Pattern of basic life support ambulance use in an urban pediatric population

Analysis of the Adequacy of Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Use of Patients Who Visited Emergency Departments in Korea from 2016 to 2018: Data from the National Emergency Department Information System

Introduction

Proper ambulance use is important not only due to the patient's transport quality but also because of the need for efficient use of limited resources allotted by the system. Therefore, this study was conducted to check for overuse or underuse of the ambulance system by patients who visited the emergency department (ED).

Methods

In this study, a secondary data analysis was conducted using the existing database of the National Emergency Department Information System with all patients who visited EDs over the three-year study period from 2016 to 2018. The study subjects were classified into the following groups: (1) appropriate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) usage; (2) appropriate no EMS usage; (3) underuse; and (4) overuse groups.

Results

Of 18,298,535 patients, 11,668,581 (63.77%) were classified under the appropriate usage group, while 6,629,954 (36.23%) were classified under the inappropriate usage group. In the appropriate EMS usage group, there were 2,408,845 (13.16%) patients. In the appropriate no EMS usage group, there were 9,259,706 (50.60%) patients. As for the inappropriate usage group, there were 5,147,352 (28.13%) patients categorized under the underuse group. On the other hand, there were 1,482,602 (8.10%) patients under the overuse group.

Conclusion

There are many patients who use ambulances appropriately, but there are still many overuse and underuse. Guidelines on ambulance use are necessary for the efficient use of emergency medical resources and for the safety of patients.

Emergency Medical Services Utilization Is Associated With Community Deprivation in Children

BACKGROUND

Pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) utilization is costly and resource intensive; significant variation exists across large-scale geographies. Less is known about variation at smaller geographic levels where factors including lack of transportation, low health literacy, and decreased access to medical homes may be more relevant. Our objective was to determine whether pediatric EMS utilization varied across Hamilton County, Ohio, census tracts and whether such utilization was associated with socioeconomic deprivation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of children living in Hamilton County, Ohio, transported by EMS to the Cincinnati Children's emergency department between July 1, 2014, and July 31, 2016. Participants' addresses were assigned to census tracts and an EMS utilization rate and deprivation index were calculated for each. Pearson's correlation coefficients evaluated relationships between tract-level EMS utilization and deprivation. Tract-level deprivation was used as a predictor in patient-level evaluations of acuity.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 4,877 pediatric EMS transports from 219 of the 222 county census tracts. The county EMS utilization rate during the study period was 2.4 transports per 100 children (range 0.2-11). EMS utilization rates were positively correlated with increasing deprivation (r = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.77). Deprivation was associated with lower illness severity at triage, fewer transports resulting in resuscitation suite use, and fewer transports resulting in hospitalizations (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EMS utilization varied substantially across census tracts in Hamilton County, Ohio. A deeper understanding into why certain socioeconomically deprived areas contribute to disproportionately high rates of EMS utilization could support development of targeted interventions to improve use.

Determinants of Pediatric EMS Utilization in Children with High-Acuity Conditions

BACKGROUND

Underutilization of emergency medical services (EMS) for children with high-acuity conditions is poorly understood. Our objective was to identify differences in demographic factors and describe caregivers' knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes regarding EMS utilization for children with high-acuity conditions.

