Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on complication and control probabilities

Hypofractionated proton therapy for benign tumors of the central nervous system: A systematic review of the literature

AIMS

Aim of the present analysis was to report results of a systematic review of the literature in the setting of patients treated with hypoF PT for benign lesions of the central nervous system (CNS).

METHODS

The methodology complied with the PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases were interrogated in September 2022.

RESULTS

Twelve papers have been selected including patients treated for base of the skull meningiomas (6 papers), vestibular schwannoma (3 papers) and pituitary adenomas (3 papers). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with both radiologic images and clinical parameters. Long-term toxicity was reported in all but one series with an incidence ranging from 2 % to 7 % in patients treated for base of skull meningioma and 1-9 % for schwannoma.

CONCLUSIONS

HypoF PT is a safe and effective treatment in selected benign tumors of the CNS. Further dosimetric and clinical comparisons are required to better refine the patients' selection criteria.

Redefine the Role of Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for the Single Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

To explore the role of using Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) proton beam therapy in single lesion brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we developed and validated a dosimetric in silico model to assist in the selection of an optimal treatment approach among the conventional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Spot-scanning Proton Arc (SPArc).

Material and Methods

A patient’s head CT data set was used as an in silico model. A series of targets (volume range from 0.3 cc to 33.03 cc) were inserted in the deep central and peripheral region, simulating targets with different sizes and locations. Three planning groups: IMPT, VMAT, and SPArc were created for dosimetric comparison purposes and a decision tree was built based on this in silico model. Nine patients with single brain metastases were retrospectively selected for validation. Multiple dosimetric metrics were analyzed to assess the plan quality, such as dose Conformity Index (CI) (ratio of the target volume to 100% prescription isodose volume); R50 (ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to the target volume); V_12Gy (volume of brain tissue minus GTV receiving 12 Gy), and mean dose of the normal brain. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of brain radionecrosis (RN) was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model and total treatment delivery time was calculated. Six physicians from different institutions participated in the blind survey to evaluate the plan quality and rank their choices.

Results

The study showed that SPArc has a dosimetric advantage in the V_12Gy and R50 with target volumes > 9.00 cc compared to VMAT and IMPT. A significant clinical benefit can be found in deep centrally located lesions larger than 20.00 cc using SPArc because of the superior dose conformity and mean dose reduction in healthy brain tissue. Nine retrospective clinical cases and the blind survey showed good agreement with the in silico dosimetric model and decision tree. Additionally, SPArc significantly reduced the treatment delivery time compared to VMAT (SPArc 184.46 ± 59.51s vs. VMAT: 1574.78 ± 213.65s).

Conclusion

The study demonstrated the feasibility of using Proton beam therapy for single brain metastasis patients utilizing the SPArc technique. At the current stage of technological development, VMAT remains the current standard modality of choice for single lesion brain SRS. The in silico dosimetric model and decision tree presented here could be used as a practical clinical decision tool to assist the selection of the optimal treatment modality among VMAT, IMPT, and SPArc in centers that have both photon and proton capabilities.

Clinical outcome after particle therapy for meningiomas of the skull base: toxicity and local control in patients treated with active rasterscanning

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas of the skull base account for 25-30% of all meningiomas. Due to the complex structure of the cranial base and its close proximity to critical structures, surgery is often associated with substantial morbidity. Treatment options include observation, aggressive surgical intervention, stereotactic or conventional radiotherapy. In this analysis we evaluate the outcome of 110 patients with meningiomas of the skull base treated with particle therapy. It was performed within the framework of the "clinical research group heavy ion therapy" and supported by the German Research Council (DFG, KFO 214).

METHODS

Between May 2010 and November 2014, 110 Patients with skull base meningioma were treated with particle radiotherapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT). Primary localizations included the sphenoid wing (n = 42), petroclival region (n = 23), cavernous sinus (n = 4), sella (n = 10) and olfactory nerve (n = 4). Sixty meningiomas were benign (WHO °I); whereas 8 were high-risk (WHO °II (n = 7) and °III (n = 1)). In 42 cases histology was not examined, since no surgery was performed. Proton (n = 104) or carbon ion (n = 6) radiotherapy was applied at Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT) using raster-scanning technique for active beam delivery. Fifty one patients (46.4%) received radiotherapy due to tumor progression, 17 (15.5%) after surgical resection and 42 (38.2%) as primary treatment.

RESULTS

Median follow-up in this analysis was 46,8 months (95% CI 39,9-53,7; Q1-Q3 34,3-61,7). Particle radiotherapy could be performed safely without toxicity-related interruptions. No grade IV or V toxicities according to CTCAE v4.0 were observed. Particle RT offered excellent overall local control rates with 100% progression-free survival (PFS) after 36 months and 96.6% after 60 months. Median PFS was not reached due to the small number of events. Histology significantly impacted PFS with superior PFS after 5 years for low-risk tumors (96.6% vs. 75.0%, p = 0,02). Overall survival was 96.2% after 60 months and 92.0% after 72 months from therapy. Of six documented deaths, five were definitely not and the sixth probably not meningioma-related.

CONCLUSION

Particle radiotherapy is an excellent treatment option for patients with meningiomas of the skull base and can lead to long-term tumor control with minimal side effects. Other prospective studies with longer follow-up will be necessary to further confirm the role of particle radiotherapy in skull base meningioma.

Clinical Applications of Proton Radiation Treatment at Loma Linda University: Review of a Fifteen-year Experience

Proton radiation therapy has been used at Loma Linda University Medical Center for 15 years, sometimes in combination with photon irradiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, but often as the sole modality. Our initial experience was based on established studies showing the utility of protons for certain management problems, but since then we have engaged in a planned program to exploit the capabilities of proton radiation and expand its applications in accordance with progressively accumulating clinical data. Our cumulative experience has confirmed that protons are a superb tool for delivering conformal radiation treatments, enabling delivery of effective doses of radiation and sparing normal tissues from radiation exposure.

Intensity-Modulated Radiosurgery: Improving Dose Gradients and Maximum Dose Using Post Inverse-Optimization Interactive Dose Shaping

Intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) for brain metastases and arterio-venous malformations (AVM) using a serial tomotherapy system (Nomos Corp., Cranberry Township, PA) has been delivered in >150 cases over the last 5 years. A new software tool provided within the Corvus inverse planning software (ActiveRx) allows for post inverse planning re-optimization and individualization of the dose distribution. We analyzed this tool with respect to increasing the steepness of the dose gradient and in-target dose inhomogeneity while maintaining conformity. Fifteen clinically delivered IMRS plans for solitary brain metastases provided the basis for this analysis. The clinical IMRS plans were copied and the ActiveRx module was opened. The toolset in ActiveRx includes a hot spot eraser, a pencil tool to redefine isodose lines and a drag and drop tool, allowing reshaping of existing isodose lines. To assess changes in the steepness of the dose gradient and dose homogeneity, the 100%, 90%, 50% and 25% isodose volume, the volume of the target, maximum dose and mean dose to the target were recorded. We also recorded total monitor units and calculated treatment delivery times. Target volumes ranged from 0.6 to 14.1 cm3 (mean/median 3.9/1.8 cm3). Mean RTOG conformity index (CI) of plans clinically delivered was 1.23±0.31; mean homogeneity index (HI) was 115±5%. After using the ActiveRx tool-set, the mean CI was slightly improved to 1.14±0.1, with an associated increase in HI to 141±10%. The average, respective Ian Paddick CI for the 100%, 90% 50% and 25% isodose lines were 0.79 vs. 0.83, 0.44 vs. 0.59, 0.12 vs. 0.19, and 0.04 vs. 0.07, representing significant improvements after using ActiveRx post-optimization. Total MU were reduced by a mean of 12.3% using ActiveRx, shortening estimated treatment delivery times by 3.2 minutes on average. A post inverse planning optimization tool for IMRS plans allowed for statistically significant improvements in the steepness of the dose gradient, and increased maximum and mean target doses compared to clinically delivered plans that were already considered excellent. Gains were especially pronounced in the reduction of normal brain tissue included into the 90%, and 50% isodose lines. We have since made this process part of the clinical routine for all cranial IMRS procedures.

