The gender differences in the implementation and maintenance of a structured-enhanced education and follow-up program in primary prevention for coronary artery disease

Background

Primary prevention programs for coronary artery disease (CAD) may be effective in improving health-related behavioral outcomes. However, successful implementation and maintenance of these programs can vary amongst genders. The primary aim of this study is to assess the gender differences in a structured, enhanced education and follow-up program for CAD prevention in an area where the diverse population and economy are major problems.

Methods

SANKO CAD Prevention Project (SCAD-PPI) was designed as a longitudinal study and utilized medical school students to conduct the project under the supervision of professors. It began in 2014 and had two different education and training phases. In the first phase, every school year for second year Medical students underwent a year-long, especially designed training program on primary prevention for CAD. In the second phase, which took place in the second year of the study, a series of conferences regarding the primary prevention for CAD were organized by the University and local municipalities for underserved populations. Participants were prospectively assigned to an intervention where pre- and post-conference knowledge was collected and assessed. Every intervention was conducted by specially trained third year Medical students and an education booklet, which was specially designed for the study, was given to the participants. Every other month thereafter, for 6 months, each participant was followed-up via phone calls. At the 6 months follow -up, data was collected to assess the impact of the program on behavioral outcomes. Every year a new class assigned to undergo the same training program and serve to the local population at different locations within the same city and suburbs.

Results

A total of 172 participant were enrolled; 61% were women, mean age was 40±11.9 years with no significant difference in between the groups.; 67% of women were not working (p<0.001). While BMI rates were higher in women (27.9±5.5 kg/m2, p<0.016), smoking rates were higher in men (p<0.001). Overall, knowledge on CAD risk factors, primary prevention measures, diet, and daily exercise habits were poor in both groups. After the enhanced education and follow-up program there was a significant improvement on the knowledge of CAD risk factors and primary prevention measures in both groups (p<0.001). Importantly, the follow-up program led both groups to implement those positive changes into their lives and maintain a healthy lifestyle.

Conclusion

This is the first study which showed that a longitudinally structured training program of medical students could be utilized to implement an enhanced education and follow–up program for primary prevention of CAD in an economically challenged, underserved population with successful outcomes in both genders. This model program is not only beneficial for public interest, but also enhances active interaction of medical students with patients at a very early stage of their career.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

A new model to implement a structured enhanced education and follow-up program in primary prevention for coronary artery disease

Background

Primary prevention programs for coronary artery disease (CAD) may be effective in improving health-related behavioral outcomes. However, the implementation and especially the maintanance of these programs can be very challenging mainly due to staffing cost. Thus, the present study was designed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a longitudinally structured, enhanced education and follow-up program for CAD prevention in an area where the diverse population and economy are major problems.

Methods

SANKO Coronary Artery Disesae Prevention Project (SCAD-PPI) was designed as a longitudinal study and utilized medical school students to conduct the entire project under the supervision of professors. It started in 2014 and had 2 different education and training phases. In the first phase; every school year, 2nd year Medical students underwent a one-year, specially designed training program on primary prevention for CAD. In the second phase, which took place in the 2nd year of the study, a series of conferences on primary prevention for CAD were organized by the University and local municipalities for underserved populations. Participants were prospectively assigned to an intervention where pre and post conference knowledge were collected and assessed. Every intervention was conducted by specially trained 3rd year Medical students and an education booklet which was specifically designed for this study was given to the participants. Every other month thereafter, for 6 months, each participant was followed by phone. At the 6 month follow -up, data was collected to assess the impact of enhanced education and follow-up program on behavioral outcomes.

Results

A total of 135 participant were enrolled; 79% were women, mean age was 41±13 years, only 29% had a graduate school degree; 56% were not working. Mean BMI was 28.3±5.1kg/m2. Overall knowledge on CAD risk factors, primary prevention measures, diet and daily exercise habits were very poor. After the enhanced education and follow-up program there was a significant improvement on the knowledge of CAD risk factors and primary prevention measures (p<0.001). More importantly, the follow-up program led participants to implement those positive changes into their lives and maintain a healthy life style. A separate cost analysis showed significant savings.

