Coronary angioplasty for elderly patients with "high risk" unstable angina: short-term outcomes and long-term survival

Characteristics, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of nonagenarian compared with octogenarian acute myocardial infarction patients

We compared clinical characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of nonagenarian acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients (n=270, 92.3 ± 2.3 yr old) with octogenarian AMI patients (n=2,145, 83.5 ± 2.7 yr old) enrolled in Korean AMI Registry (KAMIR). Nonagenarians were less likely to have hypertension, diabetes and less likely to be prescribed with beta-blockers, statins, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors compared with octogenarians. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was preferred in octogenarians than nonagenarians, the success rate of PCI between the two groups was comparable. In-hospital mortality, the composite of in-hospital adverse outcomes and one year mortality were higher in nonagenarians than in octogenarians. However, the composite of the one year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) was comparable between the two groups without differences in MI or re-PCI rate. PCI improved 1-yr mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.69, P<0.001) and MACEs (adjusted HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.61, P<0.001) without significant complications both in nonagenarians and octogenarians. In conclusion, nonagenarians had similar 1-yr MACEs rates despite of higher in-hospital and 1-yr mortality compared with octogenarian AMI patients. PCI in nonagenarian AMI patients was associated to better 1-yr clinical outcomes.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly for myocardial infarction in the poststent era

BACKGROUND

Patients of > or =70 years of age and with acute coronary syndrome accumulate more risk factors with poor outcomes. Surgical revascularization is associated with increased mortality when compared with young population. The aim of this study was to communicate a single, small center experience, of percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly in poststent era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients, > or =70 years of age, with myocardial infarction (MI) at admission, between January, 2005 and November, 2006. We evaluate major and minor events during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Patients (64%) were male, 53.3% hypertension, 38.7% diabetes mellitus. Clinical presentation was: ST-segment elevation MI 53.3% and 5.3% with cardiogenic shock. Mean left ventricle ejection fraction was 48.5 +/- 18%. The procedure was successful in all the cases and culprit lesions received at least one stent in 93.4%. In-hospital major events were registered in 6.6% of cases: 3 (4%) death and 2 (2.6%) nonfatal MI; minor complications were registered in 5.2% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients >70 years of age during MI is feasible and safe, with low rates of complications.

The elder patient with suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

To describe the evaluation and outcomes of elder patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the Internet Tracking Registry for Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS) registry, which had 17,713 ED visits for suspected ACS. First visits from the United States with nonmissing patient demographics, 12-lead electrocardiogram results, and clinical history were included in the analysis. Those who used cocaine or amphetamines or left the ED against medical advice were excluded. Elder was defined as age 75 years or older. ACS was defined by 30-day revascularization, Diagnosis-related Group codes, or death within 30 days with positive cardiac biomarkers at index hospitalization. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between being elder and 1) 30-day all-cause mortality, 2) ACS, 3) diagnostic tests ordered, and 4) disposition. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed to determine which clinical variables were associated with ACS in elder and nonelder patients.

RESULTS

A total of 10,126 patients with suspected ACS presenting to the ED were analyzed. For patients presenting to the ED, being elder was independently associated with ACS and all-cause 30-day mortality, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5 to 2.2) and 2.6 (95% CI = 1.6 to 4.3), respectively. Elder patients were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI = 1.8 to 2.6), but there were no differences in the rates of cardiac catheterization and noninvasive stress cardiac imaging. Different clinical variables were associated with ACS in elder and nonelder patients. Chest pain as chief complaint, typical chest pain, and previous history of coronary artery disease were significantly associated with ACS in nonelder patients but were not associated with ACS in elder patients. Male gender and left arm pain were associated with ACS in both elder and nonelder patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elder patients who present to the ED with suspected ACS represent a population at high risk for ACS and 30-day mortality. Elders are more likely to be admitted to the hospital, but despite an increased risk for adverse events, they have similar odds of receiving a diagnostic test, such as stress cardiac imaging or cardiac catheterization, compared with nonelder patients. Different clinical variables are associated with ACS, and clinical prediction rules utilizing presenting symptoms should consider the effect modification of age.