Impact of spot size on plan quality of spot scanning proton radiosurgery for peripheral brain lesions

PURPOSE

To determine the plan quality of proton spot scanning (SS) radiosurgery as a function of spot size (in-air sigma) in comparison to x-ray radiosurgery for treating peripheral brain lesions.

METHODS

Single-field optimized (SFO) proton SS plans with sigma ranging from 1 to 8 mm, cone-based x-ray radiosurgery (Cone), and x-ray volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated for 11 patients. Plans were evaluated using secondary cancer risk and brain necrosis normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

RESULTS

For all patients, secondary cancer is a negligible risk compared to brain necrosis NTCP. Secondary cancer risk was lower in proton SS plans than in photon plans regardless of spot size (p = 0.001). Brain necrosis NTCP increased monotonically from an average of 2.34/100 (range 0.42/100-4.49/100) to 6.05/100 (range 1.38/100-11.6/100) as sigma increased from 1 to 8 mm, compared to the average of 6.01/100 (range 0.82/100-11.5/100) for Cone and 5.22/100 (range 1.37/100-8.00/100) for VMAT. An in-air sigma less than 4.3 mm was required for proton SS plans to reduce NTCP over photon techniques for the cohort of patients studied with statistical significance (p = 0.0186). Proton SS plans with in-air sigma larger than 7.1 mm had significantly greater brain necrosis NTCP than photon techniques (p = 0.0322).

CONCLUSIONS

For treating peripheral brain lesions--where proton therapy would be expected to have the greatest depth-dose advantage over photon therapy--the lateral penumbra strongly impacts the SS plan quality relative to photon techniques: proton beamlet sigma at patient surface must be small (<7.1 mm for three-beam single-field optimized SS plans) in order to achieve comparable or smaller brain necrosis NTCP relative to photon radiosurgery techniques. Achieving such small in-air sigma values at low energy (<70 MeV) is a major technological challenge in commercially available proton therapy systems.

Radiosurgery with photons or protons for benign and malignant tumours of the skull base: a review

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important treatment option for intracranial lesions. Many studies have shown the effectiveness of photon-SRS for the treatment of skull base (SB) tumours; however, limited data are available for proton-SRS.Several photon-SRS techniques, including Gamma Knife, modified linear accelerators (Linac) and CyberKnife, have been developed and several studies have compared treatment plan characteristics between protons and photons.The principles of classical radiobiology are similar for protons and photons even though they differ in terms of physical properties and interaction with matter resulting in different dose distributions.Protons have special characteristics that allow normal tissues to be spared better than with the use of photons, although their potential clinical superiority remains to be demonstrated.A critical analysis of the fundamental radiobiological principles, dosimetric characteristics, clinical results, and toxicity of proton- and photon-SRS for SB tumours is provided and discussed with an attempt of defining the advantages and limits of each radiosurgical technique.

Dynamic conformal arc cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: implications of multileaf collimator margin on dose-volume metrics

OBJECTIVE

The effect of multileaf collimator (MLC) margin on target and normal tissue dose-volume metrics for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was assessed.

METHODS

118 intracranial lesions of 83 SRS patients formed the basis of this study. For each planning target volume (PTV), five separate treatment plans were generated with MLC margins of -1, 0, 1, 2 and 3 mm, respectively. Identical treatment planning parameters were employed with a median of five dynamic conformal arcs using the Varian/BrainLab high-definition MLC for beam shaping. Prescription dose (PD) was such that 22 Gy covered at least 95% of the PTV. Dose-volume and dose-response comparative metrics included conformity index, heterogeneity index, dose gradient, tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

RESULTS

Target dose heterogeneity decreased with increasing MLC margin (p<0.001); mean heterogeneity index decreased from 70.4 ± 12.7 to 10.4 ± 2.2%. TCP decreased with increasing MLC margin (p<0.001); mean TCP decreased from 81.0 ± 2.3 to 62.2 ± 1.8%. Normal tissue dose fall-off increased with MLC margin (p<0.001); mean gradient increased from 3.1 ± 0.9 mm to 5.3 ± 0.7 mm. NTCP was optimal at 1 mm MLC margin. No unambiguous correlation was observed between NTCP and PTV volume. Plan delivery efficiency generally improved with larger margins (p<0.001); mean monitor unit per centigray of the PD decreased from 3.60 ± 1.30 to 1.56 ± 0.13. Conclusion Use of 1 mm MLC margins for dynamic conformal arc-based cranial radiosurgery resulted in optimal tumour control and normal tissue sparing. Clinical significance of these comparative findings warrants further investigation.

Radiosurgery for movement disorders

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been proposed as an alternative treatment modality to pharmaceutical administration and deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients suffering from movement disorders. Advanced neuroimaging is required for the identification of the functional structures and the accurate placement of the SRS lesion within the brain. Atlas-based techniques have also been used to aid delineation of the target during treatment planning. Maximum doses greater than 120 Gy have been suggested for controlling movement disorders. These high delivered doses and the irreversible character of SRS require accurate placement of the created lesions. In this article, achievements in the field of stereotactic radiosurgery, neuroimaging, and radiosurgical dose planning are reviewed, and an overview is provided of the clinical experience obtained to date in the radiosurgical treatment of movement disorders.

Dosimetric performance of the new high-definition multileaf collimator for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery

The objective was to evaluate the performance of a high-definition multileaf collimator (MLC) of 2.5 mm leaf width (MLC2.5) and compare to standard 5 mm leaf width MLC (MLC5) for the treatment of intracranial lesions using dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) technique with a dedicated radiosurgery linear accelerator. Simulated cases of spherical targets were created to study solely the effect of target volume size on the performance of the two MLC systems independent of target shape complexity. In addition, 43 patients previously treated for intracranial lesions in our institution were retrospectively planned using DCA technique with MLC2.5 and MLC5 systems. The gross tumor volume ranged from 0.07 to 40.57 cm3 with an average volume of 5.9 cm3. All treatment parameters were kept the same for both MLC-based plans. The plan evaluation was performed using figures of merits (FOM) for a rapid and objective assessment on the quality of the two treatment plans for MLC2.5 and MLC5. The prescription isodose surface was selected as the greatest isodose surface covering >or= 95% of the target volume and delivering 95% of the prescription dose to 99% of target volume. A Conformity Index (CI) and conformity distance index (CDI) were used to quantifying the dose conformity to a target volume. To assess normal tissue sparing, a normal tissue difference (NTD) was defined as the difference between the volume of normal tissue receiving a certain dose utilizing MLC5 and the volume receiving the same dose using MLC2.5. The CI and normal tissue sparing for the simulated spherical targets were better with the MLC2.5 as compared to MLC5. For the clinical patients, the CI and CDI results indicated that the MLC2.5 provides better treatment conformity than MLC5 even at large target volumes. The CI's range was 1.15 to 2.44 with a median of 1.59 for MLC2.5 compared to 1.60-2.85 with a median of 1.71 for MLC5. Improved normal tissue sparing was also observed for MLC2.5 over MLC5, with the NTD always positive, indicating improvement, and ranging from 0.1 to 8.3 for normal tissue receiving 50% (NTV50), 70% (NTV70) and 90% (NTV90) of the prescription dose. The MLC2.5 has a dosimetric advantage over the MLC5 in Linac-based radiosurgery using DCA method for intracranial lesions, both in treatment conformity and normal tissue sparing when target shape complexity increases.

The place of interstitial brachytherapy and radiosurgery for low-grade gliomas

Even though stereotactic brachytherapy has been used for treatment of complex located low-grade glioma for many years, its place within modern treatment concepts is still debated and only a few centers have gained experience with this complex treatment modality. The current article reviews selection criteria, treatment protocols, radiobiology, treatment effects, risk models and side effects of stereotactic brachytherapy. Potentially alternative techniques such as radiosurgery were also reviewed under consideration of radiobiological similarities and differences.

