Whole Breast Irradiation in Comparison to Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer-A Direct and Network Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Multiple randomized trials have established adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) as the standard approach after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early-stage breast cancer. The omission of WBI has been studied in multiple trials and resulted in reduced local control with maintained survival rates and has therefore been adapted as a treatment option in selected patients in several guidelines. Omitting ET instead of WBI might also be a valuable option as both treatments have distinctly different side effect profiles. However, the clinical outcomes of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI have not been formally analyzed.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI in low-risk breast cancer patients with publication dates after 2000. We excluded trials using any form of chemotherapy, regional nodal radiation and mastectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using a two-step process. First, we extracted all available published event rates and the effect sizes for overall and breast-cancer-specific survival (OS, BCSS), local (LR) and regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free interval, contralateral breast cancer, second cancer other than breast cancer and mastectomy-free interval as investigated endpoints and compared them in a network meta-analysis. Second, the published individual patient data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) publications were used to allow a comparison of OS and BCSS.

RESULTS

We identified three studies, including a direct comparison of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI (n = 1059) and nine studies randomizing overall 7207 patients additionally to BCS only and BCS + WBI + ET resulting in a four-arm comparison. In the network analysis, LR was significantly lower in the BCS + WBI group in comparison with the BCS + ET group (HR = 0.62; CI-95%: 0.42-0.92; p = 0.019). We did not find any differences in OS (HR = 0.93; CI-95%: 0.53-1.62; p = 0.785) and BCSS (OR = 1.04; CI-95%: 0.45-2.41; p = 0.928). Further, we found a lower distant metastasis-free interval, a higher rate of contralateral breast cancer and a reduced mastectomy-free interval in the BCS + WBI-arm. Using the EBCTCG data, OS and BCSS were not significantly different between BCS + ET and BCS + WBI after 10 years (OS: OR = 0.85; CI-95%: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.369) (BCSS: OR = 0.72; CI-95%: 0.38-1.36; p = 0.305).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from direct and indirect comparison suggests that BCS + WBI might be an equivalent de-escalation strategy to BCS + ET in low-risk breast cancer. Adverse events and quality of life measures have to be further compared between these approaches.

Prognostic markers for the clinical course in the blood of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection

BACKGROUND

The presentation of peptides and the subsequent immune response depend on the MHC characteristics and influence the specificity of the immune response. Several studies have found an association between HLA variants and differential COVID-19 outcomes and have shown that HLA genotypes are associated with differential immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, particularly in severely ill patients. Information, whether HLA haplotypes are associated with the severity or length of the disease in moderately diseased individuals is absent.

METHODS

Next-generation sequencing-based HLA typing was performed in 303 female and 231 male non-hospitalized North Rhine Westphalian patients infected with SARS-CoV2 during the first and second wave. For HLA-Class I, we obtained results from 528 patients, and for HLA-Class II from 531. In those patients, who became ill between March 2020 and January 2021, the 22 most common HLA-Class I (HLA-A, -B, -C) or HLA-Class II (HLA -DRB1/3/4, -DQA1, -DQB1) haplotypes were determined. The identified HLA haplotypes as well as the presence of a CCR5Δ32 mutation and number of O and A blood group alleles were associated to disease severity and duration of the disease.

RESULTS

The influence of the HLA haplotypes on disease severity and duration was more pronounced than the influence of age, sex, or ABO blood group. These associations were sex dependent. The presence of mutated CCR5 resulted in a longer recovery period in males.

CONCLUSION

The existence of certain HLA haplotypes is associated with more severe disease.

Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

This retrospective analysis reports on the treatment outcomes of women diagnosed with high-risk breast cancer treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy before the surgical removal of the tumor. It is well established that the lack of visible tumor cells in the pathological tumors analysis by the time of surgery (known as pathological complete response, pCR) is a factor that improves survival without the tumor reappearing in the body. However, it is unknown whether that is only true when giving systemic therapy or when pCR is achieved with the help of radiotherapy. We collected patient information and survival times to analyze the outcome in our patient group. We found that women with a pCR treated with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy can expect favorable long-term survival. This was true across different types of breast cancer and chemotherapy substances.

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed. Results: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41–0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.

