Optimizing timing of surgical correction in patients with severe aortic regurgitation: role of symptoms

2023 Korean Society of Echocardiography position paper for diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, part I: aortic valve disease

This manuscript represents the official position of the Korean Society of Echocardiography on valvular heart diseases. This position paper focuses on the clinical management of valvular heart diseases with reference to the guidelines recently published by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology. The committee tried to reflect the recently published results on the topic of valvular heart diseases and Korean data by a systematic literature search based on validity and relevance. In part I of this article, we will review and discuss the current position of aortic valve disease in Korea.

Improving outcomes in carcinoid heart disease - learning from a single centre

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients with carcinoid syndrome develop carcinoid heart disease (CHD). Valve degeneration can lead to right heart failure, and worsening prognosis. Replacement of affected valves is an effective therapy. We reviewed patients treated with valve replacement to assess prognostic factors.

METHODS

CHD patients records who underwent valve replacement from 2003-2019 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent valve replacement. Mean (SD) age was 61 (11) years, 54% female. Eleven tumours were grade G1, with the remaining G2. NYHA pre-surgery mean (SD) 2.0 (0.7); post-surgery mean 1.2; follow-up mean (SD) 1.6 (0.8). Mean NYHA score difference from pre- to post-surgery -0.71 ( P  = 0.002). 88.5% two (PR & TR), 3.9% one, 3.9% three and 3.9% four valves replaced. 13 patients received Lu177 oxodotreotide; 27% completed four cycles. Mortality at 1 and 5 years follow up was 42% and 50% respectively. Cox proportional hazards model of survival from surgery, adjusting for age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (0.89-1.03) ( P  = 0.25)], four cycles of Lu177 oxodotreotide demonstrated HR 0.087 (0.0079-0.95) ( P  = 0.045) indicating improved survival.

DISCUSSION

Surgical patients were often NYHA grade II, and symptoms improved post-surgery. Four cycles of Lu177 oxodotreotide improved survival, although the confidence interval was wide. Further studies should be performed to assess Lu177 oxodotreotide in CHD.

Impact of early versus class I-triggered surgery on postoperative survival in severe aortic regurgitation: An observational study from the Aortic Valve Insufficiency and Ascending Aorta Aneurysm International Registry

OBJECTIVES

Class I triggers for severe and chronic aortic regurgitation surgery mainly rely on symptoms or systolic dysfunction, resulting in a negative outcome despite surgical correction. Therefore, US and European guidelines now advocate for earlier surgery. We sought to determine whether earlier surgery leads to improved postoperative survival.

METHODS

We evaluated the postoperative survival of patients who underwent surgery for severe aortic regurgitation in the international multicenter registry for aortic valve surgery, Aortic Valve Insufficiency and Ascending Aorta Aneurysm International Registry, over a median follow-up of 37 months.

RESULTS

Among 1899 patients (aged 49 ± 15 years, 85% were male), 83% and 84% had class I indication according to the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology, respectively, and most were offered repair surgery (92%). Twelve patients (0.6%) died after surgery, and 68 patients died within 10 years after the procedure. Heart failure symptoms (hazard ratio, 2.60 [1.20-5.66], P = .016) and either left ventricular end-systolic diameter greater than 50 mm or left ventricular end-systolic diameter index greater than 25 mm/m2 (hazard ratio, 1.64 [1.05-2.55], P = .030) predicted survival independently over and above age, gender, and bicuspid phenotype. Therefore, patients who underwent surgery based on any class I trigger had worse adjusted survival. However, patients who underwent surgery while meeting early imaging triggers (left ventricular end-systolic diameter index 20-25 mm/m2 or left ventricular ejection fraction 50% to 55%) had no significant outcome penalty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this international registry of severe aortic regurgitation, surgery when meeting class I triggers led to postoperative outcome penalty compared with earlier triggers (left ventricular end-systolic diameter index 20-25 mm/m2 or ventricular ejection fraction 50%-55%). This observation, which applies to expert centers where aortic valve repair is feasible, should encourage the global use of repair techniques and the conduction of randomized trials.

Heart valve disease gender difference in the era of transcatether treatment

Available data have demonstrated important sex-related differences in patients with valvular heart  disease, regarding clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes. Although the calcific aortic  stenosis (AS) is more frequent in men compared to women, the majority of AS patients over 80  years old are women, in whom fibrotic remodeling of aortic valve is typically found. Mitral valve  disease is more common in women. However females are under-referred or delayed referrals to  treatment, probably due to the absence of sex-based LV dimension values guiding surgical timing.  The development of transcatheter devices have revolutionized the treatment of valvular heart disease and increased the interest in this topic. In this context, the consideration of gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, treatment success, and prognosis is of great importance.    

