1
|
Rao S, Anandappa G, Capdevila J, Dahan L, Evesque L, Kim S, Saunders MP, Gilbert DC, Jensen LH, Samalin E, Spindler KL, Tamberi S, Demols A, Guren MG, Arnold D, Fakih M, Kayyal T, Cornfeld M, Tian C, Catlett M, Smith M, Spano JP. A phase II study of retifanlimab (INCMGA00012) in patients with squamous carcinoma of the anal canal who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy (POD1UM-202). ESMO Open 2022; 7:100529. [PMID: 35816951 PMCID: PMC9463376 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Locally advanced or metastatic squamous carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) has poor prognosis following platinum-based chemotherapy. Retifanlimab (INCMGA00012), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death protein-1 (PD-1), demonstrated clinical activity across a range of solid tumors in clinical trials. We present results from POD1UM-202 (NCT03597295), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating retifanlimab in patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic SCAC. Patients and methods Patients ≥18 years of age had measurable disease and had progressed following, or were ineligible for, platinum-based therapy. Retifanlimab 500 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent central review. Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Overall, 94 patients were enrolled. At a median follow-up of 7.1 months (range, 0.9-19.4 months), ORR was 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.6% to 22.5%], with one complete response (1.1%) and 12 partial responses (12.8%). Responses were observed regardless of human immunodeficiency virus or human papillomavirus status, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, or liver metastases. Stable disease was observed in 33 patients (35.1%) for a DCR of 48.9% (95% CI 38.5% to 59.5%). Median DOR was 9.5 months (range, 5.6 months-not estimable). Median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 2.3 (1.9-3.6) and 10.1 (7.9-not estimable) months, respectively. Retifanlimab safety in this population was consistent with previous experience for the PD-(L)1 inhibitor class. Conclusions Retifanlimab demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic SCAC who have progressed on or are intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Retifanlimab (PD-1 inhibitor) monotherapy demonstrated encouraging results in patients with platinum-refractory SCAC. Clinically meaningful antitumor activity was reported with ORR of 13.8% and stable disease in 35.1%, for a DCR of 48.9%. Observed responses in advanced SCAC were durable (median 9.5 months). Acceptable safety profile consistent with that reported for the PD-(L)1 inhibitor class. Promising results warrant further investigation of retifanlimab in advanced SCAC as well as earlier stages of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rao
- The Royal Marsden, London, UK.
| | | | - J Capdevila
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Teknon-IOB, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Dahan
- Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - L Evesque
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - S Kim
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | | | - D C Gilbert
- Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - L H Jensen
- University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - E Samalin
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | | | - S Tamberi
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, AUSL Romagna Oncology Unit Faenza Hospital (RA), Faenza, Italy
| | - A Demols
- Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Anderlecht, Belgium
| | - M G Guren
- Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Fakih
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, USA
| | - T Kayyal
- Renovatio Clinical, Houston, USA
| | | | - C Tian
- Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, USA
| | | | - M Smith
- Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, USA
| | - J-P Spano
- APHP-Sorbonne University-IUC, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de la Fouchardiere C, Decoster L, Samalin E, Terret C, Kenis C, Droz JP, Coutzac C, Smyth E. Advanced oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma in older patients in the era of immunotherapy. A review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 100:102289. [PMID: 34583303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Gastric (G) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas are of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide and affect mainly patients over 70 years at diagnosis. Older age has been associated in gastric cancers with distal tumour location, well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and microsatellite instability and is not identified itself as an independent prognostic factor. As immune checkpoint inhibitors recently changed the landmark of advanced G and GEJ adenocarcinomas treatment, we decided to perform a literature review to define the evidence-level of clinical data in older patients. This work underlined the lasting low -inclusion rate of older patients and -implementation rate of frailty screening tools in clinical trials in G/GEJ carcinomas. In the first-line metastatic setting, two prospective randomized phase III studies have specifically assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with HER2-negative gastric cancers, demonstrating the feasibility of reduced dose oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in this population. Only few data are available in HER2-positive tumors, or in the second-line setting. Furthermore, no specific trial with immune checkpoint inhibitors was performed in older frail patients whereas their benefit/adverse events ratio make them attractive candidates in this patient's population. We conclude that older fit patients can be treated in the same way as younger ones and included in clinical trials. Improving the outcome of older frail patients should be the oncology community next focus by implementing targeted interventions before initiating cancer therapy and designing specific clinical trials. Frailty screening tools and geriatric data collection have to be implemented in routine-practice and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - L Decoster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - E Samalin
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - C Terret
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France
| | - C Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - J P Droz
- Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon1 University, Lyon, France.
