Can a class III antiarrhythmic drug improve electrical defibrillation efficacy during ventricular fibrillation?

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of nifekalant in healthy Chinese volunteers

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug, and its major adverse effect is prolongation of the QT interval. This study analysed data generated from a pharmacokinetic (PK) study to develop a population PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) model for describing the relationship between plasma concentrations and prolongation of the QT interval over time following intravenous administration of nifekalant. This open-labelled, phase I clinical study comprised two dose level groups of eight healthy Chinese volunteers. Concentrations of nifekalant in plasma samples collected at set time-points were determined using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. A PK/PD model was constructed using a non-linear mixed-effects approach (Phoenix NLME 8.1). Furthermore, demographic covariates of the model were investigated and a concentration factor (Conc^Ɵ) was introduced as the only covariate which improved the performance of the model. The final population PK model exhibited one-order elimination with two-compartment distribution and adequately described nifekalant plasma concentrations over time. The QT interval prolongation was best described by an indirect effect model with an inhibition build-up effect, representing the relationship between plasma concentrations and effect. The final population PK/PD model may facilitate more accurate predictions of the drug profile in clinical settings in the future.

Efficacy of Nifekalant in Patients With Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome and Atrial Fibrillation: Electrophysiological and Clinical Findings

Background

The efficacy of nifekalant in preexcited atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been assessed.

Methods and Results

The study populations consisted of patients with sustained preexcited AF (n=51), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (n=201), and persistent AF (n=87). Effects of intravenous infusion of nifekalant were assessed on electrophysiological and clinical parameters. Nifekalant prolonged the shortest preexcited R‐R, the average preexcited R‐R, and the average R‐R intervals from 290±35 to 333±44 ms, 353±49 to 443±64 ms, and 356±53 to 467±75 ms, respectively, in patients with preexcited AF (all P<0.001). Nifekalant also decreased the percentage of preexcited QRS complexes, heart rate, and increased systolic pressure (all P<0.001). Nifekalant terminated AF in 33 of 51 patients (65%). Similar effects were also observed in a subgroup of 12 patients with preexcited AF and impaired left ventricular function. In patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, nifekalant significantly prolonged the effective refractory period, the block cycle length of the antegrade accessory pathway, and the atrial effective refractory period (all P<0.001). Nifekalant had no effect on the effective refractory period of the antegrade atrioventricular node. Finally, in patients with persistent AF without an accessory pathway, nifekalant did not significantly decrease the ventricular rate of AF. One patient developed Torsades de Pointes. No other adverse effects were observed.

Conclusions

Nifekalant prolongs the effective refractory period of the antegrade accessory pathway and atrium without blocking antegrade conduction through the atrioventricular node, leading to slowing and/or to termination of preexcited AF. Thus, nifekalant might be an effective and a relatively safe drug in patients with preexcited AF.

Does Antiarrhythmic Drug During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improve the One-month Survival: The SOS-KANTO 2012 Study

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) are often used for fatal ventricular arrhythmias during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, the efficacy of initial AAD administration during CPR in improving long-term prognosis remains unknown. This study retrospectively evaluated the effect of AAD administration during CPR on 1-month prognosis in the SOS-KANTO 2012 study population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of the 16,164 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases, 1350 shock-refractory patients were included: 747 patients not administered AAD and 603 patients administered AAD. Statistical adjustment for potential selection bias was performed using propensity score matching, yielding 1162 patients of whom 792 patients were matched (396 pairs). The primary outcome was 1-month survival. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with favorable neurological outcome at 1 month. Logistic regression with propensity scoring demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) for 1-month survival in the AAD group of 1.92 (P < 0.01), whereas the OR for favorable neurological outcome at 1 month was 1.44 (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly greater 1-month survival was observed in the AAD group compared with the non-AAD group. However, the effect of ADD on the likelihood of a favorable neurological outcome remains unclear. The findings of the present study may indicate a requirement for future randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of ADD administration during CPR on long-term prognosis.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with refractory ventricular fibrillation

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.

Nifekalant Versus Amiodarone in the Treatment of Cardiac Arrest: an Experimental Study in a Swine Model of Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation

PURPOSE

The purpose of the experiment was to compare the effects of nifekalant and amiodarone on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, as well as on the hemodynamic parameters in a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF).

METHODS

After 8 min of untreated VF, bolus doses of epinephrine (adrenaline) and either nifekalant, or amiodarone, or saline (n = 10 per group), were administered after randomization. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was commenced immediately after drug administration and defibrillation was attempted 2 min later. CPR was resumed for another 2 min after each defibrillation attempt and the same dose of adrenaline was given every 4th minute during CPR.

RESULTS

Forty-eight hour survival was significantly higher with nifekalant compared to amiodarone (p < 0.001) and saline (p = 0.02), (9/10 vs. 0/10 vs. 3/10, respectively). Systolic aortic pressure, diastolic aortic pressure and coronary perfusion pressure were significantly higher with nifekalant during CPR and immediate post-resuscitation period (p < 0.05). The animals in the amiodarone group had a slower heart rate at the 1st and 45th min post-ROSC (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). The number of electric shocks required for terminating VF, time to ROSC and adrenaline dose were significantly higher with amiodarone compared to nifekalant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nifekalant showed a more favorable hemodynamic profile and improved survival compared to amiodarone and saline in this swine model.