Current controversies in aortic valve-preserving surgery

The clinical outcome of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) remains suboptimal, but surgery has been shown to have survival benefit over medical therapy. Postoperative survival is inferior in patients with reduced left ventricular function, and therefore early surgical intervention is recommended. Aortic valvuloplasty (AVP) is an attractive option to avoid the major drawbacks of prosthetic valves but has not been widely adopted. The etiology of AR is classified functionally into three groups: normal leaflet motion (type I), cusp prolapse (type II), and restriction (type III). Type I with dilatation of the sinus of Valsalva (type Ib) can be repaired by aortic valve reimplantation or aortic root remodeling with similar valve stability. Type I with dilatation of the aortic annulus (type Ic) can be managed by annuloplasty. Type II can be corrected by plication or resuspension techniques. Pericardial patch is necessary in AVP for type Id (perforation/fenestration) and type III but is associated with risk of recurrence. Bicuspid aortic valve is classified according to commissure angle: symmetrical, asymmetrical, and very asymmetrical. Tricuspidization is recommended for repair of very asymmetrical valves to avoid postoperative stenosis. Recent progress has achieved similar reoperation rates between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve repair. For Marfan syndrome, valve-sparing root replacement is advantageous compared to Bentall operation regarding late survival, thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events, and endocarditis. Similar findings have been reported in acute aortic dissection. Both remodeling and reimplantation procedures provide similar favorable outcomes in these settings. Recent advances in AVP are summarized by quantitative assessment of cusp configuration (effective height and geometric height), graft size decision, use of template to cut the graft, and videoscopic assessment of post-repair cusp configuration. Due to these advances, AVP shows superior results to replacement surgery. Further concrete evidence with larger case volumes and longer observation periods are necessary to popularize AVP.

Population study of sex-based outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement

Background

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is a key strategy for the treatment of aortic valve disease. However, studies have involved primarily male patients, and whether the benefits of this approach can be extrapolated to female patients is unclear.

Methods

Clinical and administrative datasets for 12,207 patients undergoing isolated SAVR in Ontario from 2008 to 2019 were linked. Male and female patients were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting. Mortality, endocarditis, and major hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, as well as 2 composite outcomes-major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCE) and patient-derived adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE)-and their component events, were compared in the weighted groups with a stratified log-rank test.

Results

A total of 7485 male patients and 4722 female patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 5.2 years in both sexes. All-cause mortality did not differ between sexes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.949 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.851-1.059]). Male sex was associated with an increased risk of new-onset dialysis (HR 0.689 [95% CI 0.488-0.974]). Female sex was associated with a significantly increased risk of both new-onset heart failure (HR 1.211 [95% CI 1.051-1.394], P = 0.0081) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.200 [95% CI 1.036-1.390], P = 0.015). No statistically significant differences were seen in any of the other secondary outcomes between sexes.

Conclusions

This population health study demonstrated that survival did not differ between male and female patients undergoing SAVR. Significant sex-related differences were found in the risk of heart failure and new-onset dialysis, but these findings should be considered exploratory and require further study.

Epidemiology of Valvular Heart Disease

Acquired diseases of the aortic and mitral valves are the most common cause of morbidity and mortality among Valvular heart diseases. Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasing in incidence in the United States (4,43 US), driven largely by an aging demographic. Aortic valve replacement is the only effective treatment of AS and has a dramatic mortality benefit. Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is the most common form of valvular heart disease (VHD) in the US, whereby MR is most often the result of mitral valve prolapse; rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a more common etiology of MR in underdeveloped countries. interventions for MR in the US are increasing.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021. Structure: Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

AIM

The "2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" replaces the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure" and the "2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure." The 2022 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with heart failure.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2020 to December 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant clinical trials and research studies, published through September 2021, were also considered. This guideline was harmonized with other American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines published through December 2021.

STRUCTURE

Heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. The 2022 heart failure guideline provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to managing patients with heart failure, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' interests. Many recommendations from the earlier heart failure guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data. Value statements are provided for certain treatments with high-quality published economic analyses.

Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement for Chronic Aortic Insufficiency: Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated outcomes and risk factors for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic insufficiency (AI) in a national cohort. We analyzed the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors for SAVR for AI in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

METHODS

The national database was queried for patients with moderate or greater AI undergoing isolated SAVR between July 2011 and December 2018. Patients with moderate or greater aortic stenosis, acute dissection, active endocarditis, concomitant procedures, or emergent operation were excluded. AI was staged using guideline criteria based on symptoms and ventricular remodeling. Operative mortality and morbidity were compared between stages, and risk factors for operative death were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 12,564 patients underwent isolated SAVR for AI from 2011 to 2018. Patients were most frequently AI stage D (7019 [57.5%]), compared with B (1405 [11.2%]), C1 (1128 [9.0%]), or C2 (1325 [10.5%]). Operative mortality was 1.1% overall, and increased between stage C1, C2, and D (0.4% vs 0.7% vs 1.6%, respectively, P < .01), along with major morbidity (5.1% vs 7.5% vs 9.9%, respectively; P < .01). Mortality was higher in patients with severe ventricular dilation and an ejection fraction of less than 0.30 (2.7% vs 1.0%, P < .01). Risk factors for death were symptomatic AI, decreased ejection fraction, age, weight, body surface area, and dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative mortality and morbidity for isolated SAVR for AI is very low in a national cohort, providing a benchmark for future transcatheter approaches. Operative risk increases with advanced ventricular remodeling. SAVR before development of ventricular remodeling may be appropriate in patients with severe AI.

Sex-based differences in left ventricular remodeling in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation: a multi-modality study

BACKGROUND

Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) leads to left ventricular (LV) remodeling; however, little data exist regarding sex-based differences in LV remodeling in this setting. We sought to compare LV remodeling and AR severity, assessed by echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), to discern sex-based differences.

METHODS

Patients with ≥ moderate chronic AR by echocardiography who underwent CMR within 90 days between December 2005 and October 2015 were included. Nonlinear regression models were built to assess the effect of AR regurgitant fraction (RF) on LV remodeling. A generalized linear model and Bland Altman analyses were constructed to evaluate differences between CMR and echocardiography. Referral for surgical intervention based on symptoms and LV remodeling was evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 243 patients (48.3 ± 16.6 years, 58 (24%) female), 119 (49%) underwent surgical intervention with a primary indication of severe AR, 97 (82%) men, 22 (18%) women. Significant sex differences in LV remodeling emerged on CMR. Women demonstrated significantly smaller LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) (96.8 ml/m2 vs 125.6 ml/m2, p < 0.001), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) (41.1 vs 54.5 ml/m2, p < 0.001), blunted LV dilation in the setting of increasing AR severity (LVEDVI p value < 0.001, LVESVI p value 0.011), and LV length indexed (8.32 vs 9.69 cm, p < 0.001). On Bland Altman analysis, a significant interaction with sex and LV diameters was evident, demonstrating a significant increase in the difference between CMR and echocardiography measurements as the LV enlarged in women: LVEDVI (p = 0.006), LVESVI (p < 0.001), such that echocardiographic measurements increasingly underestimated LV diameters in women as the LV enlarged. LV length was higher for males with a linear effect from RF (p < 0.001), with LV length increasing at a higher rate with increasing RF for males compared to females (two-way interaction with sex p = 0.005). Sphericity volume index was higher for men after adjusting for a relative wall thickness (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

CMR assessment of chronic AR revealed significant sex differences in LV remodeling and significant echocardiographic underestimation of LV dilation, particularly in women. Defining optimal sex-based CMR thresholds for surgical referral should be further developed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NA.

Sex Differences and Similarities in Valvular Heart Disease

As populations age worldwide, the burden of valvular heart disease has grown exponentially, and so has the proportion of affected women. Although rheumatic valve disease is declining in high-income countries, degenerative age-related causes are rising. Calcific aortic stenosis and degenerative mitral regurgitation affect a significant proportion of elderly women, particularly those with comorbidities. Women with valvular heart disease have been underrepresented in many of the landmark studies which form the basis for guideline recommendations. As a consequence, surgical referrals in women have often been delayed, with worse postoperative outcomes compared with men. As described in this review, a more recent effort to include women in research studies and clinical trials has increased our knowledge about sex-based differences in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, treatment options, outcomes, and prognosis.

