Comparative beneficial effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on cardiac allograft rejection and survival

Frequency of screening for cardiac allograft vasculopathy: warranty period of initial low risk positron emission tomography

AIMS

The short-term risk of moderate-severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after a low-risk positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is unknown, and therefore, there is no guidance on how frequently to perform screening. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of progression to moderate-severe CAV as part of an annual screening programme.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with no history of CAV 2/3 and a low-risk result on initial screening PET/CT (CAV 0/1) were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome was the progression to CAV 2/3 as part of an annual screening programme (within 6-18 months of initial scan). PET CAV results were graded according to a published and externally validated diagnostic criterion for CAV. Over the study period, 231 patients underwent an initial PET/CT and had a subsequent evaluation for CAV. In this cohort, 4.3% of patients progressed to CAV 2/3 at a median of 374 days (interquartile range 363-433). Initial PET CAV grade was the most significant patient characteristic associated with the progression of CAV, with 17% of patients with PET CAV 1 progressing to CAV 2/3 compared with 1.6% with PET CAV 0 (odds ratio 12.4, 95% confidence interval 3.06-50.3).

CONCLUSION

The rate of progression to moderate-severe CAV at 1 year after the lowest-risk PET/CT is low, but approximately 1/6 patients with PET CAV 1 progress to CAV 2/3. Annual screening with PET/CT for select patients with PET CAV 0 may not be warranted. The optimal screening interval awaits confirmation of our findings in multi-centre registries.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Trends and the Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation

Background

Unlike the relationship with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, that between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is unclear. Our objectives were to characterize lipid profiles early after heart transplantation (HT) and evaluate the relationship between early LDL-C and the development of CAV.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults who underwent HT at 2 centres during the time period 2010-2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of angiographic CAV. The relationship between LDL-C and CAV was assessed using Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models adjusted a priori for clinically important covariates, including recipient and donor age, recipient sex, ischemic time, and pre-HT diabetes.

Results

A total of 386 patients followed for a median (range) of 4.4 (2.8-6.8) years were included. LDL-C at baseline (2.11 ± 0.86 mmol/L) and 1 year after HT (2.20 ± 0.88 mmol/L) was similar (P = 0.21), but it was lower at the end of follow-up (1.89 ± 0.74 mmol/L, P < 0.01). Of 309 patients who underwent angiography, 54% had CAV. The risk of CAV did not vary according to baseline, 1-year, or change from baseline to 1-year LDL-C. The odds of CAV at 1 year were equally likely across LDL-C values (adjusted odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.63 for baseline, and adjusted odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-2.10 for 1-year LDL-C).

Conclusions

No association was identified between early LDL-C and the development of CAV. Our findings do not support targeting a specific LDL-C for patients who do not otherwise meet criteria for guideline-recommended LDL-C target levels. Randomized studies are warranted to determine if lipid-lowering to a specific LDL-C target level modifies the risk of CAV.

Statin intensity and risk for cardiovascular events after heart transplantation

AIMS

Statins improve survival and reduce rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation (HT). The impact of different statin intensities on clinical outcomes has never been assessed. We set out to determine the impact of statin exposure on cardiovascular outcomes after HT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective study of 346 adult patients who underwent HT from 2006 to 2018. Statin intensity was determined longitudinally after HT based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the time to the first primary event defined as the composite of heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included time to significant rejection and time to moderate-severe cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Adverse events were evaluated for subjects on high-intensity statin therapy. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between clinical variables, statin intensity, and outcomes. Most subjects were treated with low-intensity statin therapy although this declined from 89.9% of the population at 1month after HT to 42.8% at 5years after HT. History of ischaemic cardiomyopathy, significant acute rejection, older donor age, and lesser statin intensity (p ≤ 0.001) were associated with reduced time to the primary outcome in a multivariable Cox model. Greater intensity of statin therapy was most beneficial early after HT. There were no statin-related adverse events for the 14 subjects on high-intensity statin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater statin intensity was associated with a reduction in adverse cardiovascular outcomes after HT.

Statins with different lipophilic indices exert distinct effects on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle

AIMS

Data concerning the influence of statin lipophilicity on the myotoxic and pleiotropic effects of statins is conflicting, and mechanistic head-to-head comparison studies evaluating this parameter are limited. In order to address the disparity, this mechanistic investigation aimed to assess the effects of two short-acting statins with different lipophilic indices on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle physiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Young female Wistar rats were randomised to simvastatin (80 mg kg^-1 day^-1), pravastatin (160 mg kg^-1 day^-1) or control treatment groups. Changes in functional muscle performance were assessed, as well as mRNA levels of genes relating to atrophy, hypertrophy, mitochondrial function and/or oxidative stress.

