Subsequent resection of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma following induction therapy: a systematic review of the published literature

Patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC) are traditionally treated with palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery for initially UR-PDAC following induction therapy. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published between January 2000 and October 2020. Thirty-two series involving 1270 patients with 1056 locally advanced (LA) disease and 214 distant metastases were reviewed. The median mortality and morbidity was 0% (range 0-10%) and 47.1% (range 8.6-93.3%), respectively. Lymph-node negativity, negative resection margin and pathological complete response were observed in a median of 62.9% (38.5-90.9%), 84.4% (32.8-100%) and 6.7% (0-45.8%) of the specimens. The median survival was 32 (16.4-63.9) months with a 3-year survival rate of 47% (22-80%). Meta-analysis demonstrated that conversion surgery of initially UR-PDAC was associated with a significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.45-0.66, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the group with LA disease and that with distant metastases after conversion surgery (HR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.72-1.28, P = 0.790). Conversion surgery improved long-term survival of patients with initially UR-PDAC who had favorable response to induction therapy.

Circular RNA SMARCA5 functions as an anti-tumor candidate in colon cancer by sponging microRNA-552

It was reported that circular RNA (circRNA) circSMARCA5, as a tumor-related molecule, could modulate development of cancers, including prostatic cancer and cervical cancer. Nevertheless, the essential function of circSMARCA5 in colon cancer has not yet been confirmed. We aimed to investigate the role of circSMARCA5 in colon cancer. CircSMARCA5 expression in tumor cells was detected using RT-qPCR. CCK-8, colony formation, flow cytometry and Transwell assays evaluated the influences of circSMARCA5 in colon cancer cells. RT-qPCR, prediction database and luciferase report assay were accomplished for revealing the correlation between circSMARCA5 and miR-552. After transfection with miR-552 mimic, colon cancer cell behaviors were re-evaluated. Wnt and YAP1 pathways were explored by western blot. Our data presented that circSMARCA5 was under-expressed in colon cancer tissues. Transfection with overexpressing circSMARCA5 plasmid restrained growth, migration and invasion of colon cancer cells. Besides, circSMARCA5 directly sponged to miR-552 and miR-552 up-regulation offset the effects of circSMARCA5 on SW480 and SW620 cells. Furthermore, circSMARCA5 inactivated Wnt and YAP1 pathways by inhibiting miR-552. Anti-tumor role of sircSMARCA5 was showed in colon cancer cells as sponging miR-552 and blocking Wnt and YAP1 pathways.

Automated treatment planning as a dose escalation strategy for stereotactic radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of automated stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy (SBRT-VMAT) planning using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach as a dose escalation strategy for SBRT in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Twelve patients with pancreatic cancer were retrospectively replanned. Dose prescription was 30 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) and was escalated up to 50 Gy to the boost target volume (BTV) using a SIB technique in 5 fractions. All plans were generated by Pinnacle3 Autoplanning using 6MV dual-arc VMAT technique for flattened (FF) and flattening filter-free beams (FFF). An overlap volume (OLV) between the PRV duodenum and the PTV was defined to correlate with the ability to boost the BTV. Dosimetric metrics for BTV and PTV coverage, maximal doses for serial OARs, integral dose, conformation numbers, and dose contrast indexes were used to analyze the dosimetric results. Dose accuracy was validated using the PTW Octavius-4D phantom together with the 1500 2D-array. Differences between FF and FFF plans were quantified using the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank.

RESULTS

Full prescription doses to the 95% of PTV and BTV can be delivered to patients with no OLV. BTV mean dose was >90% of the prescribed doses for all patients at all dose levels. Compared to FF plans, FFF plans showed significant reduced integral doses, larger number of MUs, and reduced beam-on-times up to 51% for the highest dose level. Despite plan complexity, pre-treatment verification reported a gamma pass-rate greater than the acceptance threshold of 95% for all FF and FFF plans for 3%-2 mm criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The SIB-SBRT strategy with Autoplanning was dosimetrically feasible. Ablative doses up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions can be delivered to the BTV for almost all patients respecting all the normal tissue constraints. A prospective clinical trial based on SBRT strategy using SIB-VMAT technique with FFF beams seems to be justified.

Radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Evolving techniques and treatment strategies

Despite ongoing efforts, patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) continue to have a dismal prognosis. Such tumors are unresectable, and optimal treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy is still not established. While chemotherapy is conventionally aimed at preventing metastatic spread of disease, radiation therapy acts locally, improving local control which can potentially improve overall survival and most importantly quality of life. Here, we aim to review the primary literature assessing the role of diverse radiation therapy strategies for patients with LAPC. Many radiation regimens can be considered, and no standard treatment has demonstrated a clear improvement in clinical outcomes. We advise that the modality of choice be dependent on the availability of equipment, the dose and fractionation of treatment, as well as the dose received by normal tissue. Moreover, a candid discussion with the patient concerning treatment goals is equally as essential. Three notable strategies for LAPC are intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and proton. These radiation modalities tend to have improved dose distribution to the target volumes, while minimizing the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues. Stereotactic body radiation therapy can also be considered in LAPC patients in cases where the tumor does not invade the duodenum or other neighboring structures. Because of the high doses delivered by stereotactic body radiation therapy, proper respiratory and tumor motion management should be implemented to reduce collateral radiation dosing. Despite improved clinical outcomes with modern radiation modalities, evolving techniques, and more accurate planning, future studies remain essential to elucidate the optimal role for radiation therapy among patients with LAPC.

Individually optimized stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic head tumors: A planning feasibility study

AIM

Aim of this study was to perform a planning feasibility analysis of a 3-level dose prescription using an IMRT-SIB technique.

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy of locally advanced pancreatic cancer should administer a minimum dose to the duodenum and a very high dose to the vascular infiltration areas to improve the possibility of a radical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and vascular involvement were included. The duodenal PTV (PTVd) was defined as the GTV overlapping the duodenal PRV. Vascular CTV (CTVv) was defined as the surface of contact or infiltration between the tumor and vessel plus a 5 mm margin. Vascular PTV (PTVv) was considered as the CTVv plus an anisotropic margin. The tumor PTV (PTVt) was defined as the GTV plus a margin including the PTVv and excluding the PTVd. The following doses were prescribed: 30 Gy (6 Gy/fraction) to PTVd, 37.5 Gy (7.5 Gy/fraction) to PTVt, and 45 Gy (9 Gy/fraction) to PTVv, respectively. Treatment was planned with an IMRT technique.

RESULTS

The primary end-point (PTVv D_mean > 90%) was achieved in all patients. PTVv D_98% > 90% was achieved in 6 patients (40%). OARs constraints were achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the PTVv D_95% > 95% objective was achieved only in 40% of patients, the study showed that in 100% of patients it was possible to administer a strongly differentiated mean/median dose. Prospective trials based on clinical application of this strategy seem to be justified in selected patients without overlap between PTVd and PTVv.

Pathology reporting of pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: challenges and uncertainties

An increasing number of studies investigate the use of neoadjuvant treatment for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. While a strong rationale supports this approach, study results are difficult to interpret and compare due to marked variance in multiple aspects of study design and performance. Divergence in pathology examination and reporting as a cause for heterogeneity and incomparability of study results has not been brought into this discussion yet, despite the fact that several key outcome measures for neoadjuvant treatment are pathology-based. This article discusses areas of controversy and difficulty regarding the evaluation of the extent of residual tumour tissue, grading of tumour regression and assessment of the margins, and explains the important clinical implications of the present uncertainty and divergence in pathology practice.

Role of adjuvant surgery in initially unresectable pancreatic cancer after long-term chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy: survival benefit?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the survival benefit and safety of adjuvant surgery in patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer following chemo(radio)therapy.

