Responses of cells to stationary and moving sound stimuli in the anterior ectosylvian cortex of cats

The perception of auditory motion in sighted and early blind individuals

Motion perception is a fundamental sensory task that plays a critical evolutionary role. In vision, motion processing is classically described using a motion energy model with spatiotemporally nonseparable filters suited for capturing the smooth continuous changes in spatial position over time afforded by moving objects. However, it is still not clear whether the filters underlying auditory motion discrimination are also continuous motion detectors or infer motion from comparing discrete sound locations over time (spatiotemporally separable). We used a psychophysical reverse correlation paradigm, where participants discriminated the direction of a motion signal in the presence of spatiotemporal noise, to determine whether the filters underlying auditory motion discrimination were spatiotemporally separable or nonseparable. We then examined whether these auditory motion filters were altered as a result of early blindness. We found that both sighted and early blind individuals have separable filters. However, early blind individuals show increased sensitivity to auditory motion, with reduced susceptibility to noise and filters that were more accurate in detecting motion onsets/offsets. Model simulations suggest that this reliance on separable filters is optimal given the limited spatial resolution of auditory input.

Do the Different Sensory Areas Within the Cat Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal Cortex Collectively Represent a Network Multisensory Hub?

Current theory supports that the numerous functional areas of the cerebral cortex are organized and function as a network. Using connectional databases and computational approaches, the cerebral network has been demonstrated to exhibit a hierarchical structure composed of areas, clusters and, ultimately, hubs. Hubs are highly connected, higher-order regions that also facilitate communication between different sensory modalities. One region computationally identified network hub is the visual area of the Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal cortex (AESc) of the cat. The Anterior Ectosylvian Visual area (AEV) is but one component of the AESc that also includes the auditory (Field of the Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcus - FAES) and somatosensory (Fourth somatosensory representation - SIV). To better understand the nature of cortical network hubs, the present report reviews the biological features of the AESc. Within the AESc, each area has extensive external cortical connections as well as among one another. Each of these core representations is separated by a transition zone characterized by bimodal neurons that share sensory properties of both adjoining core areas. Finally, core and transition zones are underlain by a continuous sheet of layer 5 neurons that project to common output structures. Altogether, these shared properties suggest that the collective AESc region represents a multiple sensory/multisensory cortical network hub. Ultimately, such an interconnected, composite structure adds complexity and biological detail to the understanding of cortical network hubs and their function in cortical processing.

Is territorial expansion a mechanism for crossmodal plasticity?

Crossmodal plasticity is the phenomenon whereby, following sensory damage or deprivation, the lost sensory function of a brain region is replaced by one of the remaining senses. One of several proposed mechanisms for this phenomenon involves the expansion of a more active brain region at the expense of another whose sensory inputs have been damaged or lost. This territorial expansion hypothesis was examined in the present study. The cat ectosylvian visual area (AEV) borders the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (FAES), which becomes visually reorganized in the early deaf. If this crossmodal effect in the FAES is due to the expansion of the adjoining AEV into the territory of the FAES after hearing loss, then the reorganized FAES should exhibit connectional features characteristic of the AEV. However, tracer injections revealed significantly different patterns of cortical connectivity between the AEV and the early deaf FAES, and substantial cytoarchitectonic and behavioral distinctions occur as well. Therefore, the crossmodal reorganization of the FAES cannot be mechanistically attributed to the expansion of the adjoining cortical territory of the AEV and an overwhelming number of recent studies now support unmasking of existing connections as the operative mechanism underlying crossmodal plasticity.

Auditory compensation for head rotation is incomplete

Hearing is confronted by a similar problem to vision when the observer moves. The image motion that is created remains ambiguous until the observer knows the velocity of eye and/or head. One way the visual system solves this problem is to use motor commands, proprioception, and vestibular information. These "extraretinal signals" compensate for self-movement, converting image motion into head-centered coordinates, although not always perfectly. We investigated whether the auditory system also transforms coordinates by examining the degree of compensation for head rotation when judging a moving sound. Real-time recordings of head motion were used to change the "movement gain" relating head movement to source movement across a loudspeaker array. We then determined psychophysically the gain that corresponded to a perceptually stationary source. Experiment 1 showed that the gain was small and positive for a wide range of trained head speeds. Hence, listeners perceived a stationary source as moving slightly opposite to the head rotation, in much the same way that observers see stationary visual objects move against a smooth pursuit eye movement. Experiment 2 showed the degree of compensation remained the same for sounds presented at different azimuths, although the precision of performance declined when the sound was eccentric. We discuss two possible explanations for incomplete compensation, one based on differences in the accuracy of signals encoding image motion and self-movement and one concerning statistical optimization that sacrifices accuracy for precision. We then consider the degree to which such explanations can be applied to auditory motion perception in moving listeners. (PsycINFO Database Record

