Effect of prior myocardial infarction and extent and location of coronary disease on accuracy of exercise echocardiography

Impact of previous myocardial infarction on the incremental value of myocardial contrast to two-dimensional supine bicycle stress echocardiography in evaluation of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

If compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) improves detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) during pharmacological stress, but data on MCE vs. 2DE during supine bicycle stress is limited. Although previous myocardial infarction (MI) influences sensitivity of 2DE, its effect on MCE has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to determine the incremental benefit of MCE over 2DE for evaluation of CAD during supine bicycle stress and to assess the impact of previous MI on diagnostic values of both methods.

METHODS

We studied 103 consecutive patients scheduled for coronary angiography. Prior to coronary angiography, all patients underwent supine bicycle stress. 2DE and MCE were performed during this stress test. The diagnosis of obstructive CAD (> or =50% stenosis) was based on the presence of inducible wall motion and perfusion abnormalities.

RESULTS

Quantitative coronary angiography revealed > or =50% stenosis in 53 of 77 patients without previous MI and in 21 of 26 patients with previous MI. If compared to 2DE, MCE was more sensitive (68% vs. 86%; p<0.001) and more accurate (73% vs. 86%; p < 0.001) to detect > or =50% stenosis. In patients without previous MI, 2DE and MCE yielded sensitivity of 65% and 85% (p < 0.01) and accuracy of 71% and 85% (p < 0.01), whereas in patients with previous MI sensitivity was 79% and 90% (p=NS) and accuracy 79% and 88% (p = NS), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MCE enhances sensitivity and accuracy of 2DE in detection of obstructive CAD during supine bicycle stress. The incremental benefit of MCE is especially present in patients without previous MI.

Quantitative three-dimensional wall motion analysis predicts ischemic region size and location

Stress echocardiography is an important screening test for coronary artery disease. Currently, cardiologists rely on visual analysis of left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities, which is subjective and qualitative. We previously used finite-element models of the regionally ischemic left ventricle to develop a wall motion measure, 3DFS, for predicting ischemic region size and location from real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE). The purpose of this study was to validate these methods against regional blood flow measurements during regional ischemia and to compare the accuracy of our methods to the current state of the art, visual scoring by trained cardiologists. We acquired RT3DE images during 20 brief (<2 min) coronary occlusions in dogs and determined ischemic region size and location by microsphere-based measurement of regional perfusion. We identified regions of abnormal wall motion using 3DFS and by blinded visual scoring. 3DFS predicted ischemic region size well (correlation r (2) = 0.64 against microspheres, p < 0.0001), reducing error by more than half compared to visual scoring (8 +/- 9% vs. 19 +/- 14%, p < 0.05), while localizing the ischemic region with equal accuracy. We conclude that 3DFS is an objective, quantitative measure of wall motion that localizes acutely ischemic regions as accurately as wall motion scoring while providing superior quantification of ischemic region size.

Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)

Stress echocardiography is the combination of 2D echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress. The diagnostic end point for the detection of myocardial ischemia is the induction of a transient worsening in regional function during stress. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. Among different stresses of comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, semisupine exercise is the most used, dobutamine the best test for viability, and dipyridamole the safest and simplest pharmacological stress and the most suitable for combined wall motion coronary flow reserve assessment. The additional clinical benefit of myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography and myocardial velocity imaging has been inconsistent to date, whereas the potential of adding - coronary flow reserve evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography adds another potentially important dimension to stress echocardiography. New emerging fields of application taking advantage from the versatility of the technique are Doppler stress echo in valvular heart disease and in dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of its dependence upon operator's training, stress echocardiography is today the best (most cost-effective and risk-effective) possible imaging choice to achieve the still elusive target of sustainable cardiac imaging in the field of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Stress echocardiography from 1979 to present

Stress echocardiography was initially developed in 1979 and has seen substantial success in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It has proven applicable to clinical questions of diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up. It has been heavily dependent on technologic advancements, initially digital capturing for side-by-side visualization and, more recently, developments in detailed methods of evaluating myocardial mechanics and contrast echocardiography for perfusion.

Comparison between dobutamine echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomography for interpretive reproducibility

Interpretive variability of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been previously investigated. However, no study has directly compared the variability of these techniques in the same patient population. We directly compared the interpretive reproducibility of DSE and stress SPECT in patients undergoing both types of pharmacologic stress imaging. Before discharge, simultaneous DSE and SPECT was performed in 56 patients early after a first acute myocardial infarction. Intra- and interobserver concordances were evaluated by exact agreement and kappa statistic. Intraclass coefficient of correlation was used to assess intra- and interobserver reproducibilities of segmental score analysis. Intraobserver agreement percentages in the identification of patients with ischemia were 98% for SPECT and 91% for DSE (p = NS) and kappa values were excellent (>0.80) for both techniques. Interobserver agreement was higher (p <0.01) for SPECT (96%) than for DSE (79%). Similarly, kappa value was excellent for SPECT (0.92) and only moderate for DSE (0.56). Finally, the intraclass coefficients of correlation for intra- and interobserver reproducibilities were higher for SPECT (0.98 and 0.97, respectively) than for DSE (0.80 and 0.71, respectively; p <0.001 for both). In conclusion, after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, stress SPECT imaging has a better interpretive reproducibility than DSE.