METHODS

The 130 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated during 2006 to 2013 were divided into a study group (15 patients) with planned adjuvant surgery, and a control group (115 patients with locally advanced disease) without adjuvant surgery.

RESULTS

The study group of 15 patients had shrunken tumor, decreased tumor marker, and maintained performance status after 9 months (range 5-18 months) of chemo(radio)therapy. Thirteen patients had curative resection and two patients were not resected. The remaining controls of 115 patients did not undergo surgical resection due to poor response to chemo(radio)therapy or performance status. The median survival time in the study group was better than in the control group (36 vs. 9 months, P < 0.001). The mortality and morbidity rates in the study group were 0% and 46% respectively, in spite of concomitant organ resections in 77%.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had adjuvant surgery had significant improvement of survival without increase in morbidity and mortality, relative to patients with locally advanced disease. Thus, adjuvant surgery may provide the promising results in this group who responded favorably to initial chemo(radio)therapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Role of adjuvant surgery for patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer with a long-term favorable response to non-surgical anti-cancer treatments: results of a project study for pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

PURPOSE

A multicenter survey was conducted to explore the role of adjuvant surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer with a long-term favorable response to non-surgical cancer treatments.

METHODS

Clinical data including overall survival were retrospectively compared between 58 initially unresectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent adjuvant surgery with a favorable response to non-surgical cancer treatments over 6 months after the initial treatment and 101 patients who did not undergo adjuvant surgery because of either unchanged unresectability, a poor performance status, and/or the patients' or surgeons' wishes.

RESULTS

Overall mortality and morbidity were 1.7 and 47 % in the adjuvant surgery group. The survival curve in the adjuvant surgery group was significantly better than in the control group (p < 0.0001). The propensity score analysis revealed that adjuvant surgery was a significant independent prognostic variable with an adjusted hazard ratio (95 % confidence interval) of 0.569 (0.36-0.89). Subgroup analysis according to the time from initial treatment to surgical resection showed a significant favorable difference in the overall survival in patients who underwent adjuvant surgery over 240 days after the initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer patients can be a safe and effective treatment. The overall survival rate from the initial treatment is extremely high, especially in patients who received non-surgical anti-cancer treatment for more than 240 days.

Conditionally replicative adenoviral vectors for imaging the effect of chemotherapy on pancreatic cancer cells

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis after complete macroscopic resection combined with chemotherapy. Even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, R0 resection is often not possible. Moreover, current imaging techniques cannot reliably distinguish viable cancer cells from scar tissue at the resectional margin. We investigated the use of a conditionally replicative adenovirus (CRAd), Ad5/3Cox2CRAd-ΔE3ADP-Luc, for imaging the effects of chemotherapy. The CRAd infectivity of pancreatic cancer cells was enhanced by a chimeric Ad5/3 fiber, E1A expression was under the control of the Cox2 promoter, and the luciferase gene was inserted adjacent to the adenovirus death protein (ADP) gene. Subcutaneous xenografts of the pancreatic cancer cell line MiaPaCa-2 were established in 24 BALB/c nu/nu mice. When xenografts reached a diameter of 4-6 mm (day 1), the mice were injected i.p. with either PBS (group A; n = 12) or 1000 mg/kg gemcitabine (group B; n = 12), weekly. On days 19, 26, 33, and 40, CRAd were injected intratumorally into three mice in groups A and B. Bioluminescence was imaged 72 h after CRAd injection, and gross tumor volumes were measured then tumors were removed for ex vivo histopathology using H&E and Ki-67 staining. Correlations between gross tumor volume, pathological evaluation of the percentage of viable tumor area, and CRAd bioluminescence were analyzed. Bioluminescence correlated closely with the percentage of viable tumor area (R = 0.96), but not with gross tumor volume (R = 0.31). Therefore, CRAds might be reliable imaging tools for monitoring chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer, and could improve our ability to distinguish viable tumor cells from scar tissue.

