physician's Office Building, Ground Floor, CB# 7223, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7223, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Indelicato DJ, Rotondo RL, Mailhot Vega RB, Uezono H, Bradfield S, Agarwal V, Hol ML, Bradley JA. 45 GyRBE for group III orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1404-1409. [PMID: 31530120 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1627412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Despite widespread concerns of radiotherapy toxicity in children with head and neck tumors, recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) findings suggest that the use of 45 Gy results in an unacceptably high rate of local recurrences in patients with low-risk orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. We therefore evaluated outcomes in our pediatric patients who received 45 GyRBE using proton therapy. Material and methods: To assess disease control and toxicity, we reviewed the medical records of 30 children (≤21 years old) with COG stage 1, group III embryonal orbital rhabdomyosarcoma enrolled on a prospective outcome study and treated with proton therapy between 2007 and 2018. Results: Median age at the time of radiation was 4.8 years old. Twenty-one and nine patients received ifosfamide- and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy according to their respective cooperative group regimens. Median duration between the start of induction chemotherapy and radiation was 12 weeks. Two patients had a complete response to induction chemotherapy and two had stable disease. Twenty-six patients had a partial response to induction chemotherapy, with a median volume reduction of 66%. With a median follow-up of 4.0 years (range, 0.5-9.5 years), we observed 1 local failure 6 months following treatment in a patient who had a partial response to cyclosphophomide-based induction chemotherapy. The 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 97%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. Serious late toxicities included 18 patients with cataracts, 4 with exposure keratoconjunctivitis resulting in permanently reduced visual acuity, and 1 with chronic sinusitis. Conclusion: 45 GyRBE offers effective local control for most patients with group III orbital rhabdomyosarcoma. The delivery of proton therapy to the postinduction tumor volume plus a small margin can mitigate early- and intermediate-term toxicity, but side effects still occur and long-term data are needed to demonstrate the dosimetric advantage of proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Ronny L. Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Haruka Uezono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Scott Bradfield
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Nemours Children’s Health System, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vibhuti Agarwal
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Nemours Children’s Health System, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Marinka L. Hol
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lucas JT, Pappo AS. Optimal dosing of cyclophosphamide in rhabdomyosarcoma: It's complicated. Cancer 2019; 125:3107-3110. [PMID: 31174230 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John T Lucas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Doyen J, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Frisch S, Schleithoff SS, Vermeren X, Scheer M, Blase C, Tippelt S, Timmermann B. Outcome and Patterns of Relapse in Childhood Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1043-1054. [PMID: 31419513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The standard of care of childhood parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (pRMS) is chemotherapy and local radiation therapy. Protons are increasingly being used to decrease late effects. The aim of the present study is to analyze the pattern of relapse and the correlation with dosimetric factors in pRMS treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective evaluation includes children treated in our institution for pRMS. Information on demographics, treatment, tumor characteristics, and toxicities and outcome was prospectively collected within the in-house registry. For patients presenting with local relapse, a fusion of the dosimetry with magnetic resonance imaging displaying site and geometry of recurrence was performed. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (0.5-4.7). Forty-six patients were identified in our institution between July 2013 and November 2017. Main characteristics of patients were as follows: 56.5% male, median age 5.1 years (1.3-17.5), 39.1% alveolar histology, 26.1%, 52.2%, 8.7%, and 13% patients with subgroup risk classification D, E/F/G, H, or metastatic, respectively, median total prescribed dose 55.8 Gy (50.4-56.4). Estimated 2-year local control, metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival were 83.8%, 87.8%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. No acute or late local toxicity exceeding grade 3 was observed. Risk-group was identified as prognostic factor for metastasis-free survival in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (trend: P = .09). In this cohort, dosimetric factors did not correlate with outcome. Isolated local failure happened in 5 of the 11 relapses. Local relapses were matched with dosimetry for 6 patients: 4 of them occurred in the high dose volume and 2 in the intermediate or low dose volume. CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy was effective and well feasible even in a critical cohort. Still, local relapse within the target volume of the radiation therapy remains an important issue in pRMS and new treatment strategies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Doyen
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, Fédération Claude Lalanne, Nice, France.