Effect of composite sector collimation on average dose fall-off for Gamma Knife Perfexion

OBJECT

The new capability of composite sector collimation in Gamma Knife Perfexion produces complex, nonspherical, and nonelliptical dose distributions. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of composite sector collimation on average dose fall-off compared with the previous Gamma Knife model.

METHODS

A general formalism was derived to describe the peripheral dose distribution of all Gamma Knife models in the form of (V/V(0)) = (D/D(0))(gamma), where V is the volume of the peripheral isodose line with the value of D, V(0) is the reference prescription isodose volume, D(0) is the prescription dose, and gamma is the fitting parameter that determines how fast the dose falls off near the target. Based on this formula, the authors compared 40 cases involving patients treated with Gamma Knife Perfexion with 40 similar cases involving patients treated with Gamma Knife model 4C. The cases were grouped based on the use of the sector collimators in the treatment planning process. For each group as well as all cases combined, the mean gamma values were compared by means of the Student t-test for varying ranges of the peripheral dose distribution-from 100% of the prescription dose to 75, 50, and 25% of the prescription dose.

RESULTS

The fit of general formula to the data was excellent for both Gamma Knife Perfexion and Gamma Knife 4C with R(2)> 0.99 for all the cases. The overall gamma values (mean +/- 2 standard deviations) were as follows: gamma = -1.74 +/- 0.47 (Model 4C) versus -1.77 +/- 0.40 (Perfexion) within 100-75% of the prescription dose; gamma = -1.57 +/- 0.26 (Model 4C) versus -1.58 +/- 0.25 (Perfexion) within 100-50% of the prescription dose; gamma = -1.47 +/- 0.18 (Model 4C) versus -1.50 +/- 0.16 (Perfexion) within 100-25% of the prescription dose. No statistical significance between the mean differences for Gamma Knife Perfexion and Model 4C was found within these ranges. The probability values were 0.65, 0.84, and 0.22, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of composite sector collimators in Gamma Knife Perfexion demonstrated no statistically significant effects on the volume-averaged dose fall-off near a target periphery for typical treatment cases.

Long-term results of stereotactic proton beam radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A retrospective study evaluating the role of hypofractionated stereotactic proton beam therapy for acoustic neuromas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 51 patients treated with hypofractionation (3 fractions) and followed up for a minimum of 2 years, were analyzed. Mean dose prescribed to ICRU reference point (isocenter) was 26 cobalt gray equivalent (CGyE) in 3 fractions. Mean minimum tumor dose was 21.4 CGyE/3. Cranial nerve functions were evaluated clinically. Serial MR Scans were used to evaluate local control.

RESULTS

With a mean clinical and radiological follow-up of 72 and 60 months respectively, the 5-year results showed a 98% local control, with a hearing preservation of 42%, a facial nerve preservation of 90.5% and a trigeminal nerve preservation of 93%.

CONCLUSION

For those patients harboring large acoustic neuromas that are inoperable, hypofractionated stereotactic proton beam offers long-term control with minimal side-effects.

Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumours: a planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc and fixed gantry techniques

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The potential benefits and limitations of the new RapidArc treatment concept compared to Helical Tomotherapy and fixed gantry intensity modulation techniques have been assessed at treatment planning level on 12 patients presenting with 'benign' brain tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plans for five acoustic neurinomas, five meningiomas and two pituitary adenomas were computed for an Helical Tomotherapy (HT) unit, for RapidArc delivery (RA) on a linac equipped with two types of MLC (RA_HD120 with the new High Definition MLC with 2.5mm leaf width at isocentre and RA_M120 with the standard Millennium with 5mm resolution) and for fixed beam IMRT with the High Definition MLC. Analysis was mostly performed on physical quantities derived from Dose-Volume Histograms (DVHs).

RESULTS

Target coverage resulted basically equivalent among techniques. V(95%) (in %) was higher than 99% for all techniques, minimum significant dose (D(99%)) was 95.5+/-1.4 for IMRT, 96.2+/-1.4 and 97.0+/-1.2 for the RA_HD120 and RA_M120 approaches and 96.8+/-1.7 for HT, maximum significant dose (D(1%), in %) was 102.2+/-0.8, 102.7+/-0.5, 102.4+/-0.5 and 103.0+/-1.1, respectively, standard deviation (in %) was 1.4+/-0.4, 1.3+/-0.3, 1.1+/-0.2 and 0.8+/-0.3, respectively. Conformity Index (CI(95%)) was 0.47+/-0.12, 0.46+/-0.12, 0.43+/-0.11 and 0.38+/-0.11, respectively. For organs at risk all techniques respected planning objectives. Concerning the healthy tissue: V(10 Gy) (in %) was 9.4+/-5.5, 9.9+/-6.1, 9.2+/-6.1 and 12.1+/-8.8, respectively. Integral dose measured on the healthy tissue was 7.5+/-3.3, 9.7+/-3.4, 8.7+/-3.4, 10.4+/-4.2 10(3) Gy cm(3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For the class of tumours investigated in this report, HT and RA and IMRT proved to be adequate to properly treat patients. Further studies on more complex cases need to be investigated in order to assess the effectiveness of this new technique in a broader clinical perspective.

Conformity of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic conformal arcs and micro-multileaf collimator

PURPOSE

To assess the conformity of dynamic conformal arc linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery and to describe a standardized method of isodose surface (IDS) selection.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 174 targets, the conformity index (CI) at the prescription IDS used for treatment was calculated as CI = (PIV/PVTV)/(PVTV/TV), where TV is the target volume, PIV (prescription isodose volume) is the total volume encompassed by the prescription IDS, and PVTV is the TV encompassed by the IDS. In addition, a "standardized" prescription IDS (sIDS) was chosen according to the following criteria: 95% of the TV was encompassed by the PIV and 99% of TV was covered by 95% of the prescription dose. The CIs at the sIDS were also calculated.

RESULTS

The median CI at the prescription IDS and sIDS was 1.63 and 1.47, respectively (p < 0.001). In 132 of 174 cases, the volume of normal tissue in the PIV was reduced by the prescription to the sIDS compared with the prescription IDS, in 20 cases it remained unchanged, and in 22 cases it was increased.

CONCLUSION

The CIs obtained with linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery are comparable to those previously reported for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Using a uniform method to select the sIDS, adequate target coverage was usually achievable with prescription to an IDS greater than that chosen by the treating physician (prescription IDS), providing sparing of normal tissue. Thus, the sIDS might aid physicians in identifying a prescription IDS that balances coverage and conformity.

DVHs evaluation in brain metastases stereotactic radiotherapy treatment plans

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to report a retrospective study of radiobiological indicators based on Dose-Volume Histograms analysis obtained by stereotactic radiotherapy treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-five patients for a total of sixty-seven brain metastases with a mean target volume of 8.49 cc were treated by Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy (DCAT) and Intensity-Modulated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (IMRST). The Delivered prescription dose was chosen on the basis of tumor size and location so as to ensure a 100% isodose coverage to the target volume.

RESULTS

The treatment plans reported a mean value of 10% and 2.19% for the inhomogeneity and conformal index, respectively. The F factor showed we overdosed sixty-three patients delivering an additional 7% dose more than calculated values. The radiobiological parameters: TCP and NTCP showed a complete tumor control limiting the organs at risk damage.

CONCLUSION

One goal of stereotactic radiotherapy is to design a treatment plan in which the steep dose gradient achievable minimizes the amount of radiation delivered outside the tumor region. This technique allows to deliver a much larger dose to the target without exceeding the radiation-related tolerance of normal tissues and improving patients' quality of life.

Impact of target point deviations on control and complication probabilities in stereotactic radiosurgery of AVMs and metastases

OBJECTIVE

Determination of the impact of inaccuracies in the determination and setup of the target point in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on the expectable complication and control probabilities.

