Percutaneous treatment of protected and unprotected left main coronary stenoses with new devices: immediate angiographic results and intermediate-term follow-up

Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program

The practice patterns and outcomes of protected left main (PLM) and unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well defined in contemporary US clinical practice. Data were collected from all Veteran Affairs catheterization laboratories participating in the Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program between 2009 and 2019. The analysis included 4,351 patients who underwent left main PCI, of whom 1,306 pairs of PLM and ULM PCI were included in a propensity-matched cohort. Selected temporal trends were also assessed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcomes at 1 year, which was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), rehospitalization for stroke, or urgent revascularization. Patients who underwent ULM PCI compared with patients who underwent PLM PCI were older (age 71.5 vs 69.2 years, p <0.001), more clinically complex, and more likely to present with acute coronary syndrome. In the propensity-matched cohort, radial access was used more often for ULM PCI (21% [273] vs 14% [185], p <0.001) and ULM PCI was more likely to involve the left main bifurcation (22% vs 14%, p = 0.003) and require mechanical circulatory support (10% [134] vs 1% [17], p <0.001). The 1-year MACEs occurred more frequently with ULM PCI than PLM PCI (22% [289] vs 16% [215], p ≤0.001) and all-cause mortality was also higher (16% [213] vs 10% [125], p ≤0.001). In the matched cohort, there was a low incidence of rehospitalization for MI (4% [48] ULM vs 4% [48] PLM, p = 1.000) or revascularization (7% [94] ULM vs 6% [84] PLM, p = 0.485). In this real-world experience, patients who underwent PLM PCI had better 1-year outcomes than those who underwent ULM PCI; however, in both groups, there was a high rate of mortality and MACEs at 1 year despite a relatively low rate of MI or revascularization.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the VA CART Program

Background

Practice patterns and outcomes of protected left main (PLM) and unprotected left main (ULM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as well as the differences between these types of PCI, are not well defined in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

Data collected from all Veteran Affairs (VA) catheterization laboratories participating in the Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program between 2009 and 2019. The analysis included 4,351 patients undergoing left main PCI, of which 1,306 pairs of PLM and ULM PCI were included in a propensity matched cohort. Patients and procedural characteristics were compared between PLM and ULM PCI. Temporal trends were also assessed. Peri-procedural and one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared using cumulative incidence plots. The primary outcome was MACE outcomes at 1-year, which was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI), rehospitalization for stroke or urgent revascularization.

Results

ULM PCI patients in comparison to PLM PCI were older (71.5 vs 69.2; P < 0.001), more clinically complex and more likely to present with ACS. In the propensity matched cohort, radial access was used more often for ULM PCI (21% [273] vs. 14% [185], P < 0.001), and ULM PCI was more likely to involve the LM bifurcation (22% vs 14%; P = 0.003) and require mechanical circulatory support (10% [134] vs 1% [17]; P <0.001). One-year MACE occurred more frequently with ULM PCI compared to PLM PCI (22% [289] vs. 16% [215]; P = < 0.001) and all-cause mortality was also higher (16% [213] vs. 10% [125]; P = < 0.001). In the matched cohort there was a low incidence of rehospitalization for MI (4% [48] ULM vs. 4% [48] PLM; P = 1.000) or revascularization (7% [94] ULM vs. 6% [84] PLM; P = 0.485).

Conclusions

Veterans undergoing PLM PCI had better one-year outcomes than those undergoing ULM PCI, but in both groups there was a high rate of mortality and MACE at one-year despite a relatively low rate of MI or revascularization.

Hanging by a thread-urgent coronary artery bypass grafting for ST elevation myocardial infarction in a patient with isolated left main coronary artery disease

A 78-year-old man presented with a left main stenosis as the culprit lesion in an acute myocardial infarction. He had no significant narrowing in any other coronary territory. This case describes findings in an isolated left main myocardial infarction and discusses appropriate treatment strategies.

[Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: immediate and medium-term outcomes of 24 procedures]

OBJECTIVES

We have examined the immediate and long-term patient outcomes following angioplasty of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses.

BACKGROUND

Coronary disease of the unprotected left main artery is considered as an absolute contraindication for percutaneous intervention. Recently, several studies have reported good results with unprotected left main coronary artery stenting when surgical revascularization was contraindicated.

METHODS

From October 2004 to June 2006, 24 patients with a contraindication to surgery and with unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses received stents. Patients were surveyed at one, six and 12 months with telephone interviews.

