Rapid growth of microscopic rectal cancer as a determinant of response to preoperative radiation therapy

Analysis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer given neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with or without RT dose intensification: A multicenter retrospective study - ATLANTIS part I

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCHT) is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). While there are several data regarding chemotherapy intensification, actually, no reliable data directly comparing different radiotherapy (RT) dose levels are available. The present study aimed to compare intensified RT versus standard dose in patients with LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 12 centers were collected for the current large retrospective study. The primary end-point evaluated whether RT dose intensification was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary end-points explored the relation between RT dose and interval to surgery, downstaging, and RT-related toxicity. Subgroup analysis according to primary tumor stage was also performed.

RESULTS

1028 patients were analysed. All patients received combined RCHT with (364) or without (664) a RT boost. Patients underwent surgery after a median 10 weeks (IQ range 5-28). The overall pCR rate was 21.5 %. In the boost and no-boost groups, the pCR was 26.6 % (97) and 17 % (114) (p = 0.00), respectively. As a subgroup analysis, the pCR stratified by interval to surgery was 10 %, 23 %, 26.3 %, and 39.3 % (p < 0.000) in the boost group versus 10.6 %, 20.8 %, 19.3 %, and 20.4 % (p = 0.018) in the no-boost group. cT3 patients operated on ≥ week 11 and cT4 patients, regardless of time to surgery, received a significant benefit by the RT boost in terms of pCR rate. Patients in the boost group had a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicities (6 % vs. 1.7 %; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that RT dose intensification (boost) in LARC might significantly increase the pCR rate, although with a small increase in acute toxicity. While pCR seems only partially improved by prolonged time to surgery in the no-boost group, a progressive and significant pCR improvement in patients treated with boost over time was observed. RT boost seems to be beneficial only in more advanced primary tumors.

Palliative short-course radiotherapy (RAPASH study) in patients with rectal cancer

Background

Palliative radiation therapy (RT) is used to treat symptomatic rectal cancer although clinical benefits and toxicities are poorly documented. There is no consensus about the optimal RT regimen and clinical practice undergoes significant changes. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of short-course (SC) RT in this setting of patients.

Materials and methods

Charts from patients with locally advanced disease not candidates for standard treatment or with symptomatic metastatic rectal cancer treated with SCRT (25 Gy/5 fractions in 5 consecutive days) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical outcome measures were symptomatic response rate and toxicity.

Results

From January 2007 to December 2017, 59 patients (median age 80 years) received SCRT; 53 were evaluable. The median follow-up was 8 months (range, 1-70). Clinical response to RT for bleeding, pain and tenesmus was 100%, 95% and 89%, respectively. The compliance with the treatment was 100% and no patient experienced acute severe (≥ grade 3) toxicities. Median time to symptoms recurrence was 11 months (range 3-69). Globally, the median overall survival was 12 months.

Conclusions

SCRT is a safe and effective regimen in symptomatic rectal cancer and may be considered the regimen of choice for standard treatment in unfit patients.

Dose-time fractionation schedules of preoperative radiotherapy and timing to surgery for rectal cancer

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is extensively used prior to surgery for rectal cancer to provide significantly better local control, but the radiotherapy (RT), as the other component of CRT, has been subject to less interest than the drug component in recent years. With considerable developments in RT, the use of advanced techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in rectal cancer, is garnering more attention nowadays. The radiation dose can be better conformed to the target volumes with possibilities for synchronous integrated boost without increased complications in normal tissue. Hopefully, both local recurrence and toxicities can be further reduced. Although those seem to be of interest, many issues remain unresolved. There is no international consensus regarding the radiation schedule for preoperative RT for rectal cancer. Moreover, an enormous disparity exists regarding the RT delivery. With the advent of IMRT, variations will likely increase. Moreover, time to surgery is also quite variable, as it depends upon the indication for RT/CRT in the clinical practices. In this review, we discuss the options and problems related to both the dose-time fractionation schedule and time to surgery; furthermore, it addresses the research questions that need answering in the future.

Preoperative Intensity-modulated Chemoradiation Therapy with Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Rectal Cancer: 2-year Follow-up Results of Phase II Study

Background

The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of experimental fractionation using intensity modulated radiation therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) to shorten the overall treatment time without dose escalation in preoperative radiochemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Patients and methods

Between January 2014 and November 2015, a total of 51 patients with operable stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma were treated. The preoperative treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a pelvic dose of 41.8 Gy and simultaneously delivered 46.2 Gy to T2/3 and 48.4 Gy to T4 tumour in 22 fractions, with standard concomitant capecitabine, was completed in 50 patients out of whom 47 were operated. The median follow-up was 35 months.

Results

The rate of acute toxicity G ≥ 3 was 2.4%. The total downstaging rate was 89% and radical resection was achieved in 98% of patients. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was observed in 25.5% of patients, with 2-year local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) of 100% for this patient group. An intention-to-treat analysis revealed pN to be a significant prognostic factor for DFS and OS (P = 0.005 and 0.030, respectively). LC for the entire group was 100%, and 2-year DFS and OS were 90% (95 % CI 98.4–81.6) and 92.2% (95% CI 99.6–84.7), respectively.

Conclusions

The experimental regime in this study resulted in a high rate of pCR with a low acute toxicity profile. Excellent early results translated into encouraging 2-year LC, DFS, and OS.

Preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost combined with Capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer: short-term results of a multicentric study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care in patients with locally advanced, T3-T4 N0-2, rectal cancer (LARC). Given the correlation between RT dose-tumor response and the prognostic role of the tumor regression grade (TRG), treatment intensification represents an area of active investigation. The aim of the study was to analyze the role of RT dose-intensification in the preoperative treatment of LARC in terms of feasibility, efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with LARC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) at five Italian radiation oncology centers. Concurrent Capecitabine was administered. Treatment response was evaluated in terms of disease down-staging and TRG. Acute toxicity was evaluated according to the CTC-AE 4.0 scale.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were identified for this analysis. A dose of 45 Gy was prescribed to the entire mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes with a median SIB dose of 54 Gy (range 52.5-57.5) to the tumor and corresponding mesorectum. Overall, 74/76 (97.4%) patients completed the planned RT, whereas 64/76 (84.2%) patients completed the prescribed CT. Eight (10.5%) patients developed grade 3-4 acute toxicity. Overall, 72/76 patients underwent surgery. The tumor and nodal down-staging was documented in 51 (70.8%) and 43 (67%) patients, respectively. Twenty (27.8%) patients obtained a pathologic complete response. Surgical morbidity was reported in 13/72 patients (18.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although retrospective in design, this study indicates that IMRT-SIB with a dose range of 52.5-57.5 Gy (median 54 Gy) and concomitant Capecitabine appears feasible, well tolerated and effective in terms of disease down-staging and pathological complete response. Long-term toxicity and the impact on disease control and patient survival will be evaluated with a longer follow-up time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NA.

Cyclooxygenase-2: A Role in Cancer Stem Cell Survival and Repopulation of Cancer Cells during Therapy

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an inducible form of the enzyme that catalyses the synthesis of prostanoids, including prostaglandin E2 (PGE₂), a major mediator of inflammation and angiogenesis. COX-2 is overexpressed in cancer cells and is associated with progressive tumour growth, as well as resistance of cancer cells to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These therapies are often delivered in multiple doses, which are spaced out to allow the recovery of normal tissues between treatments. However, surviving cancer cells also proliferate during treatment intervals, leading to repopulation of the tumour and limiting the effectiveness of the treatment. Tumour cell repopulation is a major cause of treatment failure. The central dogma is that conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy selects resistant cancer cells that are able to reinitiate tumour growth. However, there is compelling evidence of an active proliferative response, driven by increased COX-2 expression and downstream PGE₂ release, which contribute to the repopulation of tumours and poor patient outcome. In this review, we will examine the evidence for a role of COX-2 in cancer stem cell biology and as a mediator of tumour repopulation that can be molecularly targeted to overcome resistance to therapy.

Gender-related significance of time interval between radiotherapy and surgery in hypofractionated preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients' survival

AIM AND BACKGROUND

An optimal break between radiotherapy (RT) and surgery in short-course of RT (SCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer is not clearly established. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the break in the preoperative SCRT and overall treatment time (OTT) for locally advanced rectal cancer patients (whole group and male/female subgroups) on patients overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

131 patients were treated with SCRT (5 Gy/5 days), followed by surgery 3-53 days later. Break was calculated as the time interval between the end of irradiation to surgery and OTT as time interval from the beginning of RT to surgery.

RESULTS

Mean break was 21.5 (range 3-53.0) days and mean OTT was 26.5 (range 7-58.0) days. In univariate analysis, a break longer than 15 days and OTT >23 days were negative prognostic factors for OS for all patients, and particularly for the male patients' subgroup. RFS was non-significantly higher (P = 0.066) for patients treated with a break ≤15 days and OTT ≤23 days (P = 0.099), irrespectively of patients' sex. Patients treated with a break longer than 15 days and OTT >23 days had non-significantly lower level of MFS than those treated with a shorter break (P = 0.269) and OTT ≤23 days (P = 0.498).

CONCLUSION

In SCRT, a break in the treatment longer than 15 days, especially in the male patients subgroup, should be avoided, because it negatively affects patients' survival.

Cell death-stimulated cell proliferation: a tissue regeneration mechanism usurped by tumors during radiotherapy

The death of all the cancer cells in a tumor is the ultimate goal of cancer therapy. Therefore, much of the current effort in cancer research is focused on activating cellular machinery that facilitates cell death such as factors involved in causing apoptosis. However, recently, a number of studies point to some counterintuitive roles for apoptotic caspases in radiation therapy as well as in tissue regeneration. It appears that a major function of apoptotic caspases is to facilitate tissue regeneration and tumor cell repopulation during cancer therapy. Because tumor cell repopulation has been shown to be important for local tumor relapse, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind tumor repopulation would be important to enhance cancer radiotherapy. In this review, we discuss our current knowledge of these potentially paradigm-changing phenomena and mechanisms in various organisms and their implications on the development of novel cancer therapeutics and strategies.

Optimal Time Intervals between Pre-Operative Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery in Rectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND

In rectal cancer therapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (RT/CRT) is extensively used pre-operatively to (i) decrease local recurrence risks, (ii) allow radical surgery in non-resectable tumors, and (iii) increase the chances of sphincter-saving surgery or (iv) organ-preservation. There is a growing interest among clinicians and scientists to prolong the interval from the RT/CRT to surgery to achieve maximal tumor regression and to diminish complications during surgery.

METHODS

The pros and cons of delaying surgery depending upon the aim of the pre-operative RT/CRT are critically evaluated.

