Tolerability and efficacy of the cancer vaccine UV1 in patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1 positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma planned for first-line treatment with pembrolizumab - the randomized phase 2 FOCUS trial

Background

Globally, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the seventh most common malignancy. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment approaches, recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) disease develops in >50% of patients. In this setting, pembrolizumab was approved for patients with PD-L1 expression. However, response rates with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy remain limited and strategies to strengthen tumor-directed immune responses are needed.

Objective

The FOCUS trial is designed to estimate the effectiveness of UV1 vaccination in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab as a single agent in patients with R/M HNSCC.

Methods and analysis

The FOCUS trial is a two-armed, randomized, multicenter phase II study which was designed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of the hTERT-targeted cancer vaccine UV1 as add-on to pembrolizumab in the 1st line treatment of patients with R/M PD-L1 positive (combined positive score ≥1) HNSCC. Secondary objectives are the exploration of patient subgroups most likely deriving benefit from this novel combination and the establishment of liquid biopsy tumor monitoring in HNSCC.

Ethics and dissemination

This clinical study was designed and will be conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It is intended to publish the results of this study in peer-reviewed scientific journals and to present its content at academic conferences.

Conclusions

A significant number of patients with R/M HNSCC are frail and may not tolerate chemotherapy, these patients may only be suitable for pembrolizumab monotherapy. However, long term disease stabilizations remain the exception and there is a need for the development of efficacious combination regimens for this patient population. The FOCUS study aims to optimize treatment of R/M HNSCC patients with this promising new treatment approach.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05075122, identifier NCT05075122.

Ramucirumab, Avelumab, and Paclitaxel as Second-Line Treatment in Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: The Phase 2 RAP (AIO-STO-0218) Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy has been associated with improved outcomes in metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, but treatment combinations and optimal patient selection need to be established.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1) inhibitor avelumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, single-group, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted among patients with second-line metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Patients pretreated with platinum plus fluoropyrimidine between April 2019 and November 2020 across 10 German centers (median follow-up, 27.4 months [95% CI 22.0-32.9 months]) were included. Data analysis was performed from January to December 2022.

Interventions

Patients received ramucirumab at 8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, avelumab at 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified primary end point was overall survival (OS) rate at 6 months, with the experimental therapy considered insufficiently active with an OS rate of 50% or less and a promising candidate with an OS rate of 65% or greater.

Results

Of 60 enrolled patients, 59 patients (median [range] age, 64 [18-81] years; 47 males [70.7%]) were evaluable, including 30 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach and 29 patients with gastroesophageal junction. All patients were pretreated with platinum plus fluoropyrimidine, and 40 patients (67.8%) had received prior taxanes; 24 of 56 evaluable patients (42.9%) had a PDL-1 combined positive score (CPS) of 5 or greater, centrally assessed. The OS rate at 6 months was 71.2% (95% CI, 61.5%-83.7%). The median OS in the intention-to-treat population (59 patients) was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.4-12.8 months) overall. Among patients assessable by central pathology, median OS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.7 months) in 32 patients with a PDL-1 CPS less than 5 and 14.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-22.1 months) in 24 patients with a PDL-1 CPS of 5 or greater (P = .25). Treatment was generally well tolerated, without unexpected toxicities. Patients with higher vs lower than median T cell repertoire richness showed an increased median OS of 20.4 months (95% CI, 7.7-33.0 months) compared with 8.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-12.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.81; P = .008). Patients with lower vs higher than median cell-free DNA burden had a median OS of 19.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-29.6 months) compared with 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.2-11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.59; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, the combination of avelumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab showed favorable efficacy and tolerability in the second-line treatment for metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. A PDL-1 CPS score of 5 or greater, cell-free DNA level less than the median, and T cell repertoire richness greater than the median were associated with increased median OS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03966118.

Nivolumab Switch Maintenance Therapy After Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Induction in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial by the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors of the German Cancer Society (NIVOSWITCH; AIO-NZK-0116ass)

BACKGROUND

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) maintenance therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is undefined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether switch maintenance therapy with nivolumab improves clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This open-label phase 2 trial randomized patients with a partial response or stable disease after 10-12-wk TKI induction therapy to either TKI or nivolumab maintenance. Key inclusion criteria were measurable disease, clear cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous nivolumab 8 × 240 mg every 2 wk, followed by 480 mg every 4 wk or sunitinib 50 mg (4-2 regimen) or pazopanib 800 mg once daily orally.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES

The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03), and patient-reported outcomes (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index). The Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank tests, and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Maintenance therapy was nivolumab for 25 patients (51.0%) and TKI for 24 (48.9%). The median age was 65 yr (range 35-79). Nine patients (18.4%) were female, 31 (63.3%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 15 (30.6%) had favorable risk. OS data are immature (17 deaths, 34.7%). The ORR was 20.0% (n = 5) for nivolumab and 52.2% (n = 12) for TKI. PFS was worse with nivolumab (hazard ratio 2.57, 95% confidence interval 1.36-4.89; p = 0.003). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 14 patients (56.0%) with nivolumab and 17 (70.8%) with TKI. A major limitation is early termination of our study.

CONCLUSIONS

TKI treatment achieved superior ORR and PFS in comparison to nivolumab maintenance therapy. Our data do not indicate a role for nivolumab switch maintenance in mRCC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Patients with metastatic kidney cancer who experienced a tumor response or disease stabilization after a short period of targeted treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor did not benefit from a switch to the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. Patients who continued their original treatment achieved better responses and a longer time without disease progression. This trial is registered on EudraCT as 2016-002170-13 and on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02959554.

SLiM CRAB criteria revisited: temporal trends in prognosis of patients with smoldering multiple myeloma who meet the definition of ‘biomarker-defined early multiple myeloma’—a systematic review with meta-analysis

Background

Biomarker-defined patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) were included in the diagnostic category of multiple myeloma (MM) by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) in 2014. This includes ≥60% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), free light chain ratio (FLCratio) ≥100, and >1 MRI-defined ≥5 mm focal lesion, also called SLiM CRAB MM. We examined whether the risk of progression of SLiM CRAB MM patients to CRAB positive MM described in recent studies differs from that reported in earlier studies published before the introduction of the new diagnostic criteria.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis, and included studies on Embase and PubMed (01/01/2010-01/11/2022), selecting studies with digitizable progression curves. Inconsistent studies were excluded. We created forest plots using random effects models from digitized and published data and Kaplan-Meier curves. Main outcomes were median time to progression (TTP), 2-year progression risk, and odds ratios (ORs) comparing 2-year progression risks.

Findings

Our meta-analysis including 11 studies with 3482 patients found an approximately 3-fold longer TTP and 50% lower 2-year progression risk of SliM CRAB MM patients in recent (published after 2014) compared with earlier studies. Median TTP in patients with ≥60% BMPCs was 30.31 months [18.71-62.93] in recent compared with 9.20 months [6.02-15.56] in earlier studies; the 2-year progression risk was 45.45% [20.12-62.75] compared with 86.21% [65.74-94.45] in the respective time periods. In patients with a FLCratio ≥ 100, the median TTP was 48.06 months [40.51-64.91] vs. 15.33 months [9.38-19.10], and the 2-year progression risk was 31.61% [25.30-37.39] vs. 73.00% [62.39-80.62] in recent and earlier studies, respectively. Tests for heterogeneity showed that the two time periods differed significantly in their ORs when comparing patients who met the high-and low risk criteria. No appropriate recent studies on focal lesions have been published.

Interpretation

Recent studies show significantly improved prognosis of biomarker-defined MM with ≥60% BMPCs and FLCratio ≥ 100. This warrants careful evaluation for signs of progression before treatment initiation.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Austrian Forum against Cancer.

Perioperative or only adjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreatic cancer (NEONAX)-a randomized phase II trial of the AIO pancreatic cancer group

BACKGROUND

Data on perioperative chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (rPDAC) are limited. NEONAX examined perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in rPDAC (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NEONAX is a prospective, randomized phase II trial with two independent experimental arms. One hundred twenty-seven rPDAC patients in 22 German centers were randomized 1 : 1 to perioperative (two pre-operative and four post-operative cycles, arm A) or adjuvant (six cycles, arm B) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population [R0/R1-resected patients who started neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) (A) or adjuvant CTX (B)]. The pre-defined DFS rate of 55% at 18 months was not reached in both arms [A: 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.5% to 48.1%), B: 41.4% (95% CI 20.7% to 62.0%)]. Ninety percent of patients in arm A completed neoadjuvant treatment, and 42% of patients in arm B started adjuvant chemotherapy. R0 resection rate was 88% (arm A) and 67% (arm B), respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) (ITT population) as a secondary endpoint was 25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7 months) in arm A and 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months) in the upfront surgery arm. This difference corresponds to a median DFS (mDFS) (ITT) of 11.5 months (95% CI 8.8-14.5 months) in arm A and 5.9 months (95% CI 3.6-11.5 months) in arm B. Treatment was safe and well tolerable in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint, DFS rate of 55% at 18 months (mITT population), was not reached in either arm of the trial and numerically favored the upfront surgery arm B. mOS (ITT population), a secondary endpoint, numerically favored the neoadjuvant arm A [25.5 months (95% CI 19.7-29.7months); arm B 16.7 months (95% CI 11.6-22.2 months)]. There was a difference in chemotherapy exposure with 90% of patients in arm A completing pre-operative chemotherapy and 58% of patients starting adjuvant chemotherapy in arm B. Neoadjuvant/perioperative treatment is a novel option for patients with resectable PDAC. However, the optimal treatment regimen has yet to be defined. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047513) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2013-005559-34).