DESIGN/METHODS

This was a mixed-methods study of children with high acuity conditions, defined as requiring immediate medical or surgical intervention and intensive care admission, over a one year period. Demographic data were collected through a retrospective chart review. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews from a purposive sample of caregivers was conducted until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-four charts were reviewed; 19 caregivers were interviewed (17 in-person, 2 via telephone). The 232 (62%) children not arriving by EMS tended to be younger (1.58 years vs. 2.31 years, p = 0.02), privately insured (30% vs. 19%, p = 0.04), and lived further from the hospital (16.80 miles vs. 12.45 miles, p = 0.001). Patient gender, ethnicity, comorbidities and caregiver language were not associated with EMS underutilization. Immediate invasive medical interventions were more often required for EMS utilizers (85% vs. 60%, p < 0.001). EMS utilizers were more likely to require intubation (78% vs. 47%, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (26% vs. 2%, p < 0.001), and had shorter hospital stays (4.70 vs. 8.16 days; p-value < 0.001). Three principal themes determined EMS utilization: expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers. Three principal themes determined EMS utilization: expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers. Caretakers expected EMS would provide timely, safe transportation that expedited medical care and emotional support. Medical knowledge and prior experience with EMS influenced decision-making about arrival mode. Timeliness, cost, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, loss of autonomy, and the logistics of EMS activation and transport were the most commonly reported barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Young age, private insurance status, and greater distance from the hospital were associated with EMS underutilization. Understanding caregiver expectations, knowledge, and perceived barriers may have important implications for the use of EMS for children. These findings reveal opportunities for improved public education on EMS systems to enhance appropriate EMS utilization for children with high acuity conditions.

Challenges and Opportunities to Engaging Emergency Medical Service Providers in Substance Use Research: A Qualitative Study

Introduction Research suggests Emergency Medical Services (EMS) over-use in urban cities is partly due to substance users with limited access to medical/social services. Recent efforts to deliver brief, motivational messages to encourage these individuals to enter treatment have not considered EMS providers. Problem Little research has been done with EMS providers who serve substance-using patients. The EMS providers were interviewed about participating in a pilot program where they would be trained to screen their patients for substance abuse and encourage them to enter drug treatment.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with Baltimore City Fire Department (BCFD; Baltimore, Maryland USA) EMS providers (N=22). Topics included EMS misuse, work demands, and views on participating in the pilot program. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using grounded theory and constant-comparison.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly white (68.1%); male (68.2%); with Advanced Life Skills training (90.9%). Mean age was 37.5 years. Providers described the "frequent flyer problem" (eg, EMS over-use by a few repeat non-emergent cases). Providers expressed disappointment with local health delivery due to resource limitations and being excluded from decision making within their administration, leading to reduced team morale and burnout. Nonetheless, providers acknowledged they are well-positioned to intervene with substance-using patients because they are in direct contact and have built rapport with them. They noted patients might be most receptive to motivational messages immediately after overdose revival, which several called "hitting their bottom." Several stated that involvement with the proposed study would be facilitated by direct incorporation into EMS providers' current workflow. Many recommended that research team members accompany EMS providers while on-call to observe their day-to-day work. Barriers identified by the providers included time constraints to intervene, limited knowledge of substance abuse treatment modalities, and fearing negative repercussions from supervisors and/or patients. Despite reservations, several EMS providers expressed inclination to deliver brief motivational messages to encourage substance-using patients to consider treatment, given adequate training and skill-building.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency Medical Service providers may have many demands, including difficult case time/resource limitations. Even so, participants recognized their unique position as first responders to deliver motivational, harm-reduction messages to substance-using patients during transport. With incentivized training, implementing this program could be life- and cost-saving, improving emergency and behavioral health services. Findings will inform future efforts to connect substance users with drug treatment, potentially reducing EMS over-use in Baltimore. Maragh-Bass AC , Fields JC , McWilliams J , Knowlton AR . Challenges and opportunities to engaging Emergency Medical Service providers in substance use research: a qualitative study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(2):148-155.

Pediatric Use of Emergency Medical Services: The Role of Chronic Illnesses and Behavioral Health Problems

OBJECTIVE

The increasing use of prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) and its contribution to rising emergency department use and healthcare costs point to the need for better understanding factors associated with EMS use to inform preventive interventions. Understanding patient factors associated with pediatric use of EMS will inform pediatric-specific intervention. We examined pediatric patient demographic and health factors associated with one-time and repeat use of EMS.