KEY FINDINGS

There were no significant differences in the mRNA profiles of isolated skeletal muscles amongst the treatment groups. In terms of skeleletal muscle performance, simvastatin reduced functionality but treatment with pravastatin significantly improved force production. Rodents given simvastatin demonstrated comparable myocardial integrity to the control group. Conversely, pravastatin reduced left ventricular action potential duration, diastolic stiffness and Mhc-β expression. Pravastatin improved endothelium-dependent relaxation, particularly in muscular arteries, but this effect was absent in the simvastatin-treated rats. The responsiveness of isolated blood vessels to noradrenaline also differed between the statin groups. The findings of this study support that the effects of statins on skeletal, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle vary with their lipophilic indices.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this work have important implications for elucidating the mechanisms responsible for the myotoxic and pleiotropic effects of statins.

Statin Safety and Associated Adverse Events: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

One in 4 Americans >40 years of age takes a statin to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other complications of atherosclerotic disease. The most effective statins produce a mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of 55% to 60% at the maximum dosage, and 6 of the 7 marketed statins are available in generic form, which makes them affordable for most patients. Primarily using data from randomized controlled trials, supplemented with observational data where necessary, this scientific statement provides a comprehensive review of statin safety and tolerability. The review covers the general patient population, as well as demographic subgroups, including the elderly, children, pregnant women, East Asians, and patients with specific conditions such as chronic disease of the kidney and liver, human immunodeficiency viral infection, and organ transplants. The risk of statin-induced serious muscle injury, including rhabdomyolysis, is <0.1%, and the risk of serious hepatotoxicity is ≈0.001%. The risk of statin-induced newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus is ≈0.2% per year of treatment, depending on the underlying risk of diabetes mellitus in the population studied. In patients with cerebrovascular disease, statins possibly increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; however, they clearly produce a greater reduction in the risk of atherothrombotic stroke and thus total stroke, as well as other cardiovascular events. There is no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between statins and cancer, cataracts, cognitive dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, or tendonitis. In US clinical practices, roughly 10% of patients stop taking a statin because of subjective complaints, most commonly muscle symptoms without raised creatine kinase. In contrast, in randomized clinical trials, the difference in the incidence of muscle symptoms without significantly raised creatinine kinase in statin-treated compared with placebo-treated participants is <1%, and it is even smaller (0.1%) for patients who discontinued treatment because of such muscle symptoms. This suggests that muscle symptoms are usually not caused by pharmacological effects of the statin. Restarting statin therapy in these patients can be challenging, but it is important, especially in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events, for whom prevention of these events is a priority. Overall, in patients for whom statin treatment is recommended by current guidelines, the benefits greatly outweigh the risks.

Hyperlipidemia and Allograft Rejection

Purpose of review

Advances in the development of immunosuppressive drug regimens have led to impressive survival rates in the year following organ transplantation. However rates of long-term graft dysfunction remain undesirably high. Recently it has been shown that co-morbidities in the patient population may affect graft survival. In mouse models, hyperlipidemia, a co-morbidity present in the majority of cardiac transplant patients, can significantly alter T cell responses to cardiac and skin allografts, and accelerate graft rejection. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of how alterations in lipids affect immune function and graft survival.

Recent Findings

Recent work in humans has highlighted the importance of controlling low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels in transplant recipients to reduce the development of chronic allograft vasculopathy (CAV). High serum levels of cholesterol containing particles leads to extensive immune system changes to T cell proliferation, differentiation and suppression. Changes in B cell subsets, and the ability of antigen presenting cells to stimulate T cells in hyperlipidemic animals may also contribute to increased organ allograft rejection.

Summary

Cholesterol metabolism is a critical cellular pathway for proper control of immune cell homeostasis and activation. Increasing evidence in both human, and in mouse models shows that elevated levels of serum cholesterol can have profound impact on the immune system. Hyperlipidemia has been shown to increase T cell activation, alter the development of T helper subsets, increase the inflammatory capacity of antigen presenting cells (APC) and significantly accelerate graft rejection in several models.

Timing of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor initiation and allograft vasculopathy progression and outcomes in heart transplant recipients

Aims

Early studies from the 1990s have shown that statins improve survival and attenuate cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). However, little contemporary data are available on the incremental benefit of statins with the current use of new‐generation immunosuppressive agents and the use of coronary intravascular ultrasound for assessment of CAV. We sought to investigate the effect of early statin (ES) as compared with late statin (LS) initiation after heart transplantation (HT) on long‐term CAV progression and clinical outcomes in a large contemporary HT cohort.

Methods and results

We analysed a cohort of 409 adult HT recipients. CAV progression was assessed by serial coronary intravascular ultrasound volumetric measurements of the differences between baseline and last follow‐up plaque volume (PV) and plaque index (PV/vessel volume ratio). CAV progression and clinical outcomes were compared between the ES (<2 years after HT) and the LS (>2 years after HT) groups. During a median follow‐up of 8.2 years, ES resulted in significantly lower change (Δ) of plaque index (+3.8% ± 1.7% vs. +8.2% ± 3.6%; P = 0.0008) and PV (+0.8 ± 0.3 vs. +1.9 ± 1.2; P = 0.045) compared with LS group. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model and after adjustment for baseline characteristics, ES was associated with a 52% decreased risk of CAV‐associated events (hazard ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval: 0.27–0.91; P = 0.025) and a 42% decreased risk of the composite endpoint of all‐cause mortality and CAV‐associated events (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.38–0.91; P = 0.019).

