Enhancement of radiation response by paclitaxel in mice according to different treatment schedules

Exercise and Prebiotic Fiber Provide Gut Microbiota-Driven Benefit in a Survivor to Germ-Free Mouse Translational Model of Breast Cancer

Simple Summary

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. In recent years, the community of microbes that inhabit the intestinal tract, called the gut microbiota, has been shown to influence patient response to several cancer therapies. On the other hand, treatments such as chemotherapy can disrupt the resident gut microbiota and potentially contribute to poor health outcomes. Strategies to improve the composition of the gut microbiota include dietary and exercise interventions. While diet and exercise are already established as important for breast cancer prevention, during treatment, and for reducing recurrence, little is known about the impact of these factors on the gut microbiota in the context of breast cancer. Therefore, our aim was to examine the impact of exercise and diet on the gut microbiota in breast cancer. Our findings indicate that exercise and prebiotic fiber supplementation may provide benefits to individuals with breast cancer through advantageous gut microbial changes. Our findings of a potential adjuvant of exercise and prebiotics should inspire further mechanistic and clinical investigations.

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a role in shaping overall host health and response to several cancer treatments. Factors, such as diet, exercise, and chemotherapy, can alter the gut microbiota. In the present study, the Alberta Cancer Exercise (ACE) program was investigated as a strategy to favorably modify the gut microbiota of breast cancer survivors who had received chemotherapy. Subsequently, the ability of post-exercise gut microbiota, alone or with prebiotic fiber supplementation, to influence breast cancer outcomes was interrogated using fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in germ-free mice. While cancer survivors experienced little gut microbial change following ACE, in the mice, tumor volume trended consistently lower over time in mice colonized with post-exercise compared to pre-exercise microbiota with significant differences on days 16 and 22. Beta diversity analysis revealed that EO771 breast tumor cell injection and Paclitaxel chemotherapy altered the gut microbial communities in mice. Enrichment of potentially protective microbes was found in post-exercise microbiota groups. Tumors of mice colonized with post-exercise microbiota exhibited more favorable cytokine profiles, including decreased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels. Beneficial microbial and molecular outcomes were augmented with prebiotic supplementation. Exercise and prebiotic fiber demonstrated adjuvant action, potentially via an enhanced anti-tumor immune response modulated by advantageous gut microbial shifts.

Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy Targeting Cancer Stem Cells from Mono- to Combination Therapy

Paclitaxel (PTX) is a chemotherapeutical agent commonly used to treat several kinds of cancer. PTX is known as a microtubule-targeting agent with a primary molecular mechanism that disrupts the dynamics of microtubules and induces mitotic arrest and cell death. Simultaneously, other mechanisms have been evaluated in many studies. Since the anticancer activity of PTX was discovered, it has been used to treat many cancer patients and has become one of the most extensively used anticancer drugs. Regrettably, the resistance of cancer to PTX is considered an extensive obstacle in clinical applications and is one of the major causes of death correlated with treatment failure. Therefore, the combination of PTX with other drugs could lead to efficient therapeutic strategies. Here, we summarize the mechanisms of PTX, and the current studies focusing on PTX and review promising combinations.

Combination Radioimmunotherapy Strategies for Solid Tumors

Combination radioimmunotherapy is an emerging approach for the treatment of solid tumors where radio immunotherapy alone has proven to be reasonably ineffective. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) labeled with radionuclides is an attractive approach for cancer treatment because tumor-associated mAbs with cytotoxic radionuclides can selectively bind to tumor antigens. However, due to various limitations, mAbs cannot reach solid tumors, consequently reducing RIT efficacy. Combination RIT is a pragmatic approach through which the addition of drugs or other agents not only help mAbs to reach the targeted site but also improves its efficacy. Thus, the combination of drugs or moieties with RIT can be applied to overcome the barriers that RIT faces for solid tumors. This review covers the RIT approach, along with the mechanism of action of mAb used in RIT, limitations of solid tumors, and strategies that can be used in combination RIT to enhance the treatment regimen for solid tumors.

AIEgen-based theranostic system: targeted imaging of cancer cells and adjuvant amplification of antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel

Photosensitizers are generally treated as key components for photodynamic therapy. In contrast, we herein report an aggregation-induced emission luminogen (AIEgen)-based photosensitizer (TPE-Py-FFGYSA) that can serve as a non-toxic adjuvant to amplify the antitumor efficacy of paclitaxel, a well-known anticancer drug, with a synergistic effect of "0 + 1 > 1". Besides the adjuvant function, TPE-Py-FFGYSA can selectively light up EphA2 protein clusters overexpressed in cancer cells in a fluorescence turn-on mode, by taking advantage of the specific YSA peptide (YSAYPDSVPMMS)-EphA2 protein interaction. The simple incorporation of FFG as a self-assembly-aided unit between AIEgen (TPE-Py) and YSA significantly enhances the fluorescent signal output of TPE-Py when imaging EphA2 clusters in live cancer cells. Cytotoxicity and western blot studies reveal that the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by TPE-Py-FFGYSA upon exposure to light do not kill cancer cells, but instead provide an intracellular oxidative environment to help paclitaxel have much better efficacy. This study thus not only extends the application scope of photosensitizers, but also offers a unique theranostic system with the combination of diagnostic imaging and adjuvant antitumor therapy.