Comparative Analysis Using the 80-Lead Body Surface Map and 12-Lead ECG With Exercise Stress Echocardiograms

This retrospective study constituted of 144 patients who were recruited at the University of California Davis Medical Center (UCDMC) Echo and Stress Laboratory during a 10-month period by referrals for standard ESE to assess for CAD. Participation criteria included referral for a standard ESE, age older than 18 years, and the same criteria as standard stress tests. Standard stress test exclusion criteria were applied as well (Table 1).12 All patients gave informed consent. The study group, called the 80-lead BSM group, consisted of 72 participants. Seventy-two random participants comprised the 12lead ECG group (see Table 2). Twenty-two participants in the 80-lead group had poor image quality ESE or incomplete data for exercise cessation and/or image acquisition real time; as a result, these participants were excluded from the study. None of the ESE of the 12-lead ECG group was considered of poor image quality, nor were any data incomplete. STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAMS

Stress Echocardiography

Stress echocardiography is commonly employed for the clinical management of known or suspected coronary artery disease. This review discusses the accuracy of the technique, which is equivalent to that of competing imaging techniques, as well as its overall role in patient management. The utilization of stress echocardiographic modalities in clinical presentations, such as chest pain, congestive heart failure, and valvular heart disease, and preoperative risk assessment, as well as determining myocardial viability, are discussed.

Comparison of peak and postexercise treadmill echocardiography with the use of continuous harmonic imaging acquisition

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the feasibility and accuracy of peak and postexercise treadmill echocardiography with the use of continuous harmonic imaging capture.

BACKGROUND

Previous work has demonstrated the superiority of peak exercise echocardiography (EE) as compared with post-EE for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, most of these studies used fundamental imaging and view-per-view acquisition systems. Technical advantages in stress echocardiography include harmonic imaging and continuous imaging capture.

METHODS

The study group included 650 patients (423 men; 60 +/- 12 years) who were submitted to peak and postexercise treadmill echocardiography.

RESULTS

Postexercise images were acquired within 55 seconds after exercise (28 +/- 10). The number of segments visualized in each view were similar at peak and post-EE except for the parasternal short-axis view, which was better qualified at postexercise. For analysis of diagnostic capability we included 312 patients: 195 were included on the basis of having had an EE and a coronary angiography, whereas 117 patients with pretest probability of CAD < 10% who had atypical chest pain or were asymptomatic were also included and considered as having no CAD. CAD (>/=50% stenosis) was confirmed in 159 patients. Positive EE was defined as ischemia or necrosis. Sensitivity for CAD was higher with peak imaging (92% vs 77%, P <.001), with similar specificity (78% vs 87%, P = not significant) and accuracy (85% vs 82%, P = not significant).

CONCLUSION

Peak treadmill EE is technically feasible and has higher sensitivity for CAD than posttreadmill EE. Therefore, in the clinical setting, peak EE should be performed for diagnostic purposes.

Comparing stress testing methods. Available techniques and their use in CAD evaluation

Exercise stress testing remains one of the most widely used techniques in assessing functional capacity and in confirming a diagnosis of CAD. Its sensitivity and specificity are approximately 63% and 74%, respectively. The technique is safe when administered and supervised by qualified personnel who are trained to recognize contraindications and other reasons for termination of the test. More recently, echocardiography has been combined with exercise stress testing. It is a well-tolerated and valuable procedure for noninvasive evaluation of CAD. The sensitivity and specificity of stress echocardiography are higher than those of exercise stress testing and comparable to those of nuclear perfusion imaging. Continuing improvements in digital image analysis, cost, and the availability of contrast agents promise to make noninvasive stress testing even more useful in the years to come. Newer contrast and concomitant perfusion agents are on the horizon and may prove to be a reality in the echocardiographic laboratories of the future.

