Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Highly Reproducible Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Cells Reveals Proteome-Level Effects of a Novel Combination Drug Therapy That Induces Cancer Cell Death via Metabolic Remodeling and Activation of the Extrinsic Apoptosis Pathway

Pancreatic cancer patients have poor survival rates and are frequently treated using gemcitabine (Gem). However, initial tumor sensitivity often gives way to rapid development of resistance. Gem-based drug combinations are employed to increase efficacy and mitigate resistance, but our understanding of molecular-level drug interactions, which could assist in the development of more effective therapeutic regimens, is limited. Global quantitative proteomic analysis could provide novel mechanistic insights into drug combination interactions, but it is challenging to achieve high-quality quantitative proteomics analysis of the large sample sets that are typically required for drug combination studies. Here, we investigated molecular-level temporal interactions of Gem with BGJ398 (infigratinib), a recently approved pan-FGFR inhibitor, in multiple treatment groups (N = 42 samples) using IonStar, a robust large-scale proteomics method that employs well-controlled, ultrahigh-resolution MS1 quantification. A total of 5514 proteins in the sample set were quantified without missing data, requiring >2 unique peptides/protein, <1% protein false discovery rate (FDR), <0.1% peptide FDR, and CV < 10%. Functional analysis of the differentially altered proteins revealed drug-dysregulated processes such as metabolism, apoptosis, and antigen presentation pathways. These changes were validated experimentally using Seahorse metabolic assays and immunoassays. Overall, in-depth analysis of large-scale proteomics data provided novel insights into possible mechanisms by which FGFR inhibitors complement and enhance Gem activity in pancreatic cancers.

Microbiota in Pancreatic Diseases: A Review of the Literature

The gut microbiota is a critical element in the balance between human health and disease. Its impairment, defined as dysbiosis, is associated with gastroenterological and systemic diseases. Pancreatic secretions are involved in the composition and changes of the gut microbiota, and the gut microbiota may colonize the pancreatic parenchyma and be associated with the occurrence of diseases. The gut microbiota and the pancreas influence each other, resulting in a "gut microbiota-pancreas axis". Moreover, the gut microbiota may be involved in pancreatic diseases, both through direct bacterial colonization and an indirect effect of small molecules and toxins derived from dysbiosis. Pancreatic diseases such as acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer are common gastroenterological diseases associated with high morbidity and mortality. The involvement of the microbiota in pancreatic diseases is increasingly recognized. Therefore, modifying the intestinal bacterial flora could have important therapeutic implications on these pathologies. The aim of this study is to review the literature to evaluate the alterations of the gut microbiota in pancreatic diseases, and the role of the microbiota in the treatment of these diseases.

Implications of the microbiome in the development and treatment of pancreatic cancer: Thinking outside of the box by looking inside the gut

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. As one of the most lethal cancer types, the prognosis for patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer remains dismal and novel investigations are urgently needed. Evidence for an association of microbes with pancreatic cancer risk, development, treatment response, and post-treatment survivorship is rapidly developing. Herein, we provide an overview on the role of the microbiome as it relates to the natural history of pancreatic cancer, including host immune interactions, alterations in metabolism, direct carcinogenic effect, and its role in treatment response.

Redox Regulation in the Base Excision Repair Pathway: Old and New Players as Cancer Therapeutic Targets

BACKGROUND

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) are by-products of normal cellular metabolic processes, such as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. While low levels of ROS are important signalling molecules, high levels of ROS can damage proteins, lipids and DNA. Indeed, oxidative DNA damage is the most frequent type of damage in the mammalian genome and is linked to human pathologies such as cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Although oxidative DNA damage is cleared predominantly through the Base Excision Repair (BER) pathway, recent evidence suggests that additional pathways such as Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) and Mismatch Repair (MMR) can also participate in clearance of these lesions. One of the most common forms of oxidative DNA damage is the base damage 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), which if left unrepaired may result in G:C to A:T transversions during replication, a common mutagenic feature that can lead to cellular transformation.

OBJECTIVE

Repair of oxidative DNA damage, including 8-oxoG base damage, involves the functional interplay between a number of proteins in a series of enzymatic reactions. This review describes the role and the redox regulation of key proteins involved in the initial stages of BER of 8-oxoG damage, namely Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease 1 (APE1), human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase-1 (hOGG1) and human single-stranded DNA binding protein 1 (hSSB1). Moreover, the therapeutic potential and modalities of targeting these key proteins in cancer are discussed.

CONCLUSION

It is becoming increasingly apparent that some DNA repair proteins function in multiple repair pathways. Inhibiting these factors would provide attractive strategies for the development of more effective cancer therapies.

