Effects of aspirin on coronary reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis: a meta-analysis

Does Early Post-operative Administration of Aspirin Influence the Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery? A Prospective Observational Study

Background:

Aspirin has a proven role in preventing thrombotic diseases. However, given its anti-platelet activity, it is often assumed that its early post-operative administration significantly increase the amount of post-operative bleeding.

Aim:

The aim of this study was to determine whether early post-operative administration of aspirin influence the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Methods:

In a prospective observational study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing first time elective CABG surgery were include in the study. Patients received a low dose of aspirin (75-150 mg per day) either 1 hours (the early aspirin group; n=43) or 6 hours after surgery (the late aspirin group; n=57). Total mediastinal blood drainage, blood drainage after 6 hours, incidences of re-operation for the control of bleeding and transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) and blood products were recorded and followed until chest tube removal.

Results:

The groups were found to be matched for the confounding variables and no significant differences were found between post-aspirin bleeding (p=0.37), RBCs and blood product usage (p=0.90) or incidences of re-operation for control of bleeding (p=1.00) between the two groups.

Conclusions:

Early administration (1 hour after surgery) of aspirin did not appear to increase the risk of post-operative bleeding in patients undergoing CABG. Thereby, its early administration in such cases may be considered. Although further well-designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of early administration of aspirin after CABG surgery are warranted.

The effects of aspirin and ticagrelor on Toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated platelet activation: results of a randomized, cross-over trial

Platelet activation underlies the pathology of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is administered post-AMI to limit this activation. Platelets express Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1, 2, and 4 and become potently activated in response to TLR2/1 and TLR4 stimulation. However, it is unknown whether antiplatelet agents can protect against platelet activation via these TLR pathways. This study aimed to determine the extent to which TLR-mediated platelet activation can be inhibited by currently used antiplatelet agents. Ten healthy subjects were enrolled into a single-blinded randomized cross-over trial. Subjects received either aspirin monotherapy or DAPT (aspirin in combination with ticagrelor) for 1 week, were washed out, and crossed over to the other drug regimen. Platelet activation was assessed in response to Pam3CSK4 (a TLR2/1 agonist) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS; a TLR4 agonist) at baseline and after each antiplatelet drug regimen. Platelet-surface expression of CD62p and PAC1 by flow cytometry was measured as markers of platelet activation. At baseline, expression of CD62p and PAC1 increased significantly in response to high-dose LPS and in a dose-dependent manner in response to Pam3CSK4. Aspirin monotherapy did not inhibit platelet activation in response to any TLR agonist tested. DAPT with aspirin and ticagrelor only modestly inhibited expression of both activation markers in response to high doses of Pam3CSK4 and LPS. However, incubation with these TLR agonists led to substantial platelet activation despite treatment with these anti-platelet agents. Platelet-TLR2/1 and platelet-TLR4 represent intact on-treatment platelet activation pathways, which may contribute to on-going platelet activation post-AMI.

Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacology of Efegatran (LY294468) : A Novel Antithrombin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Efegatran (LY294468), a tripeptide arginal in hibitor of the catalytic site of thrombin, is being devel oped as a parenteral anticoagulant for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Efegatran was studied in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis to determine its ability to prevent thrombus formation and as an ad junctive anticoagulant to thrombolysis, in phase I clinical studies, and phase II clinical studies in unstable angina. In the preclinical in vivo studies in dogs, efegatran pro duced a dose-dependent increase in clotting times and demonstrated a selectivity for thrombin time (TT) changes. The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-TT ratio (that is, based on the dose to double each clotting time) determined in dogs from ex vivo blood samples was 8: 1. This observation was similar to that obtained during the phase I studies in normal volunteers where the APTT-TT ratio was 12:1. The canine and hu man clotting systems responded similarly at doses of efe gatran where comparisons could be made (0.25-1.0 mg/ kg/h). The kinetics of the anticoagulant activity of efega tran in dogs and humans were linear and nonsaturable over the dose ranges studied. Efegatran was also found to be an effective adjunctive anticoagulant during streptoki nase-induced thrombolysis in dogs, preventing reocclu sion without increasing bleeding risk. The novel an tithrombin, efegatran, has demonstrated dose-dependent and safe anticoagulation in animal and human studies. Efegatran is presently undergoing phase II clinical studies in unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction pa tients.

