The clinical implications of hydronephrosis and the level of ureteral obstruction in stage IIIB cervical cancer

Chemoradiotherapy treatment with gemcitabine improves renal function in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with renal dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer (CC) in Mexico is diagnosed mainly in locally advanced (LACC) and advanced (ACC) stages, where ureteral obstruction is more frequent. The standard treatment for this population is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin, which is nephrotoxic and could lead to further deterioration of renal function in LACC patients with renal function decline. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CCRT with Gemcitabine on renal function in LACC patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study included LACC patients treated with CCRT with Gemcitabine as a radiosensitizer from February 2003 to December 2018. Data were collected from medical archives and electronic records. We assessed renal function before and after CCRT treatment and analyzed the patient's response to treatment and survival.

RESULTS

351 LACC patients treated were included and stratified into two groups: 198 with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥60ml/min (group A) and 153 with GFR<60ml/min (group B). An improvement in GFR was observed after CCRT in patients in group B, from 33 ml/min to 57.5 ml/min (p<0.001). Complete response was observed in 64.1% of patients in Group A and 43.8% in Group B (p<0.0001). Factors associated with increased risk of death included having a GFR of 15-29 ml/min (HR: 2.17; 1.08-4.35), having GFR<15 ml/min (HR: 3.08; 1.63-5.79), and receiving Boost treatment (HR: 2.09; 1.18-3.69). On the other hand, receiving brachytherapy is a positive predictor for OS (HR:0.51; 0.31-0.84).

CONCLUSION

CCRT with gemcitabine is an appropriate treatment option for patients diagnosed with LACC who present impaired renal function due to the disease's obstructive nature or other comorbidities.

Prognostic role of hydronephrosis in the treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Obstructive uropathy is present in almost 50% of patients with advanced cervical cancer and is associated with worse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prognostic role of hydronephrosis and the impact of ureteral obstruction resolution in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage IIIB to IVA treated in a tertiary oncologic referral center in Brazil between January 2009 and June 2018. Three different groups were evaluated: (I) without hydronephrosis, (II) with hydronephrosis and urinary diversion, and (III) with hydronephrosis but no urinary diversion. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests estimated overall survival and progression-free survival based on the presence of hydronephrosis and urinary diversion. Clinicopathological variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model for overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were evaluated: group I - 62 (41.1%); II - 44 (29.1%), and III - 45 (29.8%). Stage, histological type or grade, tumor size, parametrial or lymph node involvement were not statistically different between groups. Group I had more favorable overall survival than groups II (p<0.003) and III (p<0.02); however, no difference was noted between groups II and III. Progression-free survival was similar between groups (log-rank test p=0.95). Univariate analysis revealed hydronephrosis (p=0.002) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p<0.001) as a prognostic factor for worse overall survival; while tumor size (p=0.023), pelvic lymphadenopathy (p=0.015), and histological type (p=0.03) were associated with worse progression-free survival. On multivariate analysis, hydronephrosis remained as an independently associated factor with worse overall survival (HR=2.06; 95% CI 1.12 to 3.79, p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with hydronephrosis had lower overall survival even after controlling for potential confounding factors, but no difference in progression-free survival. Urinary diversion showed no impact on overall survival or progression-free survival.

Palliative radiation treatment used for multiple purposes in a single irradiation field

In this case report, radiation therapy was performed for bilateral hydronephrosis developed during multiple bone metastases of breast cancer and ileus due to peritoneal dissemination. The patient's preirradiation creatinine level was 8.2 mg/dL, which decreased by the fourth day after starting irradiation therapy. Creatinine level ultimately decreased to 0.6 mg/dL. Pain due to lumbar spine metastasis alleviated and ileus was resolved, allowing the patient to live at home for approximately 5 weeks. The effect of radiotherapy for bilateral hydronephrosis and gastrointestinal obstruction was rapid and good. Palliative radiation treatment can be used for multiple purposes, and in the present patient, we were able to prolong the vital prognosis.

