Age as a predictor of outcome for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS

Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.

Clinical risk score to predict likelihood of recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery

PURPOSE

A majority of women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) receive breast-conserving surgery (BCS) but then face a risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) which can be either recurrence of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. We developed a score to provide individualized information about IBTR risk to guide treatment decisions.

METHODS

Data from 2762 patients treated with BCS for DCIS at centers within the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) were used to identify statistically significant non-treatment-related predictors for 5-year IBTR. Factors most associated with IBTR were estrogen-receptor status of the DCIS, presence of comedo necrosis, and patient age at diagnosis. These three parameters were used to create a point-based risk score. Discrimination of this score was assessed in a separate DCIS population of 301 women (100 with IBTR and 200 without) from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC).

RESULTS

Using NCCN data, the 5-year likelihood of IBTR without adjuvant therapy was 9% (95% CI 5-12%), 23% (95% CI 13-32%), and 51% (95% CI 26-75%) in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively. Addition of the risk score to a model including only treatment improved the C-statistic from 0.69 to 0.74 (improvement of 0.05). Cross-validation of the score resulted in a C-statistic of 0.76. The score had a c-statistic of 0.67 using the KPNC data, revealing that it discriminated well.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple, no-cost risk score may be used by patients and physicians to facilitate preference-based decision-making about DCIS management informed by a more accurate understanding of risks.

The association of young age with local recurrence in women with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the relationship between young age and local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy. Eligible studies were retrieved from various electronic databases. Among the 19 studies included, 14 studies were analyzed for 5-year local recurrence rate and 8 studies for 10-year local recurrence rate using random effects models. Both results showed that young patients were at higher risk of local recurrence compared to old patients (5-year: RR = 2.64, 95% CI (1.94–3.60); 10-year: RR = 2.37, 95% CI (1.57–3.58)). Harbord’s modified test showed the presence of publication bias in both 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates (P = 0.019 and P = 0.01, respectively). While the Trim and Fill analysis showed that the presence of publication bias did not affect the overall outcome of the 5-year local recurrence rate (RR = 2.21, 95% CI (1.62, 3.02)), it significantly affected the effect size of the 10-year local recurrence rate (RR = 1.47, 95% CI (0.96, 2.27)). Young age is a significant risk factor for local recurrence developed within 5 years of breast-conserving therapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Further high-quality studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between young age and the risk of local recurrence developed within 10 years.

Conservative treatment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: results of an Italian multi-institutional retrospective study

Background

The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased markedly in recent decades. In the past, mastectomy was the primary treatment for patients with DCIS, but as with invasive cancer, breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the standard approach. We present the final results of a multi-institutional retrospective study of an Italian Radiation Oncology Group for the study of conservative treatment of DCIS, characterized by a very long period of accrual, from February 1985 to March 2000, and a median follow-up longer than 11 years.

Methods

A collaborative multi-institutional study was conducted in Italy in 10 Radiation Oncology Departments. A consecutive series of 586 women with DCIS histologically confirmed, treated between February 1985 and March 2000, was retrospectively evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range: 29–84); 32 patients were 40 years old or younger. All women underwent conservative surgery followed by whole breast RT. Irradiation was delivered to the entire breast, for a median total dose of 50 Gy; the tumour bed was boosted in 295 cases (50%) at a median dose of 10 Gy.

Results

After a median follow-up of 136 months (range: 16–292 months), 59/586 patients (10%) experienced a local recurrence: invasive in 37 cases, intraductal in 20 and not specified in two. Salvage mastectomy was the treatment of choice in 46 recurrent patients; conservative surgery in 10 and it was unknown in three patients. The incidence of local recurrence was significantly higher in women younger than 40 years (31.3%) (p= 0.0009). Five patients developed distant metastases. Furthermore 40 patients developed a contralateral breast cancer and 31 a second primary tumour in a different site. The 10-year actuarial overall survival (OS) was 95.5% and the 10-year actuarial disease-specific survival (DSS) was 99%.

Conclusions

Our results are consistent with those reported in the literature. In particular it has been defined the importance of young age (40 years or less) as a relevant risk factor for local recurrence. This retrospective multi-institutional Italian study confirms the long term efficacy of breast conserving surgery with RT in women with DCIS.

Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery: multivariable analysis of risk factors and the impact of young age

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence (LR) after breast conservation surgery (BCS) varies with risk factors. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of young age on LR.

METHODS

All patients (excluding those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy) who underwent BCS from 1988-2001 at our institution were identified and evaluated for risk factors of LR.

