Long-term control of T2-T3 rectal adenocarcinoma with radiotherapy alone

Immunotherapy and radiotherapy for older patients with locally advanced rectal cancer unfit for surgery or decline surgery: a practical proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is total neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Current evidence suggests that selected patients may be able to delay or avoid surgery without affecting survival rates if they achieve a complete clinical response (CCR). However, for older cancer patients who are too frail for surgery or decline the surgical procedure, local recurrence may lead to a deterioration of patient quality of life. Thus, for clinicians, a treatment algorithm which is well tolerated and may improve CCR in older and frail patients with rectal cancer may improve the potential for prolonged remission and potential cure. Recently, immunotherapy with check point inhibitors (CPI) is a promising treatment in selected patients with high expression of program death ligands receptor 1 (PD- L1). Radiotherapy may enhance PD-L1 expression in rectal cancer and may improve response rate to immunotherapy. We propose an algorithm combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy for older patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who are too frail for surgery or who decline surgery.

High dose chemoradiotherapy increases chance of organ preservation with satisfactory functional outcome for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

High dose chemoradiotherapy offers a curative chance for patients with rectal cancer that are unfit or unwilling to undergo surgical resection, yet its long-term survival and functional outcomes have been rarely investigated.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who received pelvic radiation for curative intent from April 2006 to July 2017 were retrospectively investigated. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Quality of life and functional outcomes were evaluated using the EORTC quality of life questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients were included, with a median age of 59.0 (range, 29-84) years. The numbers of patients who were diagnosed as stage I, II and III were 5 (8.8%), 16 (28.1%) and 36 (63.2%), respectively. 53 (93.0%) patients had tumor located within 5 cm from the anal verge. All patients received fluorouracil-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a median radiation dose of 80 (range, 60-86) Gy. All kinds of grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 18 (31.6%) patients. 42 (73.7%) patients achieved a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 43.5 (range 14.9-163.2) months, 12 (21.1%) patients had local progression and 11 (19.3%) developed distant metastasis. The 3-year local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were 77.3% (95% CI, 65.7-88.8%) and 79.2% (95% CI, 68.2-90.2%), while the 3-year progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival were 61.9% (95% CI, 48.8-75.0%), 93.1% (95% CI, 85.8-100.0%) and 91.4% (95% CI, 83.6-99.2%), respectively. For patients who had tumor located within 3 cm from the anal verge, the sphincter preservation rate was 85.3% at last follow-up. Long-term adverse events mainly were anal blood loss. 21 patients completed the quality-of-life questionnaire and had a score of the global health status of 78.57 ± 17.59. Of them, 95.2% reported no urinary incontinence and 85.7% reported no fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose chemoradiation demonstrated promising survival outcomes with acceptable short-term and long-term side effects, and satisfying long-term functional outcomes and quality of life. It could be considered as a non-invasive alternative for rectal cancer patients who refuse surgery.

GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations for contact brachytherapy for rectal cancer

•

CXB appears to be an efficacious technique for rectal cancer treatment and may allow rectal preservation in selected patients.

•

These GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations recommend dose schemes in for rectal CXB.

•

These recommendations advise reporting of tumour depth to enable future refinement of dose prescription and target definition.

•

The routine collection and publication of outcome data including patient reported outcomes (PROs) is recommended.

Purpose

To issue consensus recommendations for contact X-Ray brachytherapy (CXB) for rectal cancer covering pre-treatment evaluation, treatment, dosimetric issues and follow-up. These recommendations cover CXB in the definitive and palliative setting.

Methods

Members of GEC ESTRO with expertise in rectal CXB issued consensus-based recommendations for CXB based on literature review and clinical experience. Levels of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence based medicine guidance are presented where possible.

Results

The GEC ESTRO ACROP consensus recommendations support the use of CXB to increase the chances of clinical complete remission and cure for patients who are elderly with high surgical risk, surgically unfit or refusing surgery. For palliative treatment, the use of CXB is recommended for symptomatic relief and disease control. The use of CXB in an organ-preservation setting in surgically fit patients is recommended within the setting of a clinical trial or registry.

Conclusions

The GEC ESTRO ACROP recommendations for CXB are provided. Recommendations towards standardisation of reporting and prescription are given. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these recommendations and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality and increase the evidence base for its use. The routine collection of outcomes both clinical and patient-reported is also encouraged.

What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older?

The current recommendation to stop colorectal cancer screening for older adults is based on a lack of evidence due to systematic exclusion of this population from trials. Older adults are a heterogenous population with many available strategies for patient-centered assessment and decision-making. Evolutions in management strategies for colorectal cancer have made safe and effective options available to older adults, and the rationale to screen for treatable disease more reasonably, especially given the aging Canadian population. In this commentary, we review the current screening guidelines and the evidence upon which they were built, the unique considerations for screening older adults, new treatment options, the risks and benefits of increased screening and potential considerations for the new guidelines.