Prospective efficacy and safety study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine with capecitabine combination chemotherapy for borderline-resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/capecitabine followed by surgery for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed LAPC were given 3-6 cycles of fixed-dose rate gemcitabine/capecitabine every 3 weeks. At the end of chemotherapy, patients were restaged and underwent surgery if the disease was not classified as unresectable. Our institutional criteria were used to classify respectability, which was recategorized on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria retroactively. The primary end point was rate of microscopic curative resection.

RESULTS

Forty-three eligible patients (18 with borderline resectable disease and 25 with unresectable disease on the basis of NCCN criteria) were enrolled. The radiologic response rate was 18.6%. Grade three or worse adverse events were mainly hand-foot syndrome (11%), and there were no grade four adverse events. Surgery was performed in 17 patients (39.5%); pathologic curative resection (R0) was achieved in 14 patients (32.5%) among total 43 patients, and 82.3% (14/17) among the 17 resected patients. With 43-month follow-up, the median overall was 16.6 months with a median progression-free survival of 10.0 months. Median overall survival was 23.1 months in patients who underwent surgery and 13.2 months in patients who could not complete the surgery (P = .017).

CONCLUSION

A subset of patients with borderline or unresectable pancreatic cancer could be performed curative tumor resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Some patients might be benefit on survival from neoadjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection.

NeoGemTax: gemcitabine and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

About 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer suffer from locally advanced nonmetastatic carcinoma at the time of diagnosis. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of gemcitabine and docetaxel, to assess the rate of complete radical resection and overall survival.

METHODS

Gemcitabine (900 mg/m2) and docetaxel (35 mg/m2) were given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Two cycles were administered for a preoperative treatment duration of 8 weeks. Patients experiencing tumor regression or stable disease and improved performance status subsequently underwent surgical exploration and pancreatic resection, if feasible. All patients were followed postoperatively to assess long-term survival.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients were eligible and included in the intent-to-treat and evaluable population. Thirteen patients had unresectable disease at inclusion and 12 patients had borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Finally, 8 of 25 (32%) patients underwent resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 7 (87%) of these patients had R0 resection. The median overall survival of patients who underwent resection was 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8-24 months) compared to 12 months (95% CI, 8-16 months) for those without resection (p=0.276). The median recurrence-free survival rate after resection was 12 months (95% CI, 2-21 months).

CONCLUSIONS

NeoGemTax was safe and resection was feasible in a number of patients after systemic neoadjuvant treatment. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to identify novel multimodal regimens that would be able to increase the percentage of patients undergoing curative pancreatic cancer surgery despite advanced tumor stage at the time of diagnosis.

Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis and remains a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Most patients survive less than 1 year; chemotherapeutic options prolong life minimally. The best chance for long-term survival is complete resection, which offers a 3-year survival of only 15%. Most patients who do undergo resection will go on to die of their disease. Research in chemotherapy for metastatic disease has made only modest progress and the standard of care remains the purine analog gemcitabine. For resectable pancreatic cancer, presumed micrometastases provide the rationale for adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CRT) to supplement surgical management. Numerous randomized control trials, none definitive, of adjuvant chemotherapy and CRT have been conducted and are summarized in this review, along with recent developments in how unresectable disease can be subcategorized according to the potential for eventual curative resection. This review will also emphasize palliative care and discuss some avenues of research that show early promise.

A systematic review of resectability and survival after concurrent chemoradiation in primarily unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the effect on resection rate and survival of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for primarily unresectable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of recently published literature was performed. Resection rates and survival data were derived from reports published from 2000 onwards. Only recent studies, based on radiotherapy with standard dose and fractionation, have been analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 510 patients met selection criteria. A resection rate of 8.3-64.2% was reported (median, 26.5%). Of the operated patients, 57.1-100% (median, 87.5%) had R0 tumor resection. Most papers reported occasional pathological complete responses (CR, 3.0-8.8%). When outcome in all patients was considered, median survival ranged from 9 to 23 (median, 13.3) months, comparing favorably with literature data based on concurrent chemoradiation alone (range, 8.6-13 months). Surprisingly, in patients with unresectable tumor at presentation, median survival after surgery ranged from 16.4 to 32.3 (median, 23.6) months.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding of a high proportion of R0 resection among all resections performed confirms the activity of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and should not be neglected. Based on these data, patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer without disease progression after chemoradiotherapy should be considered for radical surgery.