Conclusions

Early initiation of statin therapy after HT results in attenuated CAV progression as well as in decreased CAV‐related events and mortality.

Effect of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors on the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Lung transplant recipients (LRs) have a reduced median 5-year survival of approximately 55% primarily due to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Statins have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that may facilitate CLAD prevention. This study sought to evaluate statin effect on CLAD development. Adult bilateral LRs from January 2004 to October 2013 were included. Statin group included recipients with early statin use and continued for minimum 6 months. Propensity score matching was performed for age, gender, and native lung disease to select matched nonstatin group. Competing risk approach was used to evaluate statin effect on CLAD development at 3 years while controlling for acute rejection and CMV pneumonitis. A total of 130 patients were included in each group. CLAD cumulative incidence at 3 years for statin and nonstatin groups was 20.6% (CI: 11.8%-33.5%) and 22.4% (CI: 12.2%-27.3%). Statin use was not associated with a decreased risk of CLAD (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55-1.59, P = .80) but was associated with a decreased risk of death (SHR: 0.45, CI: 0.22-0.90, P = .024). At 3 years, patient survival was 81.7% in statin group and 68.3% in nonstatin group (P = .012). Statins did not significantly delay the time to development of CLAD in LR but did demonstrate a benefit in patient survival.

Impact of hyperlipidemia on alloimmunity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hyperlipidemia is a comorbidity affecting a significant number of transplant patients despite treatment with cholesterol lowering drugs. Recently, it has been shown that hyperlipidemia can significantly alter T-cell responses to cardiac allografts in mice, and graft rejection is accelerated in dyslipidemic mice. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of hyperlipidemia in graft rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hyperlipidemic mice have significant increases in serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and neutralization of interleukin 17 (IL-17) slows graft rejection, suggesting that IL-17 production by Th17 cells was necessary but not sufficient for rejection. Hyperlipidemia also causes an increase in alloreactive T-cell responses prior to antigen exposure. Analysis of peripheral tolerance mechanisms indicated that this was at least in part due to alterations in FoxP3 T cells that led to reduced Treg function and the expansion of FoxP3 CD4 T cells expressing low levels of CD25. Functionally, alterations in Treg function prevented the ability to induce operational tolerance to fully allogeneic heart transplants through costimulatory-molecule blockade, a strategy that requires Tregs.

SUMMARY

These findings highlight the importance of considering the contribution of inflammatory comorbidities to cardiac allograft rejection, and point to the potential importance of managing hyperlipidemia in the transplant population.

Impact of Statin Use After Heart Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although various studies revealed the beneficial effects of statins in post-cardiac transplant patients, these were relatively small and low-powered studies. We performed a meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the role of statins in post-cardiac transplant patients, specifically examining the effects on hemodynamically significant/fatal graft rejection, coronary vasculopathy, terminal cancer, and overall survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed, Cochran CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases using the search terms "cardiac transplant" or "heart transplant," and "statin" for a literature search. A random-effects model with Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool the data. We identified 10 studies, 4 randomized controlled trials, and 6 nonrandomized studies, which compared outcomes in heart transplant recipients undergoing statin therapy to statin-naive patients. A pooled analysis of 9 studies reporting mortality revealed that the use of statins was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.35; P<0.0001). Statins also decreased the odds of hemodynamically significant/fatal rejection (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.65; P=0.0005), incidence of coronary vasculopathy (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.68; P=0.003), and terminal cancer (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.63; P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from a pooled analysis suggests that statins improve survival in heart transplant recipients. Statins may prevent fatal rejection episodes, decrease terminal cancer risk, and reduce the incidence of coronary vasculopathy. Additional prospective studies are needed to further investigate and explain this association.

New developments for the detection and treatment of cardiac vasculopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major limitation to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Innovative new techniques to diagnose CAV have been applied to detect disease. This review will examine the current diagnostic and treatment options available to clinicians for CAV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnostic modalities addressing the pathophysiology underlying CAV (arterial wall thickening and decreased coronary blood flow) improve diagnostic sensitivity when compared to traditional (angiography and dobutamine stress echocardiography) techniques.

SUMMARY

Limited options are available to prevent and treat CAV; however, progress has been made in making an earlier and more accurate diagnosis. Future research is needed to identify the optimal time to modify immunosuppression and investigate novel treatments for CAV.

Clinical Pharmacist Patient-Safety Initiative to Reduce Against-Label Prescribing of Statins With Cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

Against-label prescribing of statins with interacting drugs, such as cyclosporine, represents an important patient safety concern.

OBJECTIVE

To implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical pharmacist patient-safety initiative to minimize against-label prescribing of statins with cyclosporine.

