Close or positive margins after surgical resection for the head and neck cancer patient: the addition of brachytherapy improves local control

Dose escalation in oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence is the most common pattern of failure in head and neck cancer. It can therefore be hypothesised that some of these patients would benefit from an intensified local treatment, such as radiation dose escalation of the primary tumour. This study compares treatment and toxicity outcomes from two different boost modalities in oropharyngeal cancer: simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and brachytherapy boost.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-four consecutive patients treated with > 72 Gy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data on side effects were collected from a local quality registry and supplemented with a review of medical records. Patients receiving a brachytherapy boost first had external beam radiotherapy consisting of 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the gross tumour volume (GTV), and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally. The brachytherapy boost was typically given using pulsed dose rate, 15 fractions and 0.56-0.66 Gy per fraction [total dose in EQD2 = 75.4-76.8 Gy (α/β = 10)]. The typical dose escalated radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy only, was delivered using SIB with 74,8 Gy in 2.2 Gy fractions [EQD2 = 76.0 Gy (α/β = 10)] to the primary tumour, 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to GTV + 10 mm margin and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally.

RESULTS

Dose escalation by SIB was given to 111 patients and brachytherapy boost to 134 patients. The most common type of cancer was base of tongue (55%), followed by tonsillar cancer (42%). The majority of patients had T3- or T4-tumours and 84% were HPV-positive. The 5-year OS was 72,4% (95% CI 66.9-78.3) and the median follow-up was 6.1 years. Comparing the two different dose escalation modalities we found no significant differences in OS or PFS and these results remained after a propensity-score matched analysis was performed. The analysis of grade ≥ 3 side effects showed no significant differences between the two different dose escalation techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant differences in survival or grade ≥ 3 side effects comparing simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost as alternative dose escalation modalities in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

Surgical Treatment of Early Glottic Cancer

The incidence of all head and neck malignancies is rising worldwide, with carcinoma of the larynx constituting approximately 1% of all cancers. Early glottic cancer responds quite favorably to surgical intervention due to its early presentation, coupled with the low rate of regional and distant metastases. This article focuses on various approaches to the surgical treatment of early glottic cancer. Details include the clinical and radiological evaluation of laryngeal cancer, the goals of treatment, current surgical options for early disease, approach to surgical resection margins and management of nodal disease, and complications associated with each treatment modality.

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

Dose volume histogram constraints in patients with head and neck cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant HDR brachytherapy: A proposal of the head and neck and skin GEC ESTRO Working group

BACKGROUND

The Head and Neck and Skin (HNS) Working group of the GEC-ESTRO acknowledges the lack of widely accepted Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) constraints in adjuvant head and neck brachytherapy and issues recommendations to minimize mandibular Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and Soft Tissue Necrosis (STN).

METHODS

A total of 227 patients with the diagnosis of head and neck cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant HDR brachytherapy alone or combined with other treatment modalities during the period 2000-2018 were analyzed.

RESULTS

STN was observed in 28 out of 227 cases (12.3%) with an average time to appearance of 4.0 months. In previously unirradiated cases, there was a positive correlation between CTV size and STN (p = 0.017) and a trend towards significance between Total EQD2-DVH TV₁₀₀ dose and STN (p = 0.06). The risk of STN in the absence of both factors (i.e, CTV < 15 cm³ and Total EQD2-DVH TV₁₀₀ dose < 87 Gy) was 2%, with one factor present 15.7% and with both factors 66.7% (p = 0.001). ORN was observed in 13 out of 227 cases (5.7%) with an average time to appearance of 26.2 months. In unirradiated cases, ORN correlated with Total Physical Dose to Mandible_2cm3 (p = 0.027). Patients receiving Total Physical Doses greater than 61 Gy had a 20-fold increased risk of ORN.

CONCLUSIONS

In Unirradiated patients the panel recommends to avoid implantation of postoperative CTVs exceeding 15 cm³ at Total EQD2-DVH TV₁₀₀ doses in excess of 87 Gy as well as to limit the irradiation of the Mandible_2cm3 to 61 Gy. In previously irradiated patients the panel cannot make a recommendation based on the available results.