Translational analysis and final efficacy of the AVETUX trial - Avelumab, cetuximab and FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has so far been limited to patients with microsatellite instability high tumors (MSI-H). Unfortunately, most mCRC patients suffer from non-immunogenic microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Therefore, new combinatorial strategies are urgently needed to enhance the immunogenicity of MSS tumors to finally increase the number of patients benefiting from ICB.

Methods

The AVETUX trial aimed to combine the PD-L1 antibody avelumab with the standard of care chemotherapy combination FOLFOX and the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. Furthermore, we performed a central radiological review of the pre- and on-treatment computed tomography scans to better define the individual response to treatment.

Results and Discussion

In total, 43 patients were treated of which 39 patients were confirmed as RAS/BRAF wildtype in central tissue review and finally response evaluated. A final progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.1 (range: 0.8 to 22.3 months) and a herein updated final overall survival (OS) of 32.9 months (range: 0.8 to 47.1 months) was reached. We observed a strong median depth of response of 67.5% tumor shrinkage and deepness of response correlated significantly with survival. On the other hand, early tumor shrinkage was not an indicator of better outcome at a cut-off of 20% (median values). In a next step, we correlated the individual best radiological response with potential ICB response biomarkers and found that the clonality and diversity, but not frequency of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), strongly correlated with response. In summary, we report the final overall survival of the AVETUX trial and propose T cell clonality and diversity as a potential marker to predict response to chemo-immunotherapy combinations in MSS mCRC by performing a central radiological review.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT03174405).

Efficacy of Ipilimumab vs FOLFOX in Combination With Nivolumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With Previously Untreated ERBB2-Positive Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: The AIO INTEGA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA), the addition of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors to chemotherapy has improved outcomes in selected patient populations.

Objective

To investigate the efficacy of trastuzumab and PD-1 inhibitors with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors or FOLFOX in first-line treatment of advanced ERBB2-positive EGA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This phase 2 multicenter, outpatient, randomized clinical trial with 2 experimental arms compared with historical control individually was conducted between March 2018 and May 2020 across 21 German sites. The reported results are based on a median follow-up of 14.3 months. Patients with previously untreated, metastatic ERBB2-positive (local immunohistochemistry score of 3+ or 2+/in situ hybridization amplification positive) EGA, adequate organ function, and eligibility for immunotherapy were included. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2021.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to trastuzumab and nivolumab (1 mg/kg × 4/240 mg for up to 12 months) in combination with mFOLFOX6 (FOLFOX arm) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg × 4 for up to 12 weeks) (ipilimumab arm).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was survival improvement with a targeted increase of the 12-month overall survival rate from 55% (trastuzumab/chemotherapy-ToGA regimen) to 70% in each arm.

Results

A total of 97 patients were enrolled, and 88 were randomized (18 women, 70 men; median [range] age, 61 [41-80] years). Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 in 54 patients (61%) and 1 in 34 patients (39%); 66 patients (75%) had EGA localized in the esophagogastric junction and 22 in the stomach (25%). Central post hoc biomarker analysis (84 patients) showed PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score of 1 or greater in 59 patients (72%) and 5 or greater in 46 patients (56%) and confirmed ERBB2 positivity in 76 patients. The observed overall survival rate at 12 months was 70% (95% CI, 54%-81%) with FOLFOX and 57% (95% CI, 41%-71%) with ipilimumab. Treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 29 and 15 patients in the FOLFOX arm and in 20 and 17 patients in the ipilimumab arm, respectively, with a higher incidence of autoimmune-related AEs in the ipilimumab arm and neuropathy in the FOLFOX arm. Liquid biopsy analyses showed strong correlation of early cell-free DNA increase with shorter progression-free and overall survival and emergence of truncating and epitope-loss ERBB2 resistance sequence variations with trastuzumab treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, trastuzumab, nivolumab, and FOLFOX showed favorable efficacy compared with historical data and trastuzumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab in ERBB2-positive EGA. The ipilimumab arm yielded similar OS compared with the ToGA regimen.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409848.

Pathologic response after induction chemo-immunotherapy with single or double immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Expansion cohorts of the CheckRad-CD8 trial

6064

Background: Targeting the immune checkpoint CTLA-4 in addition to PD-1/PD-L1 alone did not increase efficacy in HNSCC, whereas this has not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by pathologic response-based patient selection for chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy was efficient in locally advanced HNSCC (J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003747). The expansion cohorts of the CheckRad-CD8 trial studied safety and efficacy of induction chemo-immunotherapy with increased dose or without CTLA-4 inhibition. Methods: Patients with previously untreated stage III-IVB (AJCC 8th edition) HNSCC were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Induction chemo-immunotherapy of the main cohort (MC) consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Patients in expansion cohort 1 (EC1) received this combination with high dose tremelimumab 300mg fix dose d5 and patients in expansion cohort 2 (EC2) received no tremelimumab. In EC1 and EC2 prophylactic G-CSF was recommended. Patients with at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy entered chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy up to a total dose of 70Gy. The current analysis focuses on toxicity and pathologic response after induction chemo-immunotherapy. Results: Between Sep 2018 and Sep 2021, 80 patients were enrolled in the MC (one excluded), 20 in EC1 and 20 in EC2 (one excluded) subsequently. In the MC, EC1 and EC2 a total of 56%, 50%, 58% were stage IV and 29%, 30%, 26% had p16 positive oropharyngeal tumors. Baseline median intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density was 395/mm², 505/mm² and 763/mm² in MC, EC1 and EC2. After induction chemo-immunotherapy 41 (52%), 12 (60%) and 11 (58%) of the patients had pCR in the re-biopsy in MC, EC1 and EC2. Patients with residual tumor after induction therapy had a median intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density of 670/mm², 781/mm² and 1605/mm², which was a median increase by factor 3.0, 2.1 and 4.8 in the corresponding patients’ tissue samples. In the cohorts MC, EC1 and EC2 the overall rate of grade 3-4 adverse events per patient was 1.38, 1.35 and 0.58. The corresponding rate of non-hematologic adverse events per patient was 0.84, 0.95 and 0.37, respectively. Conclusions: Neither increase of tremelimumab dosage nor its omission did significantly affect pathologic response to induction chemo-immunotherapy with cisplatin/ docetaxel/ durvalumab. Non-hematologic toxicity was slightly increased for high dose tremelimumab and clearly decreased without tremelimumab. The role of concomitant administration of tremelimumab with radiotherapy cannot be assessed until the final study analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03426657.

Ramucirumab, avelumab, and paclitaxel (RAP) as second-line treatment in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma, a phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

4051

Background: Combination of ramucirumab and paclitaxel is a standard second line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) (RAINBOW trial, Wilke et al., 2014). We integrated the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab into this regimen aiming for synergistic efficacy. Methods: In a multicenter phase II trial (NCT03966118) pts with metastatic GEAC, after progression on platinum / fluoropyrimidine based palliative 1st-line, ECOG 0 or 1, were treated with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg (d1,15) + avelumab 10 mg/kg (d1,15) + paclitaxel 80 mg/m² (d1,8,15), q4w. Sample size calculation was based on a Simon 2-stage design with overall survival rate at 6 months as the primary endpoint (H0≤50%, H1≥65%). Results: 60 pts were enrolled, 59 were evaluable (ITT), median age 64.0 yrs (range 18-81), male 80%, female 20%, primary gastric 52%, GEJ 48%, histology intestinal 59.6%, diffuse 24.6%, mixed 15.8%. Previous treatment with platin/fluoropyrimidine 100%, previous taxanes 66%. At central pathology MSI-H 7%, PD-L1 CPS < 5: 54%; ≥5: 41%, NA 5%. Response by investigator (%) CR 3.4, PR 27.1, SD 49.2, PD 20.3; DCR 79.7%, independent radiology review will be presented. DOR: 8.2 mo (95%CI 6.7-9.7), PFS 5.4 mo (95%CI 4.2-6.6); 6-mo OS rate 71.2%; 12-mo OS rate 45.8%; med OS (ITT) 10.6 mo (95%CI 8.2-13.1), med OS CPS < 5: 9.4 mo (95%CI 7.2-11.2), CPS ≥5: 14.0 mo (95%CI 12.8-15.3), translational data (ct-DNA) will be analysed. Treatment was generally well tolerated and no unexpected toxicities occurred: Grade 3/4 AE above 5%: anemia 5%, leucopenia 12%, neutropenia 22%, diarrhea 5%, pain 10%, peripheral neuropathy 10%, hypertension 5%, non-neutropenic infection 5% including 1 CTC grade 5 due to an esophago-tracheal fistula. Conclusions: The med OS of 10.6 mo (in a population of 66% pretreated with taxanes) compares very favourably to 8.6 mo in the Western population RAINBOW trial (Shitara et al., 2016) and 7.6 mo in the RAMIRIS trial (Lorenzen et al., 2022). PD-L1 CPS≥ 5 seems to predict for an even better efficacy (med OS 14.0 mo). Second-line RAP is a very efficacious and well tolerated combination. Clinical trial information: NCT03966118.