RESULTS

The procedure's success rate was 100%. The percentage of stenosis and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) were respectively 63.4% (+/-15.4) and 1.1mm (+/-0.5) before procedure; 13.8% (+/-10.2) and 3.2mm (+/-0.5) after angioplasty. The size of stents averaged 3.79 mm (+/-0.46) with an average 1.04 stents per patient. During follow up, two deaths occurred (8.3%). No intrastent restenosis was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses may be a safe and effective alternative to coronary artery bypass especially when surgical revascularization is contraindicated. However, further studies with larger patient populations are needed to assess the late outcome and to clarify the relevance of percutaneous intervention compared to surgery.

Coronary angioplasty in drug eluting stent era for the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis compared to coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Improved outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) have resulted in their expanded use for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis.

AIM

We compared outcomes of patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCA stenosis and patients treated by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHOD

Between January 2005 and January 2007, 6705 patients were studied with coronary angiography in northern Finland. All subjects treated with revascularization of LMCA stenosis (n = 287) were included and followed up for a mean of 12+6 months.

RESULTS

From 287 patients, 238 underwent CABG, and 49 had PCI with DES. The incidence of 1-year mortality was 4% among the PCI-treated and 11% among CABG-treated patients (P = 0.136). After the first month, mortality among PCI-or CABG-treated patients did not differ statistically significantly (2% versus 7%, P = 0.133). The most significant independent predictor of mortality was reduced left ventricular systolic function (hazard ratio 14.9, 95% CI 5.5-40.0, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI with DES for selected LMCA disease patients results in short- and midterm outcomes comparable to results of CABG in general. PCI is a viable therapeutic option in selected patients with LMCA stenosis.

Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Angiographic assessment of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS) is often difficult and unreliable. We aimed to evaluate the severity of ambiguous LMCSs by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and to clarify how frequently significant stenosis occurs in the "real world".

METHODS

We retrospectively found 115 consecutive patients in our clinical IVUS database with a de novo, angiographically ambiguous, intermediate LMCS who underwent IVUS evaluation. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and IVUS analyses were performed. We define a significant LMCS as a diameter stenosis >50% by QCA and a minimal lumen area <6.0 mm2 by IVUS.

RESULTS

Ostial, mid, and distal LMCSs were seen in 44 (38.3%), 6 (5.2%), and 65 (56.5%) lesions. Overall, IVUS minimal lumen area and plaque burden measured 6.8 +/- 2.6 mm2 and 63% +/- 14%. A significant LMCS was seen in 51 (44.3%) lesions by IVUS but in only 15 (13.0%) lesions by QCA. In particular, only 36.4% of ostial lesions had a significant IVUS stenosis, and minimal lumen diameter by QCA was less well correlated with IVUS in ostial lesions than in other lesion locations.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world IVUS analysis showed that less than half of intermediate LMCSs had significant stenoses by IVUS assessment, especially for lesions located at the left main ostium. Such patients deserve IVUS assessment or physiologic assessment before blindly proceeding to revascularization.

Left main coronary artery stenosis: state-of-the-art

Patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery present difficult challenges. The risks associated with this lesion have been known since the early days of angiography when patients were found to have increased mortality during follow-up. This information led to the general guidelines that surgical revascularization should be considered the treatment of choice in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis. Current advances in invasive cardiology have brought important information to the field. Intravascular ultrasound is now used routinely to evaluate angiographically indeterminate lesions with criteria now set forward as to what constitutes an indication for revascularization. Stents have even further dramatically changed the landscape. There are substantial issues, however, that need to addressed. These include the following: (1) the effect of specific lesion location on outcome - it is known that patients with distal bifurcation left main disease have worse outcome; (2) the potential for subacute thrombosis of the left main coronary artery; (3) the impact of left ventricular function and patient comorbidities irrespective of the degree and location of left main coronary artery stenosis; and (4) the risk-benefit ratio of stenting versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These issues are currently being addressed in two seminally important trials including the SYNTAX trial, which randomizes patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease to either coronary artery bypass graft surgery or a TAXUS drug-eluting stent. This trial is in the final stages of patient recruitment and will have important implications for the field. The other trial is the COMBAT trial, which is focused exclusively on left main coronary artery stenosis and randomizes patients with left main coronary artery disease either to a Sirolimus-eluting stent (Cypher, Johnson and Johnson Cordis, USA) or to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The field of left main coronary artery disease continues to expand in terms of the evidence available for optimal patient evaluation and selection of treatment modalities.

[Left main coronary artery angioplasty: report of five cases illustrating the current indications]

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study is to illustrate by five original observations the various situations where the stenting of the left main coronary artery can be proposed in alternative to aortocoronary bridging with encouraging results in short- and long-term.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a retrospective study relating to five cases with left main disease treated by stenting between 1996 and 2002 at our institution. In two cases the left main stem was unprotected. In two other cases, the left main trunk was protected. And the last case was an emergency stenting for an iatrogenic dissection of the left main coronary artery.