Relationship between the ischemic threshold at the onset of wall-motion abnormality on semisupine exercise echocardiography and the extent of coronary artery disease

Semisupine exercise echocardiography (SSEE) provides the unique opportunity of continuous monitoring of segmental wall motion during physiologic stress. We evaluated the relationship between the ischemic threshold at the onset of wall-motion abnormality on SSEE and the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a consecutive series of 224 patients who underwent coronary angiography. Ischemic threshold was significantly lower for patients with multivessel disease compared with single-vessel disease: maximal workload was 102 versus 135 W (P = 1.3.10(-6)); percentage of maximal predicted heart rate achieved was 64 versus 70% (P =.004); and double product was 21,335 versus 23,389 (P =.03), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of SSEE for the detection of significant CAD (> or =60% diameter stenosis) were 81%, 74%, 90%, and 56%, respectively. SSEE is an accurate tool to diagnose CAD and the ischemic threshold at the onset of wall-motion abnormality is inversely related to the extent of CAD.

Diagnosis of ischemic heart disease with exercise echocardiography: Comparison of images obtained at peak- and post-exercise

Peak-and post-exercise stress echocardiography were compared with respect to ability to detect coronary artery disease in 138 consecutive patients undergoing supine bicycle stress echocardiography. Sixty of these patients had single-vessel disease; 37, double-vessel disease; and 19, triple-vessel disease. Exercise was performed in the 20- to 30-degree left decubitus position on an echo-bed with an ergometer. Exercise started at 50 watts and was increased in 25-watt every 3 minutes and to a maximum of 150 watts. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were digitized and assigned in a quad-screen format for nonbiased interpretation. Total wall motion score (TWMS) was the sum of the wall motion score, from normokinesis (0) to dyskinesis (4), of 16 segments. Image quality score index (IQSI) was the mean of the image quality scores in all views. All of the patients underwent coronary arteriography. Significant coronary stenosis was defined as≧75% stenosis of the large coronary arteries. Two-dimensional echocardiographic studies were adequate for analysis in 133 patients during the peak-exercise stage (peak-exercise) and in 137 patients 30 to 60 seconds after the end of exercise (post-exercise). TWMS at peak-exercise was higher than at post-exercise, while IQSI at peak-exercise was lower than at post-exercise. Sensitivity at peak-exercise versus that at post-exercise was 91% versus 79% (p<0.05); specificity, 76% versus 85%; and diagnostic accuracy, 88% versus 80% (p<0.05), respectively. We conclude that despite poor image quality on exercise echocardiography, better diagnostic accuracy was attained by assessing wall motion changes at peak-exercise than at post-exercise.

[Exercise echocardiography to differentiate dilated cardiomyopathy from ischemic left ventricular dysfunction]

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown the usefulness of dobutamine echocardiography to differentiate dilated cardiomyopathy (DC) from ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ILVD), but no studies have been made using exercise echocardiography (EE). We hypothesized that most patients with DC have some contractile reserve and experience an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during exercise, as opposed to patients with ILVD. Differences in response to EE may be useful to clinically differentiate between these two entities.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Between 1 March 1995 and 1 March 2001, we performed 4,133 EE studies on 3,830 patients. Of 289 patients (8%) with moderate or severe LV dysfunction (biplane LVEF < 41% and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter > 5.2 cm), 207 were excluded: 111 for a history of myocardial infarction; 28 for scarring on echocardiography (regional akinesia/dyskinesia with thinning and/or increased brightness); 13 for previous revascularization procedures; 9 for aortic valve disease; 11 for a known cause of cardiomyopathy; and 35 for not undergoing angiography. The study group was therefore composed of 82 patients who were encouraged to perform maximal treadmill EE. EE criteria for ILVD were either impaired regional wall motion (RWM) or a decrease/no change in LVEF from baseline to peak exercise, while criteria for DC were RWM improvement/no change and LVEF increase. The ILVD group was formed by 39 patients with stenosis >/= 70% diameter stenosis of a major epicardial coronary artery or major branch vessel. The remaining 43 patients constituted the DC group.

RESULTS

The number of coronary risk factors (ILVD 2.0 1.1; DC 1.9 1.1), baseline LVEF (ILVD 30 7; DC 30 8), and exercise-induced angina (ILVD 23%; DC 14%) did not differ between groups (p = NS). ILVD patients achieved less Mets (6.6 3.1 vs 8.3 2.8; p < 0.05), had a lower heart rate x systolic blood pressure product (22 5 vs 27 7; p < 0.001), and developed regional and/or global LV dysfunction more frequently (79 vs 28%; p < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and global accuracy for ILVD detection were 79% (95% CI: 70-88), 72% (95% CI: 63-81), 72% (95% CI: 63-81), 79% (95% CI: 67-85), and 76% (95% CI: 69-83), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Global and/or regional LV function impairment with exercise is accurate in identifying patients with ILVD. This method could reduce the need for invasive procedures.