Paclitaxel Through the Ages of Anticancer Therapy: Exploring Its Role in Chemoresistance and Radiation Therapy

Paclitaxel (Taxol^®) is a member of the taxane class of anticancer drugs and one of the most common chemotherapeutic agents used against many forms of cancer. Paclitaxel is a microtubule-stabilizer that selectively arrests cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle, and found to induce cytotoxicity in a time and concentration-dependent manner. Paclitaxel has been embedded in novel drug formulations, including albumin and polymeric micelle nanoparticles, and applied to many anticancer treatment regimens due to its mechanism of action and radiation sensitizing effects. Though paclitaxel is a major anticancer drug which has been used for many years in clinical treatments, its therapeutic efficacy can be limited by common encumbrances faced by anticancer drugs. These encumbrances include toxicities, de novo refraction, and acquired multidrug resistance (MDR). This article will give a current and comprehensive review of paclitaxel, beginning with its unique history and pharmacology, explore its mechanisms of drug resistance and influence in combination with radiation therapy, while highlighting current treatment regimens, formulations, and new discoveries.

Poly (amino acid) micelle nanocarriers in preclinical and clinical studies

Polymeric micelles are expected to increase the accumulation of drugs in tumor tissues utilizing the EPR effect and to incorporate various kinds of drugs into the inner core by chemical conjugation or physical entrapment with relatively high stability. The size of the micelles can be controlled within the diameter range of 20 to 100 nm, to ensure that the micelles do not pass through normal vessel walls; therefore, a reduced incidence of the side effects of the drugs may be expected due to the decreased volume of distribution. These are several anticancer agent-incorporated micelle carrier systems under clinical evaluation. Phase 1 studies of a CDDP incorporated micelle, Nc-6004, and an sN-38 incorporated micelle, NK012, are now underway. A phase 2 study of a PTX incorporated micelle, NK105, against stomach cancer is also underway.

NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle, is a more potent radiosensitising agent compared to free paclitaxel

NK105 is a micellar nanoparticle formulation designed to enhance the delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) to solid tumours. It has been reported to exert antitumour activity in vivo and to have reduced neurotoxicity as compared to that of free PTX. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiosensitising effect of NK105 in comparison with that of PTX. Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC)-bearing mice were administered a single intravenous (i.v.) injection of PTX or NK105; 24 h after the drug administration, a proportion of the mice received radiation to the tumour site or lung fields. Then, the antitumour activity and lung toxicity were evaluated. In one subset of mice, the tumours were excised and specimens were prepared for analysis of the cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry. Combined NK105 treatment with radiation yielded significant superior antitumour activity as compared to combined PTX treatment with radiation (P=0.0277). On the other hand, a histopathological study of lung sections revealed no significant difference in histopathological changes between mice treated with PTX and radiation and those treated with NK105 and radiation. Flow-cytometric analysis showed that NK105-treated LLC tumour cells showed more severe arrest at the G2/M phase as compared to PTX-treated tumour cells. The superior radiosensitising activity of NK105 was thus considered to be attributable to the more severe cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase induced by NK105 as compared to that induced by free PTX. The present study results suggest that further clinical trials are warranted to determine the efficacy and feasibility of combined NK105 therapy with radiation.

The biological effect of pentoxifylline on the survival of human head and neck cancer cells treated with continuous low and high dose-rate irradiation

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the radiosensitivity effect of the G2/M arrest-abrogating substance, pentoxifylline (PTX), with high dose-rate irradiation (HDRI) and low dose-rate irradiation (LDRI), during which DNA repair and cell proliferation occur.

METHODS

Three squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, FaDu, RPMI 2650 and SCC-61, with differences in genomic imbalance and intrinsic radiosensitivity, were irradiated with 140 cGy/min (HDRI) and 0.7 cGy/min (LDRI) in the presence and absence of 2.0 mM PTX. The surviving fraction at 2.0 Gy (SF2) and cell-cycle phase distribution were assessed by DNA flow cytometry analysis and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation.