| | - Danny Jazmati
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Dirk Geismar
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| | - Sabine Frisch
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Stefanie Schulze Schleithoff
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany
| | - Xavier Vermeren
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Monika Scheer
- Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; Cooperative Weichteilsarkomstudiengruppe (CWS) Olgahospital, Pädiatrisches Zentrum der Landeshauptstadt, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany; Department of Pediatric and Oncology, University Hospital of Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christoph Blase
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany; AnästhesieNetz Rhein-Ruhr, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mandeville H. Radiotherapy in the Management of Childhood Rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:462-470. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.03.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
29
|
Casey DL, Chi YY, Donaldson SS, Hawkins DS, Tian J, Arndt CA, Rodeberg DA, Routh JC, Lautz TB, Gupta AA, Yock TI, Wolden SL. Increased local failure for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST0531: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer 2019; 125:3242-3248. [PMID: 31174239 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate local control for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol ARST0531. METHODS This study analyzed 424 patients with intermediate-risk RMS. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy with either vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine and irinotecan. With the goal of improving local control, radiation therapy (RT) was delivered early at week 4 and was concurrent with irinotecan in the experimental arm. Individualized local control plans for children 24 months old or younger were allowed. Local failure on ARST0531 was compared with local failure on the preceding COG intermediate-risk study, D9803. RESULTS For patients with group I/II alveolar RMS (n = 55), the 5-year cumulative incidence of local failure was 13.4%; for group III alveolar RMS (n = 141), it was 20.2%; and for group III embryonal RMS (n = 228), it was 27.9% (P = .03). Among patients with group III disease, local failure did not differ by histology, site, nodal status, RT modality, or treatment arm. Local failure was worse for a tumor size >5 cm (32.3% vs 16.7%; P = .001). Among patients with group III embryonal RMS, local failure was higher on ARST0531 than D9803 (27.9% vs 19.4%; P = .03). After the exclusion of patients 24 months old or younger or patients who did not receive radiation, local failure remained significantly increased on ARST0531 (P = .02). After adjustments for clinical prognostic factors, event-free survival and overall survival were worse on ARST0531 (P = .004 and P = .05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Despite interventions designed to enhance local control, local control was inferior on ARST0531 in comparison with D9803. The reason for this is unclear, but it could be the reduced cyclophosphamide dose on ARST0531.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jing Tian
- University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Abha A Gupta
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Massachussets General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dombrowski ND, Wolter NE, Irace AL, Cunningham MJ, Mack JW, Marcus KJ, Vargas SO, Perez-Atayde AR, Robson CD, Rahbar R. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 120:93-99. [PMID: 30772619 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare malignant salivary gland neoplasm in the pediatric population. Few studies have discussed best practice with respect to diagnosis and treatment in children. OBJECTIVE To present our institution's experience with the evaluation and management of pediatric mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS Retrospective chart review of patients under 20 years of age diagnosed with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck between 1998 and 2017. Data assessed includes demographics, clinical presentation, imaging examinations, histopathology, treatment, complications, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and follow-up. RESULTS Sixteen patients (10 female, 6 male) were identified with a median age of 12.9 (IQR: 10.9-15.0) years. Tumors were located within the parotid gland (n = 11, 68.8%), accessory lobe of the parotid gland (n = 2, 12.5%), palate (n = 2, 12.5%), and submandibular region (n = 1, 6.3%). In 9 patients (56.3%) a neoplastic etiology was suspected based on the clinical and/or radiographic findings and confirmed pathologically on biopsy or excision. All patients were treated surgically and five patients required adjuvant radiotherapy. One patient had recurrence requiring re-excision. Seven patients (43.8%) had transient facial paresis post-operatively and one had Frey syndrome. Median follow-up time was 59.7 months (IQR: 18.9-99.3). CONCLUSION The malignant nature of mucoepidermoid carcinoma requires comprehensive, multidisciplinary management. Imaging and tissue sampling by fine needle aspiration give clinicians the best insight into location and nature of the mass. Complete surgical excision with attention to preservation of facial nerve and achieving negative margins is desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha D Dombrowski
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Nikolaus E Wolter
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexandria L Irace
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Michael J Cunningham
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Jennifer W Mack
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Sara O Vargas
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Antonio R Perez-Atayde
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Caroline D Robson
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Reza Rahbar