| | - C Coutzac
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, Lyon, France.
| | - E Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim S, Meurisse A, Stouvenot M, Jary M, Hon TNT, Francois E, Buecher B, Andre T, Samalin E, Boulbair F, De Bari B, Almotlak H, Klajer E, Calcagno F, Chatillon E, Spehner L, Jacquin M, Vendrely V, Vernerey D, Borg C. Updated data of epitopes-HPV02 trial and external validation of efficacy of DCF in prospective epitopes-HPV01 study in advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma. Pooled analysis of 115 patients. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
4
|
Ouali K, Cohen R, Turpin A, Neuzillet C, Rousseau B, Garcia-Larnicol ML, Tournigand C, Samalin E, Taieb J, André T. Impact of the IDEA study on clinical practice for stage III colon cancer patients: A French GERCOR - FFCD - GI UNICANCER national survey. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Guimbaud R, Quero L, Vendrely V, Tougeron D, Benerezy K, Samalin E, Aparicio T, Zitvogel L, Selves J, Otal P, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E, Delord JP, Pezzella V, Filleron T, Modesto A. PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of radiochemotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable oesophageal cancer: A comparative randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz247.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
6
|
Samalin E, Turpin A, Khemissa F, Zaanan A, Benabdelghani M, Senellart H, Gilabert M, Evesque L, Dahan L, Sefrioui D, Bouché O, De la Fouchardière C, Hennequin A, Monard L, Gourgou S, Lopez A. Regorafenib combined with irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas: A randomized phase 2 trial (PRODIGE 58 – UCGI 35 – REGIRI). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz155.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
7
|
Samalin E, Mazard T, Assenat E, Rouyer M, De la Fouchardière C, Guimbaud R, Smith D, Portales F, Ychou M, Fiess C, de Forges H, Lopez-Crapez E, Thézenas S. Triplet chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz155.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
8
|
Touchefeu Y, Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Dahan L, Samalin E, Barbier E, Le Malicot K, Cohen R, Gornet JM, Aparicio T, Nguyen S, Azzedine A, Etienne PL, Phelip JM, Hammel P, Chapelle N, Sefrioui D, Mineur L, Lepage C, Bouche O. Prognostic factors in patients treated with second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: results from the randomized prospective phase III FFCD-0307 trial. Gastric Cancer 2019; 22:577-586. [PMID: 30311042 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors in patients treated with second-line therapy (L2) for locally advanced or metastatic gastric and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma in a randomized phase III study with predefined L2. METHODS In the FFCD-0307 study, patients were randomly assigned to receive in L1 either epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX arm) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI arm). L2 treatment was predefined (FOLFIRI for the ECX arm and ECX for the FOLFIRI arm). Chi square tests were used to compare the characteristics of patients treated in L2 with those of patients who did not receive L2. Prognostic factors in L2 for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Cox model. RESULTS Among 416 patients included, 101/209 (48.3%) patients in the ECX arm received FOLFIRI in L2, and 81/207 (39.1%) patients in the FOLFIRI arm received ECX in L2. Patients treated in L2, compared with those who only received L1 had : a better ECOG score (0-1: 90.4% versus 79.7%; p = 0.0002), more frequent GEJ localization (40.8% versus 27.6%; p = 0.005), and lower platelet count (median: 298000 versus 335000/mm3; p = 0.02). In multivariate analyses, age < 60 years at diagnosis (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.09-2.03, p = 0.013) and ECOG score 2 before L2 (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.41-4.84, p = 0.005) were the only significant poor prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION Age ≥ 60 years at diagnosis and ECOG score 0/1 before L2 were the only favorable prognostic factors for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Touchefeu
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Unit, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France.