RESULTS

A total of 3,064 patients underwent 3,131 BCS. Mean age at surgery was 61 (range, 21-98) years: 175 (5.6%) patients were aged<40 years; 492 (15.7%) were 40-49 years; 761 (24.3%) were 50-59 years; 801 (25.6%) were 60-69 years; and 902 (28.8%) were age 70+years. A total of 212 patients (6.8%) developed LR at a mean of 4.5 (range, 0.1-14.4) years after BCS. Mean follow-up was 8.9 (range, 0-20.2) years. The 5-year LR-free survival rate was 94.9%. The frequencies of LR by age group were: <40 years--11.4%; 40-49 years--5.7%; 50-59 years--6.2%; 60-69 years--7.6%; 70 years and older--6.2%. The 5-year LR-free survival rates for these age groups were 90.5%, 95.4%, 95.5%, 95.4%, and 94.7%, respectively (P=0.09, log-rank test). On univariable analysis, patients aged<40 years were nearly twice as likely to experience LR (hazards ratio (HR), 1.81; P=0.012). Multivariable analysis of patients with complete data (n=2,122) demonstrated that age<40 years and node positivity were associated with increased risk of LR, whereas ER positivity and radiation therapy were associated with decreased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for LR after BCS include age<40 years, node positivity, ER negativity, and absence of adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients younger than age 40 years are at increased risk of LR after BCS.

Association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ

We synthesized the evidence of the association between patient and tumor characteristics with clinical outcomes in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. We identified five randomized controlled clinical trials and 64 observational studies that were published in English from January 1970 to January 2009. Younger women with clinically presented ductal carcinoma in situ had higher risk of ipsilateral recurrent cancer. African Americans had higher mortality and greater rates of advanced recurrent cancer. Women with larger tumor size, comedo necrosis, worse pathological grading, positive surgical margins, and at a higher risk category, using a composite prognostic index, had worse outcomes. Inconsistent evidence suggested that positive HER2 receptor and negative estrogen receptor status were associated with worse outcomes. Synthesis of evidence was hampered by low statistical power to detect significant differences in predictor categories and inconsistent adjustment practices across the studies. Future research should address composite prediction indices among race groups for all outcomes.

Local control of ductal carcinoma in situ based on tumor and patient characteristics: the surgeon's perspective

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a disease whose manifestations are largely confined to in-breast pathology. Management strategies therefore focus on various combinations of local therapy: mastectomy, lumpectomy alone, and lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation. Although DCIS does not carry an inherent risk of distant organ metastasis, optimal local control is essential because any in-breast or chest wall recurrence may occur as an invasive lesion. Local recurrence has been reported following breast-conserving surgery as well as mastectomy. Breast radiation is therefore generally recommended following breast-conserving surgery, and in selected circumstances, mastectomy may be the preferred treatment strategy. This article reviews the surgical and associated clinicopathologic issues related to initial biopsy and perioperative planning that should be considered for all DCIS cases to optimize local control.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in younger women: a subgroup of patients at high risk

BACKGROUND

After breast conservative treatment (BCT), young age is a predictive factor for recurrence in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for recurrence and outcomes in these younger women (under 40 years) treated for pure DCIS.

METHODS

From 1974 to 2003, 207 cases were collected in 12 French Cancer Centers. Median age was 36.3 years and median follow-up 160 months. Seventy four (35.8%) underwent mastectomy, 67 (32.4%) lumpectomy alone and 66 (31.9%) lumpectomy plus radiotherapy.

RESULTS

37 recurrences occurred (17.8%): 14 (38%) were in situ and 23 (62%) invasive. After BCT, the overall rate of recurrence was 27% (33% in the lumpectomy plus radiotherapy group vs. 21% in the lumpectomy alone group). Comedocarcinoma subtype (p = 0.004), histological size more than 10 mm (p = 0.011), necrosis (p = 0.022) and positive margin status (p = 0.019) were statistically significant predictive factors for recurrence. The actuarial 15-year rates of local recurrence were 29%, 42% and 37% in the lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy and whole breast radiotherapy and lumpectomy + whole breast radiotherapy with additional boost groups respectively. After recurrence, the 10-year overall survival rate was 67.2%.

CONCLUSION

High recurrence rates (mainly invasive) after BCT in young women with DCIS are confirmed. BCT in this subgroup of patients is possible if clear and large margins are obtained, tumor size is under 11 mm and necrosis- and/or comedocarcinoma-free.

Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation

BACKGROUND

We report local recurrence (LR) after breast-conserving surgery and radiation (BCS + RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to determine outcomes for patients aged <or=40 years compared with older women.

METHODS

The study included 440 women with DCIS treated from 1978 to 2007. All patients received whole-breast radiotherapy with a boost in 95% of cases. Demographics, characteristics, surgical, and adjuvant treatments were analyzed for an effect on LR.

RESULTS

Median age was 56.5 years with 24 patients aged <or=40. Median DCIS size was 0.8 cm. Re-excision was required in 62% of patients, and in 75% of those aged <or=40. Tamoxifen was used in 22%, but only one patient aged <or=40. Median follow-up was 6.8 years. Actuarial LR was 7% (95% confidence interval of 4-11%) at 10 years and 8% (5-14%) at 15 years. There was no difference in LR by age (P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term risk of LR after BCS + RT for DCIS is low, even in patients <or=40 years. This may be due to patient selection for small size, high utilization of re-excision, and radiation boost. Young age may be a smaller contributor to LR risk in DCIS than previously suggested.

Local Recurrences After Different Treatment Strategies for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Population-Based Study in the East Netherlands

PURPOSE

Outcomes after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast were analyzed for a geographically defined population in the East Netherlands.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 798 patients with a first diagnosis of DCIS between January 1989 and December 2003 were included and their medical records were reviewed. Survival rates for ipsilateral recurrences were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the prognostic significance of different variables.

RESULTS

The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 75% for breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone (237 patients) compared with 91% for BCS followed by radiation therapy (RT; 153 patients) and 99% for mastectomy (408 patients, p < 0.01). Independent risk factors for local recurrences were treatment strategy, symptomatically detected DCIS, and presence of comedo necrosis. Margin status reached statistical significance only for patients treated by BCS (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.0) whereas significance of other prognostic variables did not change.

CONCLUSIONS

In a defined population outside a trial setting, RT after BCS for DCIS lowered recurrence rates. Besides the use of RT, a microscopically complete excision of DCIS is essential. This is especially true for patients with symptomatically detected DCIS and with tumors that contain comedo necrosis, as these groups are at particular high risk for recurrent disease.

259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up

BACKGROUND

The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) is a simple score for predicting the risk of local recurrence (LR) in patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) conservatively treated. This score combines three independent predictors of Local Recurrence. The VNPI has recently been updated with the addition of age as a fourth parameter into the scoring system (University of Southern California/ VNPI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our database consisted of 408 women with DCIS. Applying the USC/VNPI we reviewed retrospectively 259 patients who were treated with breast conserving surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). Of these patients 63.5% had a low VNPI score, 32% intermediate and 4.5% a high score. In the low score group, the majority of the patients underwent Conservative Surgery (CS) without RT while in the intermediate group, almost half of the patients received RT. Eighty-three percent (83%) of the patients with high VNPI were treated with Conservative Surgery plus RT. Nodal assessment by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy was obtained in 32 patients since 2002.

RESULTS

Twenty-one Local Recurrences were observed (8%) with a mean follow up of 130 months: sixteen were invasive. No statistically significant differences in Disease Free Survival were reached in all groups of VNPI score between patients treated with Conservative Surgery or Conservative Surgery plus RT. However it was noted that the higher the VNPI score, the lower was the risk of local recurrence in the group treated additionally with RT, even though it was not statistically significant. Further analysis included those patients treated with Conservative Surgery alone and followed up. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 10 years was 94% with low VNPI and 83% in both intermediate and high score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the subgroups of VNPI. The Local Relapse rate after Conservative Surgery alone, increased with tumor size, margin width, and pathology classification (P < 0,05), while age was not found to be a significant factor. Lesions with only mammographic appearances are associated with lower DFS but it did not reach significance (P = ns), while assumption of estrogenic hormones and familial history of breast cancer are significant factors associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. After multivariate analysis including seven clinical and pathological factors, the only significant predictors of local recurrence remained margin width of surgical excision, previous therapy with estrogens (contraceptives or Hormone Replacement Therapy) and the Van Nuys pathologic classification. The overall survival breast cancer specific was 99% and no differences were observed between groups (P = ns). The comparison of patients treated with a total mastectomy and those conservatively treated showed a significantly better local relapse free survival rate obtained with mastectomy (98.2% vs. 89.7% at 10 years P = 0.02). However, the overall cause-specific survival did not prove any better outcome (98.7% in both groups). Of the 32 patients who underwent a Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, four were found to have micrometastases and all of them had a previous Directional Vacuum Assisted Biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although in our series there is not a significant difference in LR rates by the parameter of age, the new USC/VNPI is still a simple and reliable scoring system for therapeutic management of DCIS. We did not find any statistically significant advantage in groups treated with the addition of RT. Obtaining wide surgical margins appears to be the strongest prognostic factor for local recurrence, regardless of other pathological factors or the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy. However, only prospective randomized studies can precisely predict the risk of LR of conservatively treated DCIS. The clinical significance of Sentinel Lymph Nodes micrometastases Immuno-Histo-Chemistry-detected found in DCIS patients remains uncertain. However, we hypothesize that the anatomical disruption after preoperative biopsy procedures increases the likelihood of epithelial cell displacement and the frequency of IHC-positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes, both of which are directly proportional to the degree of manipulation.