METHODS

Kaiser Permanente Colorado clinical pharmacists identified patients receiving both cyclosporine and against-label statin through prescription claims data. Academic detailing on this interaction was provided to health care providers. Clinical pharmacists collaborated with physicians to facilitate conversion to on-label statin. Conversion rates along with changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 157 patients identified as taking cyclosporine, 48 were receiving concurrent statin therapy. Of these 48 patients, 33 (69%) were on an against-label statin regimen; 25 (76%) of these patients were converted to on-label statin. Overall, patients converted to on-label statin had a mean LDL-C prior to conversion of 82.9 (±26.4) mg/dL and mean LDL-C after conversion of 90.7 (±31.2) mg/dL ( P = 0.21). In all, 17 patients (68%) were switched to pravastatin 20 mg daily and 8 patients (32%) to rosuvastatin 5 mg daily. In patients converted to pravastatin 20 mg daily, the mean LDL-C was 13.5 mg/dL higher than prior to conversion ( P = 0.066). In patients converted to rosuvastatin 5 mg daily, the mean LDL-C was 3.8 mg/dL lower than prior to conversion ( P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Utilizing a patient-safety-centered approach, clinical pharmacists were able to reduce the number of patients on against-label statin with cyclosporine while maintaining a comparable level of LDL-C control.

Medication management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a common complication following heart transplantation (HT), resulting in diminished graft survival. The preferred strategy for preventing CAV is optimal medical management; however, for patients who develop CAV, delaying disease progression through effective medication management is equally important. A review of the literature regarding medication management of CAV was conducted via a search of the MEDLINE database. Studies were included if they were published in English, conducted in humans ≥ 18 years of age or older, and used noninvestigational medications. Immunosuppressive medications such as the antiproliferative mycophenolate, the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, and the proliferation signal inhibitors sirolimus and everolimus have been shown to prevent the development of CAV. Certain cardiovascular medications, such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), gemfibrozil, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, have also demonstrated efficacy in preventing this disease process. Prevention of CAV has also been observed with prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection and antioxidant medications. Despite being commonly used in HT patients, neither antiplatelet agents nor glycemic control have proved effective at preventing CAV. Only sirolimus has been shown to arrest the progress of existing CAV.

The effect of statins on cardiac allograft survival

PURPOSE

In addition to having a lipid-lowering effect, statins also have an anti-inflammatory effect that may reduce allograft dysfunction by preventing cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and play an immunomodulatory role. We studied the effect of statins on cardiac allograft survival at the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the patients undergoing heart transplantation at NTUH in the last 6 years. After transplantation, all patients received biochemical monitoring every month and echocardiographic examination regularly at NTUH. Protocol biopsy was performed in all except 18 pediatric patients. All patients received immunosuppressants, including tacrolimus or cyclosporine, everolimus or mycophenolate acid, and prednisolone. They were divided into statin and nonstatin groups according to whether or not a statin was taken.

RESULTS

At NTUH, from 2007 to 2012, 168 heart transplantations were performed. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 to 74 years old with male predominance. The etiology was mainly dilated cardiomyopathy (52.4%) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (39.3%), including 7 retransplantations from severe CAV with heart failure. Twenty-three patients (17%) suffered from acute rejection. The overall 1-year actuarial survival rate was 86% ± 2% and the 5-year survival rate was 79% ± 3%. Seventy-eight patients (57.4%) took statins and the statin group has a better 5-year survival rate and freedom from cardiac death survival rate (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that the use of statins after transplantation was associated with better survival.

Long-term mortality after cardiac allograft vasculopathy: implications of percutaneous intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the prognosis of patients with proximal cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) treated with percutaneous intervention (PCI) to the prognosis of those with severe CAV not amenable to PCI.

BACKGROUND

CAV is a progressive form of arterial narrowing affecting patients with orthotopic heart transplants (OHTs). PCI has been used to treat patients with focal CAV, but its efficacy remains unclear.

METHODS

Of 853 patients undergoing OHT and subsequent coronary angiographies at the Cleveland Clinic, all patients with at least moderate CAV (>30%) on any coronary angiogram following OHT were included. Of remaining patients with no/mild CAV, 200 patients were randomly chosen to represent the comparison group. All angiograms of the included patients were reviewed and graded according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) nomenclature.

RESULTS

Of the 393 included patients, 100 patients underwent definitive intervention for CAV. Of these 100 patients, 90 patients underwent PCI only, 6 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and 4 patients underwent repeat OHT. We observed a progressive increase in long-term mortality with worsening CAV. Patients with ISHLT grade 3 CAV had the highest long-term mortality compared with other groups. In addition, there was a significant reduction in the risk for mortality at 2-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08 to 0.82) and 5-year follow-up (adjusted odds ratio: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.93) after PCI compared with patients diagnosed with ISHLT grade 3 CAV, who were deemed unsuitable for PCI. Furthermore, statin use was associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with CAV (hazard ratio: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Worsening severity of CAV was associated with progressively worse long-term survival among heart transplant recipients. Among patients with CAV, long-term survival in those with CAV amenable to PCI was greater than that in those with severe CAV not treatable with PCI.