RESULTS

Depending upon the clinical situation, the need for a time interval prior to surgery to allow tumor regression varies. In the first and most common situation (i), no regression is needed and any delay beyond what is needed for the acute radiation reaction in surrounding tissues to wash out can potentially only be deleterious. After short-course RT (5Gyx5) with immediate surgery, the ideal time between the last radiation fraction is 2-5 days, since a slightly longer interval appears to increase surgical complications. A delay beyond 4 weeks appears safe; it results in tumor regression including pathologic complete responses, but is not yet fully evaluated concerning oncologic outcome. Surgical complications do not appear to be influenced by the CRT-surgery interval within reasonable limits (about 4-12 weeks), but this has not been sufficiently explored. Maximum tumor regression may not be seen in rectal adenocarcinomas until after several months; thus, a longer than usual delay may be of benefit in well responding tumors if limited or no surgery is planned, as in (iii) or (iv), otherwise not.

CONCLUSION

A longer time interval after CRT is undoubtedly of benefit in some clinical situations but may be counterproductive in most situations. After short-course RT, long-term results from the clinical trials are not yet available to routinely recommend an interval longer than 2-5 days, unless the tumor is non-resectable at diagnosis.

Progress in rectal cancer treatment

The dramatic improvement in local control of rectal cancer observed during the last decades is to be attributed to attention to surgical technique and to the introduction of neoadjuvant therapy regimens. Nevertheless, systemic relapse remains frequent and is currently insufficiently addressed. Intensification of neoadjuvant therapy by incorporating chemotherapy with or without targeted agents before the start of (chemo)radiation or during the waiting period to surgery may present an opportunity to improve overall survival. An increasing number of patients can nowadays undergo sphincter preserving surgery. In selected patients, local excision or even a "wait and see" approach may be feasible following active neoadjuvant therapy. Molecular and genetic biomarkers as well as innovative imaging techniques may in the future allow better selection of patients for this treatment option. Controversy persists concerning the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy after neoadjuvant regimens. The currently available evidence suggests that in complete pathological responders long-term outcome is excellent and adjuvant therapy may be omitted. The results of ongoing trials will help to establish the ideal tailored approach in resectable rectal cancer.

Delayed surgery for rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a promising method in its infancy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer before surgery. Accumulating data suggest that tumor response to nCRT is time dependent. A delay between nCRT and surgery may increase the proportion of patients that achieve a favorable response. However, delayed surgery beyond 6-8 weeks may increase the technical difficulty, and the risks of surgical complications and recurrence or metastasis. This article briefly reviews the relevant literature to evaluate the efficiency and safety of delayed surgery.

METHODS

Two non-cohort studies and 10 cohort studies were reviewed. The results were analyzed and the limitations discussed.

RESULTS

Although debatable, the findings of the included studies are promising. Delayed surgery may increase the proportion of favorable tumor response without compromising prognosis. However, most of the studies were retrospective, which introduces bias into the evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Delayed surgery is potentially useful, but this needs to be verified by further well-designed prospective trials.

Radiation dose-response model for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is part of the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancers. Tumor regression at the time of operation is desirable, but not much is known about the relationship between radiation dose and tumor regression. In the present study we estimated radiation dose-response curves for various grades of tumor regression after preoperative CRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 222 patients, treated with consistent chemotherapy and radiation therapy techniques, were considered for the analysis. Radiation therapy consisted of a combination of external-beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy. Response at the time of operation was evaluated from the histopathologic specimen and graded on a 5-point scale (TRG1-5). The probability of achieving complete, major, and partial response was analyzed by ordinal logistic regression, and the effect of including clinical parameters in the model was examined. The radiation dose-response relationship for a specific grade of histopathologic tumor regression was parameterized in terms of the dose required for 50% response, D50,i, and the normalized dose-response gradient, γ50,i.

RESULTS

A highly significant dose-response relationship was found (P=.002). For complete response (TRG1), the dose-response parameters were D50,TRG1=92.0 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.3-144.9 Gy), γ50,TRG1=0.982 (CI 0.533-1.429), and for major response (TRG1-2) D50,TRG1&2=72.1 Gy (CI 65.3-94.0 Gy), γ50,TRG1&2=0.770 (CI 0.338-1.201). Tumor size and N category both had a significant effect on the dose-response relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated a significant dose-response relationship for tumor regression after preoperative CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer for tumor dose levels in the range of 50.4-70 Gy, which is higher than the dose range usually considered.

Gender-related differences in repopulation and early tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

Inhibition of tumor proliferation rate based on bromodeoxyuridine labelling index (BrdUrdLI), S-phase fraction (SPF) and MIB-1 labelling index (MIB-1 LI) as an early rectal cancer response to preoperative radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 122 patients qualified either for short RT (5 Gy/fraction/5 days) and surgery about 1 week after RT (schedule I) or for short RT and a 4-week interval before surgery (schedule II). Tumor samples were taken twice from each patient: before RT and at the time of surgery. In each sample, the BrdUrdLI, SPF and MIB-1 were calculated. Early tumor response was assessed by a biologist, a pathologist and surgeons.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were treated according to schedule I and 66 patients according to schedule II. Mean BrdUrdLI, SPF and MIB-1 LI before RT were 8.8%, 21.0% and 53.3%, respectively, and these values did not differ between the two compared groups. After RT, tumors showed statistically significant growth inhibition based on all assessed biological markers. As pretreatment assessed parameter was not predictive for early clinical and pathologic tumor response, prognostic role of the relative value (RV), that is, the ratio of assessed parameter after RT to before RT for each of the assessed markers, was considered. The ratios were calculated separately for fast and slowly proliferating tumors and separately for male and female patients. Fast proliferating tumors were more responsive. Differences with regard to sex were visible only in slowly proliferating tumors. Accelerated cell repopulation (4.8-28%/day) was noticed in female slowly proliferating tumors about 4 weeks after RT. Only for relative MIB-1 LI it was possible to show significant correlation with pathological tumor regression. Lack of such correlation for BrdUrdLI and SPF might reflect accelerated repopulation, particularly in slowly proliferating female tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated repopulation was noticed in slowly proliferating tumors in females about 4 weeks after RT.