| | - R Guimbaud
- Digestive Medical Oncology IUCT Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - C Louvet
- Oncology Multidisciplinary Research Group (GERCOR), 151 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75011, Paris, France
| | - L Dahan
- Digestive Oncology Unit, AP-HM, La Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - E Samalin
- Digestive Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - E Barbier
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive-EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - K Le Malicot
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive-EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - R Cohen
- Department of Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Antoine, 75012, Paris, France
| | - J M Gornet
- Department of Gastroenterology, AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - T Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, University Denis Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - S Nguyen
- Oncology Multidisciplinary Research Group (GERCOR), 151 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75011, Paris, France
| | - A Azzedine
- Department of oncology, CH Montélimar, Montélimar, France
| | - P L Etienne
- Oncology Department, CARIO, HPCA, Plérin, France
| | - J M Phelip
- Service HGE et Oncologie Digestive, CHU de Saint Etienne, Unité HESPER EA-7425 Université Jean Monnet/Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France
| | - P Hammel
- Digestive Oncology Unit, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - N Chapelle
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Unit, Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, University Hospital, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France
| | - D Sefrioui
- Digestive Oncology Unit, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Rouen University Hospital, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, IRON group, Normandie University, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - L Mineur
- Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - C Lepage
- Gastroenterology Department, INSERM UMR1231, CHU de Dijon, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - O Bouche
- Digestive Oncology, CHU REIMS, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adenis A, Bennouna J, Etienne P, Bogart E, Francois E, Galais M, Ben Abdelghani M, Michel P, Metges J, Dahan L, Conroy T, Ghiringhelli F, Drouillard A, El Hajbi F, Samalin E, Hiret S, Delaine-Clisant S, Mariette C, Penel N, Piessen G, Le Deley M. Continuation versus discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic squamous cell oesophageal cancer: A randomised phase II trial (E-DIS). Eur J Cancer 2019; 111:12-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Bernard-Tessier A, Jeannot E, Guenat D, Michel M, Proudhon C, Vincent-Salomon A, Bièche I, Pierga JY, Buecher B, Francois E, Kim S, André T, Jary M, Vendrely V, Samalin E, El Hajbi F, Baba-Hamed N, Meurisse A, Bidard FC, Borg C. HPV circulating tumor DNA as predictive biomarker of sustained response to chemotherapy in advanced anal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy269.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Zaanan A, Samalin E, Louvet C, Montérymard C, Khemissa F, Bouche O, Louafi S, Ghiringhelli F, Bernard P, Chibaudel B, Artru P, Molin Y, Baba-Hamed N, Romano O, Aparicio T, Michel P, Rougier P, Tougeron D, Manfredi S, Taieb J. PRODIGE 51 - GASTFOX: Phase III randomised trial evaluating FOLFOX with or without DOCETAXEL (TFOX) as 1st line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx369.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Kim S, Francois E, Bidard FC, Samalin E, El Hajbi F, Baba-Hamed N, Dumont S, Pernot S, Peiffert D, Ghiringhelli F, Bouche O, Desrame J, Zoubir M, Parzy A, Smith D, de la Fouchardiere C, Buecher B, Vendrely V, Bonnetain F, Borg C. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable locally recurrent anal squamous cell carcinoma: A phase II study of French interdisciplinary GERCOR and FFCD Groups (Epitopes-HPV02 study). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx393.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
13
|
Samalin E, Senellart H, Thezenas S, Jacquot S, Ellis S, Khemissa F, Ramdani M, Portales F, Assenat E, Mazard T, Mineur L, Ychou M. Multicenter randomized phase II trial (BEVATOMOX) assessing the raltitrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab combination versus FOLFOX6 bevacizumab as 2nd line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx393.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
14
|
Assenat E, Fouchardiere C, Mollevi C, Samalin E, Portales F, Desseigne F, Carenco C, Dupuy M, Lopez-Martinez E, Fiess C, Mazard T, Ychou M. Gabrinox: A phase I-II of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by folfirinox in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw371.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
15
|
