Short course para-aortic radiation for stage I seminoma of the testis

Recommendations for followup of stage I and II seminoma: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre approach

Testicular seminoma most commonly affects young men and is associated with favourable prognosis. Various followup schedules and imaging protocols for testicular seminoma have been described without overall consensus. We reviewed the literature together with our experience at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and present an evidence-based followup approach for patients with stage I and II seminoma.

[Role of radiotherapy in stage I testicular seminomas: about 25 cases]

Notre travail se proposait de rapporter les résultats d’une étude rétrospective, descriptive, portant sur 25 séminomes testiculaires de stade I et de préciser la place de la radiothérapie dans la prise en charge de cette entité. Entre janvier 2001 et décembre 2009, 25 patients atteints d'un séminome testiculaire de stade I ont été pris en charge au service de radiothérapie de l’institut national d’oncologie de Rabat. L’orchidectomie première a été réalisée par voie inguinale. Le bilan d’extension initial comportait un dosage de bHCG totale, d’alphafoetoprotéine, et une exploration des aires ganglionnaires sus- et sous-diaphragmatiques par une tomodensitométrie. L’irradiation adjuvante a été délivrée au moyen d’un accélérateur linéaire. L'âge médian est de 33 ans (18-52 ans). La tumeur testiculaire siégeait à droite chez 16 malades et à gauche chez les 9 autres. La radiothérapie était délivrée dans les aires ganglionnaires lomboaortiques pour 18 patients, lomboaortiques et iliaques homolatérales pour les 7 autres et ceci par deux faisceaux antéropostérieurs, délivrant une dose de 20 à 25 Gy en 10 à 14 fractions. La tolérance immédiate était excellente. La durée médiane de surveillance était de 73 mois. Vingt trois patients sont actuellement vivants, en situation de rémission complète. Un patient a rechuté au niveau pulmonaire 22 mois après la fin de sa radiothérapie. Un patient a été perdu de vue. Il n’a pas été observé de toxicité à long terme, en particulier gastro-intestinale. Aucune tumeur ou pathologie hématologique secondaire n’a été rapportée. La radiothérapie prophylactique reste le traitement adjuvant de référence des séminomes de stade I. La tolérance immédiate est satisfaisante et l’augmentation du risque de cancer secondaire est négligeable par rapport au bénéfice thérapeutique. Toutefois une surveillance armée ainsi qu’une chimiothérapie adjuvante avec un cycle de carboplatine sont aussi efficaces.

Acute cord compression secondary to spinal relapse of testicular seminomas

This is the first-reported case of an isolated thoracic spine relapse of a stage 1 testicular seminoma more than 1 year after surgery and radiotherapy. We report a 38-year-old gentleman, who underwent radical orchidectomy and adjuvant retroperitoneal irradiation for a pure testicular seminoma, presenting with acute cord compression from an isolated T8 relapse 14 months after the index surgery. Decompressive laminectomy with instrumentation was performed with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The patient gained full neurological recovery and has remained disease-free for 4 years. Testicular seminomas rarely relapse in the spine after treatment with surgery and radiotherapy, and it is usually the lumbar spine that is involved. Spinal relapse also commonly presents with pain rather than acute cord compression. This case report discusses the unique behaviour of testicular seminomas and their presentation in vertebral relapse. We also present a summary of the available literature on isolated thoracic spine relapse of testicular seminomas.

Management of stage I testicular seminoma

Adjuvant treatment options for stage I seminoma include surveillance, radiation, and hemotherapy. Despite excellent results for both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, many concerns have been raised in regards to the potential long-term toxicities of these treatments. To minimize the burden of treatment, there has been a shift away from adjuvant treatments for stage I testicular seminomas toward surveillance protocols for seminoma survivors. This article reviews the evidence for all adjuvant treatment options for stage I testicular seminomas with a particular focus on surveillance.

Pure seminoma: a review and update

Pure seminoma is a rare pathology of the young adult, often discovered in the early stages. Its prognosis is generally excellent and many therapeutic options are available, especially in stage I tumors. High cure rates can be achieved in several ways: standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and the patients' preferences should be considered when management decisions are made. This paper describes firstly the management of primary seminoma and its nodal involvement and, secondly, the various therapeutic options according to stage.

[What's new in the treatment of seminomas?]