Can we downstage locally advanced pancreatic cancer to resectable? A phase I/II study of induction oxaliplatin and 5-FU chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Half of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) present with regionally advanced disease. This includes borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors as defined by current NCCN guidelines for resectability. Chemoradiation (CH-RT) is used in this setting in attempt to control local disease, and possibly downstage to resectable disease. We report a phase I/II trial of a combination of 5FU/Oxaliplatin with concurrent radiation in patients presenting with borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PC were eligible. Chemotherapy included continuous infusion 5FU (200 mg/m2) daily and oxaliplatin weekly for 5 weeks in dose escalation cohorts, ranging from 30 to 60 mg/m2. Concurrent radiation therapy consisted of 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions (180 cGy/fx/d) followed by a comedown to the tumor and margins for an additional 540 cGy ×3 (total dose 5,040 cGy in 28 fractions). Following completion of CH-RT, patients deemed resectable underwent surgery; those who remained unresectable for cure but did not progress (SD, stable disease) received mFOLFOX6 ×6 cycles. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. End-points of the phase II portion were resectability and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 subjects (15 men and 9 women, mean age 64.5 years) were enrolled between June 2004 and December 2009 and received CH-RT. Seventeen patients were enrolled in the Phase I component of the study, fifteen of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy. Reasons for not completing treatment included grade 3 toxicities (1 patient) and withdrawal of consent (1 patient). The highest dose of oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2) was well tolerated and it was used as the recommended phase II dose. An additional 7 patients were treated in the phase II portion, 5 of whom completed CH-RT; the remaining 2 patients did not complete treatment because of grade 3 toxicities. Overall, 4/24 did not complete CH-RT. Grade 4 toxicities related to initial CH-RT were observed during phase I (n=2, pulmonary embolism and lymphopenia) and phase II (n=3, fatigue, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia). Following restaging after completion of CH-RT, 4 patients had progressed (PD); 9 patients had SD and received additional chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (one of them had a dramatic response after two cycles and underwent curative resection); the remaining 7 patients (29.2%) were noted to have a response and were explored: 2 had PD, 4 had SD, still unresectable, and 1 patient was resected for cure with negative margins. Overall 2 patients (8.3%) in the study received curative resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Median overall survival for the entire study population was 11.4 months. Overall survival for the two resected patients was 41.7 and 21.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment for borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer with oxaliplatin, 5FU and radiation was reasonably well tolerated. The majority of patients remained unresectable. Survival data with this regimen were comparable to others for locally advanced pancreas cancer, suggesting the need for more novel approaches.

Biological determinants of radioresistance and their remediation in pancreatic cancer

Despite recent advances in radiotherapy, a majority of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PC) do not achieve objective responses due to the existence of intrinsic and acquired radioresistance. Identification of molecular mechanisms that compromise the efficacy of radiation therapy and targeting these pathways is paramount for improving radiation response in PC patients. In this review, we have summarized molecular mechanisms associated with the radio-resistant phenotype of PC. Briefly, we discuss the reversible and irreversible biological consequences of radiotherapy, such as DNA damage and DNA repair, mechanisms of cancer cell survival and radiation-induced apoptosis following radiotherapy. We further describe various small molecule inhibitors and molecular targeting agents currently being tested in preclinical and clinical studies as potential radiosensitizers for PC. Notably, we draw attention towards the confounding effects of cancer stem cells, immune system, and the tumor microenvironment in the context of PC radioresistance and radiosensitization. Finally, we discuss the need for examining selective radioprotectors in light of the emerging evidence on radiation toxicity to non-target tissue associated with PC radiotherapy.

Long-term analysis of gemcitabine-based chemoradiation after surgical resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy in terms of local control (LC) of 24 h infusion of gemcitabine plus radiotherapy after surgery for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Weekly gemcitabine (100 mg/m(2)) was provided as a 24-hour infusion during the course of radiotherapy (50.4 Gy to the tumor, 39.6 Gy to the nodes). Patients subsequently received five cycles of gemcitabine monochemotherapy (1,000 mg/m(2) 1, 8, q21). The primary end point of the study was to achieve a 2-year LC rate of ≥80 % with type I and II errors of 5 and 20 %. The study was designed to accrue a maximum sample size of 35 patients. Secondary end points were toxicity evaluation, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Data of 35 patients were available. Most of the patients (n = 27; 77.1 %) had duodeno-cephalo-pancreatectomy, 5 (14.3 %) distal pancreatectomy, and 3 (8.6 %) total pancreatectomy. The pathological stages were T1-T2 (n = 7; 20.0 %), T3-T4 (n = 28; 80.0 %), N0 (n = 17; 48.6 %), and N1 (n = 18; 51.4 %). Thirty patients (85.7 %) completed chemoradiation. Twenty-three patients (65.7 %) received further sequential chemotherapy. Acute toxicity was acceptable. No late toxicity occurred. The median follow-up period was 64 (range 24-118) months, and 2-year crude rate of LC was 83 (median not reached). Median MFS and OS were 26.5 and 22.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of LC met the main goal of the study. The regimen resulted in a high LC rate but failed to show a benefit in terms of OS or MFS, thus suggesting the need for a more intensified multimodal approach.