Acute cardiac side effects after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series

BACKGROUND

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been the main tool to contain the pandemic. The rush development of the 3 vaccines and their expedited approval have led to inoculation of millions of patients around the world, leading to a containment of the disease. Despite continuous viral mutations and the identification of weaker variants, the severity of the infections has been mild, with many patients being either asymptomatic or recovering at home. Currently the focus has shifted from the host of organ damage related to the infection to potential side effects of the vaccine. Myocarditis has been reported as one of the potential side effects from the mRNA vaccine, affecting young healthy individuals. Up to September 30, 2021, 1.243 cases of myocarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 Comirnaty© were registered in young adults by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute in Germany alone. The exact pathophysiology and the risk factors for myocarditis following vaccination remain unclear. We present a case series of eight patients with cardiac symptom shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b6, Biontech, Comirnaty© or mRNA-1237 Moderna, Spikevax©).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight patients between 13 and 56 years of age, vaccinated with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine between January and August 2021 developed cardiac side effects shortly after either their first or second dose of the vaccine. Clinical data were retrieved from the clinical information system and analyzed. To support diagnosis of myocarditis or pericarditis, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed shortly after the onset of symptoms, with further investigations in severe cases. Symptoms were defined as dyspnea, chest pain and cardiac arrhythmia as determined by electrocardiography.

RESULTS

Eight patients (5 males and 3 females) developed cardiac symptoms compatible with myocarditis, according to the CDC criteria, shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Three patients (2 males, 1 female) required hospitalization due to severe chest pain and elevated troponin levels. All patients recovered fully within 7 days from the symptom onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that cardiac adverse events such as myocarditis or pericarditis shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination are rare but possible and occur particularly in male patients.

Pathologic response after induction chemo-immunotherapy with single or double immune checkpoint inhibition in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Expansion cohorts of the CheckRad-CD8 trial

6064

Background: Targeting the immune checkpoint CTLA-4 in addition to PD-1/PD-L1 alone did not increase efficacy in HNSCC, whereas this has not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by pathologic response-based patient selection for chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy was efficient in locally advanced HNSCC (J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jan;10(1):e003747). The expansion cohorts of the CheckRad-CD8 trial studied safety and efficacy of induction chemo-immunotherapy with increased dose or without CTLA-4 inhibition. Methods: Patients with previously untreated stage III-IVB (AJCC 8th edition) HNSCC were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Induction chemo-immunotherapy of the main cohort (MC) consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Patients in expansion cohort 1 (EC1) received this combination with high dose tremelimumab 300mg fix dose d5 and patients in expansion cohort 2 (EC2) received no tremelimumab. In EC1 and EC2 prophylactic G-CSF was recommended. Patients with at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy entered chemotherapy-free radioimmunotherapy up to a total dose of 70Gy. The current analysis focuses on toxicity and pathologic response after induction chemo-immunotherapy. Results: Between Sep 2018 and Sep 2021, 80 patients were enrolled in the MC (one excluded), 20 in EC1 and 20 in EC2 (one excluded) subsequently. In the MC, EC1 and EC2 a total of 56%, 50%, 58% were stage IV and 29%, 30%, 26% had p16 positive oropharyngeal tumors. Baseline median intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density was 395/mm², 505/mm² and 763/mm² in MC, EC1 and EC2. After induction chemo-immunotherapy 41 (52%), 12 (60%) and 11 (58%) of the patients had pCR in the re-biopsy in MC, EC1 and EC2. Patients with residual tumor after induction therapy had a median intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density of 670/mm², 781/mm² and 1605/mm², which was a median increase by factor 3.0, 2.1 and 4.8 in the corresponding patients’ tissue samples. In the cohorts MC, EC1 and EC2 the overall rate of grade 3-4 adverse events per patient was 1.38, 1.35 and 0.58. The corresponding rate of non-hematologic adverse events per patient was 0.84, 0.95 and 0.37, respectively. Conclusions: Neither increase of tremelimumab dosage nor its omission did significantly affect pathologic response to induction chemo-immunotherapy with cisplatin/ docetaxel/ durvalumab. Non-hematologic toxicity was slightly increased for high dose tremelimumab and clearly decreased without tremelimumab. The role of concomitant administration of tremelimumab with radiotherapy cannot be assessed until the final study analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT03426657.

F18-FDG PET/CT imaging early predicts pathologic complete response to induction chemoimmunotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: preliminary single-center analysis of the checkrad-cd8 trial

Aim

In the CheckRad-CD8 trial patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer are treated with a single cycle of induction chemo-immunotherapy (ICIT). Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy enter radioimmunotherapy. Our goal was to study the value of F-18-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of pCR after induction therapy.