Amiodarone or nifekalant upon hospital arrival for refractory ventricular fibrillation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the association between nifekalant or amiodarone on hospital admission and in-hospital mortality for cardiac arrest patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database. We identified 2961 patients who suffered cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and who had ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival between July 2007 and March 2013. Patients were categorized into amiodarone (n=2353) and nifekalant (n=608) groups, from which 525 propensity score-matched pairs were generated.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference in the admission rate between the nifekalant and amiodarone groups in propensity score-matched groups (75.6% vs. 69.3%, respectively; difference, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-11.7). An analysis using the hospital nifekalant/amiodarone rate as an instrumental variable found that receiving nifekalant was associated with an improved admission rate (22.2%, 95% CI, 11.9-32.4). We found no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the nifekalant and amiodarone groups (81.5% vs. 82.1%, respectively; difference, -0.6%; 95% CI, -5.2 to 4.1). Instrumental variable analysis showed that receiving nifekalant was not associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (6.2%, 95% CI, -2.4 to 14.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study suggested no significant in-hospital mortality association between nifekalant and amiodarone for cardiogenic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with ventricular fibrillation/persistent ventricular tachycardia on hospital arrival. Although nifekalant may potentially improve hospital admission rates compared with amiodarone for these patients, further studies are required to confirm our results.

[Drug Therapy for Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation: Comparison of Nifekalant and Amiodarone]

Early direct current (DC) shock is the most important therapy for ventricular fibrillation. Following the increased availability of automated external defibrillators (AED), the survival rate of cardiopulmonary arrest patients with ventricular fibrillation has improved. Although patients with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation require additional antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the optimal protocol has not been established. Nifekalant is a pure potassium channel blocker with a pyrimidinedione structure. Nifekalant was approved in Japan for the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 1999, and is widely used as a class III antiarrhythmic intravenous drug. Intravenous amiodarone was approved in Japan in 2007, and exhibits various effects on ion channels, receptors, sympathetic activity, and thyroid function. Nifekalant and amiodarone also exhibit many pharmacological and pharmacodynamic differences. As nifekalant has no negative inotropic effect and a rapid action and clearance with a short half-life, it has some advantages over amiodarone for use in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Indeed, data from clinical and animal studies suggest that nifekalant is superior to amiodarone for resuscitation of cardiopulmonary arrest resulting from shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. A 300-mg bolus intravenous injection of amiodarone is considered an overdose for resuscitation of shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation. Further clinical studies are required to evaluate the effects of nifekalant compared with amiodarone, and to determine the optimal dose of amiodaone, for resuscitation of shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation.

Frequency characteristics and associations with the defibrillation threshold of ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

OBJECTIVE

The dominant frequency (DF) in frequency analyses is considered to represent the objective cycle length and complexity of activation under conditions of ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, knowledge regarding the mechanisms determining the DF in human VF is limited. We studied the characteristics of the DF of human VF and relationship between DF and the defibrillation threshold.

METHODS

Seventy-two implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients and 211 VF were studied. Using defibrillation tests, we performed a frequency analysis with fast Fourier transformation. The correlations between DF and clinical characteristics, including the defibrillation threshold, were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean DF of all induced VFs was 5.2±0.8 Hz. The patients were divided into two groups according to DF: the low-DF (DF <5.2 Hz, n=32) and high-DF (DF ≥5.2 Hz, n=40) groups. The frequency of structural heart disease was significantly higher in the low-DF group. In addition, the QRS duration, QT interval and effective refractory period of the right ventricle (RV-ERP) were significantly longer in the low-DF group. A multivariate analysis showed RV-ERP to be the only independent predictor of DF. Excluding patients receiving group III anti-arrhythmic drugs, which are known to have potent defibrillation threshold effects, the defibrillation threshold was significantly lower in the low-DF group (p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

We found that the DF of human VF is associated with underlying heart disease, the cardiac function, cardiac conduction, ventricular refractoriness and defibrillation threshold. Our findings may be useful for identifying and managing patients with a high defibrillation threshold.

Comparison of nifekalant and amiodarone for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest resulting from shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation

Purpose

Nifekalant is a pure potassium channel blocker that has been used to treat ventricular tachyarrhythmias since 1999 in Japan. Intravenous amiodarone was approved later than nifekalant in Japan, and it is still unclear which of the two agents is superior. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of nifekalant and amiodarone for resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest caused by shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation.

Methods

From December 2005 to January 2011, ambulance services transported 283 out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest patients to our hospital. Of these, 25 patients were treated with nifekalant or amiodarone in response to ventricular fibrillation that was resistant to two or more shocks. We undertook a retrospective analysis of these 25 patients.