A multicenter prospective phase II study of postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers with high risk margins: the STEREO POSTOP GORTEC 2017-03 trial

Background

Primary surgery is usually the mainstay treatment in early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer. Typically, neck surgery is performed. Negative tumor margins are recommended (> 5 mm). If feasible, re-resection of any positive margin is preferred. Otherwise, postoperative radiotherapy is required. Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy can be limited to the primary site for patients with pT1-T2 tumors and negative neck exploration. Currently, both fractionated external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy can have a role in the postoperative management of early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins. Another possible alternative could be postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative SBRT in the treatment of early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins.

Methods

The STEREO POSTOP study is a national, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial within the GORTEC network. Patients with early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers with high risk margins indicating the need for postoperative radiation are eligible for enrollment. SBRT consists of a total dose of 36 Gy in 6 fractions over 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is severe late toxicity defined as 2-year toxicity of grade ≥ 3 according to CTCAE V4.03 classification. The secondary endpoints include acute toxicity (≤ 3 months), local and locoregional control, disease-free and overall survival, quality of life of patients, nutritional impact and predictive factors of toxicity. The experimental design chosen is a one-step Fleming plan design without interim analysis as the primary endpoint will be evaluated at a 2-year follow-up. Ninety patients will be recruited. The study was started in January 2018 with a 4-year enrollment period and an estimated completion in January 2024.

Discussion

This study is the first prospective trial to evaluate head and neck cancer postoperative SBRT in the setting of early-stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancers with high risk margins. SBRT is an attractive option because it delivers a highly conformal dose of radiation in a limited number of fractions (like brachytherapy but with less contraindication), with steep dose gradients resulting in reduced normal tissue irradiation and with a short overall treatment time.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03401840, registered on 17-1-2018. Identifier in French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°ID - RCB 2017-A02058–45, registered on July 2017.

Protocol version: Version 3 dated from 25th November 2019.

The presence of risk factors and corresponding treatment strategies post-surgical resection in stage IV hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

This study aims to explore the adverse features and determine whether adjuvant chemoradiation after surgical resection can benefit stage IV hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC) patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review covering 267 patients with stage IV HSCC. Propensity score-matched analysis was employed to reduce selection bias.

Results

T3–T4 or N2c–N3 stage, positive surgical margin, extracapsular spread and lymphovascular invasion were adverse features for overall survival (OS) in stage IV HSCC patients. For patients possessing these adverse features, those who received postoperative adjuvant treatment (PAT) had significantly better OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than patients who did not (P value =0.000 and 0.007, respectively). In addition, adjuvant chemoradiation demonstrated better OS and RFS compared to adjuvant radiation (P value =0.030 and 0.017, respectively). However, PAT showed no significant impact on OS and RFS (P value =0.776 and 0.847, respectively) in patients without adverse features.

Conclusions

Adjuvant treatments are recommended for stage IV HSCC patients that possess adverse features of pT3 and pT4 stages, N2c and N3 stages, positive surgical margin, extracapsular spread and lymphovascular invasion. For these patients, postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is preferred. For patients without adverse features, observation and regular re-examination is sufficient post tumour resection.

[Brachytherapy for head and neck cancers]

The main indications of the brachytherapy of head and neck cancers are the limited tumours of the lip, the nose, the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Nasopharynx tumours are nowadays treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This technique can be exclusive, associated with external radiotherapy or postoperative. It can also be a salvage treatment for the second primaries in previously irradiated areas. If the low dose rate brachytherapy rules remain the reference, the pulse dose rate technique allows the prescription of the dose rate and the optimisation of the dose distribution. Results of high dose rate brachytherapy are now published. This paper reports the recommendations of the Gec-ESTRO, published in 2017, and takes into account the data of the historical low dose rate series, and is upgraded with the pulsed-dose rate and high dose rate series.

Clinicopathological factors influencing the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with T4a hypopharyngeal cancer

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors influencing outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with T4a hypopharyngeal cancer.

Methods

The present study enrolled 93 patients diagnosed with T4a hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent primary surgery between January 2005 and December 2015 at six medical centers in Korea. Primary tumor sites included pyriform sinus in 71 patients, posterior pharyngeal wall in 14 patients, and postcricoid region in 8 patients. Seventy-two patients received postoperative radio(chemo)therapy.