Methods

Patients treated within the CheckRad-CD8 trial that additionally received FDG- PET/CT imaging at the following two time points were included: 3–14 days before (pre-ICIT) and 21–28 days after (post-ICIT) receiving ICIT. Tracer uptake in primary tumors (PT) and suspicious cervical lymph nodes (LN +) was measured using different quantitative parameters on EANM Research Ltd (EARL) accredited PET reconstructions. In addition, mean FDG uptake levels in lymphatic and hematopoietic organs were examined. Percent decrease (Δ) in FDG uptake was calculated for all parameters. Biopsy of the PT post-ICIT acquired after FDG-PET/CT served as reference. The cohort was divided in patients with pCR and residual tumor (ReTu).

Results

Thirty-one patients were included. In ROC analysis, ΔSUVmax PT performed best (AUC = 0.89) in predicting pCR (n = 17), with a decline of at least 60% (sensitivity, 0.77; specificity, 0.93). Residual SUVmax PT post-ICIT performed best in predicting ReTu (n = 14), at a cutpoint of 6.0 (AUC = 0.91; sensitivity, 0.86; specificity, 0.88). Combining two quantitative parameters (ΔSUVmax ≥ 50% and SUVmax PT post-ICIT ≤ 6.0) conferred a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.93 for determining pCR. Background activity in lymphatic organs or uptake in suspected cervical lymph node metastases lacked significant predictive value.

Conclusion

FDG-PET/CT can identify patients with pCR after ICIT via residual FDG uptake levels in primary tumors and the related changes compared to baseline. FDG-uptake in LN + had no predictive value.

Trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03426657.

Comparison of Different Systemic Therapeutic Regimes in Resectable Soft-Tissue Sarcoma-Results of a Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

This analysis was conducted to compare different systemic treatment options in the therapy of localized and resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. We tested these in a network against the current standard of resection with or without radiotherapy, which allowed direct and indirect comparisons. Chemotherapy given after the local therapy and chemotherapy added to regional hyperthermia before the operation were associated with a longer survival and likeliness of being disease free and alive. Chemotherapy tailored to the specific subtype of sarcoma did not improve outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy might be more helpful in male rather than female patients.

Abstract

Background: The standard treatment of high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma consists of surgical resection followed by risk-adapted radiation therapy. Further treatment options that may improve local and systemic tumor control, including chemotherapy, are not well established. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, different systemic approaches as well as their application at different time points have been attempted. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials in the treatment of localized, resectable high-risk adult soft-tissue sarcoma comparing different treatment modalities according to the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted published hazard ratios and number of events for the endpoints overall and disease-free survival (OS; DFS) as well as local and distant recurrence-free interval (LRFI; DRFI). The different modalities were compared in a network meta-analysis against the defined standard treatment surgery ± radiotherapy using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Results: The literature search identified 25 trials including 3453 patients. Five different treatment modalities were compared in the network meta-analysis. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS compared to surgery ± radiotherapy alone (HR = 0.86; CI-95%: 0.75–0.97; p = 0.017). Likewise, neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with regional hyperthermia (naCTx + HTx) also led to superior OS (HR = 0.45; CI-95%: 0.20–1.00; p = 0.049). Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (naCTx) and perioperative chemotherapy (periCTx) did not improve OS (HR = 0.61; CI-95%: 0.29–1.29; p = 0.195 and HR = 0.66; CI-95%: 0.30–1.48; p = 0.317, respectively). Histology-tailored chemotherapy (htCTx) also did not improve survival compared to surgery ± radiotherapy (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.45–2.61; p = 0.868). The network analysis of DFS, LRFI, and DRFI revealed a similar pattern between the different treatment regimens. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS, LRFI, and DRFI compared to surgery ± radiotherapy. In direct comparison, this advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy was restricted to male patients (HR = 0.78; CI-95%: 0.65–0.92; p = 0.004) with no effect for female patients (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.90–1.29; p = 0.410). Conclusions: Standardized chemotherapy in high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma appears to be of added value irrespective of timing. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be restricted to male patients. The addition of regional hyperthermia to neodjuvant chemotherapy achieved the best effect sizes and might warrant further investigation.

