A cautionary note: the actions of adenosine agonists and antagonists may be reversed under certain conditions in primary cultures

Neuroprotection by adenosine in the brain: From A(1) receptor activation to A (2A) receptor blockade

Adenosine is a neuromodulator that operates via the most abundant inhibitory adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs) and the less abundant, but widespread, facilitatory A(2A)Rs. It is commonly assumed that A(1)Rs play a key role in neuroprotection since they decrease glutamate release and hyperpolarize neurons. In fact, A(1)R activation at the onset of neuronal injury attenuates brain damage, whereas its blockade exacerbates damage in adult animals. However, there is a down-regulation of central A(1)Rs in chronic noxious situations. In contrast, A(2A)Rs are up-regulated in noxious brain conditions and their blockade confers robust brain neuroprotection in adult animals. The brain neuroprotective effect of A(2A)R antagonists is maintained in chronic noxious brain conditions without observable peripheral effects, thus justifying the interest of A(2A)R antagonists as novel protective agents in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease, ischemic brain damage and epilepsy. The greater interest of A(2A)R blockade compared to A(1)R activation does not mean that A(1)R activation is irrelevant for a neuroprotective strategy. In fact, it is proposed that coupling A(2A)R antagonists with strategies aimed at bursting the levels of extracellular adenosine (by inhibiting adenosine kinase) to activate A(1)Rs might constitute the more robust brain neuroprotective strategy based on the adenosine neuromodulatory system. This strategy should be useful in adult animals and especially in the elderly (where brain pathologies are prevalent) but is not valid for fetus or newborns where the impact of adenosine receptors on brain damage is different.

Generation of reactive oxygen species by xanthine derivatives in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells

Theophylline reduces cell number in MDA-MB-231 cells through mechanisms over and above phosphodiesterase inhibition. In the current study, we used an intracellular fluorescent dye to show that theophylline and, to a much greater extent, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, evoke the generation of reactive oxygen species and also sensitize the cells to insult by other oxidants. Xanthine derivatives may therefore offer novel strategies for antitumor therapeutics.

Antimitotic and cytotoxic effects of theophylline in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells

A variety of cancer cell lines, including MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells, exhibit mitotic inhibition by cAMP. In earlier work, we found that the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, theophylline, reduced the number of cells and altered cellular morphology. In the current study, we evaluated the effects of theophylline on macromolecule synthesis and indices of cell viability. Theophylline evoked a concentration- and time-dependent decrease in DNA synthesis. However, the net decrease in cell number was greater than that predicted solely from mitotic arrest. Assessment of protein synthesis indicated a second effect of theophylline separable from that on DNA synthesis. This was confirmed by decreased cell viability and adhesion. Exposure of the cells to the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, IBMX, in concentrations that produced inhibition of DNA synthesis equivalent to that seen with theophylline, elicited a smaller reduction in cell number. Theophylline also evoked specific changes in the expression or function of membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase activity, effects that are likely to contribute to sustained reactivity of these cells to other cAMP-related inhibitors of cell proliferation, such as isoproterenol. The multiple pharmacologic properties of theophylline, producing mitotic inhibition, cytotoxicity and altered signaling in MDA-MB-231 cells, may provide insight into novel therapeutic strategies.