Results

Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 38% and 45%, respectively. In univariate analysis, 5-year DFS was found to have significant and positive correlations with margin involvement (p < 0.001) and extracapsular spread (p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis confirmed that margin involvement (hazard ratio (HR): 2.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-5.30; p = 0.001) and extracapsular spread (HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.08-3.99; p = 0.028) were significant factors associated with 5-year DFS. In univariate analysis, cervical lymph node metastasis (p = 0.048), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.041), extracapsular spread (p = 0.015), and esophageal invasion (p = 0.033) were significant factors associated with 5-year DSS. In multivariate analysis, extracapsular spread (HR: 2.98; 95% CI: 1.39-6.42; p = 0.005) and esophageal invasion (HR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.38-5.98; p = 0.005) remained significant factors associated with 5-year DSS.

Conclusion

Margin involvement and extracapsular spread are factors influencing recurrence while extracapsular spread and esophageal invasion are factors affecting survival in patients with T4a hypopharyngeal cancer treated by primary surgery.

[Description of the GORTEC 2017-03 study: Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margin (PHRC-K-16-164)]

The GORTEC 2017-03-Stereo-postop study is a phase 2, multicentric, nationwide study, funded by the hospital clinical research program (PHRC). The sponsor is Centre Jean-Perrin in Clermont-Ferrand, in partnership with the GORTEC. The principal investigators are Dr J Biau and Dr M Lapeyre. The main objective is to study severe late toxicity of postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (6×6Gy) for early stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins. The secondary objectives include acute toxicity, efficacy, nutritional impact and quality of life. The population is adult patients, with pT1 or pT2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or oral cavity (except lips), without indication of neck irradiation or concomitant chemotherapy, with at risk margin (R1, less than 5mm or uncertain). Ninety patients will be included over a 2-year period; this was calculated to limit the rate of 2-year severe toxicity at 5 to 15%, with a 2-year local control of at least 80 to 90%. If this study is considered as positive, stereotactic radiotherapy (6×6Gy) could become the third therapeutic option, with brachytherapy and normofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), for postoperative irradiation of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins.

Adverse pathologic features in early oral squamous cell carcinoma and the role of postoperative radiotherapy-a review

The use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in early stage oral cancer with adverse pathologic features (APFs) is controversial. Prognostically relevant APFs reviewed were perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, depth of invasion, worst pattern of invasion, and margin status. The current literature remains divided with regard to the benefit of treatment escalation in these patients; although these patients are at high risk for recurrence, the morbidity of PORT needs to be balanced against the likely benefit in disease control. A wide heterogeneity in the literature exists, likely as a result of differences in treatment protocols. We performed a literature review of the role of PORT in early-stage oral cancer with APFs. Based on the current evidence, the decision to administer adjuvant therapy needs to be made on an individual basis; patients with >1 APF are likely to benefit from PORT, and the use of risk-scoring systems may help in decision making.

Analysis of surgical margins in oral cancer using in situ fluorescence spectroscopy

Oral cancer is a public health problem with high prevalence in the population. Local tumor control is best achieved by complete surgical resection with adequate margins. A disease-free surgical margin correlates with a lower rate of local recurrence and a higher rate of disease-free survival. Fluorescence spectroscopy is a noninvasive diagnostic tool that can aid in real-time cancer detection. The technique, which evaluates the biochemical composition and structure of tissue fluorescence, is relatively simple, fast and, accurate.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare oral squamous cell carcinoma lesions to surgical margins and the mucosa of healthy volunteers by fluorescence spectroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample consisted of 56 individuals, 28 with oral squamous cell carcinoma and 28 healthy volunteers with normal oral mucosa. Thirty six cases (64.3%) were male and the mean age was 60.9 years old. The spectra were classified and compared to histopathology to determine fluorescence efficiency for diagnostic discrimination of tumors.

RESULTS

In the analysis of the other cases we observed discrimination between normal mucosa, injury and margins. At two-year follow up, three individuals had local recurrence, and in two cases investigation fluorescence in the corresponding area showed qualitative differences in spectra between the recurrence area and the area without recurrence at the same anatomical site in the same patient.

CONCLUSION

In situ analysis of oral mucosa showed the potential of fluorescence spectroscopy as a diagnostic tool that can aid in discrimination of altered mucosa and normal mucosa.