Statins impair survival of primary human mesenchymal progenitor cells via mevalonate depletion, NF-κB signaling, and Bnip3

Circulating progenitor cells of bone marrow origin have been implicated in transplant cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and cardiac fibrosis. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, called "statins," have been shown to impair the progression of CAV and improve patient survival. We examined the in vitro effects of three HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin on the viability of MSCs and expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from human patients were treated with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin at 0.1, 1.0, or 10 μM ± mevalonate. Human MSC treatment with 1 and 10 μM simvastatin or atorvastatin resulted in progressively reduced cell viability, which was associated with a decline in NF-κB p65. Viability was rescued by co-incubation with mevalonate or by pretreatment with Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta (Iκκ-β). Pravastatin did not affect MSC viability or NF-κB expression. Mevalonate depletion through HMG-CoA reductase inhibition impairs the viability of primary human MSC through down-regulating NF-κB.

Assessment of lipophilic vs. hydrophilic statin therapy in acute myocardial infarction – ALPS-AMI study

BACKGROUND

Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events, but no randomized trial has investigated the best statins for secondary prevention. We compared the efficacy of hydrophilic pravastatin with that of lipophilic atorvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective, multicenter study enrolled 508 patients (410 men; mean age, 66.0 ± 11.6 years) with AMI who were randomly assigned to atorvastatin (n=255) or pravastatin (n=253). The target control level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was <100 mg/dl, and patients were followed for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the composite of death due to any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, unstable angina or congestive heart failure requiring hospital admission, or any type of coronary revascularization. The primary endpoint occurred in 77 patients (30.4%) and in 80 patients (31.4%) in the pravastatin and atorvastatin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.181; 95% confidence interval: 0.862-1.619; P=0.299), whereas greater reductions in serum total cholesterol and LDL-C were achieved in the atorvastatin group (P<0.001 for each). Changes in hemoglobin A1c, brain natriuretic peptide, and creatinine were not significant between the 2 regimens, and safety and treatment adherence were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

On 2-year comparison of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins there was no significant difference in prevention of secondary cardiovascular outcome.

A common rejection module (CRM) for acute rejection across multiple organs identifies novel therapeutics for organ transplantation

A set of 11 genes, termed the common rejection module, predicts acute graft rejection in solid organ transplant patients and may help to identify novel drug targets in transplantation.

Using meta-analysis of eight independent transplant datasets (236 graft biopsy samples) from four organs, we identified a common rejection module (CRM) consisting of 11 genes that were significantly overexpressed in acute rejection (AR) across all transplanted organs. The CRM genes could diagnose AR with high specificity and sensitivity in three additional independent cohorts (794 samples). In another two independent cohorts (151 renal transplant biopsies), the CRM genes correlated with the extent of graft injury and predicted future injury to a graft using protocol biopsies. Inferred drug mechanisms from the literature suggested that two FDA-approved drugs (atorvastatin and dasatinib), approved for nontransplant indications, could regulate specific CRM genes and reduce the number of graft-infiltrating cells during AR. We treated mice with HLA-mismatched mouse cardiac transplant with atorvastatin and dasatinib and showed reduction of the CRM genes, significant reduction of graft-infiltrating cells, and extended graft survival. We further validated the beneficial effect of atorvastatin on graft survival by retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of a single-center cohort of 2,515 renal transplant patients followed for up to 22 yr. In conclusion, we identified a CRM in transplantation that provides new opportunities for diagnosis, drug repositioning, and rational drug design.

Coronary collaterals predict improved survival and allograft function in patients with coronary allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the care of patients who have received cardiac transplants, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the most prevalent cause of late allograft failure and cardiac mortality. Few proven therapies are available for this important disease. The presence of coronary collaterals imparts a favorable prognosis in patients with native ischemic heart disease; however, the impact of collaterals in CAV is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To determine whether the development of coronary collaterals is associated with improved outcomes in patients with CAV, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients followed in the heart transplant program at Barnes Jewish Hospital from 1994 to 2008. The primary end points included all cause mortality and the composite of all cause mortality, retransplantation, and inotrope dependence. We screened 485 patients and identified 59 (12%) subjects with moderate-to-severe CAV. Angiographically visible coronary collaterals were present in 34 (57%) subjects. Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariable analyses revealed that patients with collaterals had reduced incidence of all cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.20; P<0.001) and the composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.17; P<0.001). In addition, patients with collaterals had less severe heart failure symptoms as measured by New York Heart Association class. Immunostaining of biopsy specimens revealed that among patients with CAV, the presence of coronary collaterals correlated with increased microvascular density, reduced fibrosis, and decreased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these data demonstrate that the presence of coronary collaterals predicts a favorable prognosis in patients with CAV and suggests that interventions aimed at promoting collateral and microvascular growth may serve as effective therapies for this disease.