Association of HLA genotypes, AB0 blood type and chemokine receptor 5 mutant CD195 with the clinical course of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

COVID-19, the pandemic disease caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2, may take highly variable clinical courses, ranging from symptom-free and pauci-symptomatic to fatal disease. The goal of the current study was to assess the association of COVID-19 clinical courses controlled by patients' adaptive immune responses without progression to severe disease with patients' Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genetics, AB0 blood group antigens, and the presence or absence of near-loss-of-function delta 32 deletion mutant of the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5).

PATIENT AND METHODS

An exploratory observational study including 157 adult COVID-19 convalescent patients was performed with a median follow-up of 250 days. The impact of different HLA genotypes, AB0 blood group antigens, and the CCR5 mutant CD195 were investigated for their role in the clinical course of COVID-19. In addition, this study addressed levels of severity and morbidity of COVID-19. The association of the immunogenetic background parameters were further related to patients' humoral antiviral immune response patterns by longitudinal observation.

RESULTS

Univariate HLA analyses identified putatively protective HLA alleles (HLA class II DRB1*01:01 and HLA class I B*35:01, with a trend for DRB1*03:01). They were associated with reduced durations of disease instead decreased (rather than increased) total anti-S IgG levels. They had a higher virus neutralizing capacity compared to non-carriers. Conversely, analyses also identified HLA alleles (HLA class II DQB1*03:02 und HLA class I B*15:01) not associated with such benefit in the patient cohort of this study. Hierarchical testing by Cox regression analyses confirmed the significance of the protective effect of the HLA alleles identified (when assessed in composite) in terms of disease duration, whereas AB0 blood group antigen heterozygosity was found to be significantly associated with disease severity (rather than duration) in our cohort. A suggestive association of a heterozygous CCR5 delta 32 mutation status with prolonged disease duration was implied by univariate analyses but could not be confirmed by hierarchical multivariate testing.

CONCLUSION

The current study shows that the presence of HLA class II DRB1*01:01 and HLA class I B*35:01 is of even stronger association with reduced disease duration in mild and moderate COVID-19 than age or any other potential risk factor assessed. Prospective studies in larger patient populations also including novel SARS-CoV-2 variants will be required to assess the impact of HLA genetics on the capacity of mounting protective vaccination responses in the future.

Delayed skin reaction after mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a rare clinical reaction

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is associated with a wide clinical spectrum of skin manifestations, including urticarial, vesicular, vasculitic and chilblain‐like lesions. Recently, delayed skin reactions have been reported in 1% individuals following mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. The exact pathophysiology and the risk factors still remain unclear.

Patients and methods

6821 employees and patients were vaccinated at our institutions between February and June 2021. Every patient received two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in our hospitals, and reported back in case of any side effects which were collected in our hospital managed database.

Results

Eleven of 6821 vaccinated patients (0.16%) developed delayed skin reactions after either the first or second dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Eight of 11 patients (73%) developed a rash after the first dose, while in 3/11 (27%), the rash occurred after the second dose. More females (9/11) were affected. Four of 11 patients required antihistamines, with two needing additional topical steroids. All the cutaneous manifestations resolved within 14 days. None of the skin reactions after the first dose of the vaccine prevented the administration of the second dose. There were no long-term cutaneous sequelae in any of the affected individuals.

Conclusion

Our data suggests that skin reactions after the use of mRNA-1273 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 are possible, but rare. Further studies need to be done to understand the pathophysiology of these lesions.

Informed consent and informed intervention: SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations not just call for disclosure of newly emerging safety data but also for hypothesis generation and testing

Background

COVID-19 infection is a major threat to patients and health care providers around the world. One solution is the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive query of the latest publications on the prevention of viral infections including the recent vaccination program and its side effects.

Results

The situation is evolving rapidly and there is no reasonable alternative to population-scale vaccination programs as currently enrolled.

Conclusion

Therefore, regulatory authorities should consider supplementing their conventional mandate of post-approval pharmacovigilance, which is based on the collection, assessment, and regulatory response to emerging safety findings.

