The antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine in mice is mediated through serotonergic, noradrenergic and opioid mechanisms

3,3-Dibromoflavanone, a synthetic flavonoid derivative for pain management with antidepressant-like effects and fewer side effects than those of morphine in mice

In the pursuit of new lead compounds with fewer side effects than opioids, the novel synthetic phytochemical core, 3,3-dibromoflavanone (3,3-DBF), has emerged as a promising candidate for pain management. Acute assays demonstrated dose-dependent central and peripheral antinociceptive activity of 3,3-DBF through the μ-opioid receptor. This study aimed to explore repeated administration effects of 3,3-DBF in mice and compare them with morphine. Mice were treated with 3,3-DBF (30 mg/kg), morphine (6 mg/kg), or vehicle for 10 days, alongside single-treatment groups. Unlike morphine, 3,3-DBF demonstrated antinociceptive effects in the hot plate test without inducing tolerance. Locomotor activity and motor coordination tests (evaluated through the inverted screen and rotarod tests) revealed no significant differences between the 3,3-DBF-treated and control groups. The gastrointestinal transit assay indicated that 3,3-DBF did not induce constipation, in contrast to morphine. Furthermore, withdrawal signs assessed with the Gellert-Holtzman scale were not comparable to morphine. Additionally, 3,3-DBF exhibited antidepressant-like activity, reducing immobility time in the forced swimming and tail suspension tests, akin to imipramine. In summary, 3,3-DBF demonstrated antinociceptive effects without inducing tolerance or dependence and exhibited antidepressant properties. These findings highlight the potential of 3,3-DBF as a promising therapeutic agent for pain management and its comorbidities, offering advantages over morphine by minimizing side effects.

Opioid Mechanisms and the Treatment of Depression

Opioid receptors are widely expressed in the brain, and the opioid system has a key role in modulating mood, reward processing and stress responsivity. There is mounting evidence that the endogenous opioid system may be dysregulated in depression and that drug treatments targeting mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors may show antidepressant potential. The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of opioid system engagement are complex and likely multi-factorial. This chapter explores various pathways through which the modulation of the opioid system may influence depression. These include impacts on monoaminergic systems, the regulation of stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the immune system and inflammation, brain-derived neurotrophic factors, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, social pain and social reward, as well as expectancy and placebo effects. A greater understanding of the diverse mechanisms through which opioid system modulation may improve depressive symptoms could ultimately aid in the development of safe and effective alternative treatments for individuals with difficult-to-treat depression.

[Pathogenetic basis of modern approaches to the therapy of sleep disorders in the clinic of depression]

Epidemiological studies indicate that about 35% of the world's population periodically suffer from insomnia. Many authors in their studies note sleep disturbances in the clinic of both somatic and mental disorders, often considering sleep disturbances as one of the predictors of these diseases. In psychiatric practice, sleep disorders are most often described in the clinic of depression, which is determined by the general pathophysiological mechanisms of their development due to disruption of the activity of the main neurotransmitter systems of the brain. The results of clinical studies show that the drug of choice in the treatment of sleep disorders in the depression clinic is the antidepressant Mirtazapine, which has a unique profile of pharmacological activity. According to international recommendations, Mirtazapine is a first-line drug in the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders with sleep disorders and sexual dysfunction caused by taking other antidepressants.

GV16 acupoint stimulation with bee venom reduces peripheral hypersensitivity via activation of α2 adrenoceptors in a nitroglycerin-induced migraine mouse model

Background

Peripheral hypersensitivities develop in the face and hindpaws of mice with nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced migraine. We evaluated whether diluted bee venom (DBV) injections at acupoints prevented these peripheral hypersensitivities and c-Fos expression in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC).

Methods

NTG (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal, i.p.) was administered every other day for nine days. DBV (0.1 mg/kg) was subcutaneously injected into the ST36 (Zusanli), LI4 (Hegu), or GV16 (Fengfu) acupoints 75 min after each NTG injection. Mice were pretreated with naloxone (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or yohimbine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before the DBV injections.

Results

NTG injection caused facial cold allodynia, hindpaw mechanical allodynia, and increased c-Fos-immunoreactive (ir) cells in the TNC. Repetitive DBV injections at GV16, but not the ST36, or LI4 acupoints, suppressed NTG-induced hindpaw mechanical allodynia and facial cold allodynia. The number of c-Fos-ir cells also decreased in response to DBV injections at the GV16 acupoint. Remarkably, pretreatment with yohimbine reversed the anti-allodynic effects of DBV injections and attenuated the decreased c-Fos expression in response to GV16 DBV treatment. Naloxone did not block the effects of GV16 DBV stimulation.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that repetitive DBV treatment at the GV16 acupoint relieves NTG-induced facial and hindpaw hypersensitivities and decreases in c-Fos expression in the TNC via activation of the alpha-2 adrenoceptors, but not the opioid receptors.

Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD): Is the Opioid System Involved?

About 30% of major depression disorder patients fail to achieve remission, hence being diagnosed with treatment-resistant major depression (TRD). Opium had been largely used effectively to treat depression for centuries, but when other medications were introduced, its use was discounted due to addiction and other hazards. In a series of previous studies, we evaluated the antinociceptive effects of eight antidepressant medications and their interaction with the opioid system. Mice were tested with a hotplate or tail-flick after being injected with different doses of mianserin, mirtazapine, trazodone, venlafaxine, reboxetine, moclobemide, fluoxetine, or fluvoxamine to determine the effect of each drug in eliciting antinociception. When naloxone inhibited the antinociceptive effect, we further examined the effect of the specific opioid antagonists of each antidepressant drug. Mianserin and mirtazapine (separately) induced dose-dependent antinociception, each one yielding a biphasic dose-response curve, and they were antagonized by naloxone. Trazodone and venlafaxine (separately) induced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, antagonized by naloxone. Reboxetine induced a weak antinociceptive effect with no significant opioid involvement, while moclobemide, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine had no opioid-involved antinociceptive effects. Controlled clinical studies are needed to establish the efficacy of the augmentation of opiate antidepressants in persons with treatment-resistant depression and the optimal dosage of drugs prescribed.