A Comparison of Auditory and Visual Apparent Motion Presented Individually and with Crossmodal Moving Distractors

Unimodal auditory and visual apparent motion (AM) and bimodal audiovisual AM were investigated to determine the effects of crossmodal integration on motion perception and direction-of-motion discrimination in each modality. To determine the optimal stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) ranges for motion perception and direction discrimination, we initially measured unimodal visual and auditory AMs using one of four durations (50, 100, 200, or 400 ms) and ten SOAs (40–450 ms). In the bimodal conditions, auditory and visual AM were measured in the presence of temporally synchronous, spatially displaced distractors that were either congruent (moving in the same direction) or conflicting (moving in the opposite direction) with respect to target motion. Participants reported whether continuous motion was perceived and its direction. With unimodal auditory and visual AM, motion perception was affected differently by stimulus duration and SOA in the two modalities, while the opposite was observed for direction of motion. In the bimodal audiovisual AM condition, discriminating the direction of motion was affected only in the case of an auditory target. The perceived direction of auditory but not visual AM was reduced to chance levels when the crossmodal distractor direction was conflicting. Conversely, motion perception was unaffected by the distractor direction and, in some cases, the mere presence of a distractor facilitated movement perception.

Cortical and thalamic connectivity of the auditory anterior ectosylvian cortex of early-deaf cats: Implications for neural mechanisms of crossmodal plasticity

Early hearing loss leads to crossmodal plasticity in regions of the cerebrum that are dominated by acoustical processing in hearing subjects. Until recently, little has been known of the connectional basis of this phenomenon. One region whose crossmodal properties are well-established is the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (FAES) in the cat, where neurons are normally responsive to acoustic stimulation and its deactivation leads to the behavioral loss of accurate orienting toward auditory stimuli. However, in early-deaf cats, visual responsiveness predominates in the FAES and its deactivation blocks accurate orienting behavior toward visual stimuli. For such crossmodal reorganization to occur, it has been presumed that novel inputs or increased projections from non-auditory cortical areas must be generated, or that existing non-auditory connections were 'unmasked.' These possibilities were tested using tracer injections into the FAES of adult cats deafened early in life (and hearing controls), followed by light microscopy to localize retrogradely labeled neurons. Surprisingly, the distribution of cortical and thalamic afferents to the FAES was very similar among early-deaf and hearing animals. No new visual projection sources were identified and visual cortical connections to the FAES were comparable in projection proportions. These results support an alternate theory for the connectional basis for cross-modal plasticity that involves enhanced local branching of existing projection terminals that originate in non-auditory as well as auditory cortices.

Discrimination contours for moving sounds reveal duration and distance cues dominate auditory speed perception

Evidence that the auditory system contains specialised motion detectors is mixed. Many psychophysical studies confound speed cues with distance and duration cues and present sound sources that do not appear to move in external space. Here we use the 'discrimination contours' technique to probe the probabilistic combination of speed, distance and duration for stimuli moving in a horizontal arc around the listener in virtual auditory space. The technique produces a set of motion discrimination thresholds that define a contour in the distance-duration plane for different combination of the three cues, based on a 3-interval oddity task. The orientation of the contour (typically elliptical in shape) reveals which cue or combination of cues dominates. If the auditory system contains specialised motion detectors, stimuli moving over different distances and durations but defining the same speed should be more difficult to discriminate. The resulting discrimination contours should therefore be oriented obliquely along iso-speed lines within the distance-duration plane. However, we found that over a wide range of speeds, distances and durations, the ellipses aligned with distance-duration axes and were stretched vertically, suggesting that listeners were most sensitive to duration. A second experiment showed that listeners were able to make speed judgements when distance and duration cues were degraded by noise, but that performance was worse. Our results therefore suggest that speed is not a primary cue to motion in the auditory system, but that listeners are able to use speed to make discrimination judgements when distance and duration cues are unreliable.

