Behavioral effects of flunitrazepam: reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects in rhesus monkeys and prevention of withdrawal signs in pentobarbital-dependent rats

Establishing performance characteristics for positive control article selection in drug self-administration studies

The selection of a controlled substance (CS) for use as the positive control article in a nonclinical drug abuse liability (DAL) assessment study should be contemplated carefully and with full understanding of the stated intent of the study design. Any CS that can maintain day-to-day stable baseline responding of voluntary intravenous intakes in animals may be selected under the current guidelines. Schedule I - IV CNS stimulants, depressants, and sedative/hypnotics can serve as maintenance drugs in these protocols, but not all of these compounds will provide comparatively efficient, robust, and stable daily intakes. Each Sponsor is directed to select a positive control article and training dose that will provide the most balanced, predictive, and scientifically-sound comparison consistent with the mechanism of action or therapeutic target of the test article. The SA study design is not a "one-size-fits-all" assay. This is a discussion of the critical design factors to be considered in selecting the most appropriate positive control article to use for a SA study.

Preference for an Opioid/Benzodiazepine Mixture over an Opioid Alone Using a Concurrent Choice Procedure in Rhesus Monkeys

Increased abuse of opioids is contributing to an escalation in overdose deaths. Benzodiazepines are frequently abused with opioids, possibly because they increase the potency and/or effectiveness of opioids to produce reinforcing effects. This study used a concurrent-choice procedure to determine whether monkeys would choose to self-administer a mixture of the opioid remifentanil and the benzodiazepine midazolam over remifentanil alone. Initially, three monkeys could respond on one lever for saline and on a second lever for either remifentanil alone or midazolam alone. Thereafter, monkeys chose between a dose of remifentanil (0.32 µg/kg/infusion) that did not change and a dose of remifentanil that varied across sessions; for some sessions, midazolam was combined with varying doses of remifentanil. All monkeys received more infusions of remifentanil (0.0032-0.32 µg/kg/infusion) than saline, whereas only two monkeys responded more for midazolam than for saline. When 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil was available on one lever and a dose of remifentanil that varied across sessions (0.1-1 µg/kg/infusion) was available on the other lever, monkeys chose the larger dose. Combining 3.2 µg/kg/infusion midazolam with 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil increased responding for the mixture over 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil alone, although monkeys chose remifentanil alone over mixtures containing smaller doses of remifentanil. When 10 µg/kg/infusion midazolam was combined with 0.1 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil, monkeys chose the mixture over 0.32 µg/kg/infusion remifentanil alone. Thus, monkeys prefer some opioid/benzodiazepine mixtures to larger doses of the opioid alone, suggesting that opioid/benzodiazepine coabuse might be due to increased potency (and possibly effectiveness) of opioids to produce reinforcing effects.

Benzodiazepines

Benzodiazepines have been in clinical use since the 1960s. Benzodiazepines act through allosteric modulation of the GABA_A receptor to enhance the activity of GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter, resulting in a slowing of neurotransmission and sedative and anxiolytic effects. Initially benzodiazepines were thought to have low dependence liability, though over time there has been increasing evidence of benzodiazepine dependence. Benzodiazepines are commonly used to treat anxiety and insomnia, though increasingly they are considered second line treatments for most indications. Concerns about the effects of benzodiazepines on cognition, falls and their implication in opioid related mortality have emerged. Few pharmacological treatments for benzodiazepine dependence have been shown to be effective with gradual taper the most common treatment strategy for benzodiazepine dependence.

Modification of ethanol's reinforcing effectiveness in rhesus monkeys by cocaine, flunitrazepam, or gamma-hydroxybutyrate

BACKGROUND

Although ethanol is frequently used in combination with other psychoactive drugs, the behavioral and pharmacological reasons for this form of polydrug abuse have not been well described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rhesus monkeys with indwelling intravenous catheters produced intravenous injections of ethanol (50, 100, or 200 mg/kg/inj), flunitrazepam (0.001-0.03 mg/kg/inj), cocaine (0.01 or 0.03 mg/kg/inj), or combinations of ethanol and these drugs or gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) (1.0 or 3.2 mg/kg/inj) by lever pressing according to a fixed-ratio schedule. The response requirement for each drug or drug combination was increased across sessions (10, 32, 100, 320, or 1,000). The dependent variables were rates of responding maintained by the drug or drug combination and the elasticity of drug demand when consumption was expressed as a function of price.

RESULTS

Elasticity (P (max)) values for each drug varied among the monkeys but retained the same rank order for the monkeys, suggesting a fundamental difference in the animals' apparent sensitivities to the reinforcing effects of the drugs. Combining ethanol with the other drugs did not increase their reinforcing effectiveness. GHB (ineffective in previous studies) did not modify ethanol's reinforcing effects; demand functions for the combination of ethanol and flunitrazepam were slightly less elastic than for ethanol alone, but no different from that for flunitrazepam alone; adding ethanol to cocaine detracted from the reinforcing effectiveness of cocaine.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesis that use of ethanol in combination with sedative and stimulant drugs is due to an ability of ethanol to enhance the reinforcing effects of these drugs is not supported.

Self-injection of flunitrazepam alone and in the context of methadone maintenance in baboons

Patients in methadone maintenance programs use benzodiazepines to "boost" methadone's subjective effects, and flunitrazepam has been prominent in this context. Self-administration of flunitrazepam (0.001-0.32 mg/kg i.v.) alone and during daily oral methadone administration was evaluated in three baboons. Flunitrazepam maintained self-injection as an inverted U-shaped function of dose at rates higher than those maintained by most other benzodiazepines under the same procedure. In the context of demonstrated physical dependence on 3.2 mg/kg/day p.o. methadone, flunitrazepam doses on the ascending limb of the dose-effect curve maintained greater rates of self-injection than before methadone in two baboons. When the methadone dose decreased to 1.8 mg/kg/day, self-injection remained higher for those baboons and became higher than before methadone for the third baboon. Self-injection remained higher when methadone decreased to 1.0 mg/kg/day, except self-injection of the lowest flunitrazepam dose returned to or below the pre-methadone rate for two baboons. After methadone was discontinued, the dose-effect curve shifted to the right in one baboon but remained to the left in two. Flunitrazepam thus served as a reinforcer alone and in the context of methadone maintenance. Lower doses maintained higher self-injection during and shortly after methadone maintenance. Further research should explore the duration of higher self-injection rates following methadone maintenance.

Principles of drug abuse liability assessment in laboratory animals

This paper describes the rationale for use of preclinical assessments of abuse liability in laboratory animals, and then discusses "cross-cutting" methodological issues that apply to behavioral evaluations intended to contribute to an abuse liability evaluation package. Issues include use of: (1) positive and negative control conditions; (2) full dose-effect evaluations, (3) multiple dependent measures, (4) pharmacokinetic evaluations to guide choice of dose ranges, (5) a species for which good methodological and comparative data are available to aid interpretation of results, and (6) appropriate methods for the group or single-subject experimental design selected. The remainder of the paper describes basic methodology by which three core pieces of behavioral data required by the Food and Drug Administration for its use in the overall abuse liability analysis can be obtained preclinically. Reinforcing effects are assessed in study of drug self-administration; drug discrimination assesses degree of overlap of interoceptive stimulus effects with relevant comparison drugs; physical dependence potential is determined by assessing whether a withdrawal syndrome occurs after chronic drug administration. Background and methodological issues specific to each procedure are discussed. A key consideration for cross-cutting and specific methodological issues is that choices made enable confident interpretation of both positive and negative results.