Antithrombotic Strategies in Endovascular Interventions: Current Status and Future Directions

Despite increasing numbers of endovascular interventions to treat arterial and venous disease, scant level 1 evidence is available regarding the role of antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing these procedures. The current practice in this regard is heterogeneous and has mainly been driven by data from coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. This article discusses the role of antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents for endovascular intervention.

Cardiogenic Shock: Background, Shock Trial/Registry, Evolving Data, Changing Survival, Best Medical Therapy

Cardiogenic shock remains associated with unacceptably high mortality, but recent improvements with early revascularization, continued support with pharmacologic agents, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump have led to improvements in the rate of mortality. Timely intervention with cardiac surgery in patients with mechanical complications, 3-vessel disease, and left main disease is beneficial. Continued research and ever-improving understanding of this once deadly condition have helped further in improving prognosis. Cutting-edge technologies, such as myocyte cell implantation and the use of a cooling system, will help in pushing the boundaries farther.

Platelet function profiles in patients with diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk for several cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and congestive heart failure. DM has reached epidemic proportions and its strong association with coronary artery disease is responsible for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. DM patients are characterized by platelet hyperreactivity, which contribute to the enhanced atherothrombotic risk of these subjects. Several mechanisms are involved in the hyperreactive platelet phenotype characterizing DM patients. Furthermore, a large proportion of DM patients show inadequate response to standard antiplatelet treatments and high rate of adverse recurrent cardiovascular events despite compliance with standard antiplatelet treatment regimens. Therefore, new antiplatelet treatment regimens are warranted in DM patients to reduce their atherothrombotic risk. The present manuscript provides an overview on the current status of knowledge on platelet function profiles in patients with DM and therapeutic considerations.

Role of ASA in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events

Cardiovascular disease, which includes coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral artery disease, is the leading cause of death in developed countries. Evidence from basic research, clinical investigations, observational epidemiologic studies and randomized clinical trials has provided strong support for the benefits of aspirin in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular events in a wide range of pathologies in secondary prevention. Data in primary prevention have far more uncertainties. An overview for the evidence supporting the efficacy of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is discussed, including the relative and absolute benefit and the risks of side effects. Finally, future developments in the field directed towards individualized treatment strategies and novel antiplatelet agents are examined.

Increased atherothrombotic burden in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome: a review of antiplatelet therapy

Patients with diabetes mellitus presenting with acute coronary syndrome have a higher risk of cardiovascular complications and recurrent ischemic events when compared to nondiabetic counterparts. Different mechanisms including endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and abnormalities in coagulation and fibrinolysis have been implicated for this increased atherothrombotic risk. Platelets play an important role in atherogenesis and its thrombotic complications in diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. Hence, potent platelet inhibition is of paramount importance in order to optimise outcomes of diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the increased thrombotic burden in diabetes and acute coronary syndrome, the underlying pathophysiology focussing on endothelial and platelet abnormalities, currently available antiplatelet therapies, their benefits and limitations in diabetic patients, and to describe potential future therapeutic strategies to overcome these limitations.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease

Currently approved antiplatelet treatment strategies have proved successful for reducing cardiovascular adverse events in patients with CAD. However, despite the use of recommended antiplatelet treatment strategies, the presence of DM has been consistently associated with a negative impact on outcomes and a high rate of adverse cardiovascular events continue to occur in patients with DM. The elevated prevalence of low response to standard oral antiplatelet agents contribute to these impaired outcomes. Thus, the search for more potent antiplatelet treatment strategies is warranted in high-risk patients, such as those with DM. The present manuscript provides an overview on the current status of knowledge on currently available antiplatelet agents, focusing on the benefits and limitations of these therapies in DM patients, and evaluating the potential role of new antithrombotic agents and treatment strategies currently under development to overcome these limitations.

Platelet interactions as therapeutic targets for prevention of atherothrombosis

Physiologically, platelets perform important tasks to maintain the homeostasis of the vascular wall and the surrounding environment. In pathologic conditions, however, platelets contribute to the formation of atherosclerotic plaques as well as to atherothrombotic events (i.e., acute myocardial infarction). This review aims to elucidate the role of platelets in atherogenesis and atherothrombosis and to provide an insight into current and future strategies for platelet inhibition.