RESULTS

The stenting was carried out successfully among the five patients without major in-hospital complication. During the follow-up of 29 months at mean, no death was deplored, and no target lesion revascularization was required on the left main coronary artery (with a left main trunk permeable on three coronarographic controls).

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of these results, and basing on the published data, we conclude that stenting for the left main coronary disease may be a safe and effective alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in particular cases among "selected" patients (refusal or surgical contraindication, protected left main coronary artery, spontaneous or iatrogenic acute occlusion of the left main coronary artery).

Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

The introduction and widespread use of coronary stents have been the most important advancement in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. Coronary artery stents reduce the rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty. This angiographic restenosis was further reduced with the introduction of drug-eluting stents and hence further reduction in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events. Herein we present a comprehensive and up-to-date review about the use of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

In patients with stable CAD, PCI can be considered a valuable initial mode of revascularization in all patients with objective large ischaemia in the presence of almost every lesion subset, with only one exception: chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed. In early studies, there was a small survival advantage with CABG surgery compared with PCI without stenting. The addition of stents and newer adjunctive medications improved the outcome for PCI. The decision to recommend PCI or CABG surgery will be guided by technical improvements in cardiology or surgery, local expertise, and patients' preference. However, until proved otherwise, PCI should be used only with reservation in diabetics with multi-vessel disease and in patients with unprotected left main stenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents might change this situation. Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS (UA or NSTEMI) have to be stratified first for their risk of acute thrombotic complications. A clear benefit from early angiography (<48 h) and, when needed, PCI or CABG surgery has been reported only in the high-risk groups. Deferral of intervention does not improve outcome. Routine stenting is recommended on the basis of the predictability of the result and its immediate safety. In patients with STEMI, primary PCI should be the treatment of choice in patients presenting in a hospital with PCI facility and an experienced team. Patients with contra-indications to thrombolysis should be immediately transferred for primary PCI, because this might be their only chance for quickly opening the coronary artery. In cardiogenic shock, emergency PCI for complete revascularization may be life-saving and should be considered at an early stage. Compared with thrombolysis, randomized trials that transferred the patients for primary PCI to a 'heart attack centre' observed a better clinical outcome, despite transport times leading to a significantly longer delay between randomization and start of the treatment. The superiority of primary PCI over thrombolysis seems to be especially clinically relevant for the time interval between 3 and 12 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms on the basis of its superior preservation of myocardium. Furthermore, with increasing time to presentation, major-adverse-cardiac-event rates increase after thrombolysis, but appear to remain relatively stable after primary PCI. Within the first 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms, both reperfusion strategies seem equally effective in reducing infarct size and mortality. Therefore, thrombolysis is still a viable alternative to primary PCI, if it can be delivered within 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms. Primary PCI compared with thrombolysis significantly reduced stroke. Overall, we prefer primary PCI over thrombolysis in the first 3 h of chest pain to prevent stroke, and in patients presenting 3-12 h after the onset of chest pain, to salvage myocardium and also to prevent stroke. At the moment, there is no evidence to recommend facilitated PCI. Rescue PCI is recommended, if thrombolysis failed within 45-60 min after starting the administration. After successful thrombolysis, the use of routine coronary angiography within 24 h and PCI, if applicable, is recommended even in asymptomatic patients without demonstrable ischaemia to improve patients' outcome. If a PCI centre is not available within 24 h, patients who have received successful thrombolysis with evidence of spontaneous or inducible ischaemia before discharge should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularized accordingly--independent of 'maximal' medical therapy.

Chronic stent recoil plays an important role in restenosis of the right coronary ostium

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of coronary stenting of aorto-ostial atherosclerotic lesions is still unclear. We investigated the frequency and mechanism of stent restenosis at this particular lesion.

METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive patients with 64 native aorto-ostial lesions in the right coronary artery (RCA, n = 38) and the left main trunk (LM, n = 26) were treated by conventional stenting. Determinants of angiographic restenosis were established. The mechanism of stent restenosis was evaluated using post-stenting and follow-up intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings.