Endothelial dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains a major challenge to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Endothelial injury and dysfunction, as a result of multifactorial immunologic and nonimmunologic insults in the donor and the recipient, are prevalent early after transplant and may be precursors to overt cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Current strategies for managing cardiac allograft vasculopathy, however, rely on the identification and treatment of established disease. Improved understanding of mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction in heart transplant recipients may provide the foundation for the development of sensitive screening techniques and preventive therapies.

Statins and the risk of cancer after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although newer immunosuppressive agents, such as mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors, have lowered the occurrence of malignancies after transplantation, cancer is still a leading cause of death late after heart transplantation. Statins may have an impact on clinical outcomes beyond their lipid-lowering effects. The aim of the present study was to delineate whether statin therapy has an impact on cancer risk and total mortality after heart transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 255 patients who underwent heart transplantation at the University Hospital Zurich between 1985 and 2007 and survived the first year were included in the present study. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of any malignancy; the secondary end point was overall survival. During follow-up, a malignancy was diagnosed in 108 patients (42%). The cumulative incidence of tumors 8 years after transplantation was reduced in patients receiving a statin (34% versus 13%; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.43 versus 0.07-0.18; P<0.003). Statin use was associated with improved cancer-free and overall survival (both P<0.0001). A Cox regression model that analyzed the time to tumor formation with or without statin therapy, adjusted for age, male sex, type of cardiomyopathy, and immunosuppressive therapy (including switch to mTOR inhibitors or tacrolimus), demonstrated a superior survival in the statin group. Statins reduced the hazard of occurrence of any malignancy by 67% (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.51; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is not possible to adjust for all potential confounders because of the very long follow-up period, this registry suggests that statin use is associated with improved cancer-free and overall survival after cardiac transplantation. These data will need to be confirmed in a prospective trial.

In the era of the universal use of statins dyslipidemia's are still common in heart transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Statins are used in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients to avoid acute rejection episodes (ARE) during the first year after surgery and coronary vasculopathy (CAV) thereafter as established in prospective randomized trials, yielding the grounds for the universal use of this group of drugs. The aim of the study was to describe the occurrence of dyslipidemias among OHT recipients after introduction of guidelines suggesting the use of statins in all individuals able to tolerate this therapy.

METHODS

Medical records of all OHT recipients undergoing routine clinical checkups between January and June 2010 were screened for the presence of dyslipidemia: total cholesterol>5 mmol/L; low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol>3 mmol/L; triglycerides>1.65 mmol/L; high-density lipoprotein (HDL)<1 mmol/L in the serum. The study group consisted of 322 subjects including 265 males and 57 females of overall mean age of 53.6±12 and 7±4 years after OHT. There was coronary artery disease (CAD) before OHT in 113 (35%). The average number of ARE was 1.9±1.9 and CAV was diagnosed in 77 (24%) patients. There were 247 (77%) patients on statins. We analyzed clinical, ultrasound, and biochemical evaluations to characterize subjects with dyslipidemias.

RESULTS

At least one dyslipidemia was observed among 212 (66%) including hypercholesterolemia in 121 (38%), high LDL in 135 (42%), hypertriglyceridemia in 110 (34%), and low HDL in 48 (15%) patients. The subjects with dyslipidemia were prone to be older, to have CAD before OHT, and to be hypertensive, overweight, and obese, as well as display an higher HbA1C when diabetic. They were treated less frequently with tacrolimus but showed higher drug levels, and more often were prescribed everolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite almost universal use of statins, dyslipidemias were present in 2/3 of OHT recipients. It was related to typical atherosclerotic risk factors; however, the influence of immunosuppressants seemed to also be significant.

Pharmacological actions of statins: a critical appraisal in the management of cancer

Statins, among the most commonly prescribed drugs worldwide, are cholesterol-lowering agents used to manage and prevent cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases. Recently, a multifaceted action in different physiological and pathological conditions has been also proposed for statins, beyond anti-inflammation and neuroprotection. Statins have been shown to act through cholesterol-dependent and -independent mechanisms and are able to affect several tissue functions and modulate specific signal transduction pathways that could account for statin pleiotropic effects. Typically, statins are prescribed in middle-aged or elderly patients in a therapeutic regimen covering a long life span during which metabolic processes, aging, and concomitant novel diseases, including cancer, could occur. In this context, safety, toxicity, interaction with other drugs, and the state of health have to be taken into account in subjects treated with statins. Some evidence has shown a dichotomous effect of statins with either cancer-inhibiting or -promoting effects. To date, clinical trials failed to demonstrate a reduced cancer occurrence in statin users and no sufficient data are available to define the long-term effects of statin use over a period of 10 years. Moreover, results from clinical trials performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of statins in cancer did not suggest statin use as chemotherapeutic or adjuvant agents. Here, we reviewed the pharmacology of the statins, providing a comprehensive update of the current knowledge of their effects on tissues, biological processes, and pathological conditions, and we dissected the disappointing evidence on the possible future use of statin-based drugs in cancer therapy.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: advances in diagnosis