Prolonged anticoagulation therapy adjunctive to aspirin after successful fibrinolysis: from early reduction in reocclusion to improved long-term clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Long-term addition of antithrombotics (clopidogrel, anticoagulants) to aspirin has improved outcome after acute coronary syndromes. Data on the impact after fibrinolysis are scarce. In Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In COronary Thrombolysis-2 (APRICOT-2), adjunctive moderate-intensity coumarin (median international normalized ratio 2.6) conferred a marked reduction in 3-month reocclusion and ischemic events. Given the association between reocclusion and long-term outcome, we performed long-term clinical follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow <48 hours after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to aspirin plus coumarin, with prolonged heparinization until the target international normalized ratio (2-3) was reached, or aspirin with standard heparinization. Three-month follow-up angiography (reocclusion rates 15% vs 28%) and long-term clinical follow-up (median 7.3 years, interquartile range 5.9-8.6 years) were performed.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to adjunctive anticoagulation (n = 123) received coumarin for a median of 280 days (113-387 days). Survival was 94% versus 88% in patients on aspirin alone (n = 128, P = .12). Infarct-free survival was 86% versus 71% (P = .01). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction bleeding was 4% in both groups. Patients with reocclusion had impaired survival: 80% versus 94% (P < .01). In a multivariable model without reocclusion, combination therapy independently predicted survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-1.00) and infarct-free survival (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.95). When adjusted for reocclusion, combination therapy did not predict outcome. Reocclusion independently predicted death (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.02-6.43) and reinfarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-intensity oral anticoagulation added to aspirin improved 8-year clinical outcome after successful fibrinolysis. The beneficial effect was largely attributed to a reduction in reocclusion, which independently predicted death and reinfarction. This study provides a mechanistic rationale for prolonged adjunctive anticoagulation after fibrinolysis.

The Role of Aspirin in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women

Cardiovascular disease is the nation's number one killer of women. Through its actions on platelet inhibition, aspirin is an effective agent for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention and for use with cardiac interventions. However, the evidence for aspirin's effectiveness in women differs by age and indication compared to men. As primary prevention, low dose aspirin is recommended for women over age 65 to reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke while younger women at high risk for stroke may benefit from aspirin. Aspirin has benefits in other selected patient groups, including diabetics and patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI/ACS), peripheral arterial disease, stroke, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Alternative platelet therapy using dipyridamole or clopidogrel, alone or with aspirin, provides some improved efficacy for reduction in recurrent events for NSTEMI, ASC and PCI, although bleeding risks may be greater. However, dual antiplatelet therapy is not currently recommended for primary prevention in even high risk subjects. Despite the evidence base and guidelines, the use of aspirin in women remains suboptimal and warrants improved provider and patient awareness.

Future innovations in anti-platelet therapies

Platelets have long been recognized to be of central importance in haemostasis, but their participation in pathological conditions such as thrombosis, atherosclerosis and inflammation is now also well established. The platelet has therefore become a key target in therapies to combat cardiovascular disease. Anti-platelet therapies are used widely, but current approaches lack efficacy in a proportion of patients, and are associated with side effects including problem bleeding. In the last decade, substantial progress has been made in understanding the regulation of platelet function, including the characterization of new ligands, platelet-specific receptors and cell signalling pathways. It is anticipated this progress will impact positively on the future innovations towards more effective and safer anti-platelet agents. In this review, the mechanisms of platelet regulation and current anti-platelet therapies are introduced, and strong, and some more speculative, potential candidate target molecules for future anti-platelet drug development are discussed.

Evidence-based perspectives on pay for performance and quality of patient care and outcomes in emergency medicine

Pay for performance is gaining momentum as a means to improve the quality of clinical care. Recently, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has expanded pay for performance initiatives to incorporate 9 emergency care metrics, including indicators for cardiac, pneumonia, and stroke care. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) have published methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. The purpose of this study is to grade each of the 9 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative emergency medicine process measures according to the ACC/AHA criteria related to clinical evidence (yes, no, indeterminate). Five of the 9 recently selected metrics in emergency medicine do not appear to meet all of the ACC/AHA criteria for measurement selection. Several of the metrics, including aspirin for acute myocardial infarction (mean hospital adherence 94.7%; SD 6.7%) and pulse oximetry for community-acquired pneumonia (mean 99.4%; SD 2.0%), already have high levels of performance nationally, which raises uncertainty about the overall cost-effectiveness of quality improvement interventions for these measures. Formal methodology needs to be established for future selection of performance measures for quality improvement programs in emergency care. These performance measures should focus on unique aspects of emergency and acute care, including recognition and treatment of time-sensitive life-threatening conditions, assessment of patients with undifferentiated signs and symptoms, and care of all-inclusive geographically based patient populations. In key emergency therapeutic areas, the evidence linking treatment and improved patient outcomes will require additional study before inclusion in pay for performance programs. New research initiatives are needed to assess the effect of timely administration of emergency department interventions on patient outcomes.