Results

We enrolled 20 men and 5 women with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 61.1 ± 16.4 years. All 25 patients were treated with tracheal intubation and intravenous epinephrine. Fourteen patients received nifekalant and 11 patients received amiodarone. The rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (nifekalant, 5/14, versus amiodarone, 4/11; P = 0.97) and survival to discharge (nifekalant, 4/14, versus amiodarone, 2/11; P = 0.89) were not significantly different between the two groups. The time from nifekalant or amiodarone administration to ROSC was 6.0 ± 6.6 and 20.3 ± 10.0 min, respectively, which was significantly different (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In this small sample size study, nifekalant, compared with amiodarone, is equally effective for ROSC and survival to discharge after shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation and can achieve ROSC more quickly. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Nifekalant in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The aim of the present study is to review the literature and discuss nifekalant's potential use as a first aid drug in an emergency care setting. The PubMed database was used to identify papers, using keywords nifekalant, MS-551, amiodarone and lidocaine. Nifekalant hydrochloride, formally known as MS-551, is a class III antiarrhythmic agent which acts only by increasing the time course of myocardial repolarization. It was developed and is currently being used only in Japan for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. It is a non-selective K(+) channel blocker without any β-blocking actions. Administration of nifekalant suppressed sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in acute coronary syndrome patients, and in cardiac arrest victims as well as during or after cardiac surgery. The major adverse effect of nifekalant is QT interval prolongation and occurrence of torsades de pointes which requires frequent monitoring of the QT interval during nifekalant infusion with adequate dose adjustment. Nifekalant is a possible effective antiarrhythmic agent for refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Further clinical studies are required before nifekalant is routinely used in the emergency care setting.

Use of Intravenous Amiodarone in the Treatment of Nifekalant-Resistant Arrhythmia: A Review of 11 Consecutive Cases with Severe Heart Failure

Background: Both nifekalant hydrochloride (NIF), a selective I_Kr blocker, and intravenous amiodarone (AMD), a multi-channel (including I_Kr blocking) blocker, have been reported to be efficacious for refractory arrhythmias. However, the optimal use of those antiarrhythmic drugs for refractory arrhythmia with severe heart failure has not been established. Intravenous AMD might be effective for arrhythmias refractory to NIF in patients with severe heart failure. Here, we report that intravenous amiodarone was effective in the treatment of nifekalant-resistant in a group of arrhythmia patients with severe heart failure. Methods: Eleven severe heart failure patients who had received intravenous AMD for treatment of NIF-resistant arrhythmias were included in this study, and retrospective analysis was performed. Clinical efficacy (terminative and preventive effects on arrhythmia) of intravenous AMD was evaluated. Results: All cases were emergent cases and had depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (30 ± 13%). Clinical arrhythmias were ventricular fibrillation (VF) in four patients, ventricular tachycardia (VT) in six patients, and atrial fibrillation (AF) in one patient. NIF was administered to all patients by intravenous injection. After administration of NIF, VT/VF/AF was terminated in seven of the 10 patients, but a preventive effect was not obtained in any of the patients (NIF-resistance). Intravenous AMD (maintenance dose: 484 ± 166 mg/day) was effective both in termination (80%) and in prevention (80%) of VT/VF events in those patients. It was also effective in termination (80%) and prevention (60%) of AF events refractory to NIF. During continuous AMD administration, no significant adverse effects or proarrhythmic effects were observed in any of the patients. Five patients died within one month, but there was no arrhythmic deaths. Conclusions: Intravenous AMD was effective in NIF-resistant lethal arrhythmias and was relatively safe in emergent cases with severe heart failure.

Report from J-PULSE multicenter registry of patients with shock-resistant out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with nifekalant hydrochloride

BACKGROUND

Nifekalant hydrochloride (NIF) is an intravenous class-III antiarrhythmic agent that purely blocks the K(+)-channel without inhibiting β-adrenergic receptors. The present study was designed to investigate the feasibility of NIF as a life-saving therapy for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Japanese Population-based Utstein-style study with basic and advanced Life Support Education study was a multi-center registry study with 4 participating institutes located at the northern urban area of Osaka, Japan. Eligible patients were those treated with NIF because of out-of-hospital VF refractory to 3 or more precordial shocks and intravenous epinephrine. Between February 2006 and February 2007, 17 patients were enrolled for the study. The time from a call for emergency medical service to the first shock was 12(6-26)min. The time from the first shock to the NIF administration was 25.5(9-264)min and the usage dose of NIF was 25(15-210)mg. When excluding 3 patients in whom percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was applied before NIF administration, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation was 86% and the rate of admission alive to the hospital was 79%. One patient developed torsade de pointes.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of NIF seems to be feasible as a potential therapy for advanced cardiac life-support in patients with out-of-hospital VF, and therefore further study is warranted.

Comparison of the efficacy of nifekalant and amiodarone in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of nifekalant and amiodarone in the treatment of cardiac arrest in a porcine model.