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), characterized by diffuse intimal thickening and luminal narrowing in the arteries of the allograft, is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in cardiac transplant recipients. Many transplant centers perform routine annual surveillance coronary angiography. However, angiography can underdiagnose or miss CAV due to its diffuse nature. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is more sensitive than angiography. IVUS provides not only accurate information on lumen size, but also quantification of intimal thickening, vessel wall morphology, and composition. IVUS has evolved as a valuable adjunct to angiography and the optimal diagnostic tool for early detection. Noninvasive testing such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and nuclear stress test have shown considerable accuracy in diagnosing significant CAV. Computed tomographic imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are promising new modalities but require further study. This article reviews the diagnostic methods that are currently available.

Drug eluting versus bare metal stents in cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a distinct pathological condition characterized by diffuse and progressive arteriopathy and it is an important determinant of long-term graft survival. Definitive CAV treatment is retransplantation but palliation with stenting might temporarily alleviate it. The benefit of drug eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stents (BMS) in the treatment of such lesions is debatable. We therefore sought to do a literature search to review the available evidence comparing DES to BMS.

METHODS

We conducted Pub Med, EMBASE, Cochrane database review, Web of Science search of studies comparing DES with BMS in CAV. Available studies were retrospective in nature with either direct comparison groups (n = 5) or historical controls (n = 1). The main outcomes analyzed were in stent restenosis (ISR) during follow-up and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients from six studies were included in the review (1995-2007). Most commonly used DES were sirolimus eluting stent. DES appeared to reduce the long-term risk of ISR compared with BMS. Three of the five studies showed a statistically significant reduction in ISR at 12 months while the one study assessing ISR at 6 months showed no significant difference. Clinical endpoints such as death and major adverse cardiac events were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

DES appear to reduce the incidence of ISR in CAV as compared with BMS. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the clinical benefit of DES beyond a reduction in ISR.

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary artery for treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after orthotopic heart transplantation

The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) for the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in consecutive unselected patients with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). PCI in patients with OHT and develop CAV has been associated with greater restenosis rates compared to PCI in patients with native coronary artery disease. A paucity of short- and long-term data is available from patients with OHT who have undergone PCI for ULMCA disease. The present retrospective, multicenter, international registry included 21 patients with OHT and CAV who underwent ULMCA PCI from 1997 to 2009. Angiographic success was achieved in all patients. Drug-eluting stents were used in 14 of the 21 patients. No major adverse cardiac events or repeat OHT occurred within the first 30 days. At a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 3.2 years, 3 patients (14%) had died, myocardial infarction had occurred in 1 patient (5%), and target lesion revascularization had been required in 4 patients (19%). Follow-up angiography was performed in 16 patients (76%), and restenosis was observed in 4 (19%). No stent thrombosis of the ULMCA was observed. One patient (5%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, and 5 patients (24%) underwent repeat OHT. In conclusion, the results of our study have shown ULMCA PCI to be safe and reasonably effective in patients with OHT and represents a viable treatment strategy for CAV in these patients.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: statins not associated with improved patient or graft survival

Background

The beneficial effects of early statin use in kidney transplant recipients, especially those on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, are not well established. We evaluated the predictors of statin use following kidney transplantation and examined its association with patient and allograft survival.

Methods

We examined 615 consecutive patients who underwent kidney transplant at our institution between January 1998 and January 2002. Statin use was assessed at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following kidney transplant. Patients were followed for allograft and patient survival.

Results

36% of the 615 kidney transplant recipients were treated with statin treatment. Statin use increased over the course of the study period. Older age, elevated body mass index, higher triglyceride levels, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, history of myocardial infarction were associated with higher rates of statin use; elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and CMV IgG seropositivity were associated with less statin use. Older age, elevated BMI and hypercholesterolemia remained significant predictors of increased statin use after accounting for covariates using multiple regression. The early use of statins was not associated with improvements in unadjusted patient survival [HR 0.99; 95%CI 0.72-1.37] or graft survival [HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.24]. The risks of death and graft survival were not consistently reduced with exposure to statin using either adjusted models or propensity scores in Cox Proportional Hazards models.

Conclusions

In a kidney transplant population primarily receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, early statin use was not associated with significantly improved graft or patient survival.

Non-atheroprotective effects of statins: a systematic review

Since the introduction of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for lowering lipids, a large amount of data has been published demonstrating their potential benefits in conditions as varied as cancer, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's dementia. We reviewed the published literature on MEDLINE from articles between 1950 and 2008 on the non-atheroprotective effects of statins and noted consistent benefits of statin use in improving outcomes of ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, cardiac transplant rejection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and sepsis. However, for these conditions, the level of evidence was inadequate to recommend statin use. The evidence for improving outcomes in atrial fibrillation, mortality in heart failure, contrast-induced nephropathy, cataract, age-related macular degeneration, sub-arachnoid hemorrhage, osteoporosis, dementia, and cancer incidence was conflicting and inconclusive. Furthermore, we found that most of the literature consists of small observational studies and their conclusions are often not corroborated by results from larger or randomized studies. Pending large, well designed, randomized trials, we conclude that there is no definite evidence for the use of statins in any condition besides hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis.