Future directions in neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer: maximizing pathological complete response rates

Neoadjuvant therapy is widely accepted as the current standard of care for localized rectal cancer. Downstaging of disease has been significantly improved and pathological complete response rates (pCR) which were historically below 10% with preoperative radiation alone, now range from 15% to 30% with preoperative chemo-radiation. While the availability of new chemotherapeutic drugs (Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, etc.) and molecular targeted agents (Bevacizamab, Cetuximab, etc.) hold a great deal of promise, results of recent studies indicate that the pCR rate with neoadjuvant therapy appears to have plateaued at 20-30%. The use of more intensive multidrug combinations has, however, significantly increased the toxicity of treatment. New paradigms in neoadjuvant therapy are therefore needed to further improve results of treatment. This review presents strategies for neoadjuvant therapy, with the potential to improve pCR rates and also survival of patients.

Moderately Low Alpha/Beta Ratio for Rectal Cancer May Best Explain the Outcome of Three Fractionation Schedules of Preoperative Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To estimate the alpha/beta ratio for rectal cancer according to the outcome of three fractionation schedules of preoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1996 and 2002, 168 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated as follows: 53 patients received 25 Gy in 5 Gy per fraction, 45 received 30 Gy in 3.0 Gy per fraction, and 70 were treated with accelerated hyperfractionation (42 Gy, 1.5 Gy per fraction, given twice daily). No patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The clinical characteristics of the groups were comparable. Surgery was performed shortly after radiotherapy. Crude data on locoregional tumor control were fitted directly using a linear-quadratic model, and the actuarial data were analyzed using Cox model.

RESULTS

A linear-quadratic model provided an alpha estimate of 0.339 (SE 0.115) and beta estimate of 0.067 (SE 0.027), which resulted in an alpha/beta ratio of 5.06 Gy (95% confidence interval -0.1 to 10.3). In all three schemes the overall radiation treatment time was short, which limits the rationales for incorporating time effect into the model. If, however, time was incorporated the alpha/beta ratio was 11.1 Gy and the dose increment required to compensate for repopulation was 0.15 Gy/day. The actuarial analysis provided similar alpha/beta estimates.

CONCLUSION

Although because of the retrospective character of the study, nonrandomized selection of fractionation schedule, and uncontrolled quality of surgery the present results can be regarded as hypothesis generating only, the control rates obtained in the pelvis are consistent with a moderately low alpha/beta ratio for rectal cancer.

Is there a limit to dose escalation for rectal cancer?

The radiation tolerance of the rectum is not fully understood. Published studies on the radiation treatment of cancers of the prostate, cervix and rectum have been reviewed to determine currently recommended dose-volume guidelines. The need for further studies directed specifically at the treatment of primary rectal cancer and perirectal node metastases is discussed. There seems to be room for escalation of the external beam doses currently given.

Bromodeoxyuridine labeling index as an indicator of early tumor response to preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Assessment of tumor proliferation rate using Bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (BrdUrdLI) as a possible predictor of rectal cancer response to preoperative radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Ninety-two patients were qualified either to short RT (5 Gy/fraction/5 days) and surgery about 1 week after RT (schedule I), or to short RT and 4-5 weeks interval before surgery (schedule II). Tumor samples were taken twice from each patient: before RT and at the time of surgery. The samples were incubated with BrdUrd for 1 h at 37 degrees C, and the BrdUrdLI was calculated as a percentage of BrdUrd-labeled cells.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were treated according to schedule I and 54 patients according to schedule II. Mean BrdUrdLI before RT was 8.5% and its value did not differ between the patients in the two compared groups. After RT tumors showed statistically significant growth inhibition (reduction of BrdUrdLI). As the pretreatment BrdUrd LI was not predictive for early clinical and pathologic tumor response, prognostic role of the ratio of BrdUrdLI after to BrdUrdLI before RT was considered. The ratios were calculated separately for fast (BrdUrd LI>8.5%) and slowly (BrdUrd LI<or=8.5%) proliferating tumors and correlated with overall treatment time (OTT, i.e., time from the first day of RT to surgery). One month after RT, accelerated proliferation was observed only in slowly proliferating tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment BrdUrdLI was not predictive for early clinical and pathologic tumor response. The ratio after/before RT BrdUrdLI was correlated to inhibition of proliferation in responsive tumors.

Effects of Two Conventional Preoperative Radiation Schedules on Anastomotic Healing in the Rat Colon

BACKGROUND

Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is an increasingly popular form of adjunct therapy for rectal cancer; however, little is known about its effects on matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression in colonic anastomotic healing.

METHODS

Wistar rats were irradiated to a total dose of 25 or 40 Gy. Four days after the end of RT, an end-to-end colorectal anastomosis was performed. Animals were sacrificed at 1, 3, and 7 days after the anastomosis. A control group was studied similarly, but was not irradiated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in peritonitis rate and anastomotic complications. The average bursting pressure and breaking strength were only reduced significantly in the rats irradiated with 40 Gy. However, the concentration and the content of hydroxyproline in anastomotic tissues were unchanged. In irradiated rats, MMP-2 and MMP-9 were significantly increased at 40 Gy, but not at 25 Gy. On the other hand, 25-Gy irradiation induced a smaller increase in the levels of the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 compared with the controls.