METHODS

After 4min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, animals were randomly treated with nifekalant (2mgkg(-1)), amiodarone (5mgkg(-1)) or saline placebo (n=12 pigs per group). Precordial compression and ventilation were initiated after drug administration and defibrillation was attempted 2min later. Hemodynamics were continuously measured for 6h after successful resuscitation.

RESULTS

Compared with saline, nifekalant and amiodarone equally decreased the number of electric shocks, defibrillation energy, epinephrine dose, and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation required for successful resuscitation (P<0.01). The incidence of restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and the 24-h survival rate were higher in both antiarrhythmic drug groups (P<0.05) vs. the saline group. Furthermore, post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction at 4-6h after successful resuscitation was improved in animals given antiarrhythmic drugs as compared with the saline group (P<0.05). There were no differences between nifekalant and amiodarone for any of these parameters.

CONCLUSION

The effect of nifekalant was similar to that of amiodarone for improving defibrillation efficacy and for the treatment of cardiac arrest. Administration of either nifekalant or amiodarone before defibrillation increased the ROSC and 24-h survival rates and improved post-resuscitation cardiac function in this porcine model.

Nifekalant versus lidocaine for in-hospital shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of nifekalant, a pure class III anti-arrhythmic drug, and lidocaine in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2005 and March 2008, we conducted a prospective, two-arm, cluster observational study, in which participating hospitals were pre-registered either to the nifekalant arm or the lidocaine arm. Patients were enrolled if they had in-hospital VF or VT resistant to at least two defibrillation shocks. Congenital or drug-induced long QT syndrome was excluded. The primary end-point was termination of VF or VT with/without additional shock. The secondary end-points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 1-month survival and survival to hospital discharge. We also assessed the frequency of adverse events, including asystole, pulseless electrical activity and torsade de pointes.

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients were enrolled. After nifekalant, 22 of 27 patients showed termination of VF or VT, as compared with 15 of 28 patients treated with lidocaine with/without additional shock (odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-13.0; P=0.03). Twenty-three of 27 patients given nifekalant showed ROSC, as compared with 15 of 28 patients given lidocaine (OR: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.4-18.2; P=0.01). There was no difference in 1-month survival or survival to hospital discharge between the nifekalant and lidocaine arms. There was a higher incidence of asystole with lidocaine (7 of 28 patients) than with nifekalant (0 of 27 patients) (P=0.005). Torsade de pointes was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Nifekalant was more effective than lidocaine for termination of arrhythmia and for ROSC in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital VF or VT (umin-CTR No. UMIN 000001781).

Clinical study of the acute effects of intravenous nifekalant on the defibrillation threshold in patients with persistent and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic agents are considered to have significant effects on the defibrillation energy requirement, so this study investigated the effects of nifekalant on defibrillation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-two patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent electrical cardioversion via intracardiac electrode catheters prior to and after the intravenous administration of nifekalant. The success rate of the defibrillation and change in the defibrillation threshold using sequential incremental defibrillation energy deliveries was investigated. In addition, the parameters that could predict the beneficial effects of nifekalant were also assessed. Nifekalant significantly decreased the defibrillation energy requirement in 13 of the 42 cases, and nifekalant also converted AF to sinus rhythm with an identical energy to that of the last unsuccessful defibrillation in 21 of 42 cases. The success of defibrillation seemed to be dependent on significant prolongation of the intracardiac atrial electrogram intervals during AF by the nifekalant.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous nifekalant significantly improved the electrical defibrillation efficacy in patients with persistent AF that was resistant to defibrillation, without any serious adverse effects.

Prevention of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia by a novel and pure class-III agent, nifekalant hydrochloride

Nifekalant hydrochloride (NIF) is a novel intravenous class-III antiarrhythmic agent with a pirimidinedione structure that purely blocks the K+ channel without inhibiting beta-adrenergic receptors. The authors investigated the efficacy of NIF for refractory ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). They studied 30 patients treated with an intravenous infusion of NIF [ 26 men, 4 women; age: 63 +/- 17 (mean +/- SD) years] at a dose of 0.19 +/- 0.14 mg/kg body weight per hour. Sixteen were patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and 14 were patients with chronic structural heart disease (Chr-HD). Amiodarone and sotalol had already been administered to 9 patients with Chr-HD before the administration of NIF. The QT and T peak-end (Tp-e) intervals were measured and corrected by Bazett's method (QTc, cTp-e). The left ventricular ejection fraction was depressed (28 +/- 9%). NIF was effective for preventing VT/VF without proarrhythmia and hemodynamic deterioration in 21 patients (70%; 12 with ACS; 9 with Chr-HD), but ineffective in 4 patients (all with Chr-HD). The QTc prolongation in the responders was more pronounced than in the nonresponders (25% +/- 15% versus 5% +/- 7% increase; P < 0.05). Proarrhythmic torsade de pointes (TdP) developed transiently in the remaining 5 patients in whom the cTp-e was markedly increased compared with that in the responders (93% +/- 49% versus 37% +/- 41% increase; P < 0.05). In conclusion, these findings indicate that the intravenous administration of NIF is useful in the emergent treatment of inhibiting drug-refractory VT/VF, although proarrhythmic TdP owing to an enhancement of transmural dispersion of repolarization needs to be taken into account.