Clinical aspects of platelet inhibitors and thrombus formation

The platelet, once thought to be solely involved in clot formation, is now known to be a key mediator in various others processes such as inflammation, thrombosis, and atherosclerosis. Supported by the wealth of evidence from clinical trials demonstrating their benefits in patient outcomes, antiplatelet agents have become paramount in the prevention and management of various diseases involving the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral arterial systems. Despite being among the most widely used and studied classes of medical therapies, new discoveries regarding important clinical aspects and properties of these agents continue to be made. As our understanding of platelet biology expands, more effective and safer novel therapies continue to be developed. The use of more refined agents in conjunction with a better understanding of their effects will further the ability to provide more optimized care on an individual basis.

Antiplatelet therapy and progression of coronary artery disease: a placebo-controlled trial with angiographic and clinical follow-up after myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

In patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), antiplatelet therapy reduces subsequent cardiac events, which are often attributed to recurrent thrombosis with (sub)total occlusion in the infarct-related artery. Whether antiplatelet therapy influences the often subclinical process of coronary disease progression in noninfarct arteries has not been reported.

METHODS

Quantitative coronary angiography of noninfarct arteries was performed on paired cine-angiograms of 149 patients from fibrinolytic trials who had a patent infarct-related artery 3 to 4 weeks following STEMI and who were randomized to either continue the daily combination of 50-mg aspirin and 400-mg dipyridamole or to matching placebo. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 1 year.

RESULTS

On a per-patient basis, the change in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was 0.00 mm in the aspirin/dipyridamole group (n = 76) and was 0.01 mm in the placebo group (n = 73). There was no difference between these groups in the changes in MLD (-0.02 mm; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.05), neither were there significant differences in mean luminal diameter and diameter stenosis. Progression (1 segment/patient with > or = 0.40 mm decrease in MLD) was seen in two thirds of patients and did not independently predict long-term death and/or reinfarction.

CONCLUSION

In this placebo-controlled trial after STEMI, the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole did not affect noninfarct artery disease progression. Progression did not predict long-term clinical outcome.

Medical treatment of patients with heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Management of ischemic patients with pre-existing or new-onset left ventricular (LV) dysfunction poses a special challenge in terms of the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and appropriate adjunctive medications to optimize outcome while minimizing risk. In a systematic fashion, this review attempts to provide a management scheme for patients with heart failure or LV dysfunction that present with stable angina, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. By addressing therapeutic approaches to acute or decompensated heart failure and timing of coronary angiography based on severity of ischemia, we provide evidence-based recommendations for medications to initiate before, during, and following PCI.

Antiplatelet therapy: current strategies and future trends

Pharmacological management of thrombotic complications is strongly influenced by antiplatelet treatment strategies. Recent clinical trials have clearly indicated that current antiplatelet strategies may not inhibit recurrent thrombotic events in selected patients and improvement is necessary. Recently, there has been a gradual modification in the guidelines for clopidogrel dosing. In addition, newly developed P2Y12 receptor inhibitors and thrombin inhibitors are undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials. Moreover, research related to novel agents that interfere with other steps in coagulation and platelet adhesion, and platelet thromboxane and thrombin receptor blockers, show promise. An important future step will probably be the development of personalized therapy based on defining the individual patient’s propensity for thrombosis through investigation of platelet–thrombin–fibrin interactions. Such an approach will enhance the targeting of specific therapy based on the pathophysiology of the individual patient.

Initial approach to the patient who has chest pain

The last decade has seen extraordinary advances in the cardiovascular arena, particularly in the evaluation and management of the patient who has acute coronary syndromes. From bedside markers of myocardial damage to drug-eluting stents, technical advances are proliferating. Efforts in developing an international registry for acute aortic dissection have helped elucidate the acute presentation, management, and prognosis of this uncommon but lethal disease. Finally, the multiple research efforts in coordinating clinical decision-making with serologic markers and advanced imaging for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is changing the approach to the patient at risk for thromboembolic disease.