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Treatment Approach in Elderly Patients

Independently of age, evidence-based guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary treatment approach in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). But actually, elderly patients are grossly underrepresented in clinical trials, accounting < 10% of enrolled cases. Therefore, LARC management in elderly patients remains a crucial issue in daily practice, especially due to their frailty. Multiple clinical factors, including general health status, cognitive status, co-morbidity, disability, and life expectancy should be considered to understand the complexities of geriatric assessment and then define therapy. We use a patient-centered approach in order to tailor the optimal treatment strategy. We treat fit elderly patients as younger patients, including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy. Whereas, in vulnerable and frail patients, we propose standard CRT (vulnerable patients) or radiotherapy alone (frail patients).

Image Guided Adaptive Endorectal Brachytherapy in the Nonoperative Management of Patients With Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Organ preservation or nonoperative management of rectal cancer is of growing interest. Image guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy is a radiation dose escalation modality: we explored its role in elderly patients unfit for surgery and patients refusing surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this registry study, patients with rectal cancer who were ineligible for surgery received 40 Gy in 16 fractions of pelvic external beam radiation therapy. They subsequently received 3 weekly image guided adaptive brachytherapy boosts of 10 Gy to the residual tumor, for a total of 30 Gy in 3 fractions. Complete clinical response (cCR) and local control were the primary endpoints.

RESULTS

94 patients were included; the median age was 81.1 years. With a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the proportion of cCR was 86.2%, the tumor regrowth proportion was 13.6%, and the cumulative incidence of local relapse was 2.7% at 1 year and 16.8% at 2 years. When considering responders and nonresponders, the 2-year local control was 71.5%. The overall survival at 2 years was 63.6%. Acute rectal grade 1 to 2 toxicity included all patients: 12.8% of patients had late bleeding requiring iron replacement, blood transfusions, or argon plasma therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this registry study, evaluating radiation dose escalation for elderly medically unfit patients with unselected tumors, reveal that a high proportion of patients achieved cCR with a manageable toxicity profile. This technology will likely contribute to the challenging nonoperative management paradigm of rectal cancer.

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer in the elderly: a critical review and algorithm

Colorectal cancer incidence and death rates have been declining over the past 10 years. However, it remains the second leading cause of death in men ages 60-79 and the third leading cause of death in men over 80 and in women over 60 years old. However, there is little data specific to the treatment of the elder patient, since few of these patients are included in trials. With the advent of improved therapies, there are many alternative options available. Still, no definitive consensus or guidelines have been defined for this particular patient population. The goal of this study is to review the literature on the management of rectal cancer in the elderly and to propose treatment algorithms to help the oncology team in treatment decision-making.

Decision-Making Strategy for Rectal Cancer Management Using Radiation Therapy for Elderly or Comorbid Patients

Rectal cancer predominantly affects patients older than 70 years, with peak incidence at age 80 to 85 years. However, the standard treatment paradigm for rectal cancer oftentimes cannot be feasibly applied to these patients owing to frailty or comorbid conditions. There are currently little information and no treatment guidelines to help direct therapy for patients who are elderly and/or have significant comorbidities, because most are not included or specifically studied in clinical trials. More recently various alternative treatment options have been brought to light that may potentially be utilized in this group of patients. This critical review examines the available literature on alternative therapies for rectal cancer and proposes a treatment algorithm to help guide clinicians in treatment decision making for elderly and comorbid patients.

Advances in organ preserving strategies in rectal cancer patients

Treatment of rectal cancer patients has been subjected to change over the past thirty years. Total mesorectal excision is considered the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, but is also associated with significant morbidity resulting in an impaired quality of life. The addition of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery has shown to improve survival and local control and may lead to a partial or even complete response (CR). This raises questions regarding the necessity for subsequent radical surgery. After careful patient selection local excision and wait-and-see approaches are explored, aiming to improve quality of life without compromising oncological outcome. A multimodality diagnostic approach for optimal staging is crucial in determining the appropriate neoadjuvant treatment regimen. Adequate endoscopic restaging of rectal tumours after multimodality treatment will aid in selecting patients who are eligible for an organ preserving approach. The role and accuracy of imaging in the detection of the primary tumour, residual rectal cancer or local recurrence seems vital. Alternative neoadjuvant regimens are currently explored to increase the rate of clinical CRs, which may support organ preserving approaches. This review aims to generate insight into the advances in diagnostics and treatment modalities in all stages of rectal cancer and will highlight future studies that may support further implementation of organ preservation treatment in rectal cancer.

Inflatable multichannel rectal applicator for adaptive image-guided endoluminal high-dose-rate rectal brachytherapy: design, dosimetric characteristics, and first clinical experiences

Purpose

To investigate the dosimetric results and first clinical experiences with a new designed balloon applicator with adjustable catheters for endoluminal brachytherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer not undergoing surgery.