RESULTS

With HDRI and LDRI the SF2 of FaDu cells decreased by 38.5% and 27.6%, respectively, while the corresponding figures for RPMI 2650 were 28.5% and 48.5%, and for SCC-61 were 44.2% and 28.6%. Increases in G2 populations were evident after both HDRI and LDRI of all cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhancement in the cytotoxic effect of PTX was statistically significant after HDRI as well as after LDRI in all three cell lines. We therefore conclude that PTX in combination with LDRI is worth further study, both in vitro, for disclosing underlying mechanisms, and in vivo, to confirm the findings.

Radiosensitization by oxaliplatin in a mouse adenocarcinoma: influence of treatment schedule

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to investigate if oxaliplatin (1-OHP) could be used as a radiosensitizer in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiments were performed in mice (C3D2F1) bearing a transplanted mammary carcinoma in a foot. Drugs, 1-OHP and cis-diammine-dichloro-platinum (CDDP), were administered i.p. Results were analyzed in terms of tumor growth delay (TGD).

RESULTS

1-OHP and CDDP were tested in single doses of 6 and 10 mg/kg body weight. Administration of either 1-OHP or CDDP produced a significant TGD but only with the dose of 10 mg/kg. Single dose combined X-ray (10 Gy) and 1-OHP (6 and 10 mg/kg) treatments were performed with different sequences and time intervals (1 h, 4 h, and 24 h). All TGDs of these combined treatments were uniform among themselves (indicating that sequence and time interval did not influence the results), and did not depend on the drug dose. In X-ray (10 and 20 Gy) and 1-OHP (6 and 10 mg/kg) combined treatment, the TGDs increased only with X-ray dose. Different 1-OHP administration schedules were performed for fractionated experiments: two treatments every 4 days. The least toxic protocol (1-OHP total dose from 6 to 14 mg/kg) was selected for combined treatments with 10 daily X-ray treatments of 2 Gy. A clear drug dose-effect relationship was observed in those treatments with 1-OHP doses from 10 to 14 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

Although low-dose 1-OHP did not induce a TGD when administered alone, in combined protocols it increased X-ray efficacy.

The use of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck

PURPOSE

Unresectable squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) continue to pose a significant therapeutic challenge. This report defines the toxicities, efficacy, and prognostic factors associated with the combination of carboplatin (CBDCA), paclitaxel, and once-daily radiation for patients with locally advanced disease. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel were investigated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1993-1998, 62 patients with Stage III-IV SCCHN were treated with 70.2 Gy of RT at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day to the primary site. Weekly chemotherapy was given during RT consisting of paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/wk) and CBDCA (100 mg/m(2)/wk). All patients presented with locally advanced disease; 77% had T4 disease and 21% had T3 disease. Fifty-eight percent had N2b-N3 disease.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were evaluable for response and survival with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 7-70). Ninety-eight percent of patients completed prescribed therapy. One patient died after refusing medical management for pseudomembranous colitis and is scored as a Grade 5 toxicity. Two patients suffered Grade 4 leukopenia. Median number of break days was two. A clinical complete response (CR) at the primary site was obtained in 82%, with a total (primary site and neck) CR rate of 75%. The median survival for the entire cohort is 33 months. Response to therapy and status of the neck at presentation were the only prognostic factors found to influence survival. The median survival for patients who attained a CR is 49 months versus 9 months in those who did not attain a CR (p < 0.0001). The 2- and 3-year overall survival for complete responders are 79% and 61%. Plasma paclitaxel concentrations in the range shown to be radiosensitizing were achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel given concurrently with definitive once-daily external beam radiation therapy is well tolerated with over 90% of patients completing prescribed therapy. An ultimate CR rate of greater than 70% was obtained, which translated directly into improved survival. With 48% 3-year overall survival for the entire group, this regimen is an excellent option for this group of patients with a historically poor prognosis.

Enhancement of radiation effects by combined docetaxel and carboplatin treatment in vitro

This study was designed to evaluate the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere) and carboplatin for radiopotentiation in vitro. H460 human lung carcinoma cells were treated with docetaxel (or paclitaxel) for 1 h and rinsed. After 24 h, the cells were treated with carboplatin for 1 h, irradiated, and colony forming ability was assesed. Using various doses of docetaxel with 100 microM carboplatin, the dose enhancement ratio (D.E.R.) for drugs only was 1.26. When 25 nM docetaxel was used with various doses of radiation, the radiation D.E.R. was 1.41. With all three agents combined, and after normalization for combined drug effects, the radiation D.E.R. was 1.55. Similar values were obtained using paclitaxel with these agents. Significant redistribution of cells into the radiosensitive G2/M phase was observed using a dose of paclitaxel (750 nM), which also caused radiation enhancement. However, an equally cytotoxic dose of docetaxel (25 nM) did not result in any cell cycle redistribution; this phenomenon was only observed at higher doses. This study shows that the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin enhance the effects of radiation in vitro more effectively than either drug seperately. In addition, our data show that the mechanism of radiopotentiation by docetaxel probably does not involve a G2/M block in H460 cells.