CONCLUSION

Anastomotic strength is adversely affected by high-dose fractionated preoperative RT. In contrast, preoperative RT at 25 Gy in five fractions over 5 days is safe with regard to the maintenance of wound strength in colorectal anastomosis.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation versus hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. The exact role of the addition of chemotherapy is not established. We compared neoadjuvant therapy using chemoradiation (CRT) or hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART).

METHODS

Clinical, pathological, and survival data were obtained from patients with resectable stage II or III rectal cancer within 7 cm from the anal verge. A group of 50 patients was treated with a preoperative dose of 41.6 Gy of radiotherapy (RT) in two daily fractions of 1.6 Gy over 13 days immediately followed by surgery (HART). A second group of 96 patients received 45 Gy of conventionally fractionated RT in 25 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy combined with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy followed by surgery within 4 to 6 weeks (CRT). Both groups were compared in terms of morbidity, pathological downstaging, local recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of preoperative clinicopathological variables. The mean distance from the anal verge was 5.8 cm (HART) versus 4.9 cm (CRT). Sphincter preservation was possible in 74% (HART) versus 83.5% (CRT) of patients (P = .013). The clinical anastomotic leak rate was 2% (HART) versus 2.2% (CRT). Pathological complete response was observed in 4% (HART) versus 18% (CRT) of the resected specimens (P = .002). A pelvic recurrence developed in 6% (HART) versus 4.4% (CRT) of patients (P = .98). Overall 5-year survival was 58% (HART) versus 66% (CRT) (P = .19); disease-free 5-year survival was 51% (HART) versus 62% (CRT) (P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with preoperative HART followed by immediate surgery, preoperative CRT followed by a 6-week waiting period enhances pathological response and increases sphincter preservation rate. This could be explained by the addition of chemotherapy or the longer interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. No statistically significant difference was observed in local control or overall survival.

Phase II Trial of Preoperative Chemoradiation With a Hyperfractionated Radiation Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this phase II study was to prospectively determine the efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation with a hyperfractionated (Hfx) RT boost to 61.8 Gy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Eligibility stipulated that the primary lesion had to be either T4; or T3 and >4 cm or 40% of the bowel circumference. Radiation (RT) consisted of 45 Gy to the pelvis (1.8 Gy per fraction) followed by 1.2 Gy twice daily (to the gross tumor volume) to a total RT dose of 61.8 Gy. There was 5-FU infused at 1 g/m2/24 hours for 4 days during the 1st and 6th weeks of RT (concurrent with the Hfx boost). Surgical resection was planned 4 to 6 weeks later. Adjuvant chemotherapy (bolus 5-FU/leucovorin) was scheduled for 4 cycles at 28-day intervals.

RESULTS

There were 22 patients, ages 22 to 81 years (median, 64) enrolled in the study. Of the 20 patients evaluable for response, 10 (50%) had evidence of clinical downstaging and 5 patients (25%) had > or =90% fibrosis in the resected specimen. With a median f/u of 40 months (7-158), the 4 years actuarial rate for all patients (n = 22) of OS was 64%, of DFS 62%, and of LC 84%. 3/21 patients (14%) had positive margins, all of whom developed a local failure (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This regimen of high dose preoperative chemoRT with a Hfx RT boost (to 61.8 Gy) in patients with bulky, locally advanced rectal cancer results in clinical downstaging in half of the patients with significant fibrosis in the operative specimen.

A pilot study of accelerated preoperative hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation with or without low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose preoperative prophylactic liver irradiation (PLI) combined with preoperative accelerated hyperfractionated pelvic irradiation (HART) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2003 62 patients were enrolled: 38 (61%) received HART and 24 (39%) HART+PLI. The pelvis was irradiated twice a day, with a minimal interfraction interval of 6h: the total dose of 42 Gy was given in 1.5 Gy per fractions over 18 days. The PLI (14 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 1.4 Gy) was given simultaneously with the morning fraction of HART. Twenty patients (32%), including 7 in PLI group, received 5-Fu based postoperative chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In general, acute normal tissue reactions appeared tolerable irrespectively of PLI. Six to twelve months after completion of combined therapy the mean ALAT levels in patients treated with HART alone (25 pts), HART+chemotherapy (13 pts), HART+PLI (17 pts), and HART+PLI+chemotherapy (7 pts) were 15, 21, 26 and 55 IU/l, respectively. A mild increase of ALAT levels observed in the HART+PLI+chemotherapy sub-group was non-symptomatic. Three-year actuarial loco-regional control rate in a group of 62 patients was 94%. None of the patients who received PLI developed metastases during the follow-up, compared to 10 out of 38 patients (26%) with no PLI. A difference in metastases-free survival in favor of HART+PLI can be, however, attributed to selection of patients for PLI who were in better general health and stage of disease than those treated with HART.

CONCLUSIONS

Further use of PLI may be limited due to asymptomatic, but detectable biochemical changes of liver function when PLI is sequentially combined with chemotherapy. HART, on the other hand, provides acceptable rate of local control, and is well tolerated, also when combined with postoperative chemotherapy.

Preoperative hyper-fractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) immediately followed by surgery. A prospective phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aim to report on local control in a phase II trial on preoperative hyper-fractionated and accelerated radiotherapy schedule (HART) in locally advanced resectable rectal cancer (LARC). This fractionation schedule was designed to keep the overall treatment time (OTT) as short as possible.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective trial on patients with UICC stages II and III rectal cancer. The patients were submitted to a total dose of 41.6 Gy, delivered in 2.5 weeks at 1.6 Gy per fraction twice a day with a 6-h interfraction interval. Surgery was performed within 1 week after the end of irradiation. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in a subset of patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy nine patients were entered and 250 are fully assessable, with a median follow-up of 39 months. The 5-years actuarial local control (LC) rate is 91.7%. The overall survival (OS) is 59.6%. The freedom from disease relapse (FDR) is 71.5%. Downstaging was observed in 38% of the tumors.

