Regional coronary vasoconstriction after combined beta-adrenergic and calcium channel blockade in patients with coronary artery disease

Role of β 2 Adrenergic Receptors in Human Atherosclerotic Coronary Arteries

Background— Adrenergic regulation of coronary vasomotion is balanced between α 1 -adrenergic–mediated (α 1 -AR) constriction and β 2 -adrenergic–mediated (β 2 -AR) relaxation. This study aimed at assessing the role of β 2 -ARs in normal, mildly atherosclerotic, and stenotic human coronary arteries.

Methods and Results— During intracoronary (IC) infusion of increasing doses of the β 2 -AR agonist salbutamol (0.15, 0.3, and 0.6 μg/min) and the endothelial vasodilator acetylcholine (1, 3, and 10 μg/min), we measured (1) changes in lumen diameter (LD) by quantitative coronary angiography in 34 normal, 55 mildly atherosclerotic, and 42 stenotic coronary artery segments and (2) changes in average peak velocity (APV) and coronary blood flow (CBF) with the use of Doppler flow wire in 11 normal, 10 mildly atherosclerotic, and 11 stenotic coronary arteries. In 6 of 11 stenotic coronary arteries, the protocol was repeated after an IC bolus (12 μg/kg) of the α-adrenergic blocker phentolamine. In 6 of 11 normal coronary arteries, the protocol was repeated after an IC infusion (60 μmol/min) of N G -monomethyl- l -arginine (L-NMMA), a nitric oxide inhibitor. Neither salbutamol IC infusion nor acetylcholine significantly changed heart rate or blood pressure, whereas L-NMMA slightly increased blood pressure. In normal coronary arteries, salbutamol increased LD (LD max %: 11±2, P <0.05), APV (APV max %: 53±17, P <0.05), and CBF (CBF max %: 57±17, P <0.05), whereas L-NMMA caused a blunted APV (APV max %: 27±6, P <0.05) and CBF (CBF max %: 29±6, P <0.05) response to salbutamol. In mildly atherosclerotic coronary arteries, the salbutamol increase in LD (LD max %: 10±2, P <0.05), APV (APV max %: 33±12, P <0.05), and CBF (CBF max %: 37±12, P <0.05) was preserved. In stenotic coronary arteries, salbutamol induced a paradoxical reduction in LD (LD max %: −6±2, P <0.05), APV (APV max %: −15±9, P <0.05), and CBF (CBF max %: −15±6, P <0.05), which was no longer observed after phentolamine. Acetylcholine increased LD (LD max %: 14±3, P <0.05), APV (APV max %: 61±20, P <0.05), and CBF (CBF max %: 67±19, P <0.05) in normal coronary arteries. In mildly atherosclerotic coronary arteries, acetylcholine induced a significant reduction in LD (LD max %: −15±2, P <0.05) and no changes in APV (APV max %: −6±13, P =NS) and CBF (CBF max %: −10±13, P =NS). In stenotic coronary arteries, acetylcholine significantly reduced LD (LD max %: −15±3, P <0.05), APV (APV max %: −15±9, P <0.05), and CBF (CBF max %: −15±6, P <0.05).

Conclusions— In severely atherosclerotic coronary arteries, β 2 -adrenergic vasodilatation is impaired, and this might contribute to alter the vasomotor balance, further precipitating myocardial ischemia during sympathetic activation.

Effect of atenolol and celiprolol on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion in coronary artery disease

Earlier studies have reported on the potentiated muscarinic vasoconstriction of intracoronary acetylcholine after metoprolol application in patients with coronary artery disease. The present study investigated the effect of celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo on acetylcholine-induced vasomotion in patients with coronary artery disease. Furthermore, direct effects on coronary vasomotion and on hemodynamics were evaluated. Acetylcholine (intracoronary concentrations of 6.3x10(-7), 2.0x10(-6), and 6.3x10(-6) M) was given before and after double-blind celiprolol (0.30 mg/kg IV), atenolol (0.15 mg/kg IV), or placebo in 3x12 patients. Vasomotion was investigated by quantitative coronary angiography in proximal and distal segments of epicardial coronary arteries, and by the determination of the coronary resistance index based on Doppler-flow measurements. The investigated drugs had no direct affect on the diameter of the epicardial coronary arteries. However, celiprolol, in contrast to atenolol, significantly reduced systemic vascular resistance (change after atenolol: from 1,855+/-308 to 2,161+/-550 dyne s cm(-5); celiprolol: 1,691+/-435 to 1,411+/-343 dyne s cm(-5); and placebo: 1,722+/-215 to 1,710+/-213 dyne s cm(-5), p<0.001) and the coronary resistance index (change after atenolol: 2.52+/-3.58 to 2.86+/-4.24; celiprolol: 2.70+/-1.55 to 2.49+/-2.26; and placebo: 1.97+/-1.35 to 1.92+/-1.25, p<0.01). Celiprolol, atenolol, and placebo did not have different effects on acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion of epicardial conductance vessels (diminution of proximal lumen diameter before/after atenolol: 0.42+/-0.39/0.44+/-0.39 mm; celiprolol: 0.32+/-0.26/0.30+/-0.24 mm; and placebo: 0.36+/-0.29/0.43+/-0.40 mm) and of coronary resistance vessels (reduction of coronary resistance index before/after atenolol: 1.95 +/-4.74/ 1.92+/-3.74; celiprolol: 0.98+/-0.73/1.41+/-1.50; and placebo: 1.16+/-1.29/1.16+/-1.04). In contrast to atenolol, celiprolol possesses vasodilative properties in systemic and coronary resistance vessels. There was no direct effect on the diameter of conductance vessels. Acetylcholine-induced coronary vasomotion both in conductance and resistance vessels was not influenced by the beta blockers that were studied. This suggests that atenolol and celiprolol do not influence endothelium-dependent, nitric oxide related vasomotion.

Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review

Calcium-channel antagonists and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have become important modalities in the cardiovascular therapeutic armamentarium. These drugs are often administered as monotherapy to a wide range of cardiological patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and other diseases. Since within each class these drugs exhibit pharmacologic differences, it follows that their effectiveness varies in different disease states and that they exhibit a wide variety of side effects. In an attempt to optimize therapy, the individual drugs from these two classes can be combined; and the efficaciousness and side-effect profile of various combinations between calcium-channel antagonists and beta blockers are discussed in this review. Recommendations as to which patients may benefit from a combination and as to which patients may be harmed by the combination therapy will be made. Very few studies have compared the safety and efficacy of a single agent with the combination and with placebo in a controlled randomized fashion. To determine which therapy is superior and to determine which combination one should recommend under what circumstances, such placebo-controlled, randomized trials are a necessity, and will hopefully be performed although the complexity is enormous.

Exercise-induced myocardial ischemia in a cold environment. Effect of antianginal medications

The influence of cold on the threshold for myocardial ischemia and the efficacy of antianginal drugs in a cold environment were assessed in 24 patients with stable angina and exercise-induced ST depression. Treadmill exercise tests were done according to a randomized double-blind protocol 90 minutes after administration of placebo, 80 mg propranolol, or 120 mg diltiazem, each at both -8 degrees and 20 degrees C. Eight of the patients were classified by history as cold-sensitive before the study. For the entire group, none of the exercise end points differed significantly between cold and normal temperatures with placebo. However, cold-sensitive patients developed 1 mm ST depression 30% sooner (169 +/- 41 versus 244 +/- 38 seconds, p less than 0.01) at -8 degrees C compared with 20 degrees C. At the onset of ischemia, rate-pressure product was lower in the cold (19.8 +/- 1.0 versus 22.0 +/- 1.6 x 10(-3), p less than 0.05). Both propranolol and diltiazem prolonged time to onset of 1 mm ST depression at both temperatures. The magnitude of improvement at -8 degrees C was equal to that at 20 degrees C, and differences between the two drugs were not statistically significant. Only diltiazem prolonged total exercise duration. Thus, as assessed by exercise testing, cold does not worsen ischemic threshold in most stable angina patients. However, in a subgroup identifiable by history, ischemic threshold is lower in the cold. Propranolol and diltiazem are as effective for exercise-induced ischemia in a cold environment as at normal temperatures.

Safety and efficacy of esmolol for unstable angina pectoris

Esmolol is a rapidly metabolized cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocker that provides steady state beta-adrenergic blockade when administered by continuous intravenous infusion. To determine the efficacy of esmolol in the management of unstable angina, 23 patients with known coronary artery disease, who averaged 3.7 +/- 2.7 daily episodes of chest pain at rest, were randomized to receive either a continuous infusion of esmolol (n = 12) or oral propranolol (n = 11), as an adjunct to concomitant antianginal therapy. Patients with systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg, heart rate less than 60 beats/min or known contraindications to beta blockade were excluded. Esmolol was titrated in a step-wise fashion from 2 to 24 mg/min at 5-minute intervals up to a 30% reduction in heart rate and systolic blood pressure double-product. The propranolol dose was increased every 6 hours by 50 to 100% to achieve a similar reduction in heart rate and blood pressure. When compared with their 24-hour baseline periods, both groups achieved a significant reduction in episodes of chest pain, from 4.6 +/- 3.3 to 1.4 +/- 1.5 in the esmolol group (p less than 0.02) and 2.6 +/- 1.4 to 1.0 +/- 1.5 in the propranolol group (p less than 0.02) during the subsequent study period. The cardiac event rate and incidence of drug side effects were similar between the 2 groups; however, side effects seen with esmolol did not require treatment after drug discontinuation. Thus, maximally tolerated beta blockade is an effective therapy for unstable angina.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alterations in regional myocardial blood flow after nitroprusside and nitroglycerin in patients with and without significant coronary artery disease

To evaluate vasodilator-induced redistribution of regional myocardial blood flow, intravenous sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin were administered in doses producing matched reductions (15%) in mean arterial pressure at constant heart rate. Anterior left ventricular great cardiac vein blood flow (thermodilution) was measured in 14 patients without angiographic anterior collateral supply. Global coronary sinus blood flow remained constant with both nitroprusside and nitroglycerin administration, despite significant reductions in mean arterial pressure. However, nitroglycerin reduced great vein flow by 25 +/- 17% and nitroprusside by 10 +/- 16% (p less than 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that the nitroglycerin-nitroprusside regional blood flow differences were more pronounced in patients without significant left anterior descending coronary artery narrowing. Neither vasodilator produced significant differences in arterial-coronary sinus oxygen or lactate contents, calculated myocardial oxygen consumption, left ventricular dP/dt, or electrocardiographic or clinical signs of myocardial ischemia. Despite qualitatively similar hemodynamic effects, comparisons of vasodilator-induced relative reductions in normally supplied anterior left ventricular regional coronary blood flow suggest a mechanism of the reported beneficial effects of nitroglycerin on potentially ischemic myocardial regions.