Pure testicular seminoma is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Its management is controversial. In stage I disease, several treatment options are considered. Those are radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy alone or active surveillance, which is becoming increasingly popular. For more advanced stages, treatment is based on chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. In this article, we review thoroughly the existing literature and recent recommendations the various treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages in different stages of the disease.

[Stage 1 testicular seminoma]

Testicular cancer is rare, representing only 1 % of malignant tumors, but the most common cancer in young men, 15 to 35 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy after orchidectomy in testicular seminoma stage I, reduces risk of relapse. It aims to eradicate micro-metastatic disease in lymph drainage territories. In the case of adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse-free survival of 96 % with an overall survival of 98 % at 5 years. The irradiation volume is made up of lymph nodes paraaortic which it is possible to add the ipsilateral renal hilum to the testicular lesion. The current recommended dose is 20 Gy in 10 fractions and 2 weeks, usually delivered by two antero-posterior beams. The acute toxicities, mainly represented by nausea and diarrhea are usually quickly resolved to the end of irradiation. Regarding toxicities long-term, preservation of semen should be considered after surgery because of fear of infertility post-treatment. The risk of second cancer associated with exposure to ionizing radiation, albeit small, is especially important to consider these patients to significant life expectancy. Nevertheless, developments in radiotherapy techniques and lower doses and irradiated volumes can probably reduce this risk further.

Management options for stage I seminoma

Stage I seminoma is the most common clinical scenario among patients with testicular cancer. Following orchiectomy, various treatment alternatives (adjuvant radiotherapy, surveillance, chemotherapy) can be offered that yield similar efficacy results and definitive cure is the rule. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management choice and considerable debate has been raised in recent years. The pros and the cons associated with each therapy, as well as their long-term outcomes are discussed in this review. Overall burden of treatment needed, therapy-related morbidity, economic costs, quality of life issues and patient preferences should all be considered. Refinement in the knowledge of predictive factors for relapse and mounting experience with both surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy have led to consideration of risk-adapted treatment strategies as an alternative to standard radiotherapy. Although this model needs to be improved and validated, active close surveillance for low-risk patients and adjuvant therapy for those uncompliant or at higher risk of relapse seem to be acceptable options for patients with stage I seminoma.

Management of stage I seminomatous testicular cancer: a systematic review

The treatment options available for the management of stage I seminoma consist of either a surveillance strategy or adjuvant therapy after orchidectomy. A systematic review was undertaken to identify the optimal management strategy. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, in addition to the American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting Proceedings, were searched for the period 1981 to May 2007. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they discussed at least one of survival, recurrence, second malignancy, cardiac toxicity, or quality of life for patients with stage I seminoma. A search update was carried out in June 2009. Fifty-four reports satisfied the eligibility criteria, including seven clinical practice guidelines, one systematic review, three randomised controlled trials focused on treatment options, 26 non-randomised studies of treatment options, and 15 non-randomised long-term toxicity studies. The existing data suggest that virtually all patients with stage I testicular seminoma are cured regardless of the post-orchidectomy management. The 5-year survival reported in all the studies identified in this systematic review was over 95%, regardless of the management strategy, including surveillance alone with no adjuvant therapy. In conclusion, to date, the optimal management of stage I seminoma remains to be defined. Surveillance seems to be the preferable option, as this strategy minimises the toxicity that might be associated with adjuvant treatment, while preserving high long-term cure rates. The currently available evidence should be presented to patients in order to select the most appropriate option for the individual.

Posttreatment surveillance after paraaortic radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: a systematic analysis

CONTEXT

The extent and duration of routine follow-up after paraaortic (PA) radiotherapy for stage I seminoma remain controversial in terms of efficacy, costs of technical investigations and long-term morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current literature assessing routine follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We identified all published reports on PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma (1986-2005). We analyzed time patterns of recurrence, sites and methods of detection of relapse, and follow-up programs used.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 11 publications reporting outcome in 2,280 patients. Median time to recurrence in 80 relapsing patients was 15.5 months. Less than 10% of recurrences were diagnosed beyond the third year of follow-up. Isolated locoregional or distant recurrence was observed in 52 and 20 patients, respectively, without significant difference in median time to relapse. 19 out of 43 recurrences with reported method of detection of relapse were diagnosed by routine technical investigations. There was no significant difference in time to relapse between those patients followed with low volume as compared to high-volume imaging protocols.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that technical investigations in posttreatment surveillance should be restricted to the first 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, surveillance programs with a high volume of imaging apparently do not lead to earlier detection or less advanced stage at the time of relapse as compared to protocols with low volume imaging.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in stage I seminoma: is there a role for further reduction of treatment volume?

