Cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing endoluminal graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institution experience with 365 patients

Peripheral artery disease is associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

We investigated the effects of coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) on clinical outcomes of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a total of 475 patients with AAA treated with EVAR at a single center. Patients were divided into three groups: group A (n = 166), patients without CAD or PAD; group B (n = 196), patients with CAD but without PAD; and group C (n = 113), patients with PAD regardless of CAD. The primary endpoint was the accumulated rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CAD and PAD in patients with AAA was 55.8 and 23.8%, respectively. Patients were followed for 40.2 ± 35.3 months. Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups except for current smoking (A, 27.4%; B, 20.8%; C, 50.5%; p = 0.001). Three years after EVAR, the incidences of MACCE (A, 5.6%; B, 9.5%; C, 16.7%; p = 0.021) and stroke (A, 0%; B, 2.2%; C, 5.2%; p = 0.025) were highest in group C. All-cause death and aneurysm death did not differ among the groups. PAD [hazard ratio (HR) 2.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-6.29, p = 0.008] and previous stroke (HR 4.39, 95% CI 1.94-9.93, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

PAD was an independent risk factor of increased MACCE and stroke for patients with AAA undergoing EVAR. More intensive secondary prevention may be needed to reduce adverse cardiovascular events in AAA patients with PAD.

Trends in hospital treatments for peripheral arterial disease in the United States and association between payer status and quality of care/outcomes, 2007-2011

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to identify the temporal trends of presenting diagnoses and vascular procedures performed for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) along with the rates of procedures and in-hospital outcomes by payer status.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or lack of insurance receive poorer quality of care leading to worse outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 196,461,055 discharge records to identify all hospitalized patients with PAD records (n=1,687,724) from January 2007 through December 2011 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.

RESULTS

The annual frequency of vascular procedures remained unchanged during the study period. Patients with Medicaid were more likely to present with gangrenes, whereas patients with Medicare were more likely to present with ulcers. After adjustment, patients with Medicare and Medicaid were more likely to undergo amputations when compared with private insurance/HMO (OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.10-1.16 and OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.20-1.29, respectively). Patients with both Medicare and Medicaid were less likely to undergo bypass surgery (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.81-0.84 and OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.85-0.90, respectively), but more likely to undergo endovascular procedures (OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.17-1.20 and OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.01-1.06, respectively). Medicare and Medicaid status versus private insurance/HMO was associated with worse adjusted odds of in-hospital outcomes, including mortality after amputations, endovascular procedures, and bypass surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, patients with Medicare and Medicaid had more comorbid conditions at baseline when compared with private insurance/HMO cohorts, were more likely to present with advanced stages of PAD, undergo amputations, and develop in-hospital complications. These data unveil a critical gap and an opportunity for quality improvement in the elderly and those with poor socioeconomic status.

Considerations for patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair has taken over open surgery as the primary strategy for treatment of patients with abdominal and thoracic aneurysms. The minimally invasive nature of these techniques requires alterations in preoperative workup, intraoperative management, and familiarity with unique complications that can occur. Familiarity from the anesthetic standpoint of endovascular techniques, including treatment of patients with fenestrated, chimney, snorkel, and periscope grafts, is necessary for the contemporary cardiac anesthesiologist.

A new revised cardiac risk index incorporating fragmented QRS complex as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a new Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) that includes consideration of QRS fragmentation (fQRS) as a predictor of cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery. Four hundred sixty-seven consecutive patients admitted for noncardiac vascular surgery were studied. Patients were allocated to RCRI 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 groups according to the sum of diabetes, renal insufficiency, and histories of ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and cerebrovascular disease. They were then reallocated to fragmented RCRI (fRCRI) 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 groups after including a score of 1 or 0 corresponding to the presence or absence of fQRS. A major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and percutaneous coronary intervention before noncardiac vascular surgery. During index hospitalization, MACE developed in 38 patients (8.1%). fQRS was present in 169 (36.2%), and it was significantly greater in patients with MACE than in those without MACE (63.2% vs 34.3%, p <0.001). The proportions of RCRI 0, 1, 2, and ≥3 were 46.9% (n = 219), 35.3% (n = 165), 12.4% (n = 58), and 5.4% (n = 25), respectively. When fRCRI data were included, 28 patients (48.3%) in RCRI 2 were reclassified as fRCRI ≥3. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, fRCRI (odds ratio 1.529, 95% confidence interval 1.035 to 2.258, p = 0.033) and a left ventricular ejection fraction <50% independently predicted in-hospital MACE. In conclusion, fRCRI is an independent predictor of in-hospital MACE in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery.

Revised Cardiac Risk Index (Lee) and perioperative cardiac events as predictors of long-term mortality in patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (Lee) is useful for stratification of patients by risk of both perioperative cardiac morbidity and long-term all-cause mortality in the setting of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

DESIGN

This study was designed as a retrospective review.

SETTING

It was conducted at a single academic medical institution.