Samalin E, Fouchardiere C, Thezenas S, Boige V, Senellart H, Guimbaud R, Taieb J, Francois E, Galais MP, Adenis A, Lievre A, Dahan L, Di Fiore F, Boissiere F, Crapez E, Bibeau F, Ho-Pun-Cheung A, Poujol S, Mazard T, Ychou M. Sorafenib (Soraf) and irinotecan (Iri) combination for pretreated RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients: a multicentre randomized phase II trial (NEXIRI 2-PRODIGE 27). Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw370.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Bennouna J, Etienne PL, Bogart E, Galais MP, Benabdelghani M, Francois E, Michel P, Dahan L, Metges JP, Ghiringhelli F, Conroy T, Kotecki N, Bedenne L, El Hajbi F, Samalin E, Piessen G, Delaine-Clisant S, Penel N, Mariette C, Adenis A. LBA-04 The E-DIS study, a randomized discontinuation trial of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic squamous-cell esophageal cancer (MSEC): efficacy and quality of life results. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw237.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
17
|
Bennouna J, Etienne PL, Bogart E, Galais MP, Benabdelghani M, Francois E, Michel P, Dahan L, Metges JP, Ghiringhelli F, Conroy T, Kotecki N, Bedenne L, El Hajbi F, Samalin E, Piessen G, Delaine-Clisant S, Penel N, Mariette C, Adenis A. LBA-04The E-DIS study, a randomized discontinuation trial of first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic squamous-cell esophageal cancer (MSEC): efficacy and quality of life results. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw237.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
18
|
Samalin E, Thezenas S, Delord JP, Italiano A, Smith D, Portales F, Mazard T, Assenat E, Poujol S, Solassol I, Khier S, Chalbos P, Ychou M. P-161 A phase I-trial assessing several schedules of Oral S-1 combined with fixed doses of Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in patients with advanced or metastatic digestive adenocarcinoma as first- or second-line treatment. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv233.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
19
|
Assenat E, Delord JP, Thézenas S, Samalin E, Portales F, Sari C, Thirion A, Guimboaud R, Ychou M. P-158 (BREGO) Regorafenib combined with modified (m) GEMOX (Gemcitabine- Oxaliplatin) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): a phase Ib/II randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv233.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
20
|
Reguiai Z, Bachet JB, Bachmeyer C, Peuvrel L, Beylot-Barry M, Bezier M, Boucher E, Chevelle C, Colin P, Guimbaud R, Mineur L, Richard MA, Artru P, Dufour P, Gornet JM, Samalin E, Bensadoun RJ, Ychou M, André T, Dreno B, Bouché O. Management of cutaneous adverse events induced by anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor): a French interdisciplinary therapeutic algorithm. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20:1395-404. [PMID: 22539049 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1451-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2011] [Accepted: 03/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cutaneous adverse events induced by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors can hamper the patients' quality of life. The aim of our work was to draft an algorithm for the optimised management of this skin toxicity. METHODS This algorithm was built in three steps under the responsibility of a steering committee. Step I: a systematic literature analysis (SLA) has been performed. Step II: the collection of information about practices was performed through a questionnaire.These questions were asked during regional meetings to which oncologists, gastro-enterologists, radiotherapists, and dermatologists were invited. Step III: a final meeting was organised involving the bibliography group and the steering committee and regional scientific committees for proposing a final algorithm. RESULTS Step I: 14 publications were selected to evaluate the use of cyclines as curative or prophylactic treatment of the folliculitis induced by EGFR inhibitors. Nineteen publications were retained for the topical treatment of the folliculitis. Forty-six articles were selected for the management of the cutaneous lesions in link with appendages and 12 for xerosis and pruritus. Step II: 96 delegates attended the seven regional meetings and 67 questionnaires were analysed. Step III: a final algorithm was proposed on the basis of the conclusions of the first two steps and expert opinions present at this final meeting. The different propositions were unanimously approved by the 14 experts who voted. CONCLUSIONS This multidisciplinary study summarising published data and current practices produced a therapeutic algorithm, which should facilitate the standardised, optimised management of skin toxicity associated with EGFR inhibitors in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Reguiai