Investigating the potential of mirtazapine to induce drug-seeking behavior in free-choice drinking mouse model

Addiction to various drugs and chemicals is a significant public health concern worldwide. Addiction to prescription medications has increased due to the psychoactive effects of these medications, their availability, low price, and the lack of legal consequences for abusers. One of such prescription medication is mirtazapine (MIRT). MIRT is an antidepressant that has recently been reported to be abused and could induce withdrawal symptoms in different case studies. No previous study has investigated its abuse potential in animal models of drug addiction. Here, we conducted a free-choice drinking paradigm to investigate voluntary drinking of MIRT at two different concentrations. Male BALB/c mice were given unlimited access to two water bottles for five days before being divided into three groups: the first group had free access to two water bottles. The second group (MIRT10) and the third group (MIRT20) was allowed unlimited choice to one bottle of water and one bottle of MIRT at concentrations of 0.03 and 0.06 mg/mL, respectively. The average daily MIRT intake in the MIRT20 group was significantly higher on all tested days than that in the MIRT10 group. Moreover, mice in the MIRT20 group preferred to self-administer MIRT over water, indicating that MIRT can induce drug-seeking behavior. To further investigate the addictive potential of MIRT and its possible deterioration of memory and recognition, as reported with several known drugs of abuse, animals underwent a novel object recognition test. Mice in the MIRT20 group demonstrated significant deterioration in memory and recognition, indicating its effects on different brain regions involved in recognition, similar to other known drugs of abuse. The forced swimming test and tail suspension test were used to test MIRT-induced withdrawal symptoms after forced abstinence. After eight days of abstinence, mice in the MIRT20 group demonstrated significant depression-like symptoms in both the TST and FST, manifested by a significant increase in immobility time. MIRT was shown to induce drug-seeking behavior, deteriorate recognition, and cause withdrawal symptoms. This might confirm that MIRT has the potential to induce drug dependence and further studies are warranted to explore the neurobiological basis of MIRT-induced drug-seeking behavior.

A Randomized Controlled Trial for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Aprepitant/Dexamethasone vs. Mirtazapine/Dexamethasone

Background

Coadministration of different antiemetics proved to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This trial compared aprepitant/dexamethasone (A/D) combination vs mirtazapine/dexamethasone (M/D) combination vs dexamethasone (D) alone for prevention of PONV in morbidly obese patients undergoing LSG.

Methods

Ninety patients scheduled for LSG were randomly allocated to receive 8 mg dexamethasone intravenous infusion (IVI) only in the D group or in addition to 80 mg aprepitant capsule in the A/D group or in addition to 30 mg mirtazapine tablet in the M/D group. Assessment of PONV was carried out at 0-2 h (early) and 2-24 h (late). The primary outcome was the complete response 0-24 h after surgery. Collective PONV, postoperative pain, side effects and patient satisfaction score were considered as secondary outcomes.

Results

The A/D and M/D groups were superior to the D group for a complete response within 0-24 h after surgery (79.3% for the A/D group, 78.6% for the M/D group, and 20.7% for the D group). The D group was inferior to the A/D and M/D groups regarding collective PONV and use of rescue antiemetic 0-24 h after surgery (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). The peak nausea scores (2-24 h) were significantly reduced in the M/D group in comparison to the D group (P=0.005). Patients in the M/D group showed high sedation scores, while those in the A/D group showed low pain scores (2-24 h) and less analgesic requirements (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). The A/D and M/D groups were superior to the D group with regard to the patient satisfaction score (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Aprepitant/dexamethasone combination and mirtazapine/dexamethasone combination were superior to dexamethasone alone in alleviating postoperative nausea and vomiting in morbidly obese patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04013386.

A Randomized Controlled Trial for Prevention of Postspinal Anesthesia Shivering in Gynecological Surgeries: Mirtazapine vs. Dexamethasone

Background

The frequency of shivering regarding regional anesthesia is 55%. Newer effective and tolerable options for postspinal anesthesia shivering (PSAS) prophylaxis are necessary to improve patients' quality of care. This research assessed the impact of preemptive mirtazapine versus preemptive dexamethasone to decrease frequency and severity of PSAS in gynecological procedures.

Methods

300 patients booked for gynecological procedures under spinal anesthesia (SA) were randomly apportioned into three groups (100 each) to get one preemptive dose of 30 mg mirtazapine tablet (M group), 8 mg dexamethasone diluted in 100 ml of saline infusion (D group) or placebo (C group) two hours before surgery. Incidence of clinically significant PSAS was the primary outcome. Core temperature, shivering score, hemodynamics changes, adverse events, and patient satisfaction score were documented as secondary outcomes.

Results

Compared with C group, mirtazapine and dexamethasone decreased incidence of clinically significant shivering (74% vs. 16% and 31%, respectively; P < 0.001). M and D groups had less hypotensive episodes during 5–25 min after intrathecal injection (P < 0.001). 90 min after SA, tympanic temperatures were lower than baseline values in the three groups (P < 0.001). Pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were more often in C group (P < 0.001), whereas sedation was more frequent in M group (P < 0.001). C group had the lowest satisfaction scores (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Prophylactic administration of mirtazapine or dexamethasone attenuated shivering with minimal hazards in patients scheduled for gynecological surgeries under spinal anesthesia with priority to mirtazapine. The trial is registered with NCT03675555.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess efficacy of mirtazapine for the treatment of diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Background

Ample evidence indicates the efficacy of serotonin type 3 (5-HT₃) receptor antagonists in the treatment of patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). Mirtazapine is an atypical antidepressant with a well-known 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist property. This study, therefore, was undertaken to investigate whether compared to placebo, mirtazapine would be efficacious and safe in the treatment of patients with IBS-D.

Methods

From November 2019 until July 2020, 67 patients meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS-D were randomized in a double-blind fashion into either the mirtazapine treatment group (n = 34) or the placebo treatment group (n = 33). Patients started with mirtazapine 15 mg/day at bedtime for one-week; after which the dose was increased to 30 mg/day for an additional 7-week. Outcomes included changes in the total IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS), Hospital anxiety and depression scale score (HADS), and IBS Quality of Life. Additionally, changes in the diary-based symptoms scores including pain, urgency of defecation, bloating, stool frequency, and stool consistency based on the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), and a number of days per week with pain, urgency, diarrhea, or bloating, once during the 1-week run-in period, and once during the last week of treatment were recorded.