Conclusion

This is the first study which showed that a longitudinally structured training program of medical students could be utilized to implement an enhanced education and follow–up program for primary prevention of CAD in an economically challenged, underserved population with successful outcomes. This model program is not only cost-effective and beneficial for public interest but also enhances active interaction of medical students with patients at a very early stage of their career.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Alternative therapy for medically refractory angina: enhanced external counterpulsation and transmyocardial laser revascularization

Medically refractory angina pectoris (RAP) is defined by presence of severe angina with objective evidence of ischemia and failure to relieve symptoms with coronary revascularization. Medication and invasive revascularization are the most common approaches for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Although symptoms are eliminated or alleviated by these invasive approaches, the disease and its causes are present after treatment. New treatment approaches are needed to prevent the disease from progressing and symptoms from recurring. External enhanced counterpulsation therapy provides a treatment modality in the management of CAD and can complement invasive revascularization procedures. Data support that it should be considered a first-line treatment of RAP.

Pulsatile venous waveform quality in Fontan circulation-clinical implications, venous assists options and the future

OBJECTIVE

Functionally univentricular heart (FUH) anomalies are the leading cause of death from all structural birth defects. Total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) is the last stage of the palliative surgical reconstruction with significant late hemodynamic complications requiring high-risk heart transplantation. Alternative therapeutic options for these critically ill patients are crucial. In Phase I, we investigated the effect of pulsatility of venous flow (VF) waveform on the performance of functional and "failing" Fontan (FF) patients based on conduit power loss. In phase 2, the effect of enhanced external counter pulsation on Fontan circulation flow rates is monitored.

METHODS

In phase 1, Doppler VFs were acquired from FF patients with ventricle dysfunction. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), hemodynamic efficiencies of the FF, functional and in-vitro generated mechanically assisted VF waveforms were evaluated. In phase 2, Fontan circulation on sheep model was created and enhanced external counter pulsation (EECP) applied.

RESULTS

Variations in the pulsatile content of the VF waveforms altered conduit efficiency notably. High frequency and low amplitude oscillations lowered the pulsatile component of power losses in FF VF waveforms. The systemic venous flow, pulmonary artery and aorta flows increased by utilizing EECP.

CONCLUSION

Our data highlighted the significance of VF pulsatility on energy efficiency inside SV circulation and the feasibility of VF waveform optimization. EECP assist in Fontan circulation can result in venous flow augmentation.

[Frequency of sublingual nitroglycerin prescription in patients with coronary artery disease and angina and awareness of patients about the shelf life of the drug]

OBJECTIVES

ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines recommend sublingual nitroglycerin (SNG) in patients with stable angina pectoris and coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the shelf life of SNG following first use is six months for SNG tablets and two years for SNG sprays. We investigated the frequency of prescription of SNG tablets/sprays in patients having anginal symptoms and documented CAD and the awareness levels of patients about appropriate use of SNG.

STUDY DESIGN

Three hundred patients (201 men, 99 women; mean age 61.7±10.8 years) with documented CAD and angina were enrolled into this study. Angina pectoris was categorized according to the functional classification system of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Data on cardiovascular past histories, risk factors, medications, and the use of SNG were recorded.

RESULTS

At least one risk factor was present in 96% of the patients. Only 46% of the patients had a prescription for SNG. Of those with a prescription of SNG tablet and spray, 91.8% and 84.4% did not know the shelf life of the product, respectively. Of those who were routinely carrying SNG, 35.6% had an expired product. Of those with a prescription of SNG, only 65.9% were informed by the physician on the proper use of SNG.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that, despite recommendations of the guidelines, SNG is not prescribed to a substantial percentage of patients with CAD and angina, a considerable fraction of patients carry an expired product, and that patients are not adequately informed by the physicians on the use of SNG. These problems will certainly affect the optimal medical management of CAD and its efficacy.