Arrhythmias in Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Gaps in Knowledge and the Way Forward

The prevalence of both organic valvular heart disease (VHD) and cardiac arrhythmias is high in the general population, and their coexistence is common. Both VHD and arrhythmias in the elderly lead to an elevated risk of hospitalization and use of health services. However, the relationships of the two conditions is not fully understood and our understanding of their coexistence in terms of contemporary management and prognosis is still limited. VHD-induced left ventricular dysfunction/hypertrophy and left atrial dilation lead to both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. On the other hand, arrhythmias can be considered as an independent condition resulting from a coexisting ischemic or non-ischemic substrate or idiopathic ectopy. Both atrial and ventricular VHD-induced arrhythmias may contribute to clinical worsening and be a turning point in the natural history of VHD. Symptoms developed in patients with VHD are not specific and may be attributable to hemodynamical consequences of valve disease but also to other cardiac conditions including arrhythmias which are notably prevalent in this population. The issue how to distinguish symptoms related to VHD from those related to atrial fibrillation (AF) during decision making process remains challenging. Moreover, AF is a traditional limit of echocardiography and an important source of errors in assessment of the severity of VHD. Despite recent progress in understanding the pathophysiology and prognosis of postoperative AF, many questions remain regarding its prevention and management. Furthermore, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias can predispose patients with VHD to sudden cardiac death. Evidence for a putative link between arrhythmias and outcome in VHD is growing but available data on targeted therapies for VHD-related arrhythmias, including monitoring and catheter ablation, is scarce. Despite growing evidences, more research focused on the prognosis and optimal management of VHD-related arrhythmias is still required. We aimed to review the current evidence and identify gaps in knowledge about the prevalence, prognostic considerations, and treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in common subtypes of organic VHD.

Optimal Management of Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation - How to Determine Cutoff Values for Surgical Intervention?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular heart disease, but the optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial. In the natural history of chronic severe AR, sudden death is rare, and the annual mortality rate is comparatively low. Considering the hemodynamic features of combined volume and pressure overload and long-term compensation in patients with chronic AR, symptoms related to AR do not frequently occur. Therefore, the progression of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is a key factor in determining the timing of surgical intervention in patients with severe chronic AR. In addition to symptoms, an ejection fraction <50% and an LV endsystolic diameter (LVESD) >45 mm are appropriate cutoff values for surgical intervention in Japanese patients, whereas LV end-diastolic diameter is not a good indicator. An LVESD index of 25 mm/m²is controversial, because adjusting for body size may cause overcorrection in Japanese patients who have a small body size compared with Westerners. Accumulation of data from the Japanese population is indispensable for establishing guidelines on optimal management of patients with chronic AR.

Reduced left ventricular contractility, increased diastolic operant stiffness and high energetic expenditure in patients with severe aortic regurgitation without indication for surgery

OBJECTIVES

Recent mortality studies showed worse prognosis in patients (ARNS) with severe aortic regurgitation and preserved ejection fraction (EF) not fulfilling the criteria of current guidelines for surgery. The aim of our study was to analyse left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function and mechanical energetics to find haemodynamic explanations for the reduced prognosis of these patients and to seek a new concept for surgery.

METHODS

Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and echo-based single-beat pressure-volume analyses were performed in patients with ARNS (LV end-diastolic diameter <70 mm, EF >50%, GLS > -19% n = 41), with indication for surgery (ARS; n = 19) and in mild hypertensive controls (C; n = 20). Additionally, end-systolic elastance (LV contractility), stroke work and total energy (pressure-volume area) were calculated.

RESULTS

ARNS demonstrated significantly depressed LV contractility versus C: end-systolic elastance (1.58 ± 0.7 vs 2.54 ± 0.8 mmHg/ml; P < 0.001), despite identical EF (EF: 59 ± 6% vs 59 ± 7%). Accordingly, GLS was decreased [-15.7 ± 2.7% (n = 31) vs -21.2 ± 2.4%; P < 0.001], end-diastolic volume (236 ± 90 vs 136 ± 30 ml; P < 0.001) and diastolic operant stiffness were markedly enlarged, as were pressure-volume area and stroke work, indicating waste of energy. The correlation of GLS versus end-systolic elastance was good (r = -0.66; P < 0.001). ARNS and ARS patients demonstrated similar haemodynamic disorders, whereas only GLS was worse in ARS.

CONCLUSIONS

ARNS patients almost matched the ARS patients in their haemodynamic and energetic deterioration, thereby explaining poor prognosis reported in literature. GLS has been shown to be a reliable surrogate for LV contractility, possibly overestimating contractility due to exhausted preload reserve in aortic regurgitation patients. GLS may outperform conventional echo parameters to predict more precisely the timing of surgery.

