High-performance liquid chromatographic method for quantification of busulfan in plasma after derivatization by tetrafluorothiophenol

Evaluation of Busulfan as a Third-Party Immunoassay on a Clinical Chemistry Analyzer

BACKGROUND

Busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens to prepare patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical due to large inter- and intra-individual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and the risk of adverse consequences of toxicity including hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Busulfan is most commonly measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is not as widely available in clinical laboratories as automated routine clinical chemistry analyzers. The objective was to perform analytical verification of a busulfan immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform.

METHODS

The MyCare Oncology busulfan immunoassay was configured as a third-party reagent on the Abbott Alinity c. Imprecision, linearity, sample carryover, and onboard stability of reagent studies were evaluated. The performance of the busulfan immunoassay using the Abbott Alinity c was compared to the Beckman Coulter AU480 using sodium heparinized plasma, as well as to LC-MS/MS using lithium heparinized plasma.

RESULTS

The imprecision goal of 8% was met, and linearity within the analytical measurement range of 240 to 1700 ng/mL was verified. Sample carryover was negligible, and the reagents were stable onboard for at least 84 days. The busulfan immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS (slope = 0.949, y-intercept = -7.8 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9935) and the Beckman Coulter AU480 (slope = 1.090, y-intercept = -34.5 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9988).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated successful analytical verification of a busulfan third-party immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. The ability to perform TDM of busulfan on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer will positively impact turnaround times to improve patient outcomes.

Development and Validation of a Novel LC-MS/MS Method for a TDM-Guided Personalization of HSCT Conditioning with High-Dose Busulfan in Children

Personalization of busulfan (Bu) exposure via therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for patients treated with high-dose conditioning regimens. Several laboratories' developed methods are available in the literature with a lack of standardization. The aim of this study is to develop a new standardized LC-MS/MS method and validate it according to the international ICH M10 (EMA) guidelines. Our method is based on rapid protein precipitation from 50 µL plasma followed by separation on a reversed-phase C-18 UHPLC column after the addition of deuterated internal standard and has been tested on real samples from pediatric patients treated with myeloablative conditioning regimens, including Bu, before autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The validated LC-MS/MS method is linear over wide concentration ranges (125-2000 ng/mL), accurate, and reproducible in the absence of matrix effects, allowing for the specific and rapid quantification of Bu and allowing next-dose recommendations to be made in a timely fashion to answer clinicians' needs. Given the lack of data on the stability of Bu in real clinical samples, stability was assessed both on quality controls and on real samples to set up a robust protocol in real-life conditions. This novel LC-MS/MS method is suitable for application to the TDM-guided personalization of conditioning treatments with high-dose busulfan in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT.

Simultaneously measure the concentrations of busulfan and phenytoin in human plasma using an HPLC-MS/MS method: Application to the TDM for children underwent hematological stem cell transplantation

In this work, a simple and rapid high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to carry out the simultaneous measurement of busulfan (BU) and phenytoin (PHT) in the plasma of children. In this method, plasma sample could be prepared by one-step protein precipitation using 1 mL of methanol/water (1:1, v/v). After centrifugation (14,500 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C), 10 μL of the supernatant was injected into a Hypersil Gold C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for separation by gradient elution. Quantification was carried out using multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) under positive scan mode. In the method verification, the calibration curves of BU and PHT showed satisfactory linearity (r > 0.99) at the concentration ranging from 0.02 to 20 μg mL−1. The accuracy and precision were tested at four concentration levels (including the LLOQ level) with the relative error (RE) ranging from −0.80% to 11.45% and coefficient of variation (CV) between 0.93% and 7.74%. There was no pronounced matrix effect to interfere with the quantitative analysis. Compared to determine BU and PHT using two individual methods, less pre-treatment process, labor and blood sample volume are required in this proposed method. Finally, this method was successfully applied to the therapeutic drug monitoring of BU and PHT for children underwent hematological stem cell transplantation.

Evaluation of a Nanoparticle-Based Busulfan Immunoassay for Rapid Analysis on Routine Clinical Analyzers

BACKGROUND

Busulfan is an alkylating agent used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for various malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan is common because busulfan exposure has been linked to veno-occlusive disease, disease relapse, and failed engraftment. The authors developed an automated immunoassay, along with stable calibrators and controls, and quantified busulfan in sodium heparin plasma.

METHODS

The authors evaluated a homogenous nanoparticle immunoassay, the MyCare Oncology Busulfan Assay Kit (Saladax Biomedical, Inc), for precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and linearity on an open channel clinical chemistry analyzer; they compared the method with 2 mass spectrometry methods (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry), using anonymized, remnant patient samples.

RESULTS

The coefficients of variation for repeatability and within-laboratory precision were ≤9.0%. The linear range was 150-2000 ng/mL; samples up to 6000 ng/mL can be measured with sample dilution. Measured values deviated by ≤14% from assigned values. Comparison between validated mass spectrometry methods resulted in a correlation coefficient R ≥ 0.995.

CONCLUSIONS

The MyCare Busulfan Assay Kit shows the precision, accuracy, linearity, and test range for performing busulfan concentration measurements in sodium heparin plasma on routine clinical chemistry analyzers.

UPLC-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantification of Busulfan in Human Plasma: Application to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent commonly used in preparative regimens for hematologic malignant and non-malignant patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The objective of the present study was to develop an UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of Bu in human plasma. A total of 55 patients with hematologic malignancies (n = 34) and non- malignancies (n = 21) received myeloablative Bu therapy prior to HSCT. A tandem mass spectrometric method was developed and validated to quantify Bu levels in these patients. The method was fully validated over the concentration range of 25–2000 ng/mL (r > 0.99). The assay method demonstrated good precision and accuracy. Stability studies indicated that the drug was stable in various conditions. Incurred sample reanalysis findings were within acceptable ranges (<15% of the nominal concentration). Based on the 1^st dose AUC results, one third of hematologic malignant patients and half of non-malignant patients needed dose adjustment. However, in subsequent doses (5^th, 9^th, and 13^th), 77%, 82% and 82%, respectively, of hematologic malignant patients and 71%, 67% and 86%, respectively, of non-malignant patients achieved the target range of Bu AUC. The suitability of the developed method for routine TDM of Bu in HSCT patients was demonstrated. The study suggests that the pharmacokinetic profile of Bu varies in both groups.

A rapid HPLC-MS/MS method for determining busulfan in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative detection of busulfan (BU) in children's hemolytic samples by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was established. In this study, the sample preparation procedure involved a one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile (ACN) solution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method used Hypersil GOLD C₁₈ . The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) and ACN with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring modes were used for quantitative analysis and the ion pairs of BU and BU-d8 were m/z 263.9 → 150.9 and 272.0 → 159.0, respectively. BU had a good linearity in the range of 0.01-10 μg mL^-1 . The intra- and inter-day relative error was between -7.21% and 8.26%, and the coefficient of variation was less than 12.64%. The average extraction recovery rate in plasma samples was 99.76% ± 6.53%, and the matrix in normal plasma and hemolyzed plasma had no significant effect on the detection results. Normal and hemolytic samples could maintain good stability at 4, 25 and -40°C. As a result, this method is particularly suitable for determining BU in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and this study provides the methodological basis for further research on the pharmacokinetics of BU in children with HSCT.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Busulfan for the Management of Pediatric Patients: Cross-Validation of Methods and Long-Term Performance

BACKGROUND

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent used as part of the conditioning regimen in pediatric patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite intravenous (IV) administration and dosing recommendations based on age and weight, reports have revealed interindividual variability in Bu pharmacokinetics and the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this context, adjusting doses to Bu's narrow therapeutic window is advised. We aimed to assess the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu in children, the reliability of Bu quantification methods, and its stability in plasma when stored for up to 5 years.

METHODS

Eighteen patients from our TDM center (252 samples) were included. All of them received a 2-hour Bu IV infusion 4 times daily for a total of 16 doses. The first dose of Bu was age/weight-based, and the subsequent doses were adjusted from third or fifth dose onward based on the estimated first dose pharmacokinetic parameters to target steady-state concentrations (Css) of 600-900 ng/mL. The performance of our unit's high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method was assessed using a quality control (QC, 35 series) chart. International, multicenter, cross-validation test (n = 21) was conducted to validate different analytical methods. To assess Bu stability, regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots were performed on measurements at repeated time points on samples stored at -80°C for up to 5 years.

RESULTS

We observed a 4.2-fold interindividual variability in Bu Css after the first dose, with only 28% of children having a Css within the target range. During the 4 days of conditioning, 83% of children had their doses modified according to TDM recommendations. This achieved a Css within the target range in 75% of the children. Routine QC measurements were generally within the ±15% range around theoretical values, showing the optimal robustness of our center's analytical method. Two of the 21 Bu TDM centers returned inadequate results during cross-validation testing; both used a UV detection method. Storage at -80°C led to a fall in Bu content of 14.9% ± 13.4% at 2-4 years and of 20% ± 5% by 5 years (roverall = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that TDM is an effective method of achieving targeted Bu levels in children. QC programs are crucial to monitoring and maintaining the quality of an analytical method.

A simplified method for busulfan monitoring using dried blood spot in combination with liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

Busulfan (Bu) is an important component of the myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) especially in children. Intravenously administered Bu exhibits a therapeutic window phenomenon requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Analytical methods developed for Bu routine monitoring were aimed at using low volumes of biological fluids and development of simple procedures to facilitate the dosage adjustment. In this report, we describe a simple, rapid method for Bu measurement using dried blood spots (DBS) from only 5 μL of whole blood.

METHODS

Bu extracted from DBS with methanol was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode using D8-Bu as an internal standard. The method was in-house validated evaluating trueness, repeatability, within-laboratory reproducibility, specificity and the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ).

RESULTS

The method was linear in the calibration range of 100-2000 ng mL(-1) (r(2)>0.99) encompassing the therapeutic concentrations of Bu. A good trueness (<14%), precision (<10%), and recovery (100%) were observed during validation of the method with quality controls of 300, 600 and 1400 ng mL(-1). The LLOQ was determined as 50 ng mL(-1) and no matrix or carryover effects were observed. The validated method was applied to measure Bu levels in four children receiving infusion of Bu prior to HSCT. A good correlation was observed between the Bu levels measured by DBS and dried plasma spot (DPS) (r(2) =0.96) and between DPS and the GC/MS method (r(2) =0.92). Bu was found to be stable in DBS up to 6 h at room temperature and for 24 h at 4 °C.

CONCLUSIONS

The new DBS method facilitates earlier dosage adjustment during Bu therapy by its specific and simple procedure using 5 μL of whole blood.

Comparison of LC-MS Assay and HPLC Assay of Busulfan in Clinical Pharmacokinetics Studies

Busulfan is used in preparative regimens for bone marrow transplantation and timely busulfan plasma concentration reporting is critical for subsequent dose adjustment. We compared two sensitive methods for pharmacokinetics studies including LC-MS assay and HPLC precolumn derivatization assay. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Gemini C18 column. Liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate was used for plasma sample preparation. Busulfan and internal standard ([2H8]-busulfan) were detected as ammonium adducts at m/z 264.2 and 272.2 for LC-MS assay. For HPLC assay, the extraction from plasma was derivatized with 2-naphathalenethiol using synthesized internal standard (1,6-(methanesulfonyloxy)octane). The Ex and Em wavelength was 255 nm and 370 nm. The limit of detection was 15.6 ng/mL and 7.8 ng/mL for HPLC and LC-MS assay and good linearity ranging from 31.25–1000 ng/mL for HPLC and 15.6-1000 ng/mL for LC-MS assay. The intra and interday assay precision were less than 9.2% and 12.0% for LC-MS and HPLC assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental pharmacokinetic model with WinNonlin. Busulfan AUClast showed an average difference of 0.7% between the two methods. The LC-MS method is accurate, reproducible, and requires less specimen, sample preparation and analysis time over the HPLC assay, making busulfan monitoring faster and easier in clinical practice.

Near infrared spectroscopy and process analytical technology to master the process of busulfan paediatric capsules in a university hospital

The prescription of unlicensed oral medicines in paediatrics leads the hospital pharmacists to compound hard capsules, such as busulfan, an alkylating agent prescribed in preparative regimens for bone marrow transplantation. In this study, we have investigated how the general principle of process analytical technology (PAT) can be implemented at the small size of our hospital pharmacy manufacturing unit. Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was calibrated for raw material identification, blend uniformity analysis and final content uniformity of busulfan hard capsules of 11 different strengths. Measurements were performed on capsules from 2 to 40 mg (n=440). After optimisation, accuracy and linearity of the NIRS quantitative method was demonstrated after comparison with a previously validated quantitative high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) method. Such a comparison led to attractive NIRS precision: +/-0.7 to +/-1.0 mg for capsules from 2 to 40 mg, respectively. As NIRS is a rapid and non-destructive technique, the individual control of a whole batch of busulfan paediatric capsules intended to be administrated is possible. Actually, mastering the process of busulfan paediatric capsules with the NIRS integrated into the notion of PAT is a powerful analytical tool to assess the process quality and to perform content uniformity of at least 5mg busulfan-containing capsules.

Quantification of Busulfan in Saliva and Plasma in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Busulfan pharmacokinetic studies suggest that an individual dosing strategy may be necessary to optimise systemic exposure in order to decrease toxicity and improve outcome in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic and toxic effects of the busulfan/cyclophosphamide regimen have been related to the area under the busulfan plasma concentration-time curve. Because of practical limitations in obtaining blood from children, saliva was evaluated as an alternative matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring, offering the advantages of a non-invasive, rapid and easy sampling procedure. Another objective was to evaluate an easy and robust liquid chromatography- tandem mass spectrometry method for plasma and saliva busulfan determination.

METHODS

An online extraction cartridge with column-switching technique, analytical liquid chromatography over a Chromolith RP 18 e column, and tandem mass spectrometry were used to quantify busulfan concentrations in matched plasma and saliva samples. The study population consisted of ten patients, aged 1.3-19 years (median age 11.8 years, seven females, three males), undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All patients received busulfan 0.8-1.3 mg/kg orally every 6 hours for a total of 16 doses, followed by two doses of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/day).

RESULTS

The lowest limit of detection was 2 microg/L and the lower limit of quantification was 10 microg/L. Only 100 microL of plasma/saliva was needed. The mean recoveries (SD) of busulfan were 97.2% (2.7) in plasma and 100.4% (1.3) in saliva. Intra- and inter-assay imprecision was 2-3% and 2-4% for plasma, and 1-2% and 2-4% for saliva (concentration range 30-1,500 microg/L). The bias was <4% for both plasma and saliva. The correlation between the busulfan concentration in plasma and saliva was highly significant (r=0.958; p<0.0001; saliva/plasma ratio=1.09+/-0.04; n=69 sample pairs). The apparent plasma clearance was slightly higher than the apparent saliva clearance (202+/-31 mL/h/kg vs 189+/-28 mL/h/kg; p=0.001). The mean elimination half-life was found to be 2.31+/-0.46 hours for plasma and 2.30+/-0.36 hours for saliva; these were not significantly different (p=0.83).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that busulfan analysis in saliva could be a valuable and reliable alternative to plasma analysis.

Randomized trial of two different conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplantation in thalassemia – the role of busulfan pharmacokinetics in determining outcome

In total, 94 patients with homozygous beta thalassemia were randomized to two different conditioning regimens: busulfan 600 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg or busulfan 16 mg/kg + cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg and antilymphocyte globulin (47 in each group), for bone marrow transplantation, to see whether increased myeloablation or increased immunosuppression would reduce rejection. Busulfan pharmacokinetics in determining outcome was evaluated. There was no significant difference in engraftment, graft-versus-host disease, rejection, and overall and disease-free survival in the two groups. Systemic exposure to busulfan was significantly higher in the 600 mg/m2 group, but in both groups there was a wide interindividual variation in the busulfan kinetics. Six patients rejected the graft, two in the busulfan 600 mg group and four in busulfan 16 mg group (P = 0.677 CI -0.17, 0.07), but in five patients (pharmacokinetic data not available in one patient) who rejected the graft busulfan first dose trough level (C(min)-1) was below 150 ng/ml while it was above this level in the 66 of 68 patients with successful engraftment (P < or = 0.001). This randomized trial shows that rejection is influenced by busulfan levels and suggests that monitoring of busulfan levels and dose adjustment based on first-dose kinetics may reduce the risk of rejection.

Development of a rapid and specific assay for detection of busulfan in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

A sensitive and specific assay for detection of busulfan in human plasma was developed. The assay is based on rapid isolation of busulfan by liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate, and detection by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry. 1,6-Bis(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane, a synthesized analogue of busulfan, was used as the internal standard (IS). The acquisition was performed in the multiple reaction monitoring mode; busulfan and the IS were detected with no interferences from plasma matrix. The method was linear over the range 5-2500 ng mL(-1), with r2 > 0.99 and a run time of only 3.5 min. The intra- and inter-assay precisions were in the ranges 2.1-11.9% and 3.2-10.1%, respectively, and the intra- and inter-assay accuracies were 92.2-107.6% and 94.7-104.1%, respectively. The absolute recoveries were 82.0% (20 ng mL(-1)), 90.6% (1000 ng mL(-1)) and 80.0% (2000 ng mL(-1)) for busulfan, and 89.1% for the IS (1000 ng mL(-1)). The limits of detection and quantification were 2 and 5 ng mL(-1), respectively. The validated method was successfully applied to analyze plasma samples obtained from six adults receiving doses of 1 mg kg(-1) in a conditioning regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation. A marked intra-patient variation in busulfan concentrations during the steady state was observed, which limits the application of pharmacokinetic modeling and suggests that continuous therapeutic monitoring is necessary for adequate individualized dosing. In this regard, the present assay brings important advantages relative to other methods described in the literature, i.e., it is highly specific and simple to perform, with a rapid chromatographic run time (3.5 min), and the whole procedure can be completed in 4-5 h, which would permit dose corrections after the third dose allowing earlier and better dosing adjustments towards the target level of busulfan.

Glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphism: a risk factor for hepatic venoocclusive disease in bone marrow transplantation

Hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD) in bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is attributed to toxicity of cytoreductive agents, especially busulfan and cyclophosphamide, in the conditioning therapy. Busulfan, as well as the metabolites of cyclophosphamide, are conjugated with glutathione (GSH), catalyzed by enzymes of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) family. To assess the impact of polymorphisms of the GST genes, GSTM1 and GSTT1, on the risk of HVOD, we evaluated 114 consecutive patients with beta-thalassemia major undergoing BMT. There was a significantly increased incidence of HVOD in patients with the GSTM1-null genotype compared with those with the GSTM1-positive genotype (46.5% vs 18.3%; P =.001). Pharmacokinetic analysis in these patients showed that the clearance of busulfan was higher and first-dose steady-state concentration was lower among those with HVOD (0.403 +/- 0.06 vs 0.33 +/- 0.071 L/h/kg, Student t test P value =.000 01; and 508 +/- 125 vs 656 +/- 255 ng/mL, t test P value =.001, respectively). We conclude that the GSTM1-null genotype predisposes to HVOD, and the sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocyte damage may be mediated by metabolites of busulfan through depletion of the cellular GSH pool.

Separation methods for alkylating antineoplastic compounds

The separating method for alkylating neoplastic compounds were reviewed based on the classification of the Merck Index (12th Edition). Each section, whenever available or relevant, was subdivided according to the following approach: stability studies, extraction methods, gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. At the end of each chapter a separate table summarizing the main characteristics of the separating method were established. In particular LODs and/or LOQs were expressed as quantity to facilitate comparison between methods. This review highlights the problems to measure trace levels of these compounds into biological fluids with respect to their instability, adsorption to glass and plastic or derivatization requirements. Over the last decades, HPLC seems to be more popular than GC for separating the alkylating agents. The development of narrow- or microbore LC coupled to MS is certainly the way to further improve both separation and sensitivity obtained in the different papers surveyed for this review.

Quantification of busulfan in plasma by liquid chromatography-ion spray mass spectrometry. Application to pharmacokinetic studies in children

Optimisation of busulfan dosage in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation is recommended in order to reduce toxic effects associated with high drug exposure. A new method was developed coupling liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and was validated for the determination of busulfan concentrations in plasma. Recovery was 86.7%, the limit of detection was 2.5 ng/ml and linearity ranged from 5 to 2500 ng/ml. The correlation between the busulfan concentrations measured by our previously published HPLC-UV method and the new HPLC-MS method was highly significant (P<0.0001). Sample volume was reduced and the method was rapid, sensitive and less expensive than the methods previously used in our laboratory. This method was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of busulfan after the first administration of 1 mg/kg orally, in 13 children receiving the drug as part of the preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Our results were similar to previously reported data. They showed that the apparent oral clearance of busulfan was 0.299+/-0.08 l/h/kg, and that it was significantly higher (P=0.02) in patients below the age of 5 years than in older children.

Evaluation of existing limited sampling models for busulfan kinetics in children with beta thalassaemia major undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Busulfan pharmacokinetic parameters are useful in predicting the outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Standard pharmacokinetic measurements require multiple blood samples. Various limited sampling models (LSM) have been proposed for reducing the sample number required for these measurements, essentially for patients with malignant disorders undergoing BMT. This study was undertaken to evaluate the existing LSM for busulfan pharmacokinetics to find out the most suitable method for patients with thalassaemia major undergoing BMT. Busulfan levels in plasma samples were analysed by HPLC. The AUC calculated by non-compartmental analysis using the program 'TOPFIT' was compared with previously published LSMs. Our seven sample pharmacokinetic data for AUC calculation was compared with the published LSMs. The three sample models suggested by Chattergoon et al and Schuler et al showed significant agreement with AUC TOPFIT (R(2) = 0.98 and 0.94, respectively) in our clinical context. Other models resulted in significant over or under representation of observed values (Vassal's model R(2) = 0.61; Chattergoon's two sample model R(2) = 0.84; four sample model R(2) = 0.83; Schuler's two sample model R(2) = 0.79). By these data the three sample LSM proposed by Chattergoon et al and Schuler et al are suitable for calculation of the AUC in patients with thalassaemia major undergoing BMT conditioned with oral busulfan.

Sensitive and Rapid Quantification of Busulfan in Small Plasma Volumes by Liquid Chromatography–Electrospray Mass Spectrometry

Background: High-dose busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both adults and children. Large interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics after oral administration has been reported; therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan may decrease the incidence of drug-related toxicity (for example, hepatic venoocclusive disease) and may also improve therapeutic efficacy.

Methods: Busulfan concentrations were quantified using 200 μL of plasma and liquid–liquid extraction with diethyl ether after the addition of [2H8]busulfan as the internal standard. Separation and detection of busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were achieved with a LUNA C8 column (5 μm; 150 × 2 mm i.d.) at 30 °C, a HP 1100 liquid chromatography system, and a HP 1100 single-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Busulfan and [2H8]busulfan were detected as ammonium adducts in selected-ion monitoring mode at m/z 264.2 and 272.2, respectively.

Results: The calibration curve was linear at 5–2000 μg/L busulfan. Intra- and interassay imprecision (CV) and bias were both &lt;11%. The limits of detection and quantification were 2 and 5 μg/L, respectively. Extraction recovery of busulfan was &gt;87%. Analysis of pharmacokinetics in four patients receiving high-dose busulfan indicated that minimum busulfan concentrations before the next dose were 405–603 μg/L, with no interference observed.

Conclusions: The new rapid and sensitive liquid chromatographic–mass spectrometric assay is an appropriate method for quantification of busulfan in human plasma, making therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan faster and easier in clinical practice.

Rapid and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method for busulfan assay in plasma

A reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection has been developed to determine busulfan concentrations in plasma of children undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Plasma samples (200 microl) containing busulfan and 1,6-bis(methanesulfonyloxy)hexane as an internal standard were prepared by a simple derivatization method with diethyldithiocarbamate followed by extraction with ethyl acetate and solid-phase purification on C8 columns conditioned with methanol and water and eluted with acetonitrile (recovery 99%). Chromatography was accomplished using a Hypersil octadecylsilyl column (10 cm x 4.6 mm I.D.) and a mobile phase of acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran and distilled water (65:5:30, v/v). The limit of detection was 25 ng/ml (signal-to-noise ratio of 5). Calibration curves were linear up to 25,000 ng/ml. Intra-day and inter-day coefficients of variation of the assay were < or =5%. This method was used to analyse busulfan plasma concentrations after oral administration within the framework of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies in children.