CONCLUSION

The actuarial LC at 5 years is 91.7%, although we are dealing with stages II-III LARC, mainly located in the lower rectum (median distance = 5 cm). The pattern of failure is dominated by distant metastases and treatment intensification will obviously require a systemic approach.

Postoperative Adjuvant Radio(Chemo)Therapy for Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal

Aims and background

Rectal cancer can be considered a broad-spectrum disease, where the surgeon, radiation oncologist and medical oncologist have a peculiar and specific place in order to work harmoniously as a good orchestra. The reality in common general hospitals is far from that of comprehensive cancer centers, particularly for postoperative approaches. The adjuvant therapy of rectal cancer is not codified worldwide, and it is strongly dependent on preoperative staging procedures, surgeon's acts and pathologist's decisions. Starting from our 10-year experience, we analyzed the various steps of postoperative approaches, defining possible decision errors, the incongruity of some attitudes, and the lack of knowledge of recent achievements of science in this disease.

Methods

A total of 194 patients with advanced surgically removed rectal cancer (pT3-4 pNO - any pT pN+) treated with postoperative radio(chemo)therapy was reviewed retrospectively. Anterior resection was performed in 126, abdominoperineal resection in 48, and other surgical procedures in 20 patients. Irradiation was conducted with a single daily fraction of 1.8 Gy until 45 Gy, and chemotherapy consisted of the combination of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (Machover schedule): 47% of patients with positive nodes did not receive chemotherapy.

Results

Five-year overall survival was 60.6% and relapse-free survival was 55.5%. The main prognostic factors were pathological T and N stages. The principal route of progression was distant metastases. Acute toxicity was severe in 1 case (drug toxic hepatitis) and very severe in 16 patients, and late severe sequelae appeared in 13 patients.

Conclusions

The outcome of rectal cancer patients has not changed during the last decade, and this was confirmed in our study. The improvement of radiotherapy techniques has reduced the adverse acute and late toxicity. The best postsurgical approach for pT3pN0 cancer remains unsolved, as the good chemotherapy combination and the real solution could be the application of a new Consensus Conference.

Where next with preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer?

PURPOSE

The basic question for radiation oncologists is what we hope to achieve from treatments that are adjuvant to surgery: better local (pelvic) control and, hopefully, because of that, fewer metastases. Chemotherapy could add to the local effect of irradiation and may also decrease distant metastases directly. Selection criteria for individual treatment could enhance the therapeutic index.

LOCAL CONTROL

Total mesorectal excision reduces the incidence of local recurrence, but preoperative (chemo) radiation is still indicated for more advanced tumors (T3-T4) and for lymph node involvement. Pelvic recurrences arise from tumor clonogens residual beyond the surgical margins. Thus, the practice of shrinking fields to boost the dose to the primary tumor makes no sense, except for tumors that invade residual structures, such as the sacrum. Subclinical disease beyond the future surgical margins grows more quickly than the primary tumor, and hence treatment should be as intense as tolerable. A short treatment course (e.g. 5 x 5 Gy) is desirable, but this regimen, which is currently the gold standard, should be compared (as in the recently closed randomized Polish trial) with higher-dose, longer-duration chemoradiotherapy regimens. The recently closed EORTC trial 22921 examines the benefit of pre- and postoperative chemotherapy combined with a long schedule of radiation. Likewise, continuous infusion of a cycle-active agent rather than bolus administration is a logical addition to radiation therapy in the treatment of fast-growing subclinical tumor extensions.

SYSTEMIC DISEASE

The reduction in distant metastasis rates attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy varies greatly among reports. If the reduction is of the order of 10-25%, the efficacy of chemotherapy equates to as little as about 5 to 12.5 Gy and not more than 20 Gy of total body irradiation.

INTERVAL BETWEEN RADIATION THERAPY AND POSTRADIATION SURGERY

Early excision after preoperative irradiation would be desirable if the primary tumor were still disseminating viable metastatic clonogens. Most tumors do not metastasize until they contain enough viable clonogens to render them clinically detectable. A dose of 10 Gy in 2 Gy fractions reduces at least 30-fold the absolute number of viable clonogens in the primary tumor, to levels that do not yield metastases from the untreated tumor. After a dose of 44-50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, there is little chance that the surviving tumor clonogens could regrow to a metastasis-yielding volume in any reasonable radiation-surgery interval. Thus there is no tumor-related necessity for early postradiation surgery. The importance of the interval between radiation and surgery is currently being addressed in a Swedish randomized trial.

PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE CHARACTERIZATION

Tumor volume should be included in the staging system. There are many tumor- and host-related characteristics that can be used to fingerprint the tumor to help select appropriate individual treatment.