Combinational therapy: new hope for pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a low overall survival rate. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for patients presenting with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine achieves a modest improvement in overall survival and is the gold standard for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Capecitabine and S-1, derivatives of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), offers minimal clinical benefits. Folfirinox represents a new and aggressive regimen that might benefit patients of metastatic pancreatic cancer with good performance status. Other chemotherapy drugs such as platinums and irinotecan do not provide significant improvement in overall survival, but have been used as part of combinational therapies. Comparing to systemically delivered chemotherapy, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy achieves higher local drug concentration in tumors with lower systemic drug toxicity, and may serve as a better treatment regimen. Although there have been progress made in chemotherapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer, the overall survival is not significantly improved in the last decade. Recently, development of chemotherapy in combination with molecular targeted therapies holds great promise in pancreatic cancer treatment, especially in patients with metastatic disease. Growing bodies of preclinical and clinical evidences indicate that the combination of conventional modalities with specific molecular targeted therapy increase the efficacy of the monotherapy without an increase in toxicity. In this review, we summarized the current regimens of chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and highlighted the novel combinational treatments tested in recent clinical trials.

Activation of nuclear TR3 (NR4A1) by a diindolylmethane analog induces apoptosis and proapoptotic genes in pancreatic cancer cells and tumors

NR4A1 (Nur77, TR3) is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and activation of TR3 by 1,1-bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-methoxyphenyl)methane (DIM-C-pPhOCH(3)) inhibits cell and tumor growth and induces apoptosis. Microarray analysis demonstrates that in L3.6pL pancreatic cancer cells DIM-C-pPhOCH(3) induces genes associated with metabolism, homeostasis, signal transduction, transcription, stress, transport, immune responses, growth inhibition and apoptosis. Among the most highly induced growth inhibitory and proapoptotic genes including activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3), p21, cystathionase, dual specificity phosphatase 1 and growth differentiation factor 15, RNA interference studies demonstrated that induction of all but the later gene by DIM-C-pPhOCH(3) were TR3-dependent. We also observed that DIM-C-pPhOCH(3) induced Fas ligand and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and induction of TRAIL was ATF3 dependent. Results of this and previous studies demonstrate that TR3 is unique among nuclear receptors since nuclear TR3 is activated or deactivated by diindolylmethane derivatives to induce different apoptotic and growth inhibitory pathways that inhibit pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth.

Inhibition of NFkappaB and pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth by curcumin is dependent on specificity protein down-regulation

Curcumin activates diverse anticancer activities that lead to inhibition of cancer cell and tumor growth, induction of apoptosis, and antiangiogenic responses. In this study, we observed that curcumin inhibits Panc28 and L3.6pL pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth in nude mice bearing L3.6pL cells as xenografts. In addition, curcumin decreased expression of p50 and p65 proteins and NFkappaB-dependent transactivation and also decreased Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 transcription factors that are overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cells. Because both Sp transcription factors and NFkappaB regulate several common genes such as cyclin D1, survivin, and vascular endothelial growth factor that contribute to the cancer phenotype, we also investigated interactions between Sp and NFkappaB transcription factors. Results of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 knockdown by RNA interference demonstrate that both p50 and p65 are Sp-regulated genes and that inhibition of constitutive or tumor necrosis factor-induced NFkappaB by curcumin is dependent on down-regulation of Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins by this compound. Curcumin also decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and induced reactive oxygen species in pancreatic cancer cells, and this pathway is required for down-regulation of Sp proteins in these cells, demonstrating that the mitochondriotoxic effects of curcumin are important for its anticancer activities.

