Transmyocardial revascularization with CO2 laser in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Clinical results from the Norwegian randomized trial

Refractory angina pectoris: a 20-year (2003-2022) bibliometric analysis

Background

The increasing number of patients with refractory angina pectoris, combined with the aging population and improved survival rates among coronary heart disease patients, presents a significant challenge in contemporary cardiovascular medicine. The treatment of refractory angina has been an ongoing area of exploration, yet a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on this topic is currently lacking. Therefore, this study aims to provide the first bibliometric analysis of publications related to refractory angina.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in the Web of Science database to identify articles related to refractory angina published between 2003 and 2022. The inclusion criteria were limited to articles and reviews written in English. CiteSpace software was utilized to conduct a collaborative network analysis of countries/regions, institutions and authors, co-occurrence analysis of keywords, and co-citation analysis of authors and references.

Results

A total of 1,386 publications were identified, with an annual publication volume exhibiting fluctuation over time. American and European countries and institutions demonstrated a leading position in terms of research output. Henry TD emerged as the most prolific researcher in the field, while Mannheimer C received the highest number of citations. The primary research hotspot within this field focused on the treatment of refractory angina, with recent emphasis on emerging treatments such as stem cell therapy and the coronary sinus reducer. A significant number of clinical trials have been conducted, with a continuous focus on patient benefits, quality of life, and survival prognosis.

Conclusion

Significant progress has been made in the field of refractory angina pectoris in recent years. Novel treatment methods, including spinal cord stimulation, enhanced external counterpulsation, stem cell therapy, and the coronary sinus reducer, hold promising therapeutic prospects. However, further high-quality evidence-based research is essential to support these emerging interventions. Additionally, the development of comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for refractory angina treatment is crucial. Such guidelines would provide clinicians with a framework to navigate the complexities of treatment choices and optimize patient care in this challenging condition.

Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Diabetic Heart Disease: Mechanisms and Therapies

Significance: Diabetic heart disease (DHD) is the primary cause of mortality in people with diabetes. A significant contributor to the development of DHD is the disruption of redox balance due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction resulting from sustained high glucose levels. Therapies specifically focusing on the suppression of ROS will hugely benefit patients with DHD. Recent Advances: In addition to the gold standard pharmacological therapies, the recent development of gene therapy provides an exciting avenue for developing new therapeutics to treat ROS-mediated DHD. In particular, microRNAs (miRNAs) are gaining interest due to their crucial role in several physiological and pathological processes, including DHD. Critical Issues: miRNAs have many targets and differential function depending on the environment. Therefore, a proper understanding of the function of miRNAs in specific cell types and cell states is required for the successful application of this technology. In the present review, we first provide an overview of the role of ROS in contributing to DHD and the currently available treatments. We then discuss the newer gene therapies with a specific focus on the role of miRNAs as the causative factors and therapeutic targets to combat ROS-mediated DHD. Future Directions: The future of miRNA therapeutics in tackling ROS-mediated DHD is dependent on a complete understanding of how miRNAs behave in different cells and environments. Future research should also aim to develop conditional miRNA therapeutic platforms capable of switching on and off in response to disruptions in the redox state. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 36, 608-630.

Son of a Lesser God: The Case of Cell Therapy for Refractory Angina

In the last decades, various non-pharmacological solutions have been tested on top of medical therapy for the treatment of patients affected by refractory angina (RA). Among these therapeutics, neuromodulation, external counter-pulsation and coronary sinus constriction have been recently introduced in the guidelines for the management of RA in United States and Europe. Notably and paradoxically, although a consistent body of evidence has proposed cell-based therapies (CT) as safe and salutary for RA outcome, CT has not been conversely incorporated into current international guidelines yet. As a matter of fact, published randomized controlled trials (RCT) and meta-analyses (MTA) cumulatively indicated that CT can effectively increase perfusion, physical function and well-being, thus reducing angina symptoms and drug assumption in RA patients. In this review, we (i) provide an updated overview of novel non-pharmacological therapeutics included in current guidelines for the management of patients with RA, (ii) discuss the Level of Evidence stemmed from available clinical trials for each recommended treatment, and (iii) focus on evidence-based CT application for the management of RA.