The role of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer

Radiotherapy has an important role to play when used in addition to surgery in primary and recurrent rectal cancer. In primary resectable rectal cancer, a large number of randomized trials have shown that preoperative radiotherapy can slightly improve survival and can decrease local recurrence rates by more than half. Postoperative radiotherapy may also decrease the risk of local failure although with less efficacy. A preoperative schedule of 5 Gy/day for 5 out of 7 days is a convenient and low-toxic treatment, provided it is not given with 2 beams to large volumes, and it appears to be at least as effective as postoperative radiochemotherapy, generally meaning 6 months of therapy with 5 weeks of radiation. The schedule of 5 Gy/day for 5 days also reduces local recurrences with total mesorectal excision. It is unlikely that preoperative radiochemotherapy will substantially increase the chances of a sphincter-preserving procedure in a low-lying rectal cancer and that the long-term function will be adequate even if this is believed by many. In primary nonresectable or locally recurrent rectal cancer, preoperative radiotherapy may downsize or downstage the tumor so that it can be resected. Scientific support that radiochemotherapy is more efficient than radiotherapy alone in this situation is weak.

Radiobiological indices that consider volume: a review

Understanding and predicting the impact of any radiotherapy treatment is critical if patients are to receive treatment with a high likelihood of eliminating the tumour and low likelihood of complications. One of the major contributing factors in determining these effects is the volume treated. This review assesses the current use and accuracy of a series of models which consider volume, building on a previous review which investigated the impact of fractionation particularly with respect to the linear quadratic model. Volume is particularly important in assessing the overall effect with respect to destroying the clonogenic cells and preventing damage to the normal tissues. Dose volume histograms are one of the simplest and most useful forms of representing volume information, however it is difficult to correlate plans based only on DVHs. For this reason various reduction schemes have been introduced and tumour control probability and normal tissues complication probability models adjusted to use this information. Many of these models have proved quite useful in the clinic although they are limited by the available radiobiological data.

The role of radiotherapy in rectal cancer

In Europe, short-term radiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of rectal cancer. In the United States, postoperative chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of choice. The rationale and indications for radiotherapy and possible combinations with chemotherapy are discussed and an overview of all of the randomised trials containing radiotherapy as one randomisation arm is given. Three major indications for radiotherapy can be identified: the reduction of local recurrences in mobile rectal cancer, downstaging of the tumour in primary irresectable tumours and downsizing of low-lying tumours in attempts to more frequently perform a sphincter-saving procedure. For reduction of local recurrences, radiotherapy can be given either pre- or postoperatively, although preoperative therapy is more dose-efficient. Short-term preoperative radiotherapy reduces the number of recurrences and improves survival. Improved survival is also reported after postoperative radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, however, the relevance of the radiotherapy component is discussed. Although the debate about radiotherapy is still ongoing, we strongly believe that the results demonstrate that short-term preoperative radiotherapy is the treatment of choice for resectable rectal cancer.

An experimental evaluation of three preoperative radiation regimens for resectable rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the degree of tumor cell killing after radiotherapy regimens commonly used in clinical practice in comparison with an accelerated schedule.

METHODS

Mtln3 mammary adenocarcinoma tumor cells were inoculated subcutaneously in the hind leg of syngeneic Fischer 344 rats. Tumors were irradiated with 5 x 5 Gy in 5 days, 10 x 3 Gy over 10 days, or 5 x (2 x 3) Gy in 5 days. After excision of the irradiated tumors, the dye exclusion, a tetrazolium-based colorimetric and the clonogenic assays were used to determine tumor cell viability and surviving fractions.

RESULTS

Estimated potential doubling time values indicate a rapid proliferation capacity, comparable with potential doubling time values in human rectal cancer. The dye exclusion and clonogenic assays revealed a significantly higher degree of cell killing after the hypofractionated and the accelerated regimens of, respectively, 5 x 5 Gy and 5 x (2 x 3) Gy over 5 days compared with 10 x 3 Gy over 10 days.

CONCLUSIONS

A shorter treatment time offered the best therapeutic efficacy. The schedule involving two daily fractions of 3 Gy over 5 days should be less toxic than 5 x 5 Gy and may therefore provide a therapeutic advantage.

Radiotherapy in rectal cancer

Radiotherapy has an established role in the treatment of rectal cancer. In primary resectable cancer, numerous randomised trials have shown that particularly pre-operative, and to some extent also postoperative, radiotherapy substantially reduces the risk of local failure. This is seen also with total mesorectal excision. Secondary to the reduction in local failures, there is also a slight improvement in survival after pre-operative radiotherapy or postoperative radiochemotherapy. Using appropriate techniques, the morbidity of radiotherapy is low. In non-resectable cancer, radiotherapy may cause down-staging, allow surgery, and may cure some patients. Whether radiochemotherapy is more efficient has yet to be firmly established. The role of pre-operative radio(chemo)therapy to permit more sphincter-preserving procedures with adequate long-term function is not defined.

Estimation for paired binomial data with application to radiation therapy

We compare and contrast several different methods for estimating the effect of treatment when responses are paired binomial observations. The ratio of binomial probabilities is the parameter of interest, while the binomial probabilities are nuisance parameters which may vary between pairs. The application is a meta-analysis of the treatment of rectal cancer, with observations in each study indicating the number of recurrences of the cancer in each of two groups, one with radiation therapy and one without. The ratio of the probabilities of recurrence in the radiation to non-radiation groups is of substantive interest, and is modelled as a logistic or complementary log-log function of an unknown linear combination of the covariates. The three methods we consider are maximum likelihood, a Bayesian approach and an approach based on estimating equations. For the MLE and Bayesian approach the potentially large number of nuisance parameters are estimated together with the parameters of interest, whereas for the estimating equation approach only the parameters of interest are estimated. A simulation study is performed to compare the methods and evaluate the impact of overdispersion.

Optimising treatment for resectable rectal cancer: is preoperative therapy beneficial?