METHODS

We reviewed data from Baltimore City Fire Department EMS patient records over a 23-month period (2008-10) for patients under 21 years of age (n = 24,760). Repeat use was defined as involvement in more than one EMS incident during the observation period. Analyses compared demographics of EMS users to the city population and demographics and health problems of repeat and one-time EMS users. Health comparisons were conducted at the patient and incident levels of analysis.

RESULTS

Repeat users (n = 1,931) accounted for 9.0% of pediatric users and 20.8% of pediatric incidents, and were over-represented among the 18-20 year age group and among females. While trauma accounted for approximately one-quarter of incidents, repeat versus one-time users had a lower proportion of trauma-related incidents (7.2% vs. 26.7%) and higher proportion of medical-related incidents (92.6% vs. 71.4%), including higher proportions of incidents related to asthma, seizures, and obstetric/gynecologic issues. In patient-level analysis, based on provider or patient reports, greater proportions of repeat compared to one-time users had asthma, behavioral health problems (mental, conduct and substance use problems), seizures, and diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic somatic conditions and behavioral health problems appear to contribute to a large proportion of the repeat pediatric use of this EMS system. Interventions may be needed to engage repeat users in primary care and behavioral health services, to train EMS providers on the recognition and management of behavioral health emergencies, and to improve family care and self-management of pediatric asthma and other chronic conditions.

Identifying Frequent Users of an Urban Emergency Medical Service Using Descriptive Statistics and Regression Analyses

This retrospective cohort study provides a descriptive analysis of a population that frequently uses an urban emergency medical service (EMS) and identifies factors that contribute to use among all frequent users. For purposes of this study we divided frequent users into the following groups: low- frequent users (4 EMS transports in 2012), medium-frequent users (5 to 6 EMS transports in 2012), high-frequent users (7 to 10 EMS transports in 2012) and super-frequent users (11 or more EMS transports in 2012). Overall, we identified 539 individuals as frequent users. For all groups of EMS frequent users (i.e. low, medium, high and super) one or more hospital admissions, receiving a referral for follow-up care upon discharge, and having no insurance were found to be statistically significant with frequent EMS use (P<0.05). Within the diagnostic categories, 41.61% of super-frequent users had a diagnosis of "primarily substance abuse/misuse" and among low-frequent users a majority, 53.33%, were identified as having a "reoccurring (medical) diagnosis." Lastly, relative risk ratios for the highest group of users, super-frequent users, were 3.34 (95% CI [1.90-5.87]) for obtaining at least one referral for follow-up care, 13.67 (95% CI [5.60-33.34]) for having four or more hospital admissions and 5.95 (95% CI [1.80-19.63]) for having a diagnoses of primarily substance abuse/misuse. Findings from this study demonstrate that among low- and medium-frequent users a majority of patients are using EMS for reoccurring medical conditions. This could potentially be avoided with better care management. In addition, this study adds to the current literature that illustrates a strong correlation between substance abuse/misuse and high/super-frequent EMS use. For the subgroup analysis among individuals 65 years of age and older, we did not find any of the independent variables included in our model to be statistically significant with frequent EMS use.

Emergency medical services system utilization over the last 10 years: what predicts transport of children?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of pediatric ambulance transport and evaluate changes in utilization over a 10-year period.

METHODS

The National Health Ambulatory Medical Care Survey emergency department (ED) data for visits by children aged younger than 19 years from 2000 to 2009 were analyzed using logistic regression. Age, ethnicity, race, sex, triage level, time of arrival, injury/poisoning, insurance, disposition, critical patient status, metropolitan statistical area (MSA), region, and hospital type were used to predict the mode of arrival (ambulance or nonambulance). Significant variables were evaluated for trends over time.