- Department of Dermatology, CHU Reims, Hôpital Robert Debré, avenue du Général Koenig, 51092 Reims, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mazard T, Ychou M, Thezenas S, Poujol S, Pinguet F, Thirion A, Bleuse JP, Portales F, Samalin E, Assenat E. Feasibility of biweekly combination chemotherapy with capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic solid tumors: results of a two-step phase I trial: XELIRI and XELIRINOX. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2011; 69:807-14. [PMID: 22037922 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-011-1764-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2011] [Accepted: 10/12/2011] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biweekly schedule of capecitabine combined with irinotecan (XELIRI), consecutively with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (XELIRINOX), was evaluated in patients with metastatic cancer from any solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this two-step phase I trial, seventeen and eleven patients were enrolled in the XELIRI and XELIRINOX stages, respectively. RESULTS In XELIRI, a total of 136 chemotherapy cycles were administered with a median number of 8 cycles per patient (2-16). Main dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were grade 3-4 neutropenia, with one toxicity-related death. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for capecitabine combined with 180 mg/m(2) of irinotecan was 3,500 mg/m(2)/day. In XELIRINOX, capecitabine starting dose was 2,500 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-eight chemotherapy cycles were administered with a median of 4 cycles per patient (1-16). DLT included 3 grade 4 neutropenia, associated with 1 grade 3 diarrhea, and 1 grade 4 pneumopathy leading to patient death. MTD for capecitabine with 180 mg/m(2) of irinotecan and 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin was 3,000 mg/m(2)/day. The recommended doses for capecitabine were 3,000 and 2,500 mg/m(2)/day D1-D7 in combination with 180 mg/m(2) of irinotecan in XELIRI, plus 85 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin in XELIRINOX (D1 = D14), respectively. CONCLUSION XELIRI and XELIRINOX regimens are feasible and warrant further investigation in combination with targeted therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Mazard
- Département d'Oncologie Médicale, CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Samalin E, Bouche O, Thezenas S, Frangois E, Adenis A, Bennouna J, Taieb J, Desseigne F, Laurent-Puig P, Ychou M. 6091 POSTER Final Results of a Multicentre Phase II Trial Assessing Sorafenib in Combination With Irinotecan as 2nd or Later-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients With KRas Mutated Tumours (mt) (NEXIRI). Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71736-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
23
|
Ychou M, Bouche O, Thézenas S, Francois E, Adenis A, Bennouna J, Taïeb J, Desseigne F, Seitz J, Conroy T, Galais M, Crapez E, Poujol S, Bibeau F, Laurent-Puig P, Samalin E. Final results of a multicenter phase II trial assessing sorafenib (S) in combination with irinotecan (i) as second- or later-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with KRAS-mutated tumors (mt; NEXIRI). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e14002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
24
|
Portales F, Thézenas S, Samalin E, Assenat E, Senesse P, Ychou M. Incidence and management of bone metastases digestive cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e14110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
25
|
Samalin E, Afchain P, Thézenas S, Abbas F, Romano O, Guimbaud R, Bécouarn Y, Desseigne F, Edeline J, Mitry E, Bouché O, Adenis A, Aparicio T, Dorval E, Kramar A, Ychou M. Efficacy of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (MGA) treatment. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2011; 35:48-54. [PMID: 21634054 DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The most commonly used schedules are 5-FU in combination with CDDP with or without epirubicin (ECF) or docetaxel (TCF) in treatment of MGA patients (pts), independently of HER status. We evaluated the efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen in a large retrospective series of MGA pts. METHODS Two hundred and twelve pts from 13 French centers were treated with at least one cycle of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) over 90 minutes on day 1 with folinic acid (FA) 400mg/m2 i.v. over two hours followed by 5-FU 400mg/m2 i.v. bolus then 5- FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours on day 1, repeated every 14 days). Primary tumour sites were 120 (58%) stomach and 92 (42%) gastroesophageal junction. FOLFIRI was administered as first-line in 137 (65%) pts and as later-line in 75 (35%) pts for MGA. RESULTS There was no difference between chemonaive and not chemonaive pts treated as firstline in terms of response rate 37% (95% CI: 25-50) vs 44% (95% CI: 21-69), median PFS, 6.7 (95% CI: 5.5-9.9) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-6.9) (P = 0.25), and OS, 13.1 (95% CI: 11.7-18.7) vs 8.8 months (95% CI: 7.3—15.6) (P = 0.19), respectively. There was no difference between pts treated as second or later-line in terms of response rate 20% (95% CI: 8-39) vs 22% (95% CI: 6-48), median PFS, four months (95% CI: 2.8-5.4) vs 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.5) (P = 0.56), and OS, 10.4 months (95% CI: 5.4-14.4) vs 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-11.3) (P = 0.58), respectively. The global grade 3-4 toxicities were: diarrhea 11%, vomiting 9%, neutropenia 18%, febril neutropenia 4% (one toxic death). CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study confirms the activity and good tolerance of FOLFIRI regimen in MGA as first-line as well as later-line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Samalin