Standardized Uptake Value and Resection Margin Involvement Predict Outcomes in pN0 Head and Neck Cancer

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of patients with pathologically negative lymph node (pN0) head and neck cancer.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

College medical center.

Subjects and Methods

The medical records of 120 patients were reviewed. Primary tumor sites included 46 larynx, 45 oral cavity, 17 oropharynx, and 12 hypopharynx.

Results

The recurrence rate was 14% (17/120) over a mean observation period of 33 months. Median 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax; using 8.5 as a cutoff; P = .001), positive surgical margins ( P = .005), and pathologic T stage ( P = .012) were found to be associated with recurrence. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate (DSSR) in our cohort was 86%. Patients with an SUVmax value higher than 8.5 and positive surgical margins had significantly decreased 5-year DSSR based on Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed the significant association between median SUVmax (using 8.5 as a cutoff; hazard ratio [HR], 6.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-20.93; P = .004) and margin involvement (HR, 4.98; 95% CI, 1.42-17.47; P = .012).

Conclusion

A median 18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax cutoff values of 8.5 or greater and positive surgical margins were associated with adverse outcomes in patients with pN0 head and neck cancer.

Postoperative 125I brachytherapy delivered by digital model obturators for recurrent or locally advanced maxillary cancers

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of postoperative (125) I brachytherapy delivered by use of digital model obturators for recurrent or locally advanced maxillary cancers.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2008, 12 patients (seven females; median age, 65 years; range, 22-86 years) with recurrent or locally advanced maxillary cancers showing positive margins after surgery underwent (125) I brachytherapy by use of digital model obturators and interstitial implants. The radioactivity was 18.5 to 33.3 MBq per seed, and the prescription dose was 80 to 160 Gy. Functional outcome of patients was evaluated by the Performance Status Scale (PSS) for head and neck cancer before and after brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The (125) I seeds and dosages were well distributed in the radiation fields, and all patients had higher PSS scores after than before treatment with obturators. During a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 28-62 months), local control at 3 and 5 years was 83.3% and 66.7%, respectively, with a mean local control time of 53.5 ± 3.79 months. Overall survival at 3 and 5 years was 91.7% and 71.4%, respectively, with a mean survival time of 56.6 ± 2.99 months. Two patients died due to local recurrence, and one patient died due to lung metastasis. No patient had severe complications during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

(125) I brachytherapy delivered by digital model obturator is effective in treating maxillary cancers with positive margins after maxillectomy for advanced or recurrent cancer. The method may improve the quality of life of patients with maxillary defects. Laryngoscope, 2012.

Contemporary management of cancer of the oral cavity

Oral cancer represents a common entity comprising a third of all head and neck malignant tumors. The options for curative treatment of oral cavity cancer have not changed significantly in the last three decades; however, the work up, the approach to surveillance, and the options for reconstruction have evolved significantly. Because of the profound functional and cosmetic importance of the oral cavity, management of oral cavity cancers requires a thorough understanding of disease progression, approaches to management and options for reconstruction. The purpose of this review is to discuss the most current management options for oral cavity cancers.

Intraoperative consultation (IOC) in mucosal lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract

Intraoperative consultation (frozen section) plays an important part in the treatment of the head and neck cancer patient. The appropriate use of intraoperative consultations (frozen sections) usually results in a definitive diagnosis with immediate therapeutic impact while the patient is in the operating room. Among the determinations made by frozen section analysis include the evaluation of adequacy of surgical margins of resection; the differentiation between nonneoplastic, benign and malignant proliferations; the evaluation of lymph nodes for the presence of metastatic disease; the determination of specimen identification and specimen adequacy, including the verification of such organs as the parathyroid glands; and the determination of whether a given case requires special diagnostic testing best performed on frozen material, such as for lymphomas. This paper focuses on intraoperative consultation of mucosal lesions of the upper aerodigestive tract, including epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. Other issues that often not diagnosed or at issue at the time of surgery, including the diagnosis of microinvasive carcinoma and differentiating inflammatory lesions from neoplastic lesions are included for completion.