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with or without prior docetaxel - results from the phase II RAMIRIS Study of the German Gastric Cancer Study Group at AIO

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab and paclitaxel is the standard second-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the efficacy and safety analyses of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab after the failure of a platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, investigator initiated, phase II trial randomised patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to either FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) (arm A) or paclitaxel plus RAM (arm B). The primary end-point was 6-month overall survival (OS) rate, with a proportion of ≥65% in arm A considered a positive signal for further investigation.

RESULTS

111 patients (65% of patients had prior docetaxel) were enrolled and 110 patients qualified for ITT population (arm A, 72; arm B, 38). The study did not meet the primary end-point for the comparison with historical control, as 6-month OS rate in the FOLFIRI plus RAM arm was 54% (95% CI 44-67). In between arm comparison, OS was similar (hazard ratio, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.62-1.52]), while objective response rates (ORRs) and PFS were numerically better in arm A versus arm B (HR for PFS 0.73; ORR, 22% versus 11%). These differences were largely attributed to favourable efficacy results for arm A in docetaxel-pretreated patients (HR, 0.49; ORR, 25% versus 8%). In the safety population (n = 106), grade 3-5 adverse events were similar between arms (arm A, 75%; arm B, 68%).

CONCLUSION

The RAMIRIS trial demonstrated feasibility of FOLFIRI plus RAM. While the study was formally negative, it provided a signal to further investigate this combination for the group of patients with previous docetaxel therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03081143.

Induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by CD8+ immune cell-based patient selection for chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The first aim of the trial is to study feasibility of combined programmed death protein ligand 1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibition concomitant to radiotherapy. In addition, efficacy of the entire treatment scheme consisting of induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy (RIT) after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection will be analyzed.

METHODS

Patients with stage III-IVB head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30 mg/m² days 1-3, docetaxel 75 mg/m² day 1, durvalumab 1500 mg fix dose day 5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fix dose day 5. Patients with increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the rebiopsy entered RIT up to a total dose of 70 Gy. Patients received further three cycles of durvalumab/tremelimumab followed by eight cycles of durvalumab mono (every 4 weeks). The intended treatment for patients not meeting these criteria was standard radiochemotherapy outside the trial. Primary endpoint was a feasibility rate of patients entering RIT to receive treatment until at least cycle 6 of immunotherapy of ≥80%.

RESULTS

Between September 2018 and May 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (one excluded). Out of these, 23 patients had human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Median follow-up was 17.2 months. After induction chemoimmunotherapy 41 patients had pCR and 31 had increased intratumoral CD8 +immune cells. Of 60 patients entering RIT (primary endpoint cohort), 10 experienced imiting toxic (mainly hepatitis) and four discontinued for other reasons, resulting in a feasibility rate of 82%. The RIT cohort (n=60) had a progression-free survival (PFS) rate at one and 2 years of 78% and 72%, respectively, and an overall survival rate at one and 2 years of 90% and 84%, respectively. Patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers had greater benefit from RIT with a 2-year PFS rate of 94% compared with 64% for HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancers and other locations. In the entire study cohort (n=79) the 2-year PFS rate was 68% (91% for HPV-positive oropharynx vs 59% for others). Toxicity grade 3-4 mainly consisted of dysphagia (53%), leukopenia (52%) and infections (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The trial met the primary endpoint feasibility of RIT. Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy-free RIT after intratumoral CD8 +immune cell-based patient selection has promising PFS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03426657). The trial was conducted as investigator-sponsored trial (IST).

Pazopanib with 5-FU and oxaliplatin as first line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: A randomized phase-II study-The PaFLO trial. A study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie AIO-STO-0510

VEGF inhibition in gastric cancer has a proven benefit in the second line setting. Pazopanib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, selectively inhibits VEGFR-1, -2 and -3, c-kit and PDGF-R resulting in inhibition of angiogenesis. This open-label randomized phase II trial (2:1) investigated the efficacy of combining pazopanib with FLO (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) vs FLO alone (internal control arm) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Eighty-seven patients were randomized and 78 patients were eligible and evaluable (PaFLO arm 51 patients, FLO arm 27 patients). The PFS rate at 6 months (primary endpoint) was 34% in the PaFLO arm vs 30% in the FLO arm. Comparing PaFLO with FLO median PFS was 4.66 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87-6.46) vs 4.47 months (95% CI 1.79-7.14) (95% CI, hazard ratio [HR] 0.96 (0.60-1.55), P = .882 [exploratory]); median OS was 10.19 months (95% CI 5.46-14.92) vs 7.33 months (95% CI 4.93-9.73), (95% CI HR 1.01 [0.62-1.65], P = .953, exploratory), disease control rate was 72% vs 59%. PaFLO was well tolerable, toxicities were slightly higher in the PaFLO arm. Major adverse events were loss of appetite, nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Adding pazopanib to chemotherapy shows signs of efficacy but no major improvement in this randomized phase 2 trial. The PFS at 6 months in both arms was lower than expected from the literature. Biomarkers identifying subgroups who benefit and novel combinations are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01503372.

Treatment breaks in first line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intermittent systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) may improve quality of life without compromising overall survival (OS). We aimed to use individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) from multiple randomised controlled trials evaluating intermittent strategies to inform clinical practice. We also aimed to validate whether thrombocytosis as a predictive biomarker identified patients with significantly reduced OS receiving a complete treatment break.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An IPDMA of intermittent strategy impact on survival was undertaken, including all relevant trials in which data were available. Intermittent strategies were classified into two groups: a planned stopping of all therapy ("treatment break strategy"; 6 trials; 2,907 patients) or to the same treatment omitting oxaliplatin ("maintenance strategy"; 3 trials; 1,271 patients). The primary analysis sample was of patients successfully completing induction therapy. Additionally, a pre-planned analysis of the predictive value of thrombocytosis on survival under a continuous versus an intermittent strategy was undertaken.

RESULTS

All trials had comparable inclusion criteria. The overall IPDMA of intermittent therapy versus continuous therapy demonstrated no detriment in OS (HR = 1.03 [95% CI 0.93-1.14]), whether from complete break (HR 1.04 [95% CI 0.87-1.26]) or maintenance strategies (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.87-1.13]). Thrombocytosis was confirmed as a marker of poor prognosis in aCRC, but did not predict for OS detriment from treatment break strategies (interaction HR = 0.97 [95% CI 0.66-1.40] compared to continuous therapy).

CONCLUSION

The highest levels of evidence from this IPDMA indicate no detriment in survival for patients receiving an intermittent therapy strategy, either for maintenance or complete break strategies. Although, thrombocytosis is confirmed as a marker of poor prognosis, it is not predictive of poor outcome for patients treated with intermittent therapy. An intermittent chemotherapy strategy can therefore be applied irrespective of baseline platelet count and does not result in inferior OS compared to continuous chemotherapy.

PD-L1 targeting and subclonal immune escape mediated by PD-L1 mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), immune checkpoint blockade is ineffective, and combinatorial approaches enhancing immunogenicity need exploration.

METHODS

We treated 43 patients with predominantly microsatellite stable RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC on a phase II trial combining chemotherapy with the epidermal growth factor receptor antibody cetuximab and the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody avelumab. We performed next-generation gene panel sequencing for mutational typing of tumors and liquid biopsy monitoring as well as digital droplet PCR to confirm individual mutations. Translational analyses included tissue immunohistochemistry, multispectral imaging and repertoire sequencing of tumor-infiltrating T cells. Detected PD-L1 mutations were mechanistically validated in CRISPR/Cas9-generated cell models using qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, flow cytometry, complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity by natural killer cell degranulation assay and LDH release assay as well as live cell imaging of T cell mediated tumor cell killing.

RESULTS

Circulating tumor DNA showed rapid clearance in the majority of patients mirroring a high rate of early tumor shrinkage. In 3 of 13 patients expressing the high-affinity Fcγ receptor 3a (FcγR3a), tumor subclones with PD-L1 mutations were selected that led to loss of tumor PD-L1 by nonsense-mediated RNA decay in PD-L1 K162fs and protein degradation in PD-L1 L88S. As a consequence, avelumab binding and antibody-dependent cytotoxicity were impaired, while T cell killing of these variant clones was increased. Interestingly, PD-L1 mutant subclones showed slow selection dynamics reversing on avelumab withdrawal and patients with such subclones had above-average treatment benefit. This suggested that the PD-L1 mutations mediated resistance to direct antitumor effects of avelumab, while at the same time loss of PD-L1 reduced biological fitness by enhanced T cell killing limiting subclonal expansion.