Valvular Disease and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome of shortness of breath and/or exercise intolerance secondary to elevated left ventricular filling pressures at rest or with exertion either as a result of primary diastolic dysfunction (primary HFpEF) or secondary to specific underlying causes (secondary HFpEF). In secondary HFpEF, early intervention of underlying valvular heart disease generally improves symptoms and prolongs survival. In primary HFpEF, there is increasing awareness of the existence and prognostic implications of secondary atrioventricular valve regurgitation. Further studies will clarify their mechanisms and the effectiveness of valvular intervention in this intriguing HFpEF subgroup.

l -Arginine Can Enhance the Beneficial Effect of Losartan in Patients with Chronic Aortic Regurgitation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Information about the effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on the hemodynamic and cardiac structure in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (CAR) and isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is limited. This study planned to test the hypothesis that l -arginine could further enhance the beneficial effect of an ARB, losartan, and provide a favorable effect on the natural history of CAR and ISH. Sixty patients with CAR and ISH were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing hemodynamic and ultrasonic change in two treatment arms: losartan +  l -arginine and losartan-only treated groups. Serial echocardiographic and hemodynamic studies were evaluated before and after treatment. Both groups had a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), LV mass index (LVMI), and LV mean wall stress after 6- and 12-month treatment ( p <0.01 in all comparisons). Both groups had a significant increase in LV ejection fraction and exercise duration after 6- and 12-month treatment ( p  < 0.01 in all comparisons). Using multivariate linear regression analysis, only losartan +  l -arginine therapy achieved a significantly lower LVESVI (38.89 ± 0.23 mL/m ² ), LVEDVI (102.3 ± 0.3 mL/m ² ), LVMI (107.6 ± 0.3 g/m ² ), SBP (123.5 ± 1.0 mm Hg), and greater exercise duration (7.38 ± 0.02 minutes) than those of the losartan-only treated groups ( p <0.01 in all comparisons). These findings suggest that early co-administrative strategy provides a beneficial approach to favorably influence the natural history of CAR.

The Evolving Epidemiology of Elderly with Degenerative Valvular Heart Disease: The Guangzhou (China) Heart Study

Aim

The present study was aimed at investigating the prevalence, incidence, progression, and prognosis of degenerative valvular heart disease (DVHD) in permanent residents aged ≥65 years from Guangzhou, China.

Methods

This was a prospective study based on community population. Over a 3-year span, we conducted repeated questionnaires, blood tests, and echocardiographic and electrocardiogram examinations (2018) of a random sample of initially 3538 subjects.

Results

The prevalence of DVHD increased with age, average values being 30.6%, 49.2%, and 62.9% in 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years of age, respectively. The incidence rate was 1.7%/year. Aortic stenosis was the result of DVHD, and the mean transvalvular pressure gradient increased by 5.6 mmHg/year. The increase of mild aortic stenosis was lower than that of more severe disease, showing a nonlinear development of gradient, but with great individual variations. Mortality was significantly increased in the DVHD group (HR = 2.49). Risk factors for higher mortality included age (χ² = 1.9, P < 0.05), renal insufficiency (χ² = 12.5, P < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (χ² = 12.2, P < 0.01), mitral regurgitation (χ² = 1.8, P < 0.05), and tricuspid regurgitation (χ² = 6.7, P < 0.05) in a DVHD population.

Conclusions

DVHD was highly prevalent among residents in southern China. With the progression of the disease, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient accelerated. DVHD was an independent predictor of death, and the mortality was higher in those with older age, renal insufficiency, atrial fibrillation, mitral regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

A comparison of the clinical efficacy of echocardiography and magnetic resonance for chronic aortic regurgitation

AIMS

Timing surgery in chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) relies mostly on echocardiography. However, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may be more accurate for quantifying regurgitation and left ventricular (LV) remodelling. We aimed to compare the technical and clinical efficacies of echocardiography and CMR to account for the severity of the disease, the degree of LV remodelling, and predict AR-related outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 263 consecutive patients with isolated AR undergoing echocardiography and CMR. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 76 out of 197 initially asymptomatic patients reached the primary endpoint of AR-related events: 6 patients (3%) were admitted for heart failure, and 70 (36%) underwent surgery. Adjusted survival models based on CMR improved the predictions of the primary endpoint based on echocardiography: R2 = 0.37 vs. 0.22, χ2 = 97 vs. 49 (P < 0.0001), and C-index = 0.80 vs. 0.70 (P < 0.001). This resulted in a net classification index of 0.23 (0.00-0.46, P = 0.046) and an integrated discrimination improvement of 0.12 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.58, P = 0.02). CMR-derived regurgitant fraction (<28, 28-37, or >37%) and LV end-diastolic volume (<83, 183-236, or >236 mL) adequately stratified patients with normal EF. The agreement between techniques for grading AR severity and assessing LV dilatation was poor, and CMR showed better reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR improves the clinical efficacy of ultrasound for predicting outcomes of patients with AR. This is due to its better reproducibility and accuracy for grading the severity of the disease and its impact on the LV. Regurgitant fraction, LV ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume obtained by CMR most adequately predict AR-related events.