Comparing Local and Systemic Control between Partial- and Whole-Breast Radiotherapy in Low-Risk Breast Cancer-A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE

The standard treatment for localized low-risk breast cancer is breast-conserving surgery, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and appropriate systemic therapy. As the majority of local recurrences occur at the site of the primary tumor, numerous trials have investigated partial-breast irradiation (PBI) instead of whole-breast treatment (WBI) using a multitude of irradiation techniques and fractionation regimens. This meta-analysis addresses the impact on disease-specific endpoints, such as local and regional control, as well as disease-free survival of PBI compared to that of WBI in published randomized trials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review and searched for randomized trials comparing WBI and PBI in early-stage breast cancer with publication dates after 2009. The meta-analysis was based on the published event rates and the effect sizes for available oncological endpoints of at least two trials reporting on them. We evaluated in-breast tumor recurrences (IBTR), local recurrences at the primary site and elsewhere in the ipsilateral breast, regional recurrences (RR), distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI), disease-free survival (DFS), contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and second primary cancer (SPC). Furthermore, we aimed to assess the impact of different PBI techniques and subgroups on IBTR. We performed all statistical analyses using the inverse variance heterogeneity model to pool effect sizes.

RESULTS

For the intended meta-analysis, we identified 13 trials (overall 15,561 patients) randomizing between PBI and WBI. IBTR was significantly higher after PBI (OR = 1.66; CI-95%: 1.07-2.58; p = 0.024) with an absolute difference of 1.35%. We detected significant heterogeneity in the analysis of the PBI technique with intraoperative radiotherapy resulting in higher local relapse rates (OR = 3.67; CI-95%: 2.28-5.90; p < 0.001). Other PBI techniques did not show differences to WBI in IBTR. Both strategies were equally effective at the primary tumor site, but PBI resulted in statistically more IBTRs elsewhere in the ipsilateral breast. IBTRs after WBI were more likely to be located at the primary tumor bed, whereas they appeared equally distributed within the breast after PBI. RR was also more frequent after PBI (OR = 1.75; CI-95%: 1.07-2.88; p < 0.001), yet we did not detect any differences in DMFI (OR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.89-1.30; p = 0.475). DFS was significantly longer in patients treated with WBI (OR = 1.14; CI-95%: 1.02-1.27; p = 0.003). CBC and SPC were not different in the test groups (OR = 0.81; CI-95%: 0.65-1.01; p = 0.067 and OR = 1.09; CI-95%: 0.85-1.40; p = 0.481, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Limiting the target volume to partial-breast radiotherapy appears to be appropriate when selecting patients with a low risk for local and regional recurrences and using a suitable technique.

Primary results of the phase II CheckRad-CD8 trial: First-line treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with double checkpoint blockade and radiotherapy dependent on intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration

6007

Background: Inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is efficient in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Targeting the immune checkpoint CTLA-4 may be synergistic to radiotherapy. This trial studies feasibility and efficacy of combined PD-L1/CTLA-4 blockade concomitant to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Methods: Patients with previously untreated stage III-IVB (AJCC 8th edition) HNSCC were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. Treatment consisted of a single cycle of cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Patients with at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8+ immune cell density or pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy (performed on d22-26) entered radio-immunotherapy (RIT) up to a total dose of 70Gy. Patients received further three cycles of durvalumab/tremelimumab (q4w, two concomitant and one subsequent) followed by eight cycles of durvalumab mono (q4w). Primary endpoint was a feasibility rate of patients entering RIT to receive treatment until at least cycle 6 of immunotherapy of ≥80% (i.e. dose limiting toxicity/DLT ≤20%; exclusion of patients with other reasons than DLT for treatment discontinuation; feasibility unacceptable if ≤65%). The calculated sample size was 57 patients to enter RIT. Main secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Between Sep 2018 and Mai 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (one excluded). Median age was 60 years, 33 patients (42%) were current smokers, 43 patients (54%) had oropharyngeal tumors (53% p16 positive), 44 patients (56%) were stage IV. Median follow up was 12.5 months. After induction chemo-immunotherapy 41 patients had pCR and 31 an intratumoral CD8+ immune cell increase. Of 60 patients entering RIT (primary endpoint cohort), 10 received DLT and 4 discontinued for other reasons. The feasibility rate of the RIT cohort until cycle 6 was 82%, meeting the primary endpoint of ≥80% (95% confidence interval (CI), one-sided (lower boundary): 72%). The RIT cohort had a PFS rate at 1 year of 79% (CI 69-90%) and at 2 years of 73% (CI 61-87%) and an OS rate at 1 year of 89% (CI 81-98%) and at 2 years of 86% (CI 77-97%). The entire study cohort had a PFS rate at 1 year of 75% (CI 65-85%) and at 2 years of 68% (CI 58-81%) and an OS rate at 1 year of 86% (CI 78-95%) and at 2 years of 80% (CI 70-91%). Toxicity (treatment-related or un-related) ≥grade 3 appeared in 75 patients (95%) and mainly consisted of dysphagia (53%), leucopenia (48%) and infections (29%). DLT mainly consisted of hepatitis (10%). Conclusions: The trial met the primary endpoint feasibility. CD8+ T cell-based pathological patient selection after induction therapy identifies patients with promising PFS rates after chemotherapy-free RIT. Clinical trial information: nct03426657.