CONCLUSION

The addition of avelumab to standard treatment appeared feasible and safe. PD-L1 mutations mediate subclonal immune escape to avelumab in some patients with mCRC expressing high-affinity FcγR3a, which may be a subset experiencing most selective pressure. Future trials evaluating the addition of avelumab to standard treatment in MSS mCRC are warranted especially in this patient subpopulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03174405.

Primary results of the phase II CheckRad-CD8 trial: First-line treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with double checkpoint blockade and radiotherapy dependent on intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration

6007

Background: Inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is efficient in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Targeting the immune checkpoint CTLA-4 may be synergistic to radiotherapy. This trial studies feasibility and efficacy of combined PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade concomitant to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Methods: Patients with previously untreated stage III-IVB (AJCC 8th edition) HNSCC were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Patients with at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy (performed on d22-26) entered radio-immunotherapy (RIT) up to a total dose of 70Gy. Patients received further three cycles of durvalumab/tremelimumab (q4w, two concomitant and one subsequent) followed by eight cycles of durvalumab mono (q4w). Primary endpoint was a feasibility rate of patients entering RIT to receive treatment until at least cycle 6 of immunotherapy of ≥80% (i.e. dose limiting toxicity/DLT ≤20%; exclusion of patients with other reasons than DLT for treatment discontinuation; feasibility unacceptable if ≤65%). The calculated sample size was 57 patients to enter RIT. Main secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between Sep 2018 and Mai 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (one excluded). Median age was 60 years, 33 patients (42%) were current smokers, 43 patients (54%) had oropharyngeal tumors (53% p16 positive), 44 patients (56%) were stage IV. Median follow up was 12.5 months. After induction chemo-immunotherapy 41 patients had pCR and 31 an intratumoral CD8+ immune cell increase. Of 60 patients entering RIT (primary endpoint cohort), 10 received DLT and 4 discontinued for other reasons. The feasibility rate of the RIT cohort until cycle 6 was 82%, meeting the primary endpoint of ≥80% (95% confidence interval (CI), one-sided (lower boundary): 72%). The RIT cohort had a PFS rate at 1 year of 79% (CI 69-90%) and at 2 years of 73% (CI 61-87%) and an OS rate at 1 year of 89% (CI 81-98%) and at 2 years of 86% (CI 77-97%). The entire study cohort had a PFS rate at 1 year of 75% (CI 65-85%) and at 2 years of 68% (CI 58-81%) and an OS rate at 1 year of 86% (CI 78-95%) and at 2 years of 80% (CI 70-91%). Toxicity (treatment-related or un-related) ≥grade 3 appeared in 75 patients (95%) and mainly consisted of dysphagia (53%), leucopenia (48%) and infections (29%). DLT mainly consisted of hepatitis (10%). Conclusions: The trial met the primary endpoint feasibility. CD8+ T cell-based pathological patient selection after induction therapy identifies patients with promising PFS rates after chemotherapy-free RIT. Clinical trial information: nct03426657.

Bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of individual patients' data from 3 phase III studies

BACKGROUND

The real impact of bevacizumab maintenance as single agent in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unclear. SAKK-41/06 and PRODIGE-9 failed to demonstrate the non-inferiority and superiority of bevacizumab versus no maintenance, respectively, while AIO-KRK-0207 showed the non-inferiority of maintenance bevacizumab versus bevacizumab and fluoropyrimidines for time to strategy failure.

METHODS

Bibliography electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for English published clinical trials prospectively randomizing mCRC patients to receive bevacizumab maintenance or not after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Individual patients' data (IPD) were provided by investigators for all included trials. Primary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both from the start of induction and maintenance. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed.

RESULTS

Three phase III studies - PRODIGE-9, AIO-KRK-0207 and SAKK-41/06 - were included. Considering the different timing of randomization, IPD of patients not progressed during induction and starting maintenance phase entered the analysis. 909 patients were included, 457 (50%) received bevacizumab maintenance. Median PFS from induction start was 9.6 and 8.9 months in bevacizumab group versus no maintenance group, respectively (HR 0.78; 95%CI: 0.68-0.89; p < 0.0001). Subgroups analysis for PFS showed a significant interaction according for RAS status (p = 0.048), with a maintenance benefit limited to RAS wild-type patients. No difference in terms of OS was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the statistically significant PFS improvement for bevacizumab maintenance, the absolute benefit appears limited. Subgroup analysis shows a differential effect of bevacizumab maintenance in favor of RAS wild-type patients. Considering these results, maintenance therapy with fluoropyrimidine with or without bevacizumab remains the first option. Single agent bevacizumab maintenance can be considered in selected cases, such as cumulative toxicity or patient's refusal, in particular for RAS wild-type patients.

Serial Circulating Tumor DNA Mutational Status in Patients with KRAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer from the Phase 3 AIO KRK0207 Trial

BACKGROUND

We assessed the usefulness of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) pre- or post-treatment initiation for outcome prediction and treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Droplet digital PCR was used to measure absolute mutant V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene ((mut)KRAS) ctDNA concentrations in 214 healthy controls (plasma and sera) and in 151 tissue-based mutKRAS positive patients with mCRC from the prospective multicenter phase 3 trial AIO KRK0207. Serial mutKRAS ctDNA was analyzed prior to and 2-3 weeks after first-line chemotherapy initiation with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with mCRC and correlated with clinical parameters.

RESULTS

mut KRAS ctDNA was detected in 74.8% (113/151) of patients at baseline and in 59.6% (90/151) at follow-up. mutKRAS ctDNA at baseline and follow-up was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] =1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.95; HR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.47-3.15) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.44-4.46; HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.23-2.95), respectively. mutKRAS ctDNA clearance at follow-up conferred better disease control (P = 0.0075), better OS (log-rank P = 0.0018), and PFS (log-rank P = 0.0018). Measurable positive mutKRAS ctDNA at follow-up was the strongest and most significant independent prognostic factor on OS in multivariable analysis (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.40-3.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial analysis of circulating mutKRAS concentrations in mCRC has prognostic value. Post treatment mutKRAS concentrations 2 weeks after treatment initiation were associated with therapeutic response in multivariable analysis and may be an early response predictor in patients receiving first-line combination chemotherapy.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT00973609.

Safety and efficacy of single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel/ durvalumab/tremelimumab in locally advanced HNSCC: first results of CheckRad-CD8

Background

To determine safety and efficacy of single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel and durvalumab/tremelimumab in stage III-IVB head and neck cancer.

Methods

Patients received a single cycle of cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1–3 and docetaxel 75 mg/m² on day 1 combined with durvalumab 1500 mg fix dose on day 5 and tremelimumab 75 mg fix dose on day 5. Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) in the rebiopsy after induction treatment or at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ cell density in the rebiopsy compared with baseline entered radioimmunotherapy with concomitant durvalumab/tremelimumab. The objective of this interim analysis was to analyze safety and efficacy of the chemoimmunotherapy-induction treatment before radioimmunotherapy.

Results

A total of 57 patients were enrolled, 56 were treated. Median pretreatment intratumoral CD8+ cell density was 342 cells/mm². After induction treatment, 27 patients (48%) had a pCR in the rebiopsy and further 25 patients (45%) had a relevant increase of intratumoral CD8+ cells (median increase by a factor of 3.0). Adverse event (AE) grade 3–4 appeared in 38 patients (68%) and mainly consisted of leukopenia (43%) and infections (29%). Six patients (11%) developed grade 3–4 immune-related AE. Univariate analysis computed p16 positivity, programmed death ligand 1 immune cell area and intratumoral CD8+ cell density as predictors of pCR. On multivariable analysis, intratumoral CD8+ cell density predicted pCR independently (OR 1.0012 per cell/mm², 95% CI 1.0001 to 1.0022, p=0.016). In peripheral blood CD8+ cells, the coexpression of programmed death protein 1 significantly increased especially in patients with pCR.

Conclusions

Single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel and durvalumab/tremelimumab is feasible and achieves a high biopsy-proven pCR rate.

Ipilimumab or FOLFOX with Nivolumab and Trastuzumab in previously untreated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic EsophagoGastric Adenocarcinoma - the randomized phase 2 INTEGA trial (AIO STO 0217)

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) currently represents a main cause of cancer related death. Despite an intensified treatment for locally advanced or metastatic EGA with a doublet chemotherapy consisting of a platinum compound and a fluoropyrimidine in combination with trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease or in selected cases with docetaxel, survival remains poor. Recently, immune-oncology based strategies relevantly improved the treatment of different solid tumors and showed some promise in late or later stage trials in EGA. Notably, the combination of immunotherapy with trastuzumab to enhance anti-tumor immunity through activation of innate and adaptive immunity was beneficial in preclinical studies or clinical studies in breast cancer.