Adding clopidogrel to aspirin improves outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy

Acute coronary syndromes result from the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque with superimposed thrombosis. In an ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the thrombus occludes the coronary vessel, leading to an abrupt decrease in myocardial perfusion. The focus of initial management is the timely restoration of flow in the infarct-related artery via fibrinolytic therapy or percutaneous coronary intervention. Adjunctive therapy aimed at inhibition of platelets and the coagulation cascade is critical to establish and maintain vessel patency. Clopidogrel, an oral antiplatelet agent, has recently been shown to offer significant clinical benefit in STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction) and is a welcome addition to standard fibrinolytic therapy.

Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in the emergency treatment of myocardial infarction (MI), early mortality and morbidity remain high. The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel adds to the benefit of aspirin in acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, but its effects in patients with ST-elevation MI were unclear.

METHODS

45,852 patients admitted to 1250 hospitals within 24 h of suspected acute MI onset were randomly allocated clopidogrel 75 mg daily (n=22,961) or matching placebo (n=22,891) in addition to aspirin 162 mg daily. 93% had ST-segment elevation or bundle branch block, and 7% had ST-segment depression. Treatment was to continue until discharge or up to 4 weeks in hospital (mean 15 days in survivors) and 93% of patients completed it. The two prespecified co-primary outcomes were: (1) the composite of death, reinfarction, or stroke; and (2) death from any cause during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons were by intention to treat, and used the log-rank method. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00222573.

FINDINGS

Allocation to clopidogrel produced a highly significant 9% (95% CI 3-14) proportional reduction in death, reinfarction, or stroke (2121 [9.2%] clopidogrel vs 2310 [10.1%] placebo; p=0.002), corresponding to nine (SE 3) fewer events per 1000 patients treated for about 2 weeks. There was also a significant 7% (1-13) proportional reduction in any death (1726 [7.5%] vs 1845 [8.1%]; p=0.03). These effects on death, reinfarction, and stroke seemed consistent across a wide range of patients and independent of other treatments being used. Considering all fatal, transfused, or cerebral bleeds together, no significant excess risk was noted with clopidogrel, either overall (134 [0.58%] vs 125 [0.55%]; p=0.59), or in patients aged older than 70 years or in those given fibrinolytic therapy.

INTERPRETATION

In a wide range of patients with acute MI, adding clopidogrel 75 mg daily to aspirin and other standard treatments (such as fibrinolytic therapy) safely reduces mortality and major vascular events in hospital, and should be considered routinely.

Plasma TAFI and soluble CD40 ligand do not predict reperfusion following thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction

INTRODUCTION

Thrombolytic therapy fails to achieve reperfusion in almost a third of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) are novel endogenous fibrinolytic and atherothrombotic factors that determine clot stability. We investigated whether admission plasma thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) concentrations predicted reperfusion following thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prior to administration of thrombolytic therapy, venous blood was collected from 110 patients presenting with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and plasma assayed for tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigen and activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 antigen (PAI-1), TAFI antigen and activity, C-reactive protein (CRP) and sCD40L concentrations. Reperfusion was determined using continuous ST segment monitoring.

RESULTS

Reperfusion occurred in 77 (70%) patients with a mean treatment to reperfusion time of 83 +/- 46 min. Peak creatine kinase was significantly lower in patients who reperfused (1578 +/- 1199 versus 2200 +/- 1744 U/L; P < 0.05) and correlated with time to reperfusion (r = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.23 - 0.61], P = 0.0001). There was a modest correlation between plasma TAFI antigen and activity (r = 0.3 [95% CI: 0.04 - 0.53]; P < 0.05). There were no significant associations between coronary reperfusion and plasma concentrations of t-PA, PAI-1, TAFI, CRP or sCD40L.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic plasma TAFI, sCD40L and CRP concentrations do not predict reperfusion in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

First-generation agents: aspirin, heparin and coumarins

Aspirin, heparin and the coumarins are the classical anti-thrombotic agents. They represent the platform upon which newer drugs holding the promise of greater efficacy and less toxicity are being developed. Even as such newer drugs arrive into clinical practice, the older agents remain remarkable for their decades-long pre-eminence. All derive from natural sources, and none from a search for therapeutic anti-thrombotic agents; they have saved countless lives but also served as essential probes into basic mechanisms of thrombosis. Testament to their clinical importance is that these agents are the only drugs profiled on a regular basis in special scientific statements by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and by the American College of Chest Physicians. This chapter reviews their biology, uses and limitations.