RESULTS

Representing 209 million ED visits, 60,761 records were analyzed. Ambulance transport was more likely among children who were aged 12 to 18 years (P < 0.05), black (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.38), evaluated for an injury/poisoning (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 2.75-3.34), publicly insured (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31), living in an MSA (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.34-2.23), living in the northeast (P < 0.05), and overnight arrivals (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.7). They were more likely to have an urgency of less than 15 minutes (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 3.56-5.59), require admission (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.33-3.41), and considered critical (OR, 5.15; 95% CI, 3.43-7.73). There was no significant change in ambulance utilization in children; however, about half of critical patients and over 80% of those with a high triage level did not arrive by ambulance.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulance transport to the ED is used more often by teens, blacks, publicly insured, overnight arrivals, and those living in an MSA or the northeast. It is concerning that many children triaged with a high urgency or requiring critical care did not arrive by ambulance.

Swedish emergency medical services' identification of potential candidates for primary healthcare: Retrospective patient record study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patients who called the emergency medical services (EMS) for primary healthcare (PHC) problems.

DESIGN

A retrospective and exploratory patient record study from an EMS perspective, comparing two groups: those who were potential candidates for PHC and those who were not. All data were gathered from EMS and hospital records.

SETTINGS

The study was completed at the EMS and five hospital areas in the western region of Sweden.

SUBJECTS

The patients (n = 3001) who called the EMS in 2011. Data were missing for 10%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequency and the clinical characteristics of the patients who called the EMS and were actually potential candidates for PHC.

RESULTS

Of a total of 2703 patients, a group of 426 (16%) were assessed as potential candidates for PHC and could thus be treated at a level of care other than the emergency department. Patients who were classified as suitable for PHC were found at all priority levels and within all symptom groups, but were younger and healthier than the other group.

CONCLUSION

Numerous patients seeking help from the EMS do not end up at the most appropriate level in the healthcare system.

IMPLICATIONS

In the EMS, guidelines are needed to enable pre-hospital emergency nurses to assess and triage patients to the most appropriate level of healthcare. Key points Patients calling the emergency medical services do not always end up at an appropriate level of healthcare. In total, 16% of patients were identified by the Swedish emergency medical services as potential candidates for primary healthcare. These patients were younger and healthier than those needing care at the emergency department. They were found at all priority levels and within all symptom groups.

Withholding or termination of resuscitation in pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest

This multiorganizational literature review was undertaken to provide an evidence base for determining whether or not recommendations for out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation could be made for children who are victims of traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. Although there is increasing acceptance of out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation for adult traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest when there is no expectation of a good outcome, children are routinely excluded from state termination-of-resuscitation protocols. The decision to withhold resuscitative efforts in a child under specific circumstances (decapitation or dependent lividity, rigor mortis, etc) is reasonable. If there is any doubt as to the circumstances or timing of the traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest, under the current status of limiting termination of resuscitation in the field to persons older than 18 years in most states, resuscitation should be initiated and continued until arrival to the appropriate facility. If the patient has arrested, resuscitation has already exceeded 30 minutes, and the nearest facility is more than 30 minutes away, involvement of parents and family of these children in the decision-making process with assistance and guidance from medical professionals should be considered as part of an emphasis on family-centered care, because the evidence suggests that either death or a poor outcome is inevitable.

Withholding or termination of resuscitation in pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest

This multiorganizational literature review was undertaken to provide an evidence base for determining whether recommendations for out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation could be made for children who are victims of traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest. Although there is increasing acceptance of out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation for adult traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest when there is no expectation of a good outcome, children are routinely excluded from state termination-of-resuscitation protocols. The decision to withhold resuscitative efforts in a child under specific circumstances (decapitation or dependent lividity, rigor mortis, etc) is reasonable. If there is any doubt as to the circumstances or timing of the traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest, under the current status of limiting termination of resuscitation in the field to persons older than 18 years in most states, resuscitation should be initiated and continued until arrival to the appropriate facility. If the patient has arrested, resuscitation has already exceeded 30 minutes, and the nearest facility is more than 30 minutes away, involvement of parents and family of these children in the decision-making process with assistance and guidance from medical professionals should be considered as part of an emphasis on family-centered care because the evidence suggests that either death or a poor outcome is inevitable.