Results

All analyses were performed on an Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis data set. The results showed compared to placebo, mirtazapine is more efficacious in decreasing the severity of IBS symptoms (P-value = 0.002). Further, at the end of the treatment period, all diary-derived symptoms except bloating showed significantly more improvement in the mirtazapine-treated subjects compared to the placebo-treated subjects. While was well-tolerated, mirtazapine also significantly improved the patients’ quality of life (P-value = 0.04) and anxiety symptoms (P-value = 0.005).

Conclusions

Overall, mirtazapine seems to have a potential benefit in the treatment of patients with IBS-D, particularly those with concomitant psychological symptoms. However, further studies are warranted to determine whether these findings are replicated.

Trial registration

Trial registration: Registration number at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20120215009014N311. Registration date: 2019-10-21.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Mirtazapine on Pruritus and Serum Histamine and Serotonin Levels in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Before-After Pilot Clinical Trial

Background

Although chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) remains a frequent and frustrating symptom in patients with advanced kidney diseases, its optimal treatments are not well defined. Based on its mechanism of action, as a histamine-1 (H1), 5-(hydroxytryptamine) HT2, and 5HT3-receptor blocker, mirtazapine may be effective in the treatment of CKD-aP. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy of mirtazapine for the treatment of pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD).

Methods

A before-after clinical trial was conducted from September 2018 until March 2019, on 30 HD-patients that had been referred to the HD ward of a tertiary hospital, in Hamadan, Iran. After the 2-week washout period, mirtazapine was administered with a dosage of 15 mg/day for an additional 2 weeks. At baseline and at each dialysis session, the effects of the mirtazapine on the pruritus severity based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and degree of sleep interference resulting from the pruritus were asked and recorded. Additionally, at the baseline and the end of 2 weeks of treatment, the serum histamine and serotonin levels, as the main chemical pruritogens evoking pruritus symptoms, were also determined.

Results

Twenty-seven patients completed the entire course of the study. Based on the general linear model analysis, a progressive decline in the mean VAS score was observed over time during the study. The mean VAS score decreased from 8.48 ± 1.01 at baseline to 1.04 ±0.79 at the end of treatment (P-value<0.001). Similarly, the mean sleep interference scores were also significantly improved throughout treatment (decreased from 8.07±1.43 to 2.81± 0.74; P-value<0.001). Further, at the end of the treatment, a noticeable decrement in the serum histamine level was also seen (P-value = 0.006). The drug was acceptably well-tolerated and a majority of the patients were satisfied with this treatment.

Conclusion

This pilot study suggests that mirtazapine may be an effective treatment option for the management of CKD-aP. However, further studies would be needed to confirm these results.

Effect of mirtazapine on pruritus in patients on hemodialysis: a cross-over pilot study

BACKGROUND

Uremic pruritus (UP) is a highly prevalent and disturbing problem in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, treatment of UP is largely unsatisfactory. The present study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of mirtazapine, an atypical antidepressant agent with potent antagonistic activity against serotonin (5HT2, 5HT3) and histamine (H1) receptors, in the treatment of pruritus in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

An 8-week long, prospective, open-label, and cross-over randomized clinical trial study was conducted on 77 HD patients with chronic pruritus. After a 2-week washout period, eligible patients were randomly assigned either to the mirtazapine (15 mg per day) or gabapentin (100 per day) for 2 weeks. Following 2 weeks washout period, subjects crossed over to the other treatment arm for 2 more weeks. The severity of pruritus was measured seven times during each treatment period using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Furthermore, at the end of the study, patients also were blindly asked which treatment (first or last in the sequential course of the study) they preferred.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients completed two treatment periods of the study. Although, compared to baseline, both gabapentin and mirtazapine treatment resulting in significant improvement in VAS scores, decreasing in pruritus severity was significantly greater in the mirtazapine treatment period compared with the gabapentin treatment period (P < 0.001). Furthermore, although side effects such as drowsiness and dry mouth more reported in the mirtazapine treatment period, overall higher percentage of the study patients preferred mirtazapine over gabapentin for the treatment of their pruritus symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preliminary, our study provides evidence that mirtazapine can be an effective therapy for UP in patients who are on maintenance HD. However, further studies would be necessary to confirm effectiveness as well as the safety of mirtazapine in the long-term management of chronic pruritus.

Trazodone and mirtazapine: A possible opioid involvement in their use (at low dose) for sleep?

The efficacy of each antidepressant available has been found equal to that of amitriptyline in double-blind studies. However, a few of them are being prescribed (at under-therapeutic doses) for sleep, in non-depressed persons, when there are relative contraindications for sedative-hypnotics. Following previous studies regarding the antinociceptive mechanisms of various antidepressants, we suggest that the involvement of the opioid system in some of the antidepressants' mechanism of action may contribute to these medications' use for the induction and maintenance of sleep. The mostly prescribed antidepressants for sleep are trazodone (a weak, but specific inhibitor of the synaptosomal uptake of serotonin, that also binds to alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoreceptor sites) and mirtazapine (a postsynaptic drug which enhances noradrenergic and 5-HT1A-mediated serotonergic neurotransmission via antagonism of central alpha-2-auto- and hetero-adrenoreceptors). In our previous studies when ICR mice were tested with a hotplate analgesia meter, both trazodone and mirtazapine induced, a naloxone-reversible antinociceptive effect following i.p administration. Summing up the various interactions of trazodone and mirtazapine with opioid, noradrenergic and serotonergic agonists and antagonists, we found that the antinociceptive effect of trazodone is influenced by the opioid receptor subtypes mu and delta (and a clear 5-HT mechanism of antinociception), while the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine is mainly influenced by kappa and mu opioid receptor subtype (combined with both serotonergic and noradrenergic receptors). This opioid profile of the two drugs may be one of the explanations to their efficacy in the treatment of insomnia, when sedatives (either benzodiazepines or the non-benzodiazepine "Z-compounds") cannot be prescribed.

Defining the role of mirtazapine in the treatment of refractory pruritus

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Mirtazapine has traditionally been used for the treatment of major depressive disorder, with an added benefit in patients who have comorbid insomnia or anxiety. Recent studies describe its usefulness in treating refractory pruritus of various causes as well. Our goal is to better define the use of mirtazapine in the treatment of refractory pruritus.