Status of primary tumour surgical margins in squamous head and neck cancer: prognostic implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To look at the current published literature on squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck, at the microscopic level, and the implications of molecular and genetic research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The goal of surgical treatment is still complete eradication of the primary tumour with a 'safe margin'. To achieve this 'safe margin' is not always possible, however. Currently, there is no agreed consensus as to how to submit tissue for frozen section, or how to define a 'clear margin'. Histopathologically, there are two margins requiring analysis, the mucosal margin and the 'deep margin'. Margins declared histopathologically 'tumour free' can be found to be positive for malignant/premalignant cells when molecular markers are applied. When the presence of genetically altered cells is suggested in the margins, there is an increased risk of a recurrent or new tumour. There is limited application of such knowledge and further trials are awaited.

SUMMARY

Standard histopathology has limitations for examining surgical margins. The probability of recurrent malignant disease is explained and this is much increased when molecular markers are identified in the resected margins. Further studies are required.

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with cervical dissection on head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature is scarce regarding the use of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (I-HDR) as adjuvant treatment of the cervical region, and most reports are focused on primary tumors of the mobile tongue and oropharynx. We evaluated the outcome and morbidity related to an institutional treatment policy, using I-HDR as the sole adjuvant treatment or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at the Departments of Radiation Oncology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital do Cancer, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

From October 1994 to December 2003, charts of 42 patients who had biopsy-proven cervical head and neck cancer, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 8-111 months), were reviewed. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 31-76 years), and the male/female ratio was 4.25:1.00. Thirty-five patients had previous irradiation with EBRT, with doses ranging from 30 Gy to 65 Gy (median, 52 Gy). The total dose of I-HDR ranged from 12 Gy to 48 Gy (median, 24 Gy), given in three to 14 fractions (median, 6 fractions) in 2 to 8 days (median, 4 days).

RESULTS

The total treatment time ranged from 19 to 83 days (median, 35 days). The 5- and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates were 52.5% and 48.1%, respectively; and the relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 48.5% and 38.1%, respectively. The only statistically significant prognostic factor for RFS and OS at 5 and 8 years was margin status (p = .0050). Four patients (9.5%) had late adverse side effects, such as local dehiscence (n = 2), local ulcer (n = 1), and extensive neck fibrosis (n = 1), not related to a higher dose to the skin or graft.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that I-HDR can be recommended in selected patients with first presentation lesions, local recurrences, or second primary carcinomas, even with a previous course of EBRT, but further studies are eagerly awaited to delineate the optimum schedule for this combination-treatment modality.

Postoperative brachytherapy alone and combined postoperative radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, with positive or close margins

BACKGROUND

Postoperative radiotherapy is necessary for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity with positive or close margins. The aim of the study is to define the indications of postoperative brachytherapy (BRT).

METHODS

From 1979 to 1993, 82 patients with positive or close margins had postoperative BRT (58 T1-2, 24 T3-4, 45 mobile tongue, 37 floor of mouth). Forty-six patients had combined radiotherapy (RT) with a mean dose of 48 Gy, and BRT boost with a mean dose of 24 Gy. Thirty-six patients had BRT alone with a mean dose of 60 Gy. BRT was performed with interstitial low dose rate Iridium 192.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC) at 5 years were, respectively, for T1-2/N0N- with BRT, 75%, 85%, and 88%,and with RT-BRT 70%, 92%, and 92%; for T1-2/N+ with RT-BRT, 44%, 67%, and 78%; for T3-4/N- with RT-BRT, 42%, 90%, and 80%; and for T3-4/N+ with RT-BRT, 22%, 43%, and 57%. Prognostic factors for OS, CSS, and LC were N+ (p </=.009), extracapsular spread (ECS+;p </=.000001), and T stage for LC only (p =.02). Prognostic factors for complications were a high number of wires with a cutoff at five wires (p =.008), a high dose rate with a cutoff at 0.57 Gy/hr (p =.01), and a high total dose (BRT + RT) with a cutoff at 71 Gy (p =.07).

CONCLUSIONS

BRT alone for SCC T1-2/N0N- is better than RT-BRT because, with equivalent results, it avoids the adverse events of postoperative RT (xerostomia) and permits the treatment of a second head and neck primary in nonirradiated tissue. The results for the T3-4/N- are acceptable with this approach (ie, RT-BRT) but may be improved for N+.

