The effects of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) on the release of growth hormone and growth performance in swine

Effects of GHRP-2 and Cysteamine Administration on Growth Performance, Somatotropic Axis Hormone and Muscle Protein Deposition in Yaks (Bos grunniens) with Growth Retardation

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and cysteamine (CS) administration on growth performance in yaks with growth retardation and try to elucidate its regulatory mechanisms. Trial 1, thirty-six 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks (body weight 38–83.2 kg) were randomly chosen for body weight and jugular blood samples collection. The relationship between body weight and serum GHRH (P < 0.05, R = 0.45), GH (P < 0.05, R = 0.47), IGF-1 (P < 0.05, R = 0.62) was significantly correlated in yaks colonies with lighter body weights. Trial 2, fifteen 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with growth retardation (average body weight 54.8 ± 8.24 kg) were randomly selected and assigned to negative control group (NG), GHRP-2 injection group (GG) and cysteamine feeding group (CG), with 5 yaks per group. Another five 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with normal growth performance (average body weight 75.3 ± 2.43 kg) were selected as positive control group (PG). The average daily gain (ADG) of the GG and CG were significantly higher than those in the PG and NG (P < 0.05). Both GHRP-2 and CS administration significantly enhanced the myofiber diameter and area of skeletal muscle (P<0.05). GHRP-2 significantly enhanced the serum GH and IGF-1 levels (P < 0.05), and up-regulated GHR, IGF-1 and IGF-1R mRNA expression in the liver and skeletal muscle (P < 0.05), enhanced the mRNA expression of PI₃K, AKt and mTOR in the skeletal muscle (P<0.05). CS significantly reduced the serum SS levels and the hypothalamus SS mRNA expression (P < 0.05), and enhanced GHR and IGF-1 mRNA expression in the liver (P < 0.05), decreased the mRNA expression of muscle atrophy F-box (Atrogin-1) and muscle ring finger 1 (MuRF1) mRNA (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Growth retardation in yaks was primarily due to somatotropic axis hormones secretion deficiency. Both GHRP-2 and CS administration can accelerate growth performance and GH, IGF-1 secretion in yaks with growth retardation. GHRP-2 enhanced muscle protein deposition mainly by up-regulated the protein synthesis pathways, whereas CS worked mainly by down-regulated the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

A comparison of the growth responses following intramuscular GHRH plasmid administration versus daily growth hormone injections in young pigs

The efficacy of daily porcine growth hormone (GH) injections versus plasmid-driven porcine GH-releasing hormone (pGHRH) production to promote growth was assessed. Ten-day-old piglets were injected intramuscularly with 0.1, 1, or 3 mg pGHRH, or a control plasmid followed by electroporation. Plasmid constructs were driven by a synthetic muscle-specific promoter. A fifth group received daily injections of GH [0.15 mg/(kg.day)]. Control and pGHRH-treated pigs were pair-fed to GH-treated pigs. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Weight gains of GH- and pGHRH-treated pigs were greater than of controls (P < 0.001) due to greater lean mass accretion; fat accretion was similar across all treatments. Weight gain of pGHRH- and GH-treated pigs was similar for 6 weeks, but over the final 10 days, only pigs administered the highest plasmid dose maintained higher growth rates. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels were two- to threefold higher in GH- and pGHRH-treated pigs than in controls after 4 weeks (P = 0.05), but subsequently decreased to control levels in the pGHRH-treated group. Organ weights were greater in GH- than pGHRH-treated and control piglets (P < 0.02). These results demonstrate that pGHRH transfer is effective for promoting growth and avoids the need for the frequent injections necessitated with peptide hormone use.

Endocrine and orexigenic actions of growth hormone secretagogues in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

The effects of growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) on the teleost somatotropic axis are poorly understood, particularly with respect to insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs). To assess the endocrine and orexigenic responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to GHS treatment, animals were injected with human GHRH(1-29)-amide, KP-102 or rat ghrelin at 0, 1 or 10 pmol/g body mass. Feed intake was tested at 2 and 5 h post-injection and plasma levels of growth hormone (GH), IGF-I and the IGFBPs were determined at 3, 6 and 12 h post-injection. Feed intake was significantly elevated by all of the GHSs tested at both post-injection time points. All GHSs elevated plasma GH levels in a time-dependent manner. Plasma IGF-I levels were elevated by all GHSs at 3 h post-injection, whereas those animals treated with KP-102 and ghrelin exhibited depressions at 6 h. Four IGFBPs were identified in the plasma by western blotting. Levels of the 20 kDa IGFBP decreased over the sampling time. Levels of the 32 kDa IGFBP were significantly depressed by all GHSs tested. Levels of the 42 kDa IGFBP were significantly elevated by all GHSs tested. Plasma levels of the 50 kDa IGFBP was decreased in some treatment groups at 3 h, but elevated by 6 h in the ghrelin-treated groups and elevated in all treatment groups by 12 h post-injection. The endocrine and orexigenic responses demonstrate that GHSs influence the teleost neuroendocrine system beyond short-term actions (<3 h post-injection) on GH release and the responses of the IGFBPs to GHS treatment support this notion and clarify their identification as functional homologues to mammalian IGFBPs.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of a PEGylated analogue of human growth hormone releasing factor in rats and pigs