An analysis was performed to determine whether a cranial reduction of the portals to the T11/T12 junction instead of the common T10/T11 junction would alter the outcome of patients with stage I seminoma. Of 163 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed testicular seminoma referred to the authors' institution between April 1992 and April 1999, 80 patients with stage I seminoma were treated with cranially reduced para-aortic treatment fields reaching from the top of T12 to the bottom of L4. Median total dose was 20.0 Gy (range, 19.8-27.2 Gy). Patients were followed-up by the use of CT in regular intervals. After a median follow-up of 7.1 years (range, 4.1-11.1 years), four patients (5%) had relapsed resulting in an actuarial 5-year relapse-free survival of 95%. No patients relapsed within the cranially reduced treatment volume above the top of T12. The cranial reduction of the para-aortic treatment fields resulted in a median reduction of treatment volume of 16% (range, 13-21%). The achieved median reduction in treatment volume of 16% appears to be relevant and is not associated with an increased relapse rate. This approach is recommended in analogy to the surgical approach in NSGCT to further minimize the risk of radiation-related late effects.

What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.

Management of Low-Stage Testicular Seminoma

Testicular seminoma represents a modern model of a multidisciplinary approach to a curable neoplasm. Surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists play an important role in disease detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. This article focuses on the management of men who have early-stage seminoma, which represents stage I and IIa (minimal retroperitoneal spread). In stage I disease, the major controversies continue to revolve around surveillance versus adjuvant treatment and more recently adjuvant radiotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Focus on long-term complications, such as cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal disease, and secondary cancers, has led to the concept of increased surveillance with therapy for those who relapse. Radiation therapy remains the mainstay of therapy for patients who have stage IIa disease.

Stage I seminoma in a 15-year-old boy

Seminomas are very rare tumours in children and adolescents. We describe a case of seminoma in a 15-year-old boy who was managed with orchidectomy but no adjuvant therapy. He remains relapse-free 8 years after surgery as determined by clinical, radiological and serological surveillance. This study emphasizes the uncertainty over the need for adjuvant treatment in the management of seminoma in the adolescent patient, in particular in prepubescent children.

Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma

BACKGROUND

The authors developed evidence-based guidelines for a follow-up schedule after orchiectomy for stage 1 seminoma. Required investigations, frequency of assessment, overall duration of follow-up, and management strategies were identified.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed of prospective studies in stage 1 seminoma. Studies published after 1980 were considered eligible for inclusion. Data extracted included relapse-free rates, number of patients at risk, and relapse locations. Five strategies were identified: Surveillance, Extended-Field Radiotherapy, Para-aortic Radiotherapy, and either 1 or 2 cycles of Carboplatin Chemotherapy. For each strategy, Kaplan-Meier relapse-free estimates were used to calculate weighted-mean cumulative hazards of relapse over time. These were used to calculate semiannual weighted-mean relapse hazards.

RESULTS

Seventeen prospective studies with a total of 5561 patients were identified. Actuarial data on relapse was available in 5013 (90.1%) patients, and 92.9% of all relapses had location data reported. Annual hazard rates for relapse were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based recommendations for follow-up frequency based on risk of relapse were formulated. The authors suggested 3 times per year when the risk is >5%, 2 times per year when the risk is 1% to 5%, and annually until the risk is <0.3%. Investigations should reflect location(s) at risk of relapse and include computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis for surveillance and adjuvant carboplatin, whereas for para-aortic radiotherapy, pelvic computed tomography alone is required. These recommendations offer the possibility of maximal patient convenience and optimal healthcare resource allocation without compromising disease control.