METHOD

Through a thorough literature review of PubMed, we identified all reports of the use of mirtazapine for pruritus.

RESULTS

Upon examination of 8 supporting articles, we found mirtazapine has quality evidence for the treatment of intra-thecal morphine-induced pruritus. Mirtazapine may also be effective in treating pruritus related to various other conditions, including psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, cutaneous malignancies (primary or metastatic), hematologic malignancies (lymphomas and leukemias), liver failure, renal failure, cholestasis, as well as pruritus of unknown origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine plays a role in treatment for intra-thecel morphine-induced pruritis yet high-quality trials are needed to confirm its efficacy in other dermatologic conditions.

The effect of mirtazapine on gastric accommodation, gastric sensitivity to distention, and nutrient tolerance in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Disturbances of gastric motor function of functional dyspepsia (FD) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the symptoms, and hence, motility modifying agents are considered for its treatment. Mirtazapine was recently shown to improve symptoms and increase nutrient tolerance in FD patients with weight loss. We aim to evaluate the effect of mirtazapine on gastric sensorimotor function in healthy volunteers (HV).

METHODS

Thirty-one HV underwent an intragastric pressure (IGP) and barostat measurements on separate days before and after 3 weeks of placebo or mirtazapine (15 mg). Gastric compliance, sensitivity and accommodation (GA) measured by the barostat. GA was quantitated as the difference (delta) in intra-balloon volume before and after ingestion of 200 mL of a nutrient drink (ND). GA measured by IGP was quantitated as the drop of IGP from baseline during the intragastric infusion of ND until maximal satiation.

KEY RESULTS

Mirtazapine significantly increased the bodyweight of subjects (67.8±3.7 to 69.1±3.7 kg; P=.01). Barostat results showed no effect on gastric compliance, sensitivity, and GA. Nutrient tolerance was not affected after treatment (1170±129.4 vs 1104±133.6 kcal; P=.4), and mirtazapine was associated with lower symptom ratings. The IGP drop during meal ingestion was significantly suppressed (area under the curve: -43.3±4.5 mm Hg vs -28.9±3.1 mm Hg; P=.005).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In HVs, the occurrence of weight gain and decreased meal-induced symptoms in spite of a suppressed meal-induced IGP drop, point towards a central mode of action. Mirtazapine does not display changes in gastric sensorimotor function that could explain its beneficial effects on symptoms and nutrient tolerance in FD.

Opioid Receptors Contribute to Antinociceptive Effect of Tianeptine on Colorectal Distension-Induced Visceral Pain in Rats

Tianeptine is a clinically effective atypical antidepressant with distinct neurochemical properties. In this study, we aimed to investigate the contribution of opioid receptors in the antinociceptive effect of tianeptine on visceral pain in awake rats and to differentiate the subtype and the localization (central and/or peripheral) of these opioid receptors involved in this antinociception. Visceromotor response to noxious colorectal distension (CRD) was quantified with electromyographic recordings, obtained from previously implanted electrodes into the external oblique musculature of rats under anesthesia, before and after tianeptine administration. The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone hydrochloride (NLX) and peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM) were administered intravenously 10 min before tianeptine (10 mg/kg, i.v.). The antinociceptive effect of tianeptine was abolished by NLX (1 and 2 mg/kg, i.v.), but was partially reduced by NLXM (1 and 2 mg/kg, i.v.). A µ-opioid receptor-selective dose (0.03 mg/kg, i.v.) of NLX, but not NLXM, significantly inhibited the antinociceptive effect of tianeptine. Our results suggest that antinociceptive effect of tianeptine on CRD-induced visceral nociception in rats involves the activation of both central and peripheral opioid receptors.

Further analysis of acute antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory actions of 4-phenylselenyl-7-chloroquinoline in mice

A new quinoline containing selenium, 4-phenylselenyl-7-chloroquinoline (4-PSQ), was described and synthetized by our research group. Recently, we demonstrated the potential antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory of 4-PSQ. For this reason, the first objective of this study was to expand our previous findings by investigating the contribution of glutamatergic, serotonergic, and nitrergic systems to the acute antinociceptive action of this compound. Pretreatment with 4-PSQ (0.01-25 mg/kg, p.o.) reduced the nociception induced by glutamate. MK-801 (an uncompetitive antagonist of the N-Methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor) blocked the antinociceptive effect exerted by 4-PSQ (25 mg/kg, p.o.) in the acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing test. The pretreatment with WAY100635 (a selective antagonist of 5-HT_1A receptor), ketanserin (a selective antagonist of 5-HT_2A/2C receptor), and pindolol (a nonselective antagonist of 5-HT_1A/1B receptors) partially blocked the antinociceptive effect caused by 4-PSQ (25 mg/kg, per oral, p.o.) in the acetic acid-induced abdominal writhing test. Nitric oxide precursor, l-arginine hydrochloride, partially reversed antinociception caused by 4-PSQ or ω-nitro-l-arginine (l-NOARG). Treatments did not modify the locomotor and exploratory activities of mice. Additionally, the acute anti-inflammatory effect of 4-PSQ in a model of pleurisy induced by carrageenan in mice was investigated. 4-PSQ reduced the cellular migration, pleural exudate accumulation, and myeloperoxidase activity induced by carrageenan exposure. 4-PSQ protected against the increase in reactive species levels and reduction of nonprotein thiol levels induced by carrageenan. Data presented here showed that the modulation of serotonergic, nitrergic, and glutamatergic systems contributed to the antinociceptive effect of 4-PSQ and it reinforced the therapeutic potential of this quinolinic compound for acute inflammation.