- Department of Otolaryngology & Communication Enhancement, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, United States; Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chang L, Enriquez M, Lerman N, Wilson-Smith R. High grade sarcoma, with predominant neuroectodermal and minor embryonal rhabdomyosarcomatous tumor of the uterus: A case report. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2019; 28:128-132. [PMID: 31032392 PMCID: PMC6479011 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There have been few documented cases of combined primitive neuroectodermal and embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (ERMS) in the uterus. Due to their rarity, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients with primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) and ERMS of the uterus. Studies on treatment and outcome are limited. Case presentation A 32 year-old female presented with heavy vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound revealed an 18 cm uterus with thickened endometrium. Histopathology revealed embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. She underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, lymph node dissection, and omentectomy. Pathologic review confirmed a tumor with mainly central-type PNET and focally ERMS within the uterus and cervix. She was treated with adjuvant chemoradiation. Conclusion Treatment of the predominant tumor, PNET, should be the primary goal of therapy. Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide with tumor directed radiation may be efficacious for the treatment of this specific high grade uterine sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leona Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Cooper University Health System, Camden, NJ, USA
- Corresponding author at: Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cooper University Hospital, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 221, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
| | - Miriam Enriquez
- Department of Pathology, Cooper University Health System, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Nati Lerman
- Department of Hematology/Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Cooper University Health System, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Robin Wilson-Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Cooper University Health System, Camden, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Casey DL, Wexler LH, Wolden SL. Worse Outcomes for Head and Neck Rhabdomyosarcoma Secondary to Reduced-Dose Cyclophosphamide. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:1151-1157. [PMID: 30508617 PMCID: PMC6441953 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent trends, including the use of proton therapy and administration of reduced doses of cyclophosphamide, have been adapted in head and neck (HN) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) to reduce late morbidity. Our primary goal was to analyze local control and survival outcomes after photon versus proton irradiation in pediatric patients with HN-RMS, with the secondary goal of analyzing the effect of cyclophosphamide dose on disease outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS This single-institution cohort study comprised 76 pediatric HN-RMS patients treated with definitive chemoradiation from 2000 to 2018. Fifty-one patients (67%) received intensity modulated photon radiation therapy, and 25 (33%) received proton therapy. RESULTS Local failure (LF) at 2 years was 12.5% for parameningeal RMS and 0% for orbital RMS and other head and neck sites (P = .24). Patients treated with protons were more likely to have received reduced-dose cyclophosphamide (P < .0001). The 2-year LF was 7.9% in the intensity modulated photon radiation therapy cohort versus 14.6% in the proton cohort (P = .07), with no difference in survival outcomes. Cumulative cyclophosphamide dose was significantly associated with 2-year LF: 0% for cumulative dose of >20 g/m2 versus 15.3% for ≤20 g/m2 (P = .04). In parameningeal RMS patients (n = 59), both cumulative cyclophosphamide dose and dose intensity were associated with LF (P = .01). There was a trend toward worse event-free survival for parameningeal RMS patients who received reduced-dose-intensity cyclophosphamide (59.2% vs 70.6%, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS Both dose-intensity and cumulative cyclophosphamide dose seem to play an important role in achieving local control for HN-RMS patients treated with either protons or photons. Longer follow-up is needed to further assess disease outcomes with proton therapy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Combined Modality Therapy/methods
- Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
- Female
- Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality
- Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy
- Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery
- Humans
- Male
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
- Proton Therapy/adverse effects
- Proton Therapy/methods
- Proton Therapy/statistics & numerical data
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/statistics & numerical data
- Relative Biological Effectiveness
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/drug therapy
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/mortality
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/radiotherapy
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar/surgery
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal/drug therapy
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal/mortality
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal/radiotherapy
- Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal/surgery
- Treatment Outcome
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Leonard H Wexler
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 117:131-137. [PMID: 30579067 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To discuss the presentation, evaluation, and management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in the pediatric population. METHODS Medical records of pediatric (≤20 years) patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck between 1996 and 2016 were reviewed. Data pertaining to clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment plan, complications, recurrence, follow-up, or outcome were collected. RESULTS Eleven patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma. Seven of these patients had medical histories significant for prior malignancies, immunosuppressant therapy, and/or genetic syndromes. Lesions were identified in the oral cavity (n = 5, 45.5%), lip/upper lip (n = 3, 27.3%), larynx (n = 2, 18.2%), and nasal cavity (n = 1, 9.1%). Tumors were most commonly treated with surgical excision alone. Three patients underwent irradiation (2 adjuvant and 1 without surgery) and chemotherapy (1 adjuvant, 1 neoadjuvant, and 1 without surgery). Of these patients, one reported complications of hearing loss, loss of dentition, and laryngeal stenosis. Two patients developed local recurrence at 1 month and 5 years post-operatively, respectively. One patient developed an orocutaneous fistula and subsequently died. No other complications were reported. Median follow-up time was 4.6 years (interquartile range: 2.4-8.4 years). Complications of radiation included: laryngeal stenosis, wound breakdown, and orocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSION Squamous cell carcinoma is rare in the pediatric population. Most frequently, it is associated with previous malignancies, immunosuppressant therapy, and/or genetic conditions. Complete surgical excision is recommended to obviate the need for radiation whenever possible.