Preoperative radiotherapy is becoming the standard of care for resectable locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Its practice is no longer limited to a few specialised cancer centres. Adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the risk of local recurrence by 50% compared with surgery alone and it has a moderate effect in improving survival. Treatment-related toxicity is superior to that after postoperative radiotherapy. Early results of preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy are promising, with a low toxicity profile and a high pathological response rate. Advances in technology, endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging enable selection of appropriate patients for preoperative radiotherapy.

Polymorphisms of the repeated sequences in the enhancer region of the thymidylate synthase gene promoter may predict downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an important target enzyme for the fluoropyrimidines. TS gene promoter possesses regulatory tandemly repeated (TR) sequences that are polymorphic in humans, depending on ethnic factors. These polymorphisms have been reported to influence TS expression. TS expression levels affect tumor downstaging after preoperative fluoruracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging correlates with improved local control and disease-free survival. The aim of this study is to correlate TR polymorphisms with downstaging and disease-free survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients with rectal cancer underwent tumor resection after preoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation. Tumor downstaging was evaluated by comparing the pretreatment T stage with the pathologic stage observed in the surgical specimen. TS polymorphism genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the corresponding TS promoter region, and products of amplification were electrophoresed, obtaining products of 220 bp (2/2), 248 bp (3/3), or both (2/3). The TS polymorphism genotype results were subsequently compared with the downstaging observed and with disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Patients who were homozygous for triple TR (3/3) had a lower probability of downstaging than patients who were homozygous with double TR or heterozygous patients (2/2 and 2/3): 22% versus 60% (P =.036; logistic regression). Furthermore, a trend toward improved 3-year disease-free survival was detected in the 2/2 and 2/3 groups, compared with that in the 3/3 group (81% v 41%; P =.17).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that TS repetitive-sequence polymorphisms are predictive for tumor downstaging. TR sequences in TS promoter may be useful as a novel means of predicting response to preoperative 5-FU-based chemoradiation.

Preoperative chemoradiation in fixed distal rectal cancer: dose time factors for pathological complete response

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemoradiation is being utilized extensively in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, a variety of dose time factors in both delivery of chemotherapy and irradiation remain to be established. This study was undertaken to examine the impact of dose time factors on pathological complete response (pCR) rates following preoperative chemoradiation for fixed rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-three patients with fixed rectal cancers were treated with combined 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy and pelvic radiation. Twenty-one patients received bolus 5-FU during the first 3-5 days of radiation and repeated on days 28-33 of their radiation treatment. Twelve patients were treated with continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU, 225 mg/m(2) for the duration of the pelvic radiation. Fifteen patients received a planned total radiation dose of 45 to 50 Gy and 18 patients received a dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Surgical resection was then carried out 6-8 weeks after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

Diarrhea was the most frequent acute toxicity. Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in 6 patients requiring treatment interruption and was not related to the chemotherapy regimen. There was no Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. pCR was observed in 2 of 21 (10%) patients treated with bolus 5-FU as compared to 8 of 12 (67%) for patients treated with CI (p = 0.002). pCR were observed in 8 of 18 (44%) patients receiving radiation dose > or = 5500 cGy as compared to 2 of 15 (13%) patients treated to a dose < or = 5000 cGy (p = 0.05). In the high-dose radiation (> or = 5500 cGy) group, a significant difference in pCR rate was observed in patients treated with CI, 8 of 12 (67%) (p = 0.017) as compared with bolus 5-FU (0 of 6). There was no significant difference in operative morbidity or in wound healing between patients treated with bolus 5-FU or CI or within the groups treated with low or high doses of radiation. Three patients have developed local recurrence at 14 and 24 months, two in the low-dose group treated with bolus 5-FU and one patient in the CVI group. The overall 5-year survival for the whole group is 71%.

CONCLUSION

Dose intensity of 5-FU and dose of radiation correlate significantly with the likelihood of achieving a pCR. Continuous infusion 5-FU (CI) and a preoperative radiation dose of 5500 cGy or higher can achieve pCR rates of approximately 50%, even in fixed cancers of the rectum.

Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of pre-operative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer (T3-T4).

METHODS

Forty-seven patients were assessed (38 T3 and nine T4 tumours). Pre-operative pelvic radiotherapy was delivered in four fields, 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was delivered 500 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3 and days 22, 23, 24. Total mesorectal excision of the rectal tumour either by anterior or abdomino-perineal resection was planned at 4-6 weeks from completion of pre-operative treatment. Response to therapy was assessed by fresh macroscopic measurement of the surgical specimen.

RESULTS

All patients undergoing chemoradiation completed therapy as planned, with no treatment-related interruptions. The regimen had a low acute toxicity profile with an estimated 50% or greater response in 38 out of 47 patients (four patients had complete responses). Forty-three (97%) of 44 patients who underwent surgery were operable. Patients who were operated on between 4 and 7 weeks had a statistically better response then those who were operated on after 7 weeks (P = 0.013; Fisher's exact test). Eight of 10 patients who were considered to be inoperable prior to the treatment underwent total mesorectal excision with negative radial margins. Anastomotic leakage occurred in four patients (9%); one required surgical intervention. Wound infection occurred in three patients (6%); one patient required re-exploration for haemorrhage. Delayed complications occurred in three patients (6%); one requiring surgery for a stomal stricture. After a median follow-up of 20 months, two patients (4%) had developed local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The pre-operative chemoradiation regimen employed had a low acute toxicity profile and all patients completed therapy. The majority of patients considered inoperable prior to receiving this treatment underwent successful excision. Appropriately fractionated pre-operative chemoradiotherapy is a reasonable option in this disease and deserves further evaluation.