Efficacy of mirtazapine for the treatment of fibromyalgia without concomitant depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study in Japan

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Twelve-week treatment with mirtazapine (30 mg/d) was effective and safe in controlling fibromyalgia pain in Japanese nonelderly adult patients without coexisting depression.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in Japanese patients with fibromyalgia (FM), a parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa study was conducted at 57 sites between November 2012 and February 2014. Patients aged 20 to 64 years who met the American College of Rheumatology 1990 diagnostic FM criteria and had stably high pain scores during a placebo run-in period were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated allocation sequence (block size 4) to receive mirtazapine orally (15 mg/d for 1 week and then 30 mg/d) or matching placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score from baseline to endpoint (week 12 or early discontinuation). Of the 430 patients randomized (n = 215 each group), 422 (n = 211 each group) were analyzed for the primary endpoint. At the study endpoint, mirtazapine caused a significantly greater reduction in the mean NRS pain score compared with placebo (difference, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, −0.72 to −0.17; P = 0.0018). The reduction by mirtazapine remained significantly greater compared with placebo from week 6 onward. More patients treated with mirtazapine had their NRS pain score reduced by ≥30% from baseline (45.5% vs 30.8%). Mirtazapine also improved pain-related quality of life assessed by the Japanese version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire and the Short-Form 36 Questionnaire. Adverse events were more common with mirtazapine than placebo (68.8% vs 56.7%), including somnolence (32.1% vs 7.4%), weight gain (17.7% vs 0.9%), and increased appetite (11.6% vs 3.3%). In conclusion, mirtazapine was an effective and safe treatment for Japanese patients with FM.

Antinociceptive Effect of Mirtazapine in Rats with Diabetic Neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine and the mechanisms mediating this effect in neuropathic pain in rats with diabetes.

METHODS

The experiments were performed in Sprague Dawley rats using a hot-plate device. Streptozotocin (STZ) was administered to the rats after taking control measurements. Rats with a blood glucose level of 240 mg/dL or above in the blood specimen obtained from the tail vein 3 days after STZ administration were considered as being diabetic. Three weeks after STZ administration, the hot-plate test was performed. Compared with the control measurements, rats that exhibited >20% decrease in the second hot-plate test measurements were considered to have developed neuropathy. Drugs [mirtazapine, naloxone (opioidergic antagonist), metergoline (serotonergic antagonist), and BRL44408 (adrenergic antagonist)] and drug combinations were administered to those rats that developed neuropathy. After administrating the drugs or drug combinations, the third hot-plate test was performed.

RESULTS

Mirtazapine at doses of 10 and 15 mg/kg exhibited a significant antinociceptive effect. Naloxone, metergoline, or BRL44408 alone did not cause an antinociceptive effect. However, combinations of these drugs with mirtazapine (15 mg/kg) significantly decreased the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

It is suggested that mirtazapine has a significant antinociceptive effect in diabetic neuropathy and that opioidergic, serotonergic, and adrenergic systems have roles to play in this effect.

Repetitive Acupuncture Point Treatment with Diluted Bee Venom Relieves Mechanical Allodynia and Restores Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Loss in Oxaliplatin-Induced Neuropathic Mice

The chemotherapeutic agent, oxaliplatin, produces a robust painful neuropathy that results in the loss of intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENFs). We have previously reported that an acupuncture point (acupoint) injection of diluted bee venom (DBV) produces a temporary antiallodynic effect in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic mice. Herein we show a significant long-lasting antinociceptive effect of repetitive DBV acupoint treatment on oxaliplatin-induced mechanical allodynia and a significant reduction in the loss of IENFs. DBV (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneous) was administered once a day for 18 days beginning on day 15 after oxaliplatin injection. Immunohistochemistry for IENF was performed on the glabrous skin of the hind paw footpad using the pan-neuronal marker, protein gene product 9.5. A temporary increase in mechanical threshold was observed 60 minutes after a single DBV injection into the Zusanli acupoint, and this effect was enhanced over time with repetitive DBV treatments. The basal mechanical threshold before daily DBV injection also increased from day 7 after DBV injections, and peaked at day 14 after DBV treatment. Moreover, the oxaliplatin-induced loss of IENFs was significantly reduced in mice treated repetitively with DBV. Repetitive pretreatment with the α-2 adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, (5 mg/kg, subcutaneous) completely prevented the antiallodynic effects and the increase in IENFs observed in mice treated repetitively with DBV.

PERSPECTIVE

We showed that repetitive acupoint stimulation with DBV gradually and significantly reduced oxaliplatin-induced mechanical allodynia and restored the loss of IENFs in neuropathic mice via an α-2 adrenoceptor mechanism. Collectively, results of this study suggest that repetitive acupoint treatment with DBV can be a potential strategy for the management of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.

Neuraxial opioid-induced pruritus: An update

Pruritus is a troublesome side-effect of neuraxial (epidural and intrathecal) opioids. Sometimes it may be more unpleasant than pain itself. The prevention and treatment still remains a challenge. A variety of medications with different mechanisms of action have been used for the prevention and treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, with mixed results. The aim of this article is to review the current body of literature and summarize the current understanding of the mechanisms and the pharmacological therapies available to manage opioid-induced pruritus. The literature source of this review was obtained via PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews until 2012. The search results were limited to the randomized controlled trials, systemic reviews and non-systemic reviews.

Repeated administration of mirtazapine attenuates oxaliplatin-induced mechanical allodynia and spinal NR2B up-regulation in rats

Chemotherapic drugs may elicit acute or chronic peripheral neuropathies. Mirtazapine, as an antidepressant, is also used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The current study aimed to investigate the effect of mirtazapine on the oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in rats as well as the underlying mechanism. A neuropathy model was established in Sprague-Dawley rats by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of oxaliplatin 4 mg/kg twice a week for 4 weeks. The therapeutic potential of mirtazapine 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg/day per-orally for 28 consecutive days was evaluated. Subsequently, a dose of 1 mg/kg of WAY100635 i.p., a selective antagonist of 5-HT1A receptor, was preadministrated before mirtazapine 20 mg/kg/day per-orally in oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. The behavioral tests and the expression of NMDA receptor subunit NR2B were determined. The results displayed that repeated administration of mirtazapine 20 or 30 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days significantly attenuated the mechanical allodynia and the up-regulation of spinal cord NR2B but not the cold hyperalgesia in rats with oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, which was reversed by WAY100635 preadministration. Our findings suggest that oxaliplatin-induced mechanical allodynia is associated with spinal NR2B up-regulation, which may be attenuated by mirtazapine administration.