METHODS

Two randomized samples of patients with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) (n=20) and with brain metastases (n=20) treated with SRS were formed, and the probability for complete obliteration (COP) or complete remission (CRP), the size of the 10 Gy-volume in the brain tissue (VOI10), and the probability for radiation necrosis (NTCP) were calculated. The dose-effect relations for COP and CRP were fitted to clinical data. Target point deviations were simulated through random vectors and the resulting probabilities and volumes were calculated and compared with the values of the treatment plan.

RESULTS

The decrease of the relative value of the control probabilities at 1mm target point deviation was up to 4% for AVMs and up to 10% for metastases. At 2 mm the median decrease was 5% for AVMs and 9% for metastases. The value for the target point deviation, at which COP and CRP decreased about 0.05 in 90% of the cases, was 1.3 mm. The increase of NTCP was maximally 0.0025 per mm target point deviation for AVMs and 0.0035/mm for metastases. The maximal increase of VOI10 was 0.7 cm(3)/mm target point deviation in both patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The upper limit for tolerable target point deviations is at 1.3mm. If this value cannot be achieved during the system test, a supplementary safety margin should be applied for the definition of the target volume. A better accuracy level is desirable, in order to ensure optimal chances for the success of the treatment. The target point precision is less important for the minimization of the probability of radiation necroses.

Comparison of (125)I stereotactic brachytherapy and LINAC radiosurgery modalities based on physical dose distribution and radiobiological efficacy

The goal of this study was to make a comparison between stereotactic brachytherapy implants and linear accelerator-based radiosurgery of brain tumors with respect to physical dose distributions and radiobiological efficacy. Twenty-four treatment plans made for irradiation of brain tumors with low-dose-rate (125)I brachytherapy and multiple-arc LINAC-based radiosurgery were analyzed. Using the dose-volume histograms and the linear-quadratic model, the brachytherapy doses were compared to the brachytherapy-equivalent LINAC radiosurgery doses with respect to the predicted late effects of radiation on normal brain tissue. To characterize the conformity and homogeneity of dose distributions, the conformal index, external volume index, and relative homogeneity index were calculated for each dose plan and the mean values were compared. The average tumor volume was 5.6 cm(3) (range: 0.1-19.3 cm(3)). At low doses, the calculated radiobiological late effect on normal tissue was equivalent for external-beam and brachytherapy dose delivery. For brachytherapy at doses greater than 30 Gy, the calculated equivalent dose to normal tissues was less than for external-beam radiosurgery. However, the dose-calculated homogeneity was better for the LINAC radiosurgery, with a mean relative homogeneity index of 0.62 compared to the calculated value of 0.19 for the brachytherapy (P=0.0002). These results are only predictions based on calculations concerning normal tissue tolerance. More data and research are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings.

Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate dose conformity, dose homogeneity, and dose gradient in helical tomotherapy treatment plans for stereotactic radiosurgery, and compare results with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) treatment plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixteen patients were selected with a mean tumor size of 14.65 +/- 11.2 cm3. Original step-and-shoot IMRS treatment plans used coplanar fields because of the constraint of the beam stopper. Retrospective step-and-shoot IMRS plans were generated using noncoplanar fields. Helical tomotherapy treatment plans were generated using the tomotherapy planning station. Dose conformity index, dose gradient score index, and homogeneity index were used in plan intercomparisons.

RESULTS

Noncoplanar IMRS plans increased dose conformity and dose gradient, but not dose homogeneity, compared with coplanar IMRS plans. Tomotherapy plans increased dose conformity and dose gradient, yet increased dose heterogeneity compared with noncoplanar IMRS plans. The average dose conformity index values were 1.53 +/- 0.38, 1.35 +/- 0.15, and 1.26 +/- 0.10 in coplanar IMRS, noncoplanar IMRS, and tomotherapy plans, respectively. The average dose homogeneity index values were 1.15 +/- 0.05, 1.13 +/- 0.04, and 1.18 +/- 0.09 in coplanar IMRS, noncoplanar IMRS, and tomotherapy plans, respectively. The mean dose gradient score index values were 1.37 +/- 19.08, 22.32 +/- 19.20, and 43.28 +/- 13.78 in coplanar IMRS, noncoplanar IMRS, and tomotherapy plans, respectively. The mean treatment time in tomotherapy was 42 +/- 16 min.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve better dose conformity and dose gradient in tomotherapy plans compared with step-and-shoot IMRS plans for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. However, tomotherapy treatment time was significantly larger than that in step-and-shoot IMRS.

Fractionated Radiotherapy Techniques

A convergence of advances in patient immobilization and localization, patient imaging, beam shaping and delivery, and treatment planning has led to considerable improvement in the ability to deliver highly conformal radiation treatments by radiosurgical or fractionated radiotherapy techniques. The selection of the "best" treatment technique for any given patient needs to consider the morphology of the target and regional organs at risk as well as available technology and institutional expertise.

Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Targets

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a technique for treating intracranial lesions with a high dose of ionizing radiation, usually in a single session, using a stereotactic apparatus for accurate localization and patient immobilization. This article describes several modalities of SRS and some of its applications, particularly for intracranial lesions.

Stereotactic proton beam therapy for intracranial arteriovenous malformations

PURPOSE

To investigate hypofractionated stereotactic proton therapy of predominantly large intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) by analyzing retrospectively the results from a cohort of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Since 1993, a total of 85 patients with vascular lesions have been treated. Of those, 64 patients fulfilled the criteria of having an arteriovenous malformation and sufficient follow-up. The AVMs were grouped by volume: <14 cc (26 patients) and > or =14 cc (38 patients). Treatment was delivered with a fixed horizontal 200 MeV proton beam under stereotactic conditions, using a stereophotogrammetric positioning system. The majority of patients were hypofractionated (2 or 3 fractions), and the proton doses are presented as single-fraction equivalent cobalt Gray equivalent doses (SFEcGyE). The overall mean minimum target volume dose was 17.37 SFEcGyE, ranging from 10.38-22.05 SFEcGyE.

RESULTS

Analysis by volume group showed obliteration in 67% for volumes <14 cc and 43% for volumes > or =14 cc. Grade IV acute complications were observed in 3% of patients. Transient delayed effects were seen in 15 patients (23%), becoming permanent in 3 patients. One patient also developed a cyst 8 years after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic proton beam therapy applied in a hypofractionated schedule allows for the safe treatment of large AVMs, with acceptable results. It is an alternative to other treatment strategies for large AVMs. AVMs are likely not static entities, but probably undergo vascular remodeling. Factors influencing angiogenesis could play a new role in a form of adjuvant therapy to improve on the radiosurgical results.

A simple and reliable index for scoring rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans

PURPOSE

A simple and robust index for ranking rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans is presented.

METHODS

The radiosurgery plan score index, CGI (Conformity/Gradient Index), is an average of a conformity score and a gradient score. Computation of the CGI score is simple, requiring only three pieces of data: (1) the total volume irradiated to the prescription isodose level, (2) the volume of the target, and (3) the total volume irradiated at half of the prescription isodose level. The overall CGI Index is a simple function of these three pieces of data.

RESULTS

When multiple sets of rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans were ranked with respect to this single score index, the resulting plan rankings closely matched the plan rankings according to biologic indices (calculated nontarget brain normal tissue complication probabilities).

CONCLUSIONS

The CGI is a simple and fast plan evaluation tool that can assist the radiosurgery planner in evaluating and optimizing multiple candidate radiosurgery plans.

Dosimetric Comparison of CyberKnife with Other Radiosurgical Modalities for an Ellipsoidal Target

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment plans obtained with the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) with those of other commonly used radiosurgical modalities, such as the gamma knife (GK), linear accelerator multiple arcs, conformally shaped static fields, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

An ellipsoidal simulated target was chosen centrally located in a three-dimensional model of a patient's head acquired with magnetic resonance or computed tomographic imaging. It was 25 mm in diameter and 35 mm long. The aims of treatment plans were 100% target volume coverage with an appropriate isodose line, minimum radiation dose to normal tissue, and clinically acceptable delivery. These plans were evaluated by use of a dose-volume histogram and other commonly used radiosurgical parameters such as target coverage, homogeneity index, and conformity index.