RESULTS

Restenosis was more frequent in the RCA than in the LM (50% compared with 19%, P < 0.03) and determinants included diabetes mellitus (63% compared with 21%, P < 0.03), calcium deposition (58% compared with 5%, P < 0.003), smaller stent cross-sectional area (SA) (as demonstrated by post-stenting IVUS studies, 8.1 +/- 1.4 mm compared with 10.2 +/- 2.2 mm, P < 0.01), larger plaque burden (64 +/- 6% compared with 57 +/- 8%, P < 0.03) and less circular expansion at the aorto-coronary junction. Serial IVUS examination was performed in 11 patients with restenosis of the right coronary ostium. The mean reduction in the SA was 21% at the aorto-coronary junction (6.4 +/- 1.9 mm, P < 0.003), whereas the SA at the distal edge was unchanged. Thirty-three per cent of late luminal loss was due to chronic stent recoil.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that stenosis of the right coronary ostium is a high-risk lesion for stent restenosis. In addition to excessive intimal growth, chronic stent recoil might be an important etiologic factor at this particular location.

Elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for left main coronary artery disease: Six-month angiographic follow-up and 1-year clinical outcome

The effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients treated electively for left main (LM) stenoses has not been yet ascertained. The present study reports on the clinical and angiographic outcome of 16 consecutive patients treated electively for de novo stenoses in the LM. The impact of SES implantation on major adverse cardiac events was evaluated. Mean age was 65 +/- 11 years. Unprotected LM was present in nine (56%), and eight patients (50%) received stents extending into both the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries for stenoses of the distal left main bifurcation. In-house mortality and reintervention rate was zero. One patient developed a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction related to the index procedure. At 1-year clinical follow-up, there were no deaths or further myocardial infarctions; one (6%) patient required target lesion revascularization. A total of 12 patients (75%) underwent 6-month angiographic follow-up with a late lumen loss of 0.04 +/- 0.65 mm and one focal restenosis (8% of patients). Elective SES implantation for LM disease was associated with zero mortality and a very low incidence of additional major adverse events at 1 year.

Lesion regression after percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main trunk disease

BACKGROUND

Although some studies have documented the six-month angiographic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new devices for unprotected left main trunk disease (ULMTD), a long-term angiographic analysis is mandatory to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this procedure. This study aims to assess a long-term (one year or more) angiographic analysis after PCI for this lesion.

METHODS

PCI was performed for 225 ULMTD with de novo or restenotic lesions. There were 19 deaths and 12 repeat PCIs during the hospital stay. The remaining 194 lesions were followed, and 126 lesions showed no angiographic restenosis or target lesion revascularization within six months. Finally, long-term quantitative angiographic follow-up was completed in 78 lesions (mean 2.4 years, maximum 7.5 years after PCI).

RESULTS

Minimal lumen diameter increased significantly from 2.46 +/- 0.59 mm to 2.72 +/- 0.65 mm (p < 0.0001) and percent diameter stenosis decreased significantly from 26 +/- 14% to 19 +/- 14% (p < 0.0001) between the six-month and the long-term follow-ups. No additional restenosis or new lesions were found at long-term follow-up, and significant lesion regression was ascertained in each procedure (directional coronary atherectomy, p < 0.005; ballooning, p < 0.005; stenting, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the safety and effectiveness of PCI for ULMTD during the long-term period.

Percutaneous intervention for unprotected left main disease prior to explantation of a left ventricular assist device

Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary arterial disease is an alternative to surgical revascularization in selected patients. In this report, a patient with an implanted left ventricular assist device (LVAD) underwent successful coronary intervention prior to its planned removal. The implanted LVAD clearly assisted the technical performance of the intervention.

The feasibility and safety of early discharge for low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful direct percutaneous coronary intervention

There is a lack of consensus among cardiologists regarding the length of time patients should be hospitalized after an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and successful direct percutaneous coronary intervention (d-PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early discharge (discharge <4 days after the procedure) for low risk patients with AMI who underwent successful d-PCI. From May 1996 through December 2001, d-PCI was performed in 898 consecutive patients with AMI. Of these 898 patients, 463 (51.6%) were stratified to be at low risk. Lower risk was defined as: (1) Killip classification < or = 2 on admission; (2) the infarct-related artery achieved normal blood flow without recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in the first 24 hours; (3) no mechanical or electrical complications after d-PCI. (4) no acute renal failure, acute stroke, or major bleeding complication; (5) no advanced congestive heart failure (defined as > or = New York Heart Association functional class 3); and (6) no sepsis. Patients who were discharged <4 days after undergoing the procedure were enrolled in group 1 (n = 266). Patients who were discharged > or = 4 days after undergoing the procedure were enrolled in group 2 (n = 197). Univariate analysis demonstrated that group 2 patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (P = 0.0001) than group 1 patients. At the first 30-day follow-up examination, there were no significant differences in the combined major cardiac events (death, recurrent isehemia, reinfarction, revascularization. or advanced congestive heart failure) between the group 1 and group 2 patients (1.50% vs 1.52%, P = 0.92). There were also no significant differences in the combined major noncardiac complications (acute stroke, acute renal failure, bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion, vascular sequelae, or sepsis) between the group 1 and group 2 patients (1.13% vs 0.51%. P = 0.89). Early discharge was feasible in a majority of the patients who experienced AMI and were at lower risk 24 hours after successful d-PCI. Thus, the patients had a shortened hospital stay and no increased risk.