Mirtazapine provokes periodic leg movements during sleep in young healthy men

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent evidence suggests that certain antidepressants are associated with an increase of periodic leg movements (PLMS) that may disturb sleep. So far, this has been shown in patients clinically treated for depression and in cross-sectional studies for various substances, but not mirtazapine. It is unclear whether antidepressants induce the new onset of PLMS or only increase preexisting PLMS, and whether this is a general property of the antidepressant or only seen in depressed patients. We report here the effect of mirtazapine on PLMS in young healthy men.

DESIGN

Open-labeled clinical trial (NCT00878540) including a 3-week preparatory phase with standardized food, physical activity, and sleep-wake behavior, and a 10-day experimental inpatient phase with an adaptation day, 2 baseline days, and 7 days with mirtazapine.

SETTING

Research institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve healthy young (20-25 years) men.

INTERVENTIONS

Seven days of nightly intake (22:00) of 30 mg mirtazapine.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Sleep was recorded on 2 drug-free baseline nights, the first 2 drug nights, and the last 2 drug nights. Eight of the 12 subjects showed increased PLMS after the first dose of mirtazapine. Frequency of PLMS was highest on the first drug night and attenuated over the course of the next 6 days. Three subjects reported transient restless legs symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine provoked PLMS in 67% of young healthy males. The effect was most pronounced in the first days. The possible role of serotonergic, noradrenergic and histaminergic mechanisms in mirtazapine-induced PLMS is discussed.

The atypical antidepressant mianserin exhibits agonist activity at κ-opioid receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antidepressants are known to interact with the opioid system through mechanisms not completely understood. We previously reported that tricyclic antidepressants act as agonists at distinct opioid receptors. Here, we investigated the effect of the atypical antidepressant mianserin at cloned and native opioid receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Effects of mianserin were examined in CHO cells transfected with human opioid receptors, C6 glioma cells and rat brain membranes by the use of radioligand binding and functional assays including the stimulation of [(35)S]GTPγS binding and MAPK phosphorylation.

KEY RESULTS

Mianserin displayed 12- and 18-fold higher affinity for κ- than µ- and δ-opioid receptors respectively. In [(35)S]GTPγS assays, mianserin selectively activated κ-opioid receptors. The agonist activity was antagonized by the selective κ-opioid blocker nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI). The mianserin analogue mirtazapine also displayed κ-opioid agonist activity. Mianserin and mirtazapine increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing κ-opioid receptors and C6 cells, and these effects were antagonized by nor-BNI. In rat striatum and nucleus accumbens, mianserin stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding in a nor-BNI-sensitive manner with maximal effects lower than those of the full κ-opioid agonists (-)-U50,488 and dynorphin A. When combined, mianserin antagonized the effects of the full κ-opioid receptor agonists in [(35)S]GTPγS assays and reduced the stimulation of p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 phosphorylation by dynorphin A.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

In different cell systems, mianserin directly activates κ-opioid receptors, displaying partial agonist activity at brain receptors. Thus, this property appears to be a common feature of different classes of antidepressants.

The atypical antidepressant mirtazapine attenuates expression of morphine-induced place preference and motor sensitization

Opioid abuse and dependence remains prevalent despite having multiple FDA-approved medications to help maintain abstinence. Mirtazapine is an atypical antidepressant receiving attention for substance abuse pharmacotherapy, and its action includes alterations in monoaminergic transmission. As monoamines are indirectly altered by opioids, the current investigation assessed the ability of mirtazapine to ameliorate morphine-induced behaviors. Conditioned place preference (CPP) is a behavioral assay wherein a rewarding drug is paired with a distinct environmental context resulting in reward-related salience of cues through learning-related neuronal plasticity. A second behavioral assay involved motor sensitization (MSn), wherein repeated administration results in an enhanced motoric response to an acute challenge, also reflecting neuronal plasticity. Attenuation of CPP and/or MSn provides two behavioral measures to suggest therapeutic potential for addiction therapy, and the present study evaluated the effectiveness of mirtazapine to reduce both behaviors. To do so, morphine-induced CPP was established using an eight day conditioning paradigm, and expression of CPP was tested on day 10 following a 24h or 30min mirtazapine pretreatment. To determine if mirtazapine altered the expression of MSn, on day 11, rats received a pretreatment of mirtazapine, followed 30min later by a challenge injection of morphine. Pretreatment with mirtazapine 24h prior to the CPP test had no effect on CPP expression. In contrast, a 30min pretreatment of mirtazapine attenuated the expression of both CPP and MSn. Collectively, these results indicate that mirtazapine may help to maintain abstinence in opioid dependent patients.

Racemic intrathecal mirtazapine but not its enantiomers acts anti-neuropathic after chronic constriction injury in rats

The unique noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant mirtazapine acts antinociceptive. It is optically active and currently marketed as racemate. In an animal model of acute pain it has been shown that the enantiomers exhibit differential effects: the R(-)-enantiomer showed anti-, the S(+)-enantiomer pronociceptive properties while the racemate acted antinociceptive at low doses and profoundly pronociceptive after high-dose application. Aim of the present study was to evaluate potential enantioselective effects of mirtazapine in neuropathic pain. In a chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain, Wistar rats were injected (+/-)-mirtazapine and the enantiomers intrathecally. All substances were dosed between 0.001 and 1mg/kg and compared to vehicle in a randomized and blinded approach. Thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia were assessed. In contrast to the acute pain results, only racemic mirtazapine exerted significant sustained analgesic effects up to 48 h. Antinociception was observed at all dosages with a maximum in the range of 0.01 mg/kg. Surprisingly, neither enantiomer was pro- nor antinociceptive at any dose or time. Our findings suggest that the synergism of both enantiomers is required to evoke a significant analgesic effect for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Our study gained no evidence for the use of either R(-) nor S(+)-mirtazapine alone. Due to the unique characteristics of (+/-)-mirtazapine and its proven efficacy in acute pain our results suggest that racemic mirtazapine may be a particularly useful antidepressant in the adjunctive treatment of chronic neuropathic pain states and could provide additional benefit to current therapeutic options.

Pain and u-shaped dose responses: occurrence, mechanisms, and clinical implications

This article assesses pain within the context of the dose response. A substantial number of studies indicate that the dose response for pain-related endpoints is commonly biphasic, being independent of the type of biological model employed, endpoint measured, or agent tested. The quantitative features of the dose response are also remarkably consistent regardless of the receptor pathway that mediates the nociceptive response, indicating a likely downstream message convergence. These findings have important implications for drug discovery, development, and clinical evaluation.