Improved plasma stability and sustained release profile of gemcitabine via polypeptide conjugation

To enhance the stability of the anticancer drug gemcitabine (2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine), it was conjugated to poly-l-glutamic acid (PG-H) via a carbodiimide reaction. The synthesised poly-l-glutamic acid-gemcitabine (PG-G) was purified and characterised by using SDS-PAGE to estimate its molecular weight, HPLC to determine its purity and degree of drug loading, and NMR to elucidate the structure. In vitro aqueous hydrolytic studies showed that the gemcitabine release from the polymeric drug conjugate was pH dependent, and that the conjugation to PG-H improved its stability in human plasma. The release of the bound gemcitabine from PG-G in plasma was mediated by a hydrolytic process. It began with a lag phase, followed by linear release between 12 and 48h, and reached equilibrium at 72h with 51% of the gemcitabine released. In vitro cytotoxicity studies using MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human mammary cancer cells, as well as human dermal fibroblasts (HDF), showed that PG-G displayed a lower dose dependent cytotoxic effect with respect to the parent drug gemcitabine. On the other hand, in 4T1 mouse mammary tumour cells, PG-G and gemcitabine showed similar toxicities. Gemcitabine was more than likely released hydrolytically from PG-G and taken up by MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and HDF, whereas both released gemcitabine and PG-G were taken up by 4T1 to mediate the observed cytotoxicities. The improved stability and extended sustained release profile may render PG-G a potential anticancer prodrug.

Structure-dependent activation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis in pancreatic cancer by 1,1-bis(3'-indoly)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes

1,1-Bis(3'-indoly)-1-(p-substituted phenyl)methanes (C-DIM) exhibit structure-dependent activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and nerve growth factor-induced Balpha (Nur77) and induce receptor-dependent and receptor-independent apoptosis in cancer cells and tumors. In this study, we investigated the activation of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells by p-bromo (DIM-C-pPhBr) and p-fluoro (DIM-C-pPhF) and structurally related analogues that do not activate either peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma or Nur77. The ortho, meta, and para-bromo and -fluoro isomers all activated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-dependent apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells; however, methylation of the indole N group significantly decreased activity, suggesting that a free N was important for activation of ER stress. Both DIM-C-pPhBr and DIM-C-pPhF resembled the classic ER stress inducer thapsigargin in pancreatic cancer cells and activated ER stress markers, such as glucose-related protein 78 and the c-Jun NH(2) kinase pathway, resulting in the induction of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein, death receptor 5, and the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Moreover, DIM-C-pPhBr also inhibited tumor growth in an orthotopic model for pancreatic cancer, demonstrating the clinical potential for this C-DIM compound in pancreatic cancer chemotherapy.

The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Pancreatic cancer: from pathogenesis to cure

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. The disease has a high mortality rate and the 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 4%. Currently, surgical resection is only possible in 20% of patients; even then, the overall 5-year survival rate is only 25%. As such, surgical therapy alone is not sufficient for pancreatic carcinoma, and prospective investigation of additional modalities is crucial. Numerous negative trials have shown that chemotherapy alone is the standard of care after resection of pancreatic carcinoma. However, results remain poor and progress with new drugs is needed in this setting. For locally advanced disease, the situation is more complicated; the ideal chemoradiation schedule has not been clearly defined, and improvements could come in the near future from the use of new radiotherapy tools and targeted therapies. For advanced disease, chemotherapy alone has given very disappointing results. A multidisciplinary approach combining biological assessment of targets with clinical trials to evaluate new targeted drugs should be considered.

Increased survival using platinum analog combined with gemcitabine as compared to single-agent gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: pooled analysis of two randomized trials, the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup study and a German multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine combined with a platinum agent compared to single-agent gemcitabine in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials.

METHODS

The French Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Group (GERCOR)/Italian Group for the Study of Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer (GISCAD) intergroup study comparing gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin to gemcitabine and a German multicenter trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine were included in a pooled analysis based on individual patient data.

RESULTS

Among 503 evaluable patients, 252 received gemcitabine plus a platinum analog (GP), while 251 patients were treated with gemcitabine alone. For progression-free survival (PFS), the pooled univariate analysis indicated a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (P = 0.0030) in favour of the GP combination. The benefit from the GP combination was greatest in the subgroup of patients with performance status (PS) = 0 (HR = 0.64; P = 0.013). Also overall survival was significantly superior in patients receiving the GP combination (HR = 0.81; P = 0.031). Again, patients with PS = 0 appeared to have a greater benefit from treatment intensification (HR = 0.72; P = 0.063).

CONCLUSION

The pooled analysis of the GERCOR/GISCAD intergroup study and the German multicenter study indicates that the combination of gemcitabine with a platinum analog such as oxaliplatin or cisplatin significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival as compared to single-agent gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. The benefit seems to prevail in patients with a good performance status.