Tumor cell lysate-pulsed dendritic cells induce a T cell response against colon cancer in vitro and in vivo

To investigate whether tumor cell lysate-pulsed (TP) dendritic cells (DCs) induce cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity against colon cancer in vitro and in vivo. Hematopoietic progenitor cells were magnetically isolated from BALB/c mice bone marrow cells. These cells were cultured with cytokines GM-CSF, IL-4, and TNFalpha to induce their maturation. They were analyzed by morphological observation and phenotype analysis. DCs were pulsed with tumor cell lysate obtained by rapid freezing and thawing at a 1:3 DC:tumor cell ratio. CTL activity and interferon gamma (IFNgamma) secretion was evaluated ex vivo. In order to determine whether or not vaccination with CT26 TP DCs induce the therapeutic potential in the established colon tumor model, CT26 colon tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously (s.c.) in the midflank of naïve BALB/c mice. Tumor-bearing mice were injected with vaccination with CT26 TP DCs on days 3 and 10. Tumor growth was assessed every 2-3 days. Finally, CTL activity and IFNgamma secretion were evaluated in immunized mice. Hematopoietic progenitor cells from mice bone marrow cells cultured with cytokines for 8 days showed the character of typical mature DCs. Morphologically, these cells were large with oval or irregularly shaped nuclei and with many small dendrites. Phenotypically, FACS analysis showed that they expressed high levels of MHC II, CD11b, CD80, and CD86 antigen, and were negative for CD8alpha. However, immature DCs cultured with cytokines for 5 days did not have typical DCs phenotypic markers. Ex vivo primed T cells with CT26 TP DCs were able to induce effective CTL activity against CT26 tumor cells, but not B16 tumor cells (E:T = 100:1, 60.36 +/- 7.11% specific lysis in CT26 group vs. 17.36 +/- 4.10% specific lysis in B16 group), and produced higher levels of IFNgamma when stimulated with CT26 tumor cells but not when stimulated with B16 tumor cells (1210.33 +/- 72.15 pg/ml in CT26 group vs. 182.25 +/- 25.51 pg/ml in B16 group, P < 0.01). Vaccination with CT26 TP DCs could induce anti-tumor immunity against CT26 colon tumor in murine therapeutic models (tumor volume on day 19: CT26 TP DCs 342 +/- 55 mm(3) vs. the other control groups, P < 0.05). In addition, all splenic CD3(+) T cells obtained from mice vaccinated with CT26 TP DCs produced high levels of IFNgamma and shown specific cytotoxic activity against CT26 tumor cells, but no cytotoxic activity when stimulated with B16 tumor cells. Tumor cell lysate-pulsed DCs can induce tumor-specific CTL activity against colon cancer in vitro and in vivo.

Long-term results of concurrent radiotherapy and UFT in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Definition and treatment options for locally advanced non-resectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) vary. Treatment options range from palliative chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Several studies have shown that a number of patients become resectable after complementary treatment prior to surgery.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2005, 63 consecutive patients with unresectable LAPC received CRT. CRT was given at a dose of 50 Gy/27 fractions, combined with UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day) and folinic acid. Re-evaluation of resectability was planned 4-6 weeks after completion of CRT.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients completed all 27 treatment fractions. Toxicity was generally mild, with 18 patients experiencing CTCAE grade 3 or worse acute reactions. One patient died following a treatment-related infection. Two patients developed grade 4 upper GI bleeding. Median survival was 10.6 (8-13) months. Eleven patients underwent resection, leading to a resection rate of 17%, and a median survival of 46 (23-nr) months. All 11 patients had a R0 resection. Median survival for the patients not resected was 8.8 (8-12) months.