Management of refractory angina pectoris

Despite significant advances in revascularization techniques and medical therapy, there remains a significant population of patients who continue to have intractable angina symptoms. This review aims to define the patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) and to present the therapeutic options currently available for this condition. RAP itself is defined and the pharmacological treatment options other than traditional medical therapies are discussed. The latest therapeutic options for this patient population are extensively reviewed. Among the multitude of pharmacological and non-invasive therapeutic options for patients with RAP, ranolazine is a new drug indicated for the treatment of chronic angina, in combination with amlodipine, beta-blockers or nitrates. Enhanced external counterpulsation has not only been shown to improve symptoms, but also to improve long-term ventricular function in these patients. In randomized trials, neurostimulation has been shown to be effective in reducing angina symptoms. Transmyocardial laser revascularization has emerged as an invasive treatment for RAP over the last two decades. Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization gene therapy and percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization are still under investigation.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease: a current perspective

Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are both safe and established treatment modalities of invasive revascularization for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, conflicting information exists when comparing the long-term efficacy of the two methods. The optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) is still subject to discussion, given the lack of fairly designed, prospective, randomized data reflecting current practice in the modern era. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes after invasive revascularization differ according to the number of diseased vessels, presence or absence of diabetes, left main disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Hence, the question arises whether we should continue to use the term 'multivessel disease'. Conflicts of available data need to be addressed and overcome so that care of patients with CAD can be successfully tailored. In this review article we try to address some of the above conflicts, in an effort to improve our understanding in the care of patients with multivessel disease. We also provide an evidence-based perspective which may differ from the current standard of practice.

Does higher diastolic augmentation predict clinical benefit from enhanced external counterpulsation?: Data from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR)

BACKGROUND

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for stable angina in patients with coronary disease. The hemodynamic effects of EECP are maximized when the ratio of diastolic to systolic pressure area is in the range of 1.5 to 2.0.

HYPOTHESIS

It is hypothesized that patients undergoing EECP who are able to achieve higher diastolic augmentation (DA) ratios may derive greater clinical benefit. This study examines the relationship between the DA ratio and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing EECP.

METHODS

We analyzed demographic, noninvasive hemodynamic, and clinical outcome data on 1,004 patients enrolled in the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR) for treatment of chronic angina between January 1998 and August 1999. Blood pressure waveforms were recorded from finger plethysmography. Six-month clinical outcomes were obtained by telephone interview.

RESULTS

At the end of EECP treatment, 370 (37%) patients had a higher DA ratio (defined as > or = 1.5) and 634 (63%) had a lower DA ratio (defined as < 1.5). Factors associated with a lower DA ratio included age > or =65 years (p <0.001), female gender (p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p < 0.05), hypertension (p < 0.01), prior coronary bypass surgery (p < 0.01), noncardiac vascular disease (p < 0.001), multivessel disease (p < 0.01), congestive heart failure (p < 0.01), current smoking (p < 0.01), unsuitability for further revascularization (p < 0.001), and higher baseline angina class (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding diabetes mellitus, prior coronary angioplasty, prior myocardial infarction, or antianginal medication use between patients with higher or lower DA ratios. Based on a multiple logistic regression model, independent predictors of a DA ratio < 1.5 at the end of EECP included current smoking (odds ratio 3.3; 95% confidence intervals 2.0-5.4); multivessel disease (1.7; 1.3-2.3); female gender (2.2; 1.7-3.0); no prior EECP (1.9; 1.1-3.3); noncardiac vascular disease (2.3; 1.7-2.9); age > or = 65 years (1.7; 1.4-2.2), and patients not suitable for revascularization (1.6; 1.2-2.0). By the end of therapy, there were no significant differences in myocardial infarction, revascularization rates, or nitroglycerin use with respect to higher DA ratios. At 6-month follow-up, patients with higher DA had a trend toward a greater reduction in angina class compared with those with lower DA (p = 0.069). There was a significantly higher rate of unstable angina and congestive heart failure in the group not achieving higher augmentation (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who are younger, male, nonsmoking, and without multivessel coronary or noncardiac vascular disease are most likely to have higher DA with EECP. Patients with higher DA tended to have a greater reduction in angina class at 6-month follow-up compared with those with lower DA ratios. There is evidence that higher DA ratios are associated with improved short- or long-term clinical outcomes, suggesting that clinical benefit from EECP is associated with the magnitude of DA.

Two-year outcomes in patients with mild refractory angina treated with enhanced external counterpulsation

BACKGROUND

In the International Enhanced External Counterpulsation Patient Registry (IEPR), approximately 85% of the patients treated are in Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class III-IV with no option for further invasive coronary revascularization procedures.