Incidence, management, and sequelae of ureteric obstruction in women with cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Hydronephrosis due to ureteric obstruction (UO) is stage-defining at cervical cancer presentation but may occur after primary staging. We aimed to determine the incidence and review the presentation and management of UO in women with cervical cancer attending our center. Particular attention was paid to the evolving role of interventional radiology (IR) in management.

METHODS

Women with a new diagnosis of cervical cancer between January 2012 and December 2016 formed the cohort that was retrospectively reviewed from the oncology database and patient records.

RESULTS

There were 310 women diagnosed with cervical cancer; 240 were stages I/II and 70 were stages III/IV. Primary treatments were chemoradiotherapy (n = 168; 54.2%), surgery (n = 121; 39.0%), and palliative care alone (n = 21; 6.8%). UO occurred in 74 (23.9%); present at primary staging in 53 (71.6%) and arising after staging in 21 (28.4%). Primary interventions for hydronephrosis were IR (n = 50; 67.6%), cystoscopic stenting (n = 19; 25.7%), bowel urinary conduit construction (n = 2; 2.7%), and none (n = 3; 4.1%). For those who attended IR, the mean number of IR procedures was 2.2, range 1-7. Maximum serum creatinine was 303 μmol/L for women with UO at primary staging compared with 252 μmol/L for UO after staging (P = 0.267). Thirty-eight women experienced substantial morbidity related to UO. Stage-adjusted mortality risk was 2.3 times higher for UO cases compared with those without UO.

CONCLUSIONS

UO is associated with substantial morbidity and survival disadvantage in cervical cancer and may present after primary cancer staging. We recommend renal biochemistry during routine follow-up. A majority of cervical cancer-associated UO cases are managed with IR in our center.

Survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer and accompanying hydronephrosis: A systematic review of the literature

Hydronephrosis is a sign of advanced stage disease in patients with cervical cancer. Its presence is believed to negatively affect the survival of patients. To date, however, consensus in this field is still lacking. The purpose of the present systematic review is to gather the available data and to provide directions for future research in the field. We systematically searched Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRA and Google Scholar databases from inception till June 2018. Overall, 22 studies were included in the present systematic review that evaluated outcomes from 8521 patients with cervical cancer. The findings of our systematic review support that hydronephrosis negatively affects the overall survival of cervical cancer patients. Specifically, the reported 5- year OS hazards ratio for hydronephrosis ranged between 1.34 and 3.74. Outcomes concerning the disease-free survival of these patients were, however, less discrete. None of the included studies reported whether the decreased survival of patients with hydronephrosis was attributed to complications of obstructive uropathy such as uremia and sepsis. Thus, it remains, to date, unclear whether placement of ureteral stents or percutaneous nephrostomy may actually benefit these patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the actual impact of hydronephrosis on survival rates at the various stages of cervical cancer and to help establish consensus regarding the optimal mode of management of these patients.

Hydronephrosis in patients with cervical cancer: an assessment of morbidity and survival

PURPOSE

Hydronephrosis is a frequently observed but understudied complication in patients with cervical cancer. To better characterize hydronephrosis in cervical cancer patients, the current study sought (1) to describe hydronephrosis-associated morbidity and (2) to analyze the prognostic effect of hydronephrosis in patients with a broad range of cancer stages over time.