Collapse
|
34
|
Sari SY, Yazici G, Gultekin M, Hurmuz P, Gurkaynak M, Ozyigit G. Sarcoma. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
35
|
Hawkins DS, Chi YY, Anderson JR, Tian J, Arndt CAS, Bomgaars L, Donaldson SS, Hayes-Jordan A, Mascarenhas L, McCarville MB, McCune JS, McCowage G, Million L, Morris CD, Parham DM, Rodeberg DA, Rudzinski ER, Shnorhavorian M, Spunt SL, Skapek SX, Teot LA, Wolden S, Yock TI, Meyer WH. Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2770-2777. [PMID: 30091945 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.77.9694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) includes patients with either nonmetastatic, unresected embryonal RMS (ERMS) with an unfavorable primary site or nonmetastatic alveolar RMS (ARMS). The primary aim of this study was to improve the outcome of patients with intermediate-risk RMS by substituting vincristine and irinotecan (VI) for half of vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) courses. All patients received a lower dose of cyclophosphamide and earlier radiation therapy than in previous trials. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at study entry to either VAC (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 16.8 g/m2) or VAC/VI (cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, 8.4 g/m2) for 42 weeks of therapy. Radiation therapy started at week 4, with individualized local control plans permitted for patients younger than 24 months. The primary study end point was event-free survival (EFS). The study design had an 80% power (5% one-sided α-level) to detect an improved long-term EFS from 65% (with VAC) to 76% (with VAC/VI). Results A total of 448 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. At a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the 4-year EFS was 63% with VAC and 59% with VAC/VI ( P = .51), and 4-year overall survival was 73% for VAC and 72% for VAC/VI ( P = .80). Within the ARMS and ERMS subgroups, no difference in outcome by treatment arm was found. Severe hematologic toxicity was less common with VAC/VI therapy. Conclusion The addition of VI to VAC did not improve EFS or OS for patients with intermediate-risk RMS. VAC/VI had less hematologic toxicity and a lower cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, making VAC/VI an alternative standard therapy for intermediate-risk RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas S Hawkins
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Yueh-Yun Chi
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - James R Anderson
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Jing Tian
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Carola A S Arndt
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Lisa Bomgaars
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Sarah S Donaldson
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Andrea Hayes-Jordan
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Leo Mascarenhas
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Mary Beth McCarville
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Jeannine S McCune
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Geoff McCowage
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Lynn Million
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Carol D Morris
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - David M Parham
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - David A Rodeberg
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Erin R Rudzinski
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Margarett Shnorhavorian
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Sheri L Spunt
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Stephen X Skapek
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Lisa A Teot
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - William H Meyer
- Douglas S. Hawkins, Erin R. Rudzinski, and Margarett Shnorhavorian, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA; Yueh-Yun Chi and Jing Tian, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; James R. Anderson, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA; Carola A.S. Arndt, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Lisa Bomgaars, Texas Children's Hospital; Andrea Hayes-Jordan, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; Stephen X. Skapek, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Sarah S. Donaldson, Lynn Million, and Sheri L. Spunt, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Leo Mascarenhas and David M. Parham, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jeannine S. McCune, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mary Beth McCarville, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Geoff McCowage, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Carol D. Morris, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, David A. Rodeberg, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Lisa A. Teot, Boston Children's Hospital; Torunn I. Yock, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Suzanne Wolden, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and William H. Meyer, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wexler LH. When treatment does not work: failure to understand failure. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1004-1006. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30513-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 07/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
37
|
Breneman JC, Donaldson SS, Constine L, Merchant T, Marcus K, Paulino AC, Followill D, Mahajan A, Laack N, Esiashvili N, Haas-Kogan D, Laurie F, Olch A, Ulin K, Hodgson D, Yock TI, Terezakis S, Krasin M, Panoff J, Chuba P, Hua CH, Hess CB, Houghton PJ, Wolden S, Buchsbaum J, Fitzgerald TJ, Kalapurakal JA. The Children's Oncology Group Radiation Oncology Discipline: 15 Years of Contributions to the Treatment of Childhood Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:860-874. [PMID: 29976498 PMCID: PMC6548440 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to review the advances in radiation therapy for the management of pediatric cancers made by the Children's Oncology Group (COG) radiation oncology discipline since its inception in 2000. METHODS AND MATERIALS The various radiation oncology disease site leaders reviewed the contributions and advances in pediatric oncology made through the work of the COG. They have presented outcomes of relevant studies and summarized current treatment policies developed by consensus from experts in the field. RESULTS The indications and techniques for pediatric radiation therapy have evolved considerably over the years for virtually all pediatric tumor types, resulting in improved cure rates together with the potential for decreased treatment-related morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS The COG radiation oncology discipline has made significant contributions toward the treatment of childhood cancer. Our discipline is committed to continuing research to refine and modernize the use of radiation therapy in current and future protocols with the goal of further improving the cure rates and quality of life of children with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Sarah S Donaldson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Louis Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Thomas Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karen Marcus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Followill