Association of Left Ventricular Volume in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Aortic Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common valvular lesion associated with increased mortality once the left ventricle enlarges significantly or develops systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50%). Valve guidelines recommend aortic valve repair or replacement (AVR) for left ventricular (LV) linear end-systolic dimension ≥ 50 mm or end-diastolic dimension ≥ 65 mm. However, chamber quantification guidelines recommend using LV volume for LV size determination because linear measurements may not accurately reflect LV remodeling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of LV volumes with linear dimensions, interobserver variability in the estimation of volumes, and the association of volumes with outcomes in patients with AR.

METHODS

A total of 1,100 consecutive patients with chronic moderate to severe and severe AR on echocardiography between 2004 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The modified Simpson disk summation method was used for LV volume estimation. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; the secondary outcome was mortality censored at AVR.

RESULTS

Patients' age was 60 ± 17 years, and 198 were women (18%). Volumes were measured using the biplane method in 939 patients (85%) and the monoplane method in 161 (15%); end-systolic volume was normal in 169 (11%). Correlations between volumes and linear dimensions were 0.5 for end-diastolic volume and 0.6 for end-systolic volume. At median follow-up of 5.4 years (interquartile range, 2.4-10.0 years), 216 patients had died and 539 had undergone AVR. Indexed LV end-systolic volume (iLVESV) and indexed left ventricular end-systolic dimension were both associated with mortality and symptoms, but the association of iLVESV was stronger. iLVESV, age, male gender, Charlson comorbidity index, New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, and time-dependent AVR were independently associated with all-cause mortality. Interobserver variability in the estimation of LV volumes in 200 patients included intraclass coefficients of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.95) for end-diastolic volume and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93) for end-systolic volume. Patients with iLVESV ≥ 45 mL/m² had lower survival and a higher prevalence of symptoms than those with volumes < 45 mL/m².

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic LV volume assessment had good reproducibility in patients with moderate to severe and severe AR. The correlation between linear dimensions and volumes was limited. Both iLVESV and indexed left ventricular end-systolic dimension were associated with worse outcomes, but the association of iLVESV was stronger. iLVESV ≥ 45 mL/m² was associated with worse outcomes.

Current trends in aortic valve-preserving surgery

The natural history of aortic regurgitation is not as benign as once believed, even in asymptomatic patients with preserved left ventricular function. Aortic valve surgery can prolong survival in these patients. However, both mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement have major disadvantages, especially in young patients. Aortic valve-preserving surgery has attracted a great deal of attention because it has a significant survival benefit over replacement. Nonetheless, aortic valve-preserving surgery has not been widely adopted due to the complexity of the technique and assessment (i.e., long learning curve). With recent technical and theoretical advances, aortic valve-preserving surgery has increasingly been performed with better outcomes, and therefore earlier surgical intervention in cases of aortic regurgitation has been considered. Recent advances in aortic valve-preserving surgery include repair-oriented classification of the etiology of aortic regurgitation, objective assessment of the cusp configuration (i.e., effective height and geometric height), use of aortic annuloplasty, introduction of two reproducible valve-sparing root replacement procedures (i.e., aortic valve reimplantation and aortic root remodeling techniques), standardization of aortic valve-preserving surgery, and assessment of cusp configuration with aortoscopy. A number of prospective multicenter studies are currently underway and will clarify the role of aortic valve-preserving surgery in the treatment of aortic regurgitation in the near future.

Sex Disparity in Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: Do Our Current Echocardiographic Reference Ranges Measure Up?