Refractory Angina: the Current State of Mechanical Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Refractory angina (RA), which is characterized by tissue ischemia along with neurological, mitochondrial, and psychogenic dysfunction, is becoming a major cause of morbidity in patients with advanced coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss in detail the invasive mechanical non-cell therapy-based options, the evidence behind these therapies, and future trends.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is extensive ongoing research in the areas of spinal-cord stimulation, transmyocardial laser revascularization, sympathectomy, angiogenesis, and other non-cell-based therapies to explore the best therapy for refractory angina. There is conflicting data in the literature suggesting subjective improvement in angina, but very few studies boast improvement in core objective parameters such as myocardial blood flow, survival, or rehospitalizations. Patients with refractory angina are a complex group of patients that need novel approaches to help alleviate their symptoms and reduce mortality. A carefully selected sequence of therapies may provide the best results in this patient population.

Transmyocardial revascularization (TMR): current status and future directions

Purpose

Cardiac surgeons are increasingly faced with a more complex patient who has developed a pattern of diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD), which is refractory to medical, percutaneous, and surgical interventions. This paper will review the clinical science surrounding transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) with an emphasis on the results from randomized controlled trials.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials which evaluated TMR used as sole therapy and when combined with coronary artery bypass grafting were reviewed. Pertinent basic science papers exploring TMR's possible mechanism of action along with future directions, including the synergism between TMR and cell-based therapies were reviewed.

Results

Two laser-based systems have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to deliver laser therapy to targeted areas of the left ventricle (LV) that cannot be revascularized using conventional methods: the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser system (CryoLife, Inc., Kennesaw, GA) and the carbon dioxide (CO₂) Heart Laser System (Novadaq Technologies Inc., (Mississauga, Canada). TMR can be performed either as a stand-alone procedure (sole therapy) or in conjunction with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients who would be incompletely revascularized by CABG alone. Societal practice guidelines have been established and are supportive of using TMR in the difficult population of patients with diffuse CAD.

Conclusions

Patients with diffuse CAD have increased operative and long-term cardiac risks predicted by incomplete revascularization. The documented operative and long-term benefits associated with sole therapy and adjunctive TMR in randomized trials supports TMR's increased use in this difficult patient population.

Clinical outcomes meta-analysis: measuring subendocardial perfusion and efficacy of transmyocardial laser revascularization with nuclear imaging

INTRODUCTION

Randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials have tried to assess whether or not TMR patients experience an increase in myocardial perfusion. However there have been inconsistencies reported in the literature due to the use of different nuclear imaging modalities to test this metric. The primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether SPECT, MUGA and PET scans demonstrate changes in myocardial perfusion between lased and non-lased subjects and whether laser type affects myocardial perfusion. The secondary purpose was to examine the overall effect of laser therapy on clinical outcomes including survival, hospital re-admission and angina reduction.

METHODS

Sixteen studies were included in the primary endpoint analysis after excluding all other non-imaging TMR papers. Standardized mean difference was used as the effect size for all quantitative outcomes and log odds ratio was used as the effect size for all binary outcomes.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements in myocardial perfusion were observed between control and treatment groups in myocardial perfusion at 6-month follow up using PET imaging with a porcine model. However non-significant differences were observed in patients at 3 and 12 months using SPECT, PET or MUGA scans. Both CO₂ and Ho:YAG laser systems demonstrated an increase in myocardial perfusion however this effect was not statistically significant. In addition both laser types displayed statistically significant decreases in patient angina at 3, 6 and 12 months but non-significant increases in survival rates and decreases in hospital re-admissions.