Right ventricular pressure dynamics during exercise: relationship to stress echocardiography

Thorough evaluation of myocardial function remains difficult to evaluate under exercising conditions. This study described right ventricular (RV) pressure dynamics during and immediately following exercise. Nine Thoroughbreds without evidence of cardiac disease completed treadmill exercise at 110% of the speed necessary to elicit VO2max while RV pressures were recorded. RV pressure dynamics were calculated at rest, maximal speed and at 10 s intervals for 2 min after exercise. Stress echocardiography was performed at rest and within 120 s after exercise. Mean dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin values were significantly greater at maximal speed and up to 30 s immediately postexercise than at rest and all time points from 60 to 120 s postexercise. Mean dP/dtmax and dP/dtmin were not significantly different from resting values after 60 s postexercise. Tau (the time constant for ventricular relaxation) decreased significantly with exercise, but was not significantly different from rest at time points from 60 to 120 s following exercise. Mean % fractional shortening (FS) increased postexercise; however, the coefficient of variability was large. Wall motion indices also showed large variability postexercise. These temporal changes in normal horses suggest that exercising RV pressure dynamics may provide a better estimation of cardiac function during exercise than postexercise stress echocardiography.

Utility and limitation of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenosis in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction

This clinical study examines the diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography for detecting significant coronary stenoses in infarct-related arteries in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Quantitative coronary angiography and exercise echocardiography using treadmill testing were performed within 2 weeks of each other in 123 patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Coronary lumen diameter stenosis > or =50% by quantitative coronary angiography and the lack of a hyperdynamic response on exercise echocardiography was considered significant. For detection of infarct-related coronary lesions, treadmill exercise echocardiography was highly sensitive (91%) but less specific (59%) than for detection of non-infarct-related artery lesions. The 2 groups of patients with large and small infarct sites had similar sensitivity for detection of residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery (88% vs 96%, p = NS); however, the specificity of the small infarct sites for this purpose was significantly higher than that of the large infarct sites (86% vs 33%, p < 0.01). When remote ischemia was detected on exercise echocardiography, the specificity of exercise echocardiography was significantly lower (33% vs 70%, p < 0.05) than when remote ischemia was not present. Thus, although there is high sensitivity, the specificity of treadmill exercise echocardiography for detecting infarct-related artery lesions is limited. However, high specificity is maintained when the infarct size is small and/or remote ischemia is not present.

Early dobutamine echocardiography for the assessment of coronary stenosis after first Q-wave myocardial infarction

We assessed the accuracy of early dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect infarct-related coronary artery and multivessel disease in patients with first Q wave myocardial infarction after withdrawal of cardioactive drugs. Dobutamine-atropine echocardiography was performed in 91 consecutive patients (mean age 59+/-6 years) 7+/-4 days after myocardial infarction. Dobutamine was infused at incremental doses of 5, 10, 20, 30 to 40 microg/kg/min each one dose for 3 min. Peak heart rate was 134+/-17 bpm. All patients underwent coronary angiography before discharge. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ischemic and biphasic response to detect residual stenosis of infarct-related coronary artery were 70, 92 and 73%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ischemic or biphasic response were similar in the vascular territories of left anterior descending (74, 86 and 75%, respectively), right (67, 100 and 70%, respectively) and circumflex coronary arteries (64, 100, and 69%, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of heterozonal wall motion abnormalities for multivessel coronary artery disease were 64, 82 and 76%, respectively. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific in detecting residual coronary stenosis and multivessel disease in patients with first Q-wave myocardial infarction. The test is safe even without pharmacological protection.

The clinical use of imaging techniques with exercise testing

The addition of nuclear imaging techniques to basic exercise electrocardiography (ECG) has provided significant diagnostic and prognostic information in the evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. During the last decade, new classes of isotopes (technetium-and rubidium-based perfusion agents) and refinements in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have become better accepted. These new studies have added to the diagnostic armamentarium available to physicians, but at considerable costs with an estimated 4.8 million procedures performed this year. Nuclear imaging techniques can assess myocardial blood flow (perfusion imaging) or function (ventriculography). Another imaging modality, stress echocardiography, has also achieved widespread acceptance with clinical guidelines for its use published in 1997. This review addresses these imaging techniques in diagnostic evaluation of the patient with suspected coronary artery disease.

Stress echocardiography: technical considerations

Stress echocardiography has evolved into a widely practiced and accepted method for the noninvasive assessment of the status of the coronary anatomy. Furthermore, this modality incorporates the ability to assess left ventricular function, valvular structure and function, intracardiac masses, the pericardium, and hemodynamics. The extent to which this tool can reliably provide useful clinical information is dependent, in part, on optimal performance. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of those technical considerations that can contribute to the successful operation of a stress echocardiography laboratory. Consideration is given to personnel qualifications, functional requirements of the digital acquisition/storage/replay system, functional integration of the various hardware components, characteristics of the software, physical layout of the facility, and alternatives to treadmill exercise as the stressor. A thorough understanding of the physiologic basis of stress echocardiography, coupled with optimization of resources used in its performance, enable this tool to be an extraordinarily useful and cost-efficient method for comprehensive cardiovascular assessment.