CONCLUSION

CRT with 50 Gy combined with UFT, is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with LAPC. R0 resection was possible in 17% leading to a long median survival of 46 months in resected patients.

New directions in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a review

Complete surgical resection is the only potentially curative option for pancreatic cancer. However, most patients have advanced/metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, or will relapse after surgery. Systemic chemotherapy is only palliative. Gemcitabine-based therapy is an acceptable standard for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer, but average median survival is only 6 months. The addition of other chemotherapies (including other antimetabolites, platinum, and topoisomerase I inhibitors) or targeted therapies (farnesyl transferase inhibitors, metalloproteinase inhibitors, cetuximab and bevacizumab) to gemcitabine has failed to improve outcome. The combination of gemcitabine and erlotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor, was recently approved by the US/European authorities for use in advanced disease. In a phase III trial, the combination demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared with gemcitabine monotherapy. Positive efficacy results have also been observed in a phase III trial, favoring the addition of capecitabine to gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone. This review focuses on the recent developments in systemic treatment, and discusses how novel agents might be incorporated into future treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer.

A prolonged follow-up provides new insights into locally advanced pancreatic cancer treatment

We report the case of a 64-year-old woman treated for a locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, which could not undergo radical resection due to encasement of the superior mesenteric artery. After chemoradiotherapy (six weeks), normalization of plasma CA19.9 levels was documented and CT showed shrinkage of the pancreatic mass but persistent encasement of the SMA. Surgical exploration followed by radical resection was performed 18 months later. Resection of the pancreatic head was then performed and the final pathological analysis showed a complete response. This case is unique in terms of the duration of follow-up between chemoradiotherapy and radical resection and raises two main concerns regarding the current standard of care of locally advanced pancreatic tumors; first, the difficulty of assessing the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy, second, the unfeasibility of establishing the timing of surgery, its indications and the survival benefits for patients with an objective response to therapy.

Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer: from metastatic disease to adjuvant therapy

Pancreatic cancer remains a significant therapeutic challenge in oncology as the 21st century begins. Currently available cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents provide only a modest survival benefit for patients with advanced disease. Recent efforts to improve survival in the setting of locally advanced and metastatic disease have focused on combinations of cytotoxic agents and the integration of newer molecular agents. To date, these strategies have been somewhat disappointing, prompting some experts to consider changes in clinical trial design with more rigorous patient eligibility criteria. In the adjuvant therapy setting, investigation of newer agents has lagged behind studies in more advanced disease, but recent results suggested some evidence of incremental advance. However, just as in advanced pancreatic cancer, without a more disciplined approach to patient selection for surgical intervention and subsequent adjuvant therapy, progress can be expected to remain very slow. This review will provide a brief summary of the history of chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer and focus on its current and future role in adjuvant therapy.

Chemotherapy as initial treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: a valid option?

INTRODUCTION

Radio-chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in the treatment of metastatic disease and we therefore evaluated its use as a first-line treatment for LAPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients treated for LAPC (N=33) between July 1997 and April 2005, analysing the results of first-line chemotherapy (CT group) and radio-chemotherapy (RCT group) in this setting.

RESULTS

The first-line treatment was RCT in six patients (18.3%) and CT in 26 patients (78.8%). Secondary treatment was administered to nine patients of CT group with well-controlled disease: "closure" radio-chemotherapy for seven patients (26.9%) and secondary resection for three (12%). After a median follow-up of 27 months, 23 patients died (69.7%). Overall survival was 13.8 months [95% CI: 10.1-19.4] for the whole population, 9.5 months [95% CI: 4.6-] for the RCT and 18.0 months [95% CI: 12.4-25.5] for the CT. Overall survival for the CT patients undergoing secondary surgery or "consolidation" radio-chemotherapy was 28.8 months [95% CI: 13.8-].

CONCLUSION

First-line chemotherapy is a valid option for LAPC treatment, making it possible to identify the patients who may benefit from secondary resection or radio-chemotherapy.