Prophylactic mirtazapine reduces intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus

BACKGROUND

Activation of the serotonergic system is an important factor in the pathogenesis of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus. Mirtazapine is a new antidepressant that selectively blocks 5-HT(2) and 5-HT(3) receptors. We therefore tested the hypothesis that preoperative mirtazapine would reduce the incidence of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.

METHODS

One hundred and ten ASA I patients undergoing lower limb surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated into two equal groups and received either mirtazapine 30 mg or an orally disintegrating placebo tablet 1 h before operation in a prospective, double-blinded trial. All patients received an intrathecal injection of 15 mg of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.2 mg preservative-free morphine. The occurrence and the severity of pruritus were assessed at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h after intrathecal morphine.

RESULTS

Pruritus was significantly more frequent in the placebo group compared with the mirtazapine group (75% vs 52%, respectively; P=0.0245). The time to onset of pruritus in the two groups was also significantly different. The patients who experienced pruritus in the placebo group had a faster onset time than that in the mirtazapine group [mean (sd): 3.2 (0.8) vs 7.2 (4.1) h, P<0.0001].

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine premedication prevents pruritus induced by intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing lower limb surgery with spinal anaesthesia.

Tricyclic antidepressants abuse, with or without benzodiazepines abuse, in former heroin addicts currently in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT)

BACKGROUND

To measure suspected abuse of the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline among methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) patients in Israel, we studied cross-sectionally, all our 303 patients (February, 2007).

METHODS

Tricyclics presence was screened in one of the random urine samples routinely taken for tests of other drugs. ASI questionnaire, variables from patients' records.

FINDINGS

48 (15.8%) patients were positive for amitriptyline. Logistic regression (multivariate analyses) found that the extent of being amitriptyline-positive was higher in benzodiazepine (BDZ) abusers (OR=11.6 95% CI 4.4-30.7), in subjects with positive antibody to hepatitis C (OR=2.2, 95% CI 1.02-4.9) and in patients treated with high-dose methadone (>150 mg/day) (OR=2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9). Amitriptyline was found in 12 (7.5%) of the "privileged" group of patients (stabilized patients who, based on their long-standing cessation of any type of street-drugs abuse and prolonged normative behavior in treatment are granted "take home" methadone doses) who, by definition, should not be abusing anything.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of amitriptyline abuse found in our patients, and its potential cardiac hazards when combined with BDZ abuse, emphasizes the importance of amitriptyline routine monitoring in order to decrease the potential risk associated with amitriptyline combined with methadone and BDZ, and to implement appropriate interventions.

Combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen for prophylaxis of chronic tension-type headache

Chronic headaches are difficult to treat and represent the biggest challenge in headache centres. Mirtazapine has a prophylactic and ibuprofen an acute effect in tension-type headache. Combination therapy may increase efficacy and lower side effects. We aimed to evaluate the prophylactic effect of a combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen in chronic tension-type headache. Ninety-three patients were included in the double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial. Following a 4-week run-in period they were randomized to four groups for treatment with a combination of mirtazapine 4.5 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg, placebo, mirtazapine 4.5 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg daily for 8 weeks. Eighty-four patients completed the study. The primary efficacy parameter, change in area under the headache curve from run-in to the last 4 weeks of treatment, did not differ between combination therapy (190) and placebo (219), P = 0.85. Explanatory analyses revealed worsening of headache already in the third week of treatment with ibuprofen alone. In conclusion, the combination of low-dose mirtazapine and ibuprofen is not effective for the treatment of chronic tension-type headache. Moreover, the study suggests that daily intake of ibuprofen worsens headache already after few weeks in chronic tension-type headache.

Differentiating antidepressants of the future: Efficacy and safety

There have been significant advances in the treatment of depression since the serendipitous discovery that modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission may be a pathological underpinning of the disease. Despite these advances, particularly over the last 15years with the introduction of selective serotonin and/or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), there still remain multiple unmet clinical needs that would represent substantial improvements to current treatment regimens. In terms of efficacy there have been improvements in the percentage of patients achieving remission but this can still be dramatically improved and, in fact, issues still remain with relapse. Furthermore, advances are still required in terms of improving the onset of efficacy as well as addressing the large proportion of patients who remain treatment resistant. While this is not well understood, collective research in the area suggests the disease is heterogeneous in terms of the multiple parameters related to etiology, pathology and response to pharmacological agents. In addition to efficacy further therapeutic advances will also need to address such issues as cognitive impairment, pain, sexual dysfunction, nausea and emesis, weight gain and potential cardiovascular effects. With these unmet needs in mind, the next generation of antidepressants will need to differentiate themselves from the current array of therapeutics for depression. There are multiple strategies for addressing unmet needs that are currently being investigated. These range from combination monoaminergic approaches to subtype selective agents to novel targets that include mechanisms to modulate neuropeptides and excitatory amino acids (EAA). This review will discuss the many facets of differentiation and potential strategies for the development of novel antidepressants.

Does trazodone have a role in palliating symptoms?

INTRODUCTION

Trazodone is a unique antidepressant, which blocks the postsynaptic serotonin (5-HT) receptors, 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C), and weakly inhibits presynaptic 5-HT transporters.

DISCUSSION

Trazodone is well-absorbed by the mouth and is metabolized by three cytochromes: CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4. Clinical benefits include reduced insomnia in those depressed and/or on antidepressants. Pain may be relieved by mechanisms similar to venlafaxine. Delirium unresponsive to neuroleptics has been reported to respond to trazodone. Drug interactions are a risk due to cytochrome metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Trazodone has a unique pharmacology, which may be an advantage in palliating symptoms; however, little evidence is available through cohort or randomized trials to give guidance to its use.