"Inappropriate" pediatric emergency medical services utilization redefined

OBJECTIVES

Previous reports on emergency medical services (EMS) transportation of pediatric patients have demonstrated a high rate of overutilization. However, there is also a concern that pediatric patients may underutilize EMS for emergencies that might benefit from EMS. This article compares EMS utilization rate between adult and pediatric patients for high-acuity patients and for the most common reasons for transport.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to compare hospital arrival by EMS to walk-in arrivals. Primary variables were age category, mode of arrival, immediacy to be seen (triage category), reason for visit, and disposition.

RESULTS

There were 253,898 records, weighted to represent 914.4 million emergency department visits, included. Emergency medical services mode of arrival was significantly higher for adult patients at 19.1% as compared with pediatric patients at 6.5% (odds ratio, 3.38). For the subgroup of patients requiring critical care interventions, adult patient arrival by EMS was 87.3% as compared with pediatric patients at 66.3% (odds ratio, 3.50). When considering the top 20 most common medical complaints in which pediatric patients used EMS transport, adult patients utilized EMS more frequently in 85% (17/20) of those complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with adults, pediatric patients are less likely to utilize EMS for transport to the hospital for both routine and emergent complaints. The definition of inappropriate utilization of EMS for pediatric transport, which has largely focused on inappropriate overutilization, should also incorporate the potential of underutilization for critical patients.

Management and outcomes of pediatric patients transported by emergency medical services in a Canadian prehospital system

OBJECTIVES

There is uncertainty around the types of interventions that are provided by emergency medical services (EMS) to children during prehospital transport. We describe the patient characteristics, events, interventions provided and outcomes of a cohort of children transported by EMS.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted in a city of 750 000 people with a 2-tiered EMS system. All children <16 years of age who were attended by EMS during a 6-month period were enrolled. Data were extracted from ambulance call reports and hospital charts, and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

During the study period there were 1377 pediatric EMS calls. Mean age was 8.2 years (standard deviation 5.4), and the most Common diagnoses were trauma (44.9%), seizure (11.8%) and respiratory distress (8.8%). The ambulance return code was Urgent in 7%, Prompt in 57%, Deferrable in 8% and Not Transported in 28%. Fifty-six percent received either an Advanced Life Support or Basic Life Support prehospital intervention. Common procedures included cardiac monitoring (20.0%), oxygen administration (19.8%), blood glucose monitoring (16.3%), spine board (12.2%), limb immobilization (11.1%) and cervical collar (10.0%). Uncommon procedures included administering medications intravenously (IV) (1.4%), bag-valve-mask ventilation (0.3%) and endotracheal intubation (0.1%). Seventy-eight percent of attempted IV lines were successful. Only 9.0% of EMS-transported children were admitted to hospital, and 2.2% were admitted to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study of Canadian pediatric prehospital interventions shows a high rate of non-transport, and a low rate of Urgent transports and hospital admissions for children. Very few children receive prehospital airway management, ventilation or IV medications; consequently EMS personnel have little opportunity to maintain these pediatric skills in the field.

Medically unnecessary emergency medical services (EMS) transports among children ages 0 to 17 years

OBJECTIVES

Estimate the prevalence of medically unnecessary Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transports among children.

METHODS

We linked EMS and emergency department (ED) billing records for all EMS-to-hospital transports of children originating in three counties in South Carolina between January 1, 2001 and March 31, 2003. EMS responses resulting in no transport, transports to destinations other than the ED, or multiple trips for the same child in a single day could not be linked to ED data and were excluded. Medically unnecessary transports were identified with an algorithm using pre-hospital impressions, ED diagnoses and ED procedures. After exclusions, 5,693 transports of children between 0 and 17 years were available for study.