Comparison of nifekalant and lidocaine for the treatment of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Although nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic agent without negative inotropic activity, its effect in patients with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation that persisted after 3 shocks from an external defibrillator, intravenous epinephrine, and another shock were retrospectively studied. The patients received lidocaine from January 1997 through June 2001 and nifekalant from July 2001 through December 2004. Short-term survival rates (survival to hospital admission and 24-h survival) were compared between the groups. The study group comprised 120 patients (mean age: 62+/-16 years): 55 received nifekalant and 65 received lidocaine. Age, sex, history of ischemic heart disease, whether arrest was witnessed or not and time to arrival at the hospital did not differ significantly between the groups. As compared with lidocaine, nifekalant was associated with significantly higher rates of survival to hospital admission (67% vs 37%, p<0.001) and 24-h survival (53% vs 31%, p=0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with nifekalant and early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation were independent predictors of 24-h survival.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with lidocaine, nifekalant may improve short-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation.

Mechanisms of destabilization and early termination of spiral wave reentry in the ventricle by a class III antiarrhythmic agent, nifekalant

Nifekalant (NF) is a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent that is effective in preventing life-threatening ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). We investigated mechanisms of destabilization and early termination of spiral-type reentrant VT by NF in a two-dimensional subepicardial myocardial layer of Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 21) using a high-resolution optical action potential mapping system. During basic stimulation, NF (0.1 microM) caused uniform prolongation of action potential duration (APD) without affecting conduction velocity and an increase of APD restitution slope. VTs induced by direct current stimulation in the presence of NF were of shorter duration (VTs > 30 s: 2/54 NF vs. 19/93 control). During VTs in control (with visible rotors), the wave front chased its own tail with a certain distance (repolarized zone), and they seldom met each other. The average number of phase singularity (PS) points was 1.31 +/- 0.14 per 665 ms (n = 7). In the presence of NF, the wave front frequently encountered its own tail, causing a transient breakup of the spiral wave or sudden movement of the rotation center (spatial jump of PS). The average number of PS was increased to 1.63 +/- 0.22 per 665 ms (n = 7, P < 0.05) after NF. The mode of spontaneous termination of rotors in control was in most cases (9/10, 90.0%) the result of mutual annihilation of counterrotating wave fronts. With NF, rotors frequently terminated by wave front collision with the atrioventricular groove (12/19, 63.2%) or by trapping the spiral tip in a refractory zone (7/19, 36.8%). Destabilization and early termination of spiral wave reentry induced by NF are the result of a limited proportion of excitable tissue after modulation of repolarization.

Efficacy of nifekalant hydrochloride in the treatment of fatal ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic heart disease

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), which causes hemodynamic instability, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) sometimes occur in patients with severe underlying cardiovascular disease such as myocardial ischemia or infarction, and are associated with high mortality. This report presents the efficacy of nifekalant hydrochloride (nifekalant), a pure class III antiarrhythmic agent, in treating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in such patients. From June 2000, when nifekalant became commercially available in Japan, to May 2003, 30 ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with VT/VF resistant to direct-current (DC) countershock received nifekalant in our hospital. These 30 patients served as the nifekalant group in this study. As a control group, we also included 33 IHD patients with VT/VF that had been resistant to DC countershock upon or during hospitalization between January 1996 and May 2000 before nifekalant became commercially available. No significant differences were observed in patient background factors and treatments between the two groups. The rates of death within 48 hours of occurrence of VT/VF were significantly lower in the nifekalant group (7%, 2/30) than in the control group (27%, 9/33; P < 0.03). The rates of cardiac death during hospitalization were also significantly lower in the nifekalant group (40%, 12/30) than in the control group (67%, 22/33; P < 0.03). The rates of survival until hospital discharge were significantly higher in the nifekalant group (57%, 17/30) than in the control group (30%, 10/33; P < 0.03). Multivariate analysis of all 63 patients revealed nifekalant administration was the factor that significantly improved the mortality (odds ratio for cardiac death, 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07 to 0.95; P = 0.041). Nifekalant improves the prognosis for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia in IHD patients.

Nifekalant hydrochloride suppresses severe electrical storm in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Some patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) suffer from burst of inappropriate multiple discharges (severe electrical storm), and because the current therapeutic options are limited, the effect of nifekalant hydrochloride, a new class III drug, on severe electrical storm was investigated in the present study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ninety-one consecutive patients treated with ICD were included in the study (M 70; mean age 58 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 45+/-15%). Severe electrical storm was defined as more than 10 ICD discharges within 1 h. During a mean follow-up period of 30+/-13 months, 41/91 (45%) patients had appropriate ICD therapy for arrhythmias and severe electrical storm occurred in 11 of them (12%) at 20+/-18 months after ICD implantation. The mean number of ICD discharges/h during severe electrical storm was 18+/-12. In 4 of 10 patients, severe electrical storm was successfully suppressed by a combination of deep sedation and beta-blocking agent; 6 other patients were refractory to this treatment, but severe electrical storm was successfully suppressed by intravenous administration of nifekalant hydrochloride with no adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Nifekalant hydrochloride is an effective and safe treatment for severe electrical storm.