METHODS

The INTEGA study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, exploratory phase II trial designed to assess clinical performance, safety and tolerability of ipilimumab or 5-FU/folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic EGA. The primary objective is to determine the clinical performance of ipilimumab or FOLFOX in combination with nivolumab and trastuzumab in terms of overall survival. Secondary objectives are safety and tolerability, efficacy in terms of progression-free survival and objective response rate and blood-based signatures (e.g. immune response or suppression of anti-HER2 resistance) that may correlate with treatment response.

DISCUSSION

Recent evidence from the phase II NCT02954536 study (oxaliplatin, capecitabine, trastuzumab and pembrolizumab) suggests the clinical feasibility of combining chemotherapy, trastuzumab and checkpoint inhibition in EGA. However, evidence for a chemotherapy-free regimen is also mounting in HER2-positive disease (NCT02689284) i.e. margetuximab and Pembrolizumab. Both studies excelled with high overall response rates and manageable toxicities. The INTEGA study aims to comparatively assess these results and select a promising new 1st line regimen which then needs to be confirmed in a randomized phase III trial. Further, the translational part of the study might help to better stratify patients and tailor treatment of either arm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03409848 24.01.2018.

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with or without prior docetaxel: Results from the phase II RAMIRIS Study of the AIO

4514

Background: Ramucirumab (Ram) as monotherapy or plus paclitaxel is a proven second-line option for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). More and more patients (pts) are pretreated with docetaxel in the perioperative or first-line setting. These pts may benefit more from another, non-cross resistant chemotherapy backbone regimen. This trial evaluates the addition of Ram to FOLFIRI as second line treatment. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, investigator initiated, phase II trial. Pts with GEA who have progressed after treatment with a fluoropyrimidine/platinum-containing regimen were randomized 2:1 to either FOLFIRI plus Ram every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel (days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle) plus Ram every two weeks (Arm B). Major endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Results: 111 pts (median age 61 years, 65% of pts had prior docetaxel therapy) were enrolled and 110 analyzed within intention to treat population (ITT, Arm A, 72; Arm B, 38). In the ITT, there was no significant difference in median OS (A, 6.8 vs. B, 7.6 months, HR 0.94, p = 0.77) and median PFS (A, 4.6 vs. B, 3.6 months, HR 0.72, p = 0.12). For pts with prior docetaxel use (71/110), median PFS was A, 4.3 vs. B, 2.0 months, HR 0.49, p = 0.008 and median OS was A, 7.5 vs. B, 6.4 months, HR 0.71, p = 0.25. In 101 pts with tumor assessment and included in the response analysis, ORR and DCR was 23% and 65% in Arm A and 11% and 60% in Arm B, respectively. 67 pts assessable for response were pre-treated with docetaxel. In these pts, ORR was 24% in Arm A and 9% in Arm B. Disease control rate (DCR) was 67% and 41% for Arm A and B respectively. Both therapies were similarly tolerable, final safety results will be shown. Conclusions: The RAMIRIS trial demonstrated feasibility of the combination of FOLFIRI and Ram. With a response rate of 24% and a median PFS of 4.3 months, docetaxel pre-treated pts seemed to derive pronounced benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, providing a rationale for a phase III trial, which is currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03081143 .

A multicenter phase II trial of the combination cisplatin/ docetaxel/durvalumab/tremelimumab as single-cycle induction treatment in locally advanced HNSCC (CheckRad-CD8 trial)

6519

Background: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are efficient in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Combination with anti-CTLA4 agents may enhance anti-tumor activity compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in different tumor types. In the CheckRad-CD8 trial the typical induction treatment consisting of Cisplatin/Docetaxel was combined with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab. Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy after induction treatment or at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8 density in the re-biopsy compared to baseline entered radioimmunotherapy with concomitant Durvalumab/Tremelimumab. Methods: In this prospective multicenter phase II trial, patients with HNSCC stage III-IVB received a single cycle of Cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, Docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, Durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and Tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Objectives of this interim analysis were to quantify the effect of the induction treatment on intratumoral CD8 density and the pCR rate and to generate safety data. Results: Between Sep 2018 and Dec 2019, 57 patients were enrolled. Median age was 59 years, 22 patients (37%) were current smokers, 27 patients (47%) had oropharyngeal tumors (52% p16 positive). The median pre-treatment intratumoral CD8 density was 335 CD8+ cells/mm². After induction treatment 27 patients (47%) had a pCR in the re-biopsy and further 25 patients (44%) had a relevant increase of intratumoral CD8+ cells (median increase by factor 3.0). Response according to RECIST criteria was CR in 1 (2%), PR in 19 (33%) and SD in 20 patients (35%) (17 patients not evaluable). Adverse events (AE) grade 3-4 appeared in 39 patients (68%) and mainly consisted of leucopenia (43%) and infections (28%). 6 patients (11%) developed grade 3-4 immune-related AEs. In multivariable analysis the intratumoral CD8 density was the only independently significant predictor of pCR (odds ratio 1.0013 per cell/mm², 95%-CI 1.00023-1.0023, p=0.017). 42 patients (74%) continued with Durvalumab/ Tremelimumab concomitant to radiotherapy. Conclusions: Single cycle induction treatment with Cisplatin/Docetaxel/Durvalumab/Tremelimumab is feasible and achieves a high pCR rate. CD8 density may have a predictive role for further treatment planning in locally advanced HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03426657 .

Multiple Myeloma Incidence and Mortality Around the Globe; Interrelations Between Health Access and Quality, Economic Resources, and Patient Empowerment

BACKGROUND

The interrelation between the worldwide incidence, mortality, and survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and relevant factors such as Health Care Access and Quality (HAQ) index, gross domestic product (GDP), health care expenditures, access to cancer drugs, and patient empowerment has not been addressed before.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Epidemiologic data were obtained from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The mortality-to-incidence ratio (expressed as 1-MIR) was used as proxy for 5-year survival. Information on health expenditure was obtained from Bloomberg Health-Care Efficacy ranking, the HAQ Index was used as a measure of available health care. For patient empowerment, visits to the Web site of the International Myeloma Foundation were used as proxy. Data on GDP and population per country were assessed from the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations Population Division, respectively. Possible associations were analyzed using Spearman's rank-order correlation.

RESULTS

The worldwide incidence of MM is currently 160,000, and mortality is 106,000. Age-standardized myeloma incidence varies between 0.54 and 5.3 per 100,000 and correlates with 1-MIR, patient empowerment, HAQ Index, and access to cancer drugs. The 1-MIR varies between 9% and 64% and is closely related to myeloma incidence, HAQ Index, patient empowerment, access to cancer drugs, and health care expenditures.

CONCLUSION

The global incidence and outcome of MM shows significant disparities, indicating under-recognition and suboptimal treatment in many parts of the globe. Results also highlight the importance of economic resources, access to and quality of health care, and patient education for improving diagnosis and survival of patients with MM.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Multiple myeloma accounts for 10% of all hematological malignancies and has moved to the forefront of clinical interest because of the significant advances in medical treatment. Diagnosis depends on laboratory tests, imaging, and professional expertise, particularly in patients without a significant M-component. The present data show a substantial worldwide variation in incidence and mortality, that is mainly due (apart from variations due to ethnicity and lifestyle) to disparities in access to and quality of health care, a parameter strongly related to the economic development of individual countries. Improvement of quality of care and, consequently, in outcome is associated with patient empowerment.

A randomized phase II trial comparing switch to nivolumab with TKI continuation after 12 weeks of TKI induction therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients (NIVOSWITCH)

678

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and Nivolumab (NIVO) are standard treatment options for mRCC. We tested whether TKI followed by early switch to NIVO improved outcome in mRCC patients (pts). Methods: Main inclusion criteria: measurable advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate organ function, PR or SD to induction therapy with sunitinib (50 mg, 4-2 regime) or pazopanib (800 mg OD). 1:1 randomization at 12 wks.: TKI continuation vs. switch to NIVO (240 or 480 mg IV q2-4wks). Strata were MSKCC risk, TKI used and response to TKI. Imaging was performed q12w. 49 of 244 planned pts were randomized between Dec 2016 and Aug 2018, which led to premature closure of the trial. We report the second interim analysis with data base lock on 31.07.19. ORR was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed in ITT and safety population, respectively. Log-Rank analyses were used for survival analyses. Results: 25 and 24 pts received NIVO or TKI, respectively. Median age was 65 y (range: 35-79), 82% were male and 4% had ECOG PS 2. Metastases occurred predominantly in lung (47%), lymph nodes (27%) and liver (24%). MSKCC risks were: favorable (31%), intermediate (65%), and poor (4%), which were balanced between arms. 55% received sunitinib. ORR for NIVO vs. TKI differed when assessed from start of induction therapy (64 vs. 70%, P=0.76) or from time of randomization (16 vs. 48%; P=0.032). Accordingly, PFS from randomization was 3.0 vs. 11.9 mo. (HR = 1.72 [95% CI: 1.19 – 2.48]; P=0.0026) in favor of TKI continuation. At a median follow-up of 12.9 mo. median OS was not reached, but HR = 1.86 (95% CI: 0.85 – 4.07) P=0.10 showed a trend for TKI continuation. All grades AE for NIVO vs. TKI occurred in 96% vs. 100%, grade 3-5 48% vs. 71% and serious AE 40% vs. 46%. Conclusions: In TKI-sensitive pts, continuation of TKI is more efficacious than early switch to NIVO. The major limitation of our trial is the premature closure and its limited sample size. Clinical trial information: NCT02959554.