RESULTS

Sixteen percent (16.4%) of all transports were medically unnecessary. Among children through age 12, upper respiratory and viral problems were the most common diagnoses associated with medically unnecessary transports; among older children, behavioral problems such as conduct disturbance or drug abuse were common. In multivariable analysis, the odds of an unnecessary transport were higher among younger children, non-white children, rural children, and children insured by Medicaid.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of EMS transports which may be medically unnecessary is relatively modest compared to previous studies. However, many questions remain for future research. Further investigation should include examination of primary care availability and occurrence of unnecessary EMS use, existence of race-based disparities, and transports involving conduct disturbance and other behavioral conditions among children.

Economic value of out-of-hospital emergency care: a structured literature review

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The evaluation of the impact of out-of-hospital emergency care is a relatively new research focus. As such, there is a compelling need to determine how finite health care resources should be used in this setting. The objective of this study is to conduct a structured review of published economic evaluations of out-of-hospital emergency care to assess its economic value.

METHODS

A structured literature search and structured review of articles pertaining to the economic value of out-of-hospital care was performed. The bibliographic database MEDLINE was searched for pertinent English-language articles published between 1966 and 2003. The search used the medical subject headings "emergency medical services" and "emergency medical technician" and was limited to the subheading "economics" and crossed with the medical subject heading "economics." The titles generated by this search were systematically reviewed and limited by topic. Abstracts from the identified titles were reviewed to select a final set of pertinent articles. These articles were further limited based on explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Authors used a previously published structured evaluation tool to review the final set of identified articles for quality and content.

RESULTS

The initial MEDLINE search identified 3,533 citations. From this set, 535 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed. From the abstract review, 46 articles were identified, along with an additional 14 from searching the secondary references. Of these 60 articles, 32 met the review inclusion criteria and were subjected to a full structured review. These studies predominantly addressed the cost of cardiac arrest (n=13, 41%), major trauma (n=8, 25%), and emergency medical services treatment in general (n=8, 25%). Only 14 studies considered the costs and consequences of competing alternatives. Of these, 2 were cost-benefit and 12 were cost-effectiveness evaluations. Two of the 14 studies met all 10 criteria for high-quality economic evaluation, whereas 2 others met none.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of out-of-hospital care literature that addresses cost and economic value. The extant literature is limited in scope, poor in quality, and evaluates small subsets of out-of-hospital emergency care costs. Favorable cost-effectiveness has not been firmly established for most aspects of out-of-hospital emergency care.

Improving emergency medical services for children with special health care needs: does training make a difference?

This study evaluated the impact of a paramedic training program on emergency medical services (EMS) responses for children with special health care needs. EMS responses for children with a congenital or acquired condition or a chronic physical or mental illness, were reviewed. Responses, related to the child's special health care need, involving paramedics who had completed our training program were compared with responses with paramedics not participating in the training. There was significantly more advanced life support treatment for responses with paramedics completing the training program compared with other responses. However, there was no significant difference in transport to a hospital or in-hospital admission between these 2 groups. This finding suggests that existing EMS protocols may play a more important role in emergency treatment and transport of children with special health care needs than specialized training of already certified paramedics.

Prehospital emergency care for children at school and nonschool locations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether school-based emergency medical services (EMS) incidents are different from nonschool-based EMS incidents for school-aged children.