Material and methods

The applicator consists of an inflatable rectal balloon with six attached Foley catheters used as guidance for the inserted brachytherapy plastic needles. The construction of the applicator and the dosimetric profile in terms of representative dose points in 0, 2, 5, 10 mm ipsilaterally and in 0 mm contralaterally are described. The first clinical outcomes in three patients are reported.

Results

For all three patients, a reproducible dose gradient was achieved. The surface dose on the target side was 204 ± 19% of the normalized dose in 5 mm (100%) tissue depth, and 143 ± 8% in 2 mm and 64 ± 3% in 10 mm tissue depth, while the surface dose on the contra-lateral side was 20 ± 8%. After radiochemotherapy with 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy and concomitant administration of capecitabine, a HDR brachytherapy boost in 2-3 fractions of 7-10 Gy each was delivered. All patients achieved a clinical complete response 3 month after the treatment, and no major toxicity was observed.

Conclusion

The use of the applicator was clinically feasible, and resulted in a stable and reproducible dose distribution. First clinical results are promising.

Organ or sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. The role of contact X-ray brachytherapy in a monocentric series of 112 patients

BACKGROUND

Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) has been used at Centre Antoine Lacassagne since 2002 to increase the chance of conservative treatment (organ or sphincter preservation) in rectal cancer. A consecutive series of 112 patients (pts) is reported.

METHODS

Three protocols were used in selected rectal adenocarcinomas. Group 1: T1 N0 treated with local excision (LE) followed by adjuvant CXB. Group 2: T2 or 'early' T3 N0 treated with CXB combined with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surveillance or LE. Group 3: distal 'locally advanced' T3 N0-2 treated with CXB and CRT before total proctectomy.

RESULTS

Group 1: 27 pt (pTis: 3; pT1: 21; pT2: 3). After LE with CXB alone (20 pt) or CXB + CRT (7 pt) one local recurrence occurred. Organ preservation was achieved in 26 pt (96%). Group 2: 45 pt (T1: 2; T2: 23; T3: 20) treated with CXB alone (4 pt) or CXB + CRT or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (41 pt). A clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 43/45 (96%) and 3 pt developed a local recurrence (11% at 5 years). The specific survival was 76% at 5 years and the rate of organ preservation was 89% (40/45 pt) with good bowel function in 36 pt. Group 3: 40 pt, anterior resection (with sphincter preservation) was possible in 35 pt (86%) with a 3-year local recurrence of 6%.

CONCLUSION

CXB usually combined as a boost with CRT or EBRT may safely increase the chance of a conservative treatment (organ or sphincter preservation) for selected rectal cancers.

Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO)

In rectal cancer management, accurate staging by magnetic resonance imaging, neo-adjuvant treatment with the use of radiotherapy, and total mesorectal excision have resulted in remarkable improvement in the oncological outcomes. However, there is substantial discrepancy in the therapeutic approach and failure to adhere to international guidelines among different Greek-Cypriot hospitals. The present guidelines aim to aid the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer, considering both the local special characteristics of our healthcare system and the international relevant agreements (ESMO, EURECCA). Following background discussion and online communication sessions for feedback among the members of an executive team, a consensus rectal cancer management was obtained. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology voting system on two rounds to achieve further consensus by invited multidisciplinary international experts on colorectal cancer. Statements were considered of high, moderate or low consensus if they were voted by ≥80%, 60-80%, or <60%, respectively; those obtaining a low consensus level after both voting rounds were rejected. One hundred and two statements were developed and voted by 100 experts. The mean rate of abstention per statement was 12.5% (range: 2-45%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a high consensus. Guidelines and algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were proposed. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized.

Surgeon perspectives on the use and effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Despite screening initiatives, rectal cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies diagnosed in patients worldwide with a high mortality. The introduction of neoadjuvant therapy has resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer. Surgeons play an intricate role in the pre-operative, operative, and post-operative management of these patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this comprehensive literature review was to summarize the evolution of the use chemotherapy and radiation and the process of differentiation into specific neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. This will provide a concise summary for practicing surgeons of the current evidence for neoadjuvant chemoradiation as well as the various implications of therapy on operative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The initial benefit of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of rectal cancer patients became evident with prospective studies demonstrating improvements in various oncologic survival outcomes. Due to the improved compliance and reduced toxicity, as well as the potential for tumor down-staging and sphincter preservation, neoadjuvant approaches became the preferred method of administering chemotherapy and radiation. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients has been shown to present with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy. This has resulted in the development of the non-operative "watch and wait" approach, which has initiated discussions on changing the interval from the completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgical resection. The continued development of the multidisciplinary approach will only further improve our ability to provide patients with the best possible oncologic outcomes.

How can we determine the best neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimen for rectal cancer?

SUMMARY 

The current management of patients with clinically defined ‘locally advanced rectal cancer’ often involves fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision. The focus remains primarily on reducing local recurrence, and improving survival, with organ preservation an increasing target. The best neoadjuvant CRT is the most effective regimen, balanced against the tolerability and late functional consequences, which should be selected for the individual according to their individual risk of local and distant recurrence. Hence, what makes the best neoadjuvant treatment depends on the activity and toxicity of the particular schedule, the aims of treatment, the individual disease characteristics and the individual patient pharmacogenomics. Current research efforts focus on enhancing the efficacy of CRT by integrating additional cytotoxics and biologically targeted agents.