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of gemcitabine plus cisplatin with single-agent gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (GemCis arm) or gemcitabine alone at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week regimen (Gem arm). The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points were progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-five patients were enrolled and showed baseline characteristics well balanced between treatment arms. Combination treatment in the GemCis arm was associated with a prolonged median progression-free survival (5.3 months v 3.1 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75; P = .053). Also, median overall survival was superior for patients treated in the GemCis arm as compared with the Gem arm (7.5 v 6.0 months), an advantage which did not, however, reach statistical significance (HR = 0.80; P = .15). Tumor response rates were comparable between treatment arms (10.2% v 8.2%). The rate of stable disease was, however, greater in the combination arm (60.2% v 40.2%; P < .001). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity did not exceed 15% in both treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

These results support the efficacy and safety of an every-2-weeks treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were more favorable in the combination arm as compared with gemcitabine alone, although the difference did not attain statistical significance.

Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells by Sp proteins

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2/KDR) is an important mediator of angiogenesis, and VEGFR2 mRNA is expressed in several pancreatic cancer cell lines. Deletion analysis of the VEGFR2 promoter in Panc-1, AsPC-1, and MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells shows that the proximal region of the promoter is primarily responsible for VEGFR2 expression, and two GC-rich sites at -58 and -44 are critical elements in all three cell lines. Panc-1, AsPC-1, and MiaPaCa-2 cells also express Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 proteins which bind to the GC-rich region of the VEGFR2 promoter in electrophoretic mobility shift and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. RNA interference with small inhibitory RNAs for Sp1, Sp3, and Sp4 decreases VEGFR2 mRNA and reporter gene activity in transfection assays, confirming that VEGFR2 expression in pancreatic cancer cells is regulated by Sp proteins. These results suggest that VEGFR2 cannot only be targeted by receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors but also by drugs that downregulate Sp proteins or block Sp-dependent transactivation.

Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose gemcitabine regimens in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A prospective, randomized study was performed to determine whether gemcitabine infusion at a low dose (250 mg/m2) is comparable or superior to the standard-dose infusion (1000 mg/m2) in terms of the survival period, clinical benefit, and frequency of adverse effects in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who were histologically proven to have locally advanced pancreatic cancer or pancreatic cancer with distant metastases were initially enrolled in the present study. They were treated with gemcitabine infusion at either a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min (the standard regimen) on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle or at a dose of 250 mg/m2 over 30 min every week. Survival time, response rate, time to treatment failure, clinical benefit response, and adverse effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received gemcitabine for more than 1 month. The median survival period was 7.2 months for patients who received the low-dose infusion regimen, in contrast to 5.2 months for patients administered the standard-dose infusion regimen. The time to treatment failure was 5.6 months for patients in the low-dose infusion regimen, in contrast to 3.4 months for patients in the standard-dose infusion regimen. There were no significant differences in either survival time to time to treatment failure or clinical benefits between the two groups, but the incidence of adverse reactions in patients administered the low-dose therapy was significantly lower than that in patients receiving the standard-dose therapy (P<0.05). In particular, patients in the standard infusion regimen group experienced more hematologic toxicity than those in the low-dose regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the low-dose gemcitabine infusion regimen can be continuously administered to patients with locally advanced and systemically spreading pancreatic cancer because of its reduced toxicity, resulting in better quality of life and an improved safety profile as compared to the standard infusion treatment regimen.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 promotes migration and invasion in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) is one of three receptor tyrosine kinases for VEGF, a key regulator of angiogenesis in cancer. Although VEGFRs initially were believed to be expressed exclusively on endothelial cells (ECs), recent studies have demonstrated the presence of VEGFR-1 on non-EC types. The authors hypothesized that VEGFR-1 is present and functional in pancreatic carcinoma cells, contributing to the malignant phenotype.

METHODS

The authors assessed the expression of VEGFR-1 and its ligands in 11 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines by reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and/or Western blot analysis. The function of VEGFR-1 was evaluated by treating two representative cell lines with VEGF-B, a selective ligand for VEGFR-1, and/or a specific anti-VEGFR-1 antibody and assessing the effects on signaling, migration, invasion, and proliferation.

RESULTS

All 11 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines expressed VEGFR-1 mRNA and protein, as well as the VEGFR-1 ligands VEGF-A and VEGF-B. Two representative cell lines (L3.6 and Panc-1) exhibited VEGF-B-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. A VEGFR-1 neutralizing antibody abrogated signaling, confirming that the ligand effect was mediated through VEGFR-1. VEGFR-1 stimulation by VEGF-A or VEGF-B was found to promote migration in both cell lines. Panc-1 cells also demonstrated enhanced Matrigel invasion after VEGFR-1 stimulation. VEGFR-1-dependent migration and invasion were blocked by the VEGFR-1 neutralizing antibody. VEGFR-1 activation did not appear to enhance cell proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

VEGFR-1 appears to be expressed ubiquitously in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, in which it induces signaling and promotes migration and invasion. Overexpression of VEGF in tumors may activate tumor cells bearing VEGFR-1 via an autocrine pathway. Agents targeting VEGF or its receptors may have a dual inhibitory effect on tumor growth by suppressing both angiogenesis and tumor cell function.