- CRLC Val d'Aurelle, 208, rue des Apothicaires, 34298 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ychou M, François E, Thézenas S, Laurent-Puig P, Bouche O, Adenis A, Bennouna J, Assenat E, Portales F, Samalin E. Sorafenib (S) in combination with irinotecan (I) as a treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with KRAS mutation (mt) as second line or later: Interim analysis results of multicenter phase II part trial (NEXIRI). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e14022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
27
|
Guimbaud R, Bouché O, Rebischung C, Bonnetain F, Louvet C, Viret F, André T, Samalin E, Gorent J, Dutel J, Bedenne L. Planned interim analysis of the intergroup FFCD-GERCOR-FNCLCC-AERO phase III study comparing two sequences of chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancers. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4533 Background: There are several standard chemotherapies in locally advanced or metastatic gastric or cardia adenocarcinoma, including ECF. Methods: Patients (pts) with a gastric or cardiac adenocarcinoma, locally advanced or metastatic, not surgically curable, with a WHO PS ≤2 and evaluable or measurable lesions, were randomized (1:1) according to the following sequences: ECC (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 D1+ cisplatin 60 mg/m2 D1 + capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 D2 to D15, every 3 weeks) in 1st line, then FOLFIRI (IRI 180 mg/m2 D1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 D1, bolus 5FU 400 mg/m2 D1 and continuous 5FU 2400 mg/m2 in 46h, every 2 weeks) in 2nd line (Arm A) vs the reverse sequence (Arm B) with a stratification for center, PS, adjuvant treatment, site, linitis and measurable disease. To show an improvement in median time to treatment failure for the 1st line (TTF: time between randomization and progression, or treatment discontinuation or recurrence or death) of 15 to 20 weeks for arm B (α bilateral 5%; β 20 %), 381 failures and 416 pts are required in 4-year period. An interim analysis is planned when at least 190 failures are observed (ITT). TTF is estimated according to the Kaplan Meier method and compared with a Log-rank test. Results: In arm A and B, 174 and 175 pts were included respectively, between 17/06/05 and 21/12/07. Pts characteristics are: PS 1: 51%, med. age 60 years, gastric 67%, M+ 88%, resected primary tumor 27% and linitis 23%. In arms A and B respectively, 141 and 147 pts received at least one dose in 1st line and 61 and 44 pts in 2nd line. Toxicities during the first line is more frequent in the ECC than in the FOLFIRI arm: grade 3/4 (88 vs 68% - p ≤0.0001) and grade 3/4 hemato toxicities (69 vs 36% - p ≤0.001). In 2nd line, toxicities frequency is not different in both arms. The median TTF in 1st line (n = 310 pts) is 4.7 months [3.8 - 5.7] for ECC and 5.2 months [4.4–6.0] for FOLFIRI (Log Rank p = 0. 78). Regarding the 252 failures observed (67% of the required events), the significance level to reject H0 is p = 0.012 (EAST V5). Conclusions: It is not possible yet to conclude to the superiority of FOLFIRI in 1st line; the final analysis after observation of 381 failures is required. Regarding toxicity, hemato-toxicity is more frequent with ECC in 1st line. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Guimbaud
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - O. Bouché
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - C. Rebischung
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - F. Bonnetain
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - C. Louvet
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - F. Viret
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - T. André
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - E. Samalin
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - J. Gorent
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - J. Dutel
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| | - L. Bedenne