METHODS

We examined South Dakota EMS incident reports involving children ages 5 to 18 years old from 1994 through 1996 (n = 12603). Patient characteristics, dispatch reason, primary medical complaint, injury type, contributing factor of injury, and performed interventions were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 140455 total EMS incident reports, of which 12603 (9.0%) were for school-aged children. EMS dispatches to a school represented 755 (6.0%) of all EMS incidents for school-aged children. The number of school-based EMS incidents was highest at the beginning of the school year, whereas the number of nonschool-based EMS incidents was highest during the summer months. School-based EMS incidents peaked at noon, whereas nonschool-based EMS incidents peaked after school. For both locations, the average age of the patient was 14 years old. The dispatch reason for school-based EMS incidents differed from those for nonschool-based EMS incidents. The top three school-based EMS dispatch reasons were falls (36.2%), other trauma (27.0%), and medical illness (24.5%). Motor vehicle crashes (30.8%), medical illness (26.2%), and other trauma (11.4%) were the leading nonschool-based EMS dispatch reasons. Injuries accounted for a significantly greater proportion of school-based than nonschool-based EMS incidents (70.7% vs 62.6%). Excluding pain, the most frequent type of injury was a fracture or dislocation in school-based EMS incidents and open soft-tissue injury in nonschool-based EMS incidents. A total of 11 students sustained an injury resulting in paralysis. The body region that was most commonly injured was a lower extremity (23%) in school-based incidents, whereas the head was the most commonly injured body region in nonschool-based incidents (20%). Sports were the largest contributing factor in school-based incidents, whereas alcohol/drug use was the largest contributing factor in nonschool-based EMS incidents among school-aged children. A medical illness was the primary complaint for 206 (27.3%) of the school-based incidents and 3599 (30.4%) of the nonschool-based incidents. The chief medical complaints were breathing difficulty (18.4%), seizure (16%), and other illness (12.3%) for school-based EMS incidents. Other illness (20.0%), breathing difficulty (13.7%), and abdominal pain (12.0%) were the chief complaints for nonschool-based EMS incidents. Treatment was rendered by the EMS provider in 11 753 (93.3%) of the incidents. Frequency of EMS intervention was the same for school-based incidents and nonschool-based incidents. Transportation to a medical facility was more frequent in school-based incidents than nonschool-based incidents.

CONCLUSION

Compared with nonschool-based EMS incidents, school-based EMS incidents are more often attributable to injury, more often related to a sports activity, and more often result in transport to a medical facility. Understanding the characteristics of school emergencies resulting in an EMS dispatch may help emergency medical providers be better prepared for school-based incidents. School personnel may benefit from increased knowledge about the EMS system and EMS programs. In addition, EMS incident data may provide useful information about school-based injuries and may provide a means for injury surveillance.

Medically unnecessary pediatric ambulance transports: a medical taxi service?

OBJECTIVE

To characterize ambulance utilization in a pediatric population and pediatric emergency physicians' judgement of the medical need for ambulance transport.

METHODS

A convenience sample of ambulance transports were studied prospectively during a 5-week period. Exclusion criteria included transfer from another medical facility, study physician not available, need for immediate resuscitation, or trauma team activation. A questionnaire completed by the physician assessed medical need for the ambulance based on chief complaint, general appearance, vital signs, and ambulance run sheet information. A separate questionnaire was administered to the parents regarding reasons for ambulance use and other available means of transportation. Caregivers were contacted by telephone 2-3 days later to determine the mode of transportation home and the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Of 172 eligible patients, 92 (53%) were enrolled. Most (61%; 56/92) transports were considered medically unnecessary. Interestingly, 40% (37/92) of the subjects had no other means of transportation; 86% (32/37) of ambulance transports for this group were judged medically unnecessary. Overall, 86% (79/92) of families had not called their physician. There was no association between having spoken with the physician and medical need for an ambulance. Many (82%; 46/56) Medicaid transports were judged medically unnecessary Overall, follow-up was achieved for 91% (85/92) of the patients. No patient for whom transport was medically unnecessary had a repeat ED visit for the same complaint or required admission. Most patients (74%; 68/92) returned home without any assistance. Among the medically unnecessary transports, 52% (32/60) of the caregivers cited no other means of transportation, yet 34% (11/32) of these patients returned home by private car.

CONCLUSIONS

Most pediatric ambulance transports in this sample, which excluded patients requiring immediate resuscitation or trauma team care, were judged to be medically unnecessary. Caregivers often use an ambulance as a convenience or as the only means of transportation. An alternate, less resource-intensive transportation system may be more appropriate for this population.