Measures of infection prevention and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Germany, Austria and Switzerland

Purpose

COVID-19 infection has manifested as a major threat to both patients and healthcare providers around the world. Radiation oncology institutions (ROI) deliver a major component of cancer treatment, with protocols that might span over several weeks, with the result of increasing susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and presenting with a more severe clinical course when compared with the general population. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate the impact of ROI protocols and performance on daily practice in the high-risk cancer patients during this pandemic.

Methods

We addressed the incidence of positive COVID-19 cases in both patients and health care workers (HCW), in addition to the protective measures adopted in ROIs in Germany, Austria and Switzerland using a specific questionnaire.

Results

The results of the questionnaire showed that a noteworthy number of ROIs were able to complete treatment in SARS-CoV‑2 positive cancer patients, with only a short interruption. The ROIs reported a significant decrease in patient volume that was not impacted by the circumambient disease incidence, the type of ROI or the occurrence of positive cases. Of the ROIs 16.5% also reported infected HCWs. About half of the ROIs (50.5%) adopted a screening program for patients whereas only 23.3% also screened their HCWs. The range of protective measures included the creation of working groups, instituting home office work and protection with face masks.

Regarding the therapeutic options offered, curative procedures were performed with either unchanged or moderately decreased schedules, whereas palliative or benign radiotherapy procedures were more often shortened. Most ROIs postponed or cancelled radiation treatment for benign indications (88.1%). The occurrence of SARS-CoV‑2 infections did not affect the treatment options for curative procedures. Non-university-based ROIs seemed to be more willing to change their treatment options for curative and palliative cases than university-based ROIs.

Conclusion

Most ROIs reported a deep impact of SARS-CoV‑2 infections on their work routine. Modification and prioritization of treatment regimens and the application of protective measures preserved a well-functioning radiation oncology service and patient care.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-020-01681-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Face masks: benefits and risks during the COVID-19 crisis

Background

The German government has made it mandatory to wear respiratory masks covering mouth and nose (MNC) as an effective strategy to fight SARS-CoV-2 infections. In many countries, this directive has been extended on shopping malls or public transportation. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the statutory regulation to wear protective masks during the COVID-19 crisis from a medical standpoint.

Methods

We performed an extensive query of the most recent publications addressing the prevention of viral infections including the use of face masks in the community as a method to prevent the spread of the infection. We addressed the issues of practicability, professional use, and acceptability based on the community and the environment where the user resided.

Results

Upon our critical review of the available literature, we found only weak evidence for wearing a face mask as an efficient hygienic tool to prevent the spread of a viral infection. However, the use of MNC seems to be linked to relevant protection during close contact scenarios by limiting pathogen-containing aerosol and liquid droplet dissemination. Importantly, we found evidence for significant respiratory compromise in patients with severe obstructive pulmonary disease, secondary to the development of hypercapnia. This could also happen in patients with lung infections, with or without SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusion

Epidemiologists currently emphasize that wearing MNC will effectively interrupt airborne infections in the community. The government and the politicians have followed these recommendations and used them to both advise and, in some cases, mandate the general population to wear MNC in public locations. Overall, the results seem to suggest that there are some clinically relevant scenarios where the use of MNC necessitates more defined recommendations. Our critical evaluation of the literature both highlights the protective effects of certain types of face masks in defined risk groups, and emphasizes their potential risks.