- CHU, Toulouse, France; CHU, Reims, France; CHU, Grenoble, France; FFCD, Dijon, France; CHU St Antoine, Paris, France; CLCC Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France; CHU Tenon, Paris, France; CLCC Val d’Aurelle, Montpellier, France; CHU St Louis, Paris, France; CHG, Beauvais, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Assenat E, Kramar A, Poujol S, Gestin-Boyer C, Senesse P, Samalin E, Portales F, Thezenas S, Bleuse J, Ychou M. A phase I trial of a bi-weekly combination of capecitabine/irinotecan (XELIRI) then capecitabine/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (XELIRINOX) in solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15075 Background: Oral fluoropyrimidines, notably capecitabine, are increasingly replacing IV 5-FU/LV as the backbone of therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The bi-weekly combination of capecitabine/irinotecan warrants further examination. Methods: We conducted a phase I trial, in metastatic cancer patients treated for solid tumors, to determine the recommended dose of capecitabine administered orally bid from day 1 to 8 in combination with a bi-weekly fixed-dose of IV irinotecan 180 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and 14 (FIRST STAGE: XELIRI); and + a bi-weekly fixed-dose of IV oxaliplatin (L-OHP) 85 mg/m2 delivered on day 1 and 14 (Second STAGE: XELIRINOX). Five increasing dose levels (DL1–5) of capecitabine were planned: 1000, 1250, 1500, 1750, and 2000 mg/m2 bid. A pharmacokinetic study of this association was performed. Results: In the first stage, a total of 17 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 (range 52–73) years. All patients had an ECOG PS of either 0 (59%), 1 (35%), or 2 (6%). Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity: 2 developed grade 4 neutropenia (at DL 1 and 4) and 2 others grade 4 febrile neutropenia (at DL3 and 4). One toxicity-related death occurred following febrile neutropenia (DL4). Maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was DL4, and the recommended dose regimen was bi-weekly irinotecan 180 mg/m2 combined with capecitabine 1500 mg/m2 bid (administered from days 1 to 8). In the second stage, the starting dose level of capecitabine in the bi- weekly association with irinotecan and L-OHP was defined as two dose levels below the MTD level reached in the first stage of the study (DL4 - 2 = DL2). Height patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 (35–75) and ECOG 0 for 62%, ECOG 1 for 38%. Chemotherapy is ongoing for three of them. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity: 1 grade 4 neutropenia ( DL2), 1 grade 4 febrile neutropenia ( DL3) and 1 grade 4 pneumopathy ( DL3). The MTD of XELIRINOX was DL3, and the recommended dose regimen will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Bi-weekly combination of capecitabine/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (XELIRI / XELIRINOX) is feasible and could be tested in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in combination with a targeted therapy. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Assenat
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - A. Kramar
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - S. Poujol
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | | | - P. Senesse
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - E. Samalin
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - F. Portales
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - S. Thezenas
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - J. Bleuse
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - M. Ychou
- Val D’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kanyinda-K JM, Samalin E, Sebah H, Gallix B, Ychou M. [Efficacy of prolonged-release somatostatin analog monotherapy in metastatic endocrine tumors]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2008; 32:989-991. [PMID: 18945567 DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2008] [Revised: 08/05/2008] [Accepted: 09/05/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
|
30
|
Assenat E, Kramar A, Senesse P, Samalin E, Portales F, Ychou M. A phase I trial of a bi-weekly combination of capecitabine/irinotecan (XELIRI) in solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.13556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
31
|
Afchain P, Samalin E, Thezenas S, Abbas F, Romano O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Desseigne F, Mitry E, Ychou M. Efficacy of irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) in metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (MGA). J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.15539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Samalin E, Ychou M. Le point sur les traitements adjuvants et néoadjuvants des adénocarcinomes œsogastriques. ONCOLOGIE 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-008-0845-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
33
|
Lièvre A, Samalin E, Senesse P, Boyer-Gestin C, Mitry E, Lepère C, Bachet J, Vaillant J, Ychou M, Rougier P. Efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin as second-line, third-line or later treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.14558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