Intralesional radioimmunotherapy with Yttrium-90-labeled human monoclonal IgM in nude mice bearing human tumor xenografts

Biodistribution studies demonstrate that intralesional administration of radiolabeled IgM results in high retention of radioactivity with little normal tissue uptake. This study examines the therapeutic potential of this modality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nude mice bearing subcutaneous human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts were treated with single intralesional (IL) injections of tumor-reactive human monoclonal IgM (CR4E8) labeled with 25-394 microCi of yttrium-90 (90Y). Untreated mice, mice treated with IL unlabeled immunoconjugate or IL 90Y-aggregate, 160-400 microCi, served as controls. Mice were monitored for tumor growth and toxicity.

RESULTS

Mice received 80 Gy per 100 microCi of 90Y-labeled IgM and 110 Gy per 100 microCi of 90Y-aggregate. All tumors treated with 90Y-labeled IgM responded. In mice that received > or = 100 microCi, tumors macroscopically disappeared within three weeks from treatment with seventy-six percent tumor-free at 216 days. Acute toxicities associated with high activity 90Y-labeled IgM and 90Y-aggregate were moist skin desquamation and reduced blood counts. Late radiation damage to connective tissue was observed in mice treated with > 100 microCi of 90Y-labeled IgM.

CONCLUSIONS

Intralesional administration of 90Y-labeled IgM can ablate tumors in nude mice with modest acute or late toxicity. Further development of this modality for loco-regional therapy is warranted.

Risk factors for local-regional recurrence following preoperative radiation therapy and surgery for head and neck cancer (stage II-IVB)

PURPOSE

To discover possible risk factors for local-regional recurrence (LRR) following preoperative radiation therapy and curative surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (stage II-IVB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical records from 1987 to 1999 of 161 patients with head and neck SCC (oral cavity, 80 patients; larynx, 50; hypopharynx, 19; oropharynx, 12) who underwent preoperative radiation therapy and surgery were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred thirty-two (82%) of the patients had stage III or IV cancer. The median radiation dose was 38 Gy.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate and LRR rate were 58% and 35%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, oral cavity cancer (P =.020), clinical T stage (P =.016), clinical N stage (P =.017), and status of surgical margins (P =.008) emerged as variables that were significantly associated with LRR. The analysis of only those patients with lymph node involvement showed that oral cavity cancer (P =.008), advanced N-stage cancer (P =.045), and long interval between the start of preoperative radiation therapy and surgery (> or =7 weeks) (P =.019) emerged as variables that were significantly associated with LRR.

CONCLUSION

Oral cavity cancer, advanced T or N stage of disease, and unsatisfactory margins were risk factors for LRR. A long interval (> or =7 weeks) was a risk factor for LRR in patients with lymph node involvement.

The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma

The prime objective of tumour ablation in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the removal, with a 'margin' of normal tissue, of the whole tumour. Definition of what constitutes margin involvement varies. This study aims to examine the factors associated with close and involved surgical margins in the management of OSCC. A cohort of 200 consecutive patients with previously untreated OSCC provided the material for the study. Various clinical, operative and pathological parameters were related to the status of the surgical margin, as well as time to recurrence, and survival. Cox regression analysis of the survival was also undertaken. Of the 200 patients 107 (53.5%) had clear margins, 84 (42%) close and 9 (4.5%) involved. Poor correlation was found between the status of the surgical margin and clinical factors, but in contrast high correlation between histological indicators of aggressive disease and close or involved surgical margins. These results imply that close surgical margins in OSCC could be regarded as an indictor of aggressive disease.

Oral cancer treatment

Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and it continues to represent a serious public health problem. Oral cancer is a preventable disease, related to behavioral and lifestyle factors, including tobacco and alcohol. Prevention and early detection of oral cancer remain the goals of national efforts to reduce the impact of this disease on the public. Surgical treatment is the mainstay of therapy for patients with oral cancer, particularly in advanced stages of cancer. External beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy have been used successfully as the primary modality for treating patients with early stage oral cancer, and they are the standard of care for use as adjuvant therapy in postoperative cases of patients with advanced stage oral cancer. There is an emerging trend for the use of chemotherapy in combination with radiation therapy and surgery for patients with advanced, recurrent, and metastatic head and neck cancer, although evidence is limited regarding survival benefit when used for treating patients with oral cavity carcinoma. Any report on the treatment of oral cancer is incomplete without consideration of functional and aesthetic outcomes, particularly addressing speech, swallowing, masticatory efficiency, and dental rehabilitation. Future generations will continue to fight these dreadful diseases until scientists and clinicians are provided the opportunities to expand efforts to prevent, detect (early), and eradicate oral and other head and neck cancers.