A multicenter phase II trial of the combination cisplatin/ docetaxel/durvalumab/tremelimumab as single-cycle induction treatment in locally advanced HNSCC (CheckRad-CD8 trial)

6519

Background: PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are efficient in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Combination with anti-CTLA4 agents may enhance anti-tumor activity compared to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in different tumor types. In the CheckRad-CD8 trial the typical induction treatment consisting of Cisplatin/Docetaxel was combined with Durvalumab/Tremelimumab. Patients with pathological complete response (pCR) in the re-biopsy after induction treatment or at least 20% increase of intratumoral CD8 density in the re-biopsy compared to baseline entered radioimmunotherapy with concomitant Durvalumab/Tremelimumab. Methods: In this prospective multicenter phase II trial, patients with HNSCC stage III-IVB received a single cycle of Cisplatin 30mg/m² d1-3, Docetaxel 75mg/m² d1, Durvalumab 1500mg fix dose d5 and Tremelimumab 75mg fix dose d5. Objectives of this interim analysis were to quantify the effect of the induction treatment on intratumoral CD8 density and the pCR rate and to generate safety data. Results: Between Sep 2018 and Dec 2019, 57 patients were enrolled. Median age was 59 years, 22 patients (37%) were current smokers, 27 patients (47%) had oropharyngeal tumors (52% p16 positive). The median pre-treatment intratumoral CD8 density was 335 CD8+ cells/mm². After induction treatment 27 patients (47%) had a pCR in the re-biopsy and further 25 patients (44%) had a relevant increase of intratumoral CD8+ cells (median increase by factor 3.0). Response according to RECIST criteria was CR in 1 (2%), PR in 19 (33%) and SD in 20 patients (35%) (17 patients not evaluable). Adverse events (AE) grade 3-4 appeared in 39 patients (68%) and mainly consisted of leucopenia (43%) and infections (28%). 6 patients (11%) developed grade 3-4 immune-related AEs. In multivariable analysis the intratumoral CD8 density was the only independently significant predictor of pCR (odds ratio 1.0013 per cell/mm², 95%-CI 1.00023-1.0023, p=0.017). 42 patients (74%) continued with Durvalumab/ Tremelimumab concomitant to radiotherapy. Conclusions: Single cycle induction treatment with Cisplatin/Docetaxel/Durvalumab/Tremelimumab is feasible and achieves a high pCR rate. CD8 density may have a predictive role for further treatment planning in locally advanced HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03426657 .

Comparison of different systemic therapeutic regimes in resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcoma: Results of a network meta-analysis

11549

Background: The treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of the trunk or the extremities consists of surgical resection with risk-adapted radiation therapy. Further treatment options which can significantly improve local and systemic tumor control including chemotherapy are not well established. Due to the heterogeneity of disease different systemic approaches as well as their application during different time points have been attempted. Methods: We conducted a literature search for randomized clinical trials in the treatment of localized, resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcoma comparing different treatment modalities according to the PRISMA guidelines. We extracted published hazard ratios and number of events for the endpoints of overall and disease-free survival (OS; DFS) as well as local and distant recurrence-free interval (LRFI; DRFI). The different modalities were compared in a network meta-analysis against the defined standard treatment surgery ± radiotherapy using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model (ivhet) with the help of the Microsoft Excel add-in Meta-XL V5.3. Results: The literature search identified 25 studies including 3489 patients. The network analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy (adjCTx) results in a significant improvement in overall survival (HR = 0.86; CI-95%: 0.75-0.97; p = 0.017) compared to the standard treatment of surgery ± radiatherapy alone. Combined treatment with regional hyperthermia and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HTx+nadjCTx) also improves OS (HR = 0.45; CI-95%: 0.20-1.00; p = 0.049). Preoperative chemotherapy alone (nadjCTx) as well as perioperative chemotherapy (periopCTx) resulted both in non-statistically significant improvements in OS (HR = 0.61; CI-95%: 0.29-1.29; p = 0.195) and (HR = 0.48; CI-95%: 0.15-1.55; p = 0.218). Histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tNaCTx) also showed no effect on overall survival (HR = 1.08; CI-95%: 0.45-2.61; p = 0.868). The analysis of DFS, LRFI and DRFI disclosed a similar pattern between the different treatment regimens. Conclusions: The addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy in resectable high-risk soft tissue sarcomas provides a measurable benefit in overall survival. Shifting of systemic therapy to the neoadjuvant setting and combination with regional hyperthermia might be favored. Predictive clinical and molecular markers are needed to evaluate and limit potentional risks prospectively going forward.

The role of passive immunization in the age of SARS-CoV-2: an update

The rapid spread of the corona virus pandemic is an existential problem for many people in numerous countries. So far, there is no effective vaccine protection or proven therapy available against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In this review, we describe the role of passive immunization in times of the corona virus. Passive immunization could be a bridging technology to improve the immune defense of critically ill patients until better approaches with effective medications are available.