Functional gradients of auditory sensitivity along the anterior ectosylvian sulcus of the cat

Determining the spatial direction of sound sources is one of the major computations performed by the auditory system. The anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) of cat cortex is known to be important for sound localization. However, there are contradicting reports as to the spatial response properties of neurons in AES: whereas some studies found narrowly tuned neurons, others reported mostly spatially widely tuned neurons. We hypothesized that this is the result of a nonhomogenous distribution of the auditory neurons in this area. To test this possibility, we recorded neuronal activity along the AES, together with a sample of neurons from primary auditory cortex (A1) of cats in response to pure tones and to virtual acoustic space stimuli. In all areas, most neurons responded to both types of stimuli. Neurons located in posterior AES (pAES) showed special response properties that distinguished them from neurons in A1 and from neurons in anterior AES (aAES). The proportion of space-selective neurons among auditory neurons was significantly higher in pAES (82%) than in A1 (72%) and in aAES (60%). Furthermore, whereas the large majority of A1 neurons responded preferentially to contralateral sounds, neurons in pAES (and to a lesser extent in aAES) had their spatial selectivity distributed more homogenously. In particular, 28% of the space-selective neurons in pAES had highly modulated frontal receptive fields, against 8% in A1 and 17% in aAES. We conclude that in cats, pAES contains a secondary auditory cortical field which is specialized for spatial processing, in particular for the representation of frontal space.

Responses of cat primary auditory cortex neurons to moving stimuli with dynamically changing interaural delays

The spike responses of individual neurons in the primary auditory cortex were studied in anesthetized cats during exposure to stationary and moving stimuli with static or dynamically changing interaural delays (deltaT). Static stimuli were tones and clicks. Dynamic stimuli were created using series of synphase and antiphase clicks with interaural delays which changed over time. Sensitivity to changes in deltaT was predominantly present in neurons with low characteristic frequencies (less than 2.8 kHz). Changes in deltaT in moving stimuli induced responses in neurons sensitive to changes in deltaT in the stationary stimulus. The effect of movement could be a relationship between the level of spike activity and the direction and rate of change of deltaT or it could be a displacement of the tuning curve for the response to deltaT (the deltaT function) in the direction opposite to that of the direction of the change in deltaT. The magnitude of the effects of movement depended on the position of the period for changes in deltaT relative to the deltaT function. The greatest effects were seen with changes in deltaT on the sloping part of the deltaT function.

Thalamic projections to the auditory cortex in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi)

In this study, we analyzed the thalamic connections to the parietal or dorsal auditory cortical fields of the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi. The data of the present study were collected as part of a combined investigation of physiologic properties, neuroarchitecture, and chemoarchitecture as well as connectivity of cortical fields in Rhinolophus, in order to establish a neuroanatomically and functionally coherent view of the auditory cortex. Horseradish peroxidase or wheat-germ-agglutinated horseradish peroxidase deposits were made into cortical fields after mapping response properties. The dorsal fields of the auditory cortex span nearly the entire parietal region and comprise more than half of the non-primary auditory cortex. In contrast to the temporal fields of the auditory cortex, which receive input mainly from the ventral medial geniculate body (or "main sensory nucleus"), the dorsal fields of the auditory cortex receive strong input from the "associated nuclei" of the medial geniculate body, especially from the anterior dorsal nucleus of the medial geniculate body. The anterior dorsal nucleus is as significant for the dorsal fields of the auditory cortex as the ventral nucleus of the medial geniculate body is for the temporal fields of the auditory cortex. Additionally, the multisensory nuclei of the medial geniculate body provide a large share of the total input to the nonprimary fields of the auditory cortex. Comparing the organization of thalamic auditory cortical afferents in Rhinolophus with other species demonstrates the strong organizational similarity of this bat's auditory cortex with that of other mammals, including primates, and provides further evidence that the bat is a relevant and valuable model for studying mammalian auditory function.

Cortical Motion Deafness

The extent to which the auditory system, like the visual system, processes spatial stimulus characteristics such as location and motion in separate specialized neuronal modules or in one homogeneously distributed network is unresolved. Here we present a patient with a selective deficit for the perception and discrimination of auditory motion following resection of the right anterior temporal lobe and the right posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG). Analysis of stimulus identity and location within the auditory scene remained intact. In addition, intracranial auditory evoked potentials, recorded preoperatively, revealed motion-specific responses selectively over the resected right posterior STG, and electrical cortical stimulation of this region was experienced by the patient as incoming moving sounds. Collectively, these data present a patient with cortical motion deafness, providing evidence that cortical processing of auditory motion is performed in a specialized module within the posterior STG.

The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect

The present work investigated the temporal tuning of the auditory motion aftereffect (aMAE) by measuring the time course of adaptation and recovery to auditory motion exposure. On every trial, listeners were first exposed to a broadband, horizontally moving sound source for either 1 or 5 seconds, then presented moving test stimuli after delays of 0, 2/3, or 1 2/3 seconds. All stimuli were synthesized from head related transfer functions recorded for each participant. One second of motion exposure (i.e., a single pass of the moving source) produced clearly measurable aMAEs which generally decayed monotonically after adaptation ended, while five seconds exposure produced stronger aftereffects that remained largely unattenuated across test delays. These differences may imply two components to the aMAE: a short time-constant motion illusion and a longer time-constant response bias. Finally, aftereffects were produced only by adaptor movement toward but not away from listener midline. This aftereffect asymmetry may also be a consequence of brief adaptation times and reflect initial neural response to auditory motion in primate auditory cortex.