Benefits on coronary restenosis from elective paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in patients aged 75 years and older

OBJECTIVE

Elderly patients are increasingly referred for revascularisation yet have been underrepresented in some large clinical trials. Although the advent of drug-eluting stents has dramatically reduced clinical events related to restenosis, older age remains one of the most important correlates of adverse outcome, even after an elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to evaluate the impact of paclitaxel-eluting stents on coronary restenosis in elderly patients undergoing elective PCI.

METHODS

Patients undergoing successful elective PCI with stenting of de novo coronary artery lesions were identified and screened for participation in this study. All patients included in our analysis were divided into two cohort groups: patients aged <75 years (younger cohort) and patients aged >or=75 years (elderly cohort). We evaluated the six-month incidence of target lesion revascularisation (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events, which included TLR, death and myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A total of 171 (58 aged >or=75 years) consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. At six months, TLR rate was similar in both groups [1.77 vs. 1.72%, odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-10.9, P = 0.98, in the younger and elderly group, respectively]. Even the rate of major adverse cardiac events was comparable between the two groups (7.96 vs. 8.62%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.34-3.41, P = 0.88, in the younger and elderly group, respectively). Also the angiographic restenosis rates were comparable between patients <75 or >or=75 years (4.42 vs. 3.46%, P = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

After elective paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation, there is no difference in coronary restenosis in younger and elderly patients, suggesting an age-independent efficacy.

Coronary angiography in the elderly with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Despite the high mortality rate in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the value of coronary angiography (CA) in the elderly has been questioned due to a less favorable outcome. The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of CA on mortality of elderly patients AMI in "real world" practice.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 1009 elderly (age > or = 75 years) patients with AMI who were derived from three prospective national surveys between 1996 and 2000 in all 25 CCUs operating in Israel. Baseline characteristics, hospital course, management and outcome of 274 (27%) elderly patients who underwent CA during the index hospitalization were compared with 735 (73%) counterpart patients who did not.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent CA were on average 2.2 years younger, and were more often with hyperlipidemia (p<0.0001 for each) and with a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention (p<0.03) than the control group. They had a more favorable clinical presentation: a higher systolic blood pressure (p<0.04), a better Killip class (p<0.03) and an increased frequency of non-Q wave MI (p<0.03). They developed more often recurrent MI (p=0.002) and re-ischemia (p<0.0001). Variables associated with CA use during the index hospitalization were re-infarction, re-ischemia, the year of the index AMI and the availability of an on-site a catheterization laboratory in the hospital, while a higher age and fibrinolytic therapy decreased the likelihood of CA use. Of the patients who underwent CA, 67% underwent coronary revascularization (either PCI and/or CABG). Crude and adjusted mortality rates at 1 year were significantly lower in patients who underwent CA, as compared to counterparts who did not: 21% vs. 37.3%, respectively (p<0.0001), hazard ratio=0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.71). The benefit of CA was noted in a wide range of subgroups analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

In "real world" practice, elderly patients with AMI who undergo CA during hospitalization have a better prognosis at 1 year. Age alone should not be a deterrent to performing CA in elderly patients with AMI. Further large randomized trials are needed to confirm that an invasive approach is beneficial in high-risk elderly patients with AMI.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

To determine the prognostic significance of coronary angiography (CA) during the course of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in "real world" practice on mortality of elderly patients, 1009 such patients were studied. Re-infarction, re-ischemia, the year of the index AMI and the availability of an on-site a Cath. Lab. were variables which increased the likelihood of undergoing CA, while a higher age and fibrinolytic therapy decreased this likelihood. The crude and covariate adjusted mortality rates at 1 year were significantly lower in patients who underwent CA in comparison to counterparts who did not: 21% vs. 37.3%, respectively (p<0.0001), hazard ratio 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.71). The benefit of CA was noted across a wide range of subgroups analyzed.

[Therapeutic attitude after coronariography in elderly patients with ischemic heart disease]

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of ischemic heart disease in the elderly is high. These patients are increasing referred for coronariography.

OBJECTIVES

Identify factors associated with coronary revascularization in elderly patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 473 patients > or = 75 years who underwent coronariography in relationship with ischemic heart disease. Their clinical-epidemiological characteristics and treatment adopted were analyzed. A multivariate analysis model was used to identify factors associated with revascularization.