Postoperative brachytherapy alone for T1-2 N0 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral tongue and floor of mouth with close or positive margins

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative brachytherapy alone (brachy) for Stage T1-2 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the floor of mouth (FM) and the oral tongue (OT) with close or positive margins.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1979 and 1993, 36 patients with T1-2 N0 (24 T1, 12 T2) OT (19), and FOM (17) SCC with close or positive margins following surgery underwent postoperative brachy. Mean patient age was 56 years (range 37-81) and sex ratio was 3.5:1 male:female. Mean surgery to brachy interval was 36 days (range 16-68). The technique used was interstitial Iridium-192 ((192)Ir) brachytherapy with plastic tubes and manual afterloading. Mean total dose was 60 Gy (range 50-67.4) at a mean dose rate of 0.64 Gy/h (range 0.32-0.94). Mean patient follow-up was 80 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial overall and cause-specific survivals of the entire group were 75% and 85%, respectively. The local control was 88.5% at 2 years, with a plateau apparent after 23 months. Of the 4 local relapses, 2 were salvaged with surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBR). No tumor or treatment factors, including tumor size, margin status, disease site, or radiation dose, were correlated with local control. The 2 head and neck second primaries underwent curative treatment on nonirradiated tissue. One patient developed a grade 3 sequelae (bone and soft tissue necrosis). Grade 2-3 chronic sequelae were seen in 7 of 17 and 3 of 19 FOM and OT tumors, respectively (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative brachy is a promising approach in T1-2 N0 OT and FOM SCC with close or positive margins. This approach is associated with high rate of locoregional control and low risk of chronic sequelae, obviates major surgery, avoids potential sequelae of EBR (xerostomia, dysgueusia, fibrosis), and avoids treatment of second head and neck primary on nonirradiated tissues.

The influence of the radicality of resection and dose of postoperative radiation therapy on local control and survival in carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract

PURPOSE

To evaluate dose concepts in postoperative irradiation of carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract according to the radicality of resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, the charts of 257 patients with histologically-proven carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract (40 T1, 80 T2, 53 T3, 84 T4 tumors, with nodal involvement in 181 cases) were reviewed according to the radicality of resection and dose of irradiation administered. Sixty-four patients had tumor-free resection margins (> 3 mm), 66 patients had close resection margins (< 3 mm), and 101 patients had R1 resections, and 26 patients had R2 resections. A median dose of 56 Gy was applied to the primary tumor bed and the cervical lymphatics (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week). In cases of R1 or R2 resection, or of close margins (< 3 mm), the tumor bed or, respectively, tumor residuals were boosted with doses up to a median of 66 Gy. Locoregional tumor control and survival was investigated by uni- and multivariate analyses according to T-, N-stage, grade of resection, total dose of radiation, and presence or absence of extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa.

RESULTS

An overall 3- and 5-year survival rate of 60% and 45%, respectively, was achieved. Rates for freedom from locoregional recurrence were 77% and 72% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. The survival rates according to the grade of resection at 5 years were 67% for patients resected with tumor-free margins, 59% for patients resected with close margins, 26% for patients with R1 resection, and 27% for patients with R2 resection. Within a median follow-up period of 4.7 years for living patients, a total of 67 recurrences (26%) were observed (in 9% of patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 27% with close margins, in 37% of R1 resected, and in 19% of R2 resected patients). Freedom from locoregional recurrence at 3 years was achieved in 100% of the patients resected with tumor-free margins, in 92% of patients resected with close surgical margins, in 87% of R1 and 69% of R2 resected patients. In multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the variables grade of resection (p = 0.00031) and total dose of irradiation (p = 0.0046) were found as factors influencing locoregional control. Variables influencing survival according to multivariate analysis are T-stage (p = 0.0057), N-stage (p = 0.024), grade of resection (p = 0.000015), total dose of irradiation (p < 0. 000000). Extracapsular tumor spread and lymphangiosis carcinomatosa are factors of borderline significance (p = 0.055, p = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

In postoperative radiotherapy of head and neck carcinomas, doses adapted to the risk of locoregional recurrent disease should be applied. Patients with R1 and R2 resections should be treated with doses of more than 68 Gy (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week) (with close margins [< 3 mm] more than 66 Gy) to achieve an improvement in locoregional control and survival.