HYPOTHESIS

This study sought to determine whether it is clinically important to establish whether the observed durable reduction in disabling severe angina with enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment can be extended to those with less severe CCS class II angina, who also have no option for further revascularization.

METHODS

This study evaluated the immediate response, durability and clinical events over a 2-year period after EECP treatment in 112 patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class II angina versus 1346 patients with class III-IV angina using data from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR).

RESULTS

Treatment with EECP significantly (by at least one CCS class) reduced angina frequency, nitroglycerin use, and improved quality of life in both groups. At 2-year follow-up, 74% of class II and 70% of class III-IV patients remained free of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and continued to demonstrate a durable CCS class improvement over baseline.

CONCLUSION

The robust effectiveness of EECP as a noninvasive device, together with its relatively low start-up and recurrent costs, makes it an attractive consideration for treating patients with milder refractory angina in addition to the patient with severely disabling angina treated in current practice.

Effect of enhanced external counterpulsation on medically refractory angina patients with erectile dysfunction

Patients with refractory angina often suffer from erectile dysfunction. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) decreases symptoms of angina, and increases nitric oxide release. This study evaluated the effect of EECP on sexual function in men with severe angina. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was used to assess erectile function of severe angina patients enroled in the International EECP Patient Registry. Their symptom status, medication use, adverse clinical events and quality of life were also recorded before and after completing a course of EECP. A cohort of 120 men (mean age 65.0+/-9.7) was enroled. The men had severe coronary disease with 69% having a prior myocardial infarction, 90% prior coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention, 49% with three vessel coronary artery disease, 86% were not candidates for further revascularisation, 71% hypertensive, 83% dyslipidaemia, 42% diabetes mellitus, 75% smoking and 68% using nitrates. Functional status was low with a mean Duke Activity Status Inventory score of 16.6+/-14.8. After 35 h of EECP anginal status improved in 89%, and functional status in 63%. A comparison of the IIEF scores pre- and post-EECP therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in erectile function from 10.0+/-1.0 to 11.8+/-1.0 (p=0.003), intercourse satisfaction (4.2+/-0.5 to 5.0+/-0.5, p=0.009) and overall satisfaction (4.7+/-0.3 to 5.3+/-0.3, p=0.001). However, there were no significant changes in orgasmic function (4.2+/-0.4 to 4.6+/-0.4, p=0.19) or sexual desire (5.3+/-0.2 to 5.5+/-0.2). The findings suggest that EECP therapy is associated with improvement in erectile function in men with refractory angina.

Impact of External Counterpulsation Treatment on Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations in Refractory Angina Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Patients with refractory angina and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction exert an enormous burden on health care resources primarily because of the number of recurrent emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy has emerged as a treatment option for patients with angina and LV dysfunction and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and LV function. Improvements in symptoms and laboratory assessments in these patients, however, do not necessarily correlate with a reduction in ED visits and hospitalizations. This is the first study to assess the impact of EECP therapy on ED visits and hospitalization rates at 6-month follow-up. This prospective cohort study included 450 patients with LV dysfunction (ejection fraction <or=40%) treated with EECP therapy for refractory angina. Clinical outcomes, number of all-cause ED visits, and hospitalizations within the 6 months before EECP therapy were compared with those at 6-month follow-up. Despite the unfavorable risk profile, refractory angina patients with LV dysfunction achieved a substantial reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalization rates at 6-month follow-up. EECP therapy appears to offer an effective adjunctive treatment option for this group of patients.