Aspirin plus coumarin versus aspirin alone in the prevention of reocclusion after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In Coronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT)-2 Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the use of aspirin, reocclusion of the infarct-related artery occurs in approximately 30% of patients within the first year after successful fibrinolysis, with impaired clinical outcome. This study sought to assess the impact of a prolonged anticoagulation regimen as adjunctive to aspirin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemic events after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

At coronary angiography <48 hours after fibrinolytic therapy, 308 patients receiving aspirin and intravenous heparin had a patent infarct-related artery (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 3 flow). They were randomly assigned to standard heparinization and continuation of aspirin alone or to a 3-month combination of aspirin with moderate-intensity coumarin, including continued heparinization until a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0 to 3.0. Angiographic and clinical follow-up were assessed at 3 months. Median INR was 2.6 (25 to 75th percentiles 2.1 to 3.1). Reocclusion (< or =TIMI grade 2 flow) was observed in 15% of patients receiving aspirin and coumarin compared with 28% in those receiving aspirin alone (relative risk [RR], 0.55; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.90; P<0.02). TIMI grade 0 to 1 flow rates were 9% and 20%, respectively (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.89; P<0.02). Survival rates free from reinfarction and revascularization were 86% and 66%, respectively (P<0.01). Bleeding (TIMI major and minor) was infrequent: 5% versus 3% (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

As adjunctive to aspirin, a 3-month-regimen of moderate-intensity coumarin, including heparinization until the target INR is reached, markedly reduces reocclusion and recurrent events after successful fibrinolysis. This conceptual study provides a mechanistic rationale to further investigate the role of prolonged anticoagulation after fibrinolytic therapy.

Changes over time in the use of aspirin in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (1975 to 1997): a population-based perspective

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine 2 decade-long trends in the use of aspirin and associated outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Aspirin has been shown to be beneficial in the secondary prevention of AMI. However, little is known about changes over time in the use of aspirin in patients hospitalized with AMI and associated outcomes, particularly from a more generalizable population-based perspective.

METHODS

We examined trends in aspirin use and hospital and long-term outcomes in 9336 metropolitan Worcester, Mass, residents hospitalized with validated AMI in all area hospitals between 1975 and 1997.

RESULTS

Between 1975 and 1986, the hospital use of aspirin remained stable at approximately 20%. Use of aspirin increased markedly after this time from 49% in 1988 to 91% in 1997. Younger age, male sex, and a history of hypertension or stroke were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving aspirin. Patients with diabetes were less likely to receive aspirin than were patients without diabetes. Patients who received aspirin during hospitalization were more likely to receive beta-blockers and coronary interventions. Patients treated with aspirin were significantly less likely to have heart failure or cardiogenic shock develop or to die during hospitalization as compared with patients not treated with aspirin. Patients treated with aspirin had significantly higher survival rates over a 10-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The results of this community-wide study show that aspirin use in patients hospitalized with AMI has dramatically increased over time. Despite the beneficial effects associated with the use of aspirin, this therapy remains underused in several high-risk groups.

Critical pathways for management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: an assessment by the National Heart Attack Alert Program

BACKGROUND

The use of critical pathways for a variety of clinical conditions has grown rapidly in recent years, particularly pathways for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, no systematic review exists regarding the value of critical pathways in this setting.

METHODS

The National Heart Attack Alert Program established a Working Group to review the utility of critical pathways on quality of care and outcomes for patients with ACS. A literature search of MEDLINE, cardiology textbooks, and cited references in any article identified was conducted regarding the use of critical pathways for patients with ACS.

RESULTS

Several areas for improving the care of patients with ACS through the application of critical pathways were identified: increasing the use of guideline-recommended medications, targeting use of cardiac procedures and other cardiac testing, and reducing the length of stay in hospitals and intensive care units. Initial studies have shown promising results in improving quality of care and reducing costs. No large studies designed to demonstrate an improvement in mortality or morbidity were identified in this literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical pathways offer the potential to improve the care of patients with ACS while reducing the cost of care. Their use should improve the process and cost-effectiveness of care, but further research in this field is needed to determine whether these changes in the process of care will translate into improved clinical outcomes.