Cost-effectiveness and accuracy of exercise stress echocardiography in the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is a more recent form of totally non-invasive stress testing which like exercise thallium SPECT scintigraphy (ETS) was developed to overcome the known limitations of ECG stress testing, namely the limited diagnostic accuracy and the inability of ECG stress testing to site the region of coronary artery disease (CAD) induced ischaemia.

AIMS

To determine the sensitivity and specificity (and overall accuracy) of ESE in a group of patients referred for ETS imaging and compare the relative costs of each technique.

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen patients referred for ETS consented to a simultaneous ESE. Of this group, 59 patients underwent coronary angiography which was utilised as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The feasibility of ESE was 97% (112 of 115 patients of the total study population and 57 of the 59 patients who underwent coronary angiography). Of the 59 patients undergoing coronary angiography, the sensitivity of ESE and ETS were not significantly different (84.1% versus 91.3% respectively). However, despite the apparent marked difference in specificity (92.3% versus 61.5% respectively), p = NS (Fisher's exact test) as there were only 13 normals in the group who underwent coronary angiography. Overall accuracy was also closely similar (86.0% versus 84.7% respectively) and therefore also not significantly different. By contrast, agreement with coronary angiography as measured by the kappa statistic (kappa +/- SEk) was good for ESE (0.66 +/- 0.11) but only moderate for ETS (0.54 +/- 0.13). Moreover, there was a cost saving of at least $594.00 per patient in favour of ESE.

CONCLUSION

ESE is a totally non-invasive, sensitive, specific and cost-effective imaging modality for the detection and localisation of CAD.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of stress echocardiography in stable patients

Stress echocardiography is an effective diagnostic and prognostic technique in stable patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction, or chronic left ventricular dysfunction and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events regardless of the clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Stress echocardiography provides incremental prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable to that from radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for one-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Accuracy of exercise echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease in left bundle branch block unassociated with either acute or healed myocardial infarction

To search for the value of treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of coronary artery disease in noninfarcted patients with left bundle branch block, we studied 35 patients (17 with coronary artery disease). We found high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (76%, 83%, and 80%, respectively).

Comparison of treadmill exercise echocardiography before and after exercise in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the feasibility and accuracy of peak treadmill exercise echocardiography versus postexercise echocardiography imaging.

BACKGROUND

Although peak exercise echocardiography has been reported for both supine and orthostatic bicycle exercise and has shown higher sensitivity than postexercise imaging, acquiring images at peak exercise with treadmill has not been explored.

METHODS

Peak and post-treadmill exercise echocardiography and coronary angiography were performed on 89 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Positive exercise echocardiography was defined as necrosis or ischemic response. Positive coronary angiography was defined as >/=1 diseased vessels (>/=50% luminal narrowing). Images were analyzed in a blind manner by an expert observer.

RESULTS

Postexercise images were acquired within 80 seconds after exercise (40 +/- 14). Mean heart rate (bpm) was 139 +/- 22 at peak versus 118 +/- 25 at postexercise imaging (P <.001). Interpretable peak and postexercise images were obtained for all 89 patients. Of the 72 classified as having positive exercise echocardiography, 23 had new regional wall motion abnormality at peak (21 with positive angiography), which resolved at postexercise imaging. Sensitivity was higher with peak than with postexercise imaging (94% vs 73%, P <.001). Specificity was similar (68% vs 79%), as was predictive positive value (92% vs 93%). Negative predictive value was again higher with peak imaging (76% vs 44%, P <.05). Total accuracy was higher with peak imaging (89% vs 74%, P <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Peak treadmill exercise echocardiography is technically feasible and has higher sensitivity and accuracy than post-treadmill exercise echocardiography. Therefore in the clinical setting peak exercise echocardiography should be performed to diagnose ischemia.

Safety profile and hemodynamic responses to beta-adrenergic stimulation by dobutamine in heart transplant patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has been used as a screening tool for coronary artery disease after heart transplantation and in the identification of patients at risk for development of cardiac events. However, the safety profile of high-dose dobutamine in heart transplant patients has not been systematically examined. Accordingly, we studied the safety profile and hemodynamic responses to escalating doses of dobutamine to determine the influence of denervation.