RESULTS

Mean age was 77.6 +/- 2.8 years; 70.4% were men. A total of 36% smoked, 53% were hypertensive, 33% diabetics and 30% dislipidemic. Thirty one % had multivessel disease and 11% involvement of left coronary trunk. There was evidence of anterior descending artery in 68%. Medical treatment was done in 48.4%, percutaneous revascularization in 41.5% and surgical in 10.1%. Patients with lesions of the anterior descending artery were revascularized in greater proportion: 67.7% vs 32.3%; p. 0.001. A logistic regression model was used to identify revascularization predictors, obtaining a direct relationship with the involvement of the anterior descending artery (OR: 4.87; 95% CI: 2.98-7.94; (p < 0.001) and inverse on with the previous revascularization (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26-0.85; p < 0.02), left ventricular dysfunction (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88; p = 0.01) and presence of multivessel disease (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.84; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly subjects with ischemic heart disease who underwent coronariography received revascularizing treatment in somewhat more than 50% of the cases. A direct relationship was found between involvement of the anterior descending artery and performance of revascularizing treatment and an inverse on between previous revascularization, left ventricular dysfunction and presence of multivessel disease.

Early invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: comparison with younger patients regarding 30 day and long term outcome

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate an early invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

All consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of non-ST elevation ACS from June 2002 to February 2004 were enrolled in this registry. Clinical outcome was assessed at 30 days and in long term follow up.

RESULTS

An early invasive strategy was followed for 439 patients, of whom 159 (36%) were elderly and had a higher clinical risk profile and greater extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) than the younger patients. Coronary revascularisation was conducted in 133 (83%) elderly patients and 239 (85%) younger patients (not significant). At a mean (SD) follow up time of 10.7 (5.2) months overall mortality, cardiac death, and death plus myocardial infarction were significantly higher among elderly patients than among younger patients (9.4% v 2.1%, p < 0.001; 6.8% v 1.8%, p < 0.01; 11.3% v 5%, p = 0.02, respectively). The significant difference in cardiac death between the two groups was related more to elderly patients being treated by coronary artery bypass grafting (19.3% v 4.9%, p = 0.05) than by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (2.9% v 1.1%, p = 0.3). Cox regression analysis showed age, serum creatinine > 115 micromol/l, no previous history of CAD, left ventricular ejection fraction > 45%, and the absence of diabetes to be independent predictors of the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

In unselected elderly patients presenting with non-ST elevation ACS an early invasive strategy is feasible and leads to coronary revascularisation in the majority of cases, resulting in encouraging immediate and long term clinical results, particularly among PCI treated patients.

Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: treatment strategies and 30-day outcome

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the current care of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with particular regard to the rate of use of antiplatelet drugs and the type of strategy, aggressive or conservative, in a population of consecutive patients admitted to 76 Coronary Care Units in Italy.

METHODS

Prospective registry of patients admitted to Coronary Care Units with a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation ACS during a 2-month period. Thirty-day follow-up was available in all patients.

RESULTS

Of 1581 patients enrolled in the registry, 564 were 75 years or older. As compared with the 1017 younger patients, elderly patients had a greater prevalence of female sex (42% vs 27%, P <.001), hypertension (70% vs 59%, P <.001), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (41% vs 29%, P <.001), prior angina (18% vs 13%, P <.01), prior use of aspirin (49% vs 39%, P <.001), ST-segment depression (54% vs 43%, P <.001), and troponin positivity (66% vs 59%, P <.05). The higher-risk profile of elderly patients was confirmed by the greater number of patients with a high TIMI risk score (37% vs 22%, P <.001). GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors were less frequently used in elderly patients (P <.05). An aggressive strategy (coronary arteriography within 4 days of admission, followed by revascularization, if feasible) was adopted in 39% elderly patients and in 56% younger patients (P <.001). An interventional procedure within 30 days was performed in 30% of elderly patients and 48% of younger patients (P <.001). Elderly patients had a more unfavorable 30-day outcome compared with younger ones, as shown by the higher rates of death (6.4% vs 1.7%), acute myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 5%), and stroke (1.3% vs 0.5%). Multivariate analysis of the elderly group identified a conservative strategy (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.20 to 4.48) and a diagnosis of non-Q-wave MI (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.32 to 3.93) as independent predictors of 30-day events.