Treatment Options, Prognostic Factors and Selection of Treatment in Stage I Seminoma

Treatment options in patients with stage I seminoma include radiotherapy (RT), surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. This patient population has virtually a 100% cure rate whichever approach is taken. While adjuvant retroperitoneal RT has been the standard of care for the past 50-60 years, there is increasingly persuasive data that adjuvant RT in this setting is associated with a small but definite increased risk of second malignancy and cardiovascular death. The long-term data from surveillance series have documented the safety of this approach, and it is now accepted that a policy of surveillance is the optimal management approach. This gives a relapse rate of 15%, and most patients can be successfully salvaged with RT. Second relapse after salvage RT occurs in a small proportion of cases, and these patients are cured with chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy using carboplatin has been investigated as an alternative strategy but has not lived up to its initial promise. If used, then 2 courses of treatment should probably be given. It must be remembered that 80-85% of patients with testicular seminoma require no treatment after orchiectomy, and the long-term side effects of any adjuvant treatment approach must be carefully considered.

Low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma—long-term results

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review retrospectively the results of low-dose radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma using four different fractionation schedules and target volume definitions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 191 patients underwent irradiation for histologically proven Stage I seminoma after undergoing an inguinal orchiectomy. Fractionation schedules were used one after another as follows: Total dose 30 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 16 patients), total dose 25.5 Gy (dose/fraction 1.5 Gy, 62 patients), total dose 20 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 69 patients), total dose 26 Gy (dose/fraction 2 Gy, 29 patients). The remaining 12 patients were excluded from this study. In the same period the target volume was gradually reduced. In 1983 the paraaortic, pelvic and inguinal regions were irradiated; later the target volume was reduced to the paraaortic region exclusively.

RESULTS

Overall survival and event-free survival were identical in all groups ranging from 95% to 100% /5 years. Three patients experienced a lymph node metastasis during follow-up, 3 patients a distant metastasis to the lung and the bones. Mild acute side effects were noted in 8% to 15% of the patients, and very mild long-term side effects in 1% to 5% of patients. Multivariate analysis showed no prognostic significance of total dose, dose per fraction, or target volume. In univariate analysis, a higher frequency of acute side effects to the skin and the bowel was related to a higher total dose, and an elevated frequency of nausea was related to a higher daily dose per fraction.

CONCLUSION

Using lower doses and limiting the target volume to the paraaortic region exclusively did not result in a worse prognosis in our patient series.

Radiotherapy in the management of common genitourinary malignancies

A continued role for radiation therapy in the multidisciplinary management of genitourinary malignancies seems certain. Treatment outcomes continue to improve, accompanied by diminishing rates of toxicity. With continued technologic advances in the delivery of radiation, including the use of adaptive radiotherapy, the discovery and application of novel treatment agents, and the combined efforts of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists, patients who have genitourinary malignancies have an excellent chance of cure.

New Guidelines for Clinical Stage I Testicular Seminoma?

Clinical stage I (CS I) seminoma has been the subject of various studies aimed at finding the ideal treatment. Due to its high radiosensitivity, radiotherapy has been the standard approach for decades. However, the fact that CS I seminoma has a recurrence rate of only 15-20% has prompted many suggestions for better treatment stratification offering surveillance therapy for a subgroup of patients. Moreover, carboplatinum-based monochemotherapy has been the topic of various retrospective studies demonstrating equal effectiveness for adjuvant chemotherapy with one cycle of carboplatin. Since seminoma affects men in their mid-30s, only few reports have been published on long-term survival with reference to radiotoxicity and secondary malignancies. Long-term side effects and secondary malignancies pose an increasing problem for long-term survivors of primary malignancies treated by chemo- or radiotherapy. This becomes evident after a follow-up of 15 years. Since recent studies have disclosed unexpectedly high long-term morbidity and mortality after irradiation, this article critically reviews the value of radiotherapy and carboplatinum-based chemotherapy as equally effective treatment options for CS I seminoma.