Impact of radiotherapy boost on pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after preoperative (chemo)radiation with doses of ⩾60Gy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Complete response is relevant since this could select a proportion of patients for which organ-preserving strategies might be possible. Furthermore, we investigated correlations between EQD2 dose and pCR-rate, toxicity or resectability, and additionally between pCR-rate and chemotherapy, boost-approach or surgical-interval.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries were searched with the terms 'radiotherapy', 'boost' and 'rectal cancer' and synonym terms. Studies delivering a preoperative dose of ⩾60 Gy were eligible for inclusion. Original English full texts that allowed intention-to-treat pCR-rate calculation were included. Study variables, including pCR, acute grade ⩾3 toxicity and resectability-rate, were extracted by two authors independently. Eligibility for meta-analysis was assessed by critical appraisal. Heterogeneity and pooled estimates were calculated for all three outcomes. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the variables mentioned earlier.

RESULTS

The search identified 3377 original articles, of which 18 met our inclusion criteria (1106 patients). Fourteen studies were included for meta-analysis (487 patients treated with ⩾60 Gy). pCR-rate ranged between 0.0% and 44.4%. Toxicity ranged between 1.3% and 43.8% and resectability-rate between 34.0% and 100%. Pooled pCR-rate was 20.4% (95% CI 16.8-24.5%), with low heterogeneity (I2 0.0%, 95% CI 0.00-84.0%). Pooled acute grade ⩾3 toxicity was 10.3% (95% CI 5.4-18.6%) and pooled resectability-rate was 89.5% (95% CI 78.2-95.3%).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation above 60 Gy for locally advanced rectal cancer results in high pCR-rates and acceptable early toxicity. This observation needs to be further investigated within larger randomized controlled phase 3 trials in the future.

Challenges in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: balancing the risk of recurrence and quality of life

The management of patients with rectal cancer has improved substantially-assisted by refinements in surgical technique, the increasing accuracy of preoperative imaging, more precise delivery of radiotherapy¸and more informative feedback from the histopathologist. Multidisciplinary teams have been the key to this success. Future challenges facing multidisciplinary teams include individually tailoring therapy - in particular in deciding who does and does not need radiotherapy, utilising new radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy and new systemic therapies, and electing patients for whom chemoradiotherapy might be potentially curative without surgical resection after complete clinical response. Hence, there is an increasing focus on developing predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers. This paper explores the background to common variations in practice, and the current and future challenges in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Organ-preserving therapy for rectal cancer

SUMMARY Total mesorectal excision has resulted in low local recurrence rates in rectal cancer patients; however, it is associated with a significant impairment in quality of life. The operation may be disfiguring and cause permanent effects on gastrointestinal, genitourinary and sexual function. Recently, researchers have identified subgroups of rectal cancer patients who may be able to forgo total mesorectal excision without compromising their oncological outcomes. Two groups of patients are candidates for organ preservation: those with early-stage disease that may be adequately addressed by a more limited resection, and those with locally advanced disease that has responded completely to neoadjuvant therapy. Additionally, radiation alone may be curative in both early and locally advanced disease. This article reviews the data regarding these approaches.

Towards a "Lyon molecular signature" to individualize the treatment of rectal cancer. Prognostic analysis of a prospective cohort of 94 rectal cancers T1-2-3 Nx MO to be the basis of a molecular signature

PURPOSE

In 1998 a translational research was initiated in Lyon aiming at identifying a prognostic "biomolecular signature" in rectal cancer. This paper presents the clinical outcome of the patients included in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 94 patients were included between 1998 and 2001. A staging with rectoscopy and biopsies was performed before treatment. In case of surgery, the operative specimen was analysed to evaluate the pathological response. There were two types of treatment: neoadjuvant radiotherapy (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) followed by surgery (76 cases) and radiotherapy alone with 'contactherapy' often associated with external beam radiotherapy (18 patients).

RESULTS

The patients had a mean age of 63years. Stage was T1: 4, T2: 24, T3: 65 and T4: 1. The overall survival of the 94 patients was 62% at 8years with a rate of distant metastases of 29%. Rate of local recurrence at 8years was 6% in the neoadjuvant group and 16% in the radiotherapy group with an overall 8years survival in both groups respectively: 64% and 53%. There was a trend towards more metastases in cT3, tumour diameter above 4cm, circumferential extension. There was a significant increase in the risk of metastases for ypT3, ypN1-2 and Dworak score 1-2-3. In multivariate analysis ypT3 was significantly associated with a high rate of metastases (55%; P=0.0003).

CONCLUSION

The rate of distant metastases is a major prognostic factor. These clinical results will serve as the base line to identify a "biomolecular signature" which could complement the TN(M) classification.