Can Nifekalant Hydrochloride be Used as a First-Line Drug for Cardiopulmonary Arrest (CPA)?

BACKGROUND

Early defibrillation of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation (VT/VF) is an urgent and most important method of resuscitation for survival in cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). We have previously reported that nifekalant (NIF), a specific I(Kr) blocker developed in Japan, is effective for lidocaine (LID) resistant VT/VF in out-of-hospital CPA (OHCPA). However, little is known about the differences in the effect of NIF on OHCPA with acidosis and in-hospital CPA (IHCPA) without acidosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present study enrolled 91 cases of DC shock resistant VT/VF among 892 cases of CPA that occurred between June 2000 and May 2003. NIF was used (0.15-0.3 mg/kg) after LID according to the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) algorithm of Tokai University. The defibrillation rate was higher in the NIF group for both OHCPA and IHCPA than for LID alone, and the VT/VF rate reduction effect could be maintained even with acidosis. However, sinus bradycardia in OHCPA, and torsades de pointes in IHCPA were occasionally observed. These differences in adverse effects might be related to the amount of epinephrine, serum potassium levels, serum pH, and interaction with LID.

CONCLUSIONS

NIF had a favorable defibrillating effect in both CPA groups, and it shows promise of becoming a first-line drug for CPR.

Nifekalant Hydrochloride Administration During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves the Transmural Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization Experimental Study in a Canine Model of Cardiopulmonary Arrest

BACKGROUND

Because nifekalant hydrochloride (NIF) displayed a superior defibrillating effect on ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) patients, despite some QT prolongation, its effect on transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) in the left ventricle (LV) in an animal model of CPA was investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight beagle dogs were created with a myocardial infarction under anesthesia, and then VT/VF induction by continuous stimulation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were repeated. NIF (0.3 mg/kg) was administered under acidotic conditions (pH 7.26). The QTc interval measured by Y-lead ECG showed no significant prolongation before and after NIF. The activation recovery interval (ARI) measured by 64-lead LV surface mapping showed minimum ARI prolongation (40%) by NIF without maximum ARI prolongation, and as a result the ARI dispersion decreased by 67%. The repolarization time (RPT) with the plunge electrode showed 13-19% prolongation in the subendocardium and subepicardium with CPR, but NIF prolonged the RPT in the middle layer alone (17%), and as a result Plunge-TDR decreased by 82% (n=8, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of NIF during CPR decreased the TDR by RPT prolongation selectively in the middle layer. Because the subendocardial and subepicardial RPTs after CPR were already prolonged before NIF administration, it may have been the reason why the QT-prolonging effect of NIF was not reflected in the body surface ECG.

Defibrillation effects of intravenous nifekalant in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation

Nifekalant (NF), a pure K(+) channel blocker developed in Japan, has been reported to be effective in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. We studied its efficacy in 18 men and 4 women with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) admitted to our emergency department between August 2001 and March 2004. The number of DC shocks delivered for out-of-hospital VF, serum Na(+) and K(+), arterial blood pH, and base excess were compared in 8 patients treated with NF, 0.3 mg/kg i.v. followed by a continuous intravenous (group N) versus 14 patients treated with lidocaine, 2 mg/kg, i.v. (group C). The two groups were similar with respect to their baseline characteristics. Sinus rhythm returned in 5 of 8 patients in group N versus 2 of 14 patients in group C (P < 0.05). These seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, though all died within 1 month. The results of this study suggest that NF may be effective in defibrillation of out-of-hospital VF, though controlled studies are needed to confirm our observations.

Combined Effects of Nifekalant and Lidocaine on the Spiral-Type Re-Entry in a Perfused 2-Dimensional Layer of Rabbit Ventricular Myocardium

BACKGROUND

Spiral re-entry plays the principal role in the genesis of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). The specific I(Kr) blocker, nifekakant (NIF) has, often in combination with lidocaine (LID), recently been used in Japan to prevent recurrent VT/VF, but the combined effects of these drugs on spiral re-entry had never been investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A ventricular epicardial sheet was obtained from 13 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts by means of a cryoprocedure, and epicardial excitations were analyzed with a high-resolution optical mapping system. Nifekakant (0.5 micromol/L) caused significant prolongation of action potential duration (APD) and LID (3 micromol/L) attenuated the APD prolongation without affecting the conduction velocity. VT were induced in 6 hearts by cross-field stimulation, and single- or double-loop spirals circulating around variable functional block lines were visualized during the VT. Nifekakant reduced VT cycle length and caused early termination in association with destabilization of the spiral dynamics (prolongation of functional block line, frequent local conduction block, and extensive meandering). These modifications of spiral-type re-entrant VT by NIF were prevented by addition of LID.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of NIF on the spiral excitations are reversed by LID. This interaction should be taken into account when these drugs are used in combination to treat VT/VF.