Enhanced External Counterpulsation Reduces Lung/Heart Ratio at Stress in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a recently approved treatment modality for patients with angina and heart failure. However, the efficacy of EECP on left ventricular (LV) function has not been well established. The study was aimed to determine whether EECP leads to an improvement in objective parameters of LV function. Patients with coronary artery disease (n = 10) who showed evidence of stress-induced myocardial ischemia despite conventional medical or surgical therapies were enrolled and received EECP therapy for a total of 35 h. The therapeutic effects of EECP were examined by thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (201Tl-SPECT). Compared with baseline, the lung/heart ratio at stress decreased significantly from 0.40 +/- 0.08 to 0.35 +/- 0.08 (p = 0.001) at 1 month and 0.33 +/- 0.10 (p = 0.03) at 6 months following EECP treatment. LV ejection fraction marginally improved from 56.7 +/- 7.7% to 57.6 +/- 5.9% (p = 0.382) at 1 month and to 60.1 +/- 8.6% (p = 0.062) at 6 months after EECP therapy, although not statistically significant. We concluded that EECP improved LV function, shown as the reduction of lung/heart ratio at stress, in patients with coronary artery disease, up to 6 months after EECP treatment.

Effectiveness of repeat enhanced external counterpulsation for refractory angina in patients failing to complete an initial course of therapy

AIMS

This study examined the causes and results of retreatment of patients who failed to complete an initial 35-hour Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) course.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 2,311 successive angina patients from the International EECP Patient Registry were analyzed, 86.5% completed their EECP course (Complete cohort). Of the 13.5% patients failing to complete the initial course (Incomplete cohort), 28.3% had repeat EECP within 1 year vs. 10.1% of the Complete group. The predictors of failure to complete the initial course of EECP were: female gender, heart failure, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and use of nitroglycerin. For the Complete group, 83.4% had a reduction of at least one Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class after their initial EECP course, vs. 21.7% in the Incomplete group (p < 0.001). After repeat treatment, 66.2% of the Incomplete group achieved at least one CCS class reduction vs. 69.4% of the Complete group (p = NS) undergoing retreatment. The independent predictors for those who return to successfully complete their second course were patients who stopped their first course because of clinical events, and candidacy for coronary artery bypass grafting at the time of initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of retreatment of those who failed to complete their initial EECP course were comparable to those who completed their initial treatment, with similar reductions of CCS angina class.

Enhanced external counterpulsation improves exercise tolerance in patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVES

The PEECH (Prospective Evaluation of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Congestive Heart Failure) study assessed the benefits of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

Enhanced external counterpulsation reduced angina symptoms and extended time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease, angina, and normal left ventricular function. A small pilot study and registry analysis suggested benefits in patients with HF.

METHODS

We randomized 187 subjects with mild-to-moderate symptoms of HF to either EECP and protocol-defined pharmacologic therapy (PT) or PT alone. Two co-primary end points were pre-defined: the percentage of subjects with a 60 s or more increase in exercise duration and the percentage of subjects with at least 1.25 ml/min/kg increase in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2) at 6 months.

RESULTS

By the primary intent-to-treat analysis, 35% of subjects in the EECP group and 25% of control subjects increased exercise time by at least 60 s (p = 0.016) at 6 months. However, there was no between-group difference in peak VO2 changes. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class improved in the active treatment group at 1 week (p < 0.01), 3months (p < 0.02), and 6 months (p < 0.01). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure score improved significantly 1 week (p < 0.02) and 3 months after treatment (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized, single-blinded study, EECP improved exercise tolerance, quality of life, and NYHA functional classification without an accompanying increase in peak VO2.

Two-year clinical outcomes after enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy in patients with refractory angina pectoris and left ventricular dysfunction (report from The International EECP Patient Registry)

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive circulatory assist device that has recently emerged as a treatment option for refractory angina in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This 2-year cohort study describes the long-term follow-up of patients who had severe LV dysfunction that was treated with EECP for angina pectoris and reports clinical outcomes, event-free survival rates, and the incidence of repeat EECP. This study included 363 patients who had refractory angina and LV ejection fraction < or =35%. Most patients reported quality of life as poor. After completion of treatment, there was a significant decrease in severity of angina class (p < 0.001), and 72% improved from severe angina to no angina or mild angina. Fifty-two percent of patients discontinued nitroglycerin use. Quality of life improved substantially. At 2 years this decrease in angina was maintained in 55% of patients. The 2-year survival rate was 83%, and the major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival rate was 70%. Forty-three percent had no reported cardiac hospitalization; 81% had no reported congestive heart failure events. Repeat EECP was performed in 20% of these patients. The only significant independent predictor of repeat EECP in a proportional hazard model was failure to complete the first EECP treatment course (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 4.9). Improvements in angina symptoms and quality of life were maintained at 2 years. In conclusion, for patients who have high-risk LV dysfunction, EECP offers an effective, durable therapeutic approach for refractory angina. Decreased angina and improvement in quality of life were maintained at 2 years, with modest repeat EECP and low major cardiovascular event rates.

The effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on myocardial perfusion in patients with stable angina: a multicenter radionuclide study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) reduces angina and extends time to exercise-induced ischemia in patients with symptomatic coronary disease. One- and two-center studies and a retrospective case series reported that EECP improves myocardial perfusion in stable angina pectoris. We sought to critically evaluate and quantify the effect of EECP on myocardial perfusion.

METHODS

In 6 US university hospitals, EECP was performed for 35 hours in patients with class II to IV angina who had exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Symptom-limited quantitative gated technetium Tc 99m sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography exercise perfusion imaging was performed at baseline and 1 month post-EECP. Sestamibi was injected at the same heart rate in both stress tests. Single photon emission computed tomography images were read at a blinded core laboratory.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled, 34 of whom completed pre- and post-EECP stress testing. The mean age was 61 +/- 10 years, 81% were male, 78% had prior revascularization, and 68% had 3-vessel disease. The mean angina class decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.7 at baseline to 1.7 +/- 0.7 after EECP (P < .001). Exercise duration increased from 9.1 +/- 3.7 minutes at baseline to 10.2 +/- 3.6 minutes post-EECP (P = .03). The average percentage of tracer uptake, magnitude of reversibility, average thickening fraction, and the left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged after EECP.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm previous report that EECP reduces angina and improves exercise capacity. There were no significant changes in mean defect magnitude, amount of reversibility, thickening fraction, and ejection fraction measured using myocardial quantitative single photon emission computed tomography imaging when compared at identical pre- and post-EECP heart rates.

Frequency and efficacy of repeat enhanced external counterpulsation for stable angina pectoris (from the International EECP Patient Registry)

We assessed the frequency, efficacy, predictors, and long-term success of repeat enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy in relieving angina in a large cohort of patients who had chronic angina pectoris and had undergone a full course of EECP. Within 2 years of the initial course of EECP, the rate of repeat EECP was 18%, which occurred at a mean interval of 378 days after initial EECP. Of those who underwent repeat EECP, 70% had a decrease of >/=1 angina class at the end of repeat EECP with similar decreases in nitroglycerin use.

A new treatment modality in heart failure enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP)

Heart failure remains a significant health problem in the United States and in the world. Despite a surfeit of recent diagnostic and therapeutic advances, patients with heart failure remain inadequately helped. The overwhelming need for new and better therapies continues to stimulate scientists to investigate new technologies. Over the past several years the use of enhanced external counterpulsation as a treatment for chronic angina has steadily increased. Recently, its potential role in heart failure management has been shown. We review the role of enhanced external counterpulsation in heart failure management as an emerging noninvasive outpatient therapy.

Two-year outcomes after enhanced external counterpulsation for stable angina pectoris (from the International EECP Patient Registry [IEPR])

We assessed the long-term outcomes of enhanced external counterpulsation in relieving angina and improving the quality of life in a large cohort of patients with chronic angina pectoris. Seventy-three percent had a reduction by > or =1 angina class at the end of treatment, and 50% reported an improvement in the quality-of-life assessment after enhanced external counterpulsation; these results were sustained at 2-year follow-up.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in the management of angina in the elderly

This study was undertaken to determine whether enhanced external counterpulsation is a safe and effective treatment for angina in octogenarians. In this prospective observational study, demographic and clinical outcome data on patients consecutively enrolled in the International EECP Patient Registry was examined. Of the 3037 patients analyzed, 249 (8%) were >/=80 years old. Octogenarians were more likely to be female and have a history of congestive heart failure (41% vs. 29%; p<0.001). They were less likely to have had previous revascularization. Fewer patients in the octogenarian group (76% vs. 84%; p<0.01) completed a course of treatment. Of those octogenarian patients who completed treatment, 76% reported a reduction in angina and quality of life improved significantly. Adverse events related to treatment were low. At 6-month follow-up, 81% reported maintenance of angina improvement. Thus, enhanced external counterpulsation is a low-risk intervention that offers octogenarians the ability to return to more normal activity and a better quality of life.