[Medical complications of lung transplantation]

In 2010, lung transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for a number of patients suffering from of end-stage non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases. The patients frequently regain a very good quality of life, however, long-term survival is often hampered by the development of complications such as the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, metabolic and infectious complications. As the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the first cause of death in the medium and long term, an intense immunosuppressive treatment is maintained for life in order to prevent or stabilize this complication. The immunosuppression on the other hand induces a number of potentially severe complications including metabolic complications, infections and malignancies. The most frequent metabolic complications are arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoporosis. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are the second cause of mortality. They are to be considered as medical emergencies and require urgent assessment and targeted therapy after microbiologic specimens have been obtained. They should not, under any circumstances, be treated empirically and it has also to be kept in mind that the lung transplant recipient may present several concomitant infections. The most frequent malignancies are skin cancers, the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Kaposi's sarcoma and some types of bronchogenic carcinomas, head/neck and digestive cancers. Lung transplantation is no longer an exceptional procedure; thus, the pulmonologist will be confronted with such patients and should be able to recognize the symptoms and signs of the principal non-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to give a general overview of the most frequently encountered complications. Their assessment and treatment, though, will most often require the input of other specialists and a multidisciplinary and transversal approach.

Statins for all: the new premed?

The use of statins is widespread and many patients presenting for surgery are regularly taking them. There is evidence that statins have beneficial effects beyond those of lipid lowering, including reducing the perioperative risk of cardiac complications and sepsis. This review addresses the cellular mechanisms by which statins may produce these effects. Statins appear to have actions on vascular nitric oxide through the balance of inducible and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The clinical evidence for these benefits is also briefly reviewed with the objective of clarifying the current status of statin use in the perioperative period. There is reasonably strong evidence that patients already taking statins should continue on them perioperatively. However, the evidence for the prophylactic use of statins perioperatively is weak and lacks prospective controlled studies.

Quilty in biopsy is associated with poor prognosis after heart transplantation

We tested if Quilty (endocardial infiltration of lymphocytes) in routinely processed endomyocardial biopsy is associated with poor outcome after heart transplantation (HTx). Biopsies (n=9829) harvested within the first post-transplant year from 938 patients (778 men, mean age 49 years) were evaluated for Quilty and acute cellular rejection (according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, ISHLT, classification). Transplant vasculopathy was evaluated by coronary angiography, and severe stenosis was found in 19% of patients. Survival was tested by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses for all-cause mortality and major cardiac events (lethal acute cellular rejection, graft loss or myocardial infarction). We found 1840 (19%) Quilty-positive biopsies in 487 Quilty-positive patients (52%). Quilty was more prevalent in women (p=0.038) and younger men (p=0.001), and was correlated with ISHLT grade 1R (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.36-1.55; p<0.001) and ISHLT grade 2R (OR 2.48, 95% CI 2.21-3.41; p<0.001). Quilty in any biopsy was associated with a higher all-cause mortality (log rank p=0.045) due to a higher risk for major cardiac event (p=0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis showed Quilty (RR 1.69, 95%CI 1.05-2.73) and transplant vasculopathy (RR 2.78, 95%CI 1.68-4.61) as risk factors for major cardiac events and treated hyperlipidemia as lowering the risk for major cardiac events (RR 0.47, 95%CI 0.28-0.77). Quilty is associated with graft loss and poor outcome post HTx. Index biopsy during the first post-transplant year is a useful tool to identify patients at risk and is recommended during routine post-transplant management.

Simvastatin attenuates trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis, but not oxazalone-induced colitis

PURPOSE

To determine whether simvastatin is able to inhibit inflammation in trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced or oxazalone (OXA)-induced colitis.

RESULTS

In the prophylactic protocol, simvastatin dose-dependently suppressed the decrease in body weight and inflammatory grade of TNBS-treated mice. In contrast, in the therapeutic protocol, no significant difference in body weight reduction was observed between simvastatin-treated and control mice. IFN-gamma release from LP cells was significantly suppressed in mice receiving high-dose simvastatin in the prophylactic protocol. In contrast to TNBS colitis, even high-dose prophylactic simvastatin had no suppressive effects on either weight reduction or the inflammatory grade in OXA colitis.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that simvastatin negatively regulates inflammation in TNBS-induced colitis, but not in OXA-induced colitis. In TNBS-induced colitis, simvastatin suppressed the Th1-polarized immune response. Our findings suggest that simvastatin has potential effects as a therapeutic agent in human inflammatory bowel disease, particularly Crohn's disease.