Adenovirus-mediated interferon alpha gene transfer induces regional direct cytotoxicity and possible systemic immunity against pancreatic cancer

We previously demonstrated a characteristically high sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) gene transfer, which induced a more prominent growth suppression and cell death in pancreatic cancer cells than in other types of cancers and normal cells. The IFN-alpha protein can exhibit both direct cytotoxicity and indirect immunological antitumour activity. Here, we dissected and examined the two mechanisms, taking advantage of the fact that IFN-alpha did not show any cross-species activity in its in vivo effect. When a human IFN-alpha adenovirus was injected into subcutaneous xenografts of human pancreatic cancer cells in nude mice, tumour growth was significantly suppressed due to cell death in an adenoviral dose-dependent manner. The IFN-alpha protein concentration was markedly increased in the injected subcutaneous tumour, but leakage of the potent cytokine into the systemic blood circulation was minimal. When a mouse IFN-alpha adenovirus was injected into the same subcutaneous tumour system, all mice showed significant tumour inhibition, an effect that was dependent on the indirect antitumour activities of IFN-alpha, notably a stimulation of natural killer cells. Moreover, in this case, tumour regression was observed not only for the injected subcutaneous tumours but also for the untreated tumours at distant sites. This study suggested that a local IFN-alpha gene therapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer, due to its dual mechanisms of antitumour activities and lack of significant toxicity.

Current management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Almost 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with large, locally advanced tumors in the absence of distant metastases. Because surgical resection is frequently contraindicated by vascular invasion, locally advanced pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis with a 6-10-month median survival. Recent advances in the multimodality treatment of other gastrointestinal malignancies have not altered the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a clinical dilemma reflected by the number of nonrandomized trials and anecdotal reports addressing this difficult disease. Our review summarizes the current status of aggressive surgical resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and suggests a treatment algorithm for patients with this disease based upon published clinical evidence.

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Chromosomal imbalances associated with drug resistance and thermoresistance in human pancreatic carcinoma cells

Resistance to therapeutic treatment is the major obstacle to advances in the successful management of pancreatic cancer. To characterize chromosomal alterations associated with different phenotypes of acquired multidrug resistance (MDR) and thermoresistance, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was applied to compare human pancreatic carcinoma-derived cells. This panel of cell lines consists of the parental, drug- and thermosensitive pancreatic carcinoma cell line EPP85 - 181P, its atypical MDR variant EPP85-181RNOV, the classical MDR subline EPP85-181RDB, and their thermoresistant counterparts EPP85-181P-TR, EPP85-181RNOV-TR, and EPP85 - 181RDB-TR, respectively. CGH using genomic DNA prepared from these cell lines as probes successfully identified genomic gains and/or losses in chromosomal regions encoding putative genes associated with drug resistance and/or thermoresistance. These genes included 23 members of the family of ABC transporters, 27 members of the family of cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases, various molecular chaperones, DNA repair enzymes, and factors involved in the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis. The importance of these cell variant-specific genomic imbalances in the development of MDR and thermoresistance is discussed and remains to be elucidated.

Inhibition of SRC tyrosine kinase as treatment for human pancreatic cancer growing orthotopically in nude mice

PURPOSE

The Src family comprises a family of nonreceptor intracellular tyrosine kinases that mediate a variety of cellular pathways. Src kinases are overexpressed in a variety of human tumors, including cancer of the colon, breast, and pancreas, and they are an integral part of tumor cell signaling pathways associated with migration, proliferation, adhesion, and angiogenesis.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We investigated whether the blockade of Src kinase by daily oral administration of the novel Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor AZM475271 [kindly provided by AstraZeneca (Macclesfield, United Kingdom)], alone or in combination with intraperitoneal gemcitabine, can inhibit growth and metastasis of orthotopically implanted human pancreatic carcinoma cells in nude mice.

RESULTS

Treatment with AZM475271 alone reduced the primary pancreatic tumor volume by approximately 40%, whereas AZM475271 plus gemcitabine reduced tumor volume by 90%. Furthermore, treatment with AZM475271 and gemcitabine significantly reduced metastasis: none of eight animals who received the combination treatment had lymph node or liver metastases, compared with five of five and three of five animals, respectively, in the control group (P = 0.001). Src inhibition by AZM475271 (alone or with gemcitabine) was associated with significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation, decreased tumor microvessel density, and increased apoptosis in vivo. Moreover, these effects were all significantly increased when gemcitabine was combined with AZM475271 compared with gemcitabine alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Src inhibition by AZM475271, either alone or in combination with gemcitabine, demonstrated significant antitumor and antimetastatic activity in an orthotopic nude mouse model for human pancreatic cancer. The combination of AZM475271 with gemcitabine sensitized tumor cells to the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine.