Progress in rectal cancer treatment

The dramatic improvement in local control of rectal cancer observed during the last decades is to be attributed to attention to surgical technique and to the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Nevertheless, systemic relapse remains frequent and is currently insufficiently addressed. Intensification of neoadjuvant therapy by incorporating chemotherapy with or without targeted agents before the start of (chemo)radiation or during the waiting period to surgery may present an opportunity to improve overall survival. An increasing number of patients can nowadays undergo sphincter preserving surgery. In selected patients, local excision or even a "wait and see" approach may be feasible following active neoadjuvant therapy. Molecular and genetic biomarkers as well as innovative imaging techniques may in the future allow better selection of patients for this treatment option. Controversy persists concerning the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy after neoadjuvant regimens. The currently available evidence suggests that in complete pathological responders long-term outcome is excellent and adjuvant therapy may be omitted. The results of ongoing trials will help to establish the ideal tailored approach in resectable rectal cancer.

Correlation in rectal cancer between clinical tumor response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and sphincter or organ preservation: 10-year results of the Lyon R 96-02 randomized trial

PURPOSE

To investigate, in rectal cancer, the benefit of a neoadjuvant radiation dose escalation with endocavitary contact radiotherapy (CXRT) in addition to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). This article provides an update of the Lyon R96-02 Phase III trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 88 patients with T2 to T3 carcinoma of the lower rectum were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant EBRT 39 Gy in 13 fractions (43 patients) vs. the same EBRT with CXRT boost, 85 Gy in three fractions (45 patients). Median follow-up was 132 months.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulated rate of permanent colostomy (CRPC) was 63% in the EBRT group vs. 29% in the EBRT+CXRT group (p < 0.001). The 10-year rate of local recurrence was 15% vs. 10% (p = 0.69); 10-year disease-free survival was 54% vs. 53% (p = 0.99); and 10-year overall survival was 56% vs. 55% (p = 0.85). Data of clinical response (CR) were available for 78 patients (36 in the EBRT group and 42 in the EBRT+CXRT group): 12 patients were in complete CR (1 patient vs. 11 patients), 53 patients had a CR ≥ 50% (24 patients vs. 29 patients), and 13 patients had a CR <50% (11 patients vs. 2 patients) (p < 0.001). Of the 65 patients with CR ≥ 50%, 9 had an organ preservation procedure (meaning no rectal resection) taking advantage of major CR. The 10-year CRPC was 17% for patients with complete CR, 42% for patients with CR ≥ 50%, and 77% for patients with CR <50% (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

In cancer of the lower rectum, CXRT increases the complete CR, turning in a significantly higher rate of long-term permanent sphincter and organ preservation.

Toward the non-surgical management of locally advanced rectal cancer

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiation (CRT) reduce local recurrence rates when compared to surgery alone and remain widely accepted as standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, surgery is not without complications and a non-surgical approach in carefully selected patients warrants evaluation. A pathological complete response to CRT is associated with a significant improvement in survival and it has been suggested that a longer time interval between the completion of CRT and surgery increases tumor downstaging. Intensification of neoadjuvant treatment regimens to increase tumor downstaging has been evaluated in a number of clinical trials and more recently the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to CRT has demonstrated high rates of radiological tumor regression. Careful selection of patients using high-resolution MRI may allow a non-surgical approach in a subgroup of patients achieving a complete response to neoadjuvant therapies after an adequate time period. Clearly this needs prospective evaluation within a clinical trial setting, incorporating modern imaging techniques, and tissue biomarkers to allow accurate prediction and assessment of response.

A single-centre experience of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: is there potential for nonoperative management?

AIM

The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients who received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer, specifically those with complete clinical response (CCR) and who were then managed nonoperatively with a 'Watch and Wait' follow-up protocol.

METHOD

A retrospective study was carried out of patients undergoing preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, conducted in a district general hospital managing rectal cancer through the multidisciplinary team process.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients received preoperative CRT over a 5-year period (2004-2009). Twelve (24%) were considered potentially to have had a complete response on MRI. Of these, six subsequently had clinical evidence of residual disease, leading to surgery (mean time to surgery, 24 weeks; range, 12-36 weeks). The remaining six had CCR, avoiding surgery (mean follow up, 26 months; range, 12-45 months), with all six patients disease free to date. A further six patients had complete pathological response (CPR) following surgery after comprehensive histopathological assessment of the specimen.

CONCLUSION

In this consecutive series of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with CRT, 12% demonstrated a CCR and have been actively managed conservatively, thereby avoiding surgery. With further improvements in diagnostic assessment of response to CRT, this figure may rise.

Critical appraisal of the 'wait and see' approach in rectal cancer for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Some 10-20 per cent of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery following preoperative chemoradiation (CRT). Some demonstrate a sustained clinical complete response (cCR), defined as absence of clinically detectable residual tumour after CRT, and do not undergo resection. The aim of this review was to evaluate non-operative treatment of rectal cancer after CRT, and the outcome of patients observed without radical surgery.