Invalid cues impair auditory motion sensitivity

Compelling lateral motion can be experienced when intensity differences between the two cars change over time. Whether our sensitivity to this dynamic interaural stimulation could be influenced by directional cues was the focus of the present study. On each trial, amplitude-modulated pure tones were presented either diotically (no-motion condition) or dichotically (motion condition), and participants indicated whether lateral motion was present or absent. Randomly across trials, the stimuli were preceded by a valid directional cue, an invalid directional cue, or no cue, while the motion to be detected was identical across these cue conditions. The data indicate that motion sensitivity was comparable in the valid-cue and no-cue conditions. Relative to each of those conditions, however, motion sensitivity was significantly lower in the invalid-cue condition, and motion was reported significantly less often. The results provide evidence that our sensitivity to dynamic interaural intensity differences can be significantly affected by a non-sensory factor, namely cue validity.

Encoding of sound motion by binaural brainstem units in a Horseshoe bat

In order to study how and if single brainstem units respond to moving compared with stationary sounds, radially moving sound sources were presented to the bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. This time-variant binaural stimulation was simulated dichotically through earphones (closed-acoustic-field for the virtual azimuth range of +/-40 degrees from the midline). Neurophysiologically recorded responses primarily showed a function of interaural intensity difference (IID) which is considered a direct correlate of the sound source's azimuth angle. However, this is only true for the stationary case. Unit's response did not remain unaffected by the dynamic stimulus cues of sound source movement (velocity and direction). Maximal discharge rate became a function of motion velocity as well as the slopes of the response profiles. Hence, coding of IID became ambiguous as, depending on the unit, the response profiles and therefore a unit's receptive field, became spatially shifted with respect to one another when the direction of the sound source movement was reversed. Shifts within the movement direction (hysteresis) as well as against it (termed here 'advance') were observed: hysteresis is typical for units with non-monotonic, stationary rate/intensity functions, whereas those units with monotonic functions predominantly show advances. Further dynamic response features in form of transient peaks and troughs, superimposed on the response profiles, were registered. It appears that the ongoing firing rate no longer represents azimuth position alone, but vigorously reproduces the dynamic cues (velocity and movement direction), too. With respect to the neural mechanisms leading to dynamic response features, it is proposed that, as long excitation and inhibition act with similar short time constants, neural activity can rapidly and faithfully follow changing IIDs. Different time constants for excitation, inhibition, facilitation, and depression may be responsible for the dynamic 'features' such as transient responses and hysteresis/advance. They may provide biologically relevant information for nocturnally hunting bats to efficiently guide their flight maneuvers.

Segregated processing of auditory motion and auditory location: an ERP mapping study

Recent studies have revealed a distinct cortical network activated during the analysis of sounds' spatial properties. Whether common brain regions in this auditory where pathway are involved in both auditory motion and location processing is unresolved. We investigated this question with multichannel auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in 11 subjects. Stimuli were binaural 500-ms white noise bursts. Interaural time differences (ITD) created the sensation of moving or stationary sounds within each auditory hemifield, and subjects discriminated either their position or direction of motion in a blocked design. Scalp potential distributions (AEP maps) differentiated electric field configurations across stimulus classes. The initial approximately 250-ms poststimulus yielded common topographies for both stimulus classes and hemifields. After approximately 250-ms, moving and stationary sounds engaged distinct cortical networks at two time periods, again with no differences observed between hemifields. The first ( approximately 250- to 350-ms poststimulus onset) was during stimulus presentation, and the second ( approximately 550- to 900-ms poststimulus onset) occurred after stimulus offset. Distributed linear inverse solutions of the maps over the 250- to 350-ms time period revealed not only bilateral inferior frontal activation for both types of auditory spatial processing, but also strong right inferior parietal activation in the case of auditory motion discrimination. During the later 550-to 900-ms time period, right inferior parietal and bilateral inferior frontal activity was again observed for moving sounds, whereas strong bilateral superior frontal activity was seen in the case of stationary sounds. Collectively, the evidence supports the existence of partly segregated networks within the auditory where pathway for auditory location and auditory motion processing.