Enhanced external counterpulsation as treatment for chronic angina in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a report from the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR)

The International Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) Patient Registry tracks acute and long-term outcome for consecutive patients treated for chronic angina. Although EECP has previously been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for angina, little information is available on its use in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This report compares the acute outcome and 6-month follow-up for a group of patients with severe LV dysfunction and a group of patients without LV dysfunction. Of 1,402 patients in the registry recruited in 1998-1999 who had recorded values of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline, 1,090 (77.7%) had preserved LV function (LVEF >35%) and 312 (22.3%) had LV dysfunction (LVEF </=35%). Six-month follow-up was available on 84% of these patients. Pre-EECP patients with LV dysfunction had a longer history of coronary artery disease (12.9 years vs. 9.1 years; p<0.001), a higher rate of congestive heart failure (60.6% vs. 20.1%; p<0.001) and myocardial infarction (83.5% vs. 61.9%; p<0.001). Patients with LV dysfunction had more severe pre-EECP angina, with 86.2% presenting with Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III/IV vs. 73.6%; p<0.01. Patients with LV dysfunction, consistent with their more severe baseline profile, suffered more adverse events (death, unstable angina, and exacerbation of heart failure) during the treatment period and were less likely to complete the full course. Immediately post-EECP, angina decreased by at least one class in 67.8% of patients with LV dysfunction (vs. 76.2%; p<0.01), and 35.9% of LV dysfunction patients vs. 39.0% had discontinued nitroglycerin use (p=ns). At 6-month follow-up, patients with LV dysfunction showed higher rates of death (9.3% vs. 2.2%; p<0.001) and exacerbation of congestive heart failure (9.9% vs. 3.7%; p<0.001). Rates of the composite outcome of death/myocardial infarction/coronary artery bypass grafting/percutaneous coronary intervention (15.4% vs. 8.3%; p<0.001) were also higher for patients with LV dysfunction. However, patients not reporting such an event showed maintenance of their improved anginal status, with 81% of LV dysfunction vs. 83.8% of patients without LV dysfunction (p=ns) reporting angina at 6 months equal to or less severe than immediately post-EECP, and nitroglycerin use was still reduced at 46.1% for LV dysfunction vs. 37.4% (p<0.05). The rate of event-free angina maintenance at 6 months was 67.0% for patients with LV dysfunction and 70.6% of patients with preserved LV function (p=ns). Patients with LV dysfunction achieved a less robust reduction in angina than did those without LV dysfunction. For the majority of the patients in the registry, this reduction was maintained at 6 months.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with heart failure: a multicenter feasibility study

To assess the feasibility of using enhanced external counterpulsation to treat patients with heart failure, 26 patients with stable heart failure (New York Heart Association classes II-III), with a left ventricular ejection fraction at or below 35%, and without fluid overload, were treated with enhanced external counterpulsation (1 hour daily, 5 days a week, to a total of 35 hours). Patients were followed for 6 months after completing the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. The primary parameter was safety as reflected by adverse events or by changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary end points included changes in exercise capacity and quality of life. There were no clinically significant problems associated with the administration of enhanced external counterpulsation. Significant improvements were seen in exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake and exercise duration), and in quality of life assessments, at 1 week and 6 months after the course of enhanced external counterpulsation. This study suggests that enhanced external counterpulsation is safe and well tolerated in patients with stable heart failure, and that a randomized, controlled study of enhanced external counterpulsation in these patients is warranted.