A phase II study of raltitrexed and gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas has a very poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a combination of the chemotherapeutic agents gemcitabine and raltitrexed. Chemonaïve patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with a combination of raltitrexed (3.5 mg m⁻² on day 1 of a 21-day treatment cycle) and gemcitabine (800 mg m⁻² intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). Between April 2000 and February 2003, 27 patients were enrolled onto the study. The mean duration of treatment was 11 weeks. Four of 27 patients experienced at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. One patient with grade 4 neutropenia died due to sepsis. Four of 27 patients experienced grade 4 diarrhoea. There was one partial remission (4%) and 12 patients experienced disease stabilisation (44%). The 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 37 and 11%, respectively. Symptomatic benefit occurred in seven (26%) patients. We conclude that a combination of raltitrexed and gemcitabine, using the schedule and doses in this study, cannot be recommended for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Effects of gemcitabine on APE/ref-1 endonuclease activity in pancreatic cancer cells, and the therapeutic potential of antisense oligonucleotides

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (APE) is a key enzyme involved in DNA base excision repair (BER) that is often expressed at elevated levels in human cancers. Pancreatic cancer cells treated with the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluoro-2′deoxycytidine) showed increases in APE/redox effector factor (ref-1) protein levels (approximately two-fold for Panc-1 and six-fold for MiaPaCa-2), with corresponding increases in endonuclease activity. These results suggested that the activation of APE/ref-1 might be an adaptive response that contributes to gemcitabine resistance by facilitating BER. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effects of disrupting APE/ref-1 using antisense on gemcitabine toxicity. Antisense oligonucleotides decreased protein levels three-fold in MiaPaCa-2 and five-fold in Panc-1 in comparison to controls, associated with reduced endonuclease activity. Combination treatments with antisense oligonucleotides and gemcitabine partially suppressed the increase in APE/ref-1 activity seen in cells exposed to gemcitabine alone. While clonogenic assays showed only slight decreases in colony formation in cells treated with either antisense oligonucleotides or gemcitabine alone, the combination with APE/ref-1 antisense resulted in a 2-log enhancement of gemcitabine toxicity in Panc-1 cells. Overall these findings suggest that APE/ref-1 plays a significant role in gemcitabine resistance in some pancreatic cancer cells, and support the further investigation of novel treatments that target this protein.

Combined therapy of experimental pancreatic cancer with CYP2B1 producing cells: Low-dose ifosfamide and local tumor irradiation

Local therapy of pancreatic cancer with microencapsulated CYP2B1-producing cells and ifosfamide showed an effect both on the primary tumor and on distant metastatases. This possibly represents a consequence of the activation of immune response. Other studies have demonstrated that local tumor irradiation leads to the activation of the intratumoral lymphocyte infiltration. The aim of our study was to investigate the efficacy of the combined therapy with low-dose irradiation, ifosfamide and CYP2B1-producing cells. Syngenic pancreatic cancer was induced in 38 Lewis-rats by subcutaneous inoculation of 1 x 10(6) (DSL6A) tumor cells. Microencapsulated CYP2B1-producing cells were injected peritumorally 10--12 weeks after tumor implantation. Animals were randomized to the following groups: 1) control (NaCl, 1 ml i.p.), 2) ifosfamide (50 mg/kg, i.p., (3x/week), 3) local irradiation with 5 Gy and 4) ifosfamide plus irradiation. The tumor growth was monitored for 3 weeks. The tumor infiltration with CD4+, CD8+, NK-cells, microvessel density and proliferation rates were investigated by immunohistochemistry. Cytokine plasma level for TNF-alpha were measured by ELISA. Seven of 9 animals in the group of combined therapy showed an objective response to the therapy. The therapy with ifosfamide or radiation alone showed 5 and 3 responders, respectively. The mean tumor volume was significantly reduced after combined ifosfamide plus radiation therapy in the first week, whereas monotherapy with ifosfamide or radiation significantly decreased tumor growth earliest after 2 and 3 weeks, respectively. The high plasma level of TNF-alpha in the control group was significantly reduced after combined ifosfamide/irradiation treatment. The lymphocyte infiltration and tumor proliferation were not significantly different between the groups. Microvascular density was significantly increased after ifosfamide and ifosfamide plus irradiation therapy. The combination of ifosfamide/CYP2B1-producing cells and irradiation showed an earlier therapeutical effect on the growth of rat pancreatic cancer than the irradiation or ifosfamide alone. There was no evidence of late activation of lymphocyte infiltration and PCNA-positive tumor cells.

Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded liposomes in human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Identification of effective systemic antineoplastic drugs against anaplastic thyroid carcinomas has particularly important implications. In fact, the efficacy of the chemotherapeutic agents presently used in these tumours, is strongly limited by their low therapeutic index.

METHODS

In this study gemcitabine was entrapped within a pegylated liposomal delivery system to improve the drug antitumoral activity, thus exploiting the possibility to reduce doses to be administered in cancer therapy. The cytotoxic effects of free or liposome-entrapped gemcitabine was evaluated against a human thyroid tumour cell line. ARO cells, derived from a thyroid anaplastic carcinoma, were exposed to different concentrations of the drug. Liposomes formulations were made up of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine/cholesterol/1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-MPEG (8:3:1 molar ratio). Cell viability was assessed by both trypan bleu dye exclusion assay and fluorimetric analysis of cell DNA content.

RESULTS

A cytotoxic effect of free gemcitabine was present only after 72 h incubation (ARO cell mortality increased of approximately 4 fold over control at 1 microM, 7 fold at 100 microM). When gemcitabine was encapsulated in liposomes, a significant effect was observed by using lower concentrations of the drug (increased cell mortality of 2.4 fold vs. control at 0.3 microM) and earlier exposure time (24 h).

CONCLUSION

These findings show that, in vitro against human thyroid cancer cells, the gemcitabine incorporation within liposomes enhances the drug cytotoxic effect with respect to free gemcitabine, thus suggesting a more effective drug uptake inside the cells. This may allow the use of new formulations with lower dosages (side effect free) for the treatment of anaplastic human thyroid tumours.

Transferrin receptor is a marker of malignant phenotype in human pancreatic cancer and in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas

Transferrin receptor (TFRC) is a membrane-bound protein expressed in larger amounts in proliferating, e.g., malignant, cells than in quiescent cells. The specific expression of TFRC can represent a diagnostic tool or a therapeutic target in solid tumours expressing this antigen. Whether TFRC is expressed in human pancreatic tumours is unknown. The aim of this study was the investigation of the expression of TFRC and transferrin in human pancreatic cancer and in neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Fifty one specimens of human pancreatic cancer and 14 samples of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours were obtained after surgery. The expression of TFRC, transferrin and cytokeratin was studied by standard immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was used for the investigation of TFRC expression in nine cell lines of ductal pancreatic cancer in vitro. In contrast to normal tissue, 93% of pancreatic tumour cells showed positive (82%) or heterogeneous (11%) expression of TFRC. It was strongly expressed by malignant epithelial cells; normal stromal and endothelial cells were not stained by anti-TFRC antibodies. Primary tumours and metastases showed a similar frequency of TFRC expression. Three neuroendocrine carcinomas showed positive expression of TFRC by malignant tumour cells. The expression of TFRC was negative in benign neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. The cell lines of pancreatic cancer were characterised by a low expression of TFRC in vitro. In contrast to normal pancreatic tissue and benign neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas, pancreatic cancer and neuroendocrine carcinoma are therefore characterised frequently by high expression of TFRC. Hence, TFRC represents a marker of malignant transformation in the pancreas that could be applied as potential diagnostic and therapeutic target.

Regional perfusion chemotherapy via arterial chemotherapy pump after extended resection for pancreatic cancer

AIM: To improve the survival rate of pancreatic cancer patients after extended pancreatectomy.

METHODS: The clinical data of pancreatic cancer patients were reviewed after extended pancreatectomy, without adjuvant therapy (control group, n = 27) or with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regional perfusion via arterial chemotherapy pump (5-FU group, n = 30), and the prognosis of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS: The survival rate in 5-FU group (median survival time = 16 mo) was significantly better than that in control group (median survival time = 12 mo) (P<0.05, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Log rank test); The 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates in 5-FU group were 37% and 26% respectively, significantly better than those in the control group (15% and 5% respectively) (P < 0.05, x² test); The cumulative rate of death by hepatic metastasis alone in 5-FU group was significantly lower than that in control group (P < 0.05, Log rank test); The WHO grade toxicities of 5-FU group generally were WHO Ⅰ and Ⅱ, and no WHO Ⅳ toxic events were observed.

CONCLUSION: 5-FU regional perfusion chemotherapy via arterial chemotherapy pump after extended resection for pancreatic cancer can reduce the hepatic metastasis with relatively mild toxicities and increase the survival rate of the patients.