Experience with nifekalant hydrochloride in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe ventricular dysfunction after dor operation

A 52-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy and severe ventricular dysfunction underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and left ventricular reconstruction (Dor operation). The patient developed acute onset of incessant ventricular tachycardia in the early postoperative period that was refractory to therapy with class I antiarrhythmic agents, and multiple attempts at electrical cardioversion were required. A combination of intravenous nifekalant hydrochloride and enteral amiodarone was elected as treatment for this recurrent incessant ventricular tachycardia. Nifekalant hydrochloride was administered as a loading dose (0.3 mg/kg/5 min), followed by an intravenous infusion (0.4 mg/kg/hr). Several days after initiating therapy, the patient no longer experienced episodes of ventricular tachycardia, and there was no compromise in hemodynamics. We conclude that nifekalant hydrochloride is a useful agent for suppression of ventricular tachycardia in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, especially during the early postoperative period.

Nifekalant hydrochloride, a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent, suppressed postoperative recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and the Dor approach

A patient with 3-vessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular aneurysm underwent coronary artery bypass grafting combined with the Dor approach. Five days later, ventricular tachycardia following short-coupled ventricular premature contractions suddenly occurred and was not responsive to class IB drugs (lidocaine and mexiletine), requiring frequent electrical cardioversion. After the administration of a novel class III drug, nifekalant hydrochloride, this electrical storm of ventricular tachycardia was completely suppressed together with the disappearance of ventricular premature contractions. Nifekalant hydrochloride (MS-551), a pure K(+) channel blocker, might be effective for postoperative recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias that are refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents.

Inhibitory effect of the class III antiarrhythmic drug nifekalant on HERG channels: mode of action

Nifekalant is a class III antiarrhythmic drug that has been shown to be effective against ventricular tachyarrhythmias in experimental animals and humans. We examined the detailed electrophysiological effects of nifekalant on human-ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Nifekalant inhibited the HERG current in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC(50) value of 7.9 microM although the drug did not inhibit the minK current in Xenopus oocytes, suggesting selective inhibition of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Kr)) in cardiomyocytes. Nifekalant showed a higher binding affinity for the open state than for the inactive state of HERG channels. Nifekalant inhibited HERG channels in a frequency-dependent manner. The onset of the blockade was rapid but the recovery from the block was slow. Nifekalant modified the voltage dependence and kinetics of HERG channel gating. Thus, nifekalant inhibits HERG channels in a voltage-dependent and frequency-dependent manner, and the inhibitory effect may underlie the clinical efficacy of the drug against ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Combination IK1 and IKr channel blockade: no additive lowering of the defibrillation threshold

Selective blockade of the inward rectifier potassium channel I(K1) by barium, or of the rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium channel I(Kr) by D,L-sotalol, prolongs repolarization and reduces the defibrillation threshold (DFT). This study hypothesized that combination I(K1) and I(Kr) channel block would produce concentration-dependent additive effects on DFT and ventricular refractoriness. A range of barium and D,L-sotalol concentrations, alone and in combination, were examined with respect to DFT, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and ventricular fibrillation cycle length (VFCL) in 133 Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Barium produced a concentration-dependent reduction of DFT (-49+/-4%), with concentration-dependent increases in VERP (26+/-6%) and VFCL (42+/-18%). D,L-Sotalol produced a concentration-dependent lowering of DFT (-53+/-6%) with a concentration-dependent increase in VFCL (34+/-8%) but not VERP. Low (1.6 microM), intermediate (3.1 microM), and high (12.5 microM) barium concentrations combined with varying D,L-sotalol concentrations produced equal or smaller decreases in DFT compared with corresponding doses of barium or D,L-sotalol alone. Except at the lowest concentrations of barium (1.6 and 3.1 microM) (p < 0.05), there was no significant additive interaction between barium and D,L-sotalol on VERP or VFCL. Combination I(K1) and I(Kr) channel block by barium and D,L-sotalol does not produce additive reduction of DFT.

Effect of atrial natriuretic peptide on electrical defibrillation efficacy

INTRODUCTION

In vitro studies have suggested that human atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) modulates the electrophysiologic properties of myocardial cells. This study assessed whether ANP could influence defibrillation efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 35 anesthetized dogs, the transcardiac defibrillation threshold (DFT) as well as hemodynamic and electrophysiologic variables were determined before and during treatment with ANP (n = 11), hydralazine (n = 11), or saline (n = 13). ANP (1.5 microg/kg + 0.2 microg/kg per min) increased the plasma concentration of cyclic GMP (a second messenger for ANP) and significantly decreased aortic blood pressure (mean 100+/-11 mmHg to 83+/-15 mmHg). ANP also prolonged ventricular repolarization (effective refractory period 157+/-7 msec to 165+/-11 msec) and markedly reduced DFT (5.4+/-1.2 J to 3.8+/-0.7 J [P < 0.01]) without changing pulmonary artery pressure or sinus cycle length. Neither saline nor hydralazine (1.5 mg/kg) had a significant effect on DFT (saline 4.7+/-2.1 J to 4.6+/-2.4 J; hydralazine 4.3+/-2.0 J to 4.2+/-1.9 J), although hydralazine caused pronounced hypotension (mean aortic pressure 103+/-9 mmHg to 74+/-13 mmHg).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that ANP increases defibrillation efficacy, and that this effect is not necessarily shared by other vasodilating agents.