CONCLUSION

In order to properly assess myocardial perfusion in TMR subjects, subendocardial perfusion needs to be analyzed via nuclear imaging. PET scans can provide this level of sensitivity and should be utilized in future studies to monitor and detect perfusion changes in lased and non-lased subjects.

Newer Therapies for Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease With Focus on Refractory Angina

Ischemic heart disease remains a major public health problem nationally and internationally. Stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is one of the clinical manifestations of ischemic heart disease and is generally characterized by episodes of reversible myocardial demand/supply mismatch, related to ischemia or hypoxia, which are usually inducible by exercise, emotion, or other stress and reproducible-but which may also be occurring spontaneously. Improvements in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes along with increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, including diabetes and obesity, have led to increasing population of patients with SIHD. A significant number of these continue to have severe angina despite medical management and revascularization procedures performed and may progress to refractory angina. This article reviews the newer therapies in the treatment of SIHD with special focus in treating patients with refractory angina.

Epidemiology and pathogenesis of diffuse obstructive coronary artery disease: the role of arterial stiffness, shear stress, monocyte subsets and circulating microparticles

Despite falling age-adjusted mortality rates coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Advanced diffuse CAD is becoming an important entity of modern cardiology as more patients with historical revascularisation no longer have suitable anatomy for additional procedures. Advances in the treatment of diffuse obstructive CAD are hampered by a poor understanding of its development. Although the likelihood of developing clinically significant (obstructive) CAD is linked to traditional risk factors, the morphology of obstructive CAD among individuals is highly variable - some patients have diffuse stenotic disease, while others have a focal stenosis. This is challenging to explain in mechanistic terms as vascular endothelium is equally exposed to injury stimulants. Patients with diffuse disease are at high risk of adverse outcomes, particularly if unsuitable for revascularisation. We searched multiple electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database) and reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis and prognosis relating to advanced diffuse CAD with particular focus on the role of endothelial shear stress, large artery stiffness, monocyte subsets and circulating microparticles. Key messages Although traditional CAD risk factors correlate strongly with disease severity, significant individual variation in disease morphology exists. Advanced, diffuse CAD is difficult to treat effectively and can significantly impair quality of life and increases mortality. The pathophysiology associated with the progression of CAD is the result of complex maladaptive interaction between the endothelium, cells of the immune system and patterns of blood flow.

Transmyocardial Revascularization: Peril and Potential

Transmyocardial laser revascularization is a technique for the treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris that is refractory to medical therapy and who are not eligible for surgical intervention. Percutaneous myocardial revascularization is a less-invasive catheter-based procedure that has been adapted from transmyocardial laser revascularization. Six prospective randomized clinical trials have been performed with transmyocardial laser revascularization and 5 have been performed using percutaneous myocardial revascularization. All of the transmyocardial laser revascularization and 4 of the percutaneous myocardial revascularization studies showed a significant improvement in angina class; however, results for improved survival, increased exercise tolerance, improved ejection fraction, and improved myocardial perfusion were less definitive. Transmyocardial laser revascularization has significant potential for morbidity and mortality. This article summarizes the results of the randomized trials, explains the current theories for the mechanism of transmyocardial laser revascularization, and discusses its current role in treatment for patients, considering the evidence that currently exists.

Alternative therapy for medically refractory angina: enhanced external counterpulsation and transmyocardial laser revascularization

Medically refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is defined by presence of severe angina with objective evidence of ischemia and failure to relieve symptoms with coronary revascularization. Medication and invasive revascularization are the most common approaches for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Although symptoms are eliminated or alleviated by these invasive approaches, the disease and its causes are present after treatment. New treatment approaches are needed to prevent the disease from progressing and symptoms from recurring. External enhanced counterpulsation therapy provides a treatment modality in the management of CAD and can complement invasive revascularization procedures. Data support that it should be considered a first-line treatment of RAP.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory angina