Avelumab and cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Final results of the phase II AVETUX trial (AIO-KRK-0216)

96

Background: Single agent PD-1/L1 inhibition is efficacious in MCRC patients (pts) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). For the vast majority of MCRC pts with MS stable (MSS) phenotype the role of immunotherapy remains undetermined. Methods: The single arm phase II AVETUX trial combined mFOLFOX6 and cetuximab with avelumab (10mg/kg day 1 from cycle 2 onwards) in RAS/BRAF wildtype (local lab) MCRC pts. Primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), tolerability, overall survival and translational research evaluating tissue including PD-L1 expression (tumour/immune cells) and serial ctDNA. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat (ITT). Results: Overall 43 pts were enrolled. Median age was 61 (range 29-82), 14 pts (33%) were female and 39 (91%) left sided. 30 pts (70%) had liver mets and 17 (40%) liver mets only. 2 pts were MSI-H, one MSI-low and 40 MSS. Besides immediate and otherwise unexplained fever in 4 pts treatment was well tolerated and avelumab was not associated with unexpected adverse events to standard FOLFOX/cetuximab. Central tissue review found 4 pts to be ineligible due to low frequent KRAS or BRAF mutation (15-31%). Thus, ITT included 39 pts. The ORR was 79.5%, including 6 complete (CR) and 25 partial responses (PR). Further 5 stable diseases were noted, thus disease control rate was 92.3%; 2 pts had progression and 1 was not evaluable. Early tumor shrinkage (ETS) rate (≥20% after 8 weeks) was 79.5% (1 CR, 27 PR and 3 SD with ≥20% - < 30%). In MSI-H pts 1 PR and 1 SD and in the 3 low RAS mut pts 2 PR were noted. Panel sequencing was feasible with 153 mutations detected, showing an immediate ctDNA drop within 4 weeks of treatment, mirroring the high rate of early tumor response. Notably, the 4 pts with fever had a high T cell infiltration in the tumor. Final data including the primary endpoint and translational data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The AVETUX regimen was feasible producing a high rate of responses in MSS pts mainly occurring within the first 8 weeks. The noted ORR/ETS of 79.5% warrants further evaluation in a randomized trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03174405.

Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population

This trial evaluated quality of life (QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 instruments in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during induction and maintenance therapy with eight cycles of ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, followed by 12 months of ixazomib maintenance therapy. When patient's baseline QoL was compared with data of the general population, a significant impairment in health-related QoL, physical, role, and social functioning and several other dimensions, as well as more pain and fatigue, was noted. Induction therapy resulted in significant improvement of pain and worsening of neuropathy, with no significant variation of other parameters. During maintenance treatment, scores for most dimensions including health-related QoL, physical functioning and pain, improved, while for neuropathy no improvement was observed. Time to deterioration (≥10 score points) of health-related QoL, physical functioning, pain, and neuropathy was distinctly shorter than time to progression. Health-related QoL and physical functioning at baseline correlated with overall survival.

Bevacizumab (BV) maintenance (M) after first-line chemotherapy (CT) plus BV for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): A meta-analysis of individual pts data (IPD) from three phase III studies

3550

Background: Although CAIRO3 and AIO KRK 0207 trials demonstrated the benefit of BV + fluoropyrimidine as a M regimen after induction CT + BV, the role of BV alone is not clear. Indeed, SAKK 41/06 and PRODIGE 9 trials failed to demonstrate the superiority of BV alone vs no M, while AIO KRK 0207 showed the non-inferiority of BV alone vs combo M. Thus, in order to evaluate the magnitude of the eventual benefit of M with BV alone vs no M, an IPD meta-analysis was performed. Methods: Trials whereas mCRC pts were prospectively randomized to receive BV M or not were considered eligible. Primary end-points were PFS and OS, both from the start of induction and M. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS were performed, with the following variables: baseline ECOG PS; age ( > vs ≤ 65 years); RAS and BRAF status; LDH and CEA baseline level; RR (PR or CR vs SD) during induction; induction CT (oxa- vs iri-based); resected primary tumor; primary tumor side; synchronous vs metachronous; adjuvant treatment; number (N) of metastatic sites; liver-only disease. Results: IPD of 1,064 pts enrolled in the PRODIGE 9, AIO KRK 0207 and SAKK 41/06 trials were collected. Considering the different timing of randomization in PRODIGE 9 (at the start of induction) vs AIO KRK 0207 and SAKK 41/06 (at the start of M), IPD of pts not progressed during induction and starting M phase entered the analysis. 909 pts were included, 457 (50%) received BV M. Median PFS from induction start was 9.6 and 8.9 months in BV group vs no M group, respectively (HR 0.78; 95%CI: 0.68-0.89; p < 0.0001). At the multivariate PFS analysis, BV M, resected primary tumor, N of metastatic sites and liver-only disease were significant. No difference in terms of OS between the 2 groups was observed. Conclusions: This is the first IPD meta-analysis investigating the role of BV alone M vs no M after first-line induction CT+BV in mCRC pts. Despite the significant PFS improvement in favor of BV M, the absolute benefit appears limited, and without a clear clinical relevance. On these bases, a predictive nomogram to identify pts most likely to benefit from BV M is under evaluation and will be presented during the Congress.

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction as second-line therapy: Interim safety and efficacy results from the phase II RAMIRIS Study (AIO-STO-0415) of the German Gastric Group at AIO

4023

Background: Ramucirumab as monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel is a proven second-line option for advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). More and more patients (pts) are pretreated with docetaxel in the perioperative or first-line setting. For those pts, the benefit of a combination of ramucirumab and paclitaxel is unclear, and physicians would choose an irinotecan-based regimen as second line treatment. This provides a rationale for the evaluation of FOLFIRI + ramucirumab. Methods: This is a multicenter, randomized, investigator initiated, phase II trial, planned to include 111 pts with advanced GEA to receive 2:1 either FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel (days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle) plus ramucirumab every two weeks (Arm B). Primary endpoint is 6-months OS rate. This abstract displays interim results of safety and overall objective response (ORR) in docetaxel pre-treated group from up to 65 randomized pts. The results were needed to decide on conducting a subsequent phase III study. Results: 58 (A, 36; B, 22) pts were included in the safety analysis and 50 pts with tumor assessment in the response analysis. Main ≥ grade 3 adverse events were respectively in arms A/B: neutropenia (20%/22%), fatigue (6%/0%), diarrhea (8%/3%), and related SAEs (14% v 23%). Twenty-nine of 50 pts (58%) were pre-treated with docetaxel. In these pts, ORR was 30% in Arm A (5/17) and 8% (1/12) in Arm B. Disease control rate (DCR) was 65% and 50% for Arm A and B respectively. Conclusions: The interim safety analysis of the RAMIRIS trial has demonstrated feasibility of the combination of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab. Docetaxel pre-treated pts had higher ORR and DCR when ramucirumab is combined with FOLFIRI, instead of paclitaxel. EudraCT: 2015-005171-24. Clinical trial information: NCT03081143.

RAP: A phase II trial with ramucirumab, avelumab, and paclitaxel as second line treatment in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma of the arbeitsgemeinschaft internistische onkologie (AIO)

TPS4148

Background: Combination of ramucirumab and paclitaxel resembles the standard treatment option in second line therapy with improvement of response rate and overall survival (REGARD, RAINBOW). Response rates to PD-1/L1 blockade in gastro-esophageal cancer patients rank within 10–20%, whereby PD-1/L1 blockade is reported to impressively extend survival rates in responders. Trials investigating either the synergistic effect of anti-angiogenesis and anti-PD-L1 or chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-L1 are promising. Based on these data we hypothesize benefit from combining immunotherapy by checkpoint inhibition with VEGF-directed treatment and chemotherapy induced increase of immunogenicity of tumor cells. This study investigates the incorporation of PD-L1 blockade by avelumab in the second line setting by combination with the actual best second-line chemotherapy regimen in metastatic gastric cancer patients (paclitaxel+ramucirumab). Methods: The RAP trial (AIO-STO-0218, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov) is a single arm multicenter phase II trial. A total of 59 patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma, ECOG 0–1, who progressed after having received first-line therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet with or without anthracycline, docetaxel or trastuzumab within the last six months will receive avelumab and ramucirumab on day 1, 15 and paclitaxel on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression (RECIST v1.1), intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or at a maximum treatment of 1 year. The primary endpoint is the overall survival rate (OSR) at 6 months. Sample size calculation is based on a Simon 2-stage design with a one-sided alpha error of 10% and a power of 80%, an expected OSR at 6 months of ≥ 65% and a 0 hypothesis ≤ 50%. Secondary endpoints include OS, OSR at 12 months, PFS, safety and tolerability, duration of response. Ethics commission approved the study protocol in January 2019. Updated patient accrual will be presented. Clinical trial information: AIO-STO-0218.