Short- and long-term results of emergency and elective percutaneous interventions on left main coronary artery stenoses

In this prospective study, we analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous interventions on significant left main coronary artery (LM) stenoses. Between January 1998 and June 2000, 18 patients underwent emergency interventions on unprotected LM stenoses (group 1), while 15 patients had elective interventions on protected LM stenoses (group 2). Despite a procedural success of 88.9% in group 1, event-free in-hospital and mortality rates were 50.0% and 38.9%. After 6.4 +/- 4.4 months of follow-up, late event-free survival and mortality rates were 33.3% and 38.9%. In group 2, procedural success was 100%, with 100% event-free in-hospital survival; late event-free survival and mortality rates were 93.3% and 0% after 6.7 +/- 4.1 months of follow-up. Emergency interventions on LM stenoses remain a procedure with high acute and mid-term mortality. In spite of the high rate of major adverse cardiac events, an acceptable long-term survival can be achieved.

Elective stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: effect of debulking before stenting and intravascular ultrasound guidance

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate: 1) the long-term outcomes of 127 selected patients receiving unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting; and 2) the impact of the debulking procedure before stenting and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance on their clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

The long-term safety of stenting of unprotected LMCA stenoses has not been established yet.

METHODS

A total of 127 consecutive patients with unprotected LMCA stenosis and normal left ventricular function were treated by elective stenting. The long-term outcomes were evaluated between two groups: IVUS guidance (n = 77) vs. angiographic guidance (n = 50); and debulking plus stenting (debulking/stenting; n = 40) vs. stenting only (n = 87).

RESULTS

Angiographic restenosis was documented in 19 (19%) of 100 patients. The lumen diameter after stenting was significantly larger in IVUS-guided group (p = 0.003). The angiographic restenosis rate was significantly lower in the debulking/stenting group (8.3% vs. 25%, p = 0.034). The reference artery size was the only independent predictor of angiographic restenosis. During follow-up (25.5 +/- 16.7 months), there were four deaths, but no nonfatal myocardial infarctions occurred. The survival rate was 97.0 +/- 1.7% at two years.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that stenting of unprotected LMCA stenosis might be associated with a favorable long-term outcome in selected patients. Guidance with IVUS may optimize the immediate results, and debulking before stenting seems to be effective in reducing the restenosis rate. However, we need a large-scale, randomized study.

Effect of primary angioplasty on total or subtotal left main occlusion: analysis of incidence, clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic determinants

BACKGROUND

Although acute left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion is a rare clinical entity, it carries a very high mortality rate. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect of primary angioplasty for a severely obstructed or totally occluded LMCA, and to determine the incidence, clinical features, outcome, and prognostic determinants in this clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 1993 and July 2000, a total of 740 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent primary angioplasty in our hospital. Eighteen of 740 patients (2.4%) with a severely obstructed or totally occluded LMCA constituted the population of this study.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 18 patients (94.4%) experienced pulmonary edema (including 14 patients in cardiogenic shock). Six patients (33.3%) sustained sudden death due to malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Coronary angiography showed that there were variable grade flow of intercoronary collaterals in 12 patients (66.7%), a totally occluded LMCA in 8 patients (44.4%), an incompletely occluded LMCA in 10 patients (55.6%), and a dominant right coronary artery (RCA) in 16 patients (88.9%). Primary angioplasty of the LMCA was performed with a 72.2% procedural success rate. Four patients (22.2%) received coronary artery bypass surgery after angioplasty. Six patients (33.3%) died in the hospital. Two patients died after discharge. Ten of 18 patients (55.6%) survived in long-term follow-up (mean +/- SD, 44 +/- 14 months). Those patients who survived to be discharged had significantly higher combined coexisting incidence of intercoronary collaterals, dominant RCA, and incompletely occluded LMCA (100% vs 0.0%, p = 0.0006) than those patients who died in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute obstructive LMCA disease generally presented as pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, or sudden death. Only those who had combined coexistence of intercoronary collaterals, a dominant RCA, and an incompletely occluded LMCA could survive to be discharged. Our experience suggests that primary LMCA angioplasty is a feasible and effective procedure, and it may save lives in this clinical setting.