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a review previously published in 2009. Chronic angina and advanced forms of coronary disease are increasingly more frequent. In spite of the improvement in the efficacy of available revascularization treatments, a subgroup of patients continue suffering from refractory angina. Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) has been proposed to improve the clinical situation of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (both benefits and harms) of TMLR versus optimal medical treatment in people with refractory angina who are not candidates for percutaneous coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft, in alleviating angina severity, reducing mortality and improving ejection fraction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following resources up to June 2014: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. We applied no languages restrictions. We also checked reference lists of relevant papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected studies if they fulfilled the following criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TMLR, by thoracotomy, in patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society or New York Heart Association angina grade III-IV who were excluded from other revascularization procedures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data for each trial about the population and interventions compared and assessed the risk of bias of the studies, evaluating randomisation sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding (of participants, personnel and outcome assessors), incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other potential sources of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

From a total of 502 references, we retrieved 47 papers for more detailed evaluation. We selected 20 papers, reporting data from seven studies, which included 1137 participants, of which 559 were randomized to TMLR. Participants and professionals were not blinded, which suggests high risk of performance bias. Overall, 43.8% of participants in the treatment group decreased two angina classes, as compared with 14.8% in the control group: odds ratio (OR) 4.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.43 to 6.25), and heterogeneity was present. Mortality by intention-to-treat analysis was similar in both groups at 30 days (4.0% in the TMLR group and 3.5% in the control group), and one year (12.2% in the TMLR group and 11.9% in the control group). However, the 30-day mortality as-treated was 6.8% in the TMLR group and 0.8% in the control group (pooled OR was 3.76, 95% CI 1.63 to 8.66), mainly due to a higher mortality in participants crossing from standard treatment to TMLR. The assessment of subjective outcomes, such as improvement in angina, was affected by a high risk of bias and this may explain the differences found. Other adverse events such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmias or heart failure, were not considered in this review, as they were not predefined outcomes in trials design and they show a high inconsistency across studies. No new trials on transmyocardial laser revascularization have been published in the last ten years and it is very unlikely that new research will be undertaken in this field.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that risks associated with TMLR outweigh the potential clinical benefits. Subjective outcomes are subject to high risk of bias and no differences were found in survival, but a significant increase in postoperative mortality and other safety outcomes suggests that the procedure may pose unacceptable risks.

Long-term outcomes after transmyocardial revascularization

BACKGROUND

Two independent reports documented substantially higher operative mortality associated with transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) when used in isolation than that reported in the premarket clinical trials. To clarify the state of the art, this article assesses temporal trends in the use of TMR, short-term and long-term outcomes, and outcomes stratified by procedure type (TMR only and TMR + coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) and by the 2 specific TMR devices.

METHODS

The study population included all patients undergoing TMR in isolation or in combination with CABG at 435 cardiothoracic hospitals in the United States participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) from January 2000 through November 2006 (n = 15,386). Analysis of long-term outcomes was accomplished through linkage to Medicare claims data. Short-term and long-term (7 years) adverse outcomes were assessed and compared between the 2 TMR device types.

RESULTS

The use of TMR in conjunction with CABG surgery is increasing. This study showed modest differences in short-term morbidity and mortality between the 2 devices. In combination with CABG, after risk adjustment, patients treated with the holmium:YAG laser (experienced a higher rate of operative mortality (3.5% vs 2.5%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence level 1.03 to 1.87) but no difference in the composite short-term rate of major morbidity or mortality, compared with the Heart Laser CO2 transmyocardial revascularization system (PLC Medical Systems, Inc, Milford, MA). However, there were no clinically meaningful differences in long-term results.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest differences in short-term morbidity and mortality between the 2 devices suggest the usefulness of further research.

Therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia revisited: basic biological concepts and focus on latest clinical trials

Therapeutic angiogenesis is based on the premise that the development of new blood vessels can be augmented by exogenous administration of the appropriate growth factors. Over the last years, successful preclinical studies and promising results of early clinical trials have created great excitement about the potential of therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with advanced ischemic heart disease. The authors provide an overview of the biology of angiogenesis, the basic characteristics of angiogenic factors, and the different routes of their delivery. They discuss experimental studies in animal models of myocardial ischemia and outline available clinical studies on therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia. Related safety issues are also addressed followed by a critical perspective about the future of proangiogenic therapies for ischemic cardiovascular disorders. Despite the established proof of concept and reasonable safety, however, results of the latest trials on therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia have provided inconsistent results and the definite means of inducing clinically useful therapeutic angiogenesis remain elusive. More studies are required to gain further insights into the biology of angiogenesis and address pharmacological limitations of current approaches of angiogenic therapy. The authors hope and envisage that in the not-too-distant future, these investigative efforts will lead to important new strategies for treatment of myocardial ischemic syndromes. Means of non-invasive individualized pharmacological therapeutic neovascularization may be the next major advance in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease.

Does laser type impact myocardial function following transmyocardial laser revascularization?

BACKGROUND

Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) is currently clinically performed with either a CO(2) or Ho:YAG laser for the treatment of severe angina. While both lasers provide symptomatic relief, there are significant differences in the laser-tissue interactions specific to each device that may impact their ability to enhance the perfusion of myocardium and thereby improve contractile function of the ischemic heart.

METHODS

A porcine model of chronic myocardial ischemia was employed. After collecting baseline functional data with cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dobutamine stress echo (DSE), 14 animals underwent TMR with either a CO(2) or Ho:YAG laser. Transmural channels were created with each laser in a distribution of 1/cm(2) in the ischemic zone. Six weeks post-treatment repeat MRI as well as DSE were obtained after which the animals were sacrificed. Histology was preformed to characterize the laser-tissue interaction.

RESULTS

CO(2) TMR led to improvement in wall thickening in the ischemic area as seen with cine MRI (40.3% vs. baseline, P < 0.05) and DSE (20.2% increase vs. baseline, P < 0.05). Ho:YAG treated animals had no improvement in wall thickening by MRI (-11.6% vs. baseline, P = .67) and DSE (-16.7% vs. baseline, P = 0.08). Correlative semi-quantitative histology revealed a significantly higher fibrosis index in Ho:YAG treated myocardium versus CO(2) (1.81 vs. 0.083, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a side-by-side comparison CO(2) TMR resulted in improved function of ischemic myocardium as assessed by MRI and echocardiography. Ho:YAG TMR led to no improvement in regional function likely due to concomitant increase in fibrosis in the lasered area.

Mid term results after bone marrow laser revascularization for treating refractory angina

Background

To evaluate the midterm results of patients with angina and diffuse coronary artery disease treated with transmyocardial revascularization in combination with autologous stem cell therapy.

Methods

Nineteen patients with diffuse coronary artery disease and medically refractory class III/IV angina were evaluated between June 2007 and December 2009 for sole therapy TMR combined with intramyocardial injection of concentrated stem cells. At the time of surgery, autologous bone marrow (120cc) was aspirated from the iliac crest. A cardiac MRI and an isotopic test were performed before and after the procedure. Follow-up was performed by personal interview.

Results

There were no perioperative adverse events including no arrhythmias. Mean number of laser channels was 20 and the mean total number of intramyocardially injected cells per milliliter were: total mononuclear cells(83.6 × 10⁶), CD34+ cells(0.6 × 10⁶), and CD133+ cells(0.34 × 10⁶). At 12 months mean follow-up average angina class was significantly improved (3.4 ± 0.5 vs 1.4 ± 0.6; p = 0.004). In addition, monthly cardiovascular medication usage was significantly decreased (348 ± 118 vs. 201 ± 92; p = 0.001). At six months follow up there was a reduction in the number of cardiac hospital readmissions (2.9 ± 2.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.8; p < 0.001). MRI showed no alterations regarding LV volumes and a 3% improvement regarding ejection fraction.