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Houston Quality Assurance Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nadia Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Radiation Oncology Department, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fran Laurie
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Rhode Island, Lincoln, Rhode Island
| | - Arthur Olch
- Radiation Oncology Program, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kenneth Ulin
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Rhode Island, Lincoln, Rhode Island; University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Hodgson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matt Krasin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Paul Chuba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Clayton B Hess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter J Houghton
- Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Suzanne Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | | | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Rhode Island, Lincoln, Rhode Island
| | - John A Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vogel J, Both S, Kirk M, Chao HH, Bagatell R, Li Y, Womer R, Balamuth N, Reilly A, Kurtz G, Lustig R, Tochner Z, Hill-Kayser C. Proton therapy for pediatric head and neck malignancies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65. [PMID: 29058370 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pediatric head and neck malignancies are managed with intensive multimodality therapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce toxicity by limiting exposure of normal tissue to radiation. In this study, we report acute toxicities and early outcomes following PBT for pediatric head and neck malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2010 and 2016, pediatric patients with nonhematologic malignancies of the head and neck were treated with PBT. Clinical and dosimetric data were abstracted from the medical record and treatment planning system with institutional review board approval. RESULTS Sixty-nine consecutive pediatric patients were treated with proton-based radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies. Thirty-five were treated for rhabdomyosarcoma to a median dose of 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]. Ten patients were treated for Ewing sarcoma to a median dose of 55.8 Gy[RBE]. Twenty-four patients were treated for other histologies to a median dose of 63.0 Gy[RBE]. Grade 3 oral mucositis, anorexia, and dysphagia were reported to be 4, 22, and 7%, respectively. Actuarial 1-year freedom from local recurrence was 92% (95% CI 80-97). Actuarial 1-year overall survival was 93% (95% CI 79-98) in the entire cohort. Oral cavity mucositis was significantly correlated with oral cavity dose (D80 and D50 [P < 0.05], where D80 and D50 are dose to 50% of the volume and dose to 80% of the volume, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this study, we report low rates of acute toxicity in a cohort of pediatric patients with head and neck malignancies. PBT appears safe for this patient population, with local control rates similar to historical reports. Longer follow-up will be required to evaluate late toxicity and long-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Both
- Medical Physics Department, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maura Kirk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Hann-Hsiang Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rochelle Bagatell
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yimei Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Womer
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Naomi Balamuth
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anne Reilly
- Department of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Zelig Tochner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Casey DL, Wolden SL. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the Head and Neck: A Multimodal Approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79:58-64. [PMID: 29404242 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1617450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) is a uniquely challenging site to treat given the young patient age and critical anatomy of the head and neck region. We review the characteristics, management, and future directions in the treatment of HNRMS. Most patients who present with HNRMS have unresectable disease due to functional and/or cosmetic constraints. However, surgical resection and brachytherapy serve a critical role in select patients. The treatment paradigm for the majority of patients with HNRMS consists of definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. As the incidence of late toxicities increases with improved survival, modern efforts must focus on ways to decrease long-term morbidity. We recommend a multimodal approach emphasizing the preservation of form and function for the treatment of HNRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Ermoian RP, Breneman J, Walterhouse DO, Chi YY, Meza J, Anderson J, Hawkins DS, Hayes-Jordan AA, Parham DM, Yock TI, Donaldson SS, Wolden SL. 45 Gy is not sufficient radiotherapy dose for Group III orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma after less than complete response to 12 weeks of ARST0331 chemotherapy: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64:10.1002/pbc.26540. [PMID: 28548706 PMCID: PMC5568701 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Revised: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials tested the efficacy of reduced therapy in an effort to lessen late effects compared to the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) IV regimen with associated hematologic and hepatic toxicity, and infertility. Here, we analyze the efficacy of 45 Gray (Gy) local radiotherapy (RT) in patients with Group III orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) enrolled on the COG low-risk study ARST0331. PROCEDURE Sixty-two patients with Group III orbital ERMS were treated on ARST0331 with four cycles of vincristine (VCR), dactinomycin (DACT), and cyclophosphamide (CPM; VAC, total cumulative CPM dose 4.8 g/m2 ) followed by four cycles of VCR and DACT over 22 weeks. Forty-five Gray of radiation was administered in 25 fractions beginning at week 13 of therapy. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were evaluable for this response analysis; seven had missing week 12 response evaluation data and two had progressive disease prior to starting RT. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. None of the 15 patients with radiographic complete response (CR) compared to 6 of the 38 patients with CONCLUSIONS For patients with Group III orbital ERMS achieving a CR following VAC chemotherapy that includes modest dose CPM, 45 Gy may be sufficient for durable failure-free survival. However, for those with
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph P. Ermoian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Washington
| | - John Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David O. Walterhouse
- Department of Pediatrics-Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Northwestern University, Illinois
| | - Yueh-Yun Chi
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Florida
| | - Jane Meza
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska, Nebraska
| | - James Anderson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska, Nebraska
| | | | - Andrea A. Hayes-Jordan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas
| | - David M. Parham
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, California
| | - Torunn I. Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah S. Donaldson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California
| | - Suzanne L. Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Spalteholz M, Gulow J. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma infiltrating thoracic spine in a 59-year-old female patient: Case report. GMS INTERDISCIPLINARY PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY DGPW 2017; 6:Doc11. [PMID: 28868225 PMCID: PMC5525316 DOI: 10.3205/iprs000113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) represents a malignant tumor of skeletal muscle cells arising from rhabdomyoblasts. RMS represents the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children. In adults it is uncommon and accounts for less than 1% of all malignant solid tumors. While treatment protocols are well known for children, there is no standardized regimen in adults. This is one reason, why the outcome in adults is worse than in children. We present the case of a 59-year-old female patient with pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) infiltrating the thoracic spine. Multimodality treatment was performed including en-bloc resection, adjuvant multidrug chemotherapy and radiation beam therapy. The patient was tumor free and had no relapse within 6 month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Gulow
- Department of Spine Surgery, Helios Park-Klinikum, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fu L, Jin Y, Jia C, Zhang J, Tai J, Li H, Chen F, Shi J, Guo Y, Ni X, He L. Detection of FOXO1 break-apart status by fluorescence in situ hybridization in atypical alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s11427-017-9082-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
44
|
Liu Y, Kou C, Su Y, Zhang Y, You Y, Zhang L, Wang M, Fu Y, Ren X, Yang Y. Accelerated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Onco Targets Ther 2017; 10:2971-2981. [PMID: 28652779 PMCID: PMC5476713 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s137474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified (accelerated and/or hyperfractionated) radiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma, compared with conventional radiotherapy. Methods Studies published in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI and Wanfang databases in the most recent two decades were searched for use in this meta-analysis. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The heterogeneity analysis and calculation of the pooled odds ratio (OR) were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The assessment of publication bias and sensitivity analyses was conducted using Stata 13.0 software. Results Twenty trials with a total of 1,742 Chinese patients who met the inclusion criteria were included. The pooled results showed that modified radiotherapy improved the response rate compared with conventional schedules (OR =3.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.47–6.16, P<0.001). Favorable results were observed for the 1-year (OR =2.58, 95% CI: 2.05–3.26, P<0.001), 3-year (OR =2.30, 95% CI: 1.83–2.89, P<0.001) and 5-year (OR =2.36, 95% CI: 1.74–3.21, P<0.001) overall survival and for the 1-year (OR =2.46, 95% CI: 1.72–3.51, P<0.001), 3-year (OR =2.08, 95% CI: 1.49–2.90, P<0.001) and 5-year (OR =2.15, 95% CI: 1.38–3.34, P<0.001) overall local control rate in the modified fractionation radiotherapy group. However, the altered radiotherapy increased the risk of acute radiation esophagitis (OR =1.70, 95% CI: 1.27–2.28, P<0.001) and acute radiation tracheitis (OR =1.47, 95% CI: 1.09–1.99, P=0.01). No significant differences in the risk of esophageal perforation (OR =1.30, 95% CI: 0.51–3.32, P=0.58) or esophagorrhagia (OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.41–1.88, P=0.74) were found between the two groups. Conclusion Chinese patients with squamous cell esophagus carcinomas gained a significant benefit in terms of the response rate, survival and local control rates from the modified fractionation radiotherapy, but also had an increased risk of acute radiation reactions. Otherwise, there was no observed statistically significant difference in terms of early adverse reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyu Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Changgui Kou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Yingying Su
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Yangyu Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Yueyue You
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Lili Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Mohan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Yingli Fu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University
| | - Xiaojun Ren
- Department of Radiotherapy, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanming Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Stepan K, Konuthula N, Khan M, Parasher A, Del Signore A, Govindaraj S, Genden E, Iloreta A. Outcomes in Adult Sinonasal Rhabdomyosarcoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017; 157:135-141. [PMID: 28669309 DOI: 10.1177/0194599817696287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective To describe patient demographics, histology, treatment modalities, and survival associated with adult sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma. Study Design Retrospective review of a national database. Setting Tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods Patient demographics, tumor histology, treatment modalities, and survival trends were examined for patients aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma between 2004 and 2013 with the National Cancer Database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank tests were performed to determine the unadjusted association between overall survival and various patient and disease characteristics. Results A total of 186 patients were identified; 5-year overall survival was 28.4%. Over half of patients were between 18 and 35 years old at diagnosis (53.8%), which was associated with improved 5-year overall survival over patients >35 years old (31.9% vs 24.4%, P = .014). Alveolar sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma was most common (66.7%). There was no statistical difference in 5-year overall survival between alveolar and embryonal subtypes (30.5% vs 41.6%, P > .05). Metastatic disease was present in 27.7% of patients and was associated with worse 5-year overall survival (14.7% vs 33.9%, P < .0001). The majority of patients were treated with chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation (49.5%). A quarter of patients were treated with surgery plus chemoradiation (25.8%). Conclusion We present the largest analysis of adult sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma using a standardized national based database. Adult sinonasal rhabdomyosarcoma has a very poor prognosis independent of histologic subtype. The small number of surgical cases limits the ability of the analysis to accurately compare treatment with chemoradiation with and without surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn Stepan
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Neeraja Konuthula
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Arjun Parasher
- 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anthony Del Signore
- 3 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Eric Genden
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Alfred Iloreta
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Adherence to Treatment, Response and Patterns of Failure in Pediatric Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma: Experience From a Tertiary Cancer Care Center From India. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39:e62-e68. [PMID: 28060113 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The study was aimed at evaluating adherence to treatment protocol and outcome in pediatric parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PM-RMS). We analyzed the characteristics, treatment administered, outcomes and patterns of failure of pediatric PM-RMS, who were treated with multimodality therapy between January 2005 and December 2013.Univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) was completed to evaluate the impact of various prognostic factors. Thirty-seven patients were treated at our institution. Majority of them had the primary disease in paranasal sinuses (n=13). Majority of the patients belonged to group III (n=30) and stage III (n=24). The overall response rate to treatment was 52.5% (n=21). At a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, 23 patients developed disease progression. The actuarial rates of failure-free survival and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 40% and 67.5%, respectively. Patients who received >20 weeks of intended chemotherapy schedule (P=0.02) and had complete response to first-line treatment (P=0.0004) were found to have superior failure-free survival on MVA. Complete response was the lone determinant of superior OS on MVA (P=0.006). Majority of patients with PM-RMS present with advanced stage disease. Response to first-line treatment is a significant predictor of superior progression-free survival and OS in these patients.
Collapse
|
47
|
Strategies to Overcome Late Complications from Radiotherapy for Childhood Head and Neck Cancers. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2016; 28:115-26. [PMID: 26614704 DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Most pediatric head and neck cancers are treated with radiotherapy, but the morbidity associated with radiotherapy has become a prominent issue. This article discusses the common long-term complications associated with head and neck radiotherapy for childhood cancers. It reviews approaches to minimize toxicity and details the toxicities that head and neck radiation inflicts on relevant functional measures. In addition, it discusses the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers in childhood cancer survivors, as well as strategies to reduce them. Thus, this article addresses approaches to minimize long-term radiation toxicities in order to improve the quality of life for childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
|
48
|
Schildhaus HU, Lokka S, Fenner W, Küster J, Kühnle I, Heinmöller E. Spindle cell embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate in an adult patient - case report and review of clinicopathological features. Diagn Pathol 2016; 11:56. [PMID: 27357857 PMCID: PMC4928285 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-016-0507-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate in an adult is a very rare event with only a few cases published. Diagnosis usually occurs with advanced disease frequently already with metastatic spread. In adults prognosis is very poor, therefore early diagnosis is crucial. To date, only three cases of spindle cell subtype of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate in an adult have been published. Case presentation We report an additional case of prostatic spindle cell embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma subtype in an adult. Conclusions We discuss relevant clinicopathological features of spindle cell embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the prostate in adult patients in the context of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suvi Lokka
- Institute of Pathology Nordhessen, Germaniastr. 7, 34119, Kassel, Germany
| | - Werner Fenner