Motion processing in the auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat: role of GABAergic inhibition

This study examined the influence of inhibition on motion-direction-sensitive responses of neurons in the dorsal fields of auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat. Responses to auditory apparent motion stimuli were recorded extracellularly from neurons while microiontophoretically applying gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide (BMI). Neurons could respond with a directional preference exhibiting stronger responses to one direction of motion or a shift of receptive field (RF) borders depending on direction of motion. BMI influenced the motion direction sensitivity of 53% of neurons. In 21% of neurons the motion-direction sensitivity was decreased by BMI by decreasing either directional preference or RF shift. In neurons with a directional preference, BMI increased the spike number for the preferred direction by a similar amount as for the nonpreferred direction. Thus, inhibition was not direction specific. BMI increased motion-direction sensitivity by either increasing directional preference or magnitude of RF shifts in 22% of neurons. Ten percent of neurons changed their response from a RF shift to a directional preference under BMI. In these neurons, the observed effects could often be better explained by adaptation of excitation rather than inhibition. The results suggest, that adaptation of excitation, as well as cortex specific GABAergic inhibition, contribute to motion-direction sensitivity in the auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat.

Synthesizing spatially complex sound in virtual space: an accurate offline algorithm

The study of spatial processing in the auditory system usually requires complex experimental setups, using arrays of speakers or speakers mounted on moving arms. These devices, while allowing precision in the presentation of the spatial attributes of sound, are complex, expensive and limited. Alternative approaches rely on virtual space sound delivery. In this paper, we describe a virtual space algorithm that enables accurate reconstruction of eardrum waveforms for arbitrary sound sources moving along arbitrary trajectories in space. A physical validation of the synthesis algorithm is performed by comparing waveforms recorded during real motion with waveforms synthesized by the algorithm. As a demonstration of possible applications of the algorithm, virtual motion stimuli are used to reproduce psychophysical results in humans and for studying responses of barn owls to auditory motion stimuli.

Cortical representation of acoustic motion in the rufous horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus rouxi

Responses of neurons to apparent auditory motion in the azimuth were recorded in three different fields of auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat. Motion was simulated using successive stimuli with dynamically changing interaural intensity differences presented via earphones. Seventy-one percent of sampled neurons were motion-direction-sensitive. Two types of responses could be distinguished. Thirty-four percent of neurons showed a directional preference exhibiting stronger responses to one direction of motion. Fifty-seven percent of neurons responded with a shift of spatial receptive field position depending on direction of motion. Both effects could occur in the same neuron depending on the parameters of apparent motion. Most neurons with contralateral receptive fields exhibited directional preference only with motion entering the receptive field from the opposite direction. Receptive field shifts were opposite to the direction of motion. Specific combinations of spatiotemporal parameters determined the motion-direction-sensitive responses. Velocity was not encoded as a specific parameter. Temporal parameters of motion and azimuth position of the moving sound source were differentially encoded by neurons in different fields of auditory cortex. Neurons with a directional preference in the dorsal fields can encode motion with short interpulse intervals, whereas direction-preferring neurons in the primary field can best encode motion with medium interpulse intervals. Furthermore, neurons with a directional preference in the dorsal fields are specialized for encoding motion in the midfield of azimuth, whereas direction-preferring neurons in the primary field can encode motion in lateral positions. The results suggest that motion information is differentially processed in different fields of the auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat.

Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources

OBJECTIVES

Being the two complementary cues to directional hearing, interaural time and intensity disparities (ITD and IID, respectively), are known to be separately encoded in the brain stem. We address the question as to whether their codes are collapsed into a single lateralization code subcortically or they reach the cortex via separate channels and are processed there in different areas.

METHODS

Two continuous trains of 100/s clicks were dichotically presented. At 2 s intervals either an interaural time delay of 1ms or an interaural level difference of 20 dB (HL) was introduced for 50 ms, shifting the intracranial sound image laterally for this brief period of time. Long-latency responses to these directional stimuli, which had been tested to evoke no potentials under monotic or diotic conditions, as well as to sound pips of 50 ms duration were recorded from 124 scalp electrodes. Scalp potential and current density maps at N1 latency were obtained from thirteen normal subjects. A 4-sphere head model with bilaterally symmetrical dipoles was used for source analysis and a simplex algorithm preceded by a genetic algorithm was employed for solving the inverse problem.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-subject comparisons showed that the N1 responses evoked by IID and ITD as well as by sound pip stimuli had significantly different scalp topographies and interhemispheric dominance patterns. Significant location and orientation differences between their estimated dipole sources were also noted.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that interaural time and intensity disparities (thus the lateral shifts of a sound image caused by these two cues) are processed in different ways and/or in different areas in auditory cortex.