Mirtazapine and its enantiomers differentially modulate acute thermal nociception in rats

The antidepressant mirtazapine is an optically active drug and currently marketed as a racemic compound consisting of its S(+) and R(-)-enantiomers in a 50:50 mixture. As stereochemistry of antidepressants has become increasingly important to consider for the relevance of their analgesic properties, we investigated the effect of (+/-)-mirtazapine and its enantiomers in an animal model of acute thermal nociception. Wistar rats were injected intrathecal with either (+/-)-mirtazapine, R(-)-mirtazapine, S(+)-mirtazapine from 1 to 0.001 mg/kg and vehicle (0.9% NaCl), respectively. The effects on thermal paw withdrawal thresholds were monitored using the Hargreaves test. (+/-)-Mirtazapine exerted pro- and antinociceptive effects in acute thermal nociception, whereas R(-)-mirtazapine showed solely antinociceptive and S(+)-mirtazapine pronociceptive properties. These results clearly demonstrate a differential effect of (+/-)-mirtazapine and its enantiomers on nociception. As R(-)-mirtazapine exerts the antinociceptive activity of the racemic mixture it may be a putative candidate for an enantioselective use as analgesic.

The effect of mirtazapine in patients with chronic pain and concomitant depression

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of mirtazapine in patients with the primary diagnosis of chronic pain and concomitant depression in an open post-marketing surveillance study.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

594 patients with a primary diagnosis of at least one chronic pain syndrome (minimum duration of 3 months) and the diagnosis of concomitant depression, appropriately made by a neurologist or psychiatrist, were recruited at psychiatric and/or neurological outpatient facilities throughout Germany. The primary efficacy parameter was pain at baseline and endpoint using a patient self-assessment scale. Secondary analyses were performed at baseline, week 1 (day 7 +/- 2), week 4 (day 28 +/- 4) and at endpoint (day 42 +/- 4 or early termination) and included safety and tolerability assessments. Investigators rated the severity of different potential co-morbidities (including depression) with a four-step rating scale (not present, mild, moderate, severe).

RESULTS

594 patients were enrolled and treated with mirtazapine (mean daily dose of 34.5 +/- 10.4 mg at study endpoint). A statistically significant (p < 0.0001; one sample sign test) reduction of pain from baseline to endpoint was found for the overall population. The percentage of patients free of pain or with only moderate pain increased significantly, irrespective of patients' age or pain syndromes. Furthermore, we found a substantial improvement from baseline to endpoint regarding co-morbidities such as sleep disturbance, irritability and exhaustion. The number of adverse events was low (<7%; n = 37), with fatigue (n = 13) and weight gain (n = 11) occurring most frequently. No previously-unknown side effects occurred. One hundred and six patients (18%) discontinued mirtazapine during the study. The main reason was lack of efficacy (6%, n = 33), which may be a reflection of sub-optimal response to the anti-depressant or analgesic effect of the drug, but no appropriate rating scale was used to clarify this question. Only a small number of patients stopped the drug due to adverse events (3%; n = 15). At study endpoint, the majority of physicians and patients rated the overall efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine as good or very good. Most patients (80%) continued the therapy after 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations of an open observational study, our findings suggest that mirtazapine is a safe and well-tolerated drug for use in daily clinical practice. It still remains unclear whether the reduction of pain, the enhancement of the depressed mood or the combination of both effects led to these results. Nevertheless, our data point to a potential beneficial effect of mirtazapine in the treatment of patients with pain and concomitant depression. However, more systematic research, including placebo-controlled studies, and further empirical testing are necessary.

Chronic pain: physiological, diagnostic, and management considerations

Neuropathic pain is a neuropsychiatric condition in which pain is initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system. Understanding the complexity of neuropathic pain becomes the cornerstone for appropriate diagnosis and management. Diagnosis must take into account comorbid conditions. Successful management depends on realistic patient and physician expectations and an individualized, multidisciplinary approach.

Antinociceptive effects of the antidepressants amitriptyline, duloxetine, mirtazapine and citalopram in animal models of acute, persistent and neuropathic pain

The effects of acute, systemic administration of amitriptyline, duloxetine and mirtazapine (antidepressant drugs that variously affect extracellular noradrenaline and serotonin levels) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram were compared in rat models of experimental pain. None of the drugs (all 3-30 mg/kg, i.p.) affected acute nociceptive responses as measured in the tail flick test. In the hot plate test, duloxetine and mirtazapine significantly increased (P<0.05) the nociceptive response latency, whereas amitriptyline and citalopram were ineffective. In the formalin test, duloxetine and citalopram significantly attenuated, whereas amitriptyline and mirtazapine increased, second phase flinching behaviour (all P<0.05). However, amitriptyline and mirtazapine reduced second phase licking behaviour. In the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain, thermal hyperalgesia of the injured hindpaw was significantly attenuated by all four drugs (P<0.05); only amitriptyline and duloxetine fully reversed thermal hypersensitivity. None of the drugs tested attenuated mechanical allodynia. In contrast amitriptyline, duloxetine and mirtazapine significantly reduced mechanical hyperalgesia (P<0.05); citalopram was ineffective. No drug-related effects on motor performance in the rotarod test were observed. These results (a) highlight the difficulty in correlating antinociceptive effects of drugs from different antidepressant classes across a range of animal pain models and (b) suggest that antidepressants that variously affect both noradrenaline and serotonin levels have more potent and efficacious antinociceptive effects than SSRIs (as exemplified by citalopram), against a range of pain-like behaviours in an animal model of neuropathic pain.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2002

This paper is the twenty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2002 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Mirtazapine in L-dopa-induced dyskinesias

Mirtazapine is a novel antidepressant with a pharmacologic profile (alpha-2 antagonist, 5HT-(1A) agonist, and 5HT-(2) antagonist) that renders it potentially useful for l-dopa-induced dyskinesias. Drugs with 5HT-(1A) agonistic activity, such as buspirone and tandospirone, have been reported to be effective in reducing l-dopa-induced dyskinesias. Furthermore, 5HT-(2) antagonism may, by reducing substantia nigra pars reticulata hyperactivity, play a role in the improvement of Parkinsonian symptoms and l-dopa-induced dyskinesias, as has been observed with ritanserin, a 5HT-(2) antagonist. Alpha-2 antagonists, such as idazoxan, have recently also been reported to improve l-dopa-induced dyskinesias. The authors investigated the antidyskinetic properties of mirtazapine by designing an open-label study of 20 Parkinsonian patients with l-dopa-induced dyskinesias. Mirtazapine proved to be moderately effective in reducing l-dopa-induced dyskinesias, either alone or in association with amantadine. Mirtazapine may be of use in patients who do not respond or are intolerant to amantadine.