CONCLUSIONS

The elderly represent a very high-risk subgroup among patients with non-ST-elevation ACS, with a nearly 4-fold as high 30-day death rate as that of younger patients. These data call for a greater attention to such population, both in terms of an improved representation in clinical research and of the assessment of the outcome of different strategies in appropriately designed randomized trials.

Contemporary outcome of cardiac catheterizations in 1085 consecutive octogenarians

BACKGROUND

A growing number of patients > or = 80 years require cardiac catheterization. Since little is known about the overall safety of these procedures in this population, we assessed the procedure-related risks and determined predictors for complications.

METHODS

We studied 1085 consecutive patients > or = 80 years (82.6+/-2.6 years; 526 males, 544 females), who underwent 1384 cardiac catheterizations in a tertiary specialist university hospital (3% of 43,517 procedures).

RESULTS

A total of 373 patients (35%) required percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and 331 (31%) received coronary artery bypass surgery. Thirty-one patients died during hospital stay. Procedure-related complications including vascular injuries occurred in 2.1% after CATH and 11.6% after PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the widespread notion that cardiac catheterization exposes patients > or = 80 years to an unwarranted risk, these data demonstrate an acceptable complication rate. Patients #10878;80 years of age should thus not be refused to undergo cardiac catheterization merely based on their age.

In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions in the very elderly

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death among the elderly (> 65 years) and the very elderly (> 85 years). Little information is available regarding the outcome of very elderly patients referred for PCI in the current era of improved techniques, devices, and pharmacotherapy. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of very elderly patients > or = 85 years of age in a large, contemporary, multi-institutional PCI database. Five hospitals in the New York City metropolitan area contributed these prospectively defined data elements on consecutive patients undergoing PCI from 1 January 1998 to 1 October 1999. Of 10,847 patients, 5,341 (49%) were younger than 65 years, 3,342 (31%) were 65-74 years, 1,885 (17%) were 75-84 years, and 279 (2.6%) were at least 85 years of age. Following PCI, the very elderly developed stroke (P < 0.001) and renal failure requiring dialysis (P = 0.002) more commonly than younger patients following PCI. The very elderly had a significantly increased in-hospital mortality rate at 2.5% (P < 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, age > or = 85 years was not an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.37-4.07). The very elderly should not be refused PCI on the basis of advanced age alone.

Long-term clinical outcome of coronary artery stenting in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The elderly constitute a rapidly expanding segment of our population and cardiovascular disease becomes more prevalent with increasing age. Existing data have shown that percutaneous coronary interventions in the elderly are associated with an increase risk of in-hospital complications compared to younger patients. In the present study we retrospectively assessed the long-term clinical outcome of coronary artery stenting in an elderly population and compared them with the cohort of younger patients.

METHODS

The study population included 402 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery stenting; of these 69 were elderly (age > 70 years, group I) and 333 were younger (age <or= 70 years, group II). Percutaneous coronary intervention combined with stent implantation was performed using standard techniques. Clinical outcomes during follow-up (24 +/- 13 months, range 7-56 months) were obtained in all patients without major in-hospital complications. Survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models for any late clinical event were reported.

RESULTS

No difference in in-hospital complications or clinical success rate was observed between the two groups of patients. Complete revascularization was obtained more frequently in younger compared to elderly patients (P < 0.05). At 2 years, event-free survival was 62% in the elderly and 76% in younger patients (P < 0.001); this difference was mostly made-up by recurrence of angina in the elderly. Impaired left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction < 40%) was an independent predictor of late death.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery stenting is an effective therapeutic strategy in elderly with coronary artery disease and is associated with good short- and long-term results. Age per se should not preclude patients from undergoing coronary stenting.

Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with ischemic heart disease are increasingly referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, reports of poor outcomes in the elderly have led to questions about the benefit of these strategies. We studied survival by prescribed treatment (CABG, PCI, or medical therapy) for patients in 3 age categories: <70 years, 70 to 79 years, and > or =80 years of age.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) is a clinical data collection and outcome monitoring initiative capturing all patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and revascularization in the province of Alberta, Canada, since 1995. Characteristics and long-term outcomes of a cohort of >6000 elderly patients with ischemic heart disease were compared with younger patients. In 15 392 patients >70 years of age, 4-year adjusted actuarial survival rates for CABG, PCI, and medical therapy were 95.0%, 93.8%, and 90.5%, respectively. In 5198 patients 70 to 79 years of age, survival rates were 87.3%, 83.9%, and 79.1%, respectively. In 983 patients > or = 80 years of age, survival was 77.4% for CABG, 71.6% for PCI, and 60.3% for medical therapy. Absolute risk differences in comparison to medical therapy for CABG (17.0%) and PCI (11.3%) were greater for patients > or =80 years of age than for younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients paradoxically have greater absolute risk reductions associated with surgical or percutaneous revascularization than do younger patients. The combination of these results with a recent randomized trial suggests that the benefits of aggressive revascularization therapies may extend to subsets of patients in older age groups.

[Unstable angina in the elderly]

Unstable angina and acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation are frequent and their prognosis is poor in the elderly. Indeed, age is the most powerful predictor of in-hospital mortality in this setting. The clinical benefit of interventional strategies, as demonstrated by FRISC II and TACTICS TIMI 18 studies, seems to be most important in this age subset. PURSUIT trial demonstrates that the efficacy of eptifibatide, a IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitor, increases in elderly patients who simultaneously undergo revascularization interventions. Individual application of such treatment strategies may be difficult. Potential triggering factors of unstable angina and comorbidities have to be taken into account, and the overall management should be highly individualized in elderly patients. The aim remains to achieve appropriate myocardial revascularization, as often as possible by focusing coronary angioplasty on the culprit vessel. Coronary surgery generally should be reserved for coronary lesions which are not suitable for percutaneous revascularization. Clinical improvement is maximal in patients with severe initial presentation.

[Unstable angina in the elderly: clinical, profile, management and mortality at three months. The PEPA Registry Data]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Few reports in the literature have studied the characteristics and management of unstable angina in the elderly in Spain. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and the use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources in patients > or = 70 years of age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,551 patients > or = 70 years of age were included out of 4,115 included in the PEPA registry with a follow up of 90 days. These patients were compared with 2,564 < 70 years.

RESULTS

In comparison, the elderly (76 +/- 5 years) versus the younger group (58 +/- 8.5 years) included a higher proportion of women (43 vs 27%), diabetics (30 vs 23%)and hypertensive patients (60 vs 49%) with a lower proportion (p < 0.001) of hypercholesterolemia (33 vs 43%), smoking (40 vs 60%) or family history (9 vs 17%). A previous history of angina (49 vs 35%) or infarction (38 vs31%) and comorbidity was found to be significantly more frequent in the elderly, with a worse previous functional class (NYHA > 2 out of 34 vs 15%). The elderly were treated with fewer invasive procedures (25 vs 44%) or catheterization (26 vs 36%) and they were more frequently controlled with medical treatment (86 vs 83%) although with a lower use of beta blockers (45 vs 53%). The mortality at 3 months was greater in the elderly (7.4 vs 3.0%;p < 0.005) with age being an independent predictor of bad prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed the age, ST segment depression, diabetes and heart failure on admission to be predictors of bad prognosis in the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

A different pattern is observed in cardiovascular risk factors with a more unfavorable clinical profile in elderly patients with unstable angina. The management of these patients is less aggressive and the mortality is greater. Diabetes, heart failure and ST segment depression on admission are independent predictors of bad prognosis in elderly patients.