METHODS

The Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry was interrogated for all invasive cervical cancer patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from 2008 through 2013 in Rochester, Minnesota; these patients' medical records were then reviewed in detail.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-nine cervical cancer patients with a median age of 49 years and a range of cancer stages were included. Sixty-five patients (23 %) were diagnosed with hydronephrosis at some point during their disease course. In univariate analyses, hydronephrosis was associated with advanced cancer stage (p < 0.0001), squamous histology (p = 0.0079), and nonsurgical cancer treatment (p = 0.0039). In multivariate analyses, stage and tumor histology were associated with hydronephrosis. All but one patient underwent stent placement or urinary diversion; hydronephrosis-related morbidity included pain, urinary tract infections, nausea and vomiting, renal failure, and urinary tract bleeding. In landmark univariate survival analyses, hydronephrosis was associated with worse survival at all time points. In landmark multivariate analyses (adjusted for patient age, stage, cancer treatment, and tumor histology), hydronephrosis was associated with a trend toward worse survival over time (hazard ratios ranged from 1.47 to 4.69).

CONCLUSION

Hydronephrosis in cervical cancer patients is associated with notable morbidity. It is also associated with trends toward worse survival-even if it occurs after the original cancer diagnosis.

Hydronephrosis as a prognostic indicator of survival in advanced cervix cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether hydronephrosis is an independent prognostic indicator of survival among patients with advanced cervical carcinoma. Moreover, we wanted to demonstrate the relationship between unilateral and bilateral hydronephrosis and overall survival.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 197 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB cervical carcinoma or higher treated between 1990 and 2007 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were clinical staging according to FIGO criteria, standardized radiation treatment and cisplatin-based chemosensitization regimens. Associations between hydronephrosis and covariates-age, race, histopathologic diagnosis, pelvic sidewall involvement, stage, nodal involvement, and Gynecologic Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS)-were determined. Statistical analysis including Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, proportional hazards regression, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney test were used where appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 143 included patients, 73 patients had no hydronephrosis (HN), 39 patients had unilateral HN, and 31 patients had bilateral HN. Twenty-nine patients (40%) with no HN died compared to 24 patients (61.5%) with unilateral HN and 21 patients (67.7%) with bilateral HN. Median time to death was significantly shorter for patients with unilateral HN (27 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10-48) and bilateral HN (12 months; 95% CI, 6-23) versus patients without HN (68 months; 95% CI, 39-∞; P < 0.001). Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for HN (both unilateral and bilateral) was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.5-3.8); P < 0.001. Of potential covariates evaluated, PS and sidewall involvement were significantly associated with HN (P = 0.021 and P = 0.014, respectively). Proportional hazards regression revealed that controlling for use of radiation, chemotherapy, and for PS, HN was still significantly associated with poor prognosis (HR unilateral HN = 2.0, 95% CI, 1.2-3.5; HR bilateral HN = 3.2, 95% CI, 1.7-6.0); P ≤ 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Hydronephrosis is an independent poor prognostic indicator of survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Bilateral hydronephrosis compared to unilateral involvement confers a worse overall prognosis. Additional studies are needed to determine if FIGO staging should be amended.

Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing concurrent single agent cisplatin, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy, or hydroxyurea during pelvic irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE

We report the long-term survival and toxicity of a randomized phase III study comparing cisplatin alone with cisplatin, flurouracil, and hydroxyurea versus hydroxyurea concurrent with pelvic irradiation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with pathologically negative para-aortic nodes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Comparisons of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between treatment arms utilized Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistics. Relative risk estimates adjusting for prognostic factors were determined using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Pearson's 2 test was used to assess differences in adverse events.

RESULTS

The analysis included 526 patients. The median follow-up among surviving patients was 106 months. Consistent with the original report, improvement in PFS and OS was evident for both cisplatin-containing arms compared with hydroxyurea (P < .001). Analogous results were seen for stage IIB and for stage III disease (each P < .025). The relative risk of progression of disease or death was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.75) with cisplatin and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.67) with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy compared with hydroxyurea. Among 518 patients who received radiation, acute (grade 3 or 4) gastrointestinal or urologic toxicities occurred in 66 with cisplatin (19.1%) and 29 with hydroxyurea (16.8%). Delayed radiation toxicity occurred in six patients who received cisplatin (1.7%) and two who received hydroxyurea (1.2%; P = .680).