DESIGN

We assessed the hemodynamic responses, heart rate (HR), and arterial BP indexes (mean arterial pressure, systolic BP [SBP], diastolic BP [DBP], and pulse pressure) to dobutamine in 87 heart transplant patients ([mean +/- SD] age, 51 +/- 1 years) and compared the results with 97 nontransplant patients (age, 63.0 +/- 1 years) who served as innervated control subjects.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The baseline HR (84 +/- 2 vs 69 +/- 1 beats/minute, respectively; p < 0.001) and peak HR response (144 +/- 2 vs 117 +/- 2 beats/minute, respectively; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in heart transplant patients than in the nontransplant patients. SBP was lower in heart transplant patients than in nontransplant patients at baseline (131 +/- 2 vs 138 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.02) and at peak (150 +/- 3 vs 158 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.03). However, baseline DBP was higher in transplant patients than in nontransplant patients (86 +/- 1 vs 77 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.001). The decrease in DBP was similar in both groups (15 mm Hg). The dose-response curve for HR was shifted leftward in heart transplant patients. Heart transplant patients attained a higher absolute HR at each infusion stage and higher rates of increase, but the decrease in DBP was not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that there is augmented chronotropic response and expected decline in DBP in response to dobutamine infusion in heart transplant patients. This increase in myocardial oxygen demand and a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure may be important mechanisms in the development of ischemic abnormalities that are detectable as regional dysynergy on echocardiography.

A perspective on standardizing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests by likelihood ratio computation: 2. Clinical applications

Likelihood ratio measures may be used as a standard for expressing the predictive power of noninvasive cardiovascular tests, calculated from sensitivity and specificity measures or as ratios of the predictive value odds to pretest odds for positive and negative test results. The positive likelihood ratio, (+)LR, expresses the power of a positive test result to augment an estimate of disease probability independent of the pretest prevalence of disease in a given population; the negative likelihood ratio, (-)LR, expresses the power of a negative test result to augment an estimate of the probability of no disease independent of the pretest prevalence of no disease in the same population. The likelihood ratio principle is applicable to the evaluation of the predictive power of single or combined test results reported for either dichotomous or continuous end points. This part of the perspective exemplifies application of the likelihood ratio principle in a wide variety of testing conditions for coronary artery disease followed by a discussion of the limitations of likelihood ratio computation in test power evaluation. Likelihood ratios provide a more concise and unambiguous standard for calibrating the predictive power of single and combined noninvasive cardiovascular test results than are provided by measures of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value.

Aortic regurgitation reduces the accuracy of exercise echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease

The association of aortic regurgitation with left ventricular size, hypertrophy, and abnormal coronary flow may influence the accuracy of stress testing techniques for the diagnosis of coronary disease. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of treadmill exercise echocardiography to predict coronary artery disease in 76 patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation. Rest and poststress images were interpreted by 2 experienced observers, and accuracy was defined by comparison with stenoses >/=50% diameter at coronary angiography. Results were compared with accuracy in a control group of previously published studies in patients without valvular heart disease. After 6 patients were excluded because of a submaximal heart rate response (<85% age-predicted maximal heart rate), 70 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with aortic regurgitation were of comparable age to the control group and exercised to similar workload. In 16 (23%) patients with significant coronary artery disease and significant aortic regurgitation, the sensitivity of exercise echocardiography was 56% compared with 83% in the control group (P =.03). The specificity in 54 patients with aortic regurgitation but no significant coronary artery disease was 67% compared with 83% in the control group (P =.02). Accuracy was 64% in aortic regurgitation compared with 83% in the control group (P =.02). In patients with aortic regurgitation, accuracy in the left anterior descending artery territory (76%) marginally exceeded that in the posterior (right + circumflex coronary artery) circulation (70%). Thus the presence of significant aortic regurgitation affects the regional wall motion of the left ventricle during exercise and adversely affects the accuracy of exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Use of Stress Echocardiography and Radionuclide Scintigraphy

Stress echocardiography and radionuclide scintigraphy are effective diagnostic and prognostic techniques in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), chronic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Both are sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events irrespective of clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Both provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable with radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for single-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Advances in Exercise Echocardiography Can This Technique Still Thrive in the Era of Pharmacologic Stress Testing?

In the current literature, pharmacologic stress techniques are the focus of interest and excitement regarding new technologies and new indications such as the diagnosis of viable myocardium. In contrast, exercise echocardiography has evolved less and is less amenable to the introduction of new technologies. This article reviews the indications for exercise echocardiography (especially in contrast to pharmacologic stress), its accuracy relative to other testing, and application to clinical decision making. Exercise echocardiography remains to be well accepted as a diagnostic and risk-assessment technique, and in some clinical situations it provides valuable data that are not available during pharmacologic stress testing.

Exercise echocardiography. Principles, methods, and clinical use

Stress echocardiography is composed of a family of examinations in which various forms of cardiovascular stress are combined with echocardiographic imaging to assist in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Exercise cardiography has evolved over the past 20 years into a routinely available clinical tool employed in both university and community hospital settings. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of using exercise echocardiography.

