Changing prostate-specific antigen outcome after surgery or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer during the prostate-specific antigen era

Mortality reduction and cumulative excess incidence (CEI) in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening era

The extent to which PSA screening is related to prostate cancer mortality reduction in the United States (US) is controversial. US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data from 1980 to 2016 were examined to assess the relationship between prostate cancer mortality and cumulative excess incidence (CEI) in the PSA screening era and to clarify the impact of race on this relationship. CEI was considered as a surrogate for the intensity of prostate cancer screening with PSA testing and subsequent biopsy as appropriate. Data from 163,982,733 person-years diagnosed with 544,058 prostate cancers (9 registries, 9% of US population) were examined. Strong inverse linear relationships were noted between CEI and prostate cancer mortality, and 317,356 prostate cancer deaths were avoided. Eight regions of the US demonstrated prostate cancer mortality reduction of 46.0-63.7%. On a per population basis, the lives of more black men than white men were saved in three of four registries with sufficient black populations for comparison. Factor(s) independent of CEI (potential effects of treatment advances) explained 14.6% of the mortality benefit (p-value = 0.3357) while there was a significant main effect of CEI (effect = -0.0064; CI: [-0.0088, -0.0040]; p-value < 0.0001). Therefore, there is a strong relationship between CEI and prostate cancer mortality reduction that was not related to factors independent of screening utilization. Minority populations have experienced large mortality reductions in the context of PSA mass utilization.

Biochemical progression-free survival in localized prostate cancer patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy

Introduction

Prostate cancer is now the third most frequent noncutaneous malignancy in Iranian men and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Measurement of total serum prostate specific antigens (PSAs) has been one of the strongest predictors of biochemical progression and overall survival in determining the efficacy of definitive external beam radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate cancer. The aim of this research was to identify the 5-year biochemical progression-free survival (BFS) and related prognostic and predictive factors of localized prostate cancer patients who were treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy.

Methods

This study analyzed 192 localized prostate cancer patients from stage T1aN0M0 to stage T3N0M0; they were treated with definitive radiation therapy and followed up in the radiation-oncology ward of Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital in Tehran (Iran) between 2006 and 2013. The 5-year BFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. For multivariate analysis, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the strengths of various factors for 5-year BFS.

Results

The follow-up period was between 14–81 months, with a median of 31 months. The median cumulative prostate dose in our series was 64 Gray (Gy) (range 62 to 78 Gy). The 5-year BFS for all patients was 65.1%, and 5-year BFS in low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were 100%, 86.5%, and 54.9% respectively. Multivariate analysis found statistically significant relation between 5-year BFS and initial PSA>20, Gleason score 8–10, high risk group, TNM stage≥T2cN0M0, radiotherapy dose<70 Gy, radiotherapy with 2D technique and hormonal therapy in high-risk group (p=0.003, p=0.032, p=0.014, p=0.001, p=0.035, p=0.035, p=0.022 respectively).

Conclusion

Our seven years’ experience of follow-up with PSA showed that PSA was the strongest predictor of biochemical progression survival in patients with prostate cancer who were treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy.

Outcomes and predictors of localized or locally-advanced prostate cancer treated by radiotherapy in Indonesia

Purpose:

Presently there is no published data on the outcomes of localized or locally-advanced prostate cancer (PCa) treated by external-beam radiotherapy (RT) in Indonesia.

Methods:

This study retrospectively analyzed 96 patients with localized or locally-advanced PCa treated by RT from year 1995 to 2009, at the national referral hospital and the national cancer hospital of Indonesia. Cumulative prostate and pelvic radiation dose/type was <70 Gy conventional RT in 84.4% patients, and ≥70 Gy Three dimensional-conformal or intensity modulated RT in 15.6% patients. Overall survival (OS) and biochemical progression-free survival (BFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Predictors of OS and biochemical recurrence were analyzed by multivariate Cox regressions.

Results:

The median follow-up was 61 months (range, 24 to 169 months). There were 3.1% low-risk, 26% intermediate-risk, and 70.8% high-risk cases. More than half of the patients (52.1%) had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 ng/mL. The 5-year survival outcome of low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients were: OS, 100%, 94.7%, and 67.9% (P=0.297); and BFS, 100%, 94.1%, and 57.1% (P=0.016), respectively. In the high-risk group, the 5-year OS was 88.3% in patients who received adjuvant hormonal androgen deprivation therapy (HT), compared to 53% in RT only, P=0.08. Significant predictors of OS include high-risk group (hazard Ratio [HR], 9.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 57.6; P=0.016), adjuvant therapy (HR, 0.175; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.58; P=0.005), detection by transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) (HR, 6.81; 95% CI, 2.28 to 20.33; P=0.001), and pretreatment PSA (HR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.005; P=0.039). The sole predictor of biochemical failure was pretreatment PSA (P=0.04), with odds ratio of 4.52 (95% CI, 1.61 to 12.65) for PSA >20 ng/mL.

Conclusions:

RT is an effective treatment modality for localized or locally-advanced PCa in Indonesian patients, with outcomes and predictors consistent to that reported elsewhere. Predictors of poorer outcomes include high-risk group, higher pretreatment PSA, incidental detection by TUR-P, and lack of adjuvant HT. Adjuvant hormonal therapy significantly improve the survival of high risk patients.

Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09

PURPOSE To test the hypothesis that increasing radiation dose delivered to men with early-stage prostate cancer improves clinical outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with T1b-T2b prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen </= 15 ng/mL were randomly assigned to a total dose of either 70.2 Gray equivalents (GyE; conventional) or 79.2 GyE (high). No patient received androgen suppression therapy with radiation. Local failure (LF), biochemical failure (BF), and overall survival (OS) were outcomes. Results A total of 393 men were randomly assigned, and median follow-up was 8.9 years. Men receiving high-dose radiation therapy were significantly less likely to have LF, with a hazard ratio of 0.57. The 10-year American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology BF rates were 32.4% for conventional-dose and 16.7% for high-dose radiation therapy (P < .0001). This difference held when only those with low-risk disease (n = 227; 58% of total) were examined: 28.2% for conventional and 7.1% for high dose (P < .0001). There was a strong trend in the same direction for the intermediate-risk patients (n = 144; 37% of total; 42.1% v 30.4%, P = .06). Eleven percent of patients subsequently required androgen deprivation for recurrence after conventional dose compared with 6% after high dose (P = .047). There remains no difference in OS rates between the treatment arms (78.4% v 83.4%; P = .41). Two percent of patients in both arms experienced late grade >/= 3 genitourinary toxicity, and 1% of patients in the high-dose arm experienced late grade >/= 3 GI toxicity. CONCLUSION This randomized controlled trial shows superior long-term cancer control for men with localized prostate cancer receiving high-dose versus conventional-dose radiation. This was achieved without an increase in grade >/= 3 late urinary or rectal morbidity.

Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies

Since its introduction more than a decade ago, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has spread to most radiotherapy departments worldwide for a wide range of indications. The technique has been rapidly implemented, despite an incomplete understanding of its advantages and weaknesses, the challenges of IMRT planning, delivery, and quality assurance, and the substantially increased cost compared with non-IMRT. Many publications discuss the theoretical advantages of IMRT dose distributions. However, the key question is whether the use of IMRT can be exploited to obtain a clinically relevant advantage over non-modulated external-beam radiation techniques. To investigate which level of evidence supports the routine use of IMRT for various disease sites, we did a review of clinical studies that reported on overall survival, disease-specific survival, quality of life, treatment-induced toxicity, or surrogate endpoints. This review shows evidence of reduced toxicity for various tumour sites by use of IMRT. The findings regarding local control and overall survival are generally inconclusive.

Lack of Progress in Early Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The stage of presentation of prostate cancer has changed dramatically in the past two decades, largely because of prostate-specific antigen screening and increased public awareness regarding the disease. Recently, strides have been made in the validation, development, and approval of bladder cancer (BC) markers. We sought to evaluate whether any stage migration has occurred for patients with BC during the same period.

METHODS

A total of 351 and 1262 patients underwent radical cystectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy, respectively, between 1992 and 2005 by one surgeon. The patients were divided into two consecutive groups: group 1 (1992 to 1998) and group 2 (1999 to 2005). The baseline and pathologic characteristics of the patients were compared.

RESULTS

No differences were found in the clinical or pathologic staging between the two groups of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival also was not different between the two groups. For patients with prostate cancer, those in group 2 presented at a younger age, with a lower prostate-specific antigen level, and had a lower clinical stage. Group 2 patients had a decrease in the incidence of extracapsular extension, a decreased tumor volume, and a decrease in the incidence of Gleason 8 to 10 tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

During two consecutive periods, our patients with prostate cancer presented with the cancer at an earlier stage and had more favorable pathologic features after radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, our patients with BC did not demonstrate any stage migration. Physicians need to be more aggressive in diagnosing BC, especially in patients at high risk of the disease. Risk factors must be emphasized, urine markers should be used in a screening strategy, and the indications for radical cystectomy should be liberalized.

Identifying men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer who are at high risk for death from prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We identified factors at diagnosis that are significantly associated with time to prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort included 1,453 men treated with radical prostatectomy (1,095) or external beam radiation therapy (358) for localized prostate cancer between 1989 and 2002. Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to evaluate whether prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen velocity, biopsy Gleason score and clinical tumor category at diagnosis were significantly associated with time to prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy.

RESULTS

In addition to increasing prostate specific antigen (p < or =0.04) and biopsy Gleason score 8 to 10 disease (p < or =0.02), prostate specific antigen velocity more than 2 ng/ml yearly was significantly associated with shorter time to prostate cancer specific mortality in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (adjusted HR 12, 95% CI 3 to 54) and external beam radiation therapy (adjusted HR 12, 95% CI 3 to 54) compared with that in men with prostate specific antigen velocity 2 ng/ml yearly or less (p < or =0.001). Despite low risk disease 7-year estimates of prostate cancer specific mortality were 5% to 19% in patients in whom prostate specific antigen increased by more than 2 ng/ml during the year before diagnosis compared with less than 1% in those with a prostate specific antigen increase of 2 ng/ml or less.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite prostate specific antigen level less than 10 ng/ml and Gleason score 6 cancer a prostate specific antigen increase of more than 2 ng/ml during the year before diagnosis places a man at high risk for prostate cancer death following radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy.

Radiation dose escalation combined with hormone therapy improves outcome in localised prostate cancer

We present the impact of systematic radiation dose escalation from 64 Gy to 66 Gy to 70 Gy on the outcome after radiation therapy (RT) alone or combined with hormonal treatment (HT) in a series of 494 consecutive localised prostate cancer patients treated during 1990-1999. Prognostic factors for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure, overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer specific survival (CSS) were investigated using multivariate analysis. T stage, pre-treatment PSA, grade, radiation dose and HT were found to be independent predictors of PSA failure. T stage, grade and HT were also independent predictors of both OS and CSS, while radiation dose was a significant predictor for OS and indicated a trend (p = 0.07) for CSS. A dose of 70 Gy combined with hormonal treatment improves PSA failure free survival and survival in localised prostate cancer compared with doses of 64-66 Gy.

Radiothérapie conformationnelle du cancer de la prostate : technique et résultats

A number of retrospective and prospective studies have demonstrated that radiotherapy of prostate cancer must be actually conformal. Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning consists in an as accurate as possible definition of target-volume, usually by CT-scan, and design of radiation fields shaped to this target-volume. Several steps are required, each step being important for the overall quality of the treatment. Conformal radiotherapy is better tolerated than conventional irradiation, with significantly less rectal toxicity. It allows dose-escalation up to 80 Gy. It is now possible to go beyond this dose with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The benefit of these high doses was demonstrated by some large retrospective studies and some prospective dose-escalation trials. Several randomized trials are in progress, preliminary results of two of them have been published, both showing an improvement in disease control with the higher doses. The advantage of higher doses is clearly evident for patients in the intermediate prognostic group, but is still discussed for patients with a low risk tumour or treated in combination with hormone therapy. Late proctitis is the main toxicity of these high doses. Some volume constraints have been defined during the last years and will allow a decrease of the rate of rectal toxicity. Because of these technological improvements, results of radiation therapy are now similar to those of surgery: no direct comparison with a randomized trial is available, but large comparative studies show that long-term disease control are identical with both techniques. Radiation therapy must be proposed to all patients with a prostate carcinoma as an alternative to surgery.

Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon

BACKGROUND

Information on tumor stage and grade are used to assess cancer prognosis and to produce standardized comparisons of end results over time. Changes in the interpretation of classification schemes can alter the apparent distribution of cancer stage or grade in the absence of a true biologic change. Since the introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing, the reported incidence of low-grade prostate cancer has declined. To determine whether this decline is in part a result of Gleason score reclassification during the same time period, we documented the potential impact of reclassification between 1992 and 2002 on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of 1858 men who were < or = 75 years of age at diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1990-1992 was assembled retrospectively from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Histology slides of the diagnostic prostate tissue were retrieved and reread in 2002-2004 by an experienced pathologist blinded to the original Gleason score readings. Prostate cancer mortality rates for the cohort calculated using the original Gleason score readings were compared with those calculated using the contemporary Gleason score readings. Statistical tests were two sided.

RESULTS

The contemporary Gleason score readings were statistically significantly higher than the original readings (mean score increased from 5.95 to 6.8; difference = 0.85, 95% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.91; P < .001). Consequently, the Gleason score-standardized contemporary prostate cancer mortality rate (1.50 deaths per 100 person-years) appeared to be 28% lower than standardized historical rates (2.08 deaths per 100 person-years), even though the overall outcome was unchanged. This apparent improvement in mortality held for all Gleason score categories.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, a decline in the reported incidence of low-grade prostate cancers appears to be the result of Gleason score reclassification over the past decade. This reclassification resulted in apparent improvement in clinical outcomes. This finding reflects a statistical artifact known as the Will Rogers phenomenon.

Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects

Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3-6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58-81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45-70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74 Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53-77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50-74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50-1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent > or =Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG> or =2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade > or =3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade> or =1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis.

Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part II

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a novel conformal radiotherapy technique which is gaining increasingly widespread use. This second clinical article aims to summarize the published data pertaining to prostate cancer, pelvic irradiation, gynaecological and breast cancer. Prostate cancer patients represent the largest group treated to date. The main indication has been radiation dose escalation within acceptable normal tissue late toxicity. Phase II data are promising, but no randomized clinical trial data are available to support its use. Pelvic IMRT aims to deliver radical radiation doses to pelvic lymph nodes while sparing the bowel and bladder. Indications for breast IMRT data are reviewed, and current data presented. Further data from randomized trials are required to confirm the anticipated benefits of IMRT in patients.

10-Year Outcome for Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With External Radiation Therapy:: Results of a Cohort Study

PURPOSE

We determine the efficacy of conventional dose, external beam radiation for localized prostate cancer using cohort analysis with maximized followup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 205 men with T1-2 prostate cancer were treated with conventional external beam radiation to a median and modal dose of 68.4 Gy during a 16-month period from 1991 to 1993. Followup was maximized in these patients, and median followup for those alive with or without disease was 114 months.

RESULTS

Median patient age at treatment was 72 years, and overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 78% and 53%, respectively. The actuarial risk of local failure was 18% at 10 years as was the risk of metastatic disease. The actuarial risk of being free of biochemical failure at 10 years (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition) was 49%. That risk was 42% if the definition was used without backdating failure to a time between last low value and first increase. When a crude analysis of 10-year outcome was performed 127 of the 205 treated patients (62%) were still alive, including 59% with no evidence of biochemical failure and a median prostate specific antigen of 1.0 ng/ml. Of the 78 men (38% of total) who died during the 10 years 32 died either of or with recurrent cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Mature followup minimizes many of the biases seen in previously published radiation series. This study provides a yardstick against which newer radiation modalities may be measured.

Salvage prostatectomy in patients who have failed radiation therapy or cryotherapy as primary treatment for prostate cancer

Asymptomatic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma poses a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma for clinicians. Patients with locally recurrent disease can consider treatment options of salvage surgery, cryotherapy, watchful waiting, or androgen deprivation. Of these options, only salvage surgery has been shown to result in long-term disease-free survival for selected patients. However, salvage surgery is associated with significant morbidity, including urinary incontinence and rectal injuries. Ideally, salvage surgery outcomes can be optimized with careful patient selection according to clinical stage, serum PSA levels before radiation and surgery, the medical condition of the patient, and clear expectations of the physician and patient. Among patients with locally recurrent disease, those with localized prostate carcinoma amenable to radical prostatectomy before radiation or cryotherapy would be the most suitable candidates for salvage surgery.

Long-term multi-institutional analysis of stage T1–T2 prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy in the PSA era

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcome for patients with Stage T1-T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate definitively irradiated in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine institutions combined data on 4839 patients with Stage T1b, T1c, and T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had a pretreatment PSA level and had received >or=60 Gy as definitive external beam radiotherapy. No patient had hormonal therapy before treatment failure. The median follow-up was 6.3 years. The end point for outcome analysis was PSA disease-free survival at 5 and 8 years after therapy using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) failure definition.