METHODS

A systematic computerized search identified 30 publications (9 series, 650 patients) evaluating a non-operative approach after CRT. Original data were extracted and tabulated, and study quality evaluated. The primary outcome measure was cCR. Secondary outcome measures included locoregional failure rate, disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

The most recent Habr-Gama series reported a low locoregional failure rate of 4·6 per cent, with 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates of 96 and 72 per cent respectively. These findings were supported by a small prospective Dutch study. However, other retrospective series have described higher recurrence rates. All studies were heterogeneous in staging, inclusion criteria, study design and rigour of follow-up after CRT, which might explain the different outcomes. The definition of cCR was inconsistent, with only partial concordance with pCR. The results suggested that patients who are observed, but subsequently fail to sustain a cCR, may fare worse than those who undergo immediate tumour resection.

CONCLUSION

The rationale of a 'wait and see' policy relies mainly on retrospective observations from a single series. Proof of principle in small low rectal cancers, where clinical assessment is easy, should not be extrapolated uncritically to more advanced cancers where nodal involvement is common. Long-term prospective observational studies with more uniform inclusion criteria are required to evaluate the risk versus benefit.

Predictive factors of tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to correlate tumor response to survival and to identify predictive factors for tumor response after chemoradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1998 to 2008, 168 patients with histologically proven locally advanced adenocarcinoma treated by preoperative chemoradiation before total mesorectal excision were retrospectively studied. They received a radiation dose of 45 Gy with a concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Analysis of tumor response was based on lowering of the T stage between pretreatment endorectal ultrasound and pathologic specimens. Overall and progression-free survival rates were correlated with tumor response. Tumor response was analyzed with predictive factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 34 months. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were, of 44.4% and 74.5% in the whole population, 83.4% and 83.4%, respectively, in patients with pathological complete response, 38.6% and 71.9%, respectively, in patients with tumor downstaging, and 29.1 and 58.9% respectively, in patients with absence of response. A pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level of <5 ng/ml was significantly independently associated with pathologic complete tumor response (p = 0.019). Pretreatment small tumor size (p = 0.04), pretreatment CEA level of <5 ng/ml (p = 0.008), and chemotherapy with capecitabine (vs. 5-FU) (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with tumor downstaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Downstaging and complete response after CRT improved progression-free survival and overall survival of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. In multivariate analysis, a pretreatment CEA level of <5 ng/ml was associated with complete tumor response. Thus, small tumor size, a pretreatment CEA level of < 5 ng/ml, and use of capecitabine were associated with tumor downstaging.

Increasing the rates of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal cancer: results of a prospective study using additional chemotherapy during the resting period

OBJECTIVES

Addition of chemotherapy in the resting period between radiotherapy completion and response assessment during neoadjuvant treatment for distal rectal cancer could potentially increase rates of complete tumor regression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate toxicity rates and the impact of an extended neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimen on complete response rates.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive patients with nonmetastatic distal rectal cancer were prospectively included. Patients were managed by 5,400 Gy of radiation and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-based chemotherapy given for three consecutive days every 21 days for six cycles (three cycles concomitant with radiotherapy). Tumor response assessment was performed at ten weeks from radiation completion. Patients with complete clinical response were strictly monitored and were not immediately operated on. Patients with incomplete clinical response were referred to surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had completed 12 months of follow-up and were included in this preliminary analysis. Twenty-eight (97%) successfully completed treatment. Fifteen of 16 patients had Grade III toxicities that were skin-related (93%). Median follow-up was 23 months. Fourteen patients (48%) were considered as complete clinical responders sustained for at least 12 months (median, 24 months) after chemoradiation completion by clinical assessment alone. An additional five patients (17%) were considered as complete responders with ypT0 results after full-thickness local excision. Overall, the complete response rate was 65%.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of chemotherapy during the resting period after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with acceptable toxicity and high tolerability rates. The considerably high rates of complete response in this preliminary series requires further follow-up, but they may provide valuable information for future prospective, randomized trials.

Controversies of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in elderly patients

The cornerstone of treatment for rectal cancer is resectional treatment according to the principles of total mesorectal excision (TME). However, population-based registries show that improvements in outcome after resectional treatment occur mainly in younger patients. Furthermore, 6-month postoperative mortality is significantly increased in elderly patients (> or = 75 years of age) compared with younger patients (< 75 years of age). Several confounding factors, such as treatment-related complications and comorbidity, are thought to be responsible for these disappointing findings. Thus, major resectional treatment is not advantageous for all older patients with rectal cancer. However, the Dutch TME trial showed a good response to a short course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in elderly patients. Biological responses to cancer treatment seem to change with age, and, therefore, individualised cancer treatments should be used that take into account the heterogeneity of ageing. For elderly patients who retain a good physical and mental condition, treatment that is given to younger patients is deemed appropriate, whereas for those with diminished physiological reserves and comorbid conditions, alternative treatments that keep surgical trauma to a minimum and optimise the use of radiotherapy might be more suitable.