Which target volume should be considered when irradiating the regional nodes in breast cancer? Results of a network-meta-analysis

Purpose/objective(s)

Radiation treatment to the regional nodes results in an improvement in survival in breast cancer according to a meta-analysis of randomized trials. However, different volumes were targeted in these studies: breast or chestwall only (WBI/CWI), inclusion of the medial supraclavicular region and axillary apex (MS + WBI/CWI) or additional inclusion of the internal mammary chain (IM + MS + WBI/CWI). The benefit of treating the medial supraclavicular region and axillary apex compared to tangential breast or chestwall irradiation only remains unclear.

Materials/methods

A literature search was conducted identifying trials for adjuvant radiation volumes in nodal irradiation after breast surgery and axillary treatment. Events and effect sizes were extracted from the publications for the endpoints of overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and loco-regional control (LRC). A network meta-analysis was performed using MetaXL V5.3 with the inverse variance heterogeneity model.

Results

We found two randomized studies (n = 5836) comparing comprehensive nodal irradiation to sole breast treatment as well as one randomized (n = 1407) and one prospective cohort study (n = 3377) analysing the additional treatment of the internal mammary chain against sole local and supraclavicular and axillary apex radiation. Compared to WBI/CWI alone the treatment of IM + MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.88; CI:0.78-0.99; p = 0.036) results in improved OS unlike MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.99; CI:0.86-1.14; p = 0,89). These results are confirmed in BCSS: IM + MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.82; CI:0.72-0.92; p = 0.002) and MS + WBI/CWI (HR = 0.96; CI:0.79-1.18; p = 0.69). PFS is significantly improved with the treatment of MS + WBI/CWI (OR = 0.83; CI:0.71-0.97; p = 0.019). Both nodal treatment volumes improve LRC (MS + WBI/CWI OR = 0.74; CI:0.62-0.87; p = 0.004 and IM + MS + WBI/CWI OR = 0.60; CI:0.43-0.86; p < 0,001). Yet only the internal mammary nodes provide a benefit in DMFS (MS + WBI/CWI HR = 0.97; CI:0.81-1.16; p = 0.74 and IM + MS + WBI/CWI HR = 0.84; CI:0.75-0.94; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Expanding the radiation field to the axillary apex and supraclavicular nodes after axillary node dissection reduced loco-regional recurrences without improvement in overall and cancer-specific survival. A prolongation in survival due to regional nodal irradiation is achieved when the internal mammary chain is included. This derives from a reduction in distant metastasis.

Quality of life after preoperative radio-/chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients

e12083

Background: Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (PRT/PCRT) represents an increasingly used clinical strategy in different tumor sites. However, concerns regarding a possible unfavorable influence on the clinical outcome still exist. The aim of the current study was to examine the long-term global health status in our series of LABC patients treated with PRT/PCRT followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME). Methods: Of the 315 patients treated with PRT/PCRT in the years 1991 and 1999, 203 patients were still alive at long-term follow up of mean 17.7 years (range 14-21). Thirty-seven patients were lost to follow up and 58 patients refused to be contacted, which resulted in 107 patients (64 patients after BCS and 43 after mastectomy) being available and willing to undergo further clinical assessment. PRT/PCRT consisted of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with 50 Gy (5 × 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/ infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with a consecutive electron boost or (in case of BCS) a 10-Gy interstitial brachytherapy boost with Ir-192 prior to EBRT. Overall, chemotherapy was administered either prior to RT or concomitantly in the majority of patients. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires for overall QoL and EORTC QLQ-BR23 for breast-specific QoL. Results are reported using functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, and future perspective) and symptom-related items (systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, and upset by hair loss). The results were compared to a published reference cohort of n=2028 healthy adults (16-92 years), including n=1139 women (age 16-92 years). EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales were also analyzed between different subgroups including an age-matched analysis with a two sided paired t-test. Results: In comparison with this healthy control group of 1139 women, we did not detect any significant differences for the functional scales measured by physical function, emotional well-being, cognitive, and social function as well as the symptom scales: fatigue, nausea, vomiting, pain, diarrhea and financial difficulties for both groups. However, significant inferior scores were found in the present study group regarding obstipation (p=0.013), loss of appetite (0.038), sleeping disorder (p=0.01) and dyspnoe (p=0.01). Conclusions: Taken together, retrospective as well as prospective data underline the feasibility of preoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer.