Dydrogesterone does not reverse the effects of estradiol on endothelium-dependant vasodilation in postmenopausal women: a randomised clinical trial

A review of the risk and precipitating factors for spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Introduction

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) accounts for 1%-4% of cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). SCAD is caused by separation occurring within or between any of the three tunics of the coronary artery wall. This leads to intramural hematoma and/or formation of false lumen in the artery, which leads to ischemic changes or infarction of the myocardium. The incidence of SCAD is higher in women than in men, with a ratio of approximately 9:1. It is estimated that SCAD is responsible for 35% of ACS cases in women under the age of 60. The high frequency is particularly observed during pregnancy and in the peripartum period (first week). Traditional risk factors are rare in patients with SCAD, except for hypertension. Patients diagnosed with SCAD have different combinations of risk factors compared with patients who have atherosclerotic changes in their coronary arteries. We presented the most common so-called "non-traditional" risk factors associated with SCAD patients.

Risk factors and precipitating disorders which are associated with SCAD

In the literature, there are few diseases frequently associated with SCAD, and they are identified as predisposing factors. The predominant cause is fibromuscular dysplasia, followed by inherited connective tissue disorders, systemic inflammatory diseases, pregnancy, use of sex hormones or steroids, use of cocaine or amphetamines, thyroid disorders, migraine, and tinnitus. In recent years, the genetic predisposition for SCAD is also recognized as a predisposing factor. The precipitating factors are also different in women (emotional stress) compared with those in men (physical stress). Women experiencing SCAD frequently describe symptoms of anxiety and depression. These conditions could increase shear stress on the arterial wall and dissection of the coronary artery wall. Despite the advancement of SCAD, we can find significant differences in the clinical presentation between women and men.

Conclusion

When evaluating patients with chest pain or other ACS symptoms who have a low cardiovascular risk, particularly female patients, it is important to consider the possibility of ACS due to SCAD, particularly in conditions often associated with SCAD. This will increase the recognition of SCAD and the timely treatment of affected patients.

Sex differences in micro- and macro-vascular complications of diabetes mellitus

Vascular complications are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in both men and women with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus, however the prevalence, progression and pathophysiology of both microvascular (nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy) and macrovascular [coronary heart disease (CHD), myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and stroke] disease are different in the two sexes. In general, men appear to be at a higher risk for diabetic microvascular complications, while the consequences of macrovascular complications may be greater in women. Interestingly, in the absence of diabetes, women have a far lower risk of either micro- or macro-vascular disease compared with men for much of their lifespan. Thus, the presence of diabetes confers greater risk for vascular complications in women compared with men and some of the potential reasons, including contribution of sex hormones and sex-specific risk factors are discussed in this review. There is a growing body of evidence that sex hormones play an important role in the regulation of cardiovascular function. While estrogens are generally considered to be cardioprotective and androgens detrimental to cardiovascular health, recent findings challenge these assumptions and demonstrate diversity and complexity of sex hormone action on target tissues, especially in the setting of diabetes. While some progress has been made toward understanding the underlying mechanisms of sex differences in the pathophysiology of diabetic vascular complications, many questions and controversies remain. Future research leading to understanding of these mechanisms may contribute to personalized- and sex-specific treatment for diabetic micro- and macro-vascular disease.

Habitual aerobic exercise does not protect against micro- or macrovascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women

Aging causes micro- and macrovascular endothelial dysfunction, as assessed by endothelium-dependent dilation (EDD), which can be prevented and reversed by habitual aerobic exercise (AE) in men. However, in estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women, whole forearm microvascular EDD has not been studied, and a beneficial effect of AE on macrovascular EDD has not been consistently shown. We assessed forearm blood flow in response to brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine (FBFACh), a measure of whole forearm microvascular EDD, and brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a measure of macrovascular EDD, in 12 premenopausal sedentary women (Pre-S; 24 ± 1 yr; V̇o2max = 37.5 ± 1.6 ml·kg-1·min-1), 25 estrogen-deficient postmenopausal sedentary women (Post-S; 62 ± 1 yr; V̇o2max = 24.7 ± 0.9 ml·kg-1·min-1), and 16 estrogen-deficient postmenopausal AE-trained women (Post-AE; 59 ± 1 yr; V̇o2max = 40.4 ± 1.4 ml·kg-1·min-1). FBFACh was lower in Post-S and Post-AE compared with Pre-S women (135 ± 9 and 116 ± 17 vs. 193 ± 21 AUC, respectively, both P < 0.008), whereas Post-S and Post-AE women were not different (P = 0.3). Brachial artery FMD was 34% (5.73 ± 0.67%) and 45% (4.79 ± 0.57%) lower in Post-S and Post-AE, respectively, vs. Pre-S women (8.69 ± 0.95%, both P ≤ 0.01), but not different between Post-S and Post-AE women (P = 0.3). Post-AE women had lower circulating C-reactive protein and oxidized low-density lipoprotein compared with Post-S women (0.5 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2 mg/l and 40 ± 4 vs. 55 ± 3 U/l, respectively, both P = 0.01), but these markers were not correlated to FBFACh (P = 0.3) or brachial artery FMD (P = 0.8). These findings are consistent with the idea that habitual AE does not protect against age/menopause-related whole forearm micro- and macrovascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy nonobese estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women, despite being associated with lower systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY

This is the first study to demonstrate that habitual aerobic exercise may not protect against age/menopause-related whole forearm microvascular endothelial dysfunction in healthy nonobese estrogen-deficient postmenopausal women, consistent with recent findings regarding macrovascular endothelial function. This is in contrast to what is observed in healthy middle-aged and older aerobic exercise-trained men.

Effect of hormone replacement therapy with the anti-mineralocorticoid progestin Drospirenone compared to tibolone on endothelial function and central haemodynamics in post-menopausal women

Drospirenone (DRSP) is an antialdosterone agent with progestogenic and antiandrogenic effects. This compound, has been recently used in combination with 17β-estradiol (E2) as hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women and has been shown to exert a significant antihypertensive effect in hypertensive post-menopausal women. Aim of the present study was to compare the effect of DRSP/E2 with those of Tibolone (T) on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and lipid profile of early postmenopausal women naïve on post-menopausal hormonal therapy. Twenty-four women met the inclusion criteria and entered the study. Women were randomized to receive either DRSP/E2 or T for 6months. Blood pressure and heart rate were similar in both groups at baseline and at the end of the study. Compared to baseline, endothelial function assessed by Reactive Hyperemia (RH) significantly improved in women receiving E2/DRSP, whereas no significant differences between baseline and follow up were detected in women receiving Tibolone. Women receiving E2/DRSP showed a significant decrease in pulse wave velocity and Augmentation Index compared to baseline while no changes were observed in women receiving Tibolone. The capacity of sera to trigger endothelial cells apoptosis in vitro measured by cell death assay was significantly reduced by E/DRSP but not by T (HFA-E 70±5,6% vs HFD-E 41±4,5%, p<0,001). In conclusion, the present study shows that the association of Estradiol and Drospirenone as hormonal replacement therapy significantly improves vascular parameters and the composition of sera relevant for vascular protection in early post-menopausal normotensive women. These effects are not shared by Tibolone.

Estrogens and Coronary Artery Disease: New Clinical Perspectives

In premenopausal women, endogenous estrogens are associated with reduced prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Clinical trials conducted in the 1990s such as HERS, WHI, and WISDOM have shown that postmenopausal treatment with horse hormone mixtures (so-called conjugated equine estrogens) and synthetic progestins adversely affects female cardiovascular health. Our understanding of rapid (nongenomic) and chronic (genomic) estrogen signaling has since advanced considerably, including identification of a new G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), which like the "classical" receptors ERα and ERβ is highly abundant in the cardiovascular system. Here, we discuss the role of estrogen receptors in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and review natural and synthetic ligands of estrogen receptors as well as their effects in physiology, on cardiovascular risk factors, and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Data from preclinical and clinical studies using nonselective compounds activating GPER, which include selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen or raloxifene, selective estrogen receptor downregulators such as Faslodex™ (fulvestrant/ICI 182,780), vitamin B3 (niacin), green tea catechins, and soy flavonoids such as genistein or resveratrol, strongly suggest that activation of GPER may afford therapeutic benefit for primary and secondary prevention in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Evidence from preclinical studies suggest similar efficacy profiles for selective small molecule GPER agonists such as G-1 which are devoid of uterotrophic activity. Further clinical research in this area is warranted to provide opportunities for future cardiovascular drug development.

Effects of dydrogesterone on the vascular system

Estrogens exert beneficial effects on the vascular system, while progestogens generally have a negative impact (e.g. vasoconstrictor effects on the arterial system). In contrast, dydrogesterone appears to be largely neutral in terms of biochemical markers and indirect clinical endpoints, such as blood pressure, that act as surrogate markers for vascular function. Studies on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, which can also influence vascular function, demonstrate that the addition of dydrogesterone intensifies rather than attenuates beneficial estrogenic effects. Dydrogesterone also has largely neutral effects on hemostasis. Since there are relatively few data available on clinical parameters such as blood flow measurements, especially in women with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, increased risks cannot be excluded for a combination of estrogen replacement with dydrogesterone. Further studies should focus on this open question since dydrogesterone, with its largely neutral properties, might be a suitable option, including for older women already at increased cardiovascular risk.

A dose-response study of hormone replacement in young hypogonadal women: effects on intima media thickness and metabolism

OBJECTIVE

Young hypogonadal women appear to have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. We studied the influence of increasing doses of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on markers of metabolism and vascular physiology.

DESIGN

Nine-month sequential dose-ranging study.

PATIENTS

A total of 25 young hypogonadal women (Turner Syndrome, n = 14; 46,XX gonadal dysgenesis, n = 9), hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (n = 2), mean age 31.9 years (range 18.5-42.2). All subjects sequentially received oral 17beta-oestradiol 1,2 and 4 mg daily in a cyclical formulation for 12 weeks each.

MEASUREMENTS

Metabolic markers and vascular physiology measurements to assess intima media thickness (IMT); arterial stiffness: pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx); endothelial function: flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Results Increasing doses of oestrogen resulted in a reduction in IMT (0.63 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.58 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.56 +/- 0.06 mm at 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg 17beta-oestradiol, respectively, P = 0.001).

RESULTS

were similar in women with Turner Syndrome and normal karyotype. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations increased (1.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.001) and plasma glucose (4.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l, P = 0.038) decreased slightly with the increasing dose of HRT. There was no correlation between the changes in IMT and HDL. Increasing HRT dose had no significant impact on blood pressure, weight, other lipid parameters, insulin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and fibrinogen concentrations or FMD, PWV and AIx.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing doses of HRT result in a reduction in carotid IMT in young hypogonadal women, along with increased serum HDL and decreased plasma glucose. This study raises the possibility that exogenous oestrogen may be cardioprotective in young women, but this observation needs to be balanced against a prothrombotic effect which is predominant in postmenopausal women.

Effects of low-dose continuous combined HRT on vascular function in women with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Improvement in vascular endothelial function is widley cited as a beneficial effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at increased cardiovascular risk and have impaired endothelial function. Any benefits of HRT on endothelial function in this group are of particular interest.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed effects on vascular function of oral 17beta oestradiol (1 mg) and norethisterone (0.5 mg) in postmenopausal women with T2DM.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

ASSESSMENTS

Twenty-eight women had pulse wave velocity (PWV) and adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 assessed before and after three months' treatment. Twenty-four women also had gluteal fat biopsy for assessment of resistance vessel function (using wire myography).

RESULTS

HRT did not affect PWV, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 or carbachol response. Effects of L-NAME and indomethacin on carbachol sensitivity were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This HRT preparation had no detectable effect on these measures of endothelial function in women with T2DM.

Differential effects of progestins on hemostasis

Recently large, prospective, randomized studies on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have indicated that the progestin use might interfere with hemostasis and thus increase venous thrombotic events. Therefore, available publications were evaluated to determine whether progestins interfere with hemostasis, either when given alone via oral or parenteral routes or in combination with ethinylestradiol as synthetic estrogen or natural estrogens. There are indications that such interference is dependent upon the type and dose of the progestin, the route of application, the length of treatment and the type and dose of the estrogen with which it is combined. For natural progesterone, no negative effects on the hemostatic system were seen with either oral or parenteral application, in cyclic or continuous regimens, for the doses investigated. Similarly, no unwanted effects were seen with progestin only pills (POP), independent of the type and dose of progestin, or parenteral progestins. With the high-dose progestins used in gynaecological oncology, the increased activation of the hemostatic system resulting from the disease itself has to be taken into account when looking at any increased incidence of thromboembolic events in these patients. For estrogen/progestin combinations, the risk of venous thromboembolism is attributed to the estrogen used. Recent studies showed an increased rate of thromboembolic events in association with desogestrel-and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives, compared with those containing levonorgestrel. With HRT, a decrease in antithrombin factors could explain the increased rate of venous thrombotic events. In conclusion, progestins seems to have different effects on the hemostatic system due to their different pattern of biological activities. This was also shown in the arterial vascular system, where some progestins may reduce the endothelium-dependent vasodilating action of estrogens and stimulate intima proliferation and upregulate thrombin receptor expression while other progestins did not.

Metabolic and vascular effect of progestins in post-menopausal women. Implications for cardioprotection

Estrogen therapy causes changes in a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, lipoprotein profile, haemostasis, coronary atherosclerosis and vascular reactive, that suggest a potential cardioprotective effect in postmenopausal women. With respect to the role of adjunctive progestins, currently available data suggest that the cardiovascular effects may differ depending on the type, dosage and route of administration of the progestin. Androgenic progestins antagonise the favourable cardiovascular effect of estrogens, whilst non-androgenic progestins do not impair, or may even enhance, the beneficial effect of estrogens. Therefore, less androgenic progestins would appear to be the agent of choice for combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular risk factors.