The aim of this study was to assess the in vivo efficacy of monoPEGylated GRF(1-29)NH(2) having one PEG(5000) chains attached to either lysine 12 or 21 as compared to the GRF(1-29)NH(2) in rats and pigs. This analogue termed GRF-1PEG(5000) was tested after a single intravenous administration in rats and after a single intravenous or subcutaneous injection in pigs. After 1 h administration, GH concentrations returned to values close to controls in the group of rats injected with GRF(1-29)NH(2). In animals injected with the same dose of GRF-1PEG(5000), the AUC values corresponding to the whole period 0.5-48 h and particularly to the 0.5-8 h period were higher than in the placebo or in the GRF(1-29)NH(2) groups. Interestingly, two additional peaks were observed at about 6 and 8 h following administration. An increase in the response of the endogenous GH peaks was also observed in pigs administered GRF-1PEG(5000) by intravenous route. When GRF-1PEG(5000) was administered subcutaneously to pigs, a significant increase, as compared to placebo and GRF(1-29)NH(2,) in both GH and IGF-I levels was observed. This new analogue might find therapeutic application in paediatric growth hormone deficiency or in aging.

Effects of the administration of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) orally by gavage and in feed on growth hormone release in swine

The experiments were conducted to determine the effects of the administration of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2, also named KP102), both orally by gavage and in feed, on the release of growth hormone (GH) in swine and to investigate whether attenuation of the GH response occurs after short-term treatment with the peptide in feed. In the first experiment, saline or GHRP-2 at doses of 1, 4.5 and 9 mg/kg body weight (BW) was dissolved in 15 ml saline and administered orally as a bolus by gavage to cross-bred castrated male swine (n = 6). Orally administered GHRP-2 stimulated dose-related increases in peak concentrations of GH, with a return to basal by 120 min. After administering GHRP-2 orally, peak concentrations of GH and areas under the GH response curves (GH AUCs) for 180 min were higher (P < 0.05) than those in saline controls. In Experiment 2, GHRP-2 at doses of 0 (served as control), 1, 4.5 and 9 mg/kg BW was mixed in 150 g of feed and offered to cross-bred castrated male swine (n = 6) at 0900 hr and 1700 hr daily for a 3-d period. Administration of 1 mg/kg BW GHRP-2 to swine in feed failed to stimulate the release of GH, but GHRP-2 at doses of 4.5 and 9 mg/kg BW significantly (P < 0.05) increased plasma concentrations of GH after initial and final treatments at 0900 hr on Days 1 and 3 of treatment, respectively. Peak concentrations of GH and GH AUCs for 180 min after the initial and final treatments in the 4.5 and 9 mg/kg BW GHRP-2-treated swine were higher (P < 0.05) than those in controls. After 3 d of treatment with GHRP-2 in feed at doses of 4.5 and 9 mg/kg BW, GH responses to the peptide were maintained. The results of the present study indicate that the administration of GHRP-2 orally by gavage and in feed stimulates the release of GH in swine, and that the GH-releasing effect of the peptide does not become desensitized after short-term administration in feed.

Plasma growth hormone (GH) responses after administration of the peptidergic GH secretagogue KP102 into the oral cavity, rumen, abomasum and duodenum in adult goats

The study was performed to determine whether orally administered KP102 (also known as GHRP-2) stimulates GH release in adult goats, and how the orally administered KP102 passes through the digestive tract and stimulates GH release in ruminant animals. Five mg/kg body weight (BW) of KP102 dissolved in 9 ml of saline were administered into the oral cavity, rumen, omasum and duodenum of adult goats, and GH release after administration of KP102 was examined. The GH levels were significantly elevated at 20 min after administration of KP102 into the oral cavity, and plasma concentrations of GH remained significantly elevated until 60 min (P < 0.05). The GH levels after administration of KP102 into the abomasum were variable. However, the GH level tended to increase within 30 min after administration, and were significantly higher than those of controls after 120 to 150 min (P < 0.05). The GH levels after administration of KP102 into the duodenum were significantly elevated at 40 min after administration, and plasma concentrations of GH remained significantly elevated until 140 min (P < 0.05). The administration of KP102 into the rumen failed to stimulate GH release. The GH response curves (AUC) produced after administration of KP102 into the abomasum or duodenum were 2.2-fold greater than those for after administration into the oral cavity (P < 0.05). The oral administration of 5 mg/kg BW of KP102 in the powder state, not dissolved in 9 ml of saline, failed to stimulate GH release. These results suggested that orally administered KP102 dissolved in saline transiently stimulates GH release in adult goats, and this phenomenon might be due to small amounts of the peptides entering directly into the abomasum with liquid bypassing the rumen.