Quels changements dans le Thésaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive en 2005 ?

The Clinical Outcome in Patients Treated With a Newly Designed SEMS in Cervical Esophageal Strictures and Fistulas

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Using a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) in the cervical esophagus is controversial due to an increased risk of complications. Here we assessed a new type of SEMS purpose-designed for the cervical esophagus area.

STUDY

Patients with malignant or benign stenosis within 4 cm distance of the upper esophageal sphincter who underwent placement of a SEMS with a shorter proximal head (Niti-S Esophageal Covered Stent-Cervical-type, NSECSC), were included. Main outcome measures were the functional outcome, tolerance, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival.

RESULTS

About 37 patients had an NSECSC placed between April 2008 and June 2013 for esophageal stenosis (malignant=20, benign=17), 5 with associated tracheoesophageal fistula. The mean stenosis-upper esophageal sphincter distance was 1.86±1.27 cm. The median follow-up was 150 days. Dysphagia improved in 27/37 cases (73%). Short-term and long-term tolerance without needing stent removal was 92% and 82%, respectively. The complication rate was 59% (22/37): 32% (n=14) major complications [fistula (3), perforation (3), aspiration pneumonia (5), laryngeal dyspnea (2), and bleeding (1)], and 27% (n=10) minor complications [pain (7) or dysphonia (3)]. A multivariate analysis confirmed a higher risk of major complications in cases of benign stenosis (odds ratio=5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-25.90; P=0.04). Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 15 patients (obstruction=7, migration=8).

CONCLUSIONS

The NSECSC does not appear less morbid than standard SEMS in the cervical esophageal area, but could be useful in malignant indications as it is well-tolerated and offers effective palliation of the dysphagia. However, this device should not be used in benign cervical esophageal strictures or fistulas.

Efficacy of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (MGA) treatment

OBJECTIVES

The most commonly used schedules are 5-FU in combination with CDDP with or without epirubicin (ECF) or docetaxel (TCF) in treatment of MGA patients (pts), independently of HER status. We evaluated the efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen in a large retrospective series of MGA pts.

METHODS

Two hundred and twelve pts from 13 French centers were treated with at least one cycle of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) over 90 minutes on day 1 with folinic acid (FA) 400mg/m2 i.v. over two hours followed by 5-FU 400mg/m2 i.v. bolus then 5- FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours on day 1, repeated every 14 days). Primary tumour sites were 120 (58%) stomach and 92 (42%) gastroesophageal junction. FOLFIRI was administered as first-line in 137 (65%) pts and as later-line in 75 (35%) pts for MGA.

RESULTS

There was no difference between chemonaive and not chemonaive pts treated as firstline in terms of response rate 37% (95% CI: 25-50) vs 44% (95% CI: 21-69), median PFS, 6.7 (95% CI: 5.5-9.9) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.9) (P = 0.25), and OS, 13.1 (95% CI: 11.7-18.7) vs 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.3—15.6) (P = 0.19), respectively. There was no difference between pts treated as second or later-line in terms of response rate 20% (95% CI: 8-39) vs 22% (95% CI: 6-48), median PFS, four months (95% CI: 2.8-5.4) vs 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.5) (P = 0.56), and OS, 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.4-14.4) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-11.3) (P = 0.58), respectively. The global grade 3-4 toxicities were: diarrhea 11%, vomiting 9%, neutropenia 18%, febril neutropenia 4% (one toxic death).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study confirms the activity and good tolerance of FOLFIRI regimen in MGA as first-line as well as later-line.