Safety of coronary stenting early after thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: one- and six-month clinical and angiographic evolution

To determine the feasibility and safety of early posthrombolysis coronary stenting and the incidence of further reocclusion, we followed 99 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction thrombolyzed with rt-PA 2.0 +/- 0.8 hr after onset. Culprit artery was stented 14.0 +/- 7.0 hr after thrombolysis. All patients underwent clinical and angiographic follow-up at 1 and 6 months. Angiographic success was achieved in 99% of cases. Neither major cardiac events nor bleeding or vascular complications occurred during hospital stay. At 30 days, no events occurred and normal flow persisted in all stented arteries. At 6 months, only one artery reoccluded (1%), resulting in a nonfatal reinfarction. Restenosis rate was 21%. Contribution of the infarcted area to left ventricular function significantly increased from baseline to 30-day and to 6-month evaluations. Thus, early posthrombolysis stenting is a safe strategy with a low reocclusion rate, which seems to allow functional recovery of the infarcted area. Further studies are necessary to define its impact on survival and cost-effectiveness.

Argatroban: a direct thrombin inhibitor for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and other clinical applications

Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor derived from arginine, is an effective anticoagulant indicated for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Argatroban has been used as an alternative anticoagulant in patients with HIT in various clinical conditions including interventional cardiovascular procedures that require anticoagulation. Satisfactory clinical outcomes with acceptable complications have been reported in these patients. Whether argatroban offers additional clinical advantage over conventional heparin therapy in patients without HIT remains unclear. Argatroban has been evaluated as an alternative anticoagulant to replace heparin in various clinical studies, especially in patients with coronary artery disease or cerebral vascular disease. To date, it remains unclear if argatroban is more effective than heparin, although the agent seems to cause less bleeding complications. This article reviews the pharmacology of argatroban and its clinical application beyond the management of HIT, with particular emphasis on interventional cardiology procedure, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, cerebral thrombosis or ischemic stroke, peripheral obstructive arterial disease, and extracorporeal circulation.

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: The new paradigm of direct revascularization

Acute myocardial infarction results from thrombotic occlusion superimposed on a ruptured athersoclerotic plaque. Immediate restoration of normal flow in the infarct-related artery can be achieved either with fibrinolytic or with direct mechanical revascularization. Primary PTCA has been shown to be superior to fibrinolytic therapy with respect to mortality, reinfarction, non-fatal stroke and length of hospitalization. Its results can be further improved by the addition of potent platelet inhibitors directed against the final common component of all stimuli for platelet aggregation, the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor. In randomized clinical trials, primary angioplasty with adjunctive abciximab - a monoclonal antibody against the GP IIb/IIIa - was better than conventional primary angioplasty with heparin only. Abciximab use was associated with a significant reduction in reinfarction, need for urgent target vessel revascularization, microcirculatory dysfunction and regional left ventricular dysfunction as well as with a strong trend towards a reduction in mortality, even in patients receiving coronary stents.

Antiplatelet medications and their indications in preventing and treating coronary thrombosis

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and complications following percutaneous coronary intervention. Three classes of platelet-inhibiting drugs, aspirin, thienopyridines and platelet glycoprotein IIb/ IIIa inhibitors, are now commonly used for the prevention and treatment of disorders of coronary artery thrombosis. For the last several decades aspirin has been the sole option for antiplatelet therapy in the treatment and prevention of the manifestations of cardiovascular disease. However, a wider selection of antiplatelet agents, including the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) and the platelet glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, are now available and provide clinicians with the opportunity to potentially improve upon the previous gold standard of aspirin. This review summarizes these drugs and the scientific data that have led to their use in primary and secondary prevention, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Antiplatelet therapy

Within the last few years antiplatelet therapy has developed exponentially, with new agents being tested in an increasing number of clinical scenarios. The mechanism of action of these newer agents and evidence of benefit is prevented in this review.

