In vitro pharmacodynamic activity of gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae containing specific mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV

Fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: area under the concentration-time curve/MIC ratio and resistance development with gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin

The potential for resistance development in Streptococcus pneumoniae secondary to exposure to gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin at various levels was examined at high inoculum (10(8.5) to 10(9) log10 CFU/ml) over 96 h in an in vitro pharmacodynamic (PD) model using two fluoroquinolone-susceptible isolates. The pharmacokinetics of each drug was simulated to provide a range of free areas under the concentration-time curves (fAUC) that correlated with various fluoroquinolone doses. Potential first (parC and parE)- and second-step (gyrA and gyrB) mutations in isolates with raised MICs were identified by sequence analysis. PD models simulating fAUC/MICs of 51 and<or=60, 34 and 37, <or=82 and<or=86, and<or=24 for gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin, respectively, against each isolate were associated with first-step parC (S52G, S79Y, and N91D) and second-step gyrA (S81Y and S114G) mutations. For each fluoroquinolone a delay of first- and second-step mutations was observed with increasingly higher fAUC/MIC ratios and recovery of topoisomerase mutations in S. pneumoniae was related to the fAUC/MIC exposure. Clinical doses of gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin exceeded the fAUC/MIC resistance breakpoint against wild-type S. pneumoniae, whereas those of levofloxacin (500 and 750 mg) were associated with first- and second-step mutations. The exposure breakpoints for levofloxacin were significantly different (P<0.001) from those of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Additionally, moxifloxacin breakpoints were significantly lower (P<0.002) than those of gatifloxacin. The order of resistance development determined from fAUC/MIC breakpoints was levofloxacin>gatifloxacin>moxifloxacin=gemifloxacin, which may be related to structural differences within the class.

In vitro activity of tigecycline against quinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Tigecycline is a glycylcycline with promising broad-spectrum activity, including resistant Gram-positive organisms. This study characterizes in vitro activity of tigecycline against quinolone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (QRSP), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE). An in vitro pharmacodynamic model generated specific bacterial kill profiles for tigecycline against clinical isolates of QRSP, MRSA and VRE. Tigecycline produced a 6.6 log total reduction and cleared QRSP from the pharmacodynamic model by 18 h. Tigecycline and vancomycin were unable to achieve 3-log reductions in the MRSA and VRE isolates; log reductions in MRSA and VRE were 1.5 and 1.2 logs for tigecycline and 2.8 and zero for vancomycin, respectively. Area under the concentration time curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) values for tigecycline ranged from 79 to 158 microg h/mL and tigecycline concentrations remained above the MIC (T>MIC) throughout the simulated dosing interval. Tigecycline showed in vitro activity against the QRSP, MRSA and VRE isolates studied. Low MIC values, prolonged elimination half-life and the associated post-antibiotic effect (PAE) observed with tigecycline are desirable attributes that make it a potentially attractive option for treating resistant Gram-positive organisms.

[Antibiotherapy for acute CAP in adults]

Community acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infections. With time, bacterial epidemiology and bacterial resistance evolve and new antibiotics become available. So an up-date on adequate antibiotic use is necessary. We reviewed the epidemiology of pneumonia and the evolution of bacterial resistance. We also collected data on new antibiotics which can be used for this infection such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin, and pristinamycin. All these drugs are effective on bacteria involved in pneumonia. At this time, only few Streptococcus pneumoniae strains have developed resistance to these drugs. However, resistance to fluoroquinolones is not easily detected with common laboratory techniques. There is no effectiveness difference between the 2 new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) in clinical studies. However, in bacteriological and pharmacological studies, moxifloxacin seems to be more effective than levofloxacin (500 mg/day). For the treatment of pneumonia due to Legionella pneumophila, fluoroquinolones are now widely recommended. For Streptococcus pneumonia, amoxicillin remain the drug of choice, even for bacteria with a decreased susceptibility to penicillin. The importance of treating atypical pathogens remains to be documented.

Pharmacodynamic assessment of the activity of high-dose (750 mg) levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin against clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The objective of this study was to comparatively evaluate specific bacterial killing ability of high-dose (750 mg) levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin against 2 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA-21 and PA-2105). An in vitro pharmacodynamic modeling apparatus was used to expose the P. aeruginosa isolates to total peak concentrations and elimination characteristics associated with each quinolone. All experiments were conducted over 24 h, and a subsequent dose of ciprofloxacin was given at 12 h to emulate twice-daily dosing. Respective 3-log reductions in PA-24 occurred after 0.6, 1.0, and 2.6 h for levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and gatifloxacin; regrowth was seen with all 3 agents, but was greatest with gatifloxacin. PA-2105 had 2- to 4-fold higher minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) than PA-24. Gatifloxacin failed to achieve a 3-log reduction. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin took roughly 3.5 h to decrease initial inoculum by 3 logs, but regrowth of PA-2105 followed. Simulated doses of levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin showed comparable activity against each study isolate; less activity was observed with gatifloxacin. Levofloxacin versus PA-24 was the only regimen that approached the desired AUC/MIC(0-24) ratio of greater than 100-125 and achieved the targeted peak/MIC ratio of > or =8. Although quinolones are typically used in combination with other antibiotics for P. aeruginosa, differences in activity favor the use of levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin for the study isolates. Use of gatifloxacin may contribute to the increased rate of quinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Moxifloxacin (Avelox) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial with a methoxy group in the C-8 position and a bulky C-7 side chain. Moxifloxacin is approved for use in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (approved indications may differ between countries). Moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, including activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. It achieves good tissue penetration and has a convenient once-daily administration schedule, as well as being available in both intravenous and oral formulations in some markets. Moxifloxacin has good efficacy in the treatment of patients with AECB, CAP, acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and is generally well tolerated. Thus, moxifloxacin is an important option in the treatment of bacterial infections.

In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Gatifloxacin Compared with Other Quinolones against Clinical Isolates from Cancer Patients

Owing to the predominance of gram-positive pathogens in neutropenic cancer patients, newer generation quinolones with an expanded gram-positive spectrum and enhanced potency, may have a role to play for prophylaxis and/or empiric therapy in such patients. The in vitro activity of gatifloxacin was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and trovafloxacin against 848 recent clinical isolates from cancer patients. Against gram-positive organisms, gatifloxacin was the most active agent tested inhibiting all Aerococcus, Listeria monocytogens, Micrococcus, Stomatococcus mucilaginous, Bacillus, and Rhodococcus equi strains at < or =2 mg/l, its designated susceptibility breakpoint. It was also very active against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci and Streptococcus spp. (including penicillin nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and viridans streptococci). It had moderate activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci and Enterococcus faecalis, inhibiting 68-80% of these strains at < or =2 mg/l. Gatifloxacin also had good activity against the Enterobacteriaceae (although ciprofloxacin was more potent) inhibiting >95% of isolates at < or =1 mg/l. Nonfermentative gram-negative organisms were less susceptible to all 4 agents. Gatifloxacin was very active against Acinetobacter lwoffi (MIC100 0.12 mg/l) and had moderate activity against Acinetobacter baumanii, Chryseobacterium spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Pseudomonas species. Alcaligenes xylosoxidans strains were relatively resistant to all 4 agents.