Adverse effects after radiotherapy for early stage (I,IIa,IIb) seminoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The evaluation of adverse effects after radiotherapy for early stage (I,IIa,IIb) seminoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 164 patients with stage I, IIa, IIb seminoma treated with post-orchidectomy irradiation, between 1974 and 1990 was performed. Patients had been treated with infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy only (IDRT) in 48%, and prophylactic mediastinal and left supraclavicular irradiation (supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy, SDRT) was performed additionally in the remaining 52% of patients. Median follow-up was 12 years. The incidence of late morbidity was evaluated with respect to treatment-related factors like: PTV, number of fields irradiated each day, beam energy, total dose and dose per fraction. Afterwards, the dose distribution in normal tissues-based on dose per fraction at 3 cm depth and total dose at 3 cm depth, was evaluated in relation to late morbidity.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year and 10-year survival was 92 and 86%. For IDRT, dose per fraction at midline and dose per fraction from AP field at 3 cm depth were not significantly associated with Gastro-Intestinal morbidity. For SDRT, dose per fraction at 3 cm depth from AP field was significantly associated with cardiac morbidity (mean-1.98 Gy in patients without and 2.27 Gy in patients with cardiac morbidity P=0.006), however total dose at 3 cm was not significantly associated with cardiac morbidity. Dose per fraction at 3 cm depth from AP field significantly (P=0.047) influenced cardiac morbidity probability in multivariate logistic regression, which included patients' age, smoking habits and total dose at 3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive dose maximum in normal tissues from each fraction to anterior mediastinum is associated with increased cardiac morbidity.

Towards individualised radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently standard treatment of Stage I seminoma (SOS). The use of computerised tomogram (CT) planning is compared with traditional planning for greater treatment individualisation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two plans were generated for each of 10 patients: one using traditional rectangular para-aortic fields, and one using conformal fields. The primary target volume compared was the dosimetric coverage of the inferior vena cava and aorta.

RESULTS

The dosimetric analysis of traditional plans showed that they provided reasonable dosimetric coverage of the CTV. However, if 1cm is used for uncertainty based on nodal coverage then the periphery of the PTV could be significantly under-dosed. The CT based plan delivered improved dosimetry to the vessel PTV compared with the traditional field (CT D 95=24.7 Gy, traditional D 95=23.6 Gy, P=0.002). CT-based plans were significantly wider than traditional plans (CT=11.8 cm, traditional=9 cm, P=0.002). The CT plan tended to irradiate relatively small volumes of the kidneys to higher doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional para-aortic fields may deliver suboptimal dosimetry to an anatomically defined PTV. Our CT-based fields tend to be wider than traditional fields, and provide improved dosimetry to vessels based target volumes. Given that traditional fields are often delivering significantly less than the prescribed dose to the target volume, and that marginal relapses cause a high proportion of treatment failure, there is a suggestion that CT-based plans may avoid under-dosage and geographical miss sometimes seen with traditional plans.

CNS germinoma with elevated serum human chorionic gonadotropin level: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome

PURPOSE

The prognostic significance of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level in central nervous system germinoma remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognosis of germinoma patients with normal and high HCG titers in the serum.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We undertook a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 103 patients with central nervous system germinoma whose serum HCG and/or beta-HCG level had been measured before treatment between 1984 and 2002. All patients had been treated with radiation therapy either alone (n = 66) or in combination with chemotherapy (n = 37) with a median dose of 47.8 Gy.

RESULTS

HCG and/or beta-HCG level in the serum was high in 39% of all patients. The proportion of HCG-producing tumors was higher in the lesions at the basal ganglia than in the lesions at the other sites. No correlation was found between tumor size and HCG level, but there seemed to be a weak correlation between size and beta-HCG. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 96% and 94%, respectively, in both patient groups with normal and high HCG (p = 0.99). The 5- and 10-year relapse-free survival rates were 87% and 82%, respectively, in patients with normal HCG level and were both 87% in patients with high HCG (p = 0.74). Also, no other patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors seemed to influence the prognosis of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Serum HCG level does not seem to influence patient prognosis when treated with sufficient doses of radiation. Relationship between tumor size and site and HCG level should be investigated further.

Germ cell tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of some of the recent pre-clinical and clinical developments in germ cell tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent epidemiological studies highlight the variations in the geographic and ethnic distribution of germ cell tumors and the changing incidence of seminoma versus nonseminoma in the population. Additional studies are continuing to identify risk factors for germ cell tumors. Expression profiling, both at the gene and protein levels, is beginning to identify, at the molecular level, some of the factors associated not only with germ cell pluripotency but also with the different histologic subtypes of germ cell tumors. Work in the area of identifying potentially new serum tumor markers in germ cell tumor, as well as the role of the traditional tumor markers in predicting outcome to therapy is ongoing. Data is emerging on the role of positron emission tomography in evaluating residual lesions in seminoma. Evolving data on chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery further complements and clarifies information on these treatment modalities, and their potential toxicities, in the management of germ cell tumors.