Multifocal breast cancer in women ≤35 years old

BACKGROUND

The relation that multifocality at diagnosis had to survival in women < 35 years of age was evaluated.

METHODS

Three hundred women seen at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1990 and 2002 were identified. Multifocality was defined as the presence of 2 or more foci of the same tumor clearly separated in the same breast. Patient characteristics and outcomes were tabulated and compared between uni- and multifocality. Survival outcomes were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit method and compared between groups with the log-rank statistic. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the association between multifocality and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age was 32 years (range, 17-35). There were 58 patients (19%) with multifocal disease. At a median follow-up of 43.9 months there have been 101 deaths and 138 recurrences. Five-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 69.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.1%, 77.1%) for patients with unifocal disease and 67.3% (95% CI, 54.6%, 83.0%) for patients with multifocal disease (P = .70). Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 44.4% (95% CI, 37.1%, 53.2%) for patients with unifocal disease and 57.1% (5% CI, 43.3%, 75.4%) for patients with multifocal disease, (P = .36). Nuclear grade was found to be an independent predictor of OS and RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.92, 95% CI, 1.24-6.87; HR, 2.09, 95% CI, 1.13-3.83, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Multifocality does not appear to influence prognosis in patients < 35 years of age. Nuclear grade continues to be an important prognostic factor for breast cancer in this age group.

Effectiveness of Radiation Therapy in Older Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

BACKGROUND

For women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), radiation therapy after conservative surgery lowers the risk of recurrence. However, emerging evidence suggests that radiation therapy confers only a marginal absolute benefit for older women with DCIS. In a cohort of older women with DCIS, we sought to determine whether radiation therapy was associated with a clinically significant benefit.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 1999, we identified 3409 women aged 66 years or older treated with conservative surgery for DCIS. A proportional hazards model tested whether radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk of a combined outcome, defined as a subsequent ipsilateral in situ or invasive breast cancer reported by SEER and/or a subsequent mastectomy reported by Medicare claims. The 5-year event risk was determined for patients without and with high-risk features, which were defined as at least one of the following: age 66-69 years, tumor larger than 2.5 cm, comedo histology, and/or high grade. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Radiation therapy was associated with a lower risk for each component of the combined outcome (hazard ratio = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.44). For high-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 13.6% without radiation therapy versus 3.8% with radiation therapy (difference = 9.8%, 95% CI = 6.5 to 13.2; P<.001). For low-risk patients, the 5-year event risk was 8.2% without radiation therapy versus 1.0% with radiation therapy (difference = 7.2%, 95% CI = 3.6 to 10.9; P<.001). Among healthy women aged 66-79 years, the number needed to treat with radiation therapy to prevent one event in 5 years was 11 for high-risk patients and 15-16 for low-risk patients.

CONCLUSION

For older women with DCIS, radiation therapy appears to confer a substantial benefit that remains meaningful even among low-risk patients.

Long-Term Outcome for Mammographically Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Managed with Breast Conservation Treatment

BACKGROUND

The importance of negative final resection margins for optimal local control has been established for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) undergoing breast conservation treatment. This study evaluated long-term outcome after breast conservation treatment and whether reexcision or the presence of residual tumor in the reexcision specimen predicted for local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with negative margins.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 192 women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast conservation treatment at the University of Pennsylvania from 1978 to 2000. Analysis was performed for unilateral, mammographically detected, intraductal breast carcinomas. Study endpoints of interest included rates of local recurrence, overall survival, and cause-specific survival. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 0.1-21.4 years).