Influence of patient age on acute and late clinical outcomes following Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation

Procedural success may be lower and complication rates higher after balloon angioplasty in older patients. Elective stent implantation improves procedural outcome in younger patients; however, few series have specifically analyzed the octogenarian population. Therefore, we studied 2,534 consecutive patients (3,965 native coronary artery stenoses) who were treated electively with Palmaz-Schatz stents and divided them into 3 groups: (1) < or = 70 years old (n = 1,805), (2) 71 to 80 years old (elderly, n = 607), and (3) > 80 years old (octogenarian, n = 122). Major in-hospital complications (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent bypass surgery) were significantly higher in the octogenarians than in the elderly and patients < or = 70 years of age (4.5% vs 2.0% and 1.5%; p = 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and need for any revascularization) did not differ among groups; however, there was a stepwise increase in late death in octogenarians (5%) compared with elderly patients (2%) and patients aged < or = 70 years (1%) (p = 0.001). Target lesion revascularization was similar among the groups (11% in octogenarian vs 14% in elderly and 15% in patients < or = 70 years, p = 0.791). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, age was an independent predictor of late mortality (odds ratio 1.05, p = 0.0001), but not a predictor of target lesion revascularization. Stent implantation in octogenarians is associated with (1) more acute complications, (2) a higher in-hospital mortality, (3) a higher late mortality, and (4) a target lesion revascularization similar to younger patients.

[The therapeutic focus in severe hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with multivessel coronary disease]

The association of severe hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease increases surgical morbimortality, even more in patients over 65 years. We describe a combined therapeutic approach to these diseases. A 68-year-old woman with a diagnosis of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy was in functional class IV for angina and dyspnea despite 360 mg of propranolol a day. An echocardiogram and a complete cardiac catheterization were performed under betablocker therapy, confirming a severe hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and revealing severe stenosis in the proximal left circumflex and the proximal right coronary arteries, and a moderate lesion in the mid-left anterior descendent. They were both treated with balloon PTCA, and a 3 x 15 mm stent was placed in the circumflex and a 3.5 x 20 mm stent in the right coronary, with an excellent angiographic result. A basal hemodynamic study was then performed and A-V sequential pacing was attempted, achieving a significant decrease in the left ventricle outflow tract gradient. A DDD-R pacemaker was implanted. Echocardiographic study was performed post-implantation, and follow-up was made six months later with a new coronary angiography, hemodynamic study and a Doppler echocardiogram. At the present time A-V sequential pacing as a therapeutic option for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and coronary angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of coronary artery disease are sufficiently established and supported to be offered as a combined therapy to patients suffering from both diseases, specially those with a higher surgical risk.

[Arterial myocardial revascularization in the 9th decade of life. Personal results and review of the literature]

The rate of the population being 80 years of age and even older, has an increasing tendency in the Federal Republic of Germany. In 1996, a total of 87,372 patients received surgery supported by the heart-lung-machine, 2,383 patients out of these (2.7%) were 80 years of age and older. In view of the limited life expectance, the arterial revascularization in this age category is faced with controverse discussions. We analysed our patients in relation to this aspect. Between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 1997, 4,338 patients underwent surgery supported by the heart-lung-machine. Hundred and fifty-five out of these (3.6%) were in the 9th decade of life. Seventy-seven patients out of the 155 (49.7%, 34 women, 43 men, 80 to 88 years old, mean: 82 years of age) underwent an isolated myocardial revascularization. We performed 55 (71%) elective, 16 (21%) urgent and 6 (8%) emergency surgeries. Twelve patients (15.6%) solely received venous bypasses (Group I), 65 (84.4%) additionally also received unilateral bypasses of the internal mammaria artery (IMA) (Group II). Three patients died at our facility (3.9%), 3 further patients died during the follow-up treatment in outlying hospitals, the in-patient mortality rate in Group I therefore presented a rate of 8.3%, in Group II 7.7% and in total, a rate of 7.8%. In 1996, the in-patient mortality rate could be reduced to 3.6%. The follow-up observation time ranged between 7 and 138 weeks (median 44 weeks). The survival rate for patients with an IMA-bypass after 1 year was 86.3%, after 2 years 77%, and for the entire collective 85.3% and 75%. Whereas 96% of the patients could pre-operatively be related to Class III or IV of the NYHA-classification, 55 of the 63 survivors (87%) belonged to Class I (6%) or II (81%). Two Group I patients (22.2%), 3 Group II patients (5.6%) and 7.9% of the total collective complained about repeated angina symptoms. The myocardial revascularization with the internal mammaria artery performed on patients in the 9th decade of life, achieves an acceptable morbidity and mortality compared to solely venous coronary bypasses. The more prolonged follow-up observation period will clarify, whether the arterial myocardial revascularization also proves to be the superior method in this age category.