Ten-year results of intense dose-dense chemotherapy show superior survival compared with a conventional schedule in high-risk primary breast cancer: final results of AGO phase III iddEPC trial

Background

Primary breast cancer (BC) patients with extensive axillary lymph-node involvement have a limited prognosis. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) trial compared intense dose-dense (idd) adjuvant chemotherapy with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk BC patients. Here we report the final, 10-year follow-up analysis.

Patients and methods

Enrolment took place between December 1998 and April 2003. A total of 1284 patients with 4 or more involved axillary lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive 3 courses each of idd sequential epirubicin, paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (iddEPC) q2w or standard epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC → P) q3w. Event-free survival (EFS) was the primary end point.

Results

A total of 658 patients were assigned to receive iddEPC and 626 patients were assigned to receive EC → P. The median duration of follow-up was 122 months. EFS was 47% (95% CI 43% to 52%) in the standard group and 56% (95% CI 52% to 60%) in the iddEPC group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87; log-rank P = 0.00014, one-sided]. This benefit was independent of menopausal, hormone receptor or HER2 status. Ten-year overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI 55% to 63%) for patients in the standard group and 69% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for patients in the iddEPC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.87; log-rank P = 0.0007, two-sided). Nine versus two cases of secondary myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome were observed in the iddEPC and the EC → P arm, respectively.

Conclusion

The previously reported OS benefit of iddEPC in comparison to conventionally dosed EC → P has been further increased and achieved an absolute difference of 10% after 10 years of follow-up.

Trastuzumab without chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: subgroup results from a large observational study

Background

The topic of trastuzumab therapy without chemotherapy in early breast cancer (EBC) has been repeatedly discussed at international consensus meetings, but is compromised by the lack of solid evidence from clinical studies.

Methods

An observational study database of patients with EBC receiving trastuzumab-containing (neo)adjuvant therapy was screened to identify those patients who did not receive cytostatic agents.

Results

Of 3935 patients, 232 (6%) were identified who received no chemotherapy, being characterized by older age, worse performance status, and/or less aggressive histology. Relapse-free survival in this cohort was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78–89%) at 3 years and 80% (95% CI 74–87%) at 5 years. However, these rates were significantly worse than those in the group of patients who received chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.06–2.09; P = 0.022). A similar pattern was observed for overall survival, with marginally non-significant inferiority in the group receiving no chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1.56; 95% CI 1.00–2.44; P = 0.052). Survival rates in patients receiving no chemotherapy were 93% (95% CI 88–97%) and 87% (95% CI 81–93%) at 3 and 5 years, respectively. These findings were confirmed by a propensity score analysis accounting for selection bias.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy should remain the preferred option in all patients with HER2-positive EBC with an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, a limited proportion of patients will need an alternative treatment approach, either because of contraindications or the patient’s preference. In these selected patients, trastuzumab monotherapy, eventually combined with endocrine agents, might be a reasonable option offering favorable long-term outcomes by addressing the high-risk profile associated with HER2-positive disease.

Clinicopathological factors influencing outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment vs observation: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two phase 3 trials

Background:

The CAIRO3 and AIO 0207 trials demonstrated the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab (FP+Bev) maintenance treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. In this individual patient data meta-analysis with updated follow-up, we aim to provide more precise estimates of treatment effects and to identify subgroups that benefit most from maintenance treatment or observation.

Methods:

In 871 patients, randomised to FP+Bev maintenance treatment or observation, we investigated whether treatment effect was modified by sex, age, performance status, response to induction treatment, primary tumour location, number of metastatic sites, disease stage and primary tumour resection, serum LDH, platelet count, CEA, and RAS/BRAF mutation status. Primary end point was time to second progression after reintroduction of the induction regimen (PFS2). Secondary end points were first progression-free survival (PFS1) and overall survival (OS).

Results:

At a median follow-up of 68.5 months (IQR 54.6–87.0 months), maintenance treatment was more effective compared with observation in PFS1 (HR 0.40(95% CI 0.34–0.47)) and PFS2 (HR 0.70(0.60–0.81)). No subgroups were identified that did not benefit from maintenance treatment in PFS1 and PFS2; no clinically relevant subgroup effects were observed. Regarding OS, pooled results were not significant (HR 0.91(0.78–1.05)), and the trials showed marked heterogeneity in overall treatment effect and subgroup effects.

Conclusions:

FP+Bev maintenance treatment is effective in all patients, regardless of the investigated subgroups.

Is the addition of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist beneficial in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy?-a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK1RAs) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) excluding anthracycline-cyclophosphamide-based regimens.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed and OVID) and Central databases, plus major oncology conferences, identified randomized trials evaluating NK1RAs in combination with a 5-HT₃ RA plus a glucocorticoid for management of CINV. Efficacy endpoints were complete response (CR), no emesis and no nausea rates. Data were analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials (3848 patients) were identified. Results were separately analyzed for (a) pure MEC regimens (excluding regimens containing carboplatin or oxaliplatin), (b) carboplatin-based regimens, and (c) oxaliplatin-based regimens. (a) Two trials (abstracts) enrolled 715 patients. The odds ratio for overall CR with the addition of an NK1-RA was 1.46 (95% 1.06-2.02; p = 0.02) with an absolute risk difference (RD) of 8%. (b) Nine trials (1790 patients) were identified. The OR for achieving an overall CR was 1.96 (95% CI 1.57-2.45; p < 0.00001) in favor of the NK1RA containing regimen with an RD of 15%. (c) Three trials (1190 patients) were identified. The OR for achieving an overall CR was 1.34 (95% CI 0.88-2.04; p = 0.17) not reaching statistical significance with a RD of 4%.

CONCLUSION

Clear clinically significant benefit was seen with the addition of NK1RAs in carboplatin-based chemotherapy. A global benefit of an NK1RA containing regimen for the whole MEC category cannot be attested yet and warrants more randomized trials exclusively testing pure MEC regimens without carboplatin.

Dose-escalation study evaluating pegylated interferon alpha-2a in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

This open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous pegylated (40 kD) interferon α-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PEG-IFN α-2a was administered subcutaneously at 180 (n = 4), 270 (n = 6), or 360 μg (n = 3) once weekly for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).

RESULTS

PEG-IFN α-2a was generally well tolerated, with a moderate number of reductions or withholding of doses because of adverse events (AEs) (25% (n = 1), 66% (n = 4), and 0% (n = 0) in the 180-, 270-, and 360-μg/week groups, respectively). The only dose-limiting toxicity was a grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes in the 270-μg dose group. The most common AEs were fatigue, acute flu-like symptoms, and hepatic toxicity. The major response rate (CR or PR) was 50% in the 180-μg group (CR, 50%; PR, 0%), 83% in the 270-μg group (CR, 67%; PR, 17%), and 66% in the 360-μg group (CR, 33%; PR, 33%).

CONCLUSION

PEG-IFN α-2a at doses up to 360 μg once weekly was well tolerated in patients with CTCL up to the highest dose group and showed good response rates. Due to their good tolerance even in high doses, they might be an option for patients not tolerating standard IFN-α preparations. However, for this purpose and to evaluate comparability between standard and PEG-IFN larger clinical trials are needed, alone and in combination with oral photochemotherapy (PUVA).

An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of the impact of thrombocytosis (?plts) on overall survival (OS) whilst using an intermittent chemotherapy (iCTx) strategy in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC)

e15044

Background: iCTx in pts with aCRC offers potential for improvement in QoL. The COIN trial is the largest study to compare iCTx v. continuous strategies in aCRC, a pre-specified subgroup analysis of 16 baseline factors was undertaken among pts with stable or responding disease after 3 mths of first-line therapy to see if the relative treatment effect differed by subgroup. Baseline ⇡plts alone identified a group of pts with significantly worse OS when an iCTx strategy was applied. Here we seek to validate this finding in other intermittent strategy trials. Methods: Published RCTs of iCTx in aCRC were identified via literature review. Eligible trials could allow one or more re-introductions of “full” initial regimen either upon progression or after a set period of time. Outcome and platelet data were requested and collated into a central database. The COIN trial was declared the discovery dataset and other eligible trials the validating datasets. Two co-primary hypotheses were agreed based upon the COIN trial results: Hypothesis 1: In pts with baseline ⇡plts, any planned complete stop of all therapyis detrimental to OS when compared to any maintenance strategy. Hypothesis 2: In pts with baseline ⇡plts, any planned stop of oxaliplatin(Ox) therapy is detrimental to OS when compared to any equivalent strategy where Ox is maintained. Unadjusted IPD meta-analysis was performed according to a pre-specified statistical plan. Results: All trials had broadly similar inclusion criteria . Incidence of ⇡plts range 17-32%. ⇡plts was a poor prognostic marker. Combining IPD from all trials, iCTx was not detrimental to OS. Hypothesis 1 included AIO-0207, CAIRO3, COIN B, OPTIMOX 2 and GISCAD with 1622 pts, HR for interaction of ⇡plts with treatment strategy 0.97 (0.66-1.40), p = 0.78. Hypothesis 2 included TTD MACRO, NORDIC VII and OPTIMOX I, with 1268 pts, HR for interaction 1.36 (0.71-2.62), p = 0.18. Conclusions: These IPD meta-analyses do not validate COIN trial findings that showed reduced OS in pts with baseline ⇡plts who are given a planned treatment break. Sensitivity analyses will be presented, including impact of RAS mut status.