Reducing inequity in access to health care and disparity in health outcomes remain key objectives in cardiovascular medicine. Echocardiography is often the primary diagnostic tool used to detect cardiovascular disease (CVD), and relies on comparison with published reference ranges to appropriately detect pathology. Our understanding of the contribution of age, sex and ethnicity to quantification of cardiac size is improving, but cardiovascular disease management guidelines have yet to evolve. While recently, sex, age and ethnicity-specific reference values have been produced, treatment thresholds in many clinical guidelines do not differentiate between sexes. As a result, in order to reach management thresholds, women are often required to have more severe pathology. In order to reduce potential disadvantage to women, future research efforts should be directed to develop more personalised treatment approaches by identification of sex-appropriate management thresholds.

Early Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Disease: Effect on Mortality and Clinical Ramifications

Timing of aortic valve intervention for chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and/or aortic stenosis (AS) potentially affects long-term survival. The 2014 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) guidelines provide recommendations for the timing of intervention. Subsequent to the guidelines' release, several studies have been published that suggest a survival benefit from earlier timing of surgery for severe AR and/or AS. The aim of this review was to determine whether patients who have chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) and/or aortic stenosis (AS) have a survival benefit from earlier timing of aortic valve surgery. Medical databases were systematically searched from January 2015 to April 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that examined the timing of aortic valve replacement surgery for chronic AR and/or AS. For chronic AR, four observational studies and no RCTs were identified. For chronic AS, five observational studies, one RCT and one meta-analysis were identified. One observational study examining mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD) was identified. All of these studies, for AR, AS, and MAVD, found long-term survival benefit from timing of aortic valve surgery earlier than the current guidelines. Larger prospective RCTs are required to evaluate the benefit of earlier surgical intervention.

Integral Velocidade-Tempo da Insuficiência Aórtica: Um Novo Marcador Ecocardiográfico na Avaliação da Gravidade da Insuficiência Aórtica

Fundamento

A ecocardiografia é essencial para o diagnóstico e a quantificação da insuficiência aórtica (IA). A integral velocidade-tempo (IVT) do fluxo da IA pode estar relacionada à gravidade da IA.

Objetivo

Este estudo tem por objetivo avaliar se a IVT é um marcador ecocardiográfico de gravidade da IA.

Métodos

Foram incluídos todos os pacientes com IA nativa moderada ou grave e ritmo sinusal que visitaram o nosso laboratório de imagem entre janeiro e outubro de 2016. Todos os indivíduos foram submetidos a um ecocardiograma completo com medição da IVT da IA. A associação entre a IVT e a gravidade da IA foi analisada por regressão logística e modelos de regressão multivariada. Valores p<0,05 foram considerados estatisticamente significativos.

Resultados

Entre os 62 pacientes incluídos (68,5±14,9 anos; 64,5%: IA moderada; 35,5%: IA grave), a IVT foi maior em indivíduos com IA moderada em comparação àqueles com IA grave (2,2±0,5 m versus 1,9±0,5 m, p=0,01). Pacientes com IA grave apresentaram valores maiores de diâmetro diastólico final do ventrículo esquerdo (DDFVE) (56,1±7,1 mm versus 47,3±9,6 mm, p=0,001), volume diastólico final do ventrículo esquerdo (VDFVE) (171±36,5 mL versus 106±46,6 mL, p<0,001), orifício regurgitante efetivo (0,44±0,1 cm2 versus 0,18±0,1 cm2, p=0,002) e volume regurgitante (71,3±25,7 mL versus 42,5±10,9 mL, p=0,05), assim como menor fração de ejeção do ventrículo esquerdo (FEVE) (54,1±11,2% versus 63,2±13,3%, p=0,012). A IVT mostrou ser um marcador de gravidade da IA, independentemente do DDFVE, VDFVE e FEVE ( odds ratio 0,160, p=0,032) e da frequência cardíaca e pressão arterial diastólica (PAD) ( odds ratio 0,232, p=0,044).

Conclusões

A IVT do fluxo da IA apresentou associação inversa com a gravidade da IA, independentemente do diâmetro e volume do ventrículo esquerdo, frequência cardíaca, PAD e FEVE. A IVT pode ser um marcador de gravidade da IA em pacientes com IA nativa e ritmo sinusal. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0)

Predictors of Long-Term Outcome of Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Regurgitation With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Extreme Left Ventricular Dilatation