RESULTS

All selected treatment modalities were equivalent in providing full target coverage. For dose homogeneity, all modalities except for multiple isocenter plans for GK (homogeneity index, 2.0) were similar (homogeneity index, ≅1.25). Dose conformity was essentially equivalent for all treatment plans except for IMRT, which had a slightly higher value (conformity index, ≅1.27). There was a substantial variation in the radiation dose to normal tissue between the studied modalities, particularly at the lower dose levels.

CONCLUSION

CK plans seemed to be more flexible for a given target size and shape. For a target of limited volume and essentially of any shape, one could obtain similarly good conformal dosimetry with CK and GK. For a regular-shaped but other than spherical target, homogeneous dose distribution could be obtained with all selected modalities except for multiple isocenters, linear accelerator multiple arcs, or GK. Both IMRT and conformally shaped static fields offered good alternative treatment modalities to CK, GK, or linear accelerator multiple arc radiosurgery, with slightly inferior dosimetry in conformity (IMRT).

Estimation of parameters of dose-volume models and their confidence limits

Predictions of the normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the ranking of treatment plans are based on fits of dose-volume models to clinical and/or experimental data. In the literature several different fit methods are used. In this work frequently used methods and techniques to fit NTCP models to dose response data for establishing dose-volume effects, are discussed. The techniques are tested for their usability with dose-volume data and NTCP models. Different methods to estimate the confidence intervals of the model parameters are part of this study. From a critical-volume (CV) model with biologically realistic parameters a primary dataset was generated, serving as the reference for this study and describable by the NTCP model. The CV model was fitted to this dataset. From the resulting parameters and the CV model, 1000 secondary datasets were generated by Monte Carlo simulation. All secondary datasets were fitted to obtain 1000 parameter sets of the CV model. Thus the 'real' spread in fit results due to statistical spreading in the data is obtained and has been compared with estimates of the confidence intervals obtained by different methods applied to the primary dataset. The confidence limits of the parameters of one dataset were estimated using the methods, employing the covariance matrix, the jackknife method and directly from the likelihood landscape. These results were compared with the spread of the parameters, obtained from the secondary parameter sets. For the estimation of confidence intervals on NTCP predictions, three methods were tested. Firstly, propagation of errors using the covariance matrix was used. Secondly, the meaning of the width of a bundle of curves that resulted from parameters that were within the one standard deviation region in the likelihood space was investigated. Thirdly, many parameter sets and their likelihood were used to create a likelihood-weighted probability distribution of the NTCP. It is concluded that for the type of dose response data used here, only a full likelihood analysis will produce reliable results. The often-used approximations, such as the usage of the covariance matrix, produce inconsistent confidence limits on both the parameter sets and the resulting NTCP values.

Radiotherapy of small intracranial tumours with different advanced techniques using photon and proton beams: a treatment planning study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The potential benefits and limitations of five different radiation techniques, 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), stereotactic arc therapy (SRS/T), intensity modulated radiotherapy with photons (IMRT), and radiotherapy with protons (spot scanning (SSp) or passive scattering (PSp)), have been assessed using comparative treatment planning methods in a cohort of patients presenting with 'benign' brain tumours.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Plans for five acoustic neurinomas, five meningiomas, and two pituitary adenomas were computed for all modalities using computed tomography (CT) scans to delineate planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs) and to predict dose distributions. Dose-volume histograms were used for physical and simple biological evaluation.

RESULTS

Proton techniques were shown to be superior to all photon approaches for the irradiation of small brain lesions in terms of target dose uniformity and conformity and in terms of sparing OARs. No major differences were observed between the results of the photon techniques, which were generally good for target coverage. Minimum target doses ranged from 81% with SRS/T to 93% with IMRT. The volume receiving more than 95% of the dose ranged from 95% (SRS/T) to 99% (PSp). No clear patterns of coverage dependence upon target shape were observed. Maximum brain stem irradiation ranged from 60% with IMRT to 26% with protons and the conformity index from 4.4 with IMRT to 2.5 with protons. Considering the rather long life expectancy of the patients suffering from meningiomas, neurinomas, and pituitary adenomas, the most important aspect to be considered, other than target coverage, is toxicity and in the long term, the possibility of secondary tumour induction. Considering these aspects, proton irradiation should be the irradiation technique of choice, when available. If not, IMRT, or even 3DCRT, techniques can provide an acceptable compromise, even without recurring to unconventional treatments like SRS/T, which require complex installations and high machine occupancy.

Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning

PURPOSE

To compare different parameters used to quantify the quality of a treatment plan and to evaluate the dose conformity and coverage clinically achieved using gamma knife radiosurgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Various existing parameters for coverage and conformity are reviewed. Additionally, a modified conformity index (CI) has been defined as the ratio of the volume within the target irradiated to at least the prescription isodose over the total volume enclosed by the prescription isodose. These parameters are calculated for all the 551 evaluable patient treatment plans.

RESULTS

The median CI for all targets is 0.75, with a median target coverage of 94.6%. Regardless of the conformity parameter chosen, the conformity is seen to vary depending on the type of tumor and its location, reflecting the treatment planning philosophy. For tumors with volumes smaller than about 1 cm(3), the conformity parameter is also seen to be dependent on the target volume.

CONCLUSION

With gamma knife radiosurgery, it is possible to achieve highly conformal dose distributions. A single parameter for the quantification of a plan, though desirable, is not realistic, because of the competing components of high dose to the target and low dose to normal tissue. Thus, we propose the use of the CI, together with the target volume coverage.

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiosurgery with gamma knife radiosurgery for challenging skull base lesions

PURPOSE

To quantitatively compare intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) using 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) plans for irregularly shaped skull base lesions in direct proximity to organs at risk (OAR).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten challenging skull base lesions originally treated with GKRS were selected for comparison with IMRS using inverse treatment planning and 3-mm mini-multileaf collimation operating in step-and-shoot delivery mode. The lesions ranged in volume from 1.6 to 32.2 cm(3) and were treated with 9-20 GK isocenters (mean 13.2). The IMRS plans were designed with the intent to, at minimum, match the GKRS plans with regard to OAR sparing and target coverage. For each case, IMRS plans were generated using 9 coplanar, 11 equally spaced noncoplanar, and 11 OAR-avoidant noncoplanar beams; the best of these approaches with respect to target conformality, sparing of OAR, and maintaining coverage was selected for comparison with the original GKRS plan.

RESULTS

Assuming no patient motion or setup error, IMRS provided comparable target coverage and sparing of OAR and an improved conformity index at the prescription isodose contour but sometimes less conformity at lower isodose contours compared with the actual GKRS plan. All IMRS plans produced less target dose heterogeneity and shorter estimated treatment times compared with the GKRS plans.

CONCLUSION

Compared with GKRS for complex skull base lesions, IMRS plans using a 3-mm mini-multileaf collimator achieved comparable or sometimes improved target coverage, conformity, and critical structure sparing with shorter estimated treatment times.

Experimentally determined three-dimensional dose distributions in small complex targets

Object. The purpose of the paper is to describe a workable three-dimensional dosimetry system for use in quality assurance programs of departments in which radiosurgery is performed.

Methods. A system was developed on the basis of radiochromatic films. The experimental findings of the measured dose distributions for small complex-shaped targets, within a specially designed phantom, are described and compared with the same parameters calculated from the corresponding dose plan. The following parameters were determined for 83 patients with irregularly shaped targets who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS): target volume; dose—volume histograms of the target; 12-Gy, 15-Gy, and 18-Gy volumes; dose plan conformity; dose fall profiles in all dimensions to 50% of the prescription dose; and a quality factor (QF) to evaluate the adequacy of a GKS plan or treatment.