SUMMARY

Ongoing preclinical and epidemiological studies highlight the complexities underlying germ cell tumor pathogenesis. With enhanced understanding of some of these processes, treatments, particularly for advanced stages, will continue to evolve.

Long-term results of para-aortic irradiation for patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis

PURPOSE

Adjuvant postoperative para-aortic lymph nodal irradiation is an acceptable alternative to para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvic irradiation postorchiectomy for patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis. In this article, we report the long-term results of our prospective evaluation of para-aortic irradiation only for such patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between March 1991 and September 2000, 71 patients with Stage I seminoma were treated with adjuvant irradiation to the para-aortic region only after radical inguinal orchiectomy. Radiotherapy was delivered using parallel-opposed fields extending from T11 to L5. A total dose of 25 Gy in 15 fractions was prescribed to midpoint. Follow-up was performed every 3 months for the first year, every 4 months for the second and third years, every 6 months for the fourth and fifth years, and annually thereafter. Chest X-ray, tumor markers, and computed tomography scan of the pelvis were performed routinely as part of the follow-up investigation.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 75 months, 68 of 71 patients are alive and free of relapse. Only 1 patient (1.4%) experienced failure in the ipsilateral inguinal nodal region. Two patients (2.8%) died of unrelated causes. The actuarial 10-year relapse free survival is 98.5% and the actuarial 10-year overall survival is 92%. No late toxicity has been encountered.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis may be safely treated with para-aortic radiotherapy only. Risk of pelvic failure is very low and treatment toxicity minimal.

Randomized Trial of 30 Versus 20 Gy in the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage I Testicular Seminoma: A Report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328)

Purpose

To assess the possibility of reducing radiotherapy doses without compromising efficacy in the management of patients with stage I seminoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients were randomly assigned 20 Gy/10 fractions over 2 weeks or 30 Gy/15 fractions during 3 weeks after orchidectomy. They completed a symptom diary card during treatment and quality-of-life forms pre- and post-treatment. The trial was powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year relapse rates of 3% to 4% (α = .05 [one sided]; 90% power).

Results

From 1995 to 1998, 625 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Four weeks after starting radiotherapy, significantly more patients receiving 30 Gy reported moderate or severe lethargy (20% v 5%) and an inability to carry out their normal work (46% v 28%). However, by 12 weeks, levels in both groups were similar. With a median follow-up of 61 months, 10 and 11 relapses, respectively, have been reported in the 30- and 20-Gy groups (hazard ratio, 1.11; 90% CI, 0.54 to 2.28). The absolute difference in 2-year relapse rates is 0.7%; the lower 90% confidence limit is 2.9%. Only one patient has died from seminoma (allocated to the 20-Gy treatment group).

Conclusion

Treatment with 20 Gy in 10 fractions is unlikely to produce relapse rates more than 3% higher than for standard 30 Gy radiation therapy, and data on an additional 469 patients randomly assigned in a subsequent trial support and strengthen these results. Reductions in morbidity enable patients to return to work more rapidly. Prolonged follow-up is required before any inference can be made about any impact of allocated treatment on new primary cancer diagnoses.

[Therapeutical options for seminomas at clinical stage I-IIA/B]

Seminomas represent the most common histological subgroup of all testicular germ cell tumors. About 75% of all seminomas present as clinical stage I disease at time of initial diagnosis and exhibit a long-term cure rate of 99%. Management strategies maintaining these high cure rates but minimizing the risks need are actively pursued. Currently, three treatment strategies are available for stage I seminomas: surveillance, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Pathohistological prognostic factors allow an individualized risk-adapted therapeutic approach. Tumor size < or =4 cm and absence of rete testis invasion define a low-risk group with a recurrence rate of 12% being best managed by surveillance. Tumor size >4 cm and presence of rete testis invasion define a high-risk with a 35% risk of relapse, best managed by active therapy. Active treatment either consists of radiation of the ipsilateral paracaval or paraaortic lymph nodes with 20 Gy or of adjuvant chemotherapy with 2 cycles of carboplatin. It is currently unclear if 1 cycle carboplatin is as effective as 2 cycles; if this approach is performed follow-up has to be standardized and a compliance of both patient and physician are mandatory.