Contact X-ray therapy for rectal cancer: experience in Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Nice, 2002-2006

PURPOSE

To report the results of using contact X-ray (CXR), which has been used in the Centre-Lacassagne since 2002 for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 44 patients were treated between 2002 and 2006 using four distinct clinical approaches. Patients with Stage T1N0 tumors were treated with transanal local excision (TLE) and adjuvant CXR (45 Gy in three fractions) (n = 7). The 11 inoperable (or who had refused surgery) patients with Stage T2-T3 disease were treated with CXR plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Those with Stage T3N0-N2 tumors were treated with preoperative CXR plus EBRT (with or without concurrent chemotherapy) followed by surgery (n = 21). Finally, the patients with Stage T2 disease were treated with CXR plus EBRT followed by TLE (n = 5).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 25 months. In the 7 patients who underwent TLE first, no local failure was observed, and their anorectal function was good. Of the 11 inoperable patients who underwent CXR plus EBRT alone, 10 achieved local control. In the third group (preoperative CXR plus EBRT), anterior resection was performed in 16 of 21 patients. Complete sterilization of the operative specimen was seen in 4 cases (19%). No local recurrence occurred. Finally, of the 5 patients treated with CXR plus EBRT followed by TLE, a complete or near complete clinical response was observed in all. TLE with a R0 resection margin was performed in all cases. The rectum was preserved with good function in all 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

These early results have confirmed that CXR combined with surgery (or alone with EBRT) can play a major role in the conservative and curative treatment of rectal cancer.

Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: an updated analysis of factors affecting pathological response

AIMS

With the aim of improving locoregional control, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer has increased. A pathological complete response (pCR) is often used as a surrogate marker for the efficacy of different CRT schedules. By analysing factors affecting pCR, this analysis aims to guide the development of future trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches of Medline, EMBASE and the electronic American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases were carried out to identify prospective phase II and phase III trials using preoperative CRT to treat rectal cancer. Trials were eligible for inclusion if they defined: the CRT drugs, the radiation dose and the pCR rate. Phase I patients were excluded from the analysis. A multivariate analysis examined the effect of the above variables on the pCR rate and in addition the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the type of publication (peer reviewed vs abstract), the year of publication and whether the cancers were stated to be inoperable, fixed or threatening the circumferential resection margin were included. The method of analysis used was weighted linear modelling of the pCR rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-four phase II and seven phase III trials were identified including a total of 4732 patients. Statistically significant factors associated with pCR were the use of two drugs, the method of fluoropyrimidine administration (with continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil being the most effective) and a higher radiotherapy dose. Although the use of two drugs was associated with a higher rate of pCR, no single schedule seemed to be more effective. None of the other factors analysed significantly influenced pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher rate of pCR is seen in studies using two drugs, infusional 5-fluorouracil and a radiotherapy dose of 45 Gy and above.

Complete clinical response after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: is a "wait and see" policy justified?

PURPOSE

A proportion of patients, who receive preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced (T3, T4, NX) rectal cancer achieve a complete clinical response and a pathologic complete response in the region of 15 to 30 percent. Support is growing in the United Kingdom for the concept of "waiting to see" and not proceeding to radical surgery when a complete clinical response is observed. The purpose of this review was to use a literature search to assess how often complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the concordance of this finding with pathologic complete response, and to determine whether it is feasible to observe patients who achieve complete clinical response rather than proceed to surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 218 Phase I/II or retrospective studies and 28 Phase III trials of preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiation were identified: 96 percent of trials documented the pathologic complete response, but only 38 trials presented data on the achievement of a complete clinical response/partial clinical response. Only five studies were found in which patients with clinically staged T2/T3 tumors were treated with radiotherapy/chemoradiation and did not routinely proceed to surgery and also reported on the long-term outcome of a "wait and see" policy.

DISCUSSION

It remains uncertain whether the degree of response to chemoradiation in terms of complete clinical response or pathologic complete response is a useful clinical end point. Studies that include T3 rectal cancer are associated with high local recurrence rates after nonsurgical treatment. Few studies report long-term outcome after achievement of a complete clinical response.

CONCLUSIONS

The end point of complete clinical response is inconsistently defined and seems insufficiently robust with only partial concordance with pathologic complete response. The rationale of a "wait and see" policy when complete clinical response status is achieved relies on retrospective observations, which are currently insufficient to support this policy except in patients who are recognized to be unfit for or refuse radical surgery.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Multimodal treatment of rectal cancer

Greater understanding of the natural history of rectal cancer, and the knowledge that a histologically involved circumferential margin due to inadequate lateral dissection confers a high risk of local recurrence have driven technical advances in surgical technique with meticulous surgical dissection along embryological planes. Significant improvements in local control and overall survival have been seen for patients with resectable rectal cancer. However, even high-quality surgery cannot always achieve a curative resection for locally advanced cancers that extend below the levators, having transgressed the mesorectal fascia. Magnetic resonance imaging is now accepted as a practical method of clinical staging, and can accurately predict pre-operatively the likelihood of achieving a clear circumferential margin. Technological advances in radiation planning and new effective cytotoxic drugs also give scope for dealing with unresectable rectal cancer, and the potential for controlling distant micrometastases. Hence, modern multimodal treatment of rectal cancer attempts to integrate surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and address the two distinct problems of local recurrence and metastatic disease. Multidisciplinary teams achieve the best results. This paper discusses the surgical management of rectal cancer, the pathology, the principles of imaging, and the lessons learnt from randomized trials of radiotherapy and chemoradiation.