Optimal criteria for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography

The diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) on the basis of inducible ischemia in > or = 2, rather than 1, segments was suggested to improve specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). However, the impact of using these criteria on the sensitivity and accuracy of DSE was not studied. We studied the accuracy of DSE (up to 40 microg/kg/min) for the diagnosis of CAD in 290 patients with suspected myocardial ischemia using the criteria of > or = 1 and > or = 2 ischemic segments. Ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities using a 16-segment model. Among the 85 patients without previous myocardial infarction, significant CAD was detected in 51 (60%). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DSE using > or = 1 ischemic segment were 73%, 85%, and 78%, respectively. Those using > or = 2 segments were 67%, 94%, and 78%, respectively (p = NS). Regional specificity improved by using > or = 2 segments (91% vs 96%, p <0.05) at the expense of an equivalent reduction in regional sensitivity (60% vs 44%, p <0.05), whereas the regional accuracy was similar (80% vs 79% for > or = 1 and > or = 2 segments, respectively). In the 205 patients with previous myocardial infarction, the criterion of ischemia in > or = 1 segment had a higher sensitivity and accuracy for overall diagnosis of CAD (75% vs 64%, p <0.05; 77% vs 68%, p <0.05), infarct-related CAD (64% vs 47%, p <0.005; 70% vs 57%, p <0.01), and remote CAD (74% vs 57%, p <0.005; 78% vs 69%, p <0.05) than the criterion of > or = 2 segments, respectively. It is concluded that in patients without previous myocardial infarction, the use of > or = 2 ischemic segments by DSE for the diagnosis of CAD does not improve the accuracy of DSE compared with the criterion of > or = 1 ischemic segment. Conversely, in patients with previous infarction the use of > or = 2 segments reduces the overall and regional sensitivity and accuracy without a significant improvement in specificity.

Stress Echocardiography: A Review of the Principles and Practice

Stress echocardiography, both pharmacologic and physiological, is an established noninvasive diagnostic method of detecting coronary artery disease. It also has a role in the assessment of patients with chest pain, the assessment of cardiovascular risk before noncardiac surgery, the assessment of patients after a myocardial infarction, the detection of viability in dysfunctional myocardium, and the prediction of functional recovery. The prognostic value of stress echocardiography is emerging. In this article, we discuss the methodology, diagnostic accuracy, and various clinical applications of stress echocardiography. We also review its limitations and compared it with other noninvasive methods of assessing patients with coronary artery disease.

Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare the value and limitations of exercise testing, dipyridamole echocardiography, dobutamine-atropine echocardiography, and MIBI-SPECT (technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl nitrile single photon emission computed tomography) during dobutamine infusion in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

DESIGN

The performance of these four tests was assessed in random order on a consecutive cohort of patients. The presence or absence of coronary artery disease was confirmed by coronary angiography.

SETTING

Two tertiary care and university centres.

PATIENTS

102 consecutive patients with chest pain and no previous history of coronary artery disease. Ten patients with left bundle branch block were excluded for further analysis of exercise testing and scintigraphy results.

RESULTS

MIBI-SPECT was the most sensitive (87%) but the least specific test (70%). Exercise stress testing had a sensitivity of 66%, which increased to 80% when patients with inconclusive results were excluded. Dipyridamole and dobutamine echocardiography had similar sensitivity (81%, 78%) and specificity (94%, 88%). All four tests had similar accuracy and positive and negative predictive values. Agreement between the echocardiographic techniques was excellent (detection of coronary artery disease 87%, kappa = 0.72; regional analysis 93%, kappa = 0.72; diagnosis of the "culprit" vessel 95%, kappa = 0.92), and it was good between echocardiographic techniques and MIBI-SPECT (diagnosis of the culprit vessel 90%, kappa = 0.84 with dobutamine and 92%, kappa = 0.85 with dipyridamole).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise stress testing has a sensitivity comparable to other tests in patients capable of exercising and with no basal electrical abnormalities. The greatest sensitivity is offered by MIBI-SPECT and the greatest specificity is obtained with stress echocardiography. Redundant information is obtained with dipyridamole echocardiography, dobutamine echocardiography, and MIBI-SPECT.

Physiological and pathological aspects of exercise left ventricular function

Measures of left ventricular function during exercise provide information that is more accurate than the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, supportive of the data provided by myocardial perfusion studies, and of great prognostic significance. We review basic methods for evaluating left ventricular function during exercise and responses to various types of exercise, including incremental exercise and exercise training conditions. Additionally, we review changes in both incremental exercise test responses and responses to training in various pathological conditions. Case reports are included to illustrate the utility of measuring left ventricular function during exercise.