RESULTS

The PSA disease-free survival rate for the entire group of patients was 59% at 5 years and 53% at 8 years after treatment. For patients who had received >or=70 Gy, these percentages were 61% and 55%. Of the 4839 patients, 1582 had failure by the PSA criteria, 416 had local failure, and 329 had distant failure. The greatest risk of failure was at 1.5-3.5 years after treatment. The failure rate was 3.5-4.5% annually after 5 years, except in patients with Gleason score 8-10 tumors for whom it was 6%. In multivariate analysis for biochemical failure, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, radiation dose, tumor stage, and treatment year were all significant prognostic factors. The length of follow-up and the effect of backdating as required by the ASTRO failure definition also significantly affected the outcome results. Dose effects were most significant in the intermediate-risk group and to a lesser degree in the high-risk group. No dose effect was seen at 70 or 72 Gy in the low-risk group.

CONCLUSION

As follow-up lengthens and outcome data accumulate in the PSA era, we continue to evaluate the efficacy and durability of radiotherapy as definitive therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Similar studies with higher doses and more contemporary techniques will be necessary to explore more fully the potential of this therapeutic modality.

The Gleason score shift: score four and seven years ago

PURPOSE

There is some evidence that Gleason scores (GS) have shifted over time, although documentation of the extent to which this has occurred and its clinical significance is sparse.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three types of analyses were performed to characterize the GS shift. First, the time-related changes in GS, T-stage category, and PSA for all 983 patients treated with conformal radiotherapy at our institution were examined between 1992 and 1997. Then a matched-pair analysis of patients treated without androgen deprivation was implemented. Patients were matched for grouped GS, grouped PSA, T category, and grouped radiation dose; 242 patients (Cohort 1) treated between 1992 and 1994 were compared to 242 patients treated between 1995 and 1997 (Cohort 2). Follow-up for each patient in Cohort 1 was truncated to match the length of follow-up for his counterpart in Cohort 2 (median follow-up 42 vs. 47 months). The ASTRO consensus definition of a rising PSA was used. Finally, the pathology slides of 106 patients treated with radiotherapy at another institution between 1987 and 1993 underwent a blind second review by one of the study pathologists (P.T.) in 1998.

RESULTS

The percentages of prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy at our institution from 1992 to 1994 vs. 1995 to 1997 were GS 2-5: 49% vs. 16%, GS 6: 27% vs. 59%, GS 7: 20% vs. 19%, and GS > or =8: 8.3% vs. 6%. There was no clear difference in T category over time with 92-96% having T1-T2 disease. The percentage of patients with a PSA < or = 10 ng/mL rose rapidly from 35% in 1992 to 63% in 1994. In corroboration of these findings, the pathologic review of specimens from 106 patients at another institution yielded changes between the initial reading to the recent reading of 50% to 6% for GS 2-5, 22% to 31% for GS 6, 16% to 25% for GS 7, and 12% to 25% for GS 8-10 (p < 0.0001). From the matched-pair analysis, 5-year Kaplan-Meier bNED rates were 68% and 82% (p = 0.03) favoring Cohort 2.

CONCLUSIONS

During the study period, pretreatment PSA values declined and T category remained stable; yet, GS increased. Upgrading of GS would be expected to lead to an improvement in outcome for all GS groups because of the Will Rogers effect, which explains in part the results of the matched-pair analysis. The GS shift confounds retrospective series spanning the 1990s.

Radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer

External beam radiotherapy is one of the curative treatment options for localised prostate cancer. This article will describe recent advances in prostate radiotherapy, focussing on the results of randomised trials which have addressed the role of radiation dose escalation and of adjuvant hormone therapy. Current controversies will then be considered, including the merits of radiotherapy in comparison with alternative approaches to early prostate cancer, and the possible role of adjuvant radiation following surgery. Finally, future developments will be described, including hypofractionation and dose individualisation, which have the potential to further improve the outcome of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Surgery, brachytherapy, and external-beam radiotherapy for early prostate cancer

Patients diagnosed with early prostate cancer after 2000 can expect better outcomes from treatment than patients who were diagnosed in the 1980s and early 1990s. These improved outcomes are the result of stage migration, new technologies such as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated external-beam radiotherapy (IMRT), better implant techniques, and optimum use of hormone therapy. We review the outcomes for radical prostatectomy, permanent seed implant, 3DCRT, and IMRT. For patients with clinical stage T1c or T2 disease and a Gleason score of less than 8, 5-year biochemical disease-free survival is remarkably similar for all the above treatments. Furthermore, complication rates are acceptable for all these modalities. For patients with bulky T2-3 disease or a Gleason score of 8-10, hormone therapy plus 3DCRT or IMRT is an excellent treatment choice. Studies of radical prostatectomy show the most reliable long-term results, and the studies of external-beam radiotherapy have used the best scientific methods to assess efficacy. On the basis of current data, we recommend specific treatment options.