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the stenoses location and morphology in the left main coronary artery in relation to anatomic left main length

Eighty-seven left main stenoses were evaluated by angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Intravascular ultrasound analysis included left main length (bifurcation to ostium), stenosis location, stenosis length, stenosis external elastic membrane, lumen, plaque & media cross-sectional area (CSA), plaque burden (plaque & media/external elastic membrane CSA), calcium arc, calcium length, eccentricity, and remodeling index (stenosis/reference external elastic membrane CSA). Long anatomic left main arteries (length > or =10 mm, n = 43) were compared with short anatomic left main arteries (length <10 mm, n = 44) regarding stenosis location. Ostial (proximal third of left main artery) (n = 32) and nonostial (midthird and distal third) stenoses (n = 55) were compared regarding stenosis morphology. Short anatomic left main arteries developed stenoses more frequently near the ostium (ostium 55%, bifurcation 38%). Conversely, long anatomic left main arteries developed stenoses more frequently near the bifurcation (ostium 18%, bifurcation 77%, p = 0.001). Ostial left main stenoses were more common in women (44% vs 20%, p = 0.02), had larger lumen area (6.2 +/- 2.2 vs 4.6 +/- 2.3 mm(2), p = 0.002), less plaque burden (62 +/- 15% vs 80 +/- 9%, p <0.0001), less calcification (arc = 78 +/- 65 degrees vs 195 +/- 101 degrees, p <0.0001), and more negative remodeling (remodeling index = 0.87 +/- 0.19 vs 1.01 +/- 0.21, p = 0.005) than nonostial left main stenoses. Most ostial left main stenoses were categorized as eccentric (97% vs 76%, p = 0.01). Short and long left main arteries develop stenoses at different locations. Stenosis morphology was significantly different in these 2 locations.

Initial and long-term results of directional coronary atherectomy in unprotected left main coronary artery

Angioplasty in the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) has been controversial. Recently, several studies have suggested that new procedures and devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) and stents may change this situation. Although there are many reports of unprotected LMCA stenting, there are few reports of DCA of this lesion. Therefore, initial and long-term results were evaluated in 101 patients who underwent DCA for unprotected LMCA in our hospital. Emergency procedures were performed in 15 patients and electively in 86 patients. Scheduled angiographic follow-up was routinely performed, and all patients were clinically followed for >4 months after DCA. Technical success was achieved in 99%, and in-hospital outcomes were cardiac death (2%), noncardiac death (4%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (1%), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (8.9%), coronary artery bypass grafting (0%), and repeat angioplasty (4%). In-hospital results varied considerably, depending on presentation. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the emergency, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, and high-risk surgical subgroups. The angiographic restenosis rate was 20.4% at follow-up, and its predictor was postminimal lumen diameter by multivariate analysis. Mean clinical follow-up was 2.8 years; estimated 1- and 3-year survival rates were 87% and 80.7%, respectively. The cardiac survival rate of the low-risk surgical subgroup was significantly higher than that of the high-risk surgical subgroup (p <0.05). Thus, our data show that DCA can be performed safely and effectively in unprotected LMCA with an acceptable low restenosis rate and high survival rate.

Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: correlates of midterm survival and impact of patient selection

BACKGROUND

The study served to present the in-hospital and six-month clinical outcome and also the long-term survival data of a consecutive series of patients undergoing stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease.

METHODS

Revascularization with coronary bypass surgery has been generally recommended for treatment of left main coronary stenosis. Improvements in angioplasty and coronary stent techniques and equipment may result in the wider applicability of a percutaneous approach. A total of 92 consecutive patients underwent unprotected LMCA stenting between March 1994 and December 1998. For the initial 39 patients (group I) angioplasty was performed only when surgical revascularization was contraindicated. The remaining 53 patients (group II) also included patients in whom surgery was feasible. Patients were followed for 7.3 +/- 5.8 months (median 239 days; range 49 to 1,477 days).

RESULTS

Compared to group I, group II patients had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (60 +/- 12% vs. 51 +/- 16%, p < 0.01), less severe LMCA stenosis (68 +/- 12% vs. 80 +/- 10%, p < 0.001), lower surgical risk score (13 +/- 7 vs. 20 +/- 7, p < 0.001), and had angioplasty more often performed via the radial approach (88% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) with smaller guiding catheters (6F: 49% vs. 15%; 8F: 2% vs. 77%, p < 0.001). The procedural success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 4% (4 deaths, 3 cardiac). During follow-up there were six deaths, 13 patients required repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (4 LMCA), and two required coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Estimated survival (+/- SEE) was 89 +/- 6.3% at 500 days and 85 +/- 12% at 1,000 days post-stenting. Overall mortality was 3.8% in group II and 20.5% in group I (p < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary stenting can be performed safely in high-risk individuals with acceptable intermediate-term outcome. It may be feasible to broaden the application of this technique in selected patients needing revascularization for left main coronary disease.