Laryngeal long-term morbidity after supraglottic laryngectomy and postoperative radiation therapy

PURPOSE

This study was performed to investigate factors associated with laryngeal morbidity when postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is added to supraglottic laryngectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1980 to 1994, 56 patients affected with T1 to 4 N0 to 2c supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma selected for standard (59%) or extended (41%) supraglottic laryngectomy at 2 different institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Most of the patients (91%) also underwent neck dissection. Approximately 80% of the patients had stage T4 primary lesions or N2 neck disease. Postoperative RT was added for presumed microscopic disease at the primary site (13 patients), regional nodes (23 patients), or both (20 patients). Median delivered doses to the larynx and to the neck were 50 Gy (range, 40 to 64 Gy) and 46 Gy (range, 40 to 64 Gy), respectively. Median follow-up for living patients is 11 years (range, 2.8 to 16.9 years). Laryngeal complication was defined as the appearance of grade 2 or higher toxicity according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scoring systems.

RESULTS

Two- and 5-year actuarial locoregional control rates were 85+/-5% and 83+/-5%, respectively. Thirty patients (54%) developed laryngeal complications. However, just one patient experienced grade 4 laryngeal oedema requiring permanent tracheostomy. Estimated actuarial survival without laryngeal complications were 50+/-7%, 43+/-7%, and 39+/-7% at 2, 5, and 10 years, respectively. At univariate analysis, treated volumes (P = .03) and total dose to the larynx (P = .03) were significantly associated with local toxicity. A trend was observed also for the maximum dose to the neck (P = .06) and dose per fraction (P = .09). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed total dose to the larynx to be the only independent predictor of toxicity (P = .03). The hazard ratio of laryngeal toxicity was 2.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.1/4.6), for a total dose to the larynx greater than 50 Gy.

CONCLUSION

After supraglottic laryngectomy, postoperative RT to the neck does not affect local morbidity, but careful RT treatment planning is necessary to avoid delivering a total dose to the larynx greater than 50 Gy.

Early wound complications in advanced head and neck cancer treated with surgery and Ir 192 brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

Brachytherapy, either as primary or adjuvant therapy, is increasingly used to treat head and neck cancer. Reports of complications from the use of brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy to surgical excision have been limited and primarily follow Iodine 125 (I125) therapy. Early complications include wound breakdown, infection, flap failure, and sepsis, and late complications may include osteoradionecrosis, bone marrow suppression, or carotid injuries. The authors sought to identify the early wound complications that follow adjuvant interstitial brachytherapy with iridium 192 (IrS92).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of all patients receiving adjuvant brachytherapy at a tertiary medical center over a 4-year period.

METHODS

Nine patients receiving Ir192 brachytherapy via afterloading catheters placed during surgical resection for close or microscopically positive margin control were evaluated. It was used during primary therapy in six patients and at salvage surgery in three. Early complications were defined as those occurring within 6 weeks of surgical therapy.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 55% (5/9), and included significant wound breakdown in two patients, minor wound dehiscence in three, and wound infection, bacteremia, and local tissue erosion in one patient each. All complications occurred in patients receiving flap reconstruction and one patient required further surgery to manage the complication. Complication rates were not associated with patient age, site, prior radiotherapy, timing of therapy, number of catheters, or dosimetry.

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively high complication rate is acceptable, given the minor nature of most and the potential benefit of radiotherapy. Further study should be undertaken to identify those patients who will achieve maximum therapeutic benefit without prohibitive local complications.

Brachytherapy in cancer of the head and neck

This article provides a review of the general principles of brachytherapy for tumors in the head and neck. The different radionuclides used for this technique are discussed, as are the different capacities in which brachytherapy can be used, such as intraoperatively, as an adjuvant to surgery, to control nasopharyngeal carcinoma, following chemoradiotherapy, and for management of recurrent cancers.