The management of severe aortic regurgitation (AR) in patients with reduced left ventricular function and extreme left ventricular dilatation presents a therapeutic dilemma. This study aims to assess risk factors of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for these particular population based on its performances. Two hundred twelve severe AR patients accompanied by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥70 mm who underwent isolated AVR between January 2007 and December 2016 were identified retrospectively. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic were used to analyze prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality while Kaplan-Meier analysis for long-term survival. Mean age was 56 ± 13 years with mean LVEF 40 ± 7% and LVEDD 78 ± 6 mm. In-hospital mortality rate was 7%, and survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 88 ± 4% and 73 ± 10%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis indicated in-hospital mortality was associated with preoperative age and LVEF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed LVEF = 35% was the best cut-off value at which to predict in-hospital death. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed patients with markedly reduced LV function (LVEF <35%) had lower survival rates compared with other patients with moderate LV dysfunction (LVEF 36% to 50%) (1-, 5-, and 10-year: 90 ± 4%, 64 ± 7%, and 55 ± 14%, vs 97 ± 1%, 94 ± 3%, and 76 ± 7%, p <0.001). An age-matched analysis showed similar trend (p = 0.020). In Conclusion, AVR may be unsafe for severe AR patients with markedly reduced LV function (LVEF <35%) and extreme left ventricular dilatation (LVEDD >70 mm) due to poor postoperative early- and long-term outcomes.

Effect of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling on Long-term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement

There have been few studies with a large number of patients on the effect of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and the prognostic impact of follow-up echocardiographic parameters after AVR. We evaluated 456 consecutive patients from a retrospective multicenter registry in Japan (J-PROVE-Retro) who underwent AVR for aortic valve diseases (predominantly aortic stenosis [AS]; 326 patients and aortic regurgitation [AR]; 130 patients). Preoperative and follow-up echocardiography at 1 year after AVR was evaluated. The primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiac death or hospitalization due to heart failure. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years in AS group and 9.7 years in AR group. The freedom rate from the primary outcome was 92% at 5 years and 79% at 10 years in AS, and 97% at 5 years, and 93% at 10 years in AR. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters, and the LV mass index decreased and LV ejection fraction increased after AVR in both AS and AR, and LV mass index was normalized in more than half of the patients. In the Cox proportional hazard model, echocardiographic parameters at 1 year after AVR were more strongly related to long-term outcomes than preoperative echocardiographic parameters. In conclusion, echocardiographic parameters at 1 year after AVR are more important as predictors of long-term outcomes than preoperative parameters in both AS and AR. More attention should be paid on early postoperative remodeling for long-term follow-up of patients after AVR.

Isolated myxoid degeneration of aortic valve: diagnostic dilemma

Myxoid degeneration of the aortic valve as a cause of acute aortic valve regurgitation in young age is uncommon. We report a 39-year-old African-American man with a history of epilepsy and hypertension who presented with a 1-month history of worsening shortness of breath. He was diagnosed with acute pulmonary oedema. Transoesophageal echocardiogram showed normal ejection fraction but severe aortic valve insufficiency with small masses on the ventricular side of the right and non-coronary cusps, small vegetations cannot be ruled out but other valves were normal. Subsequent cultures were negative for endocarditis. Myocardial positron emission tomography (PET) scan was strongly suggestive of cardiac sarcoidosis. However, this diagnosis was ruled out as well when he underwent aortic valve replacement with bioprosthetic valve as he did not want to take long-term anticoagulation. Histological examination of the aortic valve showed myxoid degeneration. The patient was doing very well 1 year after the surgery.

Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with native aortic valve regurgitation

Due to the absence of annular calcification for device anchoring, it is presumed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not suitable for the treatment of native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) resulting in very limited data and experience concerning its safety and efficacy. We sought to review published data on the safety and efficacy of TAVR in high-risk patients with NAVR. Studies including case reports, case series and original articles published between 2002 and 2016 on TAVR in patients with NAVR were identified with a systematic electronic search using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Only studies reporting data on demographic and procedural characteristics, management and follow up outcomes were analyzed. A total of 30 publications describing 182 patients were identified. Most patients (54%) were men, with a mean age of 70.1±2.6 years, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (EuroSCORE) of 21.8%±4.5% and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score of 8%±1.8% for mortality. The majority (87%) of patients had severe NAVR with no valvular calcification. TAVR was mostly performed through the femoral (58.8%) and apical (33.1%) approach. Device success, defined by VARC-2, was achieved in 86.3% of our study population. A second valve was required in 17 patients (9.3%) during the index procedure for residual aortic regurgitation or malposition. Post-procedure aortic regurgitation of grade 1 or less was present in 80 patients (81%). Pacemaker implantation was required post procedure in 17 patients (9.3%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality was 11.9% and 16.2%, respectively. TAVR is associated with favorable pacemaker implantation and 1-year mortality rates with a high 30-day mortality among selected patients with NAVR.