The precise function and accuracy of the developed measuring device is shown and it demonstrated the expected steep dose falloff outside the irregularly shaped targets in all directions. The dose falloff was of the order of > 3 Gy/mm and the values of the QF were in the range between 0.5 and 0.9.

Conclusions. A comparison with data from the literature shows that at least for small targets (< 2 cm3 and < 2.5 cm3) simulated within a head phantom, the dose gradient is significantly steeper in all directions than when using alternative treatment devices in radiosurgery and the overall QF is superior in most of the cases.

[Probabilities of controlling tumors and complications (TCP/NTCP) after radiotherapy: methodologic, physical, and biological aspects]

Radiotherapy is aimed at getting the best possible therapeutic ratio (tumor local control versus morbidity). Physicists and radiation oncologists have to evaluate explicitly or implicitly the probability of induced complications to normal surrounding tissues. This is based on published data and clinician's experience. Quantitative methods have been introduced with different models in order to predict the impact of partial or global irradiation on a normal organ. These models correspond to the Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP). These biological models may be useful to evaluate the quality of a treatment planning or for the optimization process. The methodologies used and the clinical data are developed and discussed.

Radiobiological indices that consider volume: a review

Understanding and predicting the impact of any radiotherapy treatment is critical if patients are to receive treatment with a high likelihood of eliminating the tumour and low likelihood of complications. One of the major contributing factors in determining these effects is the volume treated. This review assesses the current use and accuracy of a series of models which consider volume, building on a previous review which investigated the impact of fractionation particularly with respect to the linear quadratic model. Volume is particularly important in assessing the overall effect with respect to destroying the clonogenic cells and preventing damage to the normal tissues. Dose volume histograms are one of the simplest and most useful forms of representing volume information, however it is difficult to correlate plans based only on DVHs. For this reason various reduction schemes have been introduced and tumour control probability and normal tissues complication probability models adjusted to use this information. Many of these models have proved quite useful in the clinic although they are limited by the available radiobiological data.

The effect of beam energy and number of fields on photon-based IMRT for deep-seated targets

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of energy and number of beams on nontarget dose when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat deep-seated targets.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with prostate cancer (36-226 cc) treated locally to 75.6 Gy were studied. IMRT plans were created for 6-, 10-, and 18-MV photons using 4, 6, 9, and 11 coplanar nonopposed fields. Plans, normalized to cover 95% of the target volume, were analyzed using: (a) conformity index (CI) at 105%, 100%, 95%, 90%, 80%, 70%, 50% of prescribed dose; (b) prescription isodose line (PI); (c) minimum dose to target (Tar(min)); (d) maximum dose to tissue (Tis(max)); (e) dose to rectum/bladder/penis bulb; (f) integral nontarget dose (ID). Because CI evaluates dose independent of location, tissue also was divided into "near region" (NR: 1-cm-thick shell surrounding target) and "far region" (FR: tissue minus NR) volumes that were evaluated at the same levels as CI.

RESULTS

The target and sensitive structure metrics were the same for all plans. However, although there was little difference in NR volume exposed to dose, regardless of energy or number of fields, there was a significant increase in FR volume exposed to dose, at all levels, for low energy/few field plans compared to high energy/many fields (e.g., > 50 cc >or= 65 Gy). This effect disappeared with >or= 9 fields regardless of energy.

CONCLUSION

With IMRT, the use of 6 MV photons with less than 9 fields may result in an increase in dose in regions distant from the target volume (e.g., near the skin surface), even though the CI and sensitive structure metrics may indicate good conformance of high dose to the target volume itself. The clinical significance of this increased dose distant from the target, in terms of complications, remains to be determined.

Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications

PURPOSE

To quantitatively evaluate dose conformity achieved using Gamma Knife radiosurgery, compare results with those reported in the literature, and evaluate risk factors for complications.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All lesions treated at our institution with Gamma Knife radiosurgery from May 1993 (when volume criteria were routinely recorded) through December 1998 were reviewed. Lesions were excluded from analysis for reasons listed below. Conformity index (the ratio of prescription volume to target volume) was calculated for all evaluable lesions and for lesions comparable to those reported in the literature on conformity of linac radiosurgery. Univariate Cox regression models were used to test for associations between treatment parameters and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 1612 targets treated in 874 patients, 274 were excluded, most commonly for unavailability of individual prescription volume data because two or more lesions were included within the same dose matrix (176 lesions), intentional partial coverage for staged treatment of large arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (33 lesions), and missing target volume data (26 lesions). The median conformity indices were 1.67 for all 1338 evaluable lesions and 1.40-1.43 for lesions comparable to two linac radiosurgery series that reported conformity indices of 1.8 and 2.7, respectively. Among all 651 patients evaluable for complications, there were one Grade 5, eight Grade 4, and 27 Grade 3 complications. Increased risk of toxicity was associated with larger target volume, maximum lesion diameter, prescription volume, or volume of nontarget tissue within the prescription volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma Knife radiosurgery achieves much more conformal dose distributions than those reported for conventional linac radiosurgery and somewhat more conformal dose distributions than sophisticated linac radiosurgery techniques. Larger target, nontarget, or prescription volumes are associated with increased risk of toxicity.

Dependence of normal brain integral dose and normal tissue complication probability on the prescription isodose values for gamma-knife radiosurgery

A recent multi-institutional clinical study suggested possible benefits of lowering the prescription isodose lines for stereotactic radiosurgery procedures. In this study, we investigate the dependence of the normal brain integral dose and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) on the prescription isodose values for gamma-knife radiosurgery. An analytical dose model was developed for gamma-knife treatment planning. The dose model was commissioned by fitting the measured dose profiles for each helmet size. The dose model was validated by comparing its results with the Leksell gamma plan (LGP, version 5.30) calculations. The normal brain integral dose and the NTCP were computed and analysed for an ensemble of treatment cases. The functional dependence of the normal brain integral dose and the NCTP versus the prescribing isodose values was studied for these cases. We found that the normal brain integral dose and the NTCP increase significantly when lowering the prescription isodose lines from 50% to 35% of the maximum tumour dose. Alternatively, the normal brain integral dose and the NTCP decrease significantly when raising the prescribing isodose lines from 50% to 65% of the maximum tumour dose. The results may be used as a guideline for designing future dose escalation studies for gamma-knife applications.

Isotropic beam bouquets for shaped beam linear accelerator radiosurgery

In stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy treatment planning, the steepest dose gradient is obtained by using beam arrangements with maximal beam separation. We propose a treatment plan optimization method that optimizes beam directions from the starting point of a set of isotropically convergent beams, as suggested by Webb. The optimization process then individually steers each beam to the best position, based on beam's-eye-view (BEV) critical structure overlaps with the target projection and the target's projected cross sectional area at each beam position. This final optimized beam arrangement maintains a large angular separation between adjacent beams while conformally avoiding critical structures. As shown by a radiosurgery plan, this optimization method improves the critical structure sparing properties of an unoptimized isotropic beam bouquet, while maintaining the same degree of dose conformity and dose gradient. This method provides a simple means of designing static beam radiosurgery plans with conformality indices that are within established guidelines for radiosurgery planning, and with dose gradients that approach those achieved in conventional radiosurgery planning.

A comparison of dose distributions of proton and photon beams in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain lesions

PURPOSE

Micromultileaf collimators (mMLC) have recently been introduced to conform photon beams in stereotactic irradiation of brain lesions. Proton beams and stereotactic conformal radiotherapy (SCRT) can be used to tailor the dose to nonspherical targets, as most tumors of the brain are irregularly shaped. Comparative planning of brain lesions using either proton or stereotactically guided photon beams was done to assess the institution's clinically available modality for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For the photon treatment, multiple stereotactically guided uniform intensity beams from a linear accelerator were used, each conformed to a projection of the planning target volume (PTV) by a mMLC. Proton beams were delivered from an isocentrically mounted gantry, using the spot-scanning technique and energy modulation. Seven patients were scanned in a stereotactic frame; target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were delineated with the help of MR images. Four different lesions were selected: (1) concave, (2) ellipsoid isolated, (3) superficial and close to an organ at risk, and (4) irregular complex. Dose distributions in the PTV and critical structures were calculated using three-dimensional treatment-planning systems, followed by both a quantitative (by dose--volume histogram and conformity index) and qualitative (visual inspection) assessment of the plans.