14558 Introduction: Bevacizumab (Bev) is efficient in MCRC patients (pts) as first-line treatment (L1) with 5FU±irinotecan, and with FOLFOX as second-line (L2). It has no efficacy in 3rd or later-line, alone or with 5FU. In Europe, Bev was approved by the EMEA (European Medicines Evaluation Agency) in 2005 and many patients could not received it in L1 before this date. This study evaluated the efficacy of Bev combined to polychemotherapy (CT) in L2, L3 or later-line in CT refractory pts. Methods: Between May 2005 and October 2006, 38 pts (median age: 54.5 years, range:25–82) received Bev combined with CT as L2 (n=18), L3 (n=6), L4 (n=7), L5 or later-line (n=7). Tumor response (OR) was assessed according to RECIST criteria by CT-scan. Results: Tumor sites: 28 colon and 10 rectum. Number of metastatic sites were 1, 2 and more in 16, 13 and 9 cases, mostly hepatic (89%) or pulmonary (42%). Bev (5mg/kg/2weeks) was combined with FOLFIRI (n=24) or FOLFOX (n=14); 299 cycles were administered, mean: 7.9 cycles/pt (range:2–14). OR rate was 42,1%, stabilization 42,1% and was not different according to the line or the CT regimen (table). Initial progressions were rare. Tolerance was acceptable (no perforation and no severe Hypertension). Conclusion: This study reports a significant activity of Bev at the dose of 5mg/kg combined with FOLFOX and/or FOLFIRI in CT refractory pts. These results warrant prospective studies of Bev combined with active CT in CT refractory pts who could not received Bev in the setting of the EMEA authorization. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Lièvre
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - E. Samalin
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - P. Senesse
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - C. Boyer-Gestin
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - E. Mitry
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - C. Lepère
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - J. Bachet
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - J. Vaillant
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - M. Ychou
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - P. Rougier
- APHP Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne, France; Val d’Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Assenat E, Thézenas S, Samalin E, Bibeau F, Portales F, Azria D, Quenet F, Rouanet P, Saint Aubert B, Senesse P. The value of endoscopic rectal ultrasound in predicting the lateral clearance and outcome in patients with lower-third rectal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopy 2007; 39:309-13. [PMID: 17354183 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is able to predict histological infiltration of the external anal sphincter or the levator ani muscle in patients with a lower-third rectal neoplasm and so the possibility of treatment by sphincter-saving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between May 1996 and May 2003, 66 patients with a lower-third rectal neoplasm that was staged as uT2 or greater were entered into a prospective evaluation of ERUS. All patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. RESULTS The first ERUS (ERUS 1) was performed before neoadjuvant treatment; the second ERUS (ERUS 2) was performed between the end of the radiotherapy and the surgery. An abdominoperineal resection was performed mainly when the lower extent of the tumor was within 3.5 cm from the anal verge (P = 0.011), but no correlation was observed between the lateral clearance determined by ERUS 1 and the histological clearance (P = 0.091). After neoadjuvant treatment, the ERUS 2 lateral clearance was significantly correlated with the type of surgery (P = 0.003) and the histological clearance (P < 0.001). With regard to the performance of ERUS 2 for predicting histological infiltration of the external anal sphincter or the levator ani muscle, the sensitivity was 100%, the negative predictive value was 100%, the specificity was 87%, and the positive predictive value was 53%. In a multivariate analysis, the histological clearance and tumor T stage were statistically correlated with disease-free survival (P = 0.035 and P = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ERUS could help oncologists and surgeons in the management of patients with lower rectal carcinomas. Moreover, ERUS is able to predict lateral histological clearance after neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Assenat
- Department of Nutrition and Digestive Oncology, Val d'Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Samalin E, Assenat E, Bauret P, Senesse P. Self-expandable metal stents placed with overtube for the treatment of malignant obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract in 33 consecutive patients. Endoscopy 2007; 39 Suppl 1:E101. [PMID: 17440856 DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E Samalin
- Department of Nutrition and Digestive Oncology, Val d'Aurelle Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Samalin E, Tchirikchian K, Cadiot G, Thiéfin G, Yaziji N, Diebold MD, Carquin J, Jaussaud R. [Cytomegalovirus infection in a patient with Crohn's disease]. Rev Med Interne 2003; 24:477-80. [PMID: 12829224 DOI: 10.1016/s0248-8663(03)00149-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|