- Deparment of Urology, Nephrologisches Zentrum, Vogelsang 105, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany
| | - Jens Küster
- Deparment of Urology, Nephrologisches Zentrum, Vogelsang 105, 34346, Hann. Münden, Germany
| | - Ingrid Kühnle
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ernst Heinmöller
- Institute of Pathology Nordhessen, Germaniastr. 7, 34119, Kassel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wolden SL, Lyden ER, Arndt CA, Hawkins DS, Anderson JR, Rodeberg DA, Morris CD, Donaldson SS. Local Control for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Results From D9803 According to Histology, Group, Site, and Size: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:1071-6. [PMID: 26581144 PMCID: PMC5147527 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2015] [Revised: 08/19/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine local control according to clinical variables for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated on Children's Oncology Group protocol D9803. PATIENTS AND METHODS Of 702 patients enrolled, we analyzed 423 patients with central pathology-confirmed group III embryonal (n=280) or alveolar (group III, n=102; group I-II, n=41) RMS. Median age was 5 years. Patients received 42 weeks of VAC (vincristine, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide) or VAC alternating with VTC (T = topotecan). Local therapy with 50.4 Gy radiation therapy with or without delayed primary excision began at week 12 for group III patients. Patients with group I/II alveolar RMS received 36-41.4 Gy. Local failure (LF) was defined as local progression as a first event with or without concurrent regional or distant failure. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 6.6 years, patients with clinical group I/II alveolar RMS had a 5-year event-free survival rate of 69% and LF of 10%. Among patients with group III RMS, 5-year event-free survival and LF rates were 70% and 19%, respectively. Local failure rates did not differ by histology, nodal status, or primary site, though there was a trend for increased LF for retroperitoneal (RP) tumors (P=.12). Tumors ≥5 cm were more likely to fail locally than tumors <5 cm (25% vs 10%, P=.0004). Almost all (98%) RP tumors were ≥5 cm, with no difference in LF by site when the analysis was restricted to tumors ≥5 cm (P=.86). CONCLUSION Local control was excellent for clinical group I/II alveolar RMS. Local failure constituted 63% of initial events in clinical group III patients and did not vary by histology or nodal status. The trend for higher LF in RP tumors was related to tumor size. There has been no clear change in local control over RMS studies, including IRS-III and IRS-IV. Novel approaches are warranted for larger tumors (≥5 cm).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Elizabeth R Lyden
- Department of Preventive and Societal Medicine, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Carola A Arndt
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James R Anderson
- Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - David A Rodeberg
- Department of Surgery, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina
| | - Carol D Morris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sarah S Donaldson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Oberlin O, Rey A, Brown KL, Bisogno G, Koscielniak E, Stevens MC, Hawkins DS, Meyer WH, La TH, Carli M, Anderson JR. Prognostic Factors for Outcome in Localized Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma. Pooled Analysis from Four International Cooperative Groups. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015; 62:2125-31. [PMID: 26257045 PMCID: PMC5002346 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extremity rhabdomyosarcomas do not always show satisfactory outcomes. We analyzed data from 643 patients treated in 14 studies conducted by European and North American groups between 1983 and 2004 to identify factors predictive of outcome. PROCEDURE Clinical factors, including age; histology; site of primary (hand and foot vs. other); size; invasiveness (T stage); nodal involvement (N stage); and treatment factors, including post-surgical group; chemotherapy type and duration; radiotherapy; and treatment (before or after 1995); were evaluated for impact on overall survival (OS). RESULTS 5-year OS were 67% (se 1.8). Multivariate analysis showed that lower OS correlated with age >3 years, T2 and N1 stage, incomplete initial surgery, treatment before 1995, and European cooperative group treatment. Patients with gross residual disease after initial incomplete resection/biopsy had similar outcomes in both continental groups. The better global survival of patients treated in American studies was accounted for by differences in outcome in the subset of those with grossly resected tumors (OS 86% [se 3] for COG patients vs. 68% [se 4] for European patients (P = 0.004)). When excluding chemotherapy duration from the model, analysis in this subset of patients showed that cooperative group (P = 0.001), site (P = 0.001), and T stage (P = 0.05) were all significant. However, after adding duration of chemotherapy (≥27 weeks) to the model, only primary site remained significant (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis confirms the role of many established prognostic factors but identifies for the first time that chemotherapy duration may have an impact on outcome in patients with grossly resected tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Odile Oberlin
- Departments of Pediatrics and Biostatistics, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France,Correspondence to: Odile Oberlin, Department of Pediatrics, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114, rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France,
| | - Annie Rey
- Departments of Pediatrics and Biostatistics, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Kenneth L.B. Brown
- Departments of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Gianni Bisogno
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Ewa Koscielniak
- Pediatric 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunolgy), Olga Hospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Michael C.G. Stevens
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - Douglas S. Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - William H. Meyer
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Trang H. La
- Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Permanente-Oakland, Oakland, California
| | - Modesto Carli
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - James R. Anderson
- Department of Preventive and Societal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|