RESULTS

A high degree of conformation was achieved with a mMLC and stereotactic uniform intensity beams with comparable conformity indices to protons for 5 out of 7 plans, especially for superficial or spherical lesions. In the cases studied, the conformity index was better for protons than for photons for complex or concave lesions, or when the PTV was in the neighborhood of critical structures.

CONCLUSION

The results for the cases studied, show that for simple geometries or for superficial lesions, there is no advantage in using protons. However, for complex PTV shapes, or when the PTV is in the vicinity of critical structures, protons seem to be potentially better than the fixed-field photon technique.

Dynamic arc radiosurgery field shaping: a comparison with static field conformal and noncoplanar circular arcs

PURPOSE

Recent advances in field-shaping technology and linac multileaf collimator (MLC) integration have resulted in new approaches to performing stereotactic radiosurgery. We present a modeling study comparing the absolute dose distributions from three radiosurgery delivery techniques: a conventional approach utilizing noncoplanar circular arcs, a static field conformal approach, and a dynamic arc field-shaping approach. In the latter, the MLC leaves more in a continuous fashion, conforming to the beam's-eye-view projection of the target at every increment along the path of an arc.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For the analysis, we devised a simulated target consisting of three overlapping spheres. This was chosen because it offered a straightforward planning approach for all three techniques, primarily the multiple isocenter approach. In addition, three representative cases were selected from the prior radiosurgery experience. These range in increasing size, from 0.50 to 9.79 cm(3), and in complexity, requiring from 3 isocenters to 16 in the case of circular arcs. In each situation, the goals were twofold: (1) to cover the entire volume with as high an appropriate isodose level (90% in the case of the conformal and dynamic arc techniques, 50% in the case of circular collimators) while (2) minimizing the dose to normal brain and where applicable, any adjacent radiation-sensitive structures. Because of the latter requirement, a single isocenter circular arc approach was ruled out for the analysis.

RESULTS

In the case of large or irregularly shaped lesions, the circular arc technique requires multiple isocenters, producing a high level of dose heterogeneity within the target volume. Both the static field and dynamic arc conformal techniques, as with all single isocenter approaches, produce a highly homogeneous dose throughout the target region. For a given large dose, peripheral dose is decreased as additional beams or arc degrees are added with either of the conformal approaches. Dose--volume histogram analysis evaluating the peripheral dose shows that, in many cases, dose to surrounding structures can be reduced through the use of a conformal static or dynamic arc approach over the conventional multiple isocenter, circular arc techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic arc shaping is an efficient and effective method for accurately delivering a homogeneous target dose while simultaneously minimizing peripheral dose in radiosurgery applications.

Stereotactic proton beam therapy of skull base meningiomas

PURPOSE

To review outcomes for patients with skull base meningiomas treated using the stereotactic proton beam at the National Accelerator Center (NAC), Republic of South Africa.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Since 1993, 27 patients with intracranial meningiomas have been treated stereotactically with protons at NAC. Of those, 23 were located on the skull base, were large or had complex shapes, and were treated with radical intent. Both stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT, 16 or more fractions) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT, 3 fractions) were used. Eighteen patients underwent proton HSRT, while 5 patients were treated with SRT. The mean target volume for the HSRT group was 15.6 cm(3) (range 2.6-63 cm(3)). The mean ICRU reference dose was 20.3 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGyE), and the mean minimum planning target dose was 16.3 CGyE. The mean clinical and radiologic follow-up periods were 40 and 31 months respectively. The mean volume in the SRT group was 43.7 cm(3), with ICRU reference doses ranging from 54 CGyE in 27 fractions to 61.6 CGyE in 16 fractions.

RESULTS

In the HSRT group, 16/18 (89%) of patients remained clinically stable or improved, while 2/18 (11%) deteriorated. Radiologic control was achieved in 88% of patients, while 2 patients had a marginal failure. Among the 5 SRT patients, 2 were clinically better, and 3 remained stable. All SRT patients achieved radiologic control. Three patients (13%), 2 of them in the HSRT group, suffered permanent neurologic deficits. Analyzing different dose/fractionation schedules, an alpha/beta value of 3.7 Gy for meningiomas is estimated.

CONCLUSION

Proton irradiation is effective and safe in controlling large and complex-shaped skull base meningiomas.

Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations as a means to compare proton and photon plans and evaluation of clinical appropriateness of calculated values

Calculation of normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for proton radiation therapy (PRT) and two photon radiation therapy techniques for cranial irradiation of childhood optic nerve gliomas was made. Evaluation of usefulness of calculated NTCP values for comparison of treatment plans and clinical appropriateness of computed data was used. Three radiation plans were calculated on datasets of children treated previously for optic nerve gliomas with PRT. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were computed and used to calculate NTCP. Evaluated complication endpoints were necrosis, blindness, and cognitive impairment. Calculated NTCP depended strongly on tumor volume and the normal tissue volume exposed to high radiation doses. Dose conformity and steeper dose-gradient correlated with reduced NTCP. Regarding the chosen complication endpoints, PRT was superior to 3D photons; conventional photons were calculated to have the highest NTCPs. Differences might reach clinical significance for cognitive impairment, a frequently observed toxicity. Calculated NTCP values were highly dependent on implemented clinical data. Calculation of NTCP can be used for ranking of treatment plans and modalities. Highly dependent on implemented clinical data, the calculated percentage of NTCP might be more of a figure of merit than a real predictive value and requires comparison to clinical experience. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 351-358 (2000).

A quality factor to compare the dosimetry of gamma knife radiosurgery and intensity-modulated radiation therapy quantitatively as a function of target volume and shape

✓The authors have developed a quality factor (QF) to compare gamma knife radiosurgery, linear accelerator radiosurgery, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry. This QF relates the percentage of target covered (PTC) by the prescription radiation isodose, target volume (VT), and enclosed tissue volume, which receives greater than a particular dose (VX): QFX = PTC×VT/VX. The authors investigated target shape independent of volume in predicting radiosurgical complication rates.

Plastic targets of a defined volume (0.2, 0.5, 1.5, and 10 cm3) and four increasingly complex shapes (spherical, ellipsoid, simulated arteriovenous malformation [AVM], and horseshoe) were created. Dosimetry was studied on the Leksell GammaPlan, Adac/Pinnacle, and Nomos Corvus workstations. The dosimetry of a new 4 mm × 10—mm IMRT collimator array (the Nomos Beak) not yet validated for use in our clinical practice was studied.

Particularly for larger targets, the gamma knife and IMRT Beak plans show similar conformality (QF assuming 15-Gy volume [QF15]). Particularly for small and round targets the gamma knife plan quality is significantly higher (QF assuming 12-Gy volume [QF12]). As VT and complexity increase, the IMRT Beak QF12 approaches that of the gamma knife.

The QF12 of gamma knife dosimetry has an inverse correlation with target shape complexity independent of VT.

At a prescription dose of 15 Gy to the target margin, the QF15 is a conformality index. The 12-Gy volume (volume enclosed by 12-Gy surface/volume receiving at least 12 Gy) estimates the radiosurgical normal tissue complication rate for AVMs. When the target is well covered, the QF12 is inversely proportional to the complication risk and is a measure of the plan quality.