Unusual complication of retrograde dissection to the coronary sinus of valsalva during percutaneous revascularization: a single-center experience and literature review

BACKGROUND

While coronary dissection, which is one of the most frequently occurring complications during interventional procedures, has various forms, extensive coronary dissection retrograde to the coronary sinus of Valsalva (CSV) is very rarely observed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Within the last 5 years, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with 4,700 consecutive patients who underwent angioplasty procedures, 7 of whom (0.15%) developed extensive coronary dissection retrograde to the CSV. Six of the seven patients developed retrograde dissection of the right CSV during angioplasty to the right coronary artery. One of the seven patents developed retrograde dissection of the left CSV during angioplasty to the left anterior descending artery. Retrograde dissection, which extended to the ascending aorta in two patients, was observed by transthoracic echocardiography and surgical findings, respectively. Five patients were successfully treated by coronary stenting. However, this complication caused four patients to have acute myocardial infarctions, resulting in emergency surgery for one patient and in-hospital death for another.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience increased our understanding of this very rare complication. However, this complication may be life threatening, and patients in this clinical setting may have a potential risk for acute myocardial infarction, emergency surgery, or even sudden cardiac death. Therefore, it is important to learn how to promptly diagnose and manage this complication.

Stent development and local drug delivery

Stent implantation has become the new standard angioplasty procedure. In-stent re-stenosis remains the major limitation of coronary stenting. Re-stenosis is related to patient-, lesion- and procedure-specific factors. Patient-specific factors can not be influenced to any extent. Procedure-specific factors are affected by implantation technique and stent characteristics. Design and material influence vascular injury and humoral and cellular response. Radiation has been shown to have inhibitory effects on smooth muscle cell growth and neo-intima formation, but in clinical trials the outcome has been hampered by re-stenosis at the edges of the radioactive stent ('candy wrapper'). New approaches target pharmacological modulation of local vascular biology by local administration of drugs. This allows for drug application at the precise site and time of vessel injury. Systemic release is minimal and this may reduce the risk of toxicity. The drug and the delivery vehicle must fulfil pharmacological, pharmacokinetic and mechanical requirements and the application of eluting degradable matrices seems to be a possible solution. Numerous pharmacological agents with antiproliferative properties are currently under clinical investigation, e.g. actinomycin D, rapamycin or paclitaxel. Another approach is for stents to be made of biodegradable materials as an alternative to metallic stents. Their potential long-term complications, such as in-stent re-stenosis and the inaccessibility of the lesion site for surgical revascularization, needs to be assessed. Current investigational devices and the line of (pre)clinical investigation are discussed in detail. Currently, there is little experimental, and only preliminary clinical, understanding of the acute and long-term effects of drug-eluting or biodegradable stents in coronary arteries. The clinical benefit of these approaches still has to be proven.

Does unprotected left main-stem stenting have a role in current interventional practice?

Left main-stem disease is found in up to 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Until recently, it has been regarded as an absolute indication for coronary bypass surgery, given the poor results of the early trials of balloon angioplasty for this condition. However, with rapidly advancing technology, including new generation stents and increasingly effective post-stenting anti-thrombotic regimens, there is now an increasing body of evidence to support the consideration of a percutaneous approach to left main-stem disease. Discerning patient selection, meticulous stent sizing and deployment, the routine use of intravascular ultrasound, aggressive anti-platelet regimes, and careful patient follow up are a few of the technical considerations required for a successful long-term outcome in this group.

Left main stenting-as a bridge to surgery-for acute type A aortic dissection and anterior myocardial infarction

Acute anterior wall myocardial infarction is a rare but often catastrophic presentation of ascending aortic dissection. We report the case of a patient who was successfully treated by direct stenting of the left main coronary artery, allowing for definitive surgical correction.

[The practical clinical guidelines of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología on interventional cardiology: coronary angioplasty and other technics]

Interventional cardiology has had an extraordinary expansion in last years. This clinical guideline is a review of the scientific evidence of the techniques in relation to clinical and anatomic findings. The review includes: 1. Coronary arteriography. 2. Coronary balloon angioplasty. 3. Coronary stents. 4. Other techniques: directional atherectomy, rotational atherectomy, transluminal extraction atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser angioplasty and transmyocardial laser and endovascular radiotherapy. 5. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 6. New diagnostic techniques: intravascular ultrasound, coronary angioscopy, Doppler and pressure wire. For the recommendations we have used the classification system: class I, IIa, IIb, III like in the guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association.

Surgical angioplasty of the main coronary arteries in children

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of surgical angioplasty of the coronary arteries in children.