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy during pelvic radiation therapy improves long-term PFS and OS among locally advanced cervical cancer patients collectively and for stage IIB and III disease, individually. There was no observed increase in late toxicity with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy.

FDG-PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIb cervical carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical Stage IIIb cervical carcinoma as a function of site of initial regional lymph node metastasis as detected by 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-seven patients with FIGO Stage IIIb cervical cancer were evaluated before therapy with whole-body FDG-PET. Most patients were treated with external beam irradiation, intracavitary brachytherapy, and weekly cisplatin for six cycles. Overall and cause-specific survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The pretreatment whole-body FDG-PET demonstrated that all patients had FDG uptake in the cervix. Of 47 patients, 13 (28%) had no evidence of lymph node metastasis, 20 (43%) had metastasis to pelvic lymph nodes only, 7 (15%) had pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases, and 7 (15%) had metastases to pelvic, para-aortic, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. The 3-year estimate of cause-specific survival was 73% for those with no lymph node metastasis, 58% for those with only pelvic lymph node metastasis, 29% for those with pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases, and 0% for those with pelvic, para-aortic, and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

The cause-specific survival for patients with FIGO Stage IIIb carcinoma is highly dependent on the extent of lymph node metastasis as demonstrated by whole-body FDG-PET.

Figo IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: an analysis of prognostic factors emphasizing the balance between external beam and intracavitary radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To define patient, tumor, and treatment factors that influence the outcome of patients with FIGO Stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 1,096 patients treated with radiation therapy between 1960 and 1993 for FIGO Stage IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix were reviewed retrospectively. Of these, 983 (90%) were treated with curative intent and 113 were treated only to achieve palliation of symptoms. Of 907 patients who completed the intended curative treatment, 641 (71%) were treated with a combination of external beam irradiation (EBRT) and intracavitary irradiation (ICRT) and 266 (29%) were treated with EBRT only. The median duration of treatment for these 907 patients was 51 days. Between 1966 and 1980, only 52% of patients who completed treatment with curative intent received ICRT, compared with 92% of patients treated during 1981-1993, an increase that reflects an evolution in the philosophy of treatment for advanced tumors. In general, the intensity of ICRT correlated inversely with the dose of EBRT to the,central pelvis. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 134 months.

RESULTS

For 983 patients treated with initial curative intent, disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly worse for those who were < 40 years old, had experienced more than a 10% weight loss, or had a hemoglobin level < 10 g/dl before or during radiation therapy. Tumor factors that correlated with a relatively poor DSS were bilateral pelvic wall involvement, clinical tumor diameter > or = 8 cm, hydronephrosis, lower vaginal involvement, and evidence of lymph node metastases on lymphangiogram (p < 0.01 in all cases). For the 907 patients who completed treatment with curative intent, 641 who had ICRT had a DSS of 45% at 5 years, compared with 24% for those treated with EBRT alone (p < 0.0001). Those who received > 52 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis had DSS rates of 27-34%, compared with 53% for patients treated with lower doses of EBRT to the central pelvis and more intensive ICRT (p < 0.0001). At 5 years, the actuarial risk of major complications was also greater for patients treated with > 52 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis (57-68%), compared with those who had 48-52 Gy (28%) and those who had < or = 47 Gy of EBRT to the central pelvis (15%) (p < 0.0001). Outcome was also compared for four time periods during which different treatment policies were in place for patients with Stage IIIB disease. The highest DSS (51%) and lowest actuarial complication rate (17%) were achieved during the most recent period (1981-1993) when modest doses of EBRT were combined with relatively intensive ICRT (p < 0.01 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Aggressive use of ICRT, carefully balanced with pelvic EBRT, is necessary to achieve the best ratio between tumor control and complications for patients with FIGO Stage IIIB carcinoma of the cervix. In our experience, the highest DSS rates and the lowest complication rates were achieved with a combination of 40-45 Gy of EBRT combined with ICRT.