[Conformal radiotherapy: tomotherapy]

Conformal radiation therapy allows the possibility of delivering high doses at the tumor volume whilst limiting the dose to the surrounding tissues and diminishing the secondary effects. With the example of the conformal radiation therapy used at the AZ VUB (3DCRT and tomotherapy), two treatment plans of a left ethmoid carcinoma will be evaluated and discussed in detail. The treatment of ethmoid cancer is technically difficult for both radiation therapy and surgery because of the anatomic constraints and patterns of local spread. A radiation therapy is scheduled to be delivered after surgical resection of the tumor. The treatment plan for the radiation therapy was calculated on a three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning system based on virtual simulation with a beam's eye view: George Sherouse's Gratis. An effort was made to make the plan as conformal and as homogeneous as possible to deliver a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions at the tumor bed with a maximum dose of 56 Gy to the right optic nerve and the chiasma. To establish the clinical utility and potential advantages of tomotherapy over 3DCRT for ethmoid carcinoma, the treatment of this patient was also planned with Peacock Plan. For both treatment plans the isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVH) were computed. Superimposing the CDVHs yielded similar curves for the target and an obvious improvement for organs at risk such as the chiasma, brainstem and the left eye when applying tomotherapy. These results have also been reflected in the tumor control probabilities (equal for both plans) and the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), yielded significant reductions in NTCP for tomotherapy. The probability of uncomplicated tumor control was 52.7% for tomotherapy against 38.3% for 3DCRT.

Gamma surgery for vestibular schwannoma

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to assess the results of gamma surgery (GS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) in 200 cases treated over the last 10 years and to review the role of this neurosurgical procedure in the management of VS.

METHODS

Follow-up reviews ranging from 1 to 10 years were available in 153 of these patients. Follow-up images in these cases were analyzed using computer software that we developed to obtain volume measurements for the tumors, and the clinical condition of the patients was assessed using questionnaires. Gamma surgery was the primary treatment modality in 96 cases and followed microsurgery in 57 cases. Tumors ranged in volume from 0.02 to 18.3 cm(3). In the group in which GS was the primary treatment, a decrease in volume was observed in 78 cases (81%), no change in 12 (12%), and an increase in volume in six cases (6%). The decrease was more than 75% in seven cases. In the group treated following microsurgery, a decrease in volume was observed in 37 cases (65%), no change in 14 (25%), and an increase in volume in six (11%). The decrease was more than 75% in eight cases. Five patients experienced trigeminal dysfunction; in three cases this was transient and in the other two it was persistent, although there has been improvement. Three patients had facial paresis (in one case this was transient, lasting 6 weeks; in one case there was 80% recovery at 18 months posttreatment; and in one case surgery was performed after the onset of facial paresis for presumed increase in tumor size). Over a 6-year period, hearing deteriorated in 60% of the patients. Three patients showed an improvement in hearing. No hearing deterioration was observed during the first 2 years of follow-up review.

CONCLUSIONS

Gamma surgery should be used to treat postoperative residual tumors as well as tumors in patients with medical conditions that preclude surgery. Microsurgery should be performed whenever a surgeon is confident of extirpating the tumor with a risk-benefit ratio superior to that presented in this study.

An efficient method of measuring the 4 mm helmet output factor for the Gamma knife

It is essential to have accurate measurements of the 4 mm helmet output factor in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia patients using the Gamma Knife. Because of the small collimator size and the sharp dose gradient at the beam focus, this measurement is generally tedious and difficult. We have developed an efficient method of measuring the 4 mm helmet output factor using regular radiographic films. The helmet output factor was measured by exposing a single Kodak XV film in the standard Leksell spherical phantom using the 18 mm helmet with 30-40 of its plug collimators replaced by the 4 mm plug collimators. The 4 mm helmet output factor was measured to be 0.876 +/- 0.009. This is in excellent agreement with our EGS4 Monte Carlo simulated value of 0.876 +/- 0.005. This helmet output factor value also agrees with more tedious TLD, diode and radiochromic film measurements that were each obtained using two separate measurements with the 18 mm helmet and the 4 mm helmet respectively. The 4 mm helmet output factor measured by the diode was 0.884 +/- 0.016, and the TLD measurement was 0.890 +/- 0.020. The radiochromic film measured value was 0.870 +/- 0.018. Because a single-exposure measurement was performed instead of a double exposure measurement, most of the systematic errors that appeared in the double-exposure measurements due to experimental setup variations were cancelled out. Consequently, the 4 mm helmet output factor is more precisely determined by the single-exposure approach. Therefore, routine measurement and quality assurance of the 4 mm helmet output factor of the Gamma Knife could be efficiently carried out using the proposed single-exposure technique.

A dosimetric comparison of fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for treating intermediate intracranial lesions

PURPOSE

To compare and evaluate treatment plans for the fan-beam intensity modulated radiotherapy and the Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treating medium-size intracranial lesions (range 4-25 cm3).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Treatment plans were developed for the Leksell Gamma Knife and a fan-beam inverse treatment planning system for intensity modulated radiotherapy. Treatment plan comparisons were carried out using dose-volume histogram (DVH), tissue-volume ratio (TVR), and maximum dose to the prescription dose (MDPD) ratio. The study was carried out for both simulated targets and clinical targets with irregular shapes and at different locations.

RESULTS

The MDPD ratio was significantly greater for the Gamma Knife plans than for the fan-beam IMRT plans. The Gamma Knife plans produced equivalent TVR values to the fan-beam IMRT plans. Based on the DVH comparison, the fan-beam IMRT delivered significantly more dose to the normal brain tissue than the Gamma Knife. The results of the comparison were found to be insensitive to the target locations.

CONCLUSION

The Gamma Knife is better than the fan-beam IMRT in sparing normal brain tissue while producing equivalent tumor dose conformity for treating medium-size intracranial lesions. However, the target dose homogeneity is significantly better for the fan-beam IMRT than for the Gamma Knife.

Determining the optimal block margin on the planning target volume for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the block margin that minimizes normal tissue irradiation outside of the planning target volume (PTV) for body stereotactic radiotherapy (Body-SRT) of lung and liver tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Representative patient cases of lung and liver tumors were chosen for analysis. A PTV was constructed for each case and plans were generated which employed an array of block margins ranging from -2.5 mm to 10 mm at isocenter. Plans were generated for cerrobend blocks and for a multileaf collimator. The prescription isodose coverage was renormalized for each case and dose-volume histograms (DVH) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were determined for each plan.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

For the cases studied, the optimal block margin was in the 0.0 mm range. The ranking of plans was identical for both dose-volume based and biological based criteria. The method of blocking had no significant effect on treatment plans. The use of narrow margins for Body-SRT results in normal tissue sparing and creates significant target dose inhomogeneity which may be beneficial for tumor control.

Novel radiation technologies for malignant gliomas

Despite the advent of new technologies available for the imaging of brain tumors and the evolution of methods to deliver more focused radiation therapy, most malignant gliomas recur locally. Therapies aimed at increasing local control of gliomas will set the stage for improved survival in a disease with a dismal overall prognosis. This review focuses on several radiotherapeutic approaches to dose escalation that may help improve local control.

Comparison of radiosurgery treatment modalities based on physical dose distributions

PURPOSE

As a means of selecting the optimal stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment modality, a comparison of physical dose distributions to defined targets and nontarget brain tissue has been made for a group of test cases selected to represent a range of treatment-planning situations from small, nearly spherical volumes to large irregular volumes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans were developed for each case using photon beams from the Leksell Gamma Unit (LGU), multiarc bremsstrahlung photon beams from a linear accelerator (linac) and proton beams, with the objective of encompassing the target as closely as possible with the prescription isodose line, and minimizing dosage to normal tissue within the bounds of standard clinical practice. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for target and for nontarget brain tissue and compared for the various modalities.

RESULTS

In general, protons delivered less dosage to normal brain than other modalities for large and peripheral lesions and LGU plans were more successful at conforming to highly irregular shapes than conventional linac plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were observed to depend on treatment modality, target characteristics (shape, size and location), and the amount of effort expended on treatment planning and the time allotted for treatment implementation.