Comparison of patients undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation and percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina pectoris

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) has recently emerged as a treatment option for angina in selected patients suitable for revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We compared baseline characteristics and 1-year outcome in 2 cohorts of PCI candidates presenting with stable symptoms: 323 patients treated with EECP in the International EECP Patient Registry (IEPR), and 448 NHLBI Dynamic Registry patients treated with elective PCI. Compared with patients receiving PCI, IEPR patients had a higher prevalence of many risk factors including prior PCI (53.0% vs 33.3%, p <0.001), prior coronary artery bypass grafting (42.1% vs 18.6%, p <0.001), prior myocardial infarction (56.4% vs 27.8%, p <0.001), history of congestive heart failure (16.8% vs 9.2%, p <0.01), and history of diabetes (37.9% vs 23.5%, p <0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was lower among IEPR patients (mean 50.3% vs 59.2%, p <0.001). At 1 year, survival was comparable in the 2 cohorts (98.7% IEPR vs 96.8% PCI, p = NS), as were rates of coronary artery bypass grafting during follow-up (4.5% IEPR vs 5.7% PCI, p = NS). At 1 year, 43.7% of IEPR patients reported no anginal symptoms compared with 73.4% of Dynamic Registry patients (p <0.001). Rates of severe symptoms (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III, IV, or unstable) at 1 year were 15.5% among IEPR patients and 9.5% in the Dynamic Registry (p = 0.02). PCI candidates suitable for and treated with EECP had 1-year major event rates comparable to patients receiving elective PCI. Although PCI was associated with substantially lower rates of 1-year symptoms, EECP may be a safe treatment option for selected patients with obstructive coronary disease.

Benefit and safety of enhanced external counterpulsation in treating coronary artery disease patients with a history of congestive heart failure

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is used to noninvasively treat refractory angina patients, including those with a history of heart failure. The International EECP Patient Registry was used to examine the benefit and safety of EECP treatment, including a 6-month follow-up, in 1,957 patients, 548 with a history of heart failure. The heart failure cohort was older, with more females, a greater duration of coronary artery disease, more prior infarcts and revascularizations. Significantly fewer heart failure patients completed the course of EECP, and exacerbation of heart failure was more frequent, though overall major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction, revascularization) during treatment were not significantly different. The angina class improved in 68%, with comparable quality of life benefit, in the heart failure cohort. At 6 months, patients with congestive heart failure maintained their reduction in angina but were significantly more likely to have experienced a MACE end point.

The incidence and significance of myocardial bridge in a prospectively defined population of patients undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain

Since its first description in 1922, the incidence and pathophysiologic significance of myocardial bridges has remained controversial due to the relatively small size and retrospective design of most studies. We assessed the incidence and clinical consequence of myocardial bridges in 2547 patients undergoing coronary arteriography over a 16-month period at our medical center. Of the 511 patients without fixed coronary obstruction, 26 (5%) were found to have myocardial bridge. Of the 26 patients only 1 demonstrated ischemia as assessed by Tc-99m MIBI myocardial perfusion scintigraphy during treadmill exercise testing in the distribution of the culprit lesion. Therefore, the results of the present study suggest that angiographically detectable myocardial bridges are uncommon in patients undergoing routine angiography and are associated with ischemia in only one patient.

Effect of inotrope withdrawal on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the vesnarinone trial withdrawal substudy. Vest Withdrawal Substudy Group

BACKGROUND

The use of inotropic agents in the therapy of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is controversial. One concern regarding inotropic therapy has been that drug withdrawal could be associated with a worsening of symptoms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We took advantage of the discontinuation of the recent trial of vesnarinone in the therapy of CHF to assess the effects of withdrawal of the inotropic agent, vesnarinone, in patients with chronic CHF who had been randomized to receive either placebo or 30 or 60 mg of vesnarinone. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, withdrawal of vesnarinone did not impact on either morbidity or mortality over a period of 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Although these results suggest vesnarinone withdrawal is safe, the applicability of these results to other inotropic agents remains unclear.

Enhanced external counterpulsation in the management of patients with cardiovascular disease

Studies over the past several decades support the hypothesis that enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) can provide long-term benefits in patients with angina secondary to chronic coronary disease. Numerous non-sham controlled trials have recently been substantiated by a multicenter, randomized trial. Although the mechanism by which this mechanical treatment effects an alteration in cellular processes within the myocardium remains unclear, recent scientific investigations suggest that shear stress induced by chronic exposure to EECP might result in the release of a variety of growth factors and the subsequent stimulation of angiogenesis in the coronary beds. Ongoing clinical trials in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction, an international registry, and additional clinical trials may help to elucidate further the role of this novel and unique therapy in our clinical armamentarium.