Long-term outcomes of patients with localized rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone because of medical inoperability or patient refusal

PURPOSE

The standard management of rectal cancer continues to be defined by the results of randomized, clinical trials exploring the optimal timing and use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in relation to surgery. The patient with rectal cancer who is elderly and/or has significant comorbidities and the patient who refuses surgery are clinical contexts for which there is limited current data to guide decision making.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at six Australian centers of patients with rectal cancer treated with radiation therapy or chemoradiation alone because of excessive operative risk or patient refusal of surgery.

RESULTS

We identified 48 patients treated between August 1998 and June 2005 with a median age of 76 (range, 49-94) years. Twenty-four patients (50 percent) were considered medically inoperable and 24 patients refused surgery. Treatment was with chemoradiation (with 5-fluorouracil) in 36 patients and radiotherapy alone in 12 patients; 93 percent completed the planned therapy. A clinical complete response was seen in 56 percent and a partial response in 30 percent of patients. At a median follow-up of 49 months, 18 patients have disease progression, including 10 of 24 in the medically inoperable group and 8 of 24 in the refused surgery group. Of the 25 deceased patients, 16 died from progressive disease and 9 from noncancer causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone is a safe alternative that results in significant progression-free and overall survival times in patients who are considered medically inoperable or refuse to undergo surgery. Ultimately, however, many patients will progress.

External Beam Radiotherapy and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Medically Unfit and Elderly Patients

In the treatment of rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision surgery is now the standard of care. In most patients, surgery will be preceeded by radiotherapy, either in a short course (25 Gy/five fractions) or in a conventional schedule (45-50 Gy/25 fractions) with chemotherapy. For patients unfit for surgery or unwilling to undergo a procedure resulting in a permanent colostomy, radiotherapy without surgery is the alternative. From published studies it is clear that for relatively small tumours, local treatment with either contact X-rays or intraluminal brachytherapy is a reasonable option. For patients with larger tumours, the risk of nodal involvement makes the combination of local radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy necessary. So far, this combination has mainly been given with contact X-rays and only sporadically with intraluminal brachytherapy. In this overview, a summary of published studies will be given, with a proposal for a trial for medically unfit patients with T2-T4 tumours.

Whither Papillon? — Future Directions for Contact Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

Although contact radiotherapy was developed 70 years ago, and is highly effective with cure rates of over 90% for early rectal cancer, there are few centres that offer this treatment today. One reason is the lack of replacement of ageing contact X-ray machines, many of which are now over 30 years old. To address this problem, the International Contact Radiotherapy Evaluation (ICONE) group was formed at a meeting in Liverpool in 2005 with the aim of developing a new contact X-ray unit and to establish clinical protocols that would enable the new machine to safely engage in the treatment of rectal cancer. As a result of these efforts, a European company is starting production of the new Papillon RT-50 machine, which will be available shortly. In addition, the ICONE group is planning an observational study on contact X-ray and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (CONTEM) for curative treatment of rectal cancer. This protocol will ensure standardised diagnostic procedures, patient selection and treatment in centres across the world and the data will be collected prospectively for analysis and audit. It is hoped that the CONTEM trial will provide the scientific evidence that is needed to obtain a broader acceptance of local contact radiotherapy as a treatment option for selected cases with early stage rectal cancer.

Is there a limit to dose escalation for rectal cancer?

The radiation tolerance of the rectum is not fully understood. Published studies on the radiation treatment of cancers of the prostate, cervix and rectum have been reviewed to determine currently recommended dose-volume guidelines. The need for further studies directed specifically at the treatment of primary rectal cancer and perirectal node metastases is discussed. There seems to be room for escalation of the external beam doses currently given.

French experience with contact X-ray endocavitary radiation for early rectal cancer

This paper is an overview of the French experience with contact X-ray radiation for rectal cancer. The analysis was mainly carried out on 50 years of experience in Lyon or since 1980 in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon Sud. The results obtained in Dijon and Nancy are also reported. In early rectal cancer, contact X-ray radiation can play an important role in three different situations: (1) small T1 less than 2 cm: adjuvant contact X-ray radiotherapy after local excision; (2) T2 N0 or large T1: first-line contact X-ray radiotherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) followed by surgery (anterior resection or local excision); (3) early T3 N0 in frail patients: the same approach as for T2 N0 with, in case of clinical complete response, local excision or follow-up.