Clotting for the Clinician: An Overview of Thrombosis and Antithrombotic Therapy

The use of antithrombotic therapy has taken on central importance in the field of cardiovascular disease. Currently, anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs are central to the treatment and the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. New insights into the "revised" coagulation cascade have highlighted new targets for intervention. In addition, the interactions between the coagulation system and platelets demonstrate ways that anticoagulants may affect platelet function and how antiplatelet agents may have anticoagulant effects. This overview will describe the present understanding of primary and secondary hemostasis, and current and future therapeutic approaches to modify these systems for therapeutic effects in cardiovascular medicine.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Streptokinase plus Desmopressin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Study

In this pilot study the combined use of desmopressin, which releases tissue plasminogen activator from vascular endothelium, and a low dose of streptokinase as a new thrombolytic regimen for acute myocardial infarction is proposed. Eighteen patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated intravenously with 150,000 U (4 patients) or 250,000 U (14 patients) of streptokinase infused over 10 minutes, followed by 24 µg of desmopressin infused over 5-10 minutes. Aspirin and beta-blockers were administered at admission, and heparin and oral anticoagulants were started at the end of the thrombolytic regimen. Hemostatic parameters were studied before and 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes after starting thrombolytic therapy. Fifteen patients (83.3%) had evidence of clinical reperfusion. Angiography was performed with a mean delay of 8.8 hours (range 1.5-22 hours) from the start of thrombolytic therapy. Fourteen patients (77.8%) had patency of the infarct-related artery: 10 patients (55.6%) achieved TIMI grade 3, and 4 patients (22%) achieved TIMI grade 2. Two patients (one TIMI grade 1 and one TIMI grade 2) underwent coronary angioplasty. No patient died during the in-hospital period. At 18 months follow-up, all patients are alive. No major or minor bleeding was detected. The significant decline in plasma fibrinogen and in the euglobulin lysis time, and the increase in fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, indicate a plasma lytic state. Crosslinked fibrin degradation products increased from 310 +/- 120 ng/ml to 670 +/- 310 ng/ml (p = 0.009), suggesting that fibrin digestion occurred in vivo. This pilot study provides data supporting the feasibility and efficacy of a new and more economic thrombolytic treatment of acute myocardial infarction without hemorrhagic complications.

Optimizing the Treatment of Unstable Angina

Unstable angina and non--Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) are at the center of the spectrum of myocardial ischemia, which ranges from stable angina to acute Q-wave MI. In addition to clinical evaluation, cardiac specific markers such as troponin T or I can assist in early diagnosis, triage, and risk stratification. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and heparin have been shown to improve the outcome of patients with acute ischemic syndromes. Thrombolytic therapy does not appear to be beneficial in these syndromes. Antiischemic therapy remains an important component of the overall therapy. A strategy of early coronary angiography and revascularization leads to a similar long-term outcome as compared with a more conservative strategy of revascularization for recurrent ischemia, but the early invasive strategy is more expeditious as a large number of conservatively treated patients have recurrent ischemia. At present, many new antithrombotic agents are under active investigation, with the hope that they will lead to further improvement in the clinical outcome of patients with acute ischemic syndromes.

Overcoming thrombolytic resistance: rationale and initial clinical experience combining thrombolytic therapy and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to review the emerging data and the clinical rationale for combining glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Although thrombolytic therapy has been a major advance in the treatment of acute ST segment elevation MI, new single-bolus thrombolytic agents have been unable to break the "thrombolytic ceiling" in infarct-related artery (IRA) patency.

METHODS

Recent literature on GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes was reviewed.

RESULTS

A new approach toward improving current thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimens focuses on "targeted therapy" for each component of the occlusive coronary thrombus: fibrin, thrombin and platelets. For the fibrin component, front-loading and/or bolus dosing of plasminogen activators (PAs) has identified the currently available doses of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-PA). For the thrombin component, several recent trials have shown that lower doses of heparin improve the safety profile of the thrombolytic-antithrombotic regimen. For the platelet component, aspirin has been shown to be effective, but the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors offer the potential for more effective platelet inhibition and improved clinical efficacy. The benefits of GPIIb/IIIa inhibition in reducing death, MI or urgent revascularization in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention are well established. Emerging experimental and clinical data now suggest that combining GPIIb/IIIa inhibition with reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy may improve early IRA patency without increasing bleeding risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the strong clinical and physiologic rationale, clinical investigation in acute ST segment elevation MI is currently focused on combining the potent GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors with reduced-dose fibrinolytic agents in acute MI, with the goal of overcoming "thrombolytic resistance."