RESULTS

The 10-year overall survival and 10-year cause-specific survival rates were 87% and 99%, respectively. There were 11 local failures (6%) in the treated breast, with a 10-year actuarial local failure rate of 10% and a median time to local failure of 7.4 years (mean, 6.6 years; range, 1.6-10.2 years). Among the subset of 124 patients with negative final resection margins, there was no statistically significant difference in the 8-year actuarial local recurrence rates among patients who underwent single excision (7%), reexcision with residual tumor (8%), or reexcision with no residual tumor (0%).

DISCUSSION

The use of breast conservation treatment in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ remains an effective and durable treatment approach. The need for reexcision to achieve negative margins and the presence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ in the reexcision specimen do not negatively impact local recurrence rates in the current study. These findings suggest that requiring more than one surgery to obtain clear resection margins is not an adverse prognostic factor for local failure.

Impact of concurrent proliferative high-risk lesions on the risk of ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma development in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine the risk of ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence (IBCR) and contralateral breast carcinoma (CBC) development in patients with a concurrent diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS).

METHODS

Records of all 307 patients with DCIS treated with breast-conserving treatment (BCT) from 1968 to 1998 were analyzed. Initial pathology reports and all slides available were re-reviewed for evidence of ADH, ALH, or LCIS. Actuarial local recurrence rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty-five cases of DCIS were associated with ADH, 11 with ALH or LCIS, and 14 with both ADH and ALH or LCIS. Overall, IBCR occurred in 14% and no significant difference in the IBCR rate was identified for patients with proliferative lesions compared with patients without these lesions (P = 0.38). Development of CBC in patients with concurrent DCIS and ADH was 4.4 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-13.63) that in patients with DCIS alone (P < 0.01). The 15-year cumulative rate of CBC development was 22.7% in patients with ALH or LCIS compared with 6.5% in patients without these lesions (P = 0.30) and 19% in patients with ADH compared with 4.1% in patients with DCIS alone (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The risk of CBC development is higher with concurrent ADH than in patients with DCIS alone, and these patients may therefore be appropriate candidates for additional chemoprevention strategies. Concurrent ADH, ALH, or LCIS with DCIS is not a contraindication to BCT.

Clinical experience of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is a practical alternative to mastectomy for treating ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We reviewed our experience for treating patients with DCIS of the breast to evaluate the outcome after performing breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCS-RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1983 and December 2002, 25 patients with clinically or mammographically detected DCIS were treated by BCS-RT. One patient was diagnosed with bilateral DCIS. Thirteen cases (50%) had symptomatic lesions at presentation. All 26 cases of 25 patients underwent BCS such as lumpectomy, partial mastectomy or quadrantectomy. All of them received whole breast irradiation to a median dose of 50.4 Gy. Twenty-four cases (92.3%) received a boost to the tumor bed for a median total dose of 59.4 Gy. The median follow up period was 67 months (range: 38 to 149 months).

RESULTS

Two cases (7.7%) experienced ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after BCS-RT. The histology results at the time of IBTR showed invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and the median time to IBTR was 25.5 months. On the univariate analysis, there were no significant factors associated with IBTR in the DCIS patients. The three-year local recurrence free survival rate was 96.0% and the overall survival rate was 96.3%.

CONCLUSION

After the treatment for DCIS, the IBTR rate in our study was similar to other previous studies. Considering that we included patients who had many symptomatic lesions, close or positive margins and less that complete early data, our result is comparable to the previous studies. We could not find the prognostic significant factors associated with IBTR after BCS-RT. A longer follow up period with more patients would be required to evaluate the role of any predictive factors and to confirm these short-term results.

Predictors of local recurrence after breast-conservation therapy

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is a proven local treatment option for select patients with early-stage breast cancer. This paper reviews pathologic, clinical, and treatment-related features that have been identified as known or potential predictors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in patients treated with BCT. Pathologic risk factors such as the final pathologic margin status of the excised specimen after BCT, the extent of margin involvement, the interaction of margin status with other adverse features, the role of biomarkers, and the presence of an extensive intraductal component or lobular carcinoma in situ all impact the likelihood of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Predictors of positive repeat excision findings after conservative surgery include young age, presence of an extensive intraductal component, and close or positive margins in prior excision. Finally, treatment-related factors predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence include extent of breast radiation therapy, use of a boost to the lumpectomy cavity, use of tamoxifen or chemotherapeutic agents, and timing of systemic therapy with irradiation. The ability to predict for an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence enhances the ability to select optimal local treatment strategies for women considering BCT.

Long-term outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is detected most commonly on routine screening mammography in the asymptomatic patient, and has a long natural history. The objective of the current study was to determine the long-term outcome after breast-conservation surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation for women with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast.