Hyperthermia and paclitaxel--epirubicin chemotherapy: enhanced cytotoxic effect in a murine mammary adenocarcinoma

Multimodality therapy is considered of great interest in the treatment of locally advanced solid tumours. In previous experiments, paclitaxel (TX) and epirubicin (EP) were combined with different schedules, obtaining a superadditive effect on the growth of a murine mammary carcinoma. In the present study, the authors have analysed the possible use of hyperthermia (HT) to increase the efficacy of TX and EP combinations. Tumours were transplanted into the right hind foot of female hybrid (C3D2F1) mice. Both TX and EP were administered i.p in two different doses. Hyperthermia was applied using a water bath at 43.2 degrees C for 1 h. Results were analysed in terms of Tumour Growth Delay (TGD). The maximum tolerated doses in combined protocols were TX 45 mg/kg and EP 9 mg/kg, with an interval time of 24h between the two administrations. TGDs of some of the schedules performed are reported: EP + HT = 11 days, TX + HT = 16 days, TX + EP (with an interval time of 24 h) = 14 days, and TX + EP + HT = 22 days. In the experimental model, HT significantly increases the effects of both TX and EP. TX + EP + HT treatment is the most effective (significantly different from TX + EP), but not in a significant way when compared to TX + HT treatment. These results suggest the possible use of a TX + HT protocol for local tumour response, whereas EP could be added in order to achieve a better systemic control.

[Combined radiochemotherapy of non-small-cell bronchial carcinoma with taxol]

BACKGROUND

In the last few years platin-based radiochemotherapy has become standard treatment for patients with advanced, surgically unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). More recently new chemotherapeutic agents have shown superior activity. Among them paclitaxel (Taxol) is one of the most extensively investigated.

RADIOTHERAPY

Despite of promising initial results, locally uncontrolled tumor and distant metastases continue to be the most serious problem of this disease. Improvement of local control can be achieved by escalating radiation dose, by shortening of treatment time with accelerated fractionation or by additional use of radiosensitizing agents. Concerning local control a tumor volume-dose relationship has been described. Three-dimensional conformal treatment planning eventually with intensity modulated fields, combined with biological TCP/NTCP calculation models allows risk-adapted escalation and intensification of irradiation.

TAXOL

A radiosensitizing effect of Taxol by means of G2/M block has been reported. However, radiobiological data are contradictory and suggest a radiosensitizing effect even without cell-cycle arrest. For simultaneous paclitaxel and 60 Gy normally fractionated radiotherapy several prospective dose escalation studies have confirmed a maximum weekly Taxol dose of 60 mg/m2. Changes in paclitaxel application (e.g. daily, twice weekly or biweekly) or in radiotherapy fractionation require a corresponding adaption of Taxol dose. Dose limiting toxicity of this simultaneous treatment is esophagitis. With respect to the high rate of distant metastases sequential application of combined chemotherapeutic regimens (e.g. Taxol 200 mg/m2/Carboplat AUC 6) is generally recommended.

Hyperthermia enhances the response of paclitaxel and radiation in a mouse adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to investigate if the efficacy of paclitaxel and paclitaxel-radiation treatments in vivo could be enhanced by hyperthermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paclitaxel was administered i.p. in doses from 30 to 60 mg/kg b.w. to (C3D2F1) mice bearing spontaneous mammary carcinoma. Local hyperthermia (41 degrees, 42 degrees, 43 degrees C) was carried out by immersing tumor-bearing legs in a water bath for 1 h. Single X-ray treatments from 10 to 90 Gy were performed. Tumor growth delay (TGD) or tumor control dose (TCD(50), radiation dose needed to induce local tumor control in 50% of irradiated animals) were the endpoints.

RESULTS

A significant increase of dose-dependent growth delay was observed in paclitaxel and 43 degrees C hyperthermia combined treatments, and a superadditive effect was seen with paclitaxel 45 mg/kg. Combined treatments with hyperthermia at 41 degrees and 42 degrees C were less effective. Administration of paclitaxel 24 h, 4 h, and 15 min before or 15 min and 4 h after hyperthermic treatments produced similar results (TGDs varying from 22.1 to 17 days), and administering paclitaxel 48 h before or 24 h after hyperthermic treatments decreased TGDs (about 10 days). Trimodality treatment (paclitaxel 45 mg/kg, hyperthermia, and X-ray), with a TCD(50) of 14. 1 Gy, in respect to the TCD(50) of 53.1 obtained with X-ray alone, was the most effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia enhanced the effectiveness of paclitaxel in all the tested protocols. Our results show a superadditive effect of paclitaxel 45 mg/kg combined with a hyperthermic treatment of 1 h at 43 degrees C. Trimodality treatment, evaluated in terms of percentage of cures, shows a very high enhancement ratio.