Gene-signature based prediction of relapse-free survival in melanoma patients with known sentinel lymph node status

e21037

Background: Staging of cutaneous melanoma (CM), as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), includes determination of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status as a major prognostic factor. We have previously identified and validated a gene expression risk score (GRS) in primary CM and adjacent stroma, consisting of 7 protective genes and 1 risk-associated gene, which predicts patient survival, independently of AJCC stage. This external validation study evaluated single and combined performance of GRS and SLN in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS). Methods: The study cohort included 203 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) -primary CMs (AJCC stages IA-IIIC, n=31 RFS events). Tissue samples and clinical data were provided by two centers, and gene expression was determined externally using real-time RT-PCR (double-blind study). External prospective data analysis followed a pre-specified protocol. Results: Integration Discrimination Improvement (IDI) analysis demonstrated non-inferiority of GRS vs. SLN status in predicting RFS (IDI estimate=-0.8%, p=0.040). In univariate Cox regression analysis, GRS and SLN status predicted RFS (GRS: p=0.011, HR=2.44 [1.2-4.95]; SLN: p=0.038, HR=2.12 [1.03-4.38]). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated independent contribution of prognostic information by both parameters (GRS: p=0.015, HR=2.40 [1.18-4.89]; SLN: p=0.046, HR=2.11 [1.02-4.37]. IDI analysis demonstrated that combining GRS and SLN status improved prognostic performance, as compared to SLN status alone (IDI estimate=3.2%, p=0.044). When complementing SLN status with GRS (SLN positive or high GRS), sensitivity of relapse detection increased from 38.7% for SLN alone to 67.7%. Conclusions: GRS is a non-invasive predictor of RFS, complementary to SLN analysis. Combining GRS and SLN status significantly improves accuracy of melanoma prognosis and, therefore, may guide follow-up care as well as treatment decisions regarding new adjuvant therapies, e.g. of SLN positive patients with high GRS. [Table: see text]

Avelumab and cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): The phase II AVETUX-CRC trial (AIO KRK 0216)

TPS3620

Background: Inhibition of the PD-1/L1 axis has shown to improve survival as single agent in a variety of tumor types. The efficacy of single agent PD-1/L1 inhibition in patients with treatment refractory MCRC seems to be limited to hypermutated tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency. 1st line chemotherapy (e.g. FOLFOX) with cetuximab for patients with RAS/BRAF wildtype MCRC result in objective response rates of about 60%, thus substantial antigen release will likely occur triggering immune control. Furthermore, the induction of immunogenic cell death has been recently shown for cetuximab-based regimen. Thus, the evaluation of FOLFOX and cetuximab in combination with avelumab in 1st line MCRC is of particular interest. Methods: AVETUX is a single arm exploratory phase II investigator initiated trial. Patients with RAS/BRAF wildtype MCRC will be included independent of mismatch repair status to receive mFOLFOX6 and cetuximab in combination with avelumab (10mg/kg from day 1 of cycle 2 onwards). Treatment with avelumab is limited to a maximum of 18 months. Primary endpoint is 12month progression-free survival rate, which should be increased from 40% to 57%, with type I error of 10% and 80% power, leading to a sample size of 43 patients. An early stopping rule will be applied in case of an increase in toxicity after the first 15 patients received at least two months of treatment. The trial is flanked by a large translational program including immunoprofiling to determine and correlate the respective immune response signatures with clonal dynamics (RAS/EGFR). Recruitment will start in 11 German sites early 2017. Clinical trial information: EudraCT No 2016-004434-26. Conclusion: The AVETUX trial will determine the feasibility and early efficacy of FOLFOX and cetuximab combined with avelumab in 1st line MCRC. The translational research program will shed light on the potential mode of action of this novel combination. Clinical trial information: 2016-004434-26.

Localization of the primary tumor (LPT) and maintenance strategies after first line oxaliplatin (Ox), fluoropyrimidine (FP), and bevacizumab (Bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from the AIO 0207 trial

3543

Background: Numerous trials have examined the prognostic and predictive value of the LPT in mCRC, but little is known about the predictive value of LPT on different maintenance strategies. We analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from start of maintenance according to LPT in patients (pts) from the AIO KRK 0207 trial. Methods: Following a 24-week standard induction 471 pts were randomized to FP/Bev, Bev mono or no treatment with 454 pts being evaluable for PFS. Right sided primary tumors were defined as located in the caecum, ascending colon, transverse colon up to the splenic flexure; left colon was defined as splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon and rectum. Results: Data on LPT was available in 414 pts. for PFS (91%). LPT was left sided (LPTl) in 291 (70%) and right-sided (LPTr) in 123 (30%) of pts, respectively (remaining pts: status was either unknown, n = 37 or LPT was located in both regions, n = 3). Median PFS1 was 3.9 months (mos.) for LPTr and 5.3 mos. for LPTl (p = 0.11; HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.96 - 1.48). Analyses on PFS did not demonstrate a major predictive impact of LPT on the efficacy of the three maintenance strategies. The pairwise comparison of treatment arms showed a better PFS for FP/Bev vs no treatment independent from LPT (left: p < 0.0001; HR = 2.39, 95%CI 1.73-3.31; right: p = 0.011; HR 1.78, 95%CI 1.14-2.80). In addition, Bev mono vs no treatment was superior in LPTl (p = 0.0032; HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.15-2.06) with less difference in LPTr (p = 0.17; HR 1.36, 95%CI 0.87-2.14). Analysis for OS (429 evaluable pts) confirmed the strong prognostic impact of LPT (left vs right: 24.0 vs 16.7 months; p < 0.0001; HR = 1.65, 95%CI 1.32 - 2.06), but without major interaction between LPT and maintenance arms. The impact related to RAS mutational status will be reported. Conclusions: The strong prognostic factor of the LPT is confirmed in pts with mCRC undergoing Ox/FP/Bev induction therapy while there seems to be no major predictive impact of LPT on different maintenance strategies. Clinical trial information: EudraCT-Nr: 2008-007974-39.

Trastuzumab in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective, Noninterventional Study on Routine Treatment Between 2006 and 2012 in Germany

PURPOSE

Trastuzumab is part of the standard treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer in addition to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. This German prospective noninterventional study, which included major patient cohorts underrepresented in the pivotal randomized studies, examined the generalizability of the results of those studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2012, 4,027 patients were enrolled and treated with trastuzumab; they were unselected regarding age or concomitant/sequential adjuvant chemotherapy. Long-term outcome data were obtained in yearly intervals. All analyses were descriptive in nature.

RESULTS

Among 3,940 evaluable patients, 26% were elderly (older than 65 years of age). More than half of the population had pN0 tumor stage. Ninety-four percent received chemotherapy: 78% as adjuvant treatment and 14% as neoadjuvant treatment, 2% both. Anthracyclines were administered in 87% and taxanes in 66%. Trastuzumab was stopped prematurely in 9% (because of cardiotoxicity in 3.5%). Recurrence-free survival was 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.9%-91.1%) and 82.8% (95% CI, 81.2%-84.4%) after 3 and 5 years, respectively. The corresponding figures for overall survival were 96.8% (95% CI, 96.1%-97.6%) and 90.0% (95% CI, 88.6%-91.4%). Pathological primary tumor size, lymph node involvement, and hormone receptor status had the greatest independent effect on recurrence risk. Cardiac function toxicity of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade ≥2 and ≥3 was observed in 2.5% and less than 1% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The maturing follow-up data seem to confirm the beneficial results of trastuzumab treatment for early breast cancer from the randomized studies. Moreover, these findings support use of trastuzumab-based therapy in patients groups less commonly included in the phase III trials (e.g., elderly patients and those with stage I disease). The Oncologist 2017;22:131-138Implications for Practice: On the basis of the results of large pivotal phase III studies, the inclusion of trastuzumab in adjuvant treatment regimens for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer is standard of care. However, in these trials, elderly patients, those with comorbidities, and/or those with contraindications or refusal of cytotoxic chemotherapy are typically underrepresented. This study provides data on observed treatment options, outcomes, and risks in a wider, unselected patient population (including more than 1,000 patients with stage I disease), treated routinely in several institutions of varying size and location across Germany.