Interactions between implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and class III agents

Although implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can successfully terminate ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs are often required to prevent recurrent events. Class III antiarrhythmic agents have emerged as the safest, most effective, and widely used agents in the 40-70% of ICD patients who require concomitant antiarrhythmic medication. Antiarrhythmic agents can influence the effectiveness of ICDs to terminate arrhythmias through their effect on defibrillation threshold. All class III agents share the ability to prolong ventricular refractoriness and those with "pure" class III activity consistently decrease defibrillation threshold in the normal canine heart model. Sotalol, amiodarone, and bretylium all have other Vaughan Williams class actions that influence their respective effects on defibrillation threshold. Sotalol has been associated with a decrease in defibrillation threshold in both animal and in clinical studies, whereas amiodarone has been associated with variable effects in animal models and an increase in defibrillation threshold in clinical studies. Additionally, antiarrhythmic agents may prolong ventricular tachycardia (VT) cycle length, which may affect the ability to pace terminate or cardiovert VT. Amiodarone has a moderate slowing effect on the VT cycle length. Finally, class III drugs also have proarrhythmic potential that may affect the defibrillator's function. Sotalol can be associated with dose-related torsade de pointes, whereas amiodarone may slow the VT cycle length below the tachycardia detection rate cutoff. In conclusion, class III pharmacotherapy can be safely administered in conjunction with ICD therapy as long as the interaction between these therapeutic modalities is appreciated.

MS-551 and KCB-328, two class III drugs aggravated adrenaline-induced arrhythmias

We investigated the proarrhythmic effects of MS-551 and KCB-328, class III antiarrhythmic drugs using adrenaline-induced arrhythmia models in halothane anaesthetized, closed-chest dogs. In the control period, adrenaline, starting from a low dose of 0.25 to up to 1.0 microg/kg/50 s i.v., was injected to determine the arrhythmia inducing dose and the non-inducing dose. After MS-551 or KCB-328 administration, the adrenaline injection was repeated and the interval between the injection and the occurrence of arrhythmia (latent interval), the changes in arrhythmic ratio (as calculated by dividing the number of ventricular premature contraction by the number of the total heart rate) and the severity of arrhythmia were observed. MS-551 infusion, 1 mg/kg/30 min, decreased the heart rate (HR) by 16% (P<0.01) and prolonged the QTc interval by 20% (P<0.01). During the 30 min of MS-551 infusion, arrhythmias occurred in three out of seven dogs (torsades de pointes (TdP) type VT in one dog). After these arrhythmias disappeared, MS-551 decreased the latent interval of the adrenaline arrhythmias produced by the inducing dose (30+/-2 s compared with 43+/-3 s of the control interval, P < 0.05), increased the arrhythmic ratio (P<0.05) and induced arrhythmias by non-inducing adrenaline doses (P<0.05). Effect of a new class III drug KCB-328 infusion, 0.3 mg/kg/30 min, was compared witih MS-551 using the same model. KCB-328 decreased the HR by 21% (P<0.01) and prolonged the QTc interval by 25% (P<0.01). During the 30 min of infusion, arrhythmias occurred in five out of seven dogs (TdP in two dogs). KCB-328 also decreased the latent interval of the adrenaline arrhythmias produced by the inducing doses (31+/-3 s compared with 49+/-7 s of the control period, P<0.05), but did not significantly alter the arrhythmic ratio. Adrenaline induced TdP only after MS-551 or KCB-328 was administered, i.e. after MS-551, 1 mg/kg/30 min, 3/7 versus 0/7 in the control; KCB, 0.3 mg/kg/30 min, 3/7 versus 0/7 in the control. To examine the direct arrhythmogenic effect of MS-551 and whether an adrenergic mechanism plays some role on this arrhythmogenesis, a bolus injection of MS-551, 3 mg/kg, was injected either without pre-treatment or after pre-treatment with propranolol 0.3 mg/kg. MS-551 induced arrhythmias in five out of seven dogs (TdP in one dog). Also in the propranolol pre-treated dogs, MS-551 induced arrhythmias in five out of seven dogs (TdP in 1 dog). In conclusion, these observations indicate that MS-551 and KCB-328 induced arrhythmias and intensified proarrhythmic effects of adrenaline, MS-551 being stronger than KCB-328 at the same QTc prolonging doses. The direct arrhythmogenic effect of MS-551 was not influenced by beta-blocker treatment.