Risk stratification of patients with medically treated unstable angina using exercise echocardiography

Functional testing is recommended for risk stratification of medically treated patients with unstable angina. Exercise echocardiography is used in this situation, but its safety and prognostic value are not well defined. The objective of this study was to assess the incremental prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in 226 consecutive patients (128 men, age 59+/-13 years) with medically treated unstable angina, who underwent exercise echocardiography from 1991 to 1996. Clinical risk was designated as low in 108 patients, intermediate in 116, and high in 2 patients according to the unstable angina practice guidelines. There were no major complications from the stress tests. The exercise electrocardiogram was nondiagnostic in 57 patients (25%). Ischemia was identified by exercise electrocardiography in 33 patients and exercise echocardiography in 55 patients. Patients were followed for 29+/-18 months. After exclusion of 38 patients who underwent early revascularization, 28 patients had cardiac death, nonfatal infarction, and late (>3 months) revascularization. Ischemia at exercise echocardiography was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 81%, compared to 95% with negative exercise echocardiography (p=0.02). A positive exercise electrocardiogram was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 84%, compared to 93% with negative exercise electrocardiograms (p=0.08). In a Cox regression model, event-free survival was predicted by ischemia at exercise echocardiography (relative risk 2.8, confidence interval: 1.3 to 6.3, p=0.05), but not at exercise electrocardiography (relative risk 2.1, confidence interval 0.7 to 5.8, p=0.16).

Usefulness of exercise echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in an outpatient population

The prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in an outpatient population is not well defined. A total of 1,020 consecutive patients referred for exercise echocardiography in an ambulatory care setting were studied by reviewing their medical records and exercise echocardiographic data. Of these, 71 (7%) were excluded due to technically inadequate tests, leaving 949 patients who were included in the analysis. A positive exercise echocardiogram (EE) was defined as an appearance of a new wall motion abnormality or worsening of a baseline abnormality. Cardiac events, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery, and death, were documented during a 12-month follow-up period. Cardiac events occurred in 17% of patients (26 of 152) with a positive exercise echocardiogram (EE) and in 2.5% (20 of 797) with a negative EE (p <0.001). The incidence of myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 0.4%, p <0.02), coronary angioplasty (7% vs 1%, p <0.001), and coronary bypass surgery (9% vs 1%, p <0.001) were higher in patients with a positive versus a negative EE. There was 1 death in the positive study group and none in the negative group. Significant independent variables (p <0.05) that predicted cardiac events included a positive exercise electrocardiogram, history of coronary angioplasty, nonspecific ST-T changes on the baseline electrocardiogram, double product <25,000, men, chest pain on exercise test, and a positive exercise electrocardiogram. On a stepwise logistic regression model, exercise echocardiography emerged as an independent predictor of future cardiac events in an outpatient population. This predictive value was enhanced in the presence of a positive exercise electrocardiogram compared with a negative exercise electrocardiogram (24.2% vs 7.9%, p <0.03). Our study suggests that exercise echocardiography is an independent predictor of future cardiac events in an outpatient population.

Stress echocardiography: recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography. Stress Echocardiography Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography

Cardiovascular stress testing remains the mainstay of provocative evaluation for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Stress echocardiography has become a valuable means of cardiovascular stress testing. It plays a crucial role in the initial detection of coronary disease, in determining prognosis, and in therapeutic decision making. The purpose of this document is to outline the recommended methodology for stress echocardiography with respect to personnel and equipment as well as the clinical use of this recently developed technique. Specific limitations will also be discussed.

Comparison of dobutamine and treadmill exercise echocardiography in inducing ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the magnitude of ischemia precipitated by both treadmill exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Although it is alleged that dobutamine stress produces ischemia similar in degree and extent to that produced during treadmill exercise, a direct comparison with treadmill exercise, the most common form of exercise, has not been performed.

METHODS

Eighty-five consecutive patients with known coronary artery disease underwent both stress tests on the same day, in random order.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (73%) had positive results on exercise echocardiography compared with 53 (62%) who had positive results on dobutamine stress (p = NS). Of the 53 patients with positive dobutamine test results, wall motion abnormalities appeared after the addition of atropine in 35 patients (66%). During dobutamine infusion, 22 patients (26%) had a hypotensive response that was reversed in 16 by prompt administration of atropine. At peak dobutamine-atropine stress, heart rate was higher than that at peak exercise (p < 0.001), whereas systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product were higher at peak exercise than at peak dobutamine-atropine stress (p = 0.0001). In the 53 patients with positive results on both tests, peak wall motion score index was greater with treadmill exercise than with dobutamine-atropine infusion ([mean +/- SD] 1.73 +/- 0.45 vs. 1.57 +/- 0.44, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiography immediately after treadmill exercise induces a greater ischemic burden than dobutamine-atropine infusion. In the clinical setting, exercise echocardiography should therefore be chosen over dobutamine echocardiography for diagnosing ischemia, when possible. When dobutamine echocardiography is used as an alternative modality, maximal heart rate should always be achieved by the addition of atropine.