Long-term (10-year) outcome in patients with unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine completed 10-year survival and event-free survival in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Patients with unstable angina are at increased risk for recurrent acute coronary events.

METHODS

The study included 208 consecutive patients (133 with stable and 75 with unstable angina pectoris) undergoing angioplasty from 1984 to 1986. The balloon crossed the lesion in 185 patients (121 with stable and 64 with unstable angina pectoris). Angioplasty was performed in patients with unstable angina pectoris 12+/-15 days (median 8) after symptom onset. Patients with unstable angina pectoris were classified retrospectively into Braunwald class I (n=3), class II (n=20), class III (n=28), class B (n=52) and class C (n=12). Follow-up data were obtained from hospital charts, telephone interview and official death certificates where applicable. The study had >80% power to detect a clinically significant 20% difference in survival and a 20% difference in event-free survival between the stable and unstable patient groups.

RESULTS

Despite similar baseline characteristics, early (40-day) mortality was slightly higher in patients with unstable angina (4.7% [3 of 64 patients] vs. 0.8% [1 of 121 patients], p=NS). Long-term outcome was not different, because survival curves were parallel thereafter (10-year survival was 83% for those with stable and 77% for those with unstable angina, p=NS). Survival free of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 10 years was 53% in patients with stable and 47% in patients with unstable angina (p=NS), and survival free of infarction, bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty was 32% for both groups at 10 years. In patients with Braunwald class III unstable angina, 10-year survival was 80%, as compared with 85% in other patients with unstable angina, due to the early hazard (p=NS). Survival and event-free survival were similar in patients who had had a recent myocardial infarction (Braunwald class C) and in patients with acute electrocardiographic changes. Repeat hospital admissions were not more frequent in patients with unstable angina (3.1+/-3.5 vs. 3.0+/-2.6, p=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Ten-year survival and event-free survival were similar in patients with stable and unstable angina pectoris treated by coronary balloon angioplasty, with no evidence of an increased rate of recurrent cardiovascular events in the unstable group.

Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery stenting with those of younger patients and to determine the long-term clinical outcome and survival of elderly patients post stent implantation.

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients undergoing coronary revascularization are considered a high-risk group. Few data exist that relate the results of stenting in treating coronary artery disease in the elderly population.

METHODS

All elderly patients >75 years of age who underwent coronary artery stenting between March 1993 and July 1997 (n=137) at our center were compared to the patients <75 who underwent coronary artery stenting during the same time period (n=2,551). Long-term clinical follow-up and survival were determined for the elderly group.

RESULTS

Elderly patients presented with lower ejection fractions (54% vs. 58%, p=0.0001), more unstable angina (47% vs. 28%, p=0.0001), and more multivessel disease (78% vs. 62%, p= 0.0001) than younger patients. These older patients had higher rates of procedure related complications including procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.2), emergency CABG (3.7% vs. 1.4%, p=0.04), and death (2.2% vs. 0.12%, p=0.0001). Angiographic follow-up, obtained in both groups, demonstrated significantly higher restenosis rates in the elderly versus younger patients (47% vs. 28%, p=0.0007). Longer term clinical follow-up, which was obtained only in the elderly group, showed that at a mean follow-up period of 12 months post coronary stenting, elderly survival free from death, MI, revascularization and angina was 54% and that their overall survival was 91%. Subanalysis of the elderly patients who died showed much higher incidence of combined unstable angina (80%), prior MI (60%), lower ejection fraction (46%), multivessel disease (100%) and complex lesions (100%) than the overall group.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients who undergo coronary artery stenting have significantly higher rates of procedural complications and worse six month outcomes than younger patients, especially those who present with combined unstable angina, history of MI, EF < 50%, multivessel disease and complex lesions. Overall survival in the elderly population at 12 months postcoronary artery stenting was 91% and event-free survival was 54%.