Conclusions

The stem cell isolator efficiently concentrated autologous bone marrow derived stem cells while the TMR/stem cell combination delivery device worked uneventfully. An improvement in clinical status was noticed in the midterm follow-up. Images test showed no morphological alterations in the left ventricle after the procedure.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory angina

BACKGROUND

Chronic angina and advanced forms of coronary disease are increasingly more frequent. Although the improved efficacy of available revascularization treatments, a subgroup of patients present with refractory angina. Transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) has been proposed to improve the clinical situation of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of TMLR versus optimal medical treatment in patients with refractory angina in alleviating the severity of angina and improving survivorship and heart function.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2 2007), MEDLINE (January 2006 to June 2007), EMBASE ( 2004 to June 2007) and ongoing studies were sought using the metaRegister of Controlled Trials database (mRCT) and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. No languages restrictions were applied. Reference lists of relevant papers were also checked.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected if they fulfilled the following criteria: randomized controlled trials of TMLR, by thoracotomy, in patients with angina grade III-IV who were excluded from other revascularization procedures. From a total of 181 references, 20 papers were selected, reporting data from seven studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers abstracted data from selected papers; . The reviewers performed independently both quality assessment and data extraction. Selected studies present methodological weaknesses. None of them fulfilled all the quality criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies (1137 participants of which 559 randomized to TMLR) were included. Overall, 43.8 % of patients in the treatment group decreased two angina classes as compared with 14.8 % in the control group, odds ratio (OR) of 4.63 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.43 to 6.25), and heterogeneity was statistically significant. Mortality by intention-to-treat analysis at both 30 days (4.0 % in the TMLR group and 3.5 % in the control group) and 1 year (12.2 % in the TMLR group and 11.9 % in the control group) was similar in both groups. The 30-days mortality as treated was 6.8% in TMLR group and 0.8% in the control group, showing a statistically significant difference. The pooled OR was 3.76 (95% CI 1.63 to 8.66), because of the higher mortality in patients crossing from standard treatment to TMLR.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the clinical benefits of TMLR outweigh the potential risks. The procedure is associated with a significant early mortality.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization: from randomized trials to clinical practice. A review of techniques, evidence-based outcomes, and future directions

Cardiac surgeons are increasingly faced with a more complex patient who has developed a pattern of diffuse coronary artery disease that cannot be completely revascularized by CAGB alone. Considering the increased operative and long-term cardiac risks predicted by incomplete revascularization, and the documented operative and long-term benefits associated with sole therapy and adjunctive TMR in randomized patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, increased use of sole therapy and adjunctive TMR therapy is warranted.

Transmyocardial laser revascularization

It has been almost a decade since transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) was approved for clinical use in the United States. The safety of TMR was demonstrated initially with nonrandomized studies in which TMR was used as the only treatment for patients with severe angina. TMR efficacy was proven after multiple randomized controlled trials. These revealed significant angina relief compared to maximum medical therapy in patients with diffuse coronary disease not amenable to conventional revascularization. In light of these results, TMR has been used as an adjunct to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). By definition, patients treated with this combined therapy have more severe coronary disease and comorbidities that are associated with end-stage atherosclerosis. Combination CABG + TMR has resulted in symptomatic improvement without additional risk. The likely mechanism whereby TMR has provided benefit is the angiogenesis engendered by the laser-tissue interaction. Improved perfusion and concomitant improvement in myocardial function have been observed post-TMR. Additional therapies to enhance the angiogenic response include combining TMR with stem cell-based treatments, which appear to be promising future endeavors.

Clinical and research issues regarding chronic advanced coronary artery disease part II: Trial design, outcomes, and regulatory issues

The population of patients with advanced coronary artery disease (CAD) is growing as a result of the aging of the general population, the extensive use of revascularization, and the efficacy of therapies that have prolonged the survival of patients with severe atherosclerosis. Patients with symptomatic CAD survive to a point where little else can be done to relieve their angina. Despite an anticipated growth in the number of patients with this condition within the next few decades, advanced CAD receives relatively little attention by the medical and research communities. As a result, the scope of the disease is not well defined, its coverage in guidelines from professional associations is limited, and few new medical options are available. In response to this, a group of experts from different fields were brought together at a meeting held December 4 to 5, 2006. This document has been developed as a 2-part article. In the first part, the contemporary and emerging therapies for advanced CAD were reviewed. The present part reviews the current status of understanding of advanced CAD, the limits of contemporary therapies, and the difficulties in and barriers to the development of new treatments.