PARTICIPANTS

The analysis included 225 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms admitted to the authors' institution from 1999 to 2006.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were collected from medical records, office charts, and physician quality-assurance databases. There were no in-hospital cardiac deaths. The major adverse cardiac event rate in the perioperative period was 6.2%. Long-term all-cause mortality was 23%. Univariate analysis showed that a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (likelihood ratio [LR] = 8.7, p = 0.023), history of congestive heart failure (LR = 4, p = 0.042), and a Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) > or =3 (LR = 8.6, p = 0.004) were significant predictors for perioperative major adverse cardiac events. A history of CAD (LR = 10.7, p = 0.002), echocardiographic evidence of myocardial infarction (LR = 8.5, p = 0.006), exercise tolerance of only 1 block (LR = 8.4, p = 0.005), RCRI > or =3 (LR = 5.6, p = 0.022), and perioperative cardiac events (LR = 15.9, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with long-term all-cause mortality. Perioperative cardiac events remained highly significant in predicting long-term mortality within the RCRI > or =3 subgroup (LR = 6.1, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm that long-term mortality remains high after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The Lee index may be a useful tool for stratification of high-risk patients from both a short- and long-term perspective in the setting of endoluminal graft repair.

National outcomes for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison of open versus endovascular repairs

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) has been shown to acutely decrease procedural mortality compared to open aortic repair (OAR). However, little is known about the effect of choice of procedure; EVAR vs OAR, or the impact of physician and institution volume on long-term survival and outcome.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized with rAAA who underwent either OAR or EVAR, were derived from the Medicare inpatient dataset (1995-2004) using ICD9 codes. We evaluated long-term survival after OAR and EVAR in the entire fee-for-service Medicare population, and then in patients matched by propensity score to create two similar cohorts for comparison with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Annual surgeon and hospital volumes of EVAR (elective and ruptured), OAR (elective and ruptured), and rAAA (EVAR and OAR) were divided into quintiles to determine if increasing volumes correlate with decreasing mortality. Predictors of survival were determined by Cox modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 43,033 Medicare beneficiaries had rAAA repair: 41,969 had OAR and 1,064 had EVAR. The proportions of patients with diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal disease, hyperlipidemia, and cancer were statistically higher in the EVAR than in the OAR group, whereas lower extremity vascular disease was higher in the OAR group. The initial evaluation of EVAR vs OAR, prior to propensity matching, showed no statistical advantage in EVAR-survival after 90 days. The survival analysis of patients matched by propensity score showed a benefit of EVAR over OAR that persisted throughout the 4 years of follow-up (P = .0042). Perioperative and long-term survival after rAAA repair correlated with increasing annual surgeon and hospital volume in OAR and EVAR and also with rAAA experience. EVAR repair had a protective effect (HR = 0.857, P = .0061) on long-term survival controlling for comorbidities, demographics, and hospital and surgeon volume.

CONCLUSION

When EVAR and OAR patients are compared using a reliable statistical technique such as propensity analysis, the perioperative survival advantage of rAAA repaired endovascularly is maintained over the long term. Institutional experience with rAAA is critical for survival after either OAR or EVAR.

Insurance status predicts access to care and outcomes of vascular disease

OBJECTIVE

To determine if insurance status predicts severity of vascular disease at the time of treatment or outcomes following intervention.

METHODS

Hospital discharge databases from Florida and New York from 2000-2005 were analyzed for lower extremity revascularization (LER, n = 73,532), carotid revascularization (CR, n = 116,578), or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA, n = 35,593), using ICD-9 codes for diagnosis and procedure. The indications for intervention as well as the post-operative outcomes were examined assigning insurance status as the independent variable. Patients covered under a variety of commercial insurers, as well as Medicare, were compared to those who either had no insurance or were covered by Medicaid.

RESULTS

Patients without insurance or with Medicaid were at significantly greater risk of presenting with a ruptured AAA compared to insured (non-Medicaid) patients; while insurance status did not seem to impact post-operative mortality rates for elective and ruptured AAA repair. The uninsured or Medicaid recipients presented with symptomatic carotid disease nearly twice as often as the insured, but stroke rates after CR did not differ significantly based on insurance status. Patients with Medicaid or without insurance were more likely to present with limb threatening ischemia than claudication. In contrast to AAA repair and CR, the outcomes of LER were worse in the uninsured and Medicaid beneficiaries who had higher rates of post-revascularization amputation compared to the insured (non-Medicaid) group.

CONCLUSION

Insurance status predicts disease severity at the time of treatment, but once treated, the outcomes are similar among insurance categories, with the exception of lower extremity revascularization. This data suggests inferior access to preventative vascular care in the Medicaid and the uninsured populations.

Preoperative Nutritional Status Predicts the Severity of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Following Major Vascular Surgery

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the relationship between pre-operative nutritional status and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis following major vascular surgery.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Subjects undergoing open AAA repair, EVAR or lower limb revascularisation were studied prospectively. Pre-operative nutrition was assessed clinically using Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and body composition was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scanning. SIRS severity was assessed for 5 post-operative days and sepsis noted within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Using MNA, neither SIRS severity nor sepsis occurrence differed significantly between 'well-nourished' subjects and those 'at risk of malnutrition'. Using DEXA, negative associations existed between body mass index and both SIRS score and SIRS duration. Fat free mass (FFM) was negatively associated with SIRS score and duration. Negative associations also existed between skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and SIRS score and duration. SMM was also negatively correlated with post-operative length of stay in hospital. There were no significant correlations between sepsis and any nutritional indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower pre-operative nutritional indices, indicating protein energy malnutrition, were associated with more severe systemic inflammatory responses following major vascular surgery.