METHODS

We performed 9 surgical reconstructions of the left main coronary artery and 1 of the right coronary artery ostium in 10 children (mean age 5.7 years; range 2 months-15 years). The basic diseases included the following: congenital atresia of the left coronary artery (n = 2) and atresia of the right coronary artery in a patient with an aortoventricular tunnel (n = 1); stenosis of the left main coronary artery (1) in a patient with Williams syndrome (n = 1), (2) in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 1), (3) after the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries (n = 3), (4) after reimplantation of an anomalous left main coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (n = 1), and (5) by compression after a réparation à l'étage ventriculaire procedure (n = 1). Myocardial viability was assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (thallium 201; 7/10). The coronary artery stem was enlarged with a saphenous (n = 5), a pericardial (n = 4), or a polytetrafluoroethylene patch (n = 1).

RESULTS

There was 1 hospital death and 9 patients are alive (mean follow-up 46 +/- 30 months; range 12 months to 10.5 years). Eight of 9 survivors had a selective coronary artery angiogram and had normal coronary artery ostia. Two patients had stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 1 of whom underwent successful internal thoracic artery grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical angioplasty of the coronary stems restores physiologic coronary perfusion and conserves bypass material. It can be performed safely in children and provides encouraging midterm results.

Immediate and long-term results of elective and emergent percutaneous interventions on protected and unprotected severely narrowed left main coronary arteries

Percutaneous revascularization of protected and unprotected left main coronary arteries is associated with acceptable immediate results, but there are significant long-term consequences, including the need for repeat percutaneous intervention (10%), myocardial infarction (7.5%), coronary artery bypass surgery (7%), and death (38%), despite the elective or emergent nature of the procedure.

Intravascular ultrasound predictors of target lesion revascularization after stenting of protected left main coronary artery stenoses

We evaluated the predictors of late clinical outcomes after stenting of protected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenoses. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided stenting of protected LMCA stenoses was performed in 87 consecutive patients between January 1994 and December 1996. Results were evaluated using conventional (clinical, angiographic, and IVUS) methodology. Late (12 month) clinical follow-up information was obtained in all patients. Initial procedural success was achieved in 86 patients (99%). There was 1 in-hospital death (in the 1 patient with a procedural failure). There were no other in-hospital complications, including Q-wave myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery, or repeat coronary angioplasty. The overall target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate was 13%. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictor of TLR was the postintervention lumen area by IVUS. A final lumen area > or =7.0 mm2 was obtained in 74 patients (86%); the TLR rate for these patients was 7%. This was compared with patients with a final lumen area <7.0 mm2 in whom the TLR rate was 50% (p = 0.0011). Stenting of protected LMCA stenoses is safe and effective with acceptable long-term clinical outcomes. The most important factor determining long-term success was the postintervention lumen area by IVUS.

Initial and long-term results of angioplasty in unprotected left main coronary artery

Angioplasty of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) has been controversial. Although recent single-center studies suggest that new devices may change the situation, many questions and problems remain. Therefore, the results of unprotected left main coronary angioplasty of 175 procedures in 107 patients were analyzed to evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness. The treatment of the initial 107 cases included balloon angioplasty (39 cases, 36%), directional coronary atherectomy (53 cases, 50%), and stents (15 cases, 14%). They were divided into 3 major subgroups: (1) acute group (n = 14), in which LMCA angioplasty was performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction; (2) emergency group (n = 10); and (3) elective group (n = 83). In-hospital mortality was higher in the acute (35.7%) and emergency (40.0%) groups than in the elective group (3.6%; p <0.0001). Angiographic follow-up was routinely performed and the restenosis rate including in-hospital restenosis was 70% in the acute group, 37.5% in the emergency group, and 40% in the elective group (p = NS). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2.9 years, and the estimated 5-year survival rates of the acute and emergency groups were 50% and 48.2%, respectively. However the 5-year survival rate of the elective group was higher than that seen in the acute or emergency group (77.5%; p <0.05). Repeat LMCA angioplasty was performed in 37 of 68 patients with 8.8% mortality (38.5% of acute and emergency cases and 1.8% of elective cases). The results indicated that elective unprotected LMCA angioplasty is relatively feasible and effective under scheduled angiographic follow-up.

Emergency left main stenting in the management of postcoronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) ischemia

Angioplasty has been used in the management of postcoronary bypass graft myocardial ischemia/infarction. A stent was successfully deployed in the left main artery in a patient with postcoronary bypass graft ischemia with hemodynamic instability. This case illustrates the potential use of emergency left main stenting in a selected patient with peri-operative ischemia, who was considered high risk for re-operation.