Clinical and research issues regarding chronic advanced coronary artery disease: part I: Contemporary and emerging therapies

The following report is based on a working group meeting about advanced coronary artery disease for patients with refractory ischemia who cannot receive revascularization. The aims were to review currently available treatment strategies, define unmet clinical needs, explore clinical trial design issues, and identify promising novel therapeutic targets and approaches for patients with chronic ischemia. The Working Group brought together medical experts in the management of refractory angina with representatives from regulatory agencies, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and industry. The meeting began with presentations reviewing the limitations of the current medical therapies and revascularization strategies and focused on lessons learned from past therapeutic attempts to optimize outcomes and on what are considered to be the most promising new approaches. Perspectives from clinical experts and from regulatory agencies were juxtaposed against needs and concerns of industry regarding development of new therapeutic strategies. This report presents the considerations and conclusions of the meeting on December 4-5, 2006. This document has been developed as a 2-part article, with contemporary and emerging therapies for advanced coronary artery disease reviewed first. Trial design, end points, and regulatory issues will be discussed in the second part of the article.

Thoracoscopic transmyocardial laser revascularization: is prior coronary artery bypass grafting a contraindication?

OBJECTIVE

: Recently, thoracoscopic techniques have been used to perform transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMR) in patients who are not suitable candidates for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary interventions. Whether or not prior CABG contraindicates a port access-only approach to TMR is unclear. This study compares patients with and without prior CABG who have undergone thoracoscopic TMR.

METHODS

: Between May 2003 and October 2005, 23 consecutive patients (6 without prior CABG, group A; and 17 with prior CABG, group B) underwent thoracoscopic TMR, using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser system. Either 3 or 4 port incisions (each ≤2 cm in length) were used, depending on the patient's anatomy. Procedural success was defined as the ability to create all intended channels without conversion to thoracotomy.

RESULTS

: Patient demographics were not significantly different between group A and group B (mean age, 65.8 ± 4.3 years versus 67.4 ± 2.4 years, Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3.7 ± 0.2 versus 3.9 ± 0.1, and Parsonnet score 12.0 ± 3.2 versus 20.5 ± 2.4). Fourteen (82.4%) group B patients had a prior left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery graft, of which 12 (85.7%) were patent. One patient in group A had an airway injury at intubation that led to an extended hospital stay of 30 days. One patient in group A (16.7%) and one patient in group B (5.9%) required a blood transfusion (P = NS). Adhesion lysis time in group B ranged from 0 to 68 minutes (mean, 27 ± 5.6 minutes). Neither group had a conversion to thoracotomy or any deaths through a mean combined follow-up of 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

: A port access approach is safe and reproducible for patients who are candidates for sole therapy TMR. Prior CABG, including patent grafts, is not a contraindication to thoracoscopic TMR.

Coronary artery disease screening, treatment, and follow-up

Heart disease causes more than 30% of US deaths. Evidence-based screening allows a primary care physician to identify patients at risk before symptom onset. Estimating disease probability before screening affects which tests are appropriate. Low-risk adults should not be screened. ECG, exercise treadmill testing, cardiac stress imaging, electron beam computed tomography, and angiography are possible screening tests. Special populations may have additional screening indications. Management of patients who have coronary artery disease includes antiplatelet therapy; aggressive lipid lowering; management of hypertension with beta blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; risk factor management, including smoking cessation, diet, and exercise; symptom management; and sometimes revascularization. Primary care physicians are well-suited to the monitoring and care of patients who have known coronary artery disease.