METHODS

In total, 1003 women with unilateral, mammographically detected DCIS of the breast underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. These women were treated in 10 institutions in North America and Europe. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (mean, 9.0 years; range, 0.2-24.6 years).

RESULTS

The 15-year overall survival rate was 89%, and the 15-year cause-specific survival rate was 98%. The 15-year rate of freedom from distant metastases was 97%. In total, there were 100 local failures (10%) in the treated breast. The 15-year rate of any local failure was 19%, and the 15-year rate of local only first failure was 16%. Patient age > or = 50 years at the time of treatment and negative final pathology margins from the primary tumor excision both were associated independently with a lower risk of local failure in univariate analysis (P = 0.00062 and P = 0.024, respectively) and in multivariate analysis (P = 0.00057 and P = 0.0026, respectively). For favorable subgroups of patients age > or = 50 years or with negative resection margins, the 10-year risk of local failure was < or = 8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results support the use of breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of patients with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast. Patient age > or = 50 years at the time of treatment and negative resection margins both were associated independently with a decreased risk of local failure.

Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive form of breast cancer that has increased in incidence over the past 25 years, primarily as a result of mammographically detected microcalcifications. Inadequately treated DCIS carries a risk for evolving into the malignant phenotype; however, the magnitude and timeline for this risk are poorly defined. Treatment options include lumpectomy with or without breast irradiation and mastectomy. The overall survival rate is 96% to 98% with any of these strategies, but the risk of local recurrence (LR) is highest after lumpectomy alone. Breast irradiation can reduce this risk from levels in excess of 40% to 10% over a 10-year follow-up period. Approximately 50% of all LR from DCIS are invasive lesions. Therefore, the occurrence of a LR after breast-conserving therapy is a potentially greater threat to the patient with DCIS compared to the patient diagnosed with invasive cancer. In patients diagnosed with invasive cancer, the risk of micrometastatic disease is present from the time of initial diagnosis. In patients with DCIS, the expectation is that a potentially 100% cure rate should be achieved with local therapy alone. Although most DCIS cases complicated by LR will be successfully salvaged with prolonged overall survival, it is critically important to take every precaution that will minimize the risk of locally recurrent disease. Therefore, radiation therapy as an adjunct to lumpectomy is essential. A subset of patients with DCIS with low-volume low-grade disease who can be safely treated by lumpectomy alone has not yet been clearly defined. Prospective studies designed to identify this category are ongoing. Inadequate margin control is the most consistent risk factor for LR that has been reported thus far, but there is no universally accepted definition for what constitutes an optimal negative margin distance. Young age at diagnosis, high nuclear grade, and comedonecrosis are other factors that have been implicated as increasing the risk for LR. Tamoxifen can further decrease the rate of new in-breast events on the affected side and in the contralateral breast. Ongoing trials will also define the role of aromatase inhibitors as a risk-reducing strategy.

Radiotherapy to the conserved breast, chest wall, and regional nodes: is there a standard?

BACKGROUND

The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer has changed considerable during the last two decades. It has now become the standard part of the breast-conserving procedure, as well as in patients who underwent mastectomy with T3+tumor and/or 4 or more positive lymphnodes in axilla.

METHODS

Improvements are seen in the postmastectomy radiotherapy area by delivering better treatment techniques herewith avoiding treatment of the heart and lungs in order to optimize the improvement of local control and the significant improvement in survival. Indications exist that the largest impact of postmastectomy radiotherapy on survival is mostly seen in patients with minimal tumorload, i.e. small tumors and/or 1 or 2 positive lymphnodes.

RESULTS

In several clinical trials, it was shown that the relapse rate in the ipsilateral breast is reduced with a HR of 4 if whole breast irradiation is given after tumorectomy. The update of the Oxford meta-analysis demonstrated that this improvement in local control has also led to an improved survival in these patients. More information is recently gained on the required radiation dose in breast-conserving therapy. Especially patients less than 50 years of age have to be treated with a high radiation dose, 50 + 16 Gy boost, while a dose of 50 Gy in 5 weeks seems sufficient for patients older than 50 years, who have a microscopically complete excision. Further optimization of the radiotherapy technique is found in imaged guided approaches and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Combining these efforts allows for a more precise delivery of the radiation dose to a limited volume, so that the side effects like fibrosis will be reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial breast irradiation, instead of whole breast irradiation, is now being tested in a few randomized trials. Although this approach may be useful in certain patients groups, it still cannot be accepted